You are on page 1of 3

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND
Southern Division
*
BRETT KIMBERLIN,
*
Plaintiff
*
v. CASE NO.: !H"#$"$%&'
*
NATIONAL BLOERS CLUB, (t al.,
*
D(f(n)ant*
*
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
DEFENDANT +ALKER,S RE-ISED MOTION TO DISMISS THE SECOND AMENDED
COMPLAINT AND CONDITIONAL RE.UEST FOR A HEARIN
NOW COMES Defendant Aaron J. Walker, Esq. and moves to dismiss the Plaintiff’s Seond
Amended Com!laint "ith !re#$die. %he Plaintiff has asserted laims that the Defendants have violated
federal la" $nder this o$rt’s ori&inal #$risdition and laims that the Defendants have violated state la"
$nder this o$rt’s s$!!lemental #$risdition $nder '( ).S.C. *+,-./a0. %he federal laims sho$ld 1e
dismissed !$rs$ant to 2ederal 3$le of Civil Proed$re +'/10/-0 for fail$re to state a laim.
Mean"hile, the state laims sho$ld 1e dismissed either !$rs$ant to 2ed. 3. Civ. P. +'/10/+0 for
lak of s$1#et4matter #$risdition or !$rs$ant to 3$le +'/10/-0. S!eifiall5, there is no at$al diversit5
of iti6enshi!, the Plaintiff does not !ro!erl5 alle&e the #$risditional amo$nt, and he has not stated a
laim for "hih relief an 1e &ranted.
Alternativel5, if this o$rt sho$ld find that +0 all federal laims sho$ld 1e dismissed, 1$t that '0
there is diversit5 of iti6enshi!, ,0 that the !laintiff has alle&ed the #$risditional minim$m and 70 that he
has stated a laim $!on "hih relief an 1e &ranted relief an 1e &ranted for his state la" laims, Mr.
Walker res!etf$ll5 req$ests a hearin& to test the #$risditional amo$nt $nder Zander v. United States,
'8+' W9 77.,:' /D.Md. '8+'0.
2inall5, Mr. Walker req$ests that s$h dismissal 1e &ranted "ith !re#$die and, $!on f$rther
motions, that this o$rt &rant santions $!on the Plaintiff inl$din& o$rt osts and other a!!ro!riate
osts, and an in#$ntion delarin& that the Plaintiff is a ve;atio$s liti&ant and req$irin& that he o1tain
!relearane 1efore filin& an5 liti&ation in the f$t$re.
%he reasons for this Motion are f$ll5 set o$t in the aom!an5in& Memorand$m of Points and
A$thorities in S$!!ort.
W<E3E2O3E Defendant Walker req$ests=
• %hat all federal laims are dismiss $nder 2ed. 3. Civ. P. +'/10/-0,
• %hat all state laims are dismissed $nder 2ed. 3. Civ. P. +'/10/+0 or /-0,
• %hat if all federal laims are dismissed, 1$t an5 state laim s$rvives this motion, a hearin& 1e
&ranted to test the #$risditional amo$nt,
• %hat s$h dismissals 1e &ranted "ith !re#$die,
• %hat this o$rt sho$ld onsider motions for santions and, $!on s$h motions, &rant monetar5
santions, and in#$ntive relief a!!ro!riate for a ve;atio$s liti&ant, and
• All other relief as a!!ro!riate.
'
%$esda5, J$l5 +>, '8+7 3es!etf$ll5 s$1mitted,

Aaron J. Walker, Esq.
?a @arA 7((('
BredatedC
BredatedC
BredatedC
AaronJW.'D&mail.om
,