179 views

Uploaded by Michael B. Vincent

- factors lesson part revised
- Scott Presentation
- NmbrThry2
- Craig Stuntz’s Weblog An Enumeration of Prime Numbers with Anon
- Sumssquares.ps
- 2_Answer
- A FEW OLD PROBLEMS.pdf
- DS Tough Questions Part 3
- Project Euler Problems
- Factorial Table
- 4 – Math Homework 10.21 – 10.25.2013 Original & Modified
- Chapter 5 II Set Enhance
- Class VI.pdf
- Breaking the Code
- gmat book
- V. I. Arnold Dynamics, Statistics and Projective Geometry of Galois Fields
- New Microsoft Office Word Document
- Assign3 Sol
- AlgebraII
- Classification

You are on page 1of 4

Keith Devlin

Euler’s zeta function is deﬁned for any real number s greater than 1 by the inﬁnite

sum:

1 1 1 1

ζ(s) = 1 + s + s + s + s + . . .

2 3 4 5

(Provided s is a real number bigger than 1, this inﬁnite sum has a ﬁnite answer.) After

Euler deﬁned this function, he showed that it has a deep and profound connection

with the pattern of the primes. Namely, he proved that:

1 1 1 1

ζ(s) = × × ×

1 − (1/2 ) 1 − (1/3 ) 1 − (1/5 ) 1 − (1/7s )

s s s

1

where the product on the right is taken over all terms where p is a prime.

1 − (1/ps )

How did Euler discover this amazing connection? The story begins with the

familiar theorem that the harmonic series

1 1 1 1

1+ + + + + ...

2 3 4 5

has an inﬁnite sum. Knowing this fact, Euler wondered about the “prime harmonic

series”

1 1 1 1 1

PH = 1 + + + + + + ...

2 3 5 7 11

you get by adding the reciprocals of all the primes. Does this sum have a ﬁnite or

an inﬁnite answer? A natural way to try to answer this question — if you are Euler,

that is — is to split up the harmonic series into two parts, collecting all the primes

terms together and all the composite terms together, i.e.,

1 1 1 1 1 1

1+ + + + ... + + + + ...

2 3 5 4 6 8

and then try to show that the second part has a ﬁnite answer. This would mean that

the ﬁrst part is what causes the harmonic series to have an inﬁnite answer. But the

ﬁrst part is just P H, so this would show that P H must have an inﬁnite answer. It’s a

good idea but there is a snag. Because the harmonic series has an inﬁnite answer, you

cannot split it into two separate sums like this. (As every child learns in elementary

school, you can split up a ﬁnite sum any way you like, and the answer will always

remain the same. But the same is only true for inﬁnite sums if all their answers are

ﬁnite.) So Euler adopted a roundabout way instead.

Suppose, said Euler, that we take some positive real number s slightly greater

than 1, and instead of looking at the harmonic series

1 1 1 1

1+ + + + + ...

2 3 4 5

1

but applying them this time to an inﬁnite number of inﬁnite sums... 1 1 1 1+ + + + . like this: 1 1 1 1 1 1 ζ(s) = 1 + s + s + s + . the ﬁrst part being all the prime terms. the second all the nonprime terms. . 2 3 5 here increases without bound. and so you can split it up into two inﬁnite parts.we look at the related sum 1 1 1 1 ζ(s) = 1 + s + s + s + s + . taking s = 1... p n kn s 2 . . 2 3 5 4s 6s 8s The idea then is to show that... (0 < x < 1) 1−x For any prime number p and any s > 1. 1 − (1/p ) s p p p This expression on the left is a typical term in Euler’s inﬁnite product. 2 3 5 is inﬁnite. so the above equation provides an inﬁnite sum expression for each term in the inﬁnite product. . What Euler did next was multiply together all of these inﬁnite sums to give an alternative expression for his inﬁnite product. and hence that. the ﬁrst sum 1 1 1 1 + s + s + s + . . Using the ordinary algebraic rules for multiplying (a ﬁnite number of ﬁnite) sums. we can set x = 1/ps to give: 1 1 1 1 = 1 + s + 2s + 3s + . . if you were to take s closer and closer to 1. of course. Provided s is bigger than 1. . .. its terms are all the expressions of the form 1 p1 k1 s . + + + + . this sum does have a ﬁnite answer. 2 3 4 5 you get by raising each term in the harmonic series to the power s. A key step in this argument was to establish the celebrated equation 1 1 1 1 ζ(s) = × × × 1 − (1/2 ) 1 − (1/3 ) 1 − (1/5 ) 1 − (1/7s ) s s s 1 where the product on the right is taken over all terms where p is a prime. 1 − (1/ps ) Euler’s idea was to start with the familiar formula for the sum of a geometric series: 1 = 1 + x + x2 + x3 + .. you see that when you write out the right-hand side as a single inﬁnite sum. .

. (You have to be a bit careful how you do this. kn are positive integers. a + 3k.) Now.. 7. In particular. 5. But by the fundamental theorem of algebra. and each such combination occurs exactly once. . . The details are not particularly diﬃcult. .. 1 2 3 4 where χ(n) is a special kind of function — which Dirichlet called a “character” — that splits the primes up in the required way. .. the French mathematician Lejeune Dirichlet generalized Euler’s method to prove that in any arithmetic progression a. In 1837. and used the generalized versions to prove a great many results about prime numbers. . depending on the remainder they left when divided by k. . . 1 − (χ(2)/2 ) 1 − (χ(3)/3 ) s s 1 − (χ(5)/5 ) 1 − (χ(7)/7s ) s 3 . Euler’s inﬁnite product formula for ζ(s) marked the beginning of analytic number theory. .. a + k. they can be expressed as an inﬁnite product over the prime numbers (sometimes known as an Euler product). . The Riemann zeta function is the special case that arises when you take χ(n) = 1 for all n. pn kn s . . His modiﬁed zeta function had the form χ(1) χ(2) χ(3) χ(4) L(s. χ) where s is a real number greater than 1 and χ is a character is known as a Dirichlet L-series. A key result about L-functions is that. χ) = s + s + s + s + . namely: 1 1 1 1 L(x.) Any function of the form L(s. it must be the case that χ(mn) = χ(m)χ(n) for any m. . as with the zeta function. n. there are inﬁnitely many primes.where p1 . to avoid getting into diﬃculties with inﬁnities. 3. a + 2k. every positive integer can be expressed in the form p1 k1 s . .e. . thereby demonstrating that the L-series provide an extremely powerful tool for the study of the primes. . of all odd numbers. ζ(s).. where a and k have no common factor. . even though it did provide a completely new proof of Euclid’s result that there are inﬁnitely many primes. χ) = × × × × . Mathematicians subsequent to Dirichlet generalized the notion by allowing the variable s and the numbers χ(n) to be complex numbers. and that χ(n) = 0 if n and k have a common factor. .) The principal modiﬁcation to Euler’s method that Dirichlet made was to modify the zeta function so that the primes were separated into separate categories. (The other conditions are that χ(n) depends only on the remainder you get when you divide n by k. from the point of view of the subsequent development of mathematics it was not so much the fact that the prime harmonic series has an inﬁnite sum that is important. 2 3 4 5 i. . . pn are diﬀerent primes and k1 . Hence the right- hand side is just a rearrangement of the sum 1 1 1 1 1+ s + s + s + s + . Rather. (Euclid’s theorem can be regarded as the special case of this for the arithmetic progression 1.

where the product is taken over all expressions of the form 1 1 − (χ(p)/ps ) where p is a prime number. 4 .(provided the real part of s is not negative).

- factors lesson part revisedUploaded byapi-223640107
- Scott PresentationUploaded byfeng_ning_ding4153
- NmbrThry2Uploaded byAamir
- Craig Stuntz’s Weblog An Enumeration of Prime Numbers with AnonUploaded byvokenp
- Sumssquares.psUploaded byJosé Maurício Freire
- 2_AnswerUploaded bydubstepo
- A FEW OLD PROBLEMS.pdfUploaded bymoka0687
- DS Tough Questions Part 3Uploaded byzafrin
- Project Euler ProblemsUploaded bylakshmi
- Factorial TableUploaded bysatrel00
- 4 – Math Homework 10.21 – 10.25.2013 Original & ModifiedUploaded bystocks301
- Chapter 5 II Set EnhanceUploaded byjuriah binti ibrahim
- Class VI.pdfUploaded byRabi Kumar Patra
- Breaking the CodeUploaded byAziz London
- gmat bookUploaded byTài Trương Thế
- V. I. Arnold Dynamics, Statistics and Projective Geometry of Galois FieldsUploaded bySean Patrick Walsh
- New Microsoft Office Word DocumentUploaded bySameer Salam
- Assign3 SolUploaded byVinod Gour
- AlgebraIIUploaded byCarlos Alberto Ajila Loayza
- ClassificationUploaded byBala Murugan
- 1001 Solved Problems in Engineering Mathematics by Tiong & RojasUploaded byGumball Watterson
- std x mathsUploaded bymknatoo1963
- Confirmation of RiemannUploaded byJay Prakash Savage
- Study Centre 19 September 2017Uploaded byJoshua Black

- Thaddeus H.black DerivationsUploaded byMichael B. Vincent
- (eBook PDF) Mathematics - Chaos TheoryUploaded byMichael B. Vincent
- BRD DDR Rosenholzbericht2007 PDF Birthler BehoerdeUploaded byMichael B. Vincent
- Der Kapitalismus Treibt Auf Eine Ausweglose SituationUploaded bykarl-heinz-hans-2594
- Diophantische Approximation X0Mj6544Uploaded byMichael B. Vincent
- Abbreviations German Democratic RepublicUploaded byMichael B. Vincent
- CUCINA - Guida viniUploaded byMichael B. Vincent
- Dissertation EnigmaUploaded byMichael B. Vincent
- Hacker.journal.n..7Uploaded byMichael B. Vincent
- Hacker.journal.n..6Uploaded byMichael B. Vincent
- Dci LeadersUploaded byMichael B. Vincent
- Bnd Kosovo Feb 2005 vs VertraulichUploaded byMichael B. Vincent
- BRD DDR Rosenholzbericht2007 PDF Birthler BehoerdeUploaded byMichael B. Vincent
- aktenverzeichnis_kd_pasewalkUploaded byMichael B. Vincent
- Hacker.journal.n..10Uploaded byMichael B. Vincent
- Hacker.journal.n..2Uploaded byMichael B. Vincent

- Diophantine Analysis Thesis by Jorn SteudingUploaded byhumejias
- Zeta FunctionUploaded byDevendra Tiwari
- Maier, Schleich - Prime NumbersUploaded byItz Deejay Sengupta
- #Rieman Hyp_Prime Numbers & PhysicsUploaded byIlirjan Cane
- Explicit Evaluations of Euler SumsUploaded byhumejias
- The Semiclassical Zeta Function for Geodesic Flows on Negatively Curved ManifoldsUploaded bylastname name
- 1305.2897v4Uploaded byShanna Aurora Pimentel
- StirlingUploaded byverdos
- Zero Point EnergyUploaded byFernando Martinez Leyva
- TamagawaNumber1Uploaded byzeta aniki
- Riemann Hypothesis - WikipediaUploaded byrapo73
- Zeta FunctionUploaded byTodor A Bilarev
- gammaFunction.pdfUploaded byTeferi
- Zeta Function RegularisationUploaded byzcapg17
- Pitkanen - Local Zeta Functions & Rieman Zeta in TGD (2007)Uploaded byuniversallibrary
- Justification of the zeta regularization algorithm to obtain finite values for divergent integrals.Uploaded byJose Javier Garcia
- Threshold MathematicsUploaded bysfhelio
- Value Distribution of L-FunctionsUploaded byJ R Mejia Sánchez
- The search for a Hamiltonian whose Energy Spectrum coincides with the Riemann Zeta ZeroesUploaded byKlee Irwin
- Riemann hypothesis.pdfUploaded byFlyLove
- PDFs Week6Lecture5Uploaded byKofi Appiah-Danquah
- Pier Francesco Roggero, Michele Nardelli, Francesco Di Noto - "CONNECTION BERNOULLI NUMBERS Bn AND RIEMANN ς(s) ZETA FUNCTION WITH ITS ZEROS"Uploaded byMichele Nardelli
- Famous Mathematicians2Uploaded byKristine Oliver Rodriguez
- A summary of Zeta regularization method for the regularlization of divergent integralsUploaded byeljose1234
- Analytic Continuation of OperatorsUploaded bybejitunksu
- On some mathematical equations concerning the functions zeta(s) and zeta(s,w) and some Ramanujan-type series for 1/pigreco . Mathematical connections with some equations concerning the p-adic open string for the scalar tachyon field and the zeta strings (2010)Uploaded byMichele Nardelli
- A Collection of Problems Published on Mathematical MagazinesUploaded byΘωμαςΣτεφανιδης
- Prime Number RacesUploaded bybertsenior7
- Visual Complex Funcs Phase Plots CopyUploaded byBrian Precious
- RiemannUploaded bySubhakanta Ranasingh