You are on page 1of 21

Name of Employee: Name of Rater:

Position: Position:
Review Period: Date of Review:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Weight ACTUAL
per KRA RESULTS
Journal
LESSON LOG
LESSON PLAN/
1. TEACHING- Signed Observation
Form with agreement LEARNING PROCESS
TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING
TIMELINE OBJECTIVES KRAs MFOs
Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
(Quality, Efficiency,
Timeliness)
TEACHER I-III
RATING
USED EFFECTIVE TEACHING
LEARNING STRATEGIES











PREPARED DAILY LESSON
PLAN/LOG












INITIATED DISCIPLINE
AMONG PUPILS, CLASSROOM/
ORDERLINESS & CLEANLINESS

JUNE,20
14
to
MARCH,
2015
40%
5- Has provided individual activities
for a 130% and above of the classes
handled for the rating period,
Cooperative learning strategies was
130% and above effective when
used, Teaching methods and
strategies elicited 130% and above
interaction from a class, ICT
integration is 130% and above
4- Only 115-129% is evident
3-Lacking 2 indicators
2-Lacking 3 indicators
1-Indicators not evident

5-All daily lesson plans had the
following objective, subject matter,
procedures, evaluation and
assignment/Each part had a full
description of what to do with an
example/Objective was specific,
measurable, attainable, result-
oriented and time-bound/130% and
above based on the budget of work
/Attained 130% and above of the
desired learning competencies
4- Lacking 1 indicator
3-Lacking 2 indicators
2-Lacking 3 indicators
1-Indicators not evident

5-Pupils were 130% and above
guided in the observation of
classroom rules and guidelines as
Name of Employee: Name of Rater:
Position: Position:
Review Period: Date of Review:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Weight ACTUAL
per KRA RESULTS
Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form
CERTIFICATES 2. LEARNING
OUTCOMES
Form 1
RATING (Quality, Efficiency,
Timeliness)
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING
TEACHER I-III
TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION











MONITORED DAILY
ATTENDANCE








PARTICIPATED CURRICULAR
& CO-CURRICULAR ACTIVITIES

JUNE,20
14
to
MARCH,
2015




















30%
Safety, orderliness and cleanliness
of floors, toilets and proper waste
disposal were 130% and above
maintained
4- Only 115-129% is evident
3-Lacking 1 indicator
2-Lacking 2indicators
1-Indicators not evident

5- Attendance checking was 130%
and above systematically carried
out
4-Attendance checking was 115-
129%
3-Attendance checking was 100-
114%
2-Attendance checking was 51-99%
1-Attendance checking was 50%
and below

5-Initiated at least 2 curricular/ co-
curricularschool activities with
documented results

4-initiated and participated in co-
curricular/school activities with
documented results

3-participated in most of co-
curricular/ school activities with
documented results

2-Participation only without
documented results

Name of Employee: Name of Rater:
Position: Position:
Review Period: Date of Review:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Weight ACTUAL
per KRA RESULTS
PERFORMANCE
INDICATOR
PERFORMANCE
INDICATOR
MPS RECORD
RATING
(Quality, Efficiency,
Timeliness)
ALL SCHOOL FORMS
Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
TEACHER I-III
UPDATED SCHOOL RECORDS
FORM 137,138, 1,2, CLASS
RECORDS,TEST
QUESTIONS,ETC.












ATTAINED 75% MPS AND
ABOVE IN EVERY GRADING
PERIOD



ZERO (0) DROP-OUT





ONE HUNDRED (100)
PERCENT PROMOTION RATE
JUNE,
2014
to
MARCH,
2015
5- Class record reflected the bases
of 130% and above of pupils ratings
in all classes/subject areas
handled/Students portfolio
contained 130% and above of his
accomplishment/Table of
Specifications is 130% and above
prepared for tests that require
it/Test questions were130% and
above logically sequenced/130%
and above used and updated
SF1,SF2, F138,F137-e
4- Lacking 1 indicator
3-Lacking 2 indicators
2-Lacking 3 indicators
1-Lacking 4 indicators

5-130% and above MPS
4-115-129% MPS
3-100-114% MPS
2-51-99% MPS
1-50% and below MPS

5-130% and above Zero Drop-Out
4-115-129% Zero Drop-Out
3-100-114% Zero Drop-Out
2-51-99% Zero Drop-Out
1-50% and below Zero Drop-Out

5-130% and above Promotion
4-115-129% Promotion
3-100-114% Promotion
2-51-99% Promotion
Name of Employee: Name of Rater:
Position: Position:
Review Period: Date of Review:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Weight ACTUAL
per KRA RESULTS
Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
(Quality, Efficiency,
Timeliness)
TEACHER I-III
PHIL-IRI FORMS
SREYEA FORMS
PUPILS HEALTH
RECORD
MINUTES OF MEETING 3. COMMUNITY
INVOLVEMENT
TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
RATING
ATTAINED 75%
INSTRUCTIONAL READING
LEVEL



ACHIEVED 95% READERS IN
SREYEA




ACHIEVED 95% NORMAL
LEVEL OF NUTRITIONAL
HEALTH STATUS



CONDUCTED PERIODIC PTA
MEETINGS/CONFERENCES





JUNE,
2014
to
MARCH,
2015





















20%

5-130% and above Instructional
level
4-115-129% Instructional level
3-100-114% Instructional level
2-51-99% Instructional level
1-50% and below Instructional level

5-130% and above Readers
4-115-129% Readers
3-100-114% Readers
2-51-99% Readers
1-50% and below Readers

5-130% and above NORMAL
STATUS
4-115-129% NORMAL STATUS
3-100-114% NORMAL STATUS
2-51-99% NORMAL STATUS
1-50% and below NORMAL STATUS

5-130% and above accomplishment
with set agreements met
4-115-129% of planned meetings
conducted producing only set
agreements and partial
accomplishment of these
3-100-114% of planned meetings
conducted producing set of
agreements
2-51-99% of planned meetings
conducted with minimal results
1-50% and below of planned
meetings conducted with no results
Name of Employee: Name of Rater:
Position: Position:
Review Period: Date of Review:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Weight ACTUAL
per KRA RESULTS
Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
RATING (Quality, Efficiency,
Timeliness)
TEACHER I-III
RECEIPTS,PICTURES,
ETC
BE ATTENDANCE FORM
MEMBERSHIP FORM 4. PROFESSIONAL
GROWTH AND
DEVELOPMENT
UNDERTAKEN/INITIATED
PROJECTS/EVENTS/
ACTIVITIES WITH EXTERNAL
FUNDING/SPONSORSHIP








ACHIEVED 100%
PARTICIPATION DURING
BRIGADA ESKWELA



PARTICIPATED IN RELATED
ORGANIZATIONS/
ASSOCIATION


















10%
5-130% and above project
accomplishment with full
documentation report on
completion
4-115-129% project
accomplishment with partial
completion
3-100-114% project initiative only
with no completion report
2-51-99% project initiative only with
no completion report
1-No project/event/activity initiated

5-130% and above PARTICIPATION
4-115-129% PARTICIPATION
3-100-114% PARTICIPATION
2-51-99% PARTICIPATION
1-50% and below PARTICIPATION

5- Active member of at least 2
associations.organizations

4- member of at least 2
associations.organizations

3- Active member of at least 1
associations.organizations

2-member of at least 1
associations.organizations

1-Non-participation to any related
associations.organizations
Name of Employee: Name of Rater:
Position: Position:
Review Period: Date of Review:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Weight ACTUAL
per KRA RESULTS
T.O.R.
* To get the score, the rating is multiplied by the weight assigned OVERALL
RATING FOR
ACCOMPLI-
SHMENTS
Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
RATING (Quality, Efficiency,
Timeliness)
TEACHER I-III
CERTIFICATES
VARIES
Rater Ratee
ATTENDED TWO (2)
CURRICULAR TRAININGS




DEMONSTRATED BASIC
COMPUTER LITERACY








ATTAINED POST GRADUATE
STUDIES














5-130% and above ATTENDED
4-115-129% ATTENDED
3-100-114% ATTENDED
2-51-99% ATTENDED
1-50% and below ATTENDED


5-130% and above SKILLS
Demonstrated
4-115-129% ICT SKILLS
Demonstrated
3-100-114% ICT SKILLS
Demonstrated
2-51-99% ICT SKILLS Demonstrated
1-50% and below ICT SKILLS
Demonstrated


5- Doctorate Degree
4- Doctoral Units
3-MAED
2-CAR
1-with Masteral Units
TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
SCORE
SCORE
TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
SCORE
TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
SCORE
TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
SCORE
TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
SCORE
Name of Employee: Name of Rater:
Position: Position:
Review Period: Date of Review:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Weight ACTUAL
per KRA RESULTS (Quality, Efficiency,
Timeliness)
CERTIFICATES 1. PROFESSIONAL
Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
MASTER TEACHER I-IV
GROWTH AND
DEVELOPMENT
RATING
demonstration
teaching
Documented
CONDUCTED
SEMINARS/WORKSHOPS/
TRAININGS FOR TEACHERS IN
SPECIFIC LEARNING AREAS



















SERVED AS
DEMONSTRATION TEACHER
FOR SCHOOL/DIVISION LEVEL
TRAININGS

JUNE,
2014
to
MARCH,
2015
30%
5- Conducted 5
seminars/workshops/trainings for
teachers in specific learning areas
(supported by evidence/assessment
reports)
4- Conducted 4
seminars/workshops/trainings for
teachers in specific learning areas
(supported by evidence/assessment
reports)
3-Conducted 3
seminars/workshops/trainings for
teachers in specific learning areas
(supported by evidence/assessment
reports)
2-Conducted 2
seminars/workshop/
trainings for teachers in specific
learning areas (supported by
evidence/assessment reports)

1-Conducted 1 seminar/workshop/
training for teachers in specific
learning areas (supported by
evidence/assessment reports)

5-4 lesson demonstrations served
4-3 lesson demonstrations served
3-2 lesson demonstrations served
2-1 lesson demonstration served
1-No lesson demonstration served


Name of Employee: Name of Rater:
Position: Position:
Review Period: Date of Review:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Weight ACTUAL
per KRA RESULTS
RATING
(Quality, Efficiency,
Timeliness)
2. Instructional
Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
MASTER TEACHER I-IV
Competence
ACHIEVED ABOVE 85% OF
THE STUDENTS
PERFORMANCE AT THE END
OF SCHOOL YEAR






COMPLETED THE REQUIRED
COMPETENCIES FOR THE
STUDENTS IN EVERY
QUARTER










INCREASED NAT
PERFORMANCE OF SCHOOL
JUNE,
2014
to
MARCH,
2015
40%
5- 130% and above student
peformance (in MPS )
4- 115-129% student peformance
(in MPS )
3-100-114% student peformance (in
MPS )
2-51-99% student peformance (in
MPS
1-50% and below student
performance (in MPS )

5- 130% and above of the required
competencies in every quarter
completed
4- 115-129% of the required
competencies in every quarter
completed
3-100-114% of the required
competencies in every quarter
completed
2-51-99% of the required
competencies in every quarter
competed
1-50% and below of the required
competencies in every quarter completed

5- 10% increase
4- 6% increase
3-5% increase
2-4 % increase
100% mastery of
learning
competencies
85% annual
student
performance
NAT RESULT
INCREASED
Name of Employee: Name of Rater:
Position: Position:
Review Period: Date of Review:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Weight ACTUAL
per KRA RESULTS (Quality, Efficiency,
Timeliness)
Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
MASTER TEACHER I-IV
RATING
OBSERVED 100% OF THE
TEACHERS IN THE SCHOOL
WITH POST CONFERENCE IN
EVERY QUARTER
















CONDUCTED
MENTORING/COACHING
PROGRAM TO TEACHERS IN
THE SCHOOL ON QUARTERLY
BASIS
JUNE,
2014
to
MARCH,
2015
30%
5- 130% and above of teachers
observed with post conference with
teacher observation reports held in
every quarter
4- 115-129% of teachers observed
with teacher observation and post
conference reports, held in every
quarter
3-100-114% of teachers observed
with teacher observation and post
conference reports, held in every
quarter
2-51-99% teachers observed with
teacher observation and post
conference reports, held in every
quarter
1-50% and below of teachers
observed with teacher observation
and post conference reports, held
in every quarter


5- 5 and above teacher mentoring
/coaching sessions were conducted
in every quarter ( with report)
4- 4 teacher mentoring /coaching
sessions conducted in every quarter
(with report)
3- 3 teacher mentoring /coaching
sessions conducted in every quarter
(with report)
2-1-2 teacher mentoring /coaching
sessions conducted in every quarter
(with report)
Quarterly
observation forms
for teachers
accomplished
Instructional
Supervision
3 documented
mentoring/
coaching activities
per quarter

Name of Employee: Name of Rater:
Position: Position:
Review Period: Date of Review:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Weight ACTUAL
per KRA RESULTS
* To get the score, the rating is multiplied by the weight assigned OVERALL
RATING FOR
ACCOMPLI-
SHMENTS
RATING (Quality, Efficiency,
Timeliness)
Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
MASTER TEACHER I-IV
Rater Ratee
MANAGED PERFORMANCE
OF TEACHERS FOLLOWING
THE RPMS CYCLE (PLANNING
AND COMMITMENTS,
COACHING AND MONITORING,
REVIEW AND EVALUATION AND
DEVELOPMENT PLANNING)













JUNE,
2014
to
MARCH,
2015
30%
5- Evaluated 130% and above
teacher performance following
RPMS framework cycle
4- Evaluated115-129% teacher
performance following RPMS
framework cycle
3-Evaluated100-114% teacher
performance following RPMS
framework cycle
2-Evaluated 51-99%of teacher
performance following RPMS
framework cycle
1-Evaluated 50% and below of
teacher performance following
RPMS framework cycle
Accomplished
teachers
evaluation report
SCORE
TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
SCORE
TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
SCORE
TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
SCORE
TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
JUNE,201
4
to
MARCH,
2015
40%
5- ALL DAILY lesson plans had the
following objective, subject matter,
procedures, evaluation and assignment,
Each part had a full description of what
to do with an example, Objective was
specific, measurable, attainable, result-
oriented and time-bound, 130% and
above developed high order thinking
skills