doodler Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 12:30 PM To: Doberman <>, Van Icelandic <drvanice@gmail.

com> Hi guys Let me start by saying I'm not trying to get more traffic for the site. My chat with that criminologist I spoke to today needs IMMEDIATE and much more exposure I can generate safely. It is critical that whites are warned about the dangerous position they find themselves in with their black staff. PLEASE would you do a post regarding the dangers of blacks working for them passing their personal info to gangs. I cannot go into more detail for fear of outing this person. The truth is that one of these fucks who got a life sentence for the murder of the mother and her daughter refuses to talk because the main criminal is still out there. If he talks he is dead. The main guy is the leader of the gang who is responsible for the deaths and home invasions of several white homes. The maid gave all the info, the fucks sat outside eating KFC waiting for them to come home. They strangled the girl because she wet herself when they wanted to rape her. NOT FOR PUBLICATION!!!! The mother was stabbed 13 times, stuff inserted into her, and then her throat was slit... Not for publication either please. Lots of Zasucks readers read Iluvsa and I'm hoping that they will take action. It really is very important that eople are warned. My 20 minute conversation with this person is so scary that I have difficulty expressing it sufficiently. You cannot believe what these kaffers get up to. d

Van Icelandic To: doodler <> Cc: Doberman <> Hi Doodler I will do an article. VI

Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 3:02 PM

Doberman Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 5:14 PM To: Van Icelandic <>, Doodler <> Hi VI and Doods Understood. I'll leave it in VI's very capable hands. Doods, a side note, you guys should consider re-linking to ILSA and we'll do the same. We are on the same side after all. Let bygones be bygones for the greater good. Regards Dobes Van Icelandic <> To: doodler <> Hi Doodler I did an article here Not the hard hitting SAS variety, but hopefully something that may make some people take note. I have also published the pictures; not sure how long Scribd will keep my account open. Regards VI Van Icelandic To: Uhuru Guru <> UG You might recall you wrote a story about a fictitious home invasion. This was about a year or so ago. Do you have a copy? I would like to republish if you don't mind. Thanks mate. Regards VI Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 1:14 AM

On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 1:30 PM, doodler <> wrote: doodler <> To: Doberman <>, Van Icelandic Thanks guys. It is now a day later and I am seriously emotional - even more than yesterday. The photos UG added are bad. I was telling UG some more detail about my conversation last night. Dobes, will arrange a link up today. Be well. d

Boerboel Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 3:51 AM Reply-To: Boerboel <> To: Van Icelandic <> Cc: doodler <>, michelle darling <>, Loony iPodtoon <>, David Jooste <>, Uncle Cracker <>, Grumbleguts <> VI Of course VI - I can send it to you and you can upload to Scribd and then link to it from there so as to ensure absolutely no credit to WSAS or links to us. Just like you did yesterday with my images when you hijacked them from SA Sucks without even the slightest compunction to cite any credit. How about I also ghost-write for you so we can formalise this parasitic relationship? I did say "feel free to redistribute" in a comment to you last night. I didn't say misappropriate' and left it to you to do the right thing. The least you could have done is to link to the WSAS article in your ILUVSA post last night or at least cite credit on your Scribd posting which contains my lifted text and imagery. So much for your good faith, "mate". While I applaud your sterling efforts in propagating awareness of the plight of White South Africans, I find it deplorable that you go to such incredible lengths to avoid & ensure no credit or linking will result to WSAS. Lets be clear on this VI - I have no problem with your use of our text and images - its the manner in which you go about it that grates me. Tell me VI, what the fuck is it with you and Doberman and why do you have such an issue with us? Why the male fides? Are we supposed to be in a pissing contest of sorts? Your inimical and rancorous behaviour has mystified me ever since it became evident. UG PS: Tell your boss: request to re-link to your blog unilaterally denied. Generate your own traffic and stop leeching for once.

Van Icelandic Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 7:26 AM To: Uhuru Guru <> Cc: doodler <>, Doberman <> UG Oi vey. Little taken aback with your comments, given the message that I got from Doodler. It is not apparent from his message that he sought a link, quite the contrary in fact. No worries, I will remove the pics and we leave the status quo as is then. VI

Van Icelandic To: Boerboel <> Cc: Doberman <> UG I didn't have time earlier, but just revisited your comments.

Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 8:17 AM

I am surprised that you think there is some kind of grand conspiracy against WSAS. There isn't. I suggest you read Doodler's comments to me, and place it in context. He explicitly stated he did not want traffic, but would like to see us write an article to create general awareness. I wrote the article and published the pics. Neither would have happened if he hadn't asked. I don't speak for ILSA, but they certainly don't leech off WSAS. I think you begrudge ILSA its success. That is still no excuse for your comments to me, which reflect poorly on you. We have always had a cordial relationship, so let's leave it at that. Cheers. VI

Boerboel Reply-To: Boerboel <>

Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 10:04 AM

To: Van Icelandic <> Cc: doodler <>, Doberman <> VI I was completely unaware of this email until now. I was told you requested a reciprocal link and was quite happy to comply. UG

Doberman To: Albeus Ergo Gogito/ Doodler <> Cc: Vanilla Ice <> Doods

Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 3:41 PM

As you can see UG has once again stepped it and misunderstood what transpired. He obviously has a problem with us so best we stay away from each other. You contacted VI and myself to write something about home invasions and stipulated no conditions on how to do it. VI, in my opinion did an excellent job and your story got told. We didn't need to do it. But we did. UG seems to think we "leeched" off WSAS and continue to do so when nothing is further from the truth. I can count the number of times I've visited WSAS this year on one hand. I am neither interested nor have the need to see what others are doing. To each his own. Regretfully, our relationship remains where it was before yesterday and I think it is for the best. Regards


Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 11:14 PM

To: Doberman <> Cc: Vanilla Ice <> Sorry about this. I also have no idea why he reacted so angrilly. He is immensely annoyed about what he views as using the info and no credit given. Personally, I think you actually did err there, VI. He has been incredibly stressed of late, in fact I have never seen him like this before, so obviously that gave rise to his outburst which was a bit rough. There have been several criminal incidents involving him around his home and there are other issues as well all which have lead to a hair trigger temper. I really hope he doesn't lose it on someone. For what it is worth, please accept my apologies. d

Boerboel Reply-To: Boerboel <> To: Van Icelandic <> Cc: Doberman <> LOL VI!

Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 3:18 PM

I never suggested any "grand conspiracy" as you so theatrically put it, just found it amusing that you'll go to such great lengths to avoid citing us. Perhaps I'm naive or just rather slow on the uptake but (in spite of others repeatedly pointing this out to me) I really couldn't bring myself to believe you're actually in some silly pissing contest with us! Its all so bizarre, obtuse and infantile, not to mention incomprehensible - I'm actually cringing as I write this response. If my tone was a bit strident previously (which it clearly was, you appear stung) then I regret any offence caused - silly me, how dare I get huffy if people lift stuff off my blog and repost it elsewhere, right? VI, I really don't "begrudge you your success" - if anything, I remain mindful that imitation is the sincerest form of flattery, no matter how you frame it. ILUVSA is the only spin-off from WSAS which became successful, and I mean that as a compliment - there's been many other attempts. Furthermore, the layout, graphics and quality of articles are outstanding, the penchant for flood posting, or posting hugely inappropriate rock videos notwithstanding. If I didn't have my hands full with my own blog I would definitely have been a daily reader. Tell you what, I'll reinstate the link to ILUVSA right now, and leave it up to you or Mr Daubermann to reciprocate - or not. Its really no skin off my nose mate, no male fides from my side and lets just remember ultimately we're fighting in the same trench in what's ostensibly become our collective 'cause celebre'. Cheers UG

Boerboel Reply-To: Boerboel <> To: Van Icelandic <> So VI

Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 1:16 PM

A stony silence emanating from you and Daubermann...precisely as expected, although the optimist in me held out a faint glimmer of hope. No worries mate. You're not the first bunch of plagiarising two-faced cunts I've had the displeasure of encountering, nor will you be the last. Cost of business, I guess. UG

Sign up to vote on this title
UsefulNot useful