You are on page 1of 8

The System of Environmental-Economic Accounts (SEEA)

Measurement Framework in Support of Sustainable Development and Green Economy Policy

A rst step towards the integraon of sustainability into economic management is the establishment of beer mea-
surement of the crucial role of the environment as a source of natural capital and as a sink for by-products generated
during the producon of man-made capital and other human acvies. As sustainable development encompasses social,
economic and environmental dimensions, it is also important that naonal accounng procedures are not restricted to
measuring the producon of goods and services that are convenonally remunerated...A program to develop naonal
systems of integrated environmental and economic accounng in all countries is proposed.
Chapter 8, Agenda 21
1 Introducon
Purpose of this brieng note...
The purpose of this brieng note is to inform how the SEEA,
the internaonal stascal standard for environmental-
economic accounts, can support sustainable development
and green economy policy.
The SEEA in response to policy demands...
Policy-makers and managers benet from consistent, com-
parable and comprehensive stascs and indicators when
an integrated accounng approach is used. Importantly, the
trade-os of their decisions that aect natural resources and
associated services are made explicit. The SEEA which was
adopted as an internaonal stascal standard for ocial
stascs by the Stascal Commission of the United Naons
at its 43rd session in 2012 is based on this accounng ap-
Relevant in a data poor environment ...
The SEEA is relevant in a data poor environment by idenfy-
ing the data gaps and improving consistency. Internaonal
agencies and donors need to contribute to the implementa-
on of the framework.
The SEEA in response to Agenda 21...
Twenty years ago Agenda 21 idened the need for a sys-
tems approach to monitoring the transion to sustainable
development and proposed a specic soluon: the develop-
ment of integrated environmental and economic accounts.
Over the past two decades, the internaonal ocial stas-
cs and accounng communies have responded to this
need through a rigorous and global process to develop a
Systemof Environmental-Economic Accounts (SEEA) within
the broader set of internaonal stascal standards.
A crical lesson from Agenda 21 is that integrated policy
decision-making is crucial. This requires greater integra-
on of the stascal evidence that informs policy. Un-
fortunately, in many cases, the producon and dissemina-
on of stascs relevant to sustainable development has
remained relavely disparate, following the tradional in-
formaon silo based organizaon rather than using a sys-
tems approach. Moreover, given that data collecon oen
involves many dierent agencies with dierent scopes of re-
sponsibility, there is usually limited collaboraon in the col-
lecon, management and sharing of data across instuons,
parcularly on environmentally related topics.
The role of the SEEA ...
The SEEA provides the internaonally moderated frame-
work for reversing the historical informaon silo approach
to stascs and for providing indicators that directly re-
spond to the demand of integrated policy-making. Indi-
cators related to iniaves such as beyond GDP, Green
Economy, Green Growth, measuring progress of soci-
ees, and beer life, all t under the umbrella of sustain-
able development. Taking just a few examples, indicators
derived from the accounts provide the measures for the fol-
lowing policy quesons:
Who benets from natural resource use? What are
the impacts on the state of the environment and on
other sectors of the economy?
How does depleon of natural resources aect mea-
sures of the real income of a naon? Are the deple-
on costs recovered by the government? What is the
composion of the wealth of a naon?
Are current trends in producon and consumpon of
resources sustainable? What economic instruments
are in place? And what is the impact of new instru-
Box 1: SEEA in pracce: The Philippines
The Philippines has a decentralized stascal system consisng of a policy-making and coordinang body, a general
purpose stascs producing agency, a stascal research and training center, and various government agencies
engaged in the generaon of stascal informaon. The Naonal Stascal Coordinaon Board (NSCB) is the highest
policy-making body on stascal maers, and plays a central role in coordinang stascal acvies. For example, it
is mandated to compile the System of Naonal Accounts by integrang the informaon from various data producing
agencies in the country.
The Philippines has established an Inter-Agency Commiee on Environment and Natural Resource Stascs (IACENRS)
with the objecve of coordinang acvies in the generaon of environment stascs, the integraon of stascs into
the environmental-economic accounts, and the derivaon of indicators. The Commiee brings together the government
agencies responsible for designing environmental policies and data producon, including the geo-spaal agency and
the business community. It agrees on priories and data collecon requirements, idenes data gaps and overlaps,
determines meliness and data quality expectaons, outlines disseminaon policies, and seeks ways to improve the
eciency and cost eecveness of the data producon process.
The Philippines has a long history in the implementaon of the SEEA under the leadership of the NSCB. The Philippines
started implementaon of the SEEA in 1998 as a pilot project with the funding of UNDP and the technical assistance
of the UN Stascs Division. The pilot compilaon included the following accounts: forests, sh, water, mineral and
energy, and land and soil.
Since the 1998 pilot project, the Philippines has formally instuonalized the SEEA and IACENRS has adopted the SEEA
as the supporng framework for integrated policies on the economy and the environment. The NSCB has been given
the task to integrate the basic data produced by the dierent agencies in the SEEA accounts and tables. In the new
2012-2017 Philippines Stascal Development Programme a separate chapter on the environment has been devoted to
the adopon of the revised SEEA as one of the acvies under this program.
Source: Naonal Stascal Coordinaon Board
2 Accounng and integrated informa-
on systems
The importance of accounts for the environment...
The importance of the SEEA has long been recognized.
Chapter 8 of Agenda 21 Integrang Environment and De-
velopment in Decision-Making called for establishing the
SEEA (1993) in all member countries to obtain a beer
measurement of the crucial role of the environment as a
source of natural capital and as a sink of by-products gener-
ated during the producon of man-made capital and other
human acvies. It also requested the UN Stascal Divi-
sion in collaboraon with other relevant internaonal orga-
nizaons to further develop, test rene and standardize the
provisional concepts and methods proposed in the 1993
Elevaon to an internaonal stascal standard...
In recent years there has been an extensive eort to revise
the SEEA and elevate it to an internaonal stascal stan-
dard, taking into account new thinking in the measurement
of environmental issues as well as established country expe-
riences in implementaon. The revised SEEA has undergone
a wide consultaon process led by the UN Commiee of Ex-
perts of Environmental-Economic Accounng (UNCEEA), an
intergovernmental body under the auspices of the UN Sta-
scal Commission. The global consultaon involved coun-
tries at dierent stages of development from all regions, as
well as internaonal partners including mulple UN agen-
cies, World Bank, IMF, OECD and the European Commission.
The SEEA ulizes the principles of economic accounng,
building on the exisng System of Naonal Accounts (SNA).
The SEEA accounts bring into direct focus the relaon-
ship between the environment and well-being not revealed
through tradional measures of economic acvity, such as
GDP and naonal income.
The SEEA does not propose or recommend any single indica-
tor or basket of indicators for use in developing and assess-
ing policy. Indeed some of its major strengths are in its ap-
proachtointegrang stascs toallowfor mulple purposes
and mulple scales of analysis. However, there are several
key aggregates and indicators that are directly derived from
the accounng tables and are of interest to policy analysis
and goal-seng.
Consistent, comparable, coherent stascs and indica-
Figure 1 below illustrates the role of the SEEA in the stas-
cal system.
Figure 1: The informaon pyramid
Box 2: SEEA in pracce: European Union
The countries of the European Union (EU) have been working for many years developing environmental accounts of the
kind included in the SEEA.
A number of manuals have been produced relang to key parts of SEEA such as air emissions, material ows, envi-
ronmental protecon expenditure, environmental goods and services sector, forest accounts, etc. These are praccal
guides aimed mainly at compliers which reect and embody the experience of the most advanced EU countries.
In July 2011 the European Parliament and Council adopted the rst EURegulaon (an EUlaw) on environmental accounts
which requires all Member States to compile annual data for three modules in a rst stage:
Environmental taxes
Emissions to air of 14 substances by industries (ISIC 2-digit) and households
Economy-wide material ow accounts showing domesc extracon, imports and exports of some 40 materials
The data is to be collected according to a standard form and metable, with rst data delivery at the end of 2013.
In fact much of this data is already being collected on a voluntary basis and is published on Eurostats web site
A second set of modules is being prepared by Eurostat for a future update of the Regulaon, including environmental
protecon expenditure, environmental goods and services and energy supply and use by industries and households. One
recent example illustrates the analycal possibilies of integrated environmental-economic accounng. Starng from
the air emissions recorded against the industries and acvies that generated them and passing though an input-output
table, it is possible to reallocate the emissions to the nal use categories that indirectly caused them (consumpon
perspecve). The results interesngly show that the EU induces emissions in other parts of the world through imports,
but only for about the same amount as the EU export.
Domesc and global CO2-emissions - producon and consumpon perspecve, EU27 2006 (tonnes per capita)
Source: Eurostat
Starng from the basic economic, environmental and socio-
demographic stascs, the SEEA organizes and reconciles
them using accounng concepts and structure to obtain
me series of consistent, comparable and coherent stas-
cs and indicators and to facilitate the linkages with ocial
stascs. While the indicators can be derived from basic
stascs, the use of the accounts ensures that the indica-
tors are consistent because their component data are de-
rived from a common framework. As a result the signals of
the stascs and indicators are coherent.
From stascs to accounts...
The UN Framework for the Development of Environment
Stascs (FDES, currently under revision) provides the con-
ceptual foundaon and structure for organizing environ-
ment stascs.
The SEEA provides a comprehensive conceptual accounng
framework which brings together the blocks represenng
basic economic, environment and socio-demographic stas-
cs and describes the relaonship between them as illus-
trated in Figure 2.
Figure 2: From stascs to accounts
In addion to economic and socio-demographic stascs,
Box 3: SEEA in pracce: South Africa
South Africa is commied to implement the SEEA with Stascs South Africa, the agency mandated by law to produce
stascs and declare stascs as ocial, coordinang the implementaon. Several accounts have already been compiled
on an experimental basis and South Africa plans to instuonalize the SEEA on an incremental basis, starng from the
mineral and energy accounts.
Tradionally, stascs in South Africa related to environmental issues such as water, minerals, energy, climate change and
biodiversity have been fragmented. To fulll its mandate, Stascs South Africa embarked on a process to strengthen
instuonal arrangements with other line Ministries in order to systemacally develop a series of environmental-
economic accounts guided by the SEEA-framework. This led to the formaon of inter-departmental working groups to
address the data and quality gaps between basic stascs, environmental indicators and the accounts. In recent years
environmental-economic accounts have been developed in four areas of focus, namely Water (2000), Minerals (1980
2008), Energy (2002 2006) and Fisheries (1990 2008).
Internaonal cooperaon has provided the impetus and guidance for the development of the accounts in South Africa.
Given the rich datasets that are required to produce detailed accounts, the South African environmental-economic
accounts are not comprehensive, but the work achieved thus far paves the way for future renement of stascs and
indicators and for improved collaboraon between the agencies that are involved.
Source: Stascs South Africa
the SEEArelies on basic environment stascs such as stas-
cs on natural resources such as water, energy, forest, ows
of materials and pollutants which are usually collected for
specic purposes. The SEEA adds value to individual infor-
maon components by bringing themtogether to informin-
tegrated policies, evaluate trade-os between dierent poli-
cies and evaluate their impacts across domains of the econ-
omy, the environment and society.
The SEEA conceptual accounng framework is equally appli-
cable for data rich and data poor environments. While in a
data rich environment the SEEAconfronts and reconciles the
basic component data, in a data poor environment it iden-
es data gaps and provides the structure for the imputaon
of missing data.
Connecon to DPSIR...
Stascs and indicators derived from the SEEA can be com-
municated through the DPSIR framework. The Driving
forces, Pressure, State, Response framework describes a
step-wise causal chain between economic acvity and im-
pacts on ecosystems.
Figure 3: The DPSIR framework
Responses are management responses to address environ-
mental problems, such as environmental protecon and re-
source management expenditures and environmental taxes.
Driving forces are anthropogenic acvies that cause pres-
sure on ecosystems. Pressures are direct stresses from an-
thropogenic acvies to ecosystems such as emissions to
air, water and waste, release of excessive nutrients. State
refers to the state of ecosystems in terms of its capacity
to provide services to humanity and the condions of the
environment. Impacts are the measures of changes in the
ecosystemcondions such as depleon of natural resources
and degradaon of ecosystems condions.
The monitoring framework, the SEEA, informs the policy
framework (see Figure 4) through stascs and indicators
that may be communicated through the DPSIR framework.
3 Sustainable development policy and
informaon requirements
Informing dierent policy perspecves...
Figure 4 presents sustainable development policy areas ac-
cording to four simple quadrants related to howinformaon
is derived from the SEEA. The rst quadrant, Improving ac-
cess to services and resources, refers to policies that aim to
ensure that households have access to appropriate, reliable
and aordable resources and services. Scarcity, as experi-
enced by individuals, is not only about absolute volumes of
resources in a country, but also accessibility. The SEEA can
provide a range of measures to guide policymakers in assess-
ing and managing performance of providers of crical ser-
vices such as water and energy. They include the following
Current and capital costs associated with the provi-
sion of the services and their nancing;
Losses in distribuon;
Quanty of resource used.
Report of the Issue Management Group on Green Economy Working towards a balanced and inclusive green economy A United Naons System-wide
Perspecve(UN Environmental Management Group (EMG 2011)
The second quadrant, Managing supply and demand, refers
to the allocaon of natural resources for meeng the needs
of current and future generaons in relaon to the available
endowments. Relevant measures derived from the SEEA in-
clude the following key aggregates and indicators:
Resource use of producon and consumpon;
Generaon of emissions and waste by economic ac-
vity and households.
Figure 4: SEEA and sustainable development policy
Resource eciency;
Decoupling indicators for emissions and resource use;
Carbon and energy embedded into products;
Environmental goods and services;
Green jobs;
Environmentally-adjusted aggregates for depleon
(e.g. net savings or environmentally-adjusted value
Resource rent;
Investment in infrastructure.
The third quadrant, Improving the state of the environment
and reducing impacts, recognizes the potenal for economic
acvies to cause harm and the potenal to protect or re-
store natural capital for future benet. The SEEAprovides an
agreed approach for internaonally comparable measures
such as:
Stocks of natural resources;
Emissions into water, air and soil and waste genera-
Environmental protecon expenditures and resource
Land use and land cover;
Condions and health of ecosystems;
Regulatory services provided by ecosystems;
Economic instruments to reduce impacts.
The SEEA is also developing best pracces on measures such
Condions and health of ecosystems;
Regulatory services provided by ecosystems ;
Finally, the fourth quadrant, Mitigating risks and adapting
to extreme events, refers to policies that aim to reduce hu-
man, economic and ecological harmcreated by extreme nat-
ural events and changing environmental paerns. Measures
that inform this quadrant include:
Greenhouse gas emissions by type of economic acv-
Expenditures on migaon (e.g. technologies);
Expenditures for adaptaon to extreme events (e.g.
dykes, etc.).
4 Implementaon of the SEEA
Countries adopng the framework...
Although the SEEA is a relavely new approach in the de-
velopment of integrated naonal accounts for the environ-
ment, more and more countries are compiling or planning to
compile environmental accounts. Environmental accounts
do not necessarily require a large amount of data. On the
contrary, the SEEA provides the organizaonal structure to
bring all the available data together to improve understand-
ing of their interrelaonships and verify consistency. This fa-
cilitates the idencaon of data gaps and overlaps as well
as the improvement the quality of the data.
Box 4: SEEA in pracce: China
Chinas rapid economic expansion over the past three decades has delivered a measured annual growth rate in GDP
of around 10 per cent per annum. There are increasing concerns among policymakers and the public in China about
environmental issues such as natural resource depleon and environmental degradaon.
In response to an increasing demand for integrated environmental and development policies, the Naonal Bureau of
Stascs of China (NBS) has adopted the SEEA as the stascal framework for measuring inter-relaonships between the
economy and the environment. Over an extended period of me, the NBS has cooperated with a range of government
agencies including the Ministry of Land and Minerals, Ministry of Environment Protecon, State Forestry Administraon,
and the Ministry of Water Resources to develop SEEA accounts.
The NBS, working together with Stascs Canada, Stascs Norway and the United Naons Stascs Division, has
compiled (on a pilot basis) the following physical and monetary accounts for China with the goal of instuonalizing the
SEEA: mber resources, energy ow and stock accounts, water accounts (including accounng for emissions to water),
mineral accounts, and air emission accounts.
Source: Naonal Bureau of Stascs of China
Box 5: SEEA in pracce: Australia
Australia is an industrialized naon with a range of environmental resources and unique ora and fauna. The countrys
climate varies widely with a tropical north, temperate south, and a semi-arid center. Annual rainfall varies substanally
across the Australian connent, with large seasonal variaons. Like most countries, Australia faces signicant environ-
mental challenges, parcularly with regard to climate, water and energy.
Australias populaon is concentrated in the south-east, where water is oen a relavely scarce resource. An increasing
populaon and growing economic demands compete with naonally signicant environmental assets for use of the
water, and its management is therefore crucial and aracts considerable public aenon. The Australian Bureau of
Stascs (ABS) producon of SEEA accounts for water have provided a consistent and enduring framework to manage
this water, and are a good example of how integrated informaon can eecvely guide complex decision-making
The ABS commenced the producon of environmental-economic accounts in the mid-1990s, with the release of a
natural resource account presenng energy resources; producon, conversion and consumpon; as well as emissions
discharged into the natural environment. Since then, the ABS has produced a range of other environmental-economic
accounts, including accounts for water, energy, land and environmental protecon expenditure (EPE). The ABS now
produces water and energy accounts annually, and is connuing to expand its suite of regular environmental-economic
accounts to meet policy demands.
Source: Australian Bureau of Stascs
Also developing countries adopng the SEEA...
The SEEA can be implemented in countries which are at var-
ious stages of development. The implementaon of the
framework can be incremental starng from very aggre-
gated tables and accounts that can be disaggregated based
on policy needs and data development. Increased use of the
framework should lead to improvements in the availability
and quality of the data and the informaon base that sup-
ports the development and assessment of policies that have
an impact on the environment.
Countries will have to make changes to their naonal eco-
nomic accounts in order to have more detailed informaon
about the natural resource asset accounts, material owand
polluon accounts
As the framework is implemented at naonal and sub-
naonal levels it will become increasingly easier toshare and
compare informaon over me and space.
5 Subsystems of the SEEA
The SEEA-Water and the SEEA-Energy are two subsystems
of the SEEA. They elaborate and build on the concepts of
the SEEAwhile maintaining close links with the concepts and
terminology of the specic subject areas.
The SEEA-Water, a subsystem of the SEEA, provides a con-
ceptual framework to support water policy design and eval-
uaon. The SEEA-Water was adopted by the United Naons
Stascal Commission (UNSC) in 2007. As part of the imple-
mentaon of the framework the Internaonal Recommen-
daons for Water Stascs (IRWS) were also developed and
adopted by the UNSC in 2010. IRWS provides the list of data
items and methods of collecon for water stascs.
The SEEA-Water framework sets the basis for compiling a full
spectrum of informaon to answer a wide variety of policy
quesons, such as:
What are the investments in water supply and sani-
taon services? How are the costs being recovered?
Are the services aordable to the populaon?
Are water resources being used sustainably? Who
benets in the allocaon of scarce water resources?
What are the trade-os of water re-allocaons?
Are the levels of pollutants emied to water accept-
able? Are they decreasing? What investments are
made for the purpose of reducing pollutant emis-
What are the economic losses associated to oods
and droughts? What investments are associated with
reducing ood and drought risks?
Work is currently underway to nalize SEEA-Energy. SEEA-
Energy can inform on progress across the full spectrum of
energy related maers. For example, for those concerned
with an environmentally sustainable energy supply that ad-
dresses socioeconomic needs, it informs the following policy
Do we have an aordable, economically sustainable
and environmentally sustainable energy supply?
What is the mix of energy products used - and who
are the various users of these products? What are the
emissions generated by this energy mix? How does
this supply and use of energy impact on the full range
of related economic measures, for example, energy
prices paid, energy expenditures as a proporon of
household income or business income, prots earned
and so on?
What is the expected (and actual) impact of various
policies on the environment; and on household and
business expenditure, business income, taxes and so
on? Or, for example, how would incenves to invest
in renewable energy impact on industry emissions?
Furthermore what types of incenves are being used
(subsidies, grants etc), what is their size, and who is
nancing them? What are the changes in the contri-
buon of renewable energy to total energy use over
Box 6: SEEA in pracce: The Netherlands
Stascs Netherlands has a long history in environmental accounng. During the inial phase in the early 1990s,
accounts were developed for air emissions, water emissions, waste, energy, water and environmental expenditure.
Recently Stascs Netherlands has gradually extended the Dutch System of Environmental-Economic Accounng by
compiling newaccounts on material ows, the environmental goods and service sector, emission permits, etc. The Dutch
environmental accounts are compiled following the general concepts, denions and classicaons as described in SEEA.
One important new applicaon of the Dutch environmental accounts is the compilaon of indicators for green growth
/ green economy (Stascs Netherlands, 2011). Green growth fosters economic growth and development while
ensuring that natural resources can connue to provide the ecosystem services on which our well-being relies. Both on
a naonal and internaonal level there is much interest in monitoring the transion towards green growth. Following
the approach of the OECD (2011), indicators were compiled for four themes: indicators reecng the environmental
eciency of producon, indicators of the natural asset base, indicators monitoring the environmental quality of life,
and indicators describing policy responses and economic opportunies. The majority of the indicators could directly be
derived from the Dutch System of Environmental-Economic Accounng which provides a good measurement framework
for green growth, as it integrates economic and environment stascs.
The indicators were assigned two scores: one with respect to the trend in greening growth, and one for idened policy
targets (see Table). The scores for environmental eciency indicators are based on decoupling. Decoupling occurs when
the growth rate of an indicator of environmental pressure is lower than the rate of economic growth in a given period.
Decoupling can be either absolute or relave. With regard to green growth, the ulmate goal is absolute decoupling, as
only this will reduce the absolute burden for the environment. Indicators that cannot be linked to economic growth are
assigned a score based on the evaluaon of their trends. The presented indicator scores for policy targets were obtained
from the Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency. It was not possible to idenfy policy targets for all indicators.
The policy targets are primarily included to provide background informaon to the presented trends.
Preliminary Scores of Green Growth Indicators
Group Indicator Time series Trend Policy targets
Environmental Producon-based greenhouse gas intensity 19902009 Relave decoupling Likely to be met
eciency Consumpon-based greenhouse gas emissions 19962009 Relave decoupling -
Energy eciency 19902009 Relave decoupling -
Renewable energy 19902009 Improvement Unlikely to be met
Nutrient surpluses 19902009 Absolute decoupling Likely to be met
Material intensity 19962008 Relave decoupling -
Water use intensity 19902009 Absolute decoupling -
Water treatment 19852008 Improvement Likely to be met
Natural Stocks of standing mber 19902005 Improvement Unlikely to be met
asset base Fish inputs 19962008 Deterioraon -
Natural gas reserves 19962010 Deterioraon -
Land conversion into built-up land 19002006 - -
Threat to biodiversity 19942005 Deterioraon Unlikely to be met
Quality of life Polluon induced health problems 19802000 Imporvement -
Policy Green patents 20002006 Increase -
responses Share of green taxes 19902009 Increase -
Energy prices 19902009 - -
Carbon trade 20052009 - -
Environmental investments 19902007 Stable -
Green jobs 19952008 Increase -
-not possible to score, no policy target idened or inconclusive trend
The main conclusion of the rst Dutch green growth report is that the environmental eciency of producon in
the Netherlands has improved. Although greenhouse gas emissions and consumpon of materials for producon have
increased, they have done so at a slower rate than economic growth. The indicators on stocks of natural resources, policy
responses and economic opportunies paint a mixed picture. On the one hand, stocks of natural gas have declined, but
on the other the volume of standing mber has increased. Furthermore while green jobs and green patents account for a
larger share of the labour market and innovaons respecvely, investments in green capital goods are below mid-1990s
Sources: Stascs Netherlands (2011). Green growth in the Netherlands. The Hague/Heerlen: Stascs Netherlands;
OECD (2011). Green Growth Strategy Synthesis Report. C(2011)29. Paris: OECD.
Sustainability goals..
Water and energy are essenal for achieving equitable and
sustainable social and economic development. Water and
energy security require improving the management of wa-
ter and energy resources. These are necessary condions
for achieving many MillenniumDevelopment Goals (MDGs),
such as eradicang extreme poverty and hunger, achieving
universal primary educaon, promong gender equality and
womens empowerment, reducing child mortality, improv-
ing maternal health, combang major diseases, and ensur-
ing environmental sustainability.
Also developing countries adopt water and energy ac-
The SEEA-Water and SEEA-Energy can be implemented in
countries which are at various stages of development. The
implementaon of the frameworks can be incremental
starng from very aggregated tables and accounts that can
be disaggregated based on policy needs and data develop-
Increased use of the frameworks should lead to improve-
ments in the availability and quality of the data and the in-
formaon base that supports the development and assess-
ment of policies that have an impact on water and energy.
As the frameworks are implemented at naonal and sub-
naonal levels it will become increasingly easier toshare and
compare informaon over me and space.
6 Conclusions and recommendaons
The examples above provide a preliminary and limited pre-
viewof the possibilies of the SEEAin relaon to sustainable
development policy. The SEEA is a mul-purpose tool that
can serve a variety of monitoring purposes related to sus-
Donors need to contribute to implementaon...
The advantage of implemenng the SEEA comes from the
benets of integrang environmental and economic infor-
maon in an internaonally agreed framework, using com-
mon denions, classicaons, and accounng rules.
In order to realize the full potenal of the SEEA, coopera-
on and commitment at the naonal and internaonal level
is required.
Internaonal agencies and donors need to contribute to the
implementaon of the SEEA, including through program-
mac support to instuons in developing economies to im-
prove their capacity to collect, organize, interpret, and com-
municate the relevant data.
Building a commitment in countries...
At the naonal level, considering the many instuons that
either produce or use environmental informaon, it is im-
portant to create appropriate instuonal arrangements for
coordinaon purposes. Usually the naonal stascal of-
ces or other agencies that compile naonal economic ac-
counts are important coordinators in the compilaon of the
Implementaon of the SEEA can take a step-wise approach
and each individual country will need to establish its own
priories for measurement. But the rst step is to build a
commitment in countries in support of the SEEA implemen-
taon to help meet their sustainable development monitor-
ing needs.
For further informaon on this brieng note, contact