Wall boiling models form FLUENT documentation

© All Rights Reserved

25 views

Wall boiling models form FLUENT documentation

© All Rights Reserved

- Boiling Crisis Phenomenon Part1
- Copeland Refrigeration Manual - Part 3 - The Refrigeration Load
- 2006 Phy Mock Paper I
- Boiling Heat Transfer
- Transcript
- Heat Exchangers
- a5
- Heat Transfer and Heat Exchangers a Glance
- Heat Exchanger Handoout
- A Critical Review of Models of Coupled Heat and Mass Transfer in Falling Film Absorption
- 221394_10_3_6
- Heat Transfer in Packed Beds
- WP UniSim Design Blowdown Utility
- OAU Heat Transfer Lecture 4 Heat Exchangers 1
- Younes and Hassan 2012 an Analytical Model of Flow Boiling Heat Transfer for Slug Flow in a Single Circular Horizontal Micro-Channel
- kaurad95
- Heat 4e Chap02 Lecture
- Heat Exchangers in Refrigeration English
- HMT of Aerosols 2
- A Tv Utility

You are on page 1of 10

https://www.sharcnet.ca/Software/Fluent14/help/flu_th/flu_th_sec_boiling.html[6/1/2014 11:18:38 AM]

17.5.16. Wall Boiling Models

17.5.16.1. Overview

The term subcooled boiling is used to describe the physical situation where the wall temperature is high enough to

cause boiling to occur at the wall even though the bulk volume averaged liquid temperature is less than the saturation

value. In such cases, the energy is transferred directly from the wall to the liquid. Part of this energy will cause the

temperature of the liquid to increase and part will generate vapor. Interphase heat transfer will also cause the average

liquid temperature to increase, however, the saturated vapor will condense. Additionally, some of the energy may be

transferred directly from the wall to the vapor. These basic mechanisms are the foundations of the so called Rensselaer

Polytechnic Institute (RPI) models.

In ANSYS FLUENT, the wall boiling models are developed in the context of the Eulerian multiphase model. The

multiphase flows are governed by the conservation equations for phase continuity (Equation 17133), momentum

(Equation 17134), and energy (Equation 17140). The wall boiling phenomenon is modeled by the RPI nucleate

boiling model of Kurual and Podowski [192] and an extended formulation for the departed nucleate boiling regime

(DNB) by Lavieville et al [202].

The wall boiling models are compatible with three different wall boundaries: isothermal wall, specified heat flux, and

specified heat transfer coefficient (coupled wall boundary).

Specific submodels have been considered to account for the interfacial transfers of momentum, mass, and heat, as well

as turbulence models in boiling flows, as described below.

To learn how to set up the boiling model, please refer to Including the Boiling Model.

17.5.16.2. RPI Model

According to the basic RPI model, the total heat flux from the wall to the liquid is partitioned into three components,

namely the convective heat flux, the quenching heat flux, and the evaporative heat flux:

(17

292)

The heated wall surface is subdivided into area , which is covered by nucleating bubbles and a portion ,

which is covered by the fluid.

The convective heat flux is expressed as

(17

293)

where is the single phase heat transfer coefficient, and and are the wall and liquid temperatures, respectively.

The quenching heat flux models the cyclic averaged transient energy transfer related to liquid filling the wall

vicinity after bubble detachment, and is expressed as

(17

17.5.16. Wall Boiling Models

https://www.sharcnet.ca/Software/Fluent14/help/flu_th/flu_th_sec_boiling.html[6/1/2014 11:18:38 AM]

294)

Where is the conductivity, is the periodic time, and is the diffusivity.

The evaporative flux is given by

(17

295)

Where is the volume of the bubble based on the bubble departure diameter, is the active nucleate site density,

is the vapor density, and is the latent heat of evaporation, and is the bubble departure frequency. These

equations need closure for the following parameters:

Area of Influence

Its definition is based on the departure diameter and the nucleate site density:

(17

296)

Note that in order to avoid numerical instabilities due to unbound empirical correlations for the nucleate site density, the

area of influence has to be restricted. The area of influence is limited as follows:

(17

297)

The value of the empirical constant is usually set to 4, however it has been found that this value is not universal and

may vary between 1.8 and 5. The following relation for this constant has also been implemented based on Del Valle

and Kenning's findings [77]:

(17

298)

and is the subcooled J acob number defined as

(17

299)

where

Frequency of Bubble Departure

Implementation of the RPI model normally uses the frequency of bubble departure as the one based on inertia controlled

17.5.16. Wall Boiling Models

https://www.sharcnet.ca/Software/Fluent14/help/flu_th/flu_th_sec_boiling.html[6/1/2014 11:18:38 AM]

growth (not really applicable to subcooled boiling) [64]

(17

300)

Nucleate Site Density

The nucleate site density is usually represented by a correlation based on the wall superheat. The general expression is

of the form

(17

301)

Here the empirical parameters from Lemmert and Chawla [207] are used, where and . Other

formulations are also available, such as Kocamustafaogullari and Ishii [186] where

(17

302)

Here

Where is the bubble departure diameter and the density function is defined as

(17

303)

Bubble Departure Diameter

The default bubble departure diameter (mm) for the RPI model is based on empirical correlations [192] and is calculated

as

(17

304)

while Kocamustafaogullari and Ishii [186] use

(17

305)

17.5.16. Wall Boiling Models

https://www.sharcnet.ca/Software/Fluent14/help/flu_th/flu_th_sec_boiling.html[6/1/2014 11:18:38 AM]

with being the contact angle in degrees.

The bubble departure diameter (mm) based on the Unal relationship[452] is calculated as

(17

306)

(17

307)

(17

308)

(17

309)

where is the flow pressure, is the wall superheat, is latent heat, is the near wall bulk

velocity, and . The subscripts , and denote the solid material, liquid, and vapor phase,

respectively.

17.5.16.3. Non-equilibrium Subcooled Boiling

When using the basic RPI model (RPI Model), the temperature of the vapor is not calculated, but instead is fixed at the

saturation temperature. To model boiling departing from the nucleate boiling regime (DNB), or to model it up to the

critical heat flux and post dry-out condition, it is necessary to include the vapor temperature in the solution process. The

wall heat partition is now modified as follows:

(17

310)

Here , , and are the liquid-phase convective heat flux, quenching heat flux, and evaporation heat flux,

respectively (described in detail in RPI Model). The extra heat fluxes are representing the convective heat flux of

the vapor phase, and representing heat flux to any other possible gas phases in a system. These can be expressed as

(17

311)

(17

312)

Similar to the liquid phase , the convective heat transfer coefficients and are computed from the wall

function formulations.

The function depends on the local liquid volume fraction with similar limiting values as the liquid volume

17.5.16. Wall Boiling Models

https://www.sharcnet.ca/Software/Fluent14/help/flu_th/flu_th_sec_boiling.html[6/1/2014 11:18:38 AM]

fraction. Lavieville et al [202] proposed the following expression:

(17

313)

Here, the critical value for the vapor fraction is

17.5.16.4. Critical Heat Flux

In wall boiling, the critical heat flux (CHF) condition is characterized by a sharp reduction of local heat transfer

coefficients and the excursion of wall surface temperatures. It occurs when heated surfaces are no longer wetted by

boiling liquid with the increase of vapor content. At critical heat flux conditions, vapor replaces the liquid and occupies

the space adjacent to heated walls. The energy is thus directly transferred from the wall to the vapor. In turn, it results

in rapid reduction of the heat removal ability and sharp rise of the vapor temperature, and most importantly, the wall

temperatures. In addition, wall boiling departs from the nucleating boiling regime, and the multiphase flow regime

changes from a bubbly flow to a mist flow.

To model the critical heat flux conditions, the basic approach adopted in ANSYS FLUENT is to extend the RPI model

from the nucleate boiling regime to critical heat flux and post dry-out conditions, while considering the following:

The generalized and non-equilibrium wall heat flux partition

The flow regime transition from bubbly to mist flows

17.5.16.4.1. Wall Heat Flux Partition

The wall heat partition is defined in the same way as Equation 17310, with the exception of the function definition.

Here, the function depends on the local liquid/vapor volume fraction with the same limiting values as the

liquid volume fraction, i.e., between zero and one. Lavieville et al. [202] proposed the following expression:

(17

314)

The critical value for the liquid volume fraction is , and for the vapor phase, it is .

There are also some other functions available to define the wall heat flux partition. When defining wall boiling regimes,

Tentner et al. [450] suggested the following expression based on the vapor volume fraction:

(17

17.5.16. Wall Boiling Models

https://www.sharcnet.ca/Software/Fluent14/help/flu_th/flu_th_sec_boiling.html[6/1/2014 11:18:38 AM]

315)

Taking the thin film boiling into consideration in the wall heat flux partition, Ioilev et al. [451] used a linear function to

extend Equation 17315 to the critical heat flux condition:

(17

316)

Where the breakpoints have been set to and .

In ANSYS FLUENT, Equation 17315 is chosen as the default formulation for the wall heat flux partition.

17.5.16.4.2. Flow Regime Transition

When wall boiling departs from the nucleate boiling regime and reaches the critical heat flux and post dry-out

conditions, the multiphase flow regime changes from a bubbly flow to a mist flow. Consequently, the liquid phase

switches from the continuous phase to the dispersed phase, while the vapor phase becomes the continuous phase from

the originally dispersed phase in the bubbly flow regime. With the flow regime transition, the interfacial area,

momentum transfer terms (drag, lift, turbulent dispersion, interfacial area, etc.), heat transfer and turbulence quantities

will change accordingly.

To mimic the change of the flow regime and compute the interfacial transfers, the so-called flow regime maps, based on

cross-section averaged flow parameters, are traditionally used in sub-channel one-dimensional thermal-hydraulic codes.

In CFD solvers, the concept of flow regime maps has been expanded into a local, cell-based interfacial surface topology

to evaluate the flow regime transitions from local flow parameters. The ensemble of all the computational cells with

their usually simple local interfacial surface topologies can provide complex global topologies to represent the different

flow regimes as the traditional sub-channel flow regime maps.

As a first step, this implementation adopts a simple local interfacial surface topology to control the transition smoothly

from a continuous liquid bubbly flow to a continuous vapor droplet flow configuration [450], [451]. It assumes that

inside a computational cell, the local interfacial surface topology contains multi-connected interfaces, and the flow

regimes are determined by a single local flow quantity the vapor volume fraction :

Bubbly flow topology: the vapor phase is dispersed in the continuous liquid in the form of bubbles. Typically

Mist flow topology: the liquid phase is dispersed in the continuous vapor in the form of droplets. Typically

Churn flow: this is an intermediate topology between the bubbly and mist flow topology, where

The interfacial surface topologies are used to compute the interfacial area and interfacial transfers of momentum and

heat. Introducing to represent interfacial quantities (interfacial area, drag, lift, turbulent drift force and heat transfer),

17.5.16. Wall Boiling Models

https://www.sharcnet.ca/Software/Fluent14/help/flu_th/flu_th_sec_boiling.html[6/1/2014 11:18:38 AM]

then they are calculated using the following general form:

(17

317)

Here is computed using equation Equation 17315 or Equation 17316, but with different lower and upper

limits of the breakpoints. Typically, the values of 0.3 and 0.7 are used and and are the interfacial

quantities from bubbly flow and mist flow, respectively. They are calculated using the interfacial sub-models presented

in Interfacial Momentum Transfer and Interfacial Heat Transfer.

It may be noted that in the boiling models, the liquid is usually defined as the first phase, and the vapor as the second

phase. Once this is defined, it remains unchanged with the flow regime transition. When and are

calculated, however, the primary or secondary phases are switched. For , the liquid is treated as the primary

phase, while the vapor is the secondary phase. Contrary to this, for , the vapor becomes the primary phase and

the liquid is the secondary phase.

17.5.16.5. Interfacial Momentum Transfer

The interfacial momentum transfer may include four parts: drag, lift, virtual mass and turbulent drift forces (all

described in Conservation Equations, Interphase Exchange Coefficients, and Turbulence Models. In the wall boiling

models, the virtual mass force is modeled using the standard correlation implemented in the Eulerian multiphase model

within ANSYS FLUENT, while specific sub-models have been implemented for drag, lift, and turbulent drift forces.

Also, user-defined options are available for both drag and lift forces.

17.5.16.5.1. Interfacial Area

The interfacial area is an important parameter for the drag and the heat transfer process. For dispersed boiling, the

interfacial area, based on the diameter of the bubble, would be enough. However, as bubble coalescence takes place,

this needs to be modified. The following options are included:

Particle Model:

(17

318)

Symmetric Model: (default model)

(17

319)

Ishii Model:

(17

320)

17.5.16.5.2. Interfacial Drag Force

17.5.16. Wall Boiling Models

https://www.sharcnet.ca/Software/Fluent14/help/flu_th/flu_th_sec_boiling.html[6/1/2014 11:18:38 AM]

The interfacial drag force is calculated using the standard model described in Interphase Exchange Coefficients (and

defined in the context of the interfacial area in Equation 17318) is of the general form

(17

321)

Where the drag coefficient is determined by choosing the minimum of the viscous regime and the distorted

regime , defined as follows:

(17

322)

The bubble diameter can be a constant value, a UDF, or a correlation function of local subcooling

[192]:

(17

323)

17.5.16.5.3. Interfacial Lift Force

The coefficient for the interfacial lift force is calculated using the correlation proposed by Moraga et al. [266]:

(17

324)

Where . The lift coefficient combines the opposing action of two lift forces: the classical aerodynamics lift

force resulting from interaction between bubble and liquid shear, and the lateral force resulting from interaction

between bubble and vortexes shed by bubble wakes. Here is the bubble Reynolds number, and

is the bubble shear Reynolds number.

The formulation proposed by Tomiyama et al. [445] is also available with the lift coefficient expressed as

, where

(17

325)

and

17.5.16. Wall Boiling Models

https://www.sharcnet.ca/Software/Fluent14/help/flu_th/flu_th_sec_boiling.html[6/1/2014 11:18:38 AM]

(17

326)

where is the bubble Reynolds number and

(17

327)

is the Etvos number, with as the gravitational acceleration and the surface tension number.

17.5.16.5.4. Turbulence Drift Force

In the ANSYS FLUENT Eulerian multiphase model, the general correlation for turbulence drift force (turbulent

dispersion) is based on Simonin [355]. Due to numerical instabilities this force is now included in the Rhie & Chow

interpolation [327] for the volume flux calculations. Simonins [355] approach can be also used for the boiling model.

However, for completeness of the RPI model, the default for the turbulent drift force is given by

(17

328)

Where with is the turbulent kinetic energy and the turbulent dispersion coefficient is, by default, set to 1.0

17.5.16.6. Interfacial Heat Transfer

17.5.16.6.1. Interface to Liquid Heat Transfer

As the bubbles depart from the wall and move towards the subcooled region, there is heat transfer from the bubble to the

liquid, that is defined as

(17

329)

Where is the interfacial area defined by Equation 17319 and is the heat transfer coefficient based on the Ranz-

Marshall correlation [319]

(17

330)

17.5.16.6.2. Interface to Vapor Heat Transfer

The interface to vapor heat transfer is calculated using the constant time scale return to saturation method [202]. It is

assumed that the vapor retains the saturation temperature by rapid evaporation/condensation. The formulation is as

follows:

17.5.16. Wall Boiling Models

https://www.sharcnet.ca/Software/Fluent14/help/flu_th/flu_th_sec_boiling.html[6/1/2014 11:18:38 AM]

(17

331)

Where is the time scale set to a default value of 0.05 and is the isobaric heat capacity.

17.5.16.7. Mass Transfer

17.5.16.7.1. Mass Transfer From the Wall to Vapor

The evaporation mass flow is applied at the cell near the wall and it is derived from the evaporation heat flux,

Equation 17331

(17

332)

17.5.16.7.2. Interfacial Mass Transfer

The interfacial mass transfer depends directly on the interfacial heat transfer. Assuming that all the heat transferred to

the interface is used in mass transfer (i.e. evaporation or condensation), the interfacial mass transfer rate can be written

as:

(17

333)

17.5.16.8. Turbulence Models

Turbulence quantities depend on the models selected for the problem, i.e. Mixture model, Dispersed Model or Model

per phase. For the conventional mixture k-epsilon models, two additional terms have been included to describe

additional bubble stirring and dissipation: one in the turbulent kinetic energy ( ), and the other in the dissipation rate

equation ( ):

(17

334)

(17

335)

where [390].

Release 14.0 - 2011 SAS IP, Inc. All rights reserved.

- Boiling Crisis Phenomenon Part1Uploaded byjojovaliaveetil
- Copeland Refrigeration Manual - Part 3 - The Refrigeration LoadUploaded byMohammad Amer
- 2006 Phy Mock Paper IUploaded byapi-3814290
- Boiling Heat TransferUploaded byPravin Bote
- TranscriptUploaded byNurAfifah Osman
- Heat ExchangersUploaded byAbdullah Sabry Azzam
- a5Uploaded byaliscribd46
- Heat Transfer and Heat Exchangers a GlanceUploaded byMuralidarran
- Heat Exchanger HandooutUploaded byAllen John Eje Babasa
- A Critical Review of Models of Coupled Heat and Mass Transfer in Falling Film AbsorptionUploaded byKristell Garcia Tenorio
- 221394_10_3_6Uploaded byEx Lee
- Heat Transfer in Packed BedsUploaded bypavanchem61
- WP UniSim Design Blowdown UtilityUploaded bykglorstad
- OAU Heat Transfer Lecture 4 Heat Exchangers 1Uploaded byAbiodun Ademuyiwa Micah
- Younes and Hassan 2012 an Analytical Model of Flow Boiling Heat Transfer for Slug Flow in a Single Circular Horizontal Micro-ChannelUploaded byChong Jen Haw
- kaurad95Uploaded bysuryaa
- Heat 4e Chap02 LectureUploaded byAbdul Mohsin
- Heat Exchangers in Refrigeration EnglishUploaded bywazizi hamzah
- HMT of Aerosols 2Uploaded bymmbmnbmnb
- A Tv UtilityUploaded bySafrul Efendi
- gm7019Uploaded byRomel Leo Alojado
- Final Version PhD Thesis Yosr AlloucheUploaded byjabesa
- 10.1016@j.ijheatmasstransfer.2010.07.059.pdfUploaded byRizki Triwulanda
- ICTEA2019 BrochureUploaded bygnbabuiitg
- lab4Uploaded bylalela
- A Concept of Heat Dissipation Coefficient for Thermal Cloak Based on EntropyUploaded byMarco Bernardes
- ch4_5Uploaded byRishok
- Lecture 1.pptxUploaded byAmmar Altaf
- Module8_TeacherSlides.pptUploaded byvikas pathe
- HEAT+TRANSFER+(EMEM-203)-A+PreIntroUploaded byAhmed Aly

- filenameUploaded byShanmuga Navaneethan
- What is a Comparison of the Major CFD Software PackagesUploaded byAttique Javaid
- Why does the Quran say that the Sun revolves around the Earth_ - QuoraUploaded byAttique Javaid
- VSA - Cheat SheetUploaded byAriel Devulsky
- DESIGN OF PRESSURE VESSELUploaded bybbmoksh
- VonMisesCriterion.pdfUploaded byDeepak Ashokan
- Flow in Rotating CavityUploaded byAttique Javaid
- ITA-vs-NITAUploaded byAttique Javaid
- 01 - Vorticity and RotationalityUploaded byAttique Javaid
- Fracture Wb145 CAEA 0Uploaded byAmine Bou
- Implicit vs ExplicitUploaded byAttique Javaid
- PTS, Kori Unit 1Uploaded byAttique Javaid
- Planetary GearingUploaded byAttique Javaid
- FEACrack_Validation.pdfUploaded byAttique Javaid
- Gear TrainsUploaded byAttique Javaid
- Turbulence Model Summary ChartUploaded byAttique Javaid
- Benchmarking of Holtec's FLUENT Based Pressure Drop MethodUploaded byAttique Javaid
- Zencrack81 Installation and ExecutionUploaded byAttique Javaid
- Time-Dependent Properties of Liquid WaterUploaded byAttique Javaid
- Dr Muhammad Shehryar PublicationUploaded byOsama Bin Anwar
- trade deficit pakistanUploaded byAttique Javaid
- rpv neutron embrittlement and metal fatigueUploaded byAttique Javaid
- Modeling TurubulenceUploaded byRegis Ngenzi
- 20 APDL Commands Every ANSYS Mechanical User Should KnowUploaded byAttique Javaid
- CH04_1AUploaded byAttique Javaid
- syllabus cfd.pdfUploaded byAttique Javaid
- ReadMeUploaded byVinosha Sivadev
- Elsevier Article DocUploaded byRobert Hawkins
- Self Learning CFDUploaded byAttique Javaid
- Layer InflationUploaded byAttique Javaid

- DSC curve of PVC and plasticizer contentUploaded byBenpetro Chaichua
- BOOK_Design of Reinforced Concrete Structure Mashhour Ahmed GhoneimV02Uploaded byVladimir Gucond
- Eee590 Ic-technology SyllabusUploaded byKeerthiKalyan
- PlasticsUploaded byWekesa Caleb
- p623Uploaded byYadava Jaffa
- libroduplex.pdfUploaded byHugo Peña
- Introduction to EBSDUploaded byNoé Seijo
- Stress Analysis of Functionally Graded Rotating Discs%3Aanalytical and Numerical SolutionsUploaded byAvinash Kawale
- Color My NanoworldUploaded byWaleed El-azab
- Flow VisualizationUploaded byFaheem Ahmed
- GRIN_Rod_LensesUploaded byErgi Dönerçark
- ch13Uploaded byLaurertan Tavares
- geometric-linear-and-nonlinear-analysis-of-beam-IJERTV2IS70212.pdfUploaded byMustafaMahdi
- 351Uploaded byBhavani Prasad
- Heat Transfer 2 MarksUploaded byvenkatesh
- OTPORNOST_PPT_Dobro.pdfUploaded byMilutin Zizic
- Principles of Nucleation and Crystal GrowthUploaded bywvickery_1
- Design of Partially or Fully Composite Beams, with Ribbed Metal Deck, Using LRFD SpecificationsUploaded byMala Rattan
- QuestionsUploaded bychitra123
- Hmt Unit 01Uploaded byThulasi Ram
- Structure and ShapesUploaded byDoc_Croc
- Friction Loss, Properties & Standard PipesUploaded byAyaEzz
- As Level Physics DefinitionsUploaded bySamer Ehab
- review of design codes for masonry buildingUploaded bybhanubhak
- Singh 2017Uploaded byPablo VP
- Stress Analysis of GRP-GRE-FRP Piping.docxUploaded byHmd Mokhtari
- Effect of Steel Ratio and Mineral Admixtures on Crushing Load of Short ColumnsUploaded byesatjournals
- Syllabus SJVN Ltd Executive Trainees Civil Engg1 (1)Uploaded byAswathy M N
- index.pdfUploaded byace7721
- Introduction to Colloid and Surface ChemistryUploaded byRoberto Carlos

## Much more than documents.

Discover everything Scribd has to offer, including books and audiobooks from major publishers.

Cancel anytime.