Professional Documents
Culture Documents
, S. Ramakumar
, , 3
and
Anjali A. Karande
, 2
Running title: Structure-function relationship of Abrus precatorius toxins
Department of Biochemistry, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, BRONX, New York 10461,
USA.
- atoms of abrin-a
and APA-I is 1.14 . It is higher than that
calculated separately for A-chains and B-
chains; 0.78 and 0.57 respectively. The
general architecture of APA-I is similar to that
of other type II RIPs that include ricin, abrin,
mistletoe lectin. Fig. 8 shows the cartoon
representation of APA-I molecule.
By reference to the description of
abrin-a A chain, APA-I A chain consists of
three folding domains. Domain 1 is composed
of residues 2-108 consisting of six stranded -
sheet, one -hairpin and two helices. The N-
terminus of APA-I is one residue shorter than
that of abrin-a and the first two residues are
disordered. Domain 2 consists of residues
from 109-196 and is the most conserved part
of the A-chain of type II RIPs. It has a
preponderance of helices with a total of five
helices. Domain 3 consists of residues 197-
261. It contains two helices and two anti
parallel strands and a random coil at the C
terminus. The C-terminus of APA-I is ten
residues longer than that of abrin-a. The
electron density for the terminal residues was
not clear hence the C terminus of APA-I could
be modeled till Asn250.
The structure of B-chain, the lectin
chain, is highly conserved across the type II
RIP family. The major differences may lie in
the labile region or the loop structures. The
lectin chain of APA-I is divided into two
homologous domains B1 and B2, each of
which consists of four sub domains namely ,
, and . The three sub domains , ,
possess a pseudo three fold symmetry around
a hydrophobic core. This type of folding has
been classified as the -Trefoil fold (41).
APA-I B chain contains three N-
glycosylation sites namely, Asn100, Asn140,
and Asn214. The consensus sequence
corresponding to the N-glycosylation sites in
particular is Asn-Xaa-Ser/Thr. In case of
APA-I this sequence is Asn-Xaa-Thr where
Xaa is any amino acid. The crystal structure
reveals the presence of two glycosylation sites
Asn100 and Asn140 holding sugar chains in
1 and 2 sub domains. APA-I B chain
contains two sugar-binding sites at Asn51 and
Asn260 present in 1 and 2 sub domains
respectively. The architecture of sugar binding
pockets in APA-I is similar to that of abrin-a.
Active site architecture: The A chain of APA-
I is associated with N-glycosidase enzymatic
activity (1,2). The overall structure of A chain
consists of three domains. The active site is
located in the cleft formed by these domains.
The active site consists of Tyr73, Tyr112,
Glu163, Arg166, Trp197, Asn71, Arg123,
Gln159, Glu194, and Asn195 (Fig. 8), which
are conserved among the type II RIPs. It has
been suggested based on recent crystal
structure analyses of various type II RIPs that
the active site remains constant in all RIPs
belonging to this class (8). Some deviation
may occur due to orientation of the side chain,
a
t
I
N
D
I
A
N
I
N
S
T
O
F
S
C
I
E
N
C
E
o
n
A
p
r
i
l
2
9
,
2
0
1
4
h
t
t
p
:
/
/
w
w
w
.
j
b
c
.
o
r
g
/
D
o
w
n
l
o
a
d
e
d
f
r
o
m
7
number of water molecules, water mediated
hydrogen bonding and the overall interaction
network in the active site region (8). In APA-I
the position of Trp197 is fixed by direct
hydrogen bonds to the main chain NE1
(Trp197) to O (Leu241). The position of
Arg166 is fixed by side chain hydrogen bonds
with NH1 (Arg166) to OE2 (Glu163) and the
main chain hydrogen bond with N (Ala240) to
O (Arg166). The hydroxyl group of Tyr112 is
seen to be interacting with OE1 of Glu 163 via
hydrogen bonds and OE2 of Glu163 is
hydrogen bonded to NH1 of Arg166. Hence
the active site residues seem to be held
strongly at their positions via a network of
hydrogen bonds.
The orientation of two aromatic rings
of Tyr73 and Tyr112 (Fig. 8) forms an
important point of discussion. Figure 9A
shows the omit map density around these
tyrosine residues. The almost parallel
orientation proves to be the best for
incorporating the planar adenine of the
ribosomal unit. The main function of these
two residues is to form a route for the
substrate by keeping adenine strictly parallel
to the plane of their aromatic rings. In case of
ricin (9) the Tyr80 must rotate about 40 to
facilitate stacking. Like in abrin-a, these
aromatics are almost parallel in APA-I. The
studies on site directed mutagenesis of
invariant Tyr residues in the active site of ricin
have revealed that Y80F and Y123F
substitutions reduced the activity by 15 and 7-
folds respectively (42). This implies that the
inability of Phe side chains in taking part in
the hydrogen bonding weakens their ability to
hold the adenine molecule. Hence the presence
and orientation of tyrosine residues plays an
important role in the catalytic activity of RIPs.
Glu163 and Arg166 are the main residues
involved in the hydrolysis of N-C glycosidic
bond. Studies on mutants of abrin-a (43)
(E164A, R167L, double mutant E164A and
R167L) show marked decrease in the activity
by 25, 625 and 1250 fold respectively.
Sugar binding and N-glycosylation sites:
Two putative galactose-binding sites Asn51
and Asn260 are present in APA-I B chain as in
abrin-a (19). These sugar-binding sites occur
in the sub domains 1 and 2. In these sub
domains sugar molecule is expected to lie in a
shallow pocket formed on one side by a kink
in the chain and a conserved aromatic residue
forms the top of the pocket (44). For APA-I
the sequence of the kink in sub domain 1 is
Asp-Val-Ser while for 2 it is Asp-Val-Lys.
The corresponding sequences in abrin are
Asp-Val-Tyr and Asp-Val-Lys respectively.
The aromatic rings in the two sub domains of
APA-I are Trp42 and Trp253. These side
chains serve as a flat binding surface for sugar
moieties but do not make specific interactions
with the sugar. Hydrogen bonding occurs
between galactose and homologous amides
Asn51 and Asn260, which in turn are
stabilized by hydrogen bonds to homologous
aminoacids Asp27 and Asp239. The
superposition of sugar binding pockets of
abrin and agglutinin show no marked
differences (Figure not shown).
The predicted potential glycosylation
sites of APA-I are Asn100, Asn140 and
Asn214 in APA-I B chain and Asn215 and
Asn250 in APA-I A chain (19). Mannose
could be clearly modeled at Asn215 in APA-I
A-chain (Fig. 9B) whereas abrin-a does not
reveal the presence of any potential
glycosylation site at a corresponding position
in its A-chain (8, 19). These five glycosylation
sites occur at the 1, 2 and 1 subdomains of
the lectin chain while one occurs in domain 3
of the toxin subunit of APA-I. Figure 9B
shows the electron density of the glycan
chains. Two molecules of N-acetyl-
glucosamine (NAG) and one molecule of
Mannose (MAN) were modeled at the N-
glycosylation sites with NAG at Asn100 and
Asn140 in APA-I B chain while MAN at
Asn215 in APA-I A chain. The sugars
modeled at these electron density blobs are
also seen in abrin-a molecule.
Structural basis for APA-I (with Pro at
position 199) being less toxic than Abrin:
Despite sharing major similarities with the
other type II RIPs, APA-I possesses some
distinct features, which may be responsible for
its less toxicity. A strikingly different behavior
is seen at the substrate binding sites of APA-I.
a
t
I
N
D
I
A
N
I
N
S
T
O
F
S
C
I
E
N
C
E
o
n
A
p
r
i
l
2
9
,
2
0
1
4
h
t
t
p
:
/
/
w
w
w
.
j
b
c
.
o
r
g
/
D
o
w
n
l
o
a
d
e
d
f
r
o
m
8
The nature of the residue at the substrate-
binding site is found to play a major role.
Comparison of the residues which actively
participate in the binding of the substrate in
abrin, ricin and APA-I reveal that Asn200 of
abrin-a corresponding to Arg213 of ricin A, is
required for the binding to the substrate in the
-sarcin loop, a GpApApAp tetra nucleotide
sequence located at the 3-terminal region of
28S rRNA (45, 46). In case of ricin, Arg213
acts as a positively charged recognition group
for the negatively charged substrate, possibly
by forming a salt linkage with the phosphate
backbone of RNA (47). In abrin-a, the
corresponding Asn200 has a polar group and
can bind to the substrate effectively via strong
interactions. However, a proline residue,
Pro199, is present at the corresponding
position in APA-I. It was hypothesized by
others earlier
(19) that the Pro199 in APA-I
(Fig. 9A) could cause bending of the
amphiphilic helix (Fig. 8) and thereby be a
contributing factor for the decreased toxicity
of APA-I.
Present analysis of x-ray structure
model reveals no evidence of a pronounced
kink in the helix induced by the proline
residue in APA-I. The proline substitution
takes place at the third position of the
amphiphilic -helix from the N-terminus.
Researches in the past have revealed that the
highest preference of occurrence of proline is
at the starting of the -helix (48). Pro, at the
N-terminus is perhaps better described as the
helix initiator than helix breaker (49). The
inability of Proline to form main chain and
side chain hydrogen bonds effectively results
in weak binding of the substrate in this region
and hence probably is the major cause of the
decreased toxicity of APA-I as compared to
abrin-a and ricin. Moreover, comparison of the
amphiphilic helices in abrin-a, ricin and APA-
I provides no evidence of any kink in the helix
caused by proline in APA-I (details not
shown).
Proposed model for APA-I existing as a
heterotetramer: Fig. 10 shows the
dimerization of APA-I molecule about the 2-
fold axis thereby depicting its organization as
a heterotetramer, made up of two A and two B
chains. This is also clearly evident from gel
filtration and electrophoresis experiments
shown in Fig. 1A and 1B. Two A-B
monomers are related by a crystallographic
two-fold symmetry and face each other at the
N terminus of their respective A-chains
thereby forming a BAAB or B-s-s-AA-s-s-
B heterotetramer where s-s is a disulfide bond.
Unlike ricinus agglutinin (50), APA-I tetramer
has no disulfide bonds at the interface region
due to the absence of free cysteines in APA-I
A chain. The interfacial residues lose their
accessible surface area upon dimer formation
and hence are buried at the contact surface.
The total accessible surface area buried by the
components in the contact site is 2287
2
,
which is well within the range for a non-
covalent interaction forming a protein-protein
dimer (51). However, many polar residues are
present at the interface perhaps implying that
the oligomer is of the non-obligate type (52,
53).
Within the limits of accuracy of
experimental measurement, the distances
calculated at the putative tetramerisation
interface are approximately in the range of
hydrogen bonds, salt bridges and hydrophobic
contacts. The Shape Complementary (S
C
)
index (54) is used here to examine the shape
complementarity of dimer-dimer interface as
obtained by applying crystallographic two fold
axis. The calculated value of S
C
index for the
tetrameric arrangement of APA-I is 0.729,
which is well within the limits of 0.70 to 0.76
for oligomeric and protein/protein inhibitor
interfaces as suggested by Lawrence &
Colman (54).
Taking together the factors such as
decrease in surface accessibility upon
oligomerisation, shape complementarity, high
solvent content in the unit cell, and presence
of both short and long range cohesive forces at
the interface region, we are able to provide a
plausible tetramer model for APA-I. It may be
suggested that the tetrameric arrangement of
APA-I observed from the crystal structure,
presumably corresponds to that seen in the gel
filtration experiments (Fig. 1B), even though
the functional implications of the dimer of
dimers are not clear at present.
a
t
I
N
D
I
A
N
I
N
S
T
O
F
S
C
I
E
N
C
E
o
n
A
p
r
i
l
2
9
,
2
0
1
4
h
t
t
p
:
/
/
w
w
w
.
j
b
c
.
o
r
g
/
D
o
w
n
l
o
a
d
e
d
f
r
o
m
9
DISCUSSION
Abrin, Ricin and Diptheria toxins are powerful
cellular toxins: even a single molecule can kill
a cell (55). The protein synthesis inhibitory
activity of an Abrus agglutinin was reported to
be weaker than abrin in in vitro assays (19).
Both the molecules have similar therapeutic
indices (56) however the LD
50
for abrin is 20
g/kg body weight and agglutinin is 5 mg/kg
bodyweight (57).
Experiments conducted in our
laboratory revealed that the APA-I is less toxic
to whole cells and the reduction in the activity
of the molecule could be related to the
structural differences in the active sites of
abrin and APA-I. The differences in protein
synthesis inhibition observed between cell
lines by APA-I is not due to lower binding of
this molecule shown by binding studies (Fig
3).
Induction of apoptosis by RIPs is
known for a long time (58). APA-I apart from
protein synthesis inhibition also induced
apoptosis. Even though Jurkat and MCF-7
cells showed greater clumping (agglutination)
upon addition of low concentrations of APA-I,
apoptosis was observed only upon the addition
of the amount of protein more or equal to that
of the IC
50
values suggesting that inhibition of
protein synthesis is required for apoptosis. In
spite of the agglutinating activity of APA-I, it
does not induce any signals for apoptosis
through the cell surface death receptors. A
Jurkat cell clone over-expressing Bcl-2 did not
undergo apoptosis on treatment with APA-I
and hence it can be concluded that APA-I, like
abrin, follows the mitochondrial pathway of
cell death. To summarize, the biological
studies shown here suggest that abrin and
APA-I are toxic lectins in that they inhibit
protein synthesis and induce apoptosis and the
reason for the lower cytotoxic effect by APA-I
is due to the alterations in the structure, which
is well represented in the crystal structure of
APA-I.
The crystal structure of APA-I was
analyzed to elucidate the most probable
factors for the less toxicity of APA-I than
abrin. The structure presented here revealed
important findings. The less toxic nature of
APA-I is perhaps not due to any proline
induced kink present in amphiphilic helix, as
postulated previously (19) but due to the fewer
interactions involved at the substrate binding
site. The presence of Pro199 at the substrate-
binding site (as opposed to Asn200 in abrin-a
and Arg213 in case of ricin) hinders the
possibility of interactions involving the main
chain and the side chain with the substrate
adenine.
The toxicity assays and the apoptotis
studies drive the attention towards the
possibility of using APA-I, whose 3D
structure is reported here, in the construction
of immunotoxins. Also, studies are in progress
in our laboratory for designing inhibitors that
could modulate the toxicity of RIPs.
REFERENCES
1. Endo, Y. and Tsurugi, K. (1987). J. Biol. Chem. 262, 81288130.
2. Sperti, S., Montanaro, L., Mattioli, A., & Stirpe, F. (1973). Biochem. J. 136, 813-15.
3. Endo, Y., Misui, K., Motizuki, K., Tsurugi, K. (1987). J. Biol. Chem. 262, 5908-5912.
4. Hartley, M.R., Lord, J.M. (2004). Biochimica Biophysica Acta. 1701, 1-14.
5. Olsnes, S. (2004). Toxicon 44, 361-370.
6. Husain, J., Tickle, I. J., Wood, S. P. (1994). FEBS Lett. 342, 154-158.
7. Hosur MV, Nair B, Satyamurthy P, Misquith S, Surolia A, Kannan KK. (1995). J Mol Biol. 250, 368-
380.
8. Tahirov, T. H., Lu, T. H., Liaw, Y. C., Chen, Y. L. & Lin, J. Y. (1995). J. Mol. Biol. 250, 354-367.
9. Rutenber, E., Katzin B. J., Ernst, S., Collins, E. J., Mlsna, D., Ready, M. P. & Robertus, J. D. (1991).
Proteins, 10, 240-50.
10. Sandvig, K. and van-Deurs, B. (2000) EMBO J. 19, 59435950.
a
t
I
N
D
I
A
N
I
N
S
T
O
F
S
C
I
E
N
C
E
o
n
A
p
r
i
l
2
9
,
2
0
1
4
h
t
t
p
:
/
/
w
w
w
.
j
b
c
.
o
r
g
/
D
o
w
n
l
o
a
d
e
d
f
r
o
m
10
11. Day, P.J., Owens, S.R., Wesche, J., Olsnes, S., Roberts, L.M. & Lord, J.M., (2001). J. Biol. Chem. 276,
72027208.
12. Bolognesi, A., Tazzari, P. L., Olivieri, F., Polito, L., Falini, B. & Stirpe, F. (1996). Int. J. Cancer, 68,
349355.
13. Hegde, R., Maiti, T. K. & Podder, S. K. (1991). 194, 101109.
14. Lin, J.Y., Lee, T.C., Hu, S.T., & Tung, T.C. (1981). Toxicon, 19, 41-51.
15. Narayanan, S., Surolia, A., & Karande, A. A. (2004). Biochem J. 377, 233-240.
16. Niwa, H., Tonevitsky, A. G., Agapov, II., Saward, S., Pfuller, U. & Palmer, R. A. (2003). Eur. J.
Biochem. 270, 2739-49.
17. Pascal, J. M., Day, P. J., Monzingo, A. F., Ernst, S. R., Robertus, J. D., Iglesias, R., Perez, Y., Ferreras,
J. M., Citores, L. & Girbes, T. (2001). Proteins, 43, 319-26.
18. Mishra, V., Ethayathulla, A. S., Sharma, R. S., Yadav, S., Krauspenhaar, R., Betzel, C., Babu, C. R. &
Singh, T. P. (2004). Acta Crystallog. Sect. D, 60, 2295-304.
19. Liu, C. -L., Tsai, C. -C., Lin, S. -C., Wang, L. -I., Hsu, C. -I., Hwang, M. -J. & Lin, J. -Y. (2000). J.
Biol. Chem. 275, 1897-1901.
20. K. Panneerselvam, Lin, S. -C., Liu, C. -L., Liaw, Y, -C., Lin, J -Y. & Lu, T. -H. (2000). Acta.
Crystallog. Sect. D, 56, 898-899.
21. Wei, C. H., Koh, C., Pfuderer, P. & Einstein, J. R. (1975). J. Biol. Chem. 250, 4796-4801.
22. Sharma, S., Podder, S. K. and Karande, A. A. (1999). Mol. Cell. Biochem, 133-141.
23. Talian, J. C., Olmsted, J. B., and Goldman, R. D. (1983). J. Cell Biol. 97 (4), 1277-1282.
24. McGahon. A. J., Martin, S. J., Bissonnette, R. P., Mahboubi, A., Shi, Y., Mogil, R. J., Nishioka, W. K.
and Green, D. R. (1995) Methods Cell Biol. 46, 172-173.
25. Gong, J., Traganos, F. and Darzynkiewicz, Z. (1994). Anal. Biochem. 218, 314319.
26. Matthews, B. W. (1968). J. Mol. Biol. 33, 491-97.
27. Navaza, J. (1994). Acta. Crystallog. Sect. A, 50, 157-163.
28. Brnger, A. T., Adams, P. D., Clore, G. M., Delano, W. L., Gros, P., Kunstleve, G. R.G et. al. (1998).
Acta. Crystallog. Sect. D, 59, 905-925.
29. Emsley, P. & Cowtan, K. (2004). Acta Crystallog. Sect. D, 60, 2126-2132.
30. Collaborative Computational Project Number 4 (1994). Acta Crystallog. Sect. D, 50, 760-763.
31. Winn, M. D., Murshdov, G. N., and Papiz, M. Z. (2003). Methods Enzymol. 374, 300-321.
32. Bhat, T. N. (1988). J. Appl. Cryst. 21, 279-281.
33. Read, R. J. (1986). Acta Cryst. A42, 140-149.
34. Lakowski, R. A., McArthur, M. W., Moss, D. S. & Thornton, J. M. (1993). J. Appl. Crystallog. 26, 283-
291.
35. DeLano, W. (DeLano Scientific, San Carlos, CA, USA, 2002).
36. Sheue-Fang Shih, Yu-Hauh Wu, Chih-Hung Hung, Hui-Yu Yang, and Jung-Yaw Lin (2001). J. Biol.
Chem 276, 21870-21877.
37. Thorburn, J., Frankel, A. E. and Thorburn, A. (2002). Clin. Cancer Res. 9, 861865
38. Barnet Foster, D., M, Abul-Milh, M. Huesca and C. A. Lingwood. (2000). Infect. Immun. 68, 3108-
3115.
39. Weis, W. I., Drickamer, K. and Hendrickson, W. A. (1992) Nature 360, 127-134.
40. Hegde, R., Podder, S. K. and Karande, A. A. (1993). Eur. J. Biochem. 215, 411- 419.
41. Murzin, A. G., Lesk, A. M. & Chothia, C. (1992). J. Mol. Biol. 223, 531-543.
42. Ready, M. P., Kim, Y. & Robertus, J. D. (1991). Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 10, 270-278.
43. Hung, C. H., Lee, M. C., Lee, T. C. & Lin, J. Y. (1993). J. Mol. Biol. 229, 263-267.
44. Rutenber, E., Ready, M. & Robertus, J. D. (1987). Nature, 326, 624-626.
45. Monzingo, A. F. & Robertus, J. D. (1992). J. Mol. Biol. 227, 1136-1145.
46. Kitaoka, Y. (1998). Eur. J. Biochem. 257, 255-262.
47. Sanger, S., Nicklen, S., Coulson, A. R. (1977). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 74, 5463-5467.
48. Kim, M. K. & Kang, Y. K. (1999). Protein Science, 8, 1492-1499.
49. Richardson, J. S. & Richardson, D. C. (1988). Science, 240, 1648-1652.
50. Ready, M., Wilson, K., Piatak, M. & Robertus, J. D. (1984). J. Biol. Chem. 259, 15252-15256.
51. Loredana Lo Conte, Cyrus Chothia & Jol Janin. (1999). J. Mol. Biol. 285, 2177-2198.
52. Nooren, I. M. & Thornton, J. M. (2003). EMBO J. 22, 3486-3492.
53. Zhu H, Domingues FS, Sommer I, Lengauer T. (2006). BMC Bioinformatics.7:27.
54. Lawrence, M. C. & Colman, P. M. (1993). J. Mol. Biol. 234, 946-950.
a
t
I
N
D
I
A
N
I
N
S
T
O
F
S
C
I
E
N
C
E
o
n
A
p
r
i
l
2
9
,
2
0
1
4
h
t
t
p
:
/
/
w
w
w
.
j
b
c
.
o
r
g
/
D
o
w
n
l
o
a
d
e
d
f
r
o
m
11
55. Eiklid, K., Olsnes, S., Phil, A., (1980). Exp. Cell Res.126, 321-326.
56. Reddy, V. V. S. & Sirsi, M. (1969). Cancer Res. 29, 1447-51.
57. Stirpe, F., Barbieri, L.,Battelli, M. G., Soria, M., and Lappi, D. A. (1992) BiolTechnology 10, 405-412.
58. Bantel, H., Engels, I.H., Voelter, W., Schulze-Osthoff, K., and Wesselborg, S. (1999) Cancer Res. 59, 2083-2090.
Footnotes
The atomic coordinates and structure factors (code 2AMZ) have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank,
Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ
(http://www.rcsb.org/).
1 Both authors contributed equally to this work.
2 To whom correspondence may be addressed. Tel.: +91-080-2293-2306; E-mail: anjali@biochem.iisc.ernet.in
3 To whom correspondence may be addressed. Tel.: +91-080-2293-2718; E-mail: ramak@physics.iisc.ernet.in
Abbreviations
The abbreviations used are: APA-I, Abrus precatorius Agglutinin I; RIPs, ribosome inactivating proteins; ER,
endoplasmic reticulum; HmRIP, Himalayan RIP; RPMI, Rosewell Park memorial institute; DMEM, Dulbeccos
modified Eagles medium; FBS, fetal bovine serum; TCA, trichloro aceticacid; SDS, sodium dodecyl sulfate;
FITC, fluorescein isothiocyanate; PBS, phosphate buffered saline; FACS, fluorescence-activated cell scan; RT,
room temprature; RNase, ribonuclease; PEG, polyethylene glycol; NSLS, national synchrotron light source;
BNL, Brookhaven National Laboratory; NAG, N-acetyl glucosamine; MAN, mannose; SC, shape
complimentarity index; zVAD-fmk , N-benzyloxycarbonyl-Val-Ala-Asp-(OME)-fluoro methyl ketone;
DT,diptheria toxin; STX, shiga toxin.
Acknowledgements
is a recipient of fellowship from the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, India. The FACScan facility,
Centre of Excellence in Structural Biology and Bio-computing and the interactive graphics facility IISC
Bangalore, funded by the Department of Biotechnology, Government of India is acknowledged. We would like
to thank beam line X9A, and NSLS for providing the access to collect the diffraction data. The financial support
from the Department of Science and Technology, India is acknowledged. We thank Prof. S.K. Podder for his
useful suggestions.
Figure legends
Figure 1. Purification of abrin and APA-I. Homogenized seed kernels were subjected to ammonium sulphate
precipitation followed by dialysis against PBS and then to lactamyl sepharose affinity chromatography. Bound
proteins were eluted with 0.4 M lactose, concentrated and loaded on sephadex G 100 gel filtration column of
250 ml Bed volume and the void volume is indicated by an arrow pointing downwards (Fig. 1A). The fractions
corresponding the two peaks were pooled separately. Fig. 1B: The two protein peaks were electrophoresed on
7.5% acrylamide gels under native condition and the gel was stained with Coomassie blue. Lane 1: 90 %
ammonium sulphate precipitate 2: abrin 3: lactamyl eluate 4: APA-I.
a
t
I
N
D
I
A
N
I
N
S
T
O
F
S
C
I
E
N
C
E
o
n
A
p
r
i
l
2
9
,
2
0
1
4
h
t
t
p
:
/
/
w
w
w
.
j
b
c
.
o
r
g
/
D
o
w
n
l
o
a
d
e
d
f
r
o
m
12
Figure 2. Kinetics of protein synthesis inhibition. Cells were cultured with or without abrin (2A) or APA-I (2B)
for the indicated time intervals and protein synthesis was monitored by
3
[H] leucine incorporation for 30 min
(Jurkat cells) and 60 min (MCF-7 cells) as described in the text. Inhibition of protein synthesis was expressed as
the percentage of radioactivity incorporated into the test samples compared with the untreated control cells.
Figure 3. Binding of Abrin and APA-I. 2.5x 10
5
cells were incubated with different concentrations of Abrin-
FITC and APA-I-FITC for 45 min on ice. After two washes with PBS the bound conjugates were analyzed by
FACS. Data represents the mean fluorescence intensity of the samples at different concentrations over control.
Figure 4. DNA fragmentation by abrin and APA-I. Cells were cultured in the presence of varying
concentrations of abrin or agglutinin for a period of 12 h, 24 h (Jurkat) and 48 h, 72 h (MCF-7). After a brief
period of fixation with ethanol, cells were pelletted. After extraction using citrate phosphate buffer the DNA was
subjected to RNase and proteinase K digestion and analyzed on 1.5% agarose gels. A) Lanes 2, 6 -control 48 h,
4, 8-control 72 h , 3, 7-treated 48 h and 5,9-treated 72 h, B) Lanes 2,6 -control 12 h, 4, 8 control 24 h , 3, 7-
treated 12 h and 5,9-treated 24 h.
Figure 5. Apoptosis induced by abrin and APA-I in Jurkat cells and MCF-7 cells as determined by PI staining
and flow cytometry. Cells were cultured in the presence of abrin (10 ng/ml) or agglutinin (20 g/ml). After
which the cells were fixed, stained with PI and analyzed by flow cytometry. PBS-treated cells served as negative
control. The percentage of cells in sub-G1 peak was determined using WinMDI software.
Figure 6. APA-I induced apoptosis follows the intrinsic pathway of cell death. Jurkat cells and the Jurkat
clones, A3I9.2 and J16 were treated with abrin and APA-I for a period of 12 h, fixed with 70% ethanol, stained
with propidium iodide and analyzed by FACScan. Data represents the apoptosis in the samples over control.
Figure 7. Staining apoptotic nuclei with acridine orange and ethidium bromide. Cells were cultured in the
presence or absence of abrin and APA-I for 12 h. After the indicated time points, cells were pelleted, stained
with 3l of the dye mix and viewed under a fluorescence microscope using blue filter. Arrowheads indicate the
apoptotic bodies.
Figure 8. A cartoon representation, illustrating the APA-I molecule with domains shown in different colors. The
disulfide linkage between the toxin and the lectin chain at their respective C and N terminal is shown in ball and
stick model. The two tyrosine residues (Tyr73 and Tyr112) and the substrate binding residue, Pro199, are
shown by sticks.
Figure 9. (A) 2Fo-Fc omit maps around the Pro199, Tyr73 and Tyr112 residues (contoured at 1.0) is
shown here. (B) Shows the electron density of the sugars using Fo-Fc map contoured at 1 level. The residues
at which the N-glycosylation is occurring are N215-A, N100-B, and N140-B.
Figure 10. A view down the crystallographic two-fold axis of the APA-I heterotetramer (A-B heterodimer).
The cartoon representation shows the interacting A and A subunits of two A-B dimer and the arrowhead shows
the putative tetramerization interface. The three arginine residues namely Arg125, Arg134 and Arg181 are
shown by sticks and the corresponding symmetry related residues have been omitted for clarity. The disulfide
bonds linking chain A and chain B is shown by ball and stick model. The active site cleft is away from the
tetramerization interface.
a
t
I
N
D
I
A
N
I
N
S
T
O
F
S
C
I
E
N
C
E
o
n
A
p
r
i
l
2
9
,
2
0
1
4
h
t
t
p
:
/
/
w
w
w
.
j
b
c
.
o
r
g
/
D
o
w
n
l
o
a
d
e
d
f
r
o
m
13
Table1: Data-collection, Refinement statistics and the model parameters.
Data collection
Resolution limit () 30-3.5 (3.7-3.5)
*
Total reflections 13311
Unique reflections 11360
Completeness, % 95.7 (96..8)
Multiplicity 3.8 (3.8)
I / (I) 13.1 (2.3)
R
merge
, % 9.5 (53.9)
Mosaicity 0.25
Number of molecules in A. U. One dimer
Refinement statistics
Number of protein atoms 4029
Number of Carbohydrates 3
R
cryst,
% 19.4
R
free
% 25.4
RMS deviations
Bond distance () 0.013
Bond angles () 1.723
Luzzati coordinate error ()
Working set 0.525
Ramachandran plot statistics (%)
Residues in allowed regions 80.8
Residues in additionally allowed regions 18.5
Residues in generously allowed regions 0.7
Residues in disallowed regions 0.2
Mean B-factors (
2
) 51.88
* Parenthesis show high resolution shell
a
t
I
N
D
I
A
N
I
N
S
T
O
F
S
C
I
E
N
C
E
o
n
A
p
r
i
l
2
9
,
2
0
1
4
h
t
t
p
:
/
/
w
w
w
.
j
b
c
.
o
r
g
/
D
o
w
n
l
o
a
d
e
d
f
r
o
m
14
a
t
I
N
D
I
A
N
I
N
S
T
O
F
S
C
I
E
N
C
E
o
n
A
p
r
i
l
2
9
,
2
0
1
4
h
t
t
p
:
/
/
w
w
w
.
j
b
c
.
o
r
g
/
D
o
w
n
l
o
a
d
e
d
f
r
o
m
15
a
t
I
N
D
I
A
N
I
N
S
T
O
F
S
C
I
E
N
C
E
o
n
A
p
r
i
l
2
9
,
2
0
1
4
h
t
t
p
:
/
/
w
w
w
.
j
b
c
.
o
r
g
/
D
o
w
n
l
o
a
d
e
d
f
r
o
m
16
a
t
I
N
D
I
A
N
I
N
S
T
O
F
S
C
I
E
N
C
E
o
n
A
p
r
i
l
2
9
,
2
0
1
4
h
t
t
p
:
/
/
w
w
w
.
j
b
c
.
o
r
g
/
D
o
w
n
l
o
a
d
e
d
f
r
o
m
17
a
t
I
N
D
I
A
N
I
N
S
T
O
F
S
C
I
E
N
C
E
o
n
A
p
r
i
l
2
9
,
2
0
1
4
h
t
t
p
:
/
/
w
w
w
.
j
b
c
.
o
r
g
/
D
o
w
n
l
o
a
d
e
d
f
r
o
m
18
a
t
I
N
D
I
A
N
I
N
S
T
O
F
S
C
I
E
N
C
E
o
n
A
p
r
i
l
2
9
,
2
0
1
4
h
t
t
p
:
/
/
w
w
w
.
j
b
c
.
o
r
g
/
D
o
w
n
l
o
a
d
e
d
f
r
o
m
19
Figure 9A.
Figure 9B.
a
t
I
N
D
I
A
N
I
N
S
T
O
F
S
C
I
E
N
C
E
o
n
A
p
r
i
l
2
9
,
2
0
1
4
h
t
t
p
:
/
/
w
w
w
.
j
b
c
.
o
r
g
/
D
o
w
n
l
o
a
d
e
d
f
r
o
m
20
Figure 10.
a
t
I
N
D
I
A
N
I
N
S
T
O
F
S
C
I
E
N
C
E
o
n
A
p
r
i
l
2
9
,
2
0
1
4
h
t
t
p
:
/
/
w
w
w
.
j
b
c
.
o
r
g
/
D
o
w
n
l
o
a
d
e
d
f
r
o
m