31 views

Uploaded by airpavset

MIX DESIGN

save

- Effect of Superplasticizer and NaOH Molarity On
- UFC 3-250-04 Standard Practice for Concrete Pavements, With Change 2 (01!16!2004)
- Concrete-Classification,Types and Testing
- Mix Design of Concete Roads
- standard concrete
- Proportioning Concrete Mixtures
- mix design- m40 - modified 28 days ccs
- DoE-pdf
- DURABILITY OF CONCRETE STRUCTURES
- Mix Design
- Mix Design of High Strength Concrete
- High Strength Concrete Mix Design
- ACI-211
- Conc M40 Mix Design
- High Performance Concrete
- CE 308 Lec 9 Mix Design of Concrete
- ACI 363R-92 Report on High Strength Concrete (55 p)
- Copy of New Microsoft Office Excel Worksheet DUMMY
- In Order to Attain the Research Objectives
- High strength concrete
- special concrete
- Concrete Mix Design
- ASTM C-42
- Standard Specifications for Subdivision Section 3
- Concrete Mix Design
- Steps of Concrete Mix Design BS
- Specification a10 Ips Flooring
- Mix Design of Concrete
- Concret Mix Design (M10 to M100)
- High Performance Concrete
- METHOD OF DETERMINATION OF MODULUS OF SUBGRADE REACTION K IN FIELD IS.9214.1979.pdf
- Materials Database Ver4
- govlawircy201115 (1).pdf
- APWA Superpave Summary
- byelaws.pdf
- Yonphula-pre-bid-minutes.pdf
- Timesaving-2WaySlabs-IA.pdf
- Checklist for Carrying Out Excavation and Piling Works in - Attachment A7-2
- vaastu ebook.pdf
- TORs International Airport Expansion Legal Advisor (1).pdf
- Maufacturing of Dry Lean Concrete
- ATT02 P-32 COMFAA.doc
- MPC98-94A
- Comparative Evaluation For Mix Design of Marshall and Superpave Methods 10085.pdf
- Paver 7.0 About
- engineeringcivil.com-Continuously_Reinforced_Concrete_Pavement.pdf
- 24681851-Superpave-Mix-Design.pdf
- mtl_che_nle_ppt_newton.ppt
- benefitanalysisofsubgradeandsurfaceimprovementsinflexiblepavements-2-130529031958-phpapp02.pdf
- Comparative Study for the Design of Single Span Bridge Using AASHTO LRFD and Indian Standard Method
- California Bearing Ratio
- RFP - DPR_ADB_IV-PKg._1_Bhopal___Narmadapuram_Divisions.pdf
- CBR Pavement Evaluation .pdf
- Cbr
- The Effect of FillerAsphalt Ratio on Voids in 78314
- B.ARCH-2009.pdf
- PROECT REPORT LIBRE
- 7_design_procedures.pdf
- FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT DESIGN.pdf
- 24681851 Superpave Mix Design

You are on page 1of 9

html

Mix Design For Concrete Roads As Per IRC:15-2011

By

Kaushal Kishore, Materials Engineer, Roorkee

ABSTRACT:

The stresses induced in concrete pavements are mainly f lexural. Theref ore f lexural strength is more of ten

specif ied than compressive strength in the design of concrete mixes f or pavement construction. A simple

method of concrete mix design based on f lexural strength f or normal weight concrete mixes is described in

the paper.

INTRODUCTION:

Usual criterion f or the strength of concrete in the building industry is the compressive strength, which is

considered as a measure of quality concrete. However, in pavement constructions, such as highway and

airport runway, the f lexural strength of concrete is considered more important, as the stresses induced in

concrete pavements are mainly f lexural. Theref ore, f lexural strength is more of ten specif ied than

compressive strength in the design of concrete mixes f or pavement construction. It is not perf ectly reliable

to predict f lexural strength f rom compressive strength. Further, various codes of the world specif ied that

the paving concrete mixes should pref erably be designed in the laboratory and controlled in the f ield on the

basis of its f lexural strength. Theref ore, there is a need to design concrete mixes based on f lexural

strength.

The type of aggregate can have a predominant ef f ect, crushed rock aggregate resulting in concrete with

higher f lexural strength than uncrushed (gravel) aggregates f or comparable mixes, assuming that sound

materials are used. The strength of cement inf luences the compressive and f lexural strength of concrete

i.e. with the same water-cement ratio, higher strength cement will produce concrete of higher compressive

and f lexural strength.

MIX DESIGN DETAILS

IRC: 15-2011 specif ied that f or concrete roads OPC should be used. This code also allowed PPC as per IS:

1489 (Part-1) with f lyash content not more than 20 percent by weight of PPC. Accordingly OPC + f ly ash

may be used in concrete roads. Flyash shall be not more than 20 percent by weight of cementitious

material. However, IS: 456-2000 specif ied that f ly ash conf orming to grade-1 of IS” 3812 may be used as

part replacement of OPC provided unif orm blended with cement is essential. The construction sites where

batching plants are used this may be practicable. In ordinary sites where mixer or hand mixing are done

unif orm blending of f ly ash with cement is not practicable. At such construction sites, PPC may be used.

PPC should be used with caution where rapid construction methods like slip f orm is being used. Joints

cutting also need early strength.

1 Characteristic

Flexural

Strength at

28 days

:

4.5 N/mm

2

2 Cement : Three mixes are to be designed

MIX-A

With PPC (Flyash 18 percent based) conf orming to IS:1489-part-I-1991. 7 days

strength 37.5 N/mm

2

. Specif ic Gravity : 3.00

MIX-B

With OPC-43- Grade conf orming to IS: 8112-1989. 7 days strength 40.5 n/mm

2

.

Specif ic Gravity : 3.15

MIX-C

With OPC of Mix-B and Fly ash conf orming to IS:3812 (Part-I)-2003 Specif ic

Gravity : 2.20

Note: Requirements of all the three mixes are the same. Fine Aggregate, Coarse

Aggregate and Retarder Super plasticizer are the same f or all the three mixes.

3 Fly ash

replacement

: 20% Fly ash is required to be replaced with the total cementitious materials.

4 Maximum

nominal size

of

aggregates

: 31.5 mm Crushed aggregate

5 Fine

aggregate

and coarse

aggregate

grading

: Given in Table 1

6 Minimum

cement

content f or

4.5 N/mm2

characteristic

f lexural

strength:

:

(a) OPC shall not be less than 360 kg/m

3

.

(b) PPC shall not be less than 425 kg/m

3

. Fly ash in it 20% maximum by weight of

total cementitious materials

(c) OPC + Fly ash mix OPC shall not be less than 340 kg/m

3

. Fly ash 20%

maximum by weight of cementations material

7 Maximum f ree

W/C Ratio

: (a) For OPC 0.45

(b) For PPC 0.50

8 Workability : 40 mm slump at pour the concrete will be transported f rom central batching plant

through transit mixer, at a distance of 15 Km during June, July months. The

average temperature last year during these months was 30

0

C.

9 Exposure

condition

: Moderate

10 Method of

placing

: Fully mechanised construction

11 Degree of

supervision

: Good

12 Maximum of

cement

content

:

(a) OPC 425 kg/m

3

(b) PPC 425 kg/m

3

13 Chemical

admixture

: Retarder Super plasticizer conf orming to IS:9103-1999. With the given

requirements and materials, the manuf acturer of Retarder Super plasticizer

recommends dosages of 1% bw of OPC, which will reduce 15% of water without

loss of workability. For f ly ash included cement dosages will be required to be

adjusted by experience/ trials.2% maximum by weight of cementitious material

14 Values of Z x

(f or National

Highway)

: 1.96 x 0.40

TEST DATA FOR MATERIALS AND OTHER DETAILS

1. The grading of f ine aggregate, 1 & 2 aggregates are as given in Table. 1.

2. Properties of aggregates

Tests Fine aggregate Aggregate 1 Aggregate 2

Specif ic Gravity 2.65 2.65 2.65

Water Absorption % 0.8 0.5 0.5

3. Target average f lexural strength f or all A, B and C mixes

S = S+ Zq

=4.5 + 1.96 x 0.40

= 5.3 N/mm

2

at 28 days age

4. For Mix A, B and C f ree W/C ratio with crushed aggregate and required average f lexural target strength of

5.3 N/mm

2

at 28 days f rom Fig. 1 Curve D f ound to be 0.42. This is lower than specif ied maximum W/C ratio

value of 0.45 f or OPC and 0.50 f or PPC.

Note:

In absence of cement strength, but cement conf orming to IS Codes, assume f rom Fig. 1

Curve C and D f or OPC 43 Grade

Take curves C and D f or PPC, as PPC is being manuf actured in minimum of 43 Grade of strength.

5. Other data’s: The Mixes are to be designed on the basis of saturated and surf ace dry aggregates. At the

time of concreting, moisture content of site aggregates are to be determine. If it carries surf ace moisture

this is to be deducted f rom the mixing water and if it is dry add in mixing water the quantity of water

required f or absorption. The weight of aggregates are also adjusted accordingly.

DESIGN OF MIX-A WITH PPC

a) Free W/C ratio f or the target f lexural strength of 5.3 N/mm

2

as worked out is 0.42 f or f irst trial.

b) Free water f or 40 mm slump f rom Table 2 f or 31.5 mm maximum size of aggregate.

2/3×170 + 1/3×200= 180 kg/m

3

From trials it is f ound that Retarder Super plasticizer at a dosages of 1.3% bw of PPC may reduce 15%

water without loss of workability

Then water = 180 – (180 x 0.15) = 153 kg/m

3

c) PPC = 153/0.42 = 364 kg/m

3

(Required minimum PPC is 425 kg/m

3

)

d) Formula f or calculation of f resh concrete weight in kg/m

3

U

m

= 10 x G

a

(100 – A) + C

m

(1 – G

a

/G

c

) – W

m

(Ga – 1)

Where,

U

m

=Weight of f resh concrete kg/m3

G

a

=Weighted average specif ic gravity of combined f ine and coarse aggregate bulk, SSD

G

c

=Specif ic gravity of cement. Determine actual value, in absence assume 3.15 f or OPC and 3.00 f or PPC

(Fly ash based)

A=Air content, percent. Assume f or trial entrapped air 1.5%

For 31.5 mm maximum size of aggregate

There is always entrapped air in concrete. Theref ore ignoring entrapped air value as NIL will lead the

calculation of higher value of density. Take exact value of air as obtained in the test

W

m

=Mixing water required in kg/m

3

C

m

=Cement required, kg/m

3

Note:- The exact density may be obtained by f illing and f ully compacting constant volume suitable metal

container f rom the trial batches of calculated design mixes. The mix be altered with the actual obtained

density of the mix.

U

m

=10 x G

a

(100 – A) + C

m

(1 – G

a

/G

c

) – W

m

(G

a

– 1)

=10 x 2.65 (100 – 1.5) + 425(1- 2.65/3.00) – 153 (2.65 -1)

=2409 kg/m

3

e) Aggregates = 2409 – 425 – 153 = 1831 kg/m

3

f ) Fine aggregate = 1831 x 0.45 = 824 kg/m

3

Aggregate 1 = 1831 x 0.29 = 531 kg/m

3

Aggregate 2 = 1831 x 0.26 = 476 kg/m

3

g) Thus f or 4.5 N/mm2 f lexural strength quantity of materials per cu.m. of concrete on the basis of

saturated and surf ace dry aggregates:

Water = 153 kg/m

3

PPC = 425 kg/m

3

Fine Aggregate (sand) = 824 kg/m

3

Aggregate (1) = 531 kg/m

3

Aggregate (2) = 476 kg/m

3

Retarder Super Plasticizer 1.3% bw of PPC = 5.525 kg/m

3

MIX- B WITH OPC

a) Water = 180 – (180 x 0.15) = 153 kg/m

3

b) OPC = 153/0.42 = 364 kg/m

3

c) Density: 10 x 2.65 (100 – 1.5) + 364 (1 – 2.65/3.15) – 153 (2.65 – 1)= 2416 kg/m

3

d) Total Aggregates = 2416 – 364 – 153 = 1899 kg/m

3

Aggregate 1 = 1899 x 0.29 = 551 kg/m

3

Aggregate 2 = 1899 x 0.26 = 494 kg/m

3

Fine Aggregate = 1899 x 0.45 = 854 kg/m

3

e) Thus f or 4.5 N/mm

2

f lexural strength quantity of materials per cu.m of concrete on the basis of SSD

aggregates are given below:

Water = 153 kg/m

3

OPC = 364 kg/m

3

Fine Aggregate (sand) = 854 kg/m

3

Aggregate (1) = 551 kg/m

3

Aggregate (2) = 494 kg/m

3

Retarder Super Plasticizer 1% bw OPC = 3.640 kg/m3

MIX-C WITH OPC + FLY ASH

With a total cementitious material of 430 kg/m

3

,

OPC = 430 x 0.80 = 344 kg/m

3

Fly ash = 430 x 0.20 = 86 kg/m

3

Mix on the basis of SSD Aggregates,

(1) Water as worked out earlier = 153 kg/m

3

(2) OPC = 344 kg/m

3

(3) Fly ash = 86 kg/m3

Density = 10 x 2.65 (100 – 1.5) + 430 (1 – 2.65/3.00) – 153 (2.65 – 1) = 2410 kg/m

3

Total Aggregates = 2410 – 153 – 344 – 86 = 1827 kg/m

3

(4) Fine aggregate 0.45 x 1827 = 822 kg/m

3

(5) Aggregate (1) 0.29 x 1827 = 530 kg/m

3

(6) Aggregate (2) 0.26 x 1827 = 475 kg/m

3

(7) Retarder super plasticizer 1.5% bw of cementitious material = 6.450 kg/m

3

Note:

(1) Cementitious material worked out as per IRC : 15-2011, which specif ied: In case f ly ash (as per IS: 3912

Part 1) is blended at site, the quantity of f ly ash shall be restricted to 20 percent by weight of cementitious

material and the quantity of OPC in such a blend shall not be less than 340 kg/m

3

.

(2) Af ter the f irst trial mix, its actual density is to be determined, as specif ied elase where in this paper. The

mix proportions shall then be worked out accordingly including the water content, the dosages of Retarder

SP f or required workability keeping the f ree w/c ratio with in the permissible limits and adjusting it according

to the required f lexural strength.

(3) The mix proportions given in this paper are f or f irst trial and to be adjusted as per actual site materials,

conditions and requirements.

For 4.5 N/mm

2

flexural strength quantity of material per cu.m of concrete on the basis of saturated

and surface dry aggregates of Mix ‘A’, ‘B’ and ‘c’ are given below:

Materials MIX. ‘A’ with PPC Mix. ‘B’ with OPC Mix. ‘C’ with OPC+Flyash

Water kg/m

3

153 153 153

PPC kg/m

3

425 – –

OPC kg/m

3

– 364 344

Flyash kg/m

3

– – 86

Fine Agg. kg/m

3

824 854 822

Agg. (1) kg/m

3

531 551 530

Agg. (2) kg/m

3

476 494 475

Retarder Super- plasticizer kg/m

3

5.525 3.640 6.450

W/ Cementitious ratio 0.36 0.42 0.356

Note:-

1. For exact W/C ratio the water in admixture should also be taken into account.

2. PPC reduces 5% water demand. If this is f ound by trial then take reduce water f or calculation.

3. If the trial mixes does not gives the required properties of the mix, it is then required to be altered

accordingly. However, when the experiences grows with the particular set of materials and site conditions

very f ew trials will be required, and a expert of such site very rarely will be required a 2nd trial.

CONCLUSION

1. For 4.5 N/mm

2

f lexural strength concrete having same material and requirement, but without water

reducer, the OPC required will be 180/0.42 = 429 kg/m

3

2. With the use of superplasticizer the saving in OPC is 65 kg/m

3

and water 27 lit/m

3

.

3. In the f inancial year 2009-2010 India has produces 200 million tonnes of cement. In India one kg of

cement produce emitted 0.93 kg of CO

2

. Thus the production of 200 million tonnes of cement had emitted

200 x 0.93 = 186 million tonnes of CO

2

to the atmosphere.

4. If 50 million tonnes cement in making concrete uses Water Reducers 7500000 tonnes of cement can be

saved. 3750000 KL of potable water will be saved and the saving of Rs. 3300 crores per year to the

construction Industry. 6975000 tonnes of CO

2

will be prevented to be emitted to the atmosphere. The

benef its in the uses of water reducers not limited to this. When water reduces shrinkage and porosity of

concrete are reduces which provides the durability to concrete structures.

5. India is f acing serious air, water, soil, f ood and noise pollution problems. Every ef f orts theref ore are

necessary to prevent pollution on top priority basis.

6. As the stress induced in concrete pavements are mainly f lexural, it is desirable that their design is based

on the f lexural strength of concrete. The quality of concrete is normally assessed by measuring its

compressive strength. For pavings, however, it is the f lexural strength rather than the compression

strength of concrete which determine the degree of cracking and thus the perf ormance of road, and it is

imperative to control the quality on the basis of f lexural strength.

7. As per IRC: 15-2011, in case of small size projects, where f acilities f or testing beams with three print

loading are not available, in such cases, the mix design may be carried out by using compressive strength

values and there af ter f lexural strength will be determined as per correlation between f lexural strength with

compressive strength given the f ollowing equation.

Where f cr is the f lexural strength in MPa or N/mm

2

and f ck is the characteristic compressive strength in

MPa or N/mm

2

as per IS: 456-2000.

REFERENCES:

1 IS : 383-

1970

Specif ications f or coarse and f ine aggregates f rom natural sources f or concrete

(second revision) BIS, New Delhi

2 IS: 456-

2000

Code of practice f or plain and reinf orced concrete (f ourth revision), BIS, New

Delhi

3 IS: 9103-

1999

Specif ication f or admixtures f or concrete (f irst revision) BIS, New Delhi

4 IS: 8112-

1989

Specif ications f or 43 Grade ordinary portland cement (f irst revision) BIS, New

Delhi

5 IS: 2386

(Part-III)

1963

method of test f or aggregate f or concrete. Specif ic gravity, density, voids,

absorption and bulking, BIS, New Delhi

6 IS: 3812

(Part-I)

2003

Specif ication f or pulverized f uel ash: Part-I f or use as pozzolana in cement,

cement mortar and concrete (second revision) BIS, New Delhi

7 IS: 1489-

Part-I 1991

Specif ications f or portland pozzolana cement (Part-I) Flyash based. (Third

revision), BIS, New Delhi

8 IRC: 15-2011 – Standard specif ications and code of practice f or construction of concrete road

(Fourth revision)

9 Kishore Kaushal, “Concrete Mix Design Based on Flexural strength f or Air-Entrained Concrete”,

Proceeding of 13

th

Conf erence on our World in Concrete and Structures, 25-26, August, 1988,

Singapore.

10 Kishore Kaushal, “Method of Concrete Mix Design Based on Flexural Strength”, Proceeding of the

International Conf erence on Road and Road Transport Problems ICORT, 12-15 December, 1988,

New Delhi, pp. 296-305.

11 Kishore Kaushal, “Mix Design Based on Flexural Strength of Air-Entrained Concrete”. The Indian

Concrete Journal, February, 1989, pp. 93-97.

12 Kishore Kaushal, “Concrete Mix Design Containing Chemical Admixtures”, Journal of the National

Building Organization, April, 1990, pp. 1-12.

13 Kishore Kaushal, “Concrete Mix Design f or Road Bridges”, INDIAN HIGHWAYS, Vol. 19, No. 11,

November, 1991, pp. 31-37

14 Kishore Kaushal, “ Mix Design f or Pumped Concrete”, Journal of Central Board of Irrigation and

Power, Vol. 49, No.2, April, 1992, pp. 81-92

15 Kishore Kaushal, “Concrete Mix Design with Fly Ash”, Indian Construction, January, 1995, pp. 16-

17

16 Kishore Kaushal, “High-Strength Concrete”, Bulletin of Indian Concrete Institute No. 51, April-June,

1995, pp. 29-31

17 Kishore Kaushal, “Concrete Mix Design Simplif ied”, Indian Concrete Institute Bulletin No. 56, July-

September, 1996, pp.25-30.

18 Kishore Kaushal, “Concrete Mix Design with Fly Ash & Superplasticizer”, ICI Bulletin No. 59, April-

June 1997, pp. 29-30

19 Kishore Kaushal. “Mix Design f or Pumped Concrete”, CE & CR October, 2006, pp. 44-50.

Table. 1: Grading of Aggregates

IS Sieve

Designation

Percentage of passing by mass

Fine

aggregate

f rom river

45%

Crushed

aggregate

Combined

grading of

mix

IRC: 15-2011 recommended grading of combined

aggregates f or pavement quality concrete (PQC)

(1)

29%

(2)

26%

31.50 mm 100 100 100 100 100

26.50 mm 100 100 98 99 85 – 95

19.0 mm 100 100 25 81 68 – 88

9.50 mm 100 46 0 58 45 – 65

4.75 mm 94 5 44 30 – 55

600 micron 42 0 19 8 – 30

150 micron 10 5 5 – 15

75 micron 2 1 0 – 5

Table. 2: Approximate free-water content (kg/m3) required to give various levels of workability for

non-air-entrained (with normal entrapped air) concrete.

Maximum size of aggregate (mm) Type of aggregate Slump (mm) 25 + 10 40 + 1031.5

Uncrushed

Crushed

160

190

170

200

Note:- When coarse and f ine aggregate of dif f erent types are used, the f ree water content is estimated by

the expression.

2/3W

f

+1/3W

c

Where,

W

fsub>= Free water content appropriate to type of fine Aggregate

And W

c

= Free water content appropriate to type of coarse aggregate.

We at engineeringcivil.com are thankful to Er. Kaushal Kishore for submitting the revised mix design as per

IRC:15-2011. This will be of great help to all civil engineering students and faculty who are seeking information

on mix design based on revised IRC.

- Effect of Superplasticizer and NaOH Molarity OnUploaded bysantu49225
- UFC 3-250-04 Standard Practice for Concrete Pavements, With Change 2 (01!16!2004)Uploaded byBob Vines
- Concrete-Classification,Types and TestingUploaded byRishabh Lala
- Mix Design of Concete RoadsUploaded byRanga Chaitanya
- standard concreteUploaded byVimalan Kannan
- Proportioning Concrete MixturesUploaded byhola_kb
- mix design- m40 - modified 28 days ccsUploaded byKuldeep Chakerwarti
- DoE-pdfUploaded byShawgi Ahmed
- DURABILITY OF CONCRETE STRUCTURESUploaded bySujay Raghavendra N
- Mix DesignUploaded byawotina
- Mix Design of High Strength ConcreteUploaded byvempadareddy
- High Strength Concrete Mix DesignUploaded byNasir Shah
- ACI-211Uploaded byv_gouriotou
- Conc M40 Mix DesignUploaded byNisar Shaikh
- High Performance ConcreteUploaded byskyfirelight
- CE 308 Lec 9 Mix Design of ConcreteUploaded bywasimkhaliq
- ACI 363R-92 Report on High Strength Concrete (55 p)Uploaded byJorge Gutierrez
- Copy of New Microsoft Office Excel Worksheet DUMMYUploaded byanon_789699787
- In Order to Attain the Research ObjectivesUploaded byAmani Smadi
- High strength concreteUploaded byHari Prasad
- special concreteUploaded bykavetisrinivas
- Concrete Mix DesignUploaded byamitbd
- ASTM C-42Uploaded bythescubatater
- Standard Specifications for Subdivision Section 3Uploaded byyrdgcgf5664
- Concrete Mix DesignUploaded byAKVISHWA
- Steps of Concrete Mix Design BSUploaded byAlhilali Ziyad
- Specification a10 Ips FlooringUploaded byharishram123456
- Mix Design of ConcreteUploaded byBijay Krishna Das
- Concret Mix Design (M10 to M100)Uploaded byRajesh Kollipara
- High Performance ConcreteUploaded bysayuuishot

- METHOD OF DETERMINATION OF MODULUS OF SUBGRADE REACTION K IN FIELD IS.9214.1979.pdfUploaded byairpavset
- Materials Database Ver4Uploaded byairpavset
- govlawircy201115 (1).pdfUploaded byairpavset
- APWA Superpave SummaryUploaded byairpavset
- byelaws.pdfUploaded byairpavset
- Yonphula-pre-bid-minutes.pdfUploaded byairpavset
- Timesaving-2WaySlabs-IA.pdfUploaded byairpavset
- Checklist for Carrying Out Excavation and Piling Works in - Attachment A7-2Uploaded byairpavset
- vaastu ebook.pdfUploaded byairpavset
- TORs International Airport Expansion Legal Advisor (1).pdfUploaded byairpavset
- Maufacturing of Dry Lean ConcreteUploaded byairpavset
- ATT02 P-32 COMFAA.docUploaded byairpavset
- MPC98-94AUploaded byairpavset
- Comparative Evaluation For Mix Design of Marshall and Superpave Methods 10085.pdfUploaded byairpavset
- Paver 7.0 AboutUploaded byairpavset
- engineeringcivil.com-Continuously_Reinforced_Concrete_Pavement.pdfUploaded byairpavset
- 24681851-Superpave-Mix-Design.pdfUploaded byairpavset
- mtl_che_nle_ppt_newton.pptUploaded byairpavset
- benefitanalysisofsubgradeandsurfaceimprovementsinflexiblepavements-2-130529031958-phpapp02.pdfUploaded byairpavset
- Comparative Study for the Design of Single Span Bridge Using AASHTO LRFD and Indian Standard MethodUploaded byairpavset
- California Bearing RatioUploaded byairpavset
- RFP - DPR_ADB_IV-PKg._1_Bhopal___Narmadapuram_Divisions.pdfUploaded byairpavset
- CBR Pavement Evaluation .pdfUploaded byairpavset
- CbrUploaded byairpavset
- The Effect of FillerAsphalt Ratio on Voids in 78314Uploaded byairpavset
- B.ARCH-2009.pdfUploaded byairpavset
- PROECT REPORT LIBREUploaded byairpavset
- 7_design_procedures.pdfUploaded byairpavset
- FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT DESIGN.pdfUploaded byairpavset
- 24681851 Superpave Mix DesignUploaded byairpavset