A NEW SOLUTION FOR CANCER

„Yamanaka and Gurdon discovered that mature and specialized cells "can be
(nervously also?!) reprogrammed to become immature cells capable of
developing into all tissues of the body," the Nobel Assembly at Sweden's
Karolinska Institute said.” http://www.japantimes.co.jp/text/nn20121009a1.html

That's (exactly like) the cancer, folks!
„…

CONTENTS® ©i985

//garfield.library.upenn.edu/classics1985/A1985AEP1600002.pd
http://garfield.library.upenn.edu/classics1985/A1985AEP1600002.
http://garfield.library.upenn.edu/classics1985/A1985AEP1600002 . I

hhttp://garfield.library.upenn.edu/classics1985/A1985AEP1600002.pdf
http://garfield.library.upenn.edu/classics1985/A1985AEP1600002.pdfSI® L

In 1957, a physician researcher out of the National Cancer Institute, Richmond Prehn, M.D.,
published a landmark study co-authored with his laboratory assistant, Joan M. Main. Its findings
turned conventional wisdom about cancer and the immune system on its head.
What they discovered was that surgically removing tumors from sarcoma-ridden mice not only cured
the mice of cancer – the treated mice also were immune to all subsequent efforts to reinoculate them
with the same sarcoma.

“Prehn and Malin were revolutionary,” Dr. Curti says. “Before their 1957 study, even the suggestion
that the immune system had a role to play in cancer treatment would have been regarded in many
scientific circles with skepticism. Now the hope was that new cancer therapies and vaccines could be
developed that would rival both chemotherapy and radiation in their effectiveness.”
But despite thousands of attempts to capitalize on Prehn and Main’s success, that hope has gone
largely unrealized.
“What we have learned is that a successful immune system response in humans depends on not just
one event, but a series of events – from the presentation of a foreign marker on the surface of the
cancer cell to the homing behavior of killer T-cells to the tumor site,” Dr. Curti says. “These are like
links in a chain, and any weak link can spell disaster for an effective immune system response.”
http://oregon.providence.org/patients/facilities/providence-portland-medicalcenter/Pages/formsandinformationlanding.aspx?&TemplateName=Bringing+out+the+big+guns+to+ki
ll+cancer&TemplateType=FormsandInstructions
In the past time, at this address, were also made references to this material.
There is a similarity between the approach of Prehn and Main and surgical method of denervation of
solid tumors (ablation and their quasi immediate inoculation to the same animal), theoretically
fundamented as the treatment of the cancer in Gravitational Theory of Life.
Based on this procedural similarities and on the recovery situation of Prehn and Main results („But
despite thousands of attempts to capitalize on Prehn and Main’s success, that hope has gone largely
unrealized.”) I used this material as a possible experimental prove of the validity of the

principle of denervation in curing solid tumors (together with the chemical method which
follows the same principle contained also in the U.S. patent below, without that the
denervation to be included among the claims):

http://www.patentlens.net/patentlens/patents.html?patnums=US_2005_0031648_A1&language=&).

Page. 16 of the patent (paragraph [0189])
shows that the author considers the "denervation" but that it is only noted not being the objective
pursued (because the "denervation" it must be permanent, until the tumor death).

On page 17 (paragraph [0195])
there is surprisingly long therapeutic effect occurring by the denervation process. And so on.
Why incumbent now on this subject?
First to emphasize that this context was provided and published (11/25/2001, "Libertatea" newspaper,
see posts from this address):
"I was thinking and at the possibility of avoiding the surgery. Is possible the local injection of a
substance that inhibits the nervous information flow in that area. Such kind of intervention may

simplify things", says surgeon Dorel Manu.

But mostly for that the logic of placement of immune system at the base of the processes
highlighted by Prehn and Main (which I couldn't totally dismantle until now) is wrong.
This is what finds also Dr. Curti in the above material: things are more complicated. There
are relationships between different processes which appear to be like a closed chain. Under
these conditions the positions of "cause" and "effect" are entirely relative: they keeps

changing. Proof on this behavior of processes is the Winn test:

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3018371/
It shows that, at a linear evolution of ratio of quantity of immune reactants / quantity of
„target" tissue, the growth process is nonlinear. I.e. the two values (the ratio and the growth)
keeps changing the role of "cause" (as in the case of x and y in a second degree equation: both
can take new values simultaneously and independently, so that may arise the situation in
which at one y value may be assigned two distinct values of x). It result that this connection
is not causal. So, it is controlled from the outside. And "outside" of the biochemical processes
can be only the electric signals.
Let's say it's just coincidence. But the most significant element passed unnoticed until now
(at least for me):

„…NOW PUTATIVELY IMMUNIZED ANIMALS.”?!

What is this? They could be immunized but, as a researcher, you must don't have
preconceived ideas:
"In fact, the direct "observation" processes are completely ignored in an experiment.
Experiments means only protocols that lead from the "cause" to the "effect".
The "cause" and the "effect" are arbitrary categories, chosen on the basis of some formally
considered „signals": the objects and phenomena do not inherently contain these principles.
It is well-known the situation where objects and / or phenomena have changed arbitrarily
their status: from "cause" to "effect" and vice versa, depending on the "theory" that it shape
them. "Signals" perceived by many individuals (which generates "conventions") have a role in
this process.”(SUNT „CIMPANZEU”), posted in Romanian).
And "immunization" must refers to a pathogen not to a process.
I.e. the term can possibly refer to METILCOLANTREN not to a tumor (the disease itself).
Don't remove the lung affected by tuberculosis for his reintroduction in the body but you
must do the immunization of the body against Mycobacterium tuberculosis.
http://ro.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vaccin)
In other words, there it was exclusively about the denervated tumors, now "visible" to the
immune system. In this case the experiments of Prehn and Main are an incontestable proof of
effectiveness of treatment by the method of denervation of solid tumors.
By this way, I demand again the Ministry of Health to answer at my previous steps:

I created a theory which aims to establish a clear relationship between scientific formalism
and how it is generated: by the organisms, in general, and by the "intelligent" organisms, in
particular. From there it resulting a model of the genesis of cancer.
It is suggested by "François Jacob, Logic of living, Romanian Encyclopedic Publishing House, Bucharest, 1972, pp.
338:

„Even if the injury (which produces cancer - my note) begins in the nucleus or cytoplasm,
or its origins are in a somatic mutation, or in the presence of a virus or a circuit disturbance,
everything that prevents cell to receiving a signal, can removing it outside of community.
Understanding cancer involves the entering in the logic of the system which imposes for the
cells the constraints of the body.”
And are motivated and some methods of treatment induced by this approach, which have
been successfully tested (but illegally) on people in Romania. More information can be found
at http://www.scribd.com/jfkusa.
The system „moves on" on this direction in a very hard way. If you are interested,
I'm waiting for a feedback.
Sincerely,
Eng. Phys. Gabriel Pascu, phone: +40733846532

Methods for treating diverse cancers:

- Gerovital
- By local administration of Lidocaine to or
to the vicinity of the cancer (maintaining the
continuous denervation until the death of the
tumor).

There exists the Gravitational Theory of
Life confirmation, in the cancer cure
problem!
I just found (June, 3) an interesting material:
http://ar.iiarjournals.org/content/24/2B/1003.full.pdf.
I stressed the following regarding the role of the nervous system in cancer pathology
and that this specific mechanism was not known at the time (2004):
Cancer survival decreases in patients experiencing various psychosocial stresses (1), suggesting a potential role
for the central nervous system in progression of malignancy.
Specifically, stress- induced changes in neuroendocrine and immune functions may contribute to cancer
mortality (2). Stress not only alters the neuroendocrine system, but also modifies sensory nerve function.
1. Neurons sensitive to capsaicin mediate inflammatory pain and are important targets for management of
chronic pain. These neurons also regulate local tissue homeostasis, inflammation, healing and development,
especially under conditions of psychological stress.
That is totally wrong! These people have not heard of Professor Daniel Danielopolu and "interstimulant
antagonism”.
http://www.mayoclinicproceedings.org/article/S0025-6196%2811%2961064-1/fulltext
These neurons can't control homeostasis, etc..., only by themselves! But only with the motor neurons
(motoneurons)! And this error will manifest in interpreting the data (see below).
Stress contributes to increased cancer recurrence and metastasis through as yet undefined mechanisms.
That is a statement which must to be noticed!
Likewise, activity of capsaicin-sensitive neurons is altered by pathological conditions that may lead to metastatic
growth (e.g. stress). Therefore, we examined effects of a treatment that induces sensory nerve denervation on breast
cancer metastases.
The present study was designed to test the hypothesis that CSFs (capsaicinsensitive
sensory nerve fibers) influence the capacity of cancer cells to metastasize.

Considering these observations, we expected diminished metastasis following denervation by capsaicin
treatment. However, we observed the opposite: metastasis to vital organs increased.

Very interesting: this approach is probably among the few in the world (yet I do not
know some others) which refers strictly to the denervation principle. Even in the U.S.
patent, on the use of botulinum toxin (mentioned above) the denervation is just a collateral
phenomenon to which it refers. These expectations, very specific, maybe follows the
publication, in Romania, of materials relating to the Gravitational Ttheory of Life, first
time in 2001. The time will answer this question.
Although, apparently, the experiment had negative results, below I will demonstrate that,
at least this experiment is an undeniable proof of the validity of methods of cancer
treatment based on the principle of denervation (resulting from Gravitational Theory of
Life).
I get back to what I said above (“Cancer’s secrets”) in relation to the mechanism of
formal removal of a structure from the general context of the body (which is equivalent
with a physical damage for it):
“So, is reached the inaccurate situation in which "THE PART” leads on "THE
WHOLE"! This is also the essence of the process of "learning": subjecting the "body"
of a single type of stimulus, exclusively and repeated, with higher frequency than that at
which body can return, every time, at the initial state (and, thus, to maintaining the
global state of homeostasis, relative to normal environmental conditions). Forcing him to
react only with the structures imposed by the nature of that stimulus, is generated the
pulling out of these specific structures from the general context of functioning of the
body (which means a really physical "aggression").”
The nuance which should be emphasized is that the process of "learning" is identical to
any other process carried out by repetition and which, by default, generates stress.
And stress is a physical assault even though, by its nature (purely formal) cannot be
described as the effect of a physical causes, narrowly defined in time and space.
It is produced by repetition, with a frequency value over a certain limit, of any kind of
stimulus that generate only repeated partial reactions, initially by conditioned reflex
mechanisms (rational), and after that, only by reflex mechanisms (e.g. riding a bicycle).
I described above the model of the Gravitational Theory of Life relative to that type of
stimulus, and his role in the evolution of the processes that lead to cancer.
On the basis of that "unexpected" results, in part of “discussions", it says that
denervation process with capsaicin did not directly intensified in metastasis.
As I stated above,

These kinds of reactions, generated by the system, are covered by the experiment in
question.
If the tumor grows and the system which must check the growth (the sensitive system) is
removed from his function at what can we expect? It makes sense that the tumor(s) will
grow easier. Then why there were some different expectations (such as that this kind of
treatment has to lead at the stop of tumor evolution)?

Through “interstimulant antagonism“ mechanism, the activity of the parasympathetic
autonomous system, responsible for malignant processes (and, thus, for the “replacing” of
healthy tissue) from the stroma, according to the experimental protocol, should be
intensified.
And this is what it happened!
In short, in this experiment was performed the denervation of the "system” not of the
tumor (it was operated at the sensitive, sympathetic level of autonomic nervous system).
So the tumor was free to grow and "roam" at will until a certain time when they felt the
effects of atropine. Atropine (It is a competitive antagonist for the muscarinic acetylcholine
receptor. It is classified as year anticholinergic drug (parasympatholytic –
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atropine) was used for “technical" reasons, and obviously at the
parasympathetic levels (effectors cells – “Atropine (5 mg / kg, ip) administered was
immediately before capsaicin injection to prevent acute effects of cardiopulmonary sensory
mediators released excessively”).
In accordance with the model from above (see “Cancer’s secrets”), the results of this
experiment are perfectly explicable: the mechanism is accelerating, then is modulating (due
to the “interstimulant antagonism"), the process of metastasis.
The tumor is an effecting structure! At this level you had to act (see U.S. Patent)!
The fact that all phenomena described in this experiment are entirely modeled by
Gravitational Theory of Life it is one (at least) indisputable proof of the validity of the
conclusions of this theory!
Lidocaine is a potential cancer treatment solution for treating diverse cancers by local
administration (to or to the vicinity of the cancer) in a manner which will maintain a
constant state of local denervation, until the death of the tumor.
That complies with the principles set forth above, and which, most probably, has not been
used as such, nowhere in the world.
It’s time for it!
See also: US patent
U.S. 2005/0031648 A1, Pub Date: February. 10, 2005
http://www.google.com/patents?id=4lWVAAAAEBAJ&printsec=abstract&zoom=4&hl=ro#v
=onepage&q&f=false
And now the surprise: the Gerovital!
http://www.realgerovital.com/gh3-gerovital-procaine-articles2.htm
By certain methylation processes together with "base exchange" reactions, the ethanol
amine enters the synthesis cycle of choline and then acetylcholine as a next step. After
injecting 99mTc-DEAE to rats, radioactive marker was found in the ethanol amine and
acetylcholine extracted from brain and blood homogenates.
I wonder (!?) if increasing the dose of Gerovital (after it have taken the measures in the
above material, to avoid allergies and other problems that may occur) would not get good
results? The sign of question is to protect myself...
Read and in Romanian language (this is a material published in a Romanian newspaper:
LIBERTATEA (on line). The solution is verified and practically (but illegally) used on people,
for many years, in Romania. It means: broke any kind of connections between tumor and the
vegetative nervous system. Because the cancer is a "soft" generated by vegetative nervous
system at the solid tumor level (the individual malign cells are destroyed by immunologic
system). So, the immunologic system can't "see” the tumor because she is "smart".

See US patent "US 2005/0031648 A1
Feb. 10, 2005"
Mail: pascu_gabriel2002@yahoo.com, Phone: +40733846532
PANORAMA
Știrea următoare:
Un chirurg si un fizician din București pregătesc leacul cancerului
Metoda de combatere a maladiei mortale ar putea fi izolarea nervoasa a tumorii. In
lumea medicala circula anecdota cum ca fostul președinte american Bill Clinton ar
fi ordonat ca până la sfârșitul anului 2000 sa se găsească leacul împotriva
cancerului. Nu a fost sa fie. Pana acum, despre cercetările in domeniu, cercetări
care beneficiază de fonduri de miliarde de dolari, se spune ca "s-ar putea" sa
aibă succes. Este vorba despre găsirea unui vaccin anticancer care, deocamdată,
funcționează doar la găini. Aceasta in SUA. În Romania, un fizician si un medic
chirurg au pus si ei gând rău cancerului, dar cu fonduri personale si după o idee
mai originala. Dacă teoria lor funcționează, până la sfârșitul primăverii viitoare
cancerul nu va mai fi sinonim cu "moartea sigura".
Organismul viu este format din miliarde de celule diferențiate pe funcții foarte
bine stabilite. In momentul in care unul din organe nu mai funcționează,
organismul, în întregul său, se apropie de colaps. Una din bolile care scot din
funcțiune organe vitale este cancerul, boala pe care unii medici o definesc ca
fiind "personificarea diavolului".
Încă nu se știe care este cauza care îl declanșează, dar este cert faptul ca
tumora propriu-zisa pornește de la o mutație genetica a unei celule. Aceasta se
divide si da naștere unor celule canceroase, adică celule de tip embrionar,
nediferențiat, care nu mai respecta rolul pe care ar trebui să-l joace în
organism, celule care încep sa se înmulțească foarte repede si să distrugă
țesuturile din vecinătate, în condițiile unui consum de energie imens care
slăbește foarte repede organismul. Aceasta este tumora canceroasa, maligna, un
țesut care se comporta ca un invadator si un distrugător pentru celelalte celule
din jur. In scurt timp, organul atacat este scos din funcțiune. Ciudat este faptul
ca sistemul imunitar nu reacționează în nici un fel împotriva țesutului canceros
care periclitează viața organismului. Pur si simplu nu îl recunoaște ca fiind un
inamic. Cauzele au rămas necunoscute pana acum. Mai mult, in mod absolut
paradoxal, organismul ajuta dezvoltarea tumorii, ca într-un fel de sinucidere.
Spre deosebire de tumora maligna, cea benigna nu creste așa de repede si, mai
ales, nu ataca țesuturile învecinate. Nici la tumora benigna nu sunt însa
cunoscute cauzele apariției.
Momentan, lupta contra cancerului se duce cu citostatice, adică substanțe care
încetinesc diviziunea celulara, oprind astfel dezvoltarea țesutului canceros,
iradierea cu cobalt a zonelor canceroase si extirparea chirurgicala a tumorilor.
In cazul operației, procentul de supraviețuire după 5 ani, conform unui sondaj
oficial, este de 10-16%, în funcție de poziționarea tumorii în organism. O
observație interesanta a medicilor este ca cele mai multe cazuri reușite sunt pe
pacienți care sunt hotărați sa lupte cu boala. Cei resemnați nu au aproape nici o
șansa.
În cazul citostaticelor, unul dintre cele mai mari inconveniente este căderea
unghiilor si a parului. Specialiștii spun ca aceste metode clasice, chiar in cazul
unor reușite, nu elimina din organism factorul care determina apariția cancerului.
Tumora poate sa-si reia dezvoltarea maligna. In afara de aceste metode "clasice",
la aceasta ora cercetătorii americani spera sa găsească o substanța care sa
stimuleze organismul sa producă anticorpi împotriva celulei canceroase.
In urma cu șase ani, fizicianului Gabriel Pascu i-a venit o idee năstrușnica. El a
plecat de la un lucru banal, respectiv de la faptul ca sistemul imunitar se
declanșează imediat ce in corp a apărut un "invadator". Or, informația ca acel
invadator a apărut în organism nu o poate da decât sistemul nervos. Respectiv,
faptul ca o entitate e "prieten" sau "dușman" al organismului este o decizie a
sistemului nervos central. Plecând de aici, Pascu a dezvoltat o teorie pe care a

numit-o "Teoria gravitaționala a vieții", prin care demonstrează ca țesutul
canceros nu este atacat de către sistemul imunitar deoarece celulele nervoase il
considera "prieten". Mai clar, în măsura în care celule canceroase sunt născute de
organism, acestea nu pot fi reperate drept inamici. Pascu propune izolarea
nervoasa a țesutului cancerigen pe cale chirurgicala, respectiv tăierea
legăturilor cu rețeaua nervoasa vegetativa, lucru care ar duce la "deșteptarea"
sistemului imunitar si atacarea tumorii. Vindecarea s-ar produce astfel in mod
natural. Trebuie menționat ca metoda izolării nervoase a unui organ prin metode
chirurgicale a mai fost folosita in 1923 de către medicul roman Toma Ionescu, dar
nu pentru cazuri de cancer.

"Nu am spus nimănui nimic pana nu m-am documentat temeinic. Voiam să fiu sigur că
ceea ce susțin eu nu este o nebunie. Apoi a trebuit să caut un medic care să fi
avut tangență cu această boală si, totodată, să aibă bunăvoința de a lucra alături
de mine", spune Gabriel Pascu.
În cursul acestui an, Gabriel Pascu a contactat un medic primar ORL-ist, chirurgul
Dorel Manu de la Spitalul Titan, care operează tumori canceroase maligne de peste
20 de ani. Medicul a rămas surprins de teoria fizicianului si a pornit la
verificarea ipotezei de lucru. "Informațiile sunt absolut noi si de o simplitate
uluitoare. După opinia mea, șansele de succes sunt de 60 la sută, până acum.
Oricum, convingerea mea rămâne ca leacul împotriva cancerului trebuie să fie ceva
extrem de simplu. In cazul de față, peste câteva săptămâni vom porni experimentele
pe cobai, apoi vom vedea. Până atunci vom forma o echipa de specialiști pe mai
multe domenii pentru a ști exact in ce moment trebuie izolată tumora din punct de
vedere nervos, astfel ca fenomenul de creștere a țesutului malign sa fie stopat,
iar organismul să înceapă lupta cu tumora.
Eu cred ca aceasta intervenție va trebui să se producă in faza incipienta. Oricum
acest lucru se va releva in experiențe pe animale. Dacă totul merge bine, si cred
ca va merge, până la mijlocul anului viitor metoda va putea fi aplicata la om. Mă
gândesc si la posibilitatea evitării intervenției chirurgicale. Există
posibilitatea injectării locale a unei substanțe care stopează circulația
informației nervoase in acea zonă. O asemenea intervenție simplifică si mai mult
lucrurile", spune chirurgul Dorel Manu.
La aceasta oră, o copie a manuscrisului "Teoria gravitaționala a vieții" se află

la profesorul universitar fizician Valer Toșa, care urmează să o ducă in Japonia
si să o propună spre studiere si grupului multidisciplinar de lucru de pe lângă
Institutul National de Tehnologie al Japoniei. Specialiștii japonezi au dat
publicității informația conform căreia organismul uman învinge, până la vârsta de
7 ani, aproximativ 20 de cancere in faza incipientă. De ce nu își poate organismul
păstra aceasta capacitate de luptă, nu se știe deocamdată.
"În ceea ce privește metoda lor, trebuie să spun că sunt cam pesimist".
"Nu știu ce sa spun. Este adevărat că sistemul imunitar este influențat intr-o
oarecare măsura de către sistemul nervos, dar izolarea nervoasă a tumorii
cancerigene este o operație mult prea delicată. Pe plan mondial se încearcă acum
vaccinurile, care se pare că vor avea viitor, respectiv injectarea unor substanțe
care au drept țintă celulele canceroase. În ceea ce privește metoda izolării
nervoase, trebuie să spun ca sunt cam pesimist", ne-a declarat Ion Bălănescu,
directorul Institutului Oncologic "Alexandru Trestioreanu" din București.
Știrea următoare
COMENTARII
Momentan nu sunt comentarii la acest articol.
Adauga comentariul tau

United Nation Educational Scientific and Cultural Organisation

Comisia Nationala a Romaniei pentru
UNESCO

Centrul de Studii pentru Stiinte de Granita
Pentru a transmite direct mesajul dumneavoastra tuturor
membrilor apasati clik pe butonul alaturat

Membrii Centrului de Studii pentru Stiinte de Granita
Nr.
Crt.

Numele si
prenumele

1
2
3
4

Bojor Ovidiu
Banc Andrei
Constandache G.
Cristea Aurelia
Dimoftache
5
Constantin
6 Dop Radu
7 Dorobantu Andrei
8 Dumitru Constantin
9 Farcas Dan
10 Filip Florin
11 Iamandescu I.B.
12 Ilinca Mircea
13 Luchian Octavian
14 Marginean Mircea
Mencinicopschi
15
Gh.
16 Oprescu Ion
17 Paun Ludovic
18 Popescu Cristian
19 Popescu Gabriel
20 Restian Adrian
Trausan-Matu
Stefan
22 Zagrean Leon
23 Dragan Simona
21

Telefon fix

Telefon
mobil
0724479193

0217262562
0217716744
0213192896

Adresa de e-mail

Observatii

ovidiu.bojor@home.ro
andrei.banc@gmail.com
g_constandache@yahoo.fr

0213188338
0722333999
0726694024
0788494648dumitruconstantindulcan@yahoo.com
0214138383
dandfarcas@yahoo.com
0212128658
0745035942
iamandb@yahoo.com
0232211686 0744514556

ilincamircea@yahoo.com

- secretar
general

0745088688
0723207061
0744575778
0216427368
0216427368 0722204992
0722336332
0212304911

mcpopescu@amaltea.ro
popescugg@yahoo.com

0724480247

arestian@hotmail.com

0724985518

trausan@racai.ro

3120880 0723584722
0256491880 0723250937

ioprescu@rnc.ro

leon.zagrean@gmail.com
sdragan@cardiologie.ro

- presedinte
fondator

24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41

Fabritius Klaus
Herman Sonia
Jompan Afilon
Lazarescu Mircea
Schneider Francisc
Savulescu April
Geo
Sirbu Carmen
Predescu Ovidiu
Tanase Dorina
Guja Cornelia
Ciulean Alexandru
Sorea Daniela
Lucia Simona
Dinescu
Laslo Claudia
Elena
Mironov Alexandru
Robberb Peter
Oostveen
Stoian Marin
Pascu Gabriel

0722345474
6874519

liasonia@gmail.com
0722318354
0743403631
0766230134

3172891 0722610505
3186906
3191448
6671973
6741757
0268315956

Ageos@b.astral.ro

0788353460
0720324231
0745121528
0720874396

sircar13@yahoo.com
opredescu@cliknet.ro
dorinatt@yahoo.com
cguja@yahoo.com

0727357695

danasorea@yahoo.fr

3484530 0722971696
0723345672

lucia_simona@yahoo.com
salasdesus@yahoo.com

0723394221
0744569507

drosa@arexim.ro

0727507179
0720680484

marin.stoian@gmail.com
gabipascu2000@yahoo.com

Pentru a transmite direct mesajul dumneavoastra tuturor
membrilor apasati clik pe butonul alaturat

Prima pagina

Sign up to vote on this title
UsefulNot useful