You are on page 1of 2

Eco-tourism and its socio-cultural impact –

The Positive: Eco-tourism is the melting pot of cultures and
people. National and/or local pride is a direct manifestation of how
appreciative a foreign culture is of one’s own. Income generated through
eco-tourism benefits the locals and keeps migration for jobs at bay. Local
knowledge also stays within the community and is passed on. A successful
example can be found in a developed country – Canada. Nunavut in Northern
Canada chose eco-tourism as a viable industry. A successful effort saw the
preservation the Aboriginal and Inuit communities.

The Negative: There is a very high probability of a culture
clash. Outside influences can wreck havoc with the ethnic way of living. Local
culture and heritage should be showcased but often it is ‘packaged’ to conform
to Western expectations. Bastardization of customs into pop culture is an ever
present danger. Also, eco-tourism often forms the single source of revenue for
a community. Any cyclical changes in the economy affect it as a whole. The
island of Dominica rushed headlong into eco-tourism. Today, corruption and
environmental degradation has left its industry in shambles.

Eco-tourism and its economic impact –

The Positive: Eco-tourism has amply demonstrated its
potential to be a huge dollar earner. The money earned should be ploughed back
into the local society. This can go to create a better life for the local
populace though schools, better roads and hospitals. Through taxes and consumer
spending the whole country stands to benefit the fruits of eco-tourism. Again,
the funds generated through eco-tourism can be used for the preservation of the
fount itself, the natural resource.

The Negative: Two stumbling blocks directly emerge from an
ill managed eco-tourism plan. The first is ‘enclave tourism’. This describes a
situation wherein eco-tourism is sold as a ‘package’ most often in the country
of the traveler. This means that very little currency gets into the hands of
the local community. ‘Import Leakage’ is another difficulty. To meet the luxury
demands of particular tourists, locals must import other goods from outside.
For e.g. beverages and food. This essentially means that wealth leaves the
community to pay for outside imports. Eco-tourism at the cost of the
environment puts a load on the local resources. Scarce resources have to
compete with volume of tourist traffic.

Eco-tourism and its environmental impact –

The Positive: The most valuable contribution of eco-tourism
is the preservation of biodiversity. Biodiversity is increasingly looked upon
as a sustainable asset and eco-tourism forms a vital cog of it. The world’s
largest wetlands in Brazil’s Pantanal’s are also a large grazing ground for the
beef industry. Mostly populated by private ranches, a sustainable development
plan as an eco-tourism destination made it a success story.

The Negative: Eco-tourism improperly managed means a
walkthrough by droves of tourists through virgin lands. This invasion rapidly
spirals into an orgy of opportunism as everybody attempts to cash in.
Environmental degradation follows. The popularity of an eco-tourism destination
could be directly proportional to its rate of destruction. Local flora stand to
be harvested for economic gain thus eroding their natural value. The
destruction of native butterfly species followed rapid development of
infrastructure for eco-tourism in Mexico.

Eco-tourism remains a story of triumphs and failures. In the
end when we total up all the pluses and minuses, we as preservers must realize
that eco-tourism must not be only about plants and animals but also a little
about the people who are born around it. It is about sustainability or its
converse. And its ripple effects.