You are on page 1of 52

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Janice Wolk Grenadier
Plaintiff, Civil Action No
VERIFIED COMPLAINT / JURY TRIAL DEMAND
Vs.
USDC of DC Federal Judge James Boasberg
USDC of DC Federal Judge Beryl A. Howell
USDC of DC Federal Judge Reggie Walton
USDC of VA Federal Judge Gerald Lee
Chief Judge Supreme Court Justice Cynthia
Kinser
Chief Judge Donald Haddock
Chief Judge Lisa Kemler
Judge Nolan Dawkins
Judge James Clark
Judge Thomas Fortkort - Attorneys Arbitration
and Mediation, Inc
Judge J. Howe Brown
Judge James J. McGrath - Judicial
Solutions
Judge Richard Bowen Potter
Chief Judge Mary Grace OBrien
Judge Richard J McCue
Lawyers:
Ilona Grenadier Grenadier. Anderson,
Starace, Duffett & Kieser
Heather Jenquine - Grenadier Law et al
Ben DiMuro - DiMuroGinsberg
Hillary J. Collyer - DiMuro Ginsberg /
Lasher et al
Judge John Tran - DiMuro Ginsberg /
Fairfax County Judge
Andrea Molsley - DiMruoGinsberg
Michael Weiser Esq
Ann Schmidt - Reed Smith
Lana Manitta Rich Rosenthal Brincfield
Manitta Dzubin & Kroger LLP
Edward Davis James Michael McCauley
Megan Roberts
George McAndrews
James L. Banks Jr
Angela D. Caesar, - United States Federal Clerk of Court
Patricia L. Harrington - Clerk of Court - Supreme Court of Virginia
Ed Semonian - Elected Clerk of Court / Elected official of the City of Alexandria
Randy Sengel (Ret) - Elected Commonwealth Attorney City of Alexandria

Defendants AS PUBLIC SERVANTS, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN THEIR OFFICIAL
CAPACITY AS AN OFFICER OF THE COURT

VERIFIED COMPLAINT / CONSPIRACY
NOT A DOMESTIC PROBLEM AN AMERICAN PROBLEM
TREASON BY J UDGES, LAWYERS, ELECTED OFFICIALS, GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES,
STATE EMPLOYEES
TO INTERFERE WITH CIVIL RIGHTS Title 18 U.S. Code 241 & 242; Title 42 U.S. Code 1981
& 1983 ILLEGEAL ACTIONS - Attempt to harm Plaintiff and her Girls through DRUGS,
RAPE & SLANDER of Plaintiff to prevent Due Process, Judicial Misconduct, Criminal
Misconduct, Discrimination for Religious, Social, Economic, Hierarch, Gang Type Behavior
Similar to the Klue Klux Klan, , Tampering with Evidence, Mail Fraud, Violating the Law and
the Rules of the Supreme courts, Violation of the J udicial Cannons, Obstruction of J ustice,
Fraud on the Court,
2


COMES NOW Plaintiff Janice Wolk Grenadier (JWG) reserves the right to amend
Verified Complaint and add additional Parties per FRCP Rule 15. Plaintiff Janice Wolk Grenadier
complains against the captioned Defendants as follows: to seek relief for the violation of Federal
and Constitutional rights under Title 42 U.S Code 1981 &1983, Title 18 U.S. Code 241 & 242
and under the Bill of Rights the Four Basic Freedoms are being Violated:
1. Freedom of speech
2. Freedom of worship
3. Freedom from want
4. Freedom from fear

That since 2007 Plaintiff to her face from Judges or representatives of the Judges
have said to Plaintiff You cannot win this we LOVE Ilona, (Chief Judge Donald Haddock) (Ilona
Grenadier Heckman founding partner of Grenadier, Anderson, Starace, Duffet & Keisler PC is who
Judge Haddock LOVES) Me and My family cannot get a fair trial either, you cannot win this you
are no longer one of them (x-wife of Judge Donald Kent best friend to Judge Donald Haddock)
The Dockets shows it would at times take the Judges in the City of Alexandria over 2 months to
find a Judge who would rule in favor of Ilona an attorney lying in court, lying in court documents,
theft of funds through her law firm the Sonia Grenadier Trust and Plaintiff and her girls, bullying
and threatening Plaintiff, involved in forgery, hate of Catholics / Christians, gang like activity mirror
imaging the Klue Klux Klan, Not once has Plaintiff lost because she does not have the Law on her
side, it is because of discrimination religious / social / economic / hierarchy by the Defendants to
protect one of their own.
Further Claims are outlined in this complaint. The United States District Court of the District
of Columbia continued this pattern starting January of 2014 with Judge Walton, Judge
Howell and Judge Boasberg who have empowered this HATE CRIME, are guilty of
Discrimination, Tampering with evidence, Mail Fraud, Obstructions of Justice and other
crimes.
DEMAND TRIAL BY JURY

INTRODUCTION

COMES NOW that on September 12, 2007 Ilona Grenadier Heckman a lawyer
founding partner of Grenadier, Anderson, Starace, Duffett & Keiser PC, widow to Judge Albert
Grenadier and his 1
st
cousin Jerome Heckman, founding partner of Keller Heckman an
3

International law firm LIED IN COURT. The Slippery Slope of the Judicial Misconduct,
Criminal Misconduct, and Discrimination for Religious, Social, Economic and Hierarchy, the
Gang type behavior similar to the Klue Klux Klan the Collusion of the Defendants began to
cover up the Lies, the attempt to harm Plaintiff and her girls American Born Citizens
through drugs and rape, to Slander Plaintiff, to prevent Due Process. The purpose to prevent
one of their own Ilona Grenadier Heckman from being held accountable for:
Perjury, Obstruction of Justice, Aiding and abetting obstruction of Justice, Fraud on the Court, Involvement
of Forgery, Theft of money from the Sonia Grenadier Trust account through her law office for great personal
gain over $10 Million in Real Estate, Theft of Herman Grenadier, joint and several liability, malpractice,
Bribery, Abuse of her Oath of Office, Conspiracy, Collusion, Gang like activity mirror image to the Klue Klux
Klan, Miscarriage of Justice, preventing Due Process, conflict of interest related to the practice of law,
violating code of ethics, has liability to her victims, has violated Plaintiffs Religious, Political, Social, United
state Constitutional, Virginia Constitutional and Civil Rights, Breach of Fiduciary Duties, Violating RULES
OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT, Title 18 US Code 241 Conspiracy against rights, and 242 Deprivation of
rights under color of law, Retaliatory & Retribution actions, Treason, Title VI Civil Rights Act of 1964 Title
VI, 42 U.S.C. 2000d et seq., was enacted as part of the landmark Civil Rights Act of 1964, 18 USC 912.
With her Intention to 18 USC 1341 -Frauds and swindles, Defraud, Breach of Contract, Arbitrary and
Capricious behavior, Committed Fraud on the Court, 18.2-498.3. Misrepresentations prohibited, 18.2-
172 - J udicial Misconduct; Criminal Misconduct; Mail Fraud; Honest Serves Fraud; Extortion;
Harassment; Gang activity; Racketeering; Retaliation; Discrimination; et al. not limited to: decisions made
in bad faith for a corrupt purpose, deliberately and intentionally failing to follow the law; Extrinsic fraud;
Egregious legal errors; Violation of Procedural Rules; Violation of Due Process; uttering, etc., other writings
et al. All of above charges will and can be proven with letters, documents, witnesses who have also
been harmed by the actions of Plaintiff.

This case started out a domestic issue, T0DAY THIS IS AN AMERICAN ISSUE, the
right of access to the courts to a pro se litigant without having their life threatened by the
Collusion, Racketeering of the Judicial Community. That the Judicial Community polices
itself, that Plaintiff has gone through all channels for help, to be turned away. The Judicial
Community has created a smoke and mirrors of Immunity that they have tried to force on the
American people, to believe that they are above the law and cannot be held responsible for their
actions in the court room. This is untrue. That the immunity is lost for actions that are for
personnel gain, that are willful acts that are and were malicious, violent, oppressive, fraudulent,
wanton and grossly reckless. That Discrimination is color blind that there is discrimination for
social, economic and hierarch that exists in the Judicial Community to protect one of their own. The
attached Exhibit 1 will show 6 RECENT cases across this Great Country where Judges and the
Judicial Community are being held accountable for their actions. Judges going to jail for
Obstruction of Justice et al.
4

"Pro se plaintiffs are often unfamiliar with the formalities of pleading requirements.
Recognizing this, the Supreme Court has instructed the district courts to construe pro se
complaints liberally and to apply a more flexible standard in determining the sufficiency of a pro se
complaint than they would in reviewing a pleading submitted by counsel. See e.g., Hughes v.
Rowe, 449 U.S. 5, 9-10, 101 S.Ct. 173, 175-76, 66 L.Ed.2d 163 (1980) (per curiam); Haines v.
Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520-21, 92 S.Ct. 594, 595-96, 30 L.Ed.2d 652 (1972) (per curiam); see also
Elliott v. Bronson, 872 F.2d 20, 21 (2d Cir.1989) (per curiam). In order to justify the dismissal
of a pro se complaint, it must be " 'beyond doubt that the plaintiff can prove no set of facts
in support of his claim which would entitle him to relief.' " Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. at 521,
92 S.Ct. at 594 (quoting Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41, 45-46, 78 S.Ct. 99, 102, 2 L.Ed.2d 80
(1957)).
Table of Contents
(To not confuse Judges to say Plaintiff is rambling)

Introduction Page 2
Table of Contents 4
Jurisdiction and Venue 4
Parties 5
Statement of Facts 27
Claims 38
Conclusion 50

JURISDICTION AND VENUE
Plaintiff incorporates herein by reference all of the allegations contained in Introduction.

This court has original jurisdiction of federal questions pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
1331 1332. The court has supplemental jurisdiction of state claims pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
1367. Venue is proper in this court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1391(b)(2). That Defendant Ilona
Grenadier Heckman is a resident of the District of Columbia since on or around 1986. That
Grenadier, Anderson, Starace, Duffett & Kiesler have licensed attorneys in the District as well as
several other states and do business in the District of Columbia and surrounding states making this
a multi-jurisdictional matter which this court has jurisdiction and authority. That several of the
Attorneys are licensed in the District of Columbia or have offices in the District of Columbia, That 3
5

of the Judges are Federal Judges. This court has jurisdiction under FRCP Rule 1, 2, & 3 and 28
U.S.C. 45.
Further this court has Jurisdiction per: 28 U.S.C. 1343(a)(3) (1993)
provides as follows (a) The district courts shall have original jurisdiction of any civil action authorized
by law to be commenced by any person: . . . (3) To redress the deprivation, under color of any State law,
statute, ordinance, regulation, custom or usage, of any right, privilege or immunity secured by the
Constitution of the United States or by any Act of Congress providing for equal rights of citizens or of all
persons within the jurisdiction of the United States.

28 U.S.C. 1331 (1993) provides that district courts shall have original jurisdiction of all civil actions
arising under the Constitution, laws or treaties of the United States a) The district courts shall have
original jurisdiction of any civil action authorized by law to be commenced by any person: (1) To
recover damages for injury to his person or property, or because of the deprivation of any right or privilege
of a citizen of the United States, by any act done in furtherance of any conspiracy mentioned in section 1985
of Title 42; (2) To recover damages from any person who fails to prevent or to aid in preventing any
wrongs mentioned in section 1985 of Title 42 which he had knowledge were about to occur and power to
prevent; (3) To redress the deprivation, under color of any State law, statute, ordinance, regulation,
custom or usage, of any right, privilege or immunity secured by the Constitution of the United States or by
any Act of Congress providing for equal rights of citizens or of all persons within the jurisdiction of the
United States; (4) To recover damages or to secure equitable or other relief under any Act of Congress
providing for the protection of civil rights, including the right to vote.

Any Act of Congress applicable exclusively to the District of Columbia shall be considered to be a statute of
the District of Columbia.
Parties

Plaintiff incorporates herein by reference all of the allegations contained in Introduction,
Jurisdictions and Venue.

1. Federal Judge James E Boasberg - is guilty of: Judicial Misconduct, Criminal
Misconduct, Discrimination for Religious, Social, Economic, Hierarch, Gang Type Behavior Similar
to the Klue Klux Klan, Slander of Plaintiff to prevent Due Process, Tampering with Evidence, Mail
Fraud, Violating the Law and the Rules of the Supreme courts, Violation of the Judicial Cannons,
Obstruction of Justice, Fraud on the Court, TREASON, Title 18 U.S. Code 241 & 242; Title 42
U.S. Code 1981 & 1983 and other laws

On June 26, 2014 Civil Action No. 14 0162 returning documents stamped into the Record on June
18, 2014 Tampering with evidence, Mail Fraud, Obstruction of Justice, Discrimination et al sending
back:
Additional information towards Motion filed on June 15, 2014 Motion for investigation into
Judge Beryl A. Howell
On June 26, 2014 Civil Action No. !4 0162 returning documents stamped into the Record on June 15, 2014
o Motion for immediate Investigation into Judge A. Howell stealing Documents out of Case File
No.14-0162 with the assistance of the Clerks Angela D. Caesar & Deputy clerk Michael Darby
Obstructing Justice & Tampering with evidence recorded into the record
6

o Motion for immediate Investigation into Judge Beryl A. Howell and her relationship with Keller
Heckman Law firm Jerome (Jerry) Heckman - Ilona Grenadier Heckman Loretta Lax Miller et al
o Motion for immediate Investigation into Judge Beryl A. Howell and Her husband (Michael
Rosenfeld) religious beliefs
o Motion for immediate Investigation into Judge Beryl A. Howells relationship with the Center for
Democracy and Technology that lists Howell as a board alum(per Wikipedia a Technology group
Keller Heckman is very involved in)
o Motion for description as to what is confusing to the Judges on Plaintiffs Amended Complaint
written with the help of an attorney
o Motion for Law used in Order dated on May 19, 2014 & May 30, 2014
That the appearance of Justice is as important as Justice itself That the appearance of the Memorandum
of Law and the Orders is Judges ruling in Favoritism and Cronyism for the Virginia Judicial System and
the United States District Court Eastern District of Virginia to protect their colleges/friends, lawyers,
government employees, Judges, - To keep the Judicial System Corruption from being exposed To discredit
and slander Plaintiff as the United States District Court Eastern District of Virginia has done as well as other
Judges and the documents allowed to be filed by Loretta Miller et al.
o Motion to have all Orders by Judge Beryl A. Howell stricken from the record due to the
appearance of conflict and criminal actions of tampering/stealing Documents stamped and filed
into the Record on Case Civil Action No 14 0162 in this Court

Judge James E Boasberg returning evidence shows the collusion of this court to protect one of their
own Defendant Ilona Grenadier Heckman and the other Judicial members who have acted
Criminally ignoring the law and rules of the Supreme Court, the United States Constitution Due
Process Further establishes the pattern

2. Federal Judge Beryl A. Howell is guilty of: Judicial Misconduct, Criminal Misconduct,
Discrimination for Religious, Social, Economic, Hierarch, Gang Type Behavior Similar to the Klue
Klux Klan, Slander of Plaintiff to prevent Due Process, Tampering with Evidence, Mail Fraud,
Violating the Law and the Rules of the Supreme courts, Violation of the Judicial Cannons,
Obstruction of Justice, Fraud on the Court, TREASON, Title 18 U.S. Code 241 & 242; Title 42
U.S. Code 1981 & 1983 and other laws

The question is what did Plaintiff file on June 26, 2014 that this court without a hearing doesnt want
in Plaintiffs file? What is Federal Judge Beryl A. Howells relationship with Defendants? What is
Judge Beryl A. Howell religious standing? What is Beryl A. Howells relationship with
KellerHeckman et al. The information made available on the internet and the actions of Judge
Howell show Collusion to harm Plaintiff and Plaintiffs girls.

On May 1, 2014 Judge Howell stamped into the record and approved the filing of Loretta Lax Miller
this was and is the only response since January 22, 2014 of defendants response to any of
Plaintiffs filings. The filing was disingenuous, riddled with lies BUT MOST IMPORTANT gave
the Circuit Court Judges of the State of Virginia what they had asked for; Information to make
Plaintiff incompetent so Plaintiff - Pro Se could no longer file documents the expose the Judicial
Criminal Behavior of the Judges. that the collusion of the Defendants to have Plaintiff drugged
and sexual inappropriate pictures had back fired, as well as one of her daughters raped or drugs
planted in her home or on one of her daughters. (this was to take place in or around November /
December 2012 ordered by Judge Clark, Kemler and Dawkins follow thru by Judge Tran /
DiMuroGinsberg et al and Ilona Grenadier Heckman)

7

On May 7, 2014 Plaintiff filed Plaintiffs Response to Home Grown Terrorist: LORETTA
LAX MILLER aka- LEAH LAX aka-MUGGY CAT aka- BILLY SULLIVAN Presidential
Candidate for 2016 Answers to the Amended Verified Complaint and NEW MATTER - Plaintiff
filed with this court the response defending Plaintiffs character and siting the Truth about the
Defendants

That on May 19, 2014 Plaintiffs filings were denied and the discrimination of this court was in full
view of the Public by doing this. That the discrimination is obvious with the disingenuous
documentation in the courts own records why the documents were denied are obvious from what is
hand written on the documents case closed in appeal and what is in the recorded on the docket.
some documents not legible very disingenuous..

May 22, 2014 docket reads Stated on the docket is that SOME DODCUMETNS ARE ILLEGIBLE
this is a lie all documents were 100% Legible. Originals were returned to Plaintiff Obstruction of
Justice, Tampering with Evidence Mail Fraud - Discrimination

May 30, 2014 to further help her friend Ilona Grenadier Heckman Judge Howell filed a Denied
Motion for Law Used filed March 7, 2014. She further in her Order Closed the case while still in
Appeal.

That by not allowing Plaintiffs defense into the record Judge Beryl A. Howell gave Defendants what the
Circuit Court Judges in Alexandria wanted, Slanderous statements that Plaintiff was not of the right mind
set to file documents Pro Se to the court. Where in Truth the Defendants are petrified of the Truth coming
out, that Ilona Grenadier Heckman and her lawyers have been buying off Judges and lying in court, in
court documents. That as a lawyer if Ilona was held accountable would lose her license and possible 5
years in jail as Jim Arthur did.

That the docket shows Beryl A. Howell has had written on the document case is closed and in appeal
Leave to file denied. Yet allowed Loretta Millers filing on May 1, 2014 That the docket reads documents
are illegible so what is the TRUTH it was denied due to documents being illegible which is not true and a
copy and the attachments are attached to this document under Exhibit 2 or as the Judge claimed case is
closed on appeal? This court and the Judges have Obstructed Justice, Tampered with evidence and
showed Discrimination to Plaintiff for being Catholic and Blacked Balled by the Old Boys Network in
Virginia.

3. Federal Judge Reggie Walton is guilty of: Judicial Misconduct, Criminal Misconduct,
Discrimination for Religious, Social, Economic, Hierarch, Gang Type Behavior Similar to the Klue
Klux Klan, Slander of Plaintiff to prevent Due Process, Tampering with Evidence, Mail Fraud,
Violating the Law and the Rules of the Supreme courts, Violation of the Judicial Cannons,
Obstruction of Justice, Fraud on the Court, TREASON, Title 18 U.S. Code 241 & 242; Title 42
U.S. Code 1981 & 1983 and other laws

Memorandum of law the Slander of calling Plaintiffs filings as Rambling without taking serious the
threats on Plaintiff and her children showed discrimination and his collusion with the judicial community
In court Judge Walton said to a Drug dealer You are no better than a slave master yet isnt Judge
Walton and all those involved in the Judicial Criminal Misconduct no better than Slave Masters?
8

4. Federal Judge Gerald Lee is guilty of: Judicial Misconduct, Criminal Misconduct,
Discrimination for Religious, Social, Economic, Hierarch, Gang Type Behavior Similar to the Klue
Klux Klan, Attempt to harm Plaintiff and her Girls through Drugs & Rape, Slander of Plaintiff to
prevent Due Process, Tampering with Evidence, Mail Fraud, Violating the Law and the Rules of
the Supreme courts, Violation of the Judicial Cannons, Obstruction of Justice, Fraud on the Court,
TREASON, Title 18 U.S. Code 241 & 242; Title 42 U.S. Code 1981 & 1983 and other laws

Judge Lee was an active member of the Virginia State Bar. ( Ben DiMuro Past President of VSB) He
was an elected member of the Virginia State Bar Council, Chairman of the General Practice of Law
Section, President of the Northern Virginia Black Attorneys Association, and Chairman of the
Judicial Selection Committee of the Alexandria Bar Association. Judge James C. Cacheris
Practice law in Alexandria, Fairfax County Judge - He began his judicial career when he was elected
to the Fairfax Circuit Court in May, 1992. Prior to ascending to the bench, Judge Lee was a trial
lawyer for fifteen years, representing individuals and businesses in civil and criminal cases. He was
a partner at Cohen, Dunn & Sinclair, P.C., an Alexandria Virginia, law firm Judge Lee is an active
member of the Old Boys Network

October 20, 2011 Plaintiff files in the Eastern District Court of Virginia
Complaint Conspiracy to interfere with the Civil rights 18 USC 241 & 242, USC 1983 Illegal
Actions to Deny access to Grand Jury. Trial by Jury, & More Emergency Motion for Injunctive Relief.
November 9, 2011 Denied in forma pauperis which made suit unaffordable the preventing access
to the courts to Plaintiff ( have been granted it twice in DC ) Plaintiff cannot get a job due to the
slander of Plaintiff by Ilona Grenadier Heckman -
December 20, 2011 Ms. Slaughter Judge Lees secretary lies to Plaintiff
January 13, 2012 Order that was done and mailed on the 18
th
of January 2012. In which Plaintiff
is called Delusional, malicious & looking for frivolous law suits being fantastic and fanciful
nature. SLANDER OF PLAINTIFF - But, Judge Gerald Bruce Lee has met all the other Judges.
Government employees used his staff to lie to Plaintiff and mislead Plaintiff in information about the
Federal court rules. Judge Gerald Bruce Lee has conflict of interest in all parts of Plaintiffs case and
should have recused himself. Because of this Gerald Bruce Lee has lost judicial immunity. Conflict
of interest and his being part of the Network can be easily proven

January 23, 2012 Letter to Judge Lee Showing the conflict of interest

04/05/2013 (article ) McLeans John Tran named first Asian-American judge in Virginia history, to
join Fairfax bench By Tom Jackman U.S. District Judge Gerald Bruce Lee tried cases against Tran in
private practice in Alexandria, then supervised his cases as a judge. Its a great day for the Commonwealth
of Virginia, said Lee, who was a Fairfax circuit judge for six years before immigrating to the fed bench in
1998. Johns an excellent lawyer whos given much of his time to our community, in the bar association and
in pro bono work. Today is a huge step forward for our judiciary and for fairness.

John Tran was involved in the collusion of Plaintiff and her girls to be harmed with drugs or rape, lying in
documents to the Supreme court, ex-parte communications et al

5. Chief Judge Supreme Court Justice Cynthia Kinser - is guilty of: Judicial Misconduct,
Criminal Misconduct, Discrimination for Religious, Social, Economic, Hierarch, Gang Type Behavior
Similar to the Klue Klux Klan, Attempt to harm Plaintiff and her Girls through Drugs & Rape, Slander
of Plaintiff to prevent Due Process, Tampering with Evidence, Mail Fraud, Violating the Law and the
9

Rules of the Supreme courts, Violation of the Judicial Cannons, Obstruction of Justice, Fraud on the
Court, TREASON, Title 18 U.S. Code 241 & 242; Title 42 U.S. Code 1981 & 1983 and other laws

Knowingly appointed a Corrupt Judge In Order for Plaintiff to go in front of the Grand Jury to ask for a
Special Grand Jury

Allowed Defendants Ilona Grenadier Heckman a lawyer, Michael Weiser Esq, Ben DiMurio, Judge John
Tran, Hillary Collyer to lie in documents submitted to the Supreme Court of Virginia

Plaintiffs appeals written by attorneys who have never lost an appeal were denied. Justice Lemons
informed Plaintiff it was by the Law to file a Motion for Law used disclosed The Motion for Law used
was denied. The Law was not used.

Filed on April 30, 2014 RECORD NO: ____110156 & 122204
(Denied Motion for Law used to deny is denied)
MOTION TO RE-OPEN DUE TO FRAUD ON THE COURT BY THE SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA
FOR RULING AGAINST THEIR OWN LAWS AND ALLOWING LAWYERS TO BE DISENGENOUS IN
COURT IN CIRCUIT COURT FILINGS AND SUPREME COURT FILINGS
FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF ALEXANDRIA VIRGINIA
CASE # CH010654

* Denied Motion for Law used to deny is denied

December 2014 through today the blog jwgrenadierisalair.blogspot.com it is pointed out by
Ilona Grenadier Heckman and her gang that Cynthia Kinser has ruled by her Religious belief
(Jewish) Discrimination for Religious reasons is obvious

6. Chief Judge Donald Haddock is guilty of: Judicial Misconduct, Criminal Misconduct,
Discrimination for Religious, Social, Economic, Hierarch, Gang Type Behavior Similar to the
Klue Klux Klan, Attempt to harm Plaintiff and her Girls through Drugs & Rape, Slander of
Plaintiff to prevent Due Process, Tampering with Evidence, Mail Fraud, Violating the Law and
the Rules of the Supreme courts, Violation of the Judicial Cannons, Obstruction of Justice,
Fraud on the Court, TREASON, Title 18 U.S. Code 241 & 242; Title 42 U.S. Code 1981 &
1983 Virginia Code 17 .1-105(b) and other laws

September 12, 2007 Recused himself by all appearance ignoring the law and the rules of the
Supreme Court of Virginia. New Evidence shows he knew the Law and Rules and knowingly,
maliciously ignored the law
May 7, 2008 You will never get a fair trial We / I LOVE Ilona Knowingly illegally choose
Judges from September 12, 2007 thru his retirement December 31, 2011
October 13, 2014 Denied access to the Grand Jury stated I was going to let you go into the
Grand Jury but, I have decided not to because I believe you are going to talk about ME. I
demand you back on December 12, 2012 to go in front of the Grand Jury which was delayed till
after his retirement of December 31, 2011 and denied and then again on February 13, 2012 when
kidnapped in another court room with witnesss
Thursday March 10, 2011 Quote from the Connection newspaper Ive been asked to say few
words about nepotism, Haddock cracked at his sons instillation ceremony, Im in favor of it

7. Chief Judge Lisa Kemler is guilty of: Judicial Misconduct, Criminal Misconduct,
Discrimination for Religious, Social, Economic, Hierarch, Gang Type Behavior Similar to the
Klue Klux Klan, Attempt to harm Plaintiff and her Girls through Drugs & Rape, Slander of
10

Plaintiff to prevent Due Process, Tampering with Evidence, Mail Fraud, Violating the Law and
the Rules of the Supreme courts, Violation of the Judicial Cannons, Obstruction of Justice,
Fraud on the Court, TREASON, Title 18 U.S. Code 241 & 242; Title 42 U.S. Code 1981 &
1983 Virginia Code 17 .1-105(b) and other laws

September of 2007 by all appearance recused herself,
February 13, 2012 Collusion to kidnap and block Plaintiff from Order by the Supreme Court
Chief Justice Cynthia Kinser to appear in front of the Grand Jury with Witnesss
October 26, 2012 Involved in tampering with Evidence mailed back to Plaintiff in, signed Order
after recusing herself in writing on or around October 2011 and by appearance September 2007
December 2012 Collusion to harm Plaintiff and her daughters,
November 2012 Collusion City of Alexandria suit,
December 2013 Collusion of Hate of Catholics, Lisa is Jewish.

8. Judge Nolan Dawkins is guilty of: Judicial Misconduct, Criminal Misconduct,
Discrimination for Religious, Social, Economic, Hierarch, Gang Type Behavior Similar to the
Klue Klux Klan, Attempt to harm Plaintiff and her Girls through Drugs & Rape, Slander of
Plaintiff to prevent Due Process, Tampering with Evidence, Mail Fraud, Violating the Law and
the Rules of the Supreme courts, Violation of the Judicial Cannons, Obstruction of Justice,
Fraud on the Court, TREASON, Title 18 U.S. Code 241 & 242; Title 42 U.S. Code 1981 &
1983 Virginia Code 17 .1-105(b) and other laws

October 13, 2010 Lied in Court when Plaintiff asked him to properly recuse himself as he had
in other court allowed her x-husband to lie in court and reduced child support payments to
$348.00. monthly - Judge Dawkins stated he was not a Judge at the time case was heard.
Judge Dawkins was appointed on April 24, 2008 Judge McGrath was chosen by Judge
Haddock in May of 2008.

October 13, 2010 slandered Plaintiff in Court when he called her a liar, when he was the liar. Plaintiff
does not have to Lie

9. Judge James Clark is guilty of: Judicial Misconduct, Criminal Misconduct, Discrimination
for Religious, Social, Economic, Hierarch, Gang Type Behavior Similar to the Klue Klux Klan,
Attempt to harm Plaintiff and her Girls through Drugs & Rape, Slander of Plaintiff to prevent
Due Process, Tampering with Evidence, Mail Fraud, Violating the Law and the Rules of the
Supreme courts, Violation of the Judicial Cannons, Obstruction of Justice, Fraud on the Court,
TREASON, Title 18 U.S. Code 241 & 242; Title 42 U.S. Code 1981 & 1983 Virginia Code 17
.1-105(b) and other laws

Judge Clark in collusion with Randy Sengel, Judge Potter, Chief Justice Supreme Court of
Virginia to prevent Plaintiff in front of Grand Jury as Demanded in Order by Chief Justice of the
Supreme court of Virginia. Who knowingly chose Judge Potter from Prince William County who
did not have jurisdiction and would work with the other Judges in kidnapping Plaintiff and her
witnesss in another court room Preventing Plaintiff asking for a Special Grand Jury to look into
the corruption and the Criminal Actions of Ilona Grenadier which James Clark is aware of as well
as Chief Justice Cynthia Kinser and Commonwealth Attorney Randy Sengel Bryan Porter

January 18, 2012 Plaintiff Filed Motion for sanctions against Randy Sengel commonwealth attorney
for letter to Judge Potter
11

January 18, 2012 Praecipe to be heard on January 25, 2012
January 25, 2012 Judge Clark refuses to hear claims not on his docket Confirms he has not
recused himself from hearing anything from Plaintiff -
February 1, 2012 - Motion filed to demand Ed Semonian Clerk of Court answer simple questions
about Grand Jury - Since Alexandria has shown in the past not to follow the rules of the courts It was
reasonable for Plaintiff to ask basic questions which he refused to answer. Most likely he doesnt
know the basic rules.
Parecipe filed on Feb 1, 2012 for Motion to be heard on February 8, 2012 by the new Judge -
Judge Clark who had not recused himself from hearing this case. Yet refused to hear Motion against
Randy Sengel.
February 2, 2012 Letter Circuit Court of Alexandria Motion Sanctions against Ed Semonian to be
heard at 9am February 13, 2012 by Judge Potter.
February 7, 2012 Letter to Circuit Court Judges & Ed Semonian Plaintiff planed on being in court on
February 8, 2012 that Judge Clark had not recused himself.
February 8, 2012 Judge Clark in court confirms he has not recused himself from the matter and that
it isnt on his docket. Yet Judge Clark then turns to a Lawyer and says yes I am going to hear this
even though it is not on my docket.
September 26, 2012 Order awarding Sections to Ben DiMuro / John Tran, Michael Weiser
Affidavit shows more phone calls to Judges chambers then to their own clients refused Plaintiff to call
Ilona Grenadier Heckman as a witness to protect her
October 12, 2013 Mailed back evidence entered into court on September 26, 2014 Mail fraud,
Tampering with evidence, Obstruction of Justice - Collusion of Judicial Misconduct etc

Actions by Judge Clark are and continue to be irrational and without cause, his actions show his
collusion with other Defendants to physically and emotionally to harm Plaintiff.

December 2013 Requested of Ilona to have Plaintiff harmed by Mark / Michael Stuart by drugging
Plaintiff and getting inappropriate sexual photos of Plaintiff or to

July 16,2014 Obvious Ex Parte Communications with a special Order demanding Plaintiff to COA
Court on July 23, 2014 which he does not have Jurisdiction. That all his Orders are VOID

July 23, 2014 Plaintiff by all appearance with the collusion of Ben DiMuro is to be in Court in the City of
Alexandria Va so Ben DiMuro can further confuse two cases so he can try and have it clarified so it will
not show the appearance that he LIED IN Prince William Court in April of 2014. Judge Clark has
received a letter saying he should recuse himself and this suit is going to be filed. That lawyer Ben
DiMuro will not work with Plaintiff who needs at a minimum 6 hours to call 9 witnesss to present her side
of the case.

That Judge Clark requested in October / November / December 2012 of Defendants information to make
Plaintiff incompetent. That the United States District Court of the District of Columbia Judge Beryl A.
Howell gave him that when she allowed Loretta Lax Miller to put into the Record just that. That Judge
Clark just like Judge Howell and Judge Boasberg have tampered with evidence that Shows what Ilona
Grenadier Heckman owes Plaintiff, Obstructed Justice and Mail Fraud with the Help of the Clerks of their
Courts

12

10. Judge Thomas Fortkort - Attorneys Arbitration and Mediation, Inc - is guilty of:
Judicial Misconduct, Criminal Misconduct, Discrimination for Religious, Social, Economic,
Hierarch, Gang Type Behavior Similar to the Klue Klux Klan, Attempt to harm Plaintiff and her
Girls through Drugs & Rape, Slander of Plaintiff to prevent Due Process, Tampering with
Evidence, Mail Fraud, Violating the Law and the Rules of the Supreme courts, Violation of the
Judicial Cannons, Obstruction of Justice, Fraud on the Court, TREASON, Title 18 U.S. Code
241 & 242; Title 42 U.S. Code 1981 & 1983 Virginia Code 17 .1-105(b) and other laws

December 5, 2007 Asked by his friend Chief Judge Donald Haddock after Judge Hoss from
Prince William County refused to hear a case and rule the way Judge Haddock wanted him to
In favor of Ilona Grenadier Heckman a lawyer who had lied in court, and was guilty of several
criminal actions. Judge Fortkort ruled how he was told to in favor of Ilona Grenadier Heckman
even though Ilona a lawyer had lied in court.

11. Judge J. Howe Brown - is guilty of: Judicial Misconduct, Criminal Misconduct,
Discrimination for Religious, Social, Economic, Hierarch, Gang Type Behavior Similar to the
Klue Klux Klan, Attempt to harm Plaintiff and her Girls through Drugs & Rape, Slander of
Plaintiff to prevent Due Process, Tampering with Evidence, Mail Fraud, Violating the Law and
the Rules of the Supreme courts, Violation of the Judicial Cannons, Obstruction of Justice,
Fraud on the Court, TREASON, Title 18 U.S. Code 241 & 242; Title 42 U.S. Code 1981 &
1983 Virginia Code 17 .1-105(b) and other laws

February 13, 2008 Judge Brown chosen by his good friend Judge Haddock to rule in Ilonas favor did
just that. Plaintiff had already turned everything over to Ilona yet Judge Brown Ordered Plaintiff to
Compel. That Ilona bragged about what good friends they were.
May 7, 2008 Judge Brown chosen by his good friend Judge Haddock to rule on Motion for Default for
Ilona a lawyer lying in filed Counterclaim and Cross-Complaint in the court filed on February 27, 2008,
For letters Defendant sent bulling, threatening Plaintiff, For non-response to letters to try and set a new
date for depositions or trial date - Judge Brown rules in favor of Ilona Empowering her to turn to
Plaintiff a - Judge Brown calls me all the time for FREE legal advice We are good friends
J uly 9, 2008 Judge Brown chosen by his good friend Judge Haddock to Rule on Motion for Default
Ilona a lawyer has lied in Admissions, in Court & in her Counterclaim and Cross complaint, Has sent
letters Bulling and Threatening Plaintiff if Plaintiff did not drop suit May 8, 2008 and May 21, 2008. Judge
Brown Rules in favor of Ilona who gives him FREE Legal advice and is a good friend

12. Judge James J. McGrath - Judicial Solutions is guilty of: Judicial Misconduct,
Criminal Misconduct, Discrimination for Religious, Social, Economic, Hierarch, Gang Type
Behavior Similar to the Klue Klux Klan, Attempt to harm Plaintiff and her Girls through Drugs &
Rape, Slander of Plaintiff to prevent Due Process, Tampering with Evidence, Mail Fraud,
Violating the Law and the Rules of the Supreme courts, Violation of the Judicial Cannons,
Obstruction of Justice, Fraud on the Court, TREASON, Title 18 U.S. Code 241 & 242; Title 42
U.S. Code 1981 & 1983 Virginia Code 17 .1-105(b) and other laws

September 11, 2008 Kangaroo Court day by Judge McGrath working with Judge Kloch, VERY GOOD
friend of Judge Haddock. It could not be more obvious that Judge McGrath would rule for Ilona he
allowed Defendants to lie in court and make a Mockery of the system. By the afternoon it was clear the
courts were going through the motions of trying to appear Fair when all they were doing was trying to
make sure one of their own was able to steal from Plaintiff and be allowed to get away with whatever she
wanted. Ilona was allowed to bring up the theft of money through her law firm of over $95,000 from the
13

Sonia Grenadier Trust - When Plaintiff went to question Ilona she was warned by the Judge he would
allow no questions of her that he did not approve of. KANGAROO COURT

13. Judge Richard Bowen Potter (PWC) is guilty of: Judicial Misconduct, Criminal
Misconduct, Discrimination for Religious, Social, Economic, Hierarch, Gang Type Behavior
Similar to the Klue Klux Klan, Attempt to harm Plaintiff and her Girls through Drugs & Rape,
Slander of Plaintiff to prevent Due Process, Tampering with Evidence, Mail Fraud, Violating the
Law and the Rules of the Supreme courts, Violation of the Judicial Cannons, Obstruction of
Justice, Fraud on the Court, TREASON, Title 18 U.S. Code 241 & 242; Title 42 U.S. Code
1981 & 1983 Virginia Code 17 .1-105(b) and other laws

On October 11, 2011 Chief Judge Donald M. Haddock - informed Plaintiff first she would be
allowed in front of the Grand Jury. Chief Judge Donald M. Haddock who had informed Plaintiff back
in 2007 that Plaintiff could not get a fair trial as WE LOVE ILONA now informs Plaintiff he was
going to let her go in front of the Grand Jury but has decided not to as he believes Plaintiff is going to
talk about him. . Demanded Plaintiff back on December 12, 2011 to go in front of the Grand Jury.
This was then delayed and denied by Corrupt Judge Richard Bowen Potter who with collusion of
Commonwealth Attorney Randy Sengel denied access to the Grand jury on February 13, 2012.
September of 2011 Ilona and her attorney had made a generous donation for his portrait.
The Circuit Court of Alexandria did not file the paper work through the regular channels of the
Supreme Court of Virginia. It is believed Richard Bowen Potter was chosen with the support of the
Supreme Court of Virginia to work in collusion with the other Defendants.
November 21, 2011 Order appointing Judge Richard Bowen Potter by The Supreme Court Chief
Justice Cynthia D. Kinser To preside over grand jury proceedings on Monday, February 13,
2012

November 21, 2011 Letter from Patricia G. Davis to Judge Richard B. Potter that he will be presiding
over the regular session of the Grand Jury. There is one matter, In Re : Grand J ury Request of
J anice W. Grenadier, scheduled that the Judges have recused themselves from hearing.

She went on to say: By copy of this letter to Chief Judge Haddock and Mr. Semonian, I am advising
them of your agreement to preside on February 13
th
. Ms. Diane Fiske, court administrator, is
available to assist you. Please contact Ms. Fiske at 703-746-4123.

January 4, 2012 Letter Randy Sengel Commonwealth Attorney to Judge Potter informing him to
refuse JWG in front of the Grand Jury as Plaintiff is not one of his witnesss ( letter can be found
under Exhibit 16)
Plaintiff contacts Supreme Court regarding letter and is informed anyone can write to a Judge
Question: When Plaintiff wrote to the Chief Justice the letter was never given to him that Plaintiff had
to write the Clerk of Court Patricia Harrington who ignored her.
January 4, 2012 Letter from Meghan S. Roberts threatening Plaintiff with legal action over $200.
For infractions of code a gutter & RV parked in my driveway. Collusion with Randy Sengel in attempt
to scare/intimidate Plaintiff.
January 7, 2012 Letter JWG to Meghan S. Roberts no intention of paying and reason why that she
had spoken with the Code Enforcement and he had said to just call him when it was done.
January 9, 2012 Letter to The Honorable Cynthia Kinser Chief Justice of the Virginia Supreme Court
- Plaintiff did not send after conversation with Doug Robelen that anyone can write a Judge a letter.
The issue is back in the Circuit Court and must be dealt with in the Circuit Court.
14

January 18, 2012 Filed Motion for sanctions against Randy Sengel commonwealth attorney for letter
to Judge Potter.
January 18, 2012 Praecipe to be heard on January 25, 2012
January 20, 2012 Letter from Law Clerk Circuit Court of Alexandria that my Motion for Sanctions
against Mr. Sengel would be heard by Judge Potter. Once again the Circuit Court of Alexandria does
not follow the rules.
February 1, 2012 - Motion filed to demand Ed Semonian Clerk of Court answer simple questions
about Grand Jury - Since Alexandria has shown in the past not to follow the rules of the courts It was
reasonable for Plaintiff to ask basic questions which he refused to answer. Most likely he doesnt
know the basic rules.
February 2, 2012 Letter Circuit Court of Alexandria Motion Sanctions against Ed Semonian to be
heard at 9am February 13, 2012 by Judge Potter.
February 7, 2012 Letter to Circuit Court Judges & Ed Semonian Plaintiff planed on being in court on
February 8, 2012 that Judge Clark had not recused himself.
February 8, 2012 Judge Clark in court confirms he has not recused himself from the matter and that
it isnt on his docket. Yet Judge Clark then turns and says yes I am going to hear this even though it
is not on my docket.
February 13, 2012 Kidnapping of JWG in court room 4, keeping her from the Grand Jury - Final
Order by Judge Richard Potter She and her witnesses are Denied in front of the Grand Jury he
and Randy Sengel Commonwealth Attorney are now the Gate Keepers / GOD of the Grand Jury
The Circuit Court of Alexandria after being disingenuous on October 11, 2012 held a Mickey Mouse
type hearing on February 13, 2011 also called Kangaroo Court

Judge Potter points out Plaintiff had not paid filing fees, yet Ed Semonian clerk of Court never sent a
deficiency notice nor when Plaintiff made filings never asked for such fee.

Judge Potter would not make a move in court without the permission of Randy Sengel. This is illegal
and unprofessional of any Judge. He abused his authority, and acted outside the Color of the
Law. It is a federal crime for anyone acting under color of law willfully to deprive or conspire
to deprive a person of a right protected by the Constitution or U.S. law.

14. Chief Judge Mary Grace OBrien (PWC) is guilty of: Judicial Misconduct, Criminal
Misconduct, Discrimination for Religious, Social, Economic, Hierarch, Gang Type Behavior
Similar to the Klue Klux Klan, Slander of Plaintiff to prevent Due Process, Tampering with
Evidence, Mail Fraud, Violating the Law and the Rules of the Supreme courts, Violation of the
Judicial Cannons, Obstruction of Justice, Fraud on the Court, TREASON, Title 18 U.S. Code
241 & 242; Title 42 U.S. Code 1981 & 1983 Virginia Code 17 .1-105(b) and other laws

December 27, 1990 Judge Percy Thornton Jr., Judge H. Selwyn Smith, Judge Herman A.
Whisenant Jr., Judge Frank A. Hoss, Jr., Judge William D. Hamblen, filed the following Order to
the Supreme Court of Virginia: (Plaintiff found this by chance on or around April 11, 2014)

Order

Ilona Ely Grenadier , one of the Defendants in the above-styled Chancery No. 30211, is
a member of the local Bar who regularly practices law before this Court. Therefore, the
Judges of the Thirty-First Judicial Circuit deem it improper fo any one of them to preside
15

in this case, and the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court is requested to designate
another circuit court judge to preside over this case.

Entered 27
th
Day of December, 1990
Signed by : Judge Percy Thornton Jr., Judge H. Selwyn Smith, Judge
Herman A. Whisenant Jr., Judge Frank A. Hoss, Jr., Judge William D. Hamblen


November of 2007 Judge Hoss refused to do the favor of rulling on case against Ilona Grenadier
as a favor for Judge Haddock. Which shows in September of 2007 when the Slippery Slope
started the Judges knew exactly what they were doing.

April 4, 2014 Chief Judge Mary Grace OBrien supported and allowed Ben DiMuro lawyer for Ilona
Grenadier Heckman to Lie in Court, Lie in Court documents and awarded him over $12,000.00 in
legal fees. Judge OBrien did not have Jurisdiction, and the decision had been decided prior to court.
Judge OBrien would not allow Plaintiff to call her witnesss
15. Judge Richard J McCue (Arlington) is guilty of: Judicial Misconduct, Criminal
Misconduct, Discrimination for Religious, Social, Economic, Hierarch, Gang Type Behavior
Similar to the Klue Klux Klan, Attempt to harm Plaintiff and her Girls through Drugs & Rape,
Slander of Plaintiff to prevent Due Process, Tampering with Evidence, Mail Fraud, Violating the
Law and the Rules of the Supreme courts, Violation of the Judicial Cannons, Obstruction of
Justice, Fraud on the Court, TREASON, Title 18 U.S. Code 241 & 242; Title 42 U.S. Code
1981 & 1983 Virginia Code 17 .1-105(b) and other laws

An Arlington County Judge that Lied in court in collusion with Megan Roberts, George McAndrews and James
Banks (City of Alexandria Attorneys) to intimidate and in collusion with Randy Sengel Commonwealth
Attorney to Intimidate and harm Plaintiff - Collusion on charges against home for a gutter barley not attached
to home due to Earth Quake where no water was entering Plaintiffs home. That with a moratorium on City
Employees working Saturdays Timothy Lawmaster came to Plaintiffs home the Saturday after Thanksgiving.
Kangaroo Court used to harass Plaintiff and use gang like intimidation.
16. Edward Davis Virginia State Bar is guilty of: Judicial Misconduct, Criminal Misconduct,
Discrimination for Religious, Social, Economic, Hierarch, Gang Type Behavior Similar to the Klue
Klux Klan, Attempt to harm Plaintiff and her Girls through Drugs & Rape, Slander of Plaintiff to
prevent Due Process, Tampering with Evidence, Mail Fraud, Violating the Law and the Rules of the
Supreme courts, Violation of the Judicial Cannons, Obstruction of Justice, Fraud on the Court,
TREASON, Title 18 U.S. Code 241 & 242; Title 42 U.S. Code 1981 & 1983 and other laws

The VSB (Virginia State Bar) July of 2008 Plaintiff filed a complaint written by a lawyer who
teaches ethics for the VSB. The complaint was ignored Plaintiff would file several other
complaints Defendant Ilona hired Ben DiMuro a past President of the VSB and all
complaints were ignored and not even acknowledges by the Virginia State Bar Edward
Davis. Ben DiMuro has left in his will when he and his wife Sandy pass 10% will be left to the
Bar.

17. James Michael McCauley Virginia State Bar is guilty of: Judicial Misconduct, Criminal
Misconduct, Discrimination for Religious, Social, Economic, Hierarch, Gang Type Behavior Similar to
the Klue Klux Klan, Attempt to harm Plaintiff and her Girls through Drugs & Rape, Slander of Plaintiff
16

to prevent Due Process, Tampering with Evidence, Mail Fraud, Violating the Law and the Rules of the
Supreme courts, Violation of the Judicial Cannons, Obstruction of Justice, Fraud on the Court,
TREASON, Title 18 U.S. Code 241 & 242; Title 42 U.S. Code 1981 & 1983 and other laws

December of 2010 through January 2012 VSB Ethics attorney James Michael McCaluley
contacted Plaintiff and scammed her. He met with Plaintiff in Arlington Virginia. Asked
Plaintiff to mail all her documents and information to his home. He would review it. He Lied.
He scammed Plaintiff. Never planning on reviewing documents, from his actions.


18. Ilona Grenadier Grenadier. Anderson, Starace, Duffett & Kieser is guilty of: Perjury,
Obstruction of Justice, Aiding and abetting obstruction of Justice, Fraud on the Court, Involvement of
Forgery, Theft of money from the Sonia Grenadier Trust account through her law office for great
personal gain over $10 Million in Real Estate, Theft of Herman Grenadier, joint and several liability,
malpractice, Bribery, Abuse of her Oath of Office, Conspiracy, Collusion, Gang like activity mirror
image to the Klue Klux Klan, Miscarriage of Justice, preventing Due Process, conflict of interest
related to the practice of law, violating code of ethics, has liability to her victims, has violated Plaintiffs
Religious, Political, Social, United state Constitutional, Virginia Constitutional and Civil Rights, Breach
of Fiduciary Duties, Violating RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT, Title 18 US Code 241
Conspiracy against rights, and 242 Deprivation of rights under color of law, Retaliatory & Retribution
actions, Treason, Title VI Civil Rights Act of 1964 Title VI, 42 U.S.C. 2000d et seq., was enacted as
part of the landmark Civil Rights Act of 1964, 18 USC 912. With her Intention to 18 USC 1341 -
Frauds and swindles, Defraud, Breach of Contract, Arbitrary and Capricious behavior, Committed
Fraud on the Court, 18.2-498.3. Misrepresentations prohibited, 18.2-172 - J udicial Misconduct;
Criminal Misconduct; Mail Fraud; Honest Serves Fraud; Extortion; Harassment; Gang activity;
Racketeering; Retaliation; Discrimination; et al. not limited to: decisions made in bad faith for a
corrupt purpose, deliberately and intentionally failing to follow the law; Extrinsic fraud; Egregious legal
errors; Violation of Procedural Rules; Violation of Due Process; uttering, etc., other writings et al. All
of above charges will and can be proven with letters, documents, witnesses who have also
been harmed by the actions of Plaintiff.

That Ilona Grenadier Heckman orchestrated and executed since February 14, 1986 the
knowledgeable manipulation of Plaintiff and others. That the corruption in the Judicial
System is deliberate and with knowledge, in its planning to harm Plaintiff.

February 14, 1986 Started the lies, the manipulation
November 30, 2007 Ilona Big Guns Washingtons top 800 Lawyers article
Letter dated February 8, 2008 from Ilona to Janice riddled with lies 3
rd
page goes into David
sleeping with his sister
September 18, 2008 Tax record to prove Grenadier still owned Southway Terrace 2
nd
page of letter
February 8, 2008 Ilona implies Southway has been sold. Lie
February 27, 2008 Ilonas CounterClaim and Cross-Complaint full of lies
May 21, 2008 Letter from Ilona to Janice denying her lies, and further lies on Bellefonte file
E-mails from July 24 July 26, 2008 riddled with Ilona lies.
February 2009 Washingtonian top 25 Divorce attorneys includes Ilona and is referred to as A
tough cookie for cases that might not be amicable, she can mix it up in a state where the old-boy
network is strong
17


March 2009 Alexandria Bar Thanks Ilona law firm for their generosity in table sponsors
November 2011 OYEZ Alexandria Bar Thank-you to Portrait fund for Judge Haddock includes
Ilona and her attorney Ben DiMuros law firm * In October of 2011 Judge Haddock blocked Plaintiff
from going in front of grand jury against him and Ilona.
November 2011 OYEZ Thank you for a party that looks like a cost of over $100,000. For most of
above the Defendants

May 13, 2012 Letter from Janice to Ilona severing her client relationship has worked as Plaintiffs
lawyer since March of 1990 forward demanding her to not higher another attorney Which Plaintiff
did not do, until later and hid Ilonas secrets of stealing over $95,000 from the Sonia Grenadier Trust
May 16, 2012 Letter from John Tran DiMuroGinsburg denying relationship
Manta - showing David Grenadier working out of Grenadier et al law firm, using same number
for Mr. Vernon Bookkeeping Services

Owed to Plaintiff by Ilona Grenadier Heckman / GIC: BY RIGHT and BY Law

Sonia Grenadier Trust
A. Note $ 30,000.00 /10% Interest $ 307,576.25
i. Prevented Plaintiff from losing her Law License and going to
ii. Jail as Jim Arthur did.
B. Clients which Defendant loss due to the Note(10% int) $2,471,940.78
a. Plaintiff demanded acting as Defendants lawyer that she
b. had to give up her client the very min cost to that was
c. the listings for the new homes

C. Real Estate
Bellefonte Ave Personal ownership 50% (10% int) $ 504,003.25
GIC Properties at least 24.5% $3,000.000.00
a. (accounting of sales, rents, depreciation etc needed)
Southway / SouthHampton Terrace at least 24.5 %
i. $4,000,000.00
b. ( an accounting for rents, depreciation, income etc needed)
c. The apartments has Rental income of approx. $95.000 monthly
Monroe Ave at least 24.5% $ 500,000.00
d. (accounting for rents income needed , etc)

D. Bankruptcy That Defendant would not have been in so is owed legal fees and expenses
Legal Fees $ 319,613.81
Expenses / Damages $ TBD

E. Damages for actions that were and still are willful acts that are malicious, violent, oppressive,
fraudulent, wanton and grossly reckless in collusion with others.
a. Damages go back to the first known Lie / Fraud to Defendant February 14, 1986

F. By all appearance Ilona Grenadier is bringing in around $150,000, a month in rent from properties
most likely more. Majority of this rental income is from properties acquired by stealing money from
the Sonia Grenadier Trust and Janice Wolk Grenadier. That Defendant by right owns at least 24.5%
of all properties BY RIGHT & VIRGINIA LAW.

18

G. That on September 4, 2013 Ilona Grenadier Heckman intervened into Defendants divorce.
That Defendant at that point started looking closely at the facts and everyone that was involved with the
Divorce, GIC, Bellefonte, Bankruptcy Court. The truth that defendant was unaware of came out.

H. Ilona Grenadier Heckman from February 14, 1986 had manipulated, lied to, and stolen from the Sonia
Grenadier Trust and Janice Wolk Grenadier to create a Real Estate Empire. That Ilona Grenadier
Heckman is a Gang Leader of Racketeering, Discrimination and Corruption in the Virginia
Judicial System.

19. Heather Jenquine - Grenadier Law et al - is guilty of: Judicial Misconduct, Criminal
Misconduct, Discrimination for Religious, Social, Economic, Hierarch, Gang Type Behavior Similar
to the Klue Klux Klan, Attempt to harm Plaintiff and her Girls through Drugs & Rape, Slander of
Plaintiff to prevent Due Process, Tampering with Evidence, Mail Fraud, Violating the Law and the
Rules of the Supreme courts, Violation of the Judicial Cannons, Obstruction of Justice, Fraud on
the Court, TREASON, Title 18 U.S. Code 241 & 242; Title 42 U.S. Code 1981 & 1983 and other
laws

Represented Ilona Grenadier Heckman in documents and court. Lawyer at Grenadier, Anderson,
Starace, Duffitt and Keisler. Aware of Criminal actions of all and have ignored them
President of the Alexandria Bar Chapter

February 13, 2008 Orders by Judge Brown represented by Heather Jenquine counsel for Ilona
Grenadier
August 27, 2008 Defendant Ilona Grenadiers Exhibit and Witness List filed by Heather Jenquine
counsel for Ilona
May 2012 Last Presidents Letter for OYEZ President of Alexandria Bar

20. Ben DiMuro - DiMuroGinsberg is guilty of: Judicial Misconduct, Criminal Misconduct,
Discrimination for Religious, Social, Economic, Hierarch, Gang Type Behavior Similar to the Klue
Klux Klan, Attempt to harm Plaintiff and her Girls through Drugs & Rape, Slander of Plaintiff to
prevent Due Process, Tampering with Evidence, Mail Fraud, Violating the Law and the Rules of
the Supreme courts, Violation of the Judicial Cannons, Obstruction of Justice, Fraud on the Court,
TREASON, Title 18 U.S. Code 241 & 242; Title 42 U.S. Code 1981 & 1983 and other laws
Bribery, perjury, Fraud on the Court, conspiracy/collusion to obstruct due process, Miscarriage of
Justice, Appearance of Justice, conflict of interest, conflict of interest recusal, Breach of Fiduciary
duties, ignoring his Oath of Office, Conspiracy against rights, and other violations of the VSB
duties of an officer of the court.

Past President of the Virginia State Bar, which he helps support through the interest of his Escrow
Account? Has designated 10% of his and his wife Sandys estate to the Virginia Law Foundation.
Partner to DiMuroGinsburg law firm, which also John Tran & Hillary Collyer, Andrea Mosley of
DiMuroGinsburg for their actions are Defendants in this suit.

April of 1989 twice met with JWG and her then husband David to discuss a fire that he was
representing GIC/Monroe Ave partnership for the overage on the insurance. David was 49% owner
of GIC at the time.

19

April 17, 2009 Wrote threatening letter that JWG was trying to Extort money from Ilona - Money that
Ilona owed JWG from malicious manipulation, and stealing it from JWG. Through misc attached
letters supports the lies of Ilona Grenadier even after given the evidence.

July 2009 to this date is involved with e-mails from the Grenadiers, Loretta Lax Miller aka
Muggy Cat to myself in the collusion of their racist bigot attitude to the fact I raised by girls Catholic.
Calling the Pope a wanker. To harass and intimidate Plaintiff and her girls

October of 2009 with the collusion of Randy Sengel - Commonwealth Attorney of the City of
Alexandria, using bullying and scare tactics to get JWG charged with the Extortion game he had
come up with in April of 2009 when hired by Ilona Grenadier and her law firm, to use whatever illegal
and unprofessional tactics it took to dispose of exposer to her criminal activities. The Extortion
issue with Randy Sengel bringing in the City of Alexandria Police Charles Pak to try and intimidate
JWG.

Feb 2, 2011 Lied in Respondents Joint Motion to Dismiss Petition for Appeal Dated Feb 2, 2011 in
the Supreme Court of Virginia on Page 2 Paragraph 2 - Here, Petitioner has failed to ensure that the
record contains either transcripts or a written statement of facts.

August of 2011 involved in ex-parte communications for the delay of the Motion for
Reconsideration to be heard in August of 2011.

October of 2011 publically thanked for the generous donation to Judge Haddocks Portrait Fund
Thank you for helping me with my client Ilona Ely Freedman Grenadier Heckman which continued
in October of 2011 when Judge Haddock denied JWG in front of a Grand Jury.

He and his law firm has worked in collusion with the actions of the City of Alexandria, Judges,
Commonwealth Attorney, Clerk of Court, VSB, JIRC, Courts of Justice, the Democratic party,
Virginia Legislators, Supreme Court of Virginia has acted intentionally, willfully, wantonly, and
maliciously in their collusion to protect Ilona Ely Freedman Grenadier Heckman founding partner to
the law firm Grenadier, Anderson, Stracae, Duffett & Kiesler, the late wife of Judge Albert Grenadier,
from being held responsible for her and her law firms criminal activity. Ben DiMuros blatant abusive
actions in regard to the United States of America Constitution, Virginia Constitution, Civil Rights,
religious rights of a citizen.

Ben DiMuro and his firm have worked in collusion to Intimidate, Maliciously Manipulate Janice Wolk
Grenadier using Scare Tactics, the Alexandria Police, and the Courts of Virginia, motivated by
financial interests and cronyism. Causing Janice Wolk Grenadier to suffer mentally and financially
as well has her children innocent victims from his and their actions. The acts of Mr. DiMuro are
egregious and vicious against Janice a pro se, single mom with her 2 girls because they are Catholic
and are x communicated from the Old Boy Network

That on April 4, 2014 Ben DiMuro Lied in court in Prince William County and Lied in documents
submitted to the courts.
That on July 16, 2014 Ex Parte communications with Judge Clark

20

That on July 23, 2014 Ben DiMuro hopes to again to manipulate the Judicial System to protect his
Client Ilona Grenadier Heckman from being accountable for her actions

Ben DiMuro is being paid by Alps Insurance according to an e-mail from Alps Insurance Co.

That Ben DiMuro, John Tran & Hillary Collyer, and Andrea Mosley ccd each other regularly on
documents submitted with the Court, letters, e-mails sent to JWG. Making an action of one an
action of all Four - DiMuroGinsberg Law firm.

21. Hillary J. Collyer - DiMuro Ginsberg / Lasher et al is guilty of: Judicial Misconduct,
Criminal Misconduct, Discrimination for Religious, Social, Economic, Hierarch, Gang Type
Behavior Similar to the Klue Klux Klan, Attempt to harm Plaintiff and her Girls through Drugs &
Rape, Slander of Plaintiff to prevent Due Process, Tampering with Evidence, Mail Fraud, Violating
the Law and the Rules of the Supreme courts, Violation of the Judicial Cannons, Obstruction of
Justice, Fraud on the Court, TREASON, Title 18 U.S. Code 241 & 242; Title 42 U.S. Code 1981
& 1983 Bribery, perjury, Fraud on the Court, conspiracy/collusion to obstruct due process,
Miscarriage of Justice, Appearance of Justice, conflict of interest, conflict of interest recusal,
Breach of Fiduciary duties, ignoring his Oath of Office, Conspiracy against rights, and other
violations of the VSB duties of an officer of the court. and other laws

See Ben DiMuro # 20, John Tran & Hillary Collyer, and Andrea Mosley ccd each other regularly on
documents submitted with the Court, letters, e-mails sent to JWG. Making an action of one an
action of all Four - DiMuroGinsberg Law firm.

Hillary Collyer has left DiMuroGinsberg so Lasher et al her new law firm will be included in this suit.

22. Judge John Tran - DiMuro Ginsberg / Fairfax County Judge is guilty of: Judicial
Misconduct, Criminal Misconduct, Discrimination for Religious, Social, Economic, Hierarch, Gang
Type Behavior Similar to the Klue Klux Klan, Attempt to harm Plaintiff and her Girls through Drugs
& Rape, Slander of Plaintiff to prevent Due Process, Tampering with Evidence, Mail Fraud,
Violating the Law and the Rules of the Supreme courts, Violation of the Judicial Cannons,
Obstruction of Justice, Fraud on the Court, TREASON, Title 18 U.S. Code 241 & 242; Title 42
U.S. Code 1981 & 1983 Bribery, perjury, Fraud on the Court, conspiracy/collusion to obstruct due
process, Miscarriage of Justice, Appearance of Justice, conflict of interest, conflict of interest
recusal, Breach of Fiduciary duties, ignoring his Oath of Office, Conspiracy against rights, and
other violations of the VSB duties of an officer of the court. and other laws

04/05/2013 - McLeans John Tran named first Asian-American judge in Virginia history, to join
Fairfax bench By Tom Jackman U.S. District Judge Gerald Bruce Lee tried cases against Tran in private
practice in Alexandria, then supervised his cases as a judge. Its a great day for the Commonwealth of
Virginia, said Lee, who was a Fairfax circuit judge for six years before immigrating to the fed bench in 1998.
Johns an excellent lawyer whos given much of his time to our community, in the bar association and in pro
bono work. Today is a huge step forward for our judiciary and for fairness.

John Tran was involved in the collusion of Plaintiff and her girls to be harmed, lying in documents to the
Supreme court, ex-parte communications et al
21

See Ben DiMuro # 20 , John Tran & Hillary Collyer, and Andrea Mosley ccd each other regularly on
documents submitted with the Court, letters, e-mails sent to JWG. Making an action of one an action of
all Four - DiMuroGinsberg Law firm.

23. Andrea Molsley - DiMruoGinsberg is guilty of: Judicial Misconduct, Criminal Misconduct,
Discrimination for Religious, Social, Economic, Hierarch, Gang Type Behavior Similar to the Klue
Klux Klan, Attempt to harm Plaintiff and her Girls through Drugs & Rape, Slander of Plaintiff to
prevent Due Process, Tampering with Evidence, Mail Fraud, Violating the Law and the Rules of the
Supreme courts, Violation of the Judicial Cannons, Obstruction of Justice, Fraud on the Court,
TREASON, Title 18 U.S. Code 241 & 242; Title 42 U.S. Code 1981 & 1983 Bribery, perjury, Fraud
on the Court, conspiracy/collusion to obstruct due process, Miscarriage of Justice, Appearance of
Justice, conflict of interest, conflict of interest recusal, Breach of Fiduciary duties, ignoring his Oath of
Office, Conspiracy against rights, and other violations of the VSB duties of an officer of the court. and
other laws

See Ben DiMuro # 20, John Tran & Hillary Collyer, and Andrea Mosley ccd each other regularly on
documents submitted with the Court, letters, e-mails sent to JWG. Making an action of one an action of
all Four - DiMuroGinsberg Law firm.

24. Michael Weiser Esq is guilty of: Judicial Misconduct, Criminal Misconduct, Discrimination for
Religious, Social, Economic, Hierarch, Gang Type Behavior Similar to the Klue Klux Klan, Attempt to harm
Plaintiff and her Girls through Drugs & Rape, Slander of Plaintiff to prevent Due Process, Tampering with
Evidence, Mail Fraud, Violating the Law and the Rules of the Supreme courts, Violation of the Judicial Cannons,
Obstruction of Justice, Fraud on the Court, TREASON, Title 18 U.S. Code 241 & 242; Title 42 U.S. Code
1981 & 1983 Bribery, perjury, Fraud on the Court, conspiracy/collusion to obstruct due process, Miscarriage of
Justice, Appearance of Justice, conflict of interest, conflict of interest recusal, Breach of Fiduciary duties,
ignoring his Oath of Office, Conspiracy against rights, and other violations of the VSB duties of an officer of the
court. and other laws

Lied in Court documents to the Bankruptcy Court, Lied in Court documents to the Supreme Court of
Virginia, In affidavit showed more phone calls to Judges Chambers then to his own client, Other
situations show he was in collusion with the Judges to prevent Due Process

July 26, 2010 Michael Weiser filed with the COA Circuit Court an Opposition to Motion at 4.54 seconds
before 5pm with never reaching out to JWG that there was an issue with the date or could be an issue
with the date of July 28, 2011 for Motion to be heard.
July 30, 2010 Ilona Grenadier files her opposition -
Question: Michael Weiser, Ilona Grenadier and the Judges were in collusion to once again prevent due
process, in a reasonable time. Justice delayed is Justice denied.
February 3, 2011 Respondents Joint Motion to Dismiss Petition for Appeal with Supreme Court of
Virginia Mr. Weiser is Disingenuous with the Supreme Court when he states on

22

September 26, 2014 Affidavit of legal fees more calls to Judges chambers then to his
client, is in collusion with Ben DiMuro / DiMuroGinsberg
25. Ann Schmidt - Reed Smith is guilty of: Judicial Misconduct, Criminal Misconduct,
Discrimination for Religious, Social, Economic, Hierarch, Gang Type Behavior Similar to the Klue
Klux Klan, Slander of Plaintiff to prevent Due Process, Tampering with Evidence, Mail Fraud,
Violating the Law and the Rules of the Supreme courts, Violation of the Judicial Cannons, Obstruction
of Justice, Fraud on the Court, TREASON, Title 18 U.S. Code 241 & 242; Title 42 U.S. Code 1981
& 1983 and other laws

Lied in court documents to the Bankruptcy Court on different occasions, Was in collusion with the theft
of Plaintiffs property with Defendant Ilona a lawyer, went out of her way to take advantage of Plaintiff
who was Pro Se Presenting to the court what would benefit Ilona and not Plaintiff or her creditors


26. Lana Manitta Rich Rosenthal Brincfield Manitta Dzubin & Kroger LLP is guilty of:
Judicial Misconduct, Criminal Misconduct, Discrimination for Religious, Social, Economic, Hierarch,
Gang Type Behavior Similar to the Klue Klux Klan, Attempt to harm Plaintiff and her Girls through
Drugs & Rape, Slander of Plaintiff to prevent Due Process, Tampering with Evidence, Mail Fraud,
Violating the Law and the Rules of the Supreme courts, Violation of the Judicial Cannons, Obstruction
of Justice, Fraud on the Court, TREASON, Title 18 U.S. Code 241 & 242; Title 42 U.S. Code 1981
& 1983 and other laws
27. Megan Roberts is guilty of: Judicial Misconduct, Criminal Misconduct, Discrimination for
Religious, Social, Economic, Hierarch, Gang Type Behavior Similar to the Klue Klux Klan, Attempt to
harm Plaintiff and her Girls through Drugs & Rape, Slander of Plaintiff to prevent Due Process,
Tampering with Evidence, Mail Fraud, Violating the Law and the Rules of the Supreme courts,
Violation of the Judicial Cannons, Obstruction of Justice, Fraud on the Court, TREASON, Title 18
U.S. Code 241 & 242; Title 42 U.S. Code 1981 & 1983 and other laws

January 4, 2012 Letter from Meghan S. Roberts threatening Plaintiff with legal action over $200. For
infractions of code a gutter & RV parked in my driveway. Collusion with Randy Sengel in attempt to
scare/intimidate Plaintiff.
Megan S. Roberts attorney for the City of Alexandria, abusive actions towards JWG are
RETRIBUTION and RETALIATORY ACTIONS for JWG exposing corruption by several
taxpayer paid employees of the Courts of the City of Alexandria. RETALIATORY actions are
not legal. Megan S. Roberts in collusion with
The actions of the City of Alexandria, Judges,
Commonwealth Attorney, Clerk of Court, VSB, JIRC, Courts of Justice, the Democratic party,
Supreme Court of Virginia has acted intentionally, willfully, wantonly, and maliciously in their
collusion to protect Ilona Ely Freedman Grenadier Heckman founding partner to the law firm
Grenadier, Anderson, Stracae, Duffett & Kiesler, the late wife of Judge Albert Grenadier, from
being held responsible for her and her law firms criminal activity.


A few days prior to Thanksgiving 2011 (right after receiving documents in the Mail from Judge
Clark) a Code Inspector showed up at JWG home asking how she was coming with getting the
gutter re-attached and the RV moved. JWG explained her financial difficulties and that she would
23

in the next few weeks have the RV moved and the gutter fixed. He informed her not to worry and
call him when it was completed.

JWG then learned through the Supreme Court that the City of Alexandria had not followed the
customary procedure for filing the recusal paper work, they did not handle it appropriately, with
regard to the Grand Jury

The SATURDAY after Thanksgiving JWG was charged $200 twice. JWG has learned there is a
moratorium on overtime work on a Saturday in the City of Alexandria.

Approximately a week
later JWG was fined again.


These fines came after JWG contacted the Virginia Supreme Court after being

blocked from
exercising her RIGHT to speak to the Regular Grand Jury, blocked by both the Presiding Chief
Judge Donald M. Haddock of the City of Alexandria Circuit Court, and by the City of Alexandria
Commonwealth Attorney Randy Sengel.


That the actions of Megan S. Roberts coincide with the actions of other Government employees
(Judges, Commonwealth Attorney Randy Sengel, Clerk of Court Ed Semonian, etc.) to maliciously
intimidate JWG, this is just one of the many scare tactics they are using, to try and scare JWG from
following through with suits
against other Government employees and complaints against them with other state agencies.

January 4, 2012 JWG receives a letter from Ms. Roberts threatening to sue her over the $200.00.
Plaintiff responses, with no intention of paying and why
On January 4, 2012 Randy Sengel writes a letter to Judge Bowne Potter who has been
appointed by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Virginia Cynthia Kinser to oversee that Janice
Wolk Grenadier goes before the Grand Jury. Randy Sengel writes Judge Potter that JWG is not one
of his witnesses and should not be allowed in front of the Grand Jury.
February 13, 2012 In what amounted to little more than a Kangaroo Court, proceeds to take place
at the City of Alexandria Circuit Court when the Grand Jury met, where Randy Sengel proceeds to
tell the Judge what he is allowed to do and not do. Tampering with the Grand Jury

On the morning of May 14, 2012 JWG delivers letter to Ms. Roberts she is on the list to be sued with
other Government employees and lawyers that have prevented JWG from due process her United
States Constitutional Rights, her Virginia State Constitutional and her Civil Rights.
May 14, 2012 Ms. Roberts has the Code Enforcement Lawmaster do a statement and in turn files
suit against JWG. Mailing out a letter with the suit documents saying JWG had not responded to the
$450. the City ALLEGES the JWG owed. JWG never received a letter from Ms. Roberts in regard to
the $450.00. Ms. Roberts actions in November and May are abusive and RETALIATORY
against JWG for her exposing Alexandria Corruption to Virginias Chief Justice.

JWG has filed a Counterclaim and Cross-Complaint. which was denied by Judge from Arlington
who lied in court.
24

28. George McAndrews is guilty of: Judicial Misconduct, Criminal Misconduct, Discrimination for
Religious, Social, Economic, Hierarch, Gang Type Behavior Similar to the Klue Klux Klan, Attempt to
harm Plaintiff and her Girls through Drugs & Rape, Slander of Plaintiff to prevent Due Process,
Tampering with Evidence, Mail Fraud, Violating the Law and the Rules of the Supreme courts,
Violation of the Judicial Cannons, Obstruction of Justice, Fraud on the Court, TREASON, Title 18
U.S. Code 241 & 242; Title 42 U.S. Code 1981 & 1983 and other laws

Collusion worked with Megan Roberts see #27

29. James L. Banks is guilty of: Judicial Misconduct, Criminal Misconduct, Discrimination for
Religious, Social, Economic, Hierarch, Gang Type Behavior Similar to the Klue Klux Klan, Attempt to
harm Plaintiff and her Girls through Drugs & Rape, Slander of Plaintiff to prevent Due Process,
Tampering with Evidence, Mail Fraud, Violating the Law and the Rules of the Supreme courts,
Violation of the Judicial Cannons, Obstruction of Justice, Fraud on the Court, TREASON, Title 18
U.S. Code 241 & 242; Title 42 U.S. Code 1981 & 1983 and other laws

Collusion with and worked with Megan Roberts see #27
30. Angela D. Caesar, - United States Federal Clerk of Court is guilty of: Judicial Misconduct,
Criminal Misconduct, Discrimination for Religious, Social, Economic, Hierarch, Gang Type Behavior
Similar to the Klue Klux Klan, Slander of Plaintiff to prevent Due Process, Tampering with Evidence,
Mail Fraud, Violating the Law and the Rules of the Supreme courts, Violation of the Judicial Cannons,
Obstruction of Justice, Fraud on the Court, TREASON, Title 18 U.S. Code 241 & 242; Title 42 U.S.
Code 1981 & 1983 and other laws

Collusion with Judge Howell and Judge Boasberg to return documents properly stamped into the
record.
31. Patricia L. Harrington - Clerk of Court - Supreme Court of Virginia is guilty of: Judicial
Misconduct, Criminal Misconduct, Discrimination for Religious, Social, Economic, Hierarch, Gang
Type Behavior Similar to the Klue Klux Klan, Attempt to harm Plaintiff and her Girls through Drugs &
Rape, Slander of Plaintiff to prevent Due Process, Tampering with Evidence, Mail Fraud, Violating the
Law and the Rules of the Supreme courts, Violation of the Judicial Cannons, Obstruction of Justice,
Fraud on the Court, TREASON, Title 18 U.S. Code 241 & 242; Title 42 U.S. Code 1981 & 1983 and
other laws

Collusion with the Supreme Court of Virginia, Chief Justice Cynthia Kinser in denying law used in
Order to Deny Appeal - Ignoring the Law and allowing disingenuous documents to be filed.
Signed an Order on June 24, 2014 denying Motion for Law used to be
32. Ed Semonian - Elected Clerk of Court / Elected official of the City of Alexandria is
guilty of: Judicial Misconduct, Criminal Misconduct, Discrimination for Religious, Social, Economic,
Hierarch, Gang Type Behavior Similar to the Klue Klux Klan, Attempt to harm Plaintiff and her Girls
through Drugs & Rape, Slander of Plaintiff to prevent Due Process, Tampering with Evidence, Mail
Fraud, Violating the Law and the Rules of the Supreme courts, Violation of the Judicial Cannons,
Obstruction of Justice, Fraud on the Court, TREASON, Title 18 U.S. Code 241 & 242; Title 42 U.S.
Code 1981 & 1983 Color of the law Abuses Ignoring his Oath of Office, VSB Duties of an Officer of
the Court, Bribery By appearance with Patsy Ticer fund raising donations for his Campaign to
influence his decision, Brach of Fiduciary Duties, Government Liability, Conflict of Interest, 18.2-481
Treason, Collusion / Conspiracy, Ignoring due process for JWG, Ignoring JWGs rights under the
25

Constitution of Virginia & the United States, Ignoring JWGs civil rights Virginia Code 17.1-105 (b)
18.2 21 and other laws

September of 2007 when all the Circuit Court Judge's recused themselves, because of Ilona
Greandier a lawyer/officer of the court lied in Court, it was Mr. Semonian's job to file the appropriate
paper work with the Supreme Court of Virginia
October 11, 2011 It was Mr. Semonians job to insure that JWG was permitted to go in front of the
Grand Jury. It was Mr. Semonians job to insure on October 11, 2011 that the appropriate paper work
was submitted to the Supreme Court of Virginia for a Judge to be designated by the Supreme Court
Justice Cynthia Kinser for December 12, 2012 at 9am when JWG by Chief Judge Donald M. Haddock
was demanded back to go in front of the Regular Grand Jury. The paper work was not submitted to the
Supreme Court of Virginia in a timely manner and customary appropriate channels.
January 25, 2012 It was Mr. Semonians job to insure that JWGs Motion for Sanctions against Randy
Sengel was heard on January 25, 2012 by Judge Clark who confirmed with JWG that he had not
recused himself.
It was Mr. Semonians job to answer reasonable basic questions about the Grand Jury when JWG
asked them of him. Which he refused to do.
February 8, 2012 It was Mr. Semonians job to insure JWGs Motion for Sanctions against Mr.
Semonian to be heard on February 8, 2012 was heard by Judge Clark or that Judge Clark then recused
himself. Judge Clark did not recuse himself and heard other Motions that were not on his docket on
February 8, 2012. It was Mr. Semonians job to send a deficiency notice to JWG if any fees were due
on case # MO 11001482, or to inform her when paper work was filed. It was Mr. Semonians job on
February 13, 2012 to insure JWGs file was in order - Ed Semonian did not do his job. But with the
support of The Network was reelected in November of 2011 for another 8 years.
February 13, 2012 It was Mr. Semonians job on February 13, 2012 to insure that JWG went in front of
the Regular Grand Jury.

Ed Semonian has lost his immunity. He as the Clerk of Court did not follow the law, i.e. you are a
trespasser of the law, he as a Clerk of Court. The U.S. Supreme Court, in Scheuer v. Rhodes, 416
U.S. 232, 94 S.Ct. 1683, 1687 (1974) stated that "when a state officer acts under a state law in a
manner violative of the Federal Constitution, he "comes into conflict with the superior authority of that
Constitution, and he is in that case stripped of his official or representative character and is subjected in
his person to the consequences of his individual conduct. The State has no power to impart to him any
immunity from responsibility to the supreme authority of the United States. Mr. Semonian with
Defendants acted intentionally, willfully, wantonly, and maliciously in their collusion to protect Ilona a
wife of a past judge part of the network. Mr. Semonains and Defendants blatant abusive regard to the
United States of America Constitution, Virginia Constitution, Civil Rights of Plaintiff is obvious. Mr.
Semonian had the responsibility of knowing the law, In conclusion he either did not know the
law incompetence, or, he ignored the law unconscionable!

Ed Semonian to date is ignoring the rules and the laws and allowing Judges without
J urisdiction to rule on Plaintiff


33. Randy Sengel (Ret) - Elected Commonwealth Attorney City of Alexandria is guilty of:
Judicial Misconduct, Criminal Misconduct, Discrimination for Religious, Social, Economic, Hierarch,
Gang Type Behavior Similar to the Klue Klux Klan, Attempt to harm Plaintiff and her Girls through
Drugs & Rape, Slander of Plaintiff to prevent Due Process, Tampering with Evidence, Mail Fraud,
26

Violating the Law and the Rules of the Supreme courts, Violation of the Judicial Cannons, Obstruction
of Justice, Fraud on the Court, TREASON, Title 18 U.S. Code 241 & 242; Title 42 U.S. Code 1981
& 1983 and other laws

Called / Considered himself the GOD of the Grand Jury. Made himself the Gate Keeper God to
the Grand Jury, Ignoring the Crimes of the Judges, Ignoring the Crimes of the Clerk of Court, Using
scare tactics and the police to show off his power . After Ben Dimuro put Extortion in the ear of
everyone A detective shows up and interviews JW for over an hour, it is on tape, yet there is no record
of this in the Police Department. Ignoring the crimes of Ilona Ely Freedman Grenadier Heckman of
Stealing, Lying in court, Filing false documents in the courts, involved with the stealing of over $95,000.
In the Sonia Grenadier Trust, With holding a note of JWGs, that her hate for Plaintiff and her girls is
that they are Catholic and Ilona is Jewish. Using his power to intimidate JWG a single mom with two
girls.

Randy Sengel Commonwealth Attorney supported and would not looked into illegal behavior of parties
involved. Ignored the appointment of Judges made ignoring the rules and law.

October 28, 2012 Randy has Detective Pak call me about Extortion charges in collusion with Ben DiMuro and
I the pattern of anytime Plaintiff finds the law and confronts the illegal behavior Randy Sengel finds a way to go
after Plaintiff in a Retribution / Retaliation pattern. Extortion Charges which there is no police incident number
nor any record with the Alexandria Police Records room. January 7, 2012 several e-mails and phone calls to
Detective Pak who lied on several occasions to Plaintiff and there was no number to give Plaintiff, as he
never reported his Scare Tactics to the appropriate people. He went out of his way in collusion with Randy
Sengel to harm Plaintiff

August 2, 2010 e-mail from Randy just doesnt want to investigate Ilona, it would be bad for him
September 27, 2011 Letter to Randy from Plaintiff to Convene a Special Grand Jury
September 29, 2011 Letter Randy Sengel in regard to a Special Grand Jury NO because the last thing
anyone wants to have come out is the Truth about the Corruption in the State of Virginia
October 5, 2011 Letter from Randy Receipt of Praecipe filed October 2011 to go in front of the Grand Jury
on October 11, 2011.
October 6, 2011 Letter from Plaintiff commenting on his intent to obstruct Justice
October 7, 2011 E-mail from Randy acknowledging attachments.
October 11, 2011 Order Judge Haddock, Judge Kemler, Judge Dawkins recusing themselves from Grand
Jury
October 14, 2011 Letter to Mr. Sengel regard to Plaintiffs rights being violated by denial of access to Grand
Jury
October 14, 2011 Letter Judge Haddock retires on December 31, 2011.
November 16, 2011 Letter from Circuit Court No judge available for December 12, 2011 Plaintiff learns
that is because the Clerk of Court has not filed the appropriate papers with the Supreme Court of Virginia in the
appropriate order.
November 2011, Saturday after Thanksgiving with a moratorium on City of Alexandria employees working on
Saturday Code enforcement comes out to Plaintiffs home.
November 2011 Order from Supreme Court Justice that Richard B. Potter has been appointed to act out
Kangaroo Court.
November 21, 2011 Instruction to Richard B. Potter on what his duties are to be performed on February 13,
2012.
27

January 4, 2012 Randy Sengel writes letter to Judge Richard Potter Plaintiff is not one of his witnesss and
should not be allowed in front of Grand Jury.
January 4, 2012 in collusion with Randy Sengel to try and intimidate Plaintiff he has City Attorney Megan
Roberts threaten to sue Plaintiff for $200.00.
January 18, 2012 Plaintiff files Sanctions against Randy Sengel, to be heard on January 25, 2012.
In collusion with the Circuit Court Judges, Randy Sengel & Judges decide that Judge Richard Potter will hear
Sanctions again ignoring the Rules of the Supreme Court of Virginia.
Randy Sengel has lost immunity. He has acted in an unprofessional and illegal manor. His actions have been
intentionally, willfully, wantonly, and maliciously to insure that Plaintiff did not get a fair trial. Mr. Sengels
blatant abusive regard to the United States of America Constitution, Virginia Constitution, Religious and Civil
Rights of Plaintiff,. . The acts of the Mr. Sengel are egregious and vicious actions against Plaintiff a pro se,
single mom with her 2 girls because they are Catholic and are x communicated from the Old Boy Network. Mr.
Sengel is a Elected official, lawyer and officer of the court he has abused his power, and his oath.
Randy Sengel is guilty of Fraud on the Court, malpractice, Deceit: Non- Disclosure / Concealment of his
relationships with the Judges and others, Constructive Fraud,

Statement of Facts
Plaintiff incorporates herein by reference all of the allegations contained in Introduction,
Jurisdictions and Venue, Parties 1 - 33,

34. February 14, 1986 Ilona Grenadier Heckman a lawyer started lying, manipulating and
stealing from Plaintiff;

35. Defendant Ilona Grenadier Heckman mislead and lied to the Federal Bankruptcy in
Court in Alexandria Virginia

36. September 12, 2007 Ilona a Lawyer lied in court on September 12, 2007

37. September 2007 the Circuit Court Judges of the City of Alexandria all recused
themselves not using the Law or Rules of the Virginia Code 17.1-105 (b) The Judge s
knew the law and the rules but, chose to ignore them.

38. October 17, 2007, November 15, 2007 Letters sent from Judges Chambers Diane
Fiske in regard to Judges recusing themselves and when the Motion for Default
would be heard. Shows the Collusion

39. December 27, 1990 Judge Percy Thornton Jr., Judge H. Selwyn Smith, Judge Herman A.
Whisenant Jr., Judge Frank A. Hoss, Jr., Judge William D. Hamblen, filed the following
Order to the Supreme Court of Virginia: (Plaintiff found this Order by chance on or
around April 11, 2014)
Order

Ilona Ely Grenadier , one of the Defendants in the above-styled Chancery No. 30211, is a
member of the local Bar who regularly practices law before this Court. Therefore, the Judges of
28

the Thirty-First Judicial Circuit deem it improper fo any one of them to preside in this case, and
the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court is requested to designate another circuit court judge to
preside over this case.

Entered 27
th
Day of December, 1990
Signed by: Judge Percy Thornton Jr., Judge H. Selwyn Smith, Judge
Herman A. Whisenant Jr., Judge Frank A. Hoss, Jr., Judge William D. Hamblen


40. November of 2007 Judge Hoss refused to do the favor of ruling on the case against
Ilona Grenadier as a favor for Judge Haddock. Which shows in September of 2007 when
the Slippery Slope started the Judges knew exactly what they were doing. This Order
shows that with the letters that Judge Haddock and others had the knowledge of the law
and deliberately broke the law to protect one of their own Ilona Grenadier Heckman.

41. December 2007 Judge Fortkort ruled in favor of Ilona a lawyer lying in court

42. December 2007 Plaintiff requests from Diane Fiske a Judge that is not in collusion with
Defendant Ilona and the Judges. Plaintiff is informed the complete opposite of the law,
Plaintiff is informed the only way they would request a Judge from the Supreme Court of
Virginia was if they could not find one. This is in direct conflict with the law which was
known by all Circuit Court Judges.

43. February 13, 2008, May 7, 2008 & July 9, 2008 Judge Brown three times ruled in
favor of Ilona lying in court, lying in court documents, lying in admissions, lying in
Counterclaim Cross Complaint, Denying a Jury Trial, Sending threatening and bullying
letters to Plaintiff. Ilona Grenadier Heckman bragged often of her special friendship with
Judge Brown, how he called her all the time for FREE legal advice.

44. September 11, 2008 Kangaroo Court with Judge John McGrath who ruled in favor of Ilona
Grenadier Who had agreed prior to court to do this with Judge Haddock, Kloch, Kemler,
Dawkins, Kent, Brown, Fortkort. Was bulling to Plaintiff in court.

45. October 21, 2008 Complaint sent to Donald Curry JIRC (Judicial Inquiry and Review
Commission) in regard to Judge McGraths criminal behavior on September 11, 2008.
Donald Curry had told Plaintiff not to bother with complaint as Judge McGrath was his
friend. October 23, 2008 Donald Curry sent a letter not going to investigate criminal
actions of Judge McGrath. Donald Curry was according to articles put in this position by
Judge Donald Kent. Judge Haddocks best friend. Judge Haddock on May 7, 2008 had
stated You will never get a fair trial we LOVE Ilona he then went on to choose all Judges
to hear case. Judge Donald Kent set Plaintiff up with his x-wife Martha Kent through
Senator of Virginia Patsy Ticer to make sure that Plaintiff knew You will never get a fair
trial, Me and My family cant either, You are no longer one of them Donald Curry would
go on to return or ignore complaints about Judges with a letter We cant change the
29

Outcome of Your Case so we will not investigate the actions of the Judges

46. The VSB (Virginia State Bar) July of 2008 Plaintiff filed a complaint written by a lawyer
who teaches ethics for the VSB. The complaint was ignored Plaintiff would file several
other complaints Defendant Ilona hired Ben DiMuro a past President of the VSB and all
complaints were ignored and not even acknowledges by the Virginia State Bar Edward
Davis. Ben DiMuro has left in his will when he and his wife Sandy pass 10% will be left to
the Bar.

47. October of 2009 with the collusion of Randy Sengel - Commonwealth Attorney of the City
of Alexandria, using bullying and scare tactics to get Plaintiff charged with the Extortion,
a game Ben DiMuro had come up with in April of 2009 when he was hired by Ilona
Grenadier and her law firm, to use whatever illegal and unprofessional tactics it took to
dispose of exposer of Ilonas criminal activities. The Extortion issue with Randy Sengel
bringing in the City of Alexandria Police Charles Pak to try and intimidate Plaintiff. This
was confirmed by Detective Pak. This was in collusion with letter written to frighten
Plaintiff on April 17, 2009 by lawyer Ben DiMuro threatening letter to Plaintiff that Plaintiff
was trying to Extort money from Ilona - Money that Ilona owed Plaintiff / JWG from
malicious manipulation, and stealing it from JWG.

48. December of 2010 through January 2012 VSB Ethics attorney James Michael
McCaluley contacted Plaintiff and scammed her. He met with Plaintiff in Arlington Virginia.
Asked Plaintiff to mail all her documents and information to his home. He would review it.
He Lied. He scammed Plaintiff. Never planning on reviewing documents, from his actions.

49. On October 11, 2011 Chief Judge Donald M. Haddock - informed Plaintiff first she
would be allowed in front of the Grand Jury. Chief Judge Donald M. Haddock who had
informed Plaintiff back in 2007 that Plaintiff could not get a fair trial as WE LOVE ILONA
now informs Plaintiff he was going to let her go in front of the Grand Jury but has decided
not to as he believes Plaintiff is going to talk about him. . Demanded Plaintiff back on
December 12, 2011 to go in front of the Grand Jury. This was then delayed and denied by
Corrupt Judge Richard Bowen Potter who with collusion of Commonwealth Attorney
Randy Sengel denied access to the Grand jury on February 13, 2012. September of 2011
Ilona / Grenadier et al Law Firm and Ben DiMuro / DiMuroGinsberg had made a generous
donation for his portrait. Judge Donald Haddock retired on December 31, 2011.

50. The Circuit Court of Alexandria did not file the paper work through the regular
channels of the Supreme Court of Virginia. It is believed Richard Bowen Potter was
chosen with the support of the Supreme Court of Virginia to work in collusion with the
other Defendants.

30

51. November 21, 2011 Order appointing Judge Richard Bowen Potter by The Supreme
Court Chief Justice Cynthia D. Kinser To preside over grand jury proceedings on
Monday, February 13, 2012

52. October 13, 2011 Patcy Ticer having set Plaintiff up with Martha Kent Held a fund raiser
for Ed Semonian Clerk of Court for the City of Alexandria, even with the knowledge of his
criminal behavior. Plaintiff had reached out to Senator Patsy Ticer in November of 2008.
Ilona Grenadier donated to the re-election of Ed Semonian. Senator Patsy Ticer set
Plaintiff up with Martha Kent x-wife of Judge Kent to explain to Plaintiff that you cannot get
a fair trial Just like me and my family you are no longer one of them. According to the
appearance and several people Martha Kent did not work for Patsy Ticer.

53. October 20, 2011 Plaintiff files in the eastern District Court of Virginia Verified
Complaint Conspiracy to interfere with the Civil rights 18 USC 241 & 242, USC 1983
Illegal Actions to Deny access to Grand Jury. Trial by Jury, & More Emergency Motion for
Injunctive Relief.

54. November 9, 2011 Plaintiff is Denied in forma pauperis which made suit unaffordable the
preventing access to the courts to Plaintiff ( have been granted it twice in DC ) Plaintiff
cannot get a job due to the slander of Plaintiff by Ilona Grenadier Heckman December
20, 2011 Ms. Slaughter Judge Lees secretary lies to Plaintiff

55. January 13, 2012 Order that was done and mailed on the 18
th
of January 2012. In which
Plaintiff is called Delusional, malicious & looking for frivolous law suits being
fantastic and fanciful nature. SLANDER OF PLAINTIFF - But, Judge Gerald Bruce
Lee did this as Judge Clark, Judge OBrien, Judge Howell, Judge Walton, Judge Boasberg
to discredit Plaintiff for Defendants. Judge Gerald Bruce Lee has and had a conflict of
interest in all parts of Plaintiffs case and should have recused himself. Because of this
Gerald Bruce Lee has lost judicial immunity. Conflict of interest and his being part of the
Old Boys Network can be easily proven. That several articles show his friendship and the
conflict of interest for Judge Lee to have ruled.

56. City of Alexandria in Collusion to harass Plaintiff - November of 2011 Civil Case #
12 3028 in regard to a gutter that needed re- attaching to Plaintiffs home about 1 foot of
gutter had become unattached during the Earth Quake and an RV parked in Plaintiffs
drive way (which Plaintiff by right was allowed to have in drive way). The City of
Alexandria in collusion with Randy Sengel, Megan Roberts, James L. Banks, George
McAndrews - The same day Plaintiff learned about City of Alexandria Circuit Court had
ignored the laws with the Supreme Court of Virginia for an appropriate Judge to be
appointed for Plaintiff to go in front of the Grand Jury to ask for a Special Grand Jury to
investigate the Judicial Criminal Actions of Defendants. There is no question that this was
done in direct Retaliation to Harass Plaintiff By the Circuit Court Judges and
Commonwealth Attorney Randy Sengel.
31


57. August 12, 2012 Judge Kloch appropriately recuses himself and apologizes stating
Appearance of Justice is as important as Justice itself

58. September 26, 2012 Judge Clark who by appearance had recused himself hears Motion
to reopen - Case No. CH 010654

After everyone had left the Court room Judge Clark to keep the hearing private / secret called
Grenadier v. Grenadier was heard the Sheriffs stationed outside the Court Room to make sure
that no one was aloud in to watch the proceedings.
On the Plaintiff side you had pro se Janice Wolk Grenadier
On the Defendants side you had Jon Tran for Ilona Ely Freedman Grenadier Heckman et al, and
Michael Wieser for David Grenadier.
Plaintiff started out with asking that Judge Clark recuse himself for the following reasons:
Refusing to hear 2 Motions filed by Plaintiff
The letter delivered in May that Plaintiff planed on naming him in a suit she plans to file
because by all appearance Plaintiff believe him to be in collusion with the other Circuit
Court Judges to rule in Defendants favor. Because she is part of their elite Old Boys
Network group.
Plaintiff then discussed the issue of John Tran being disingenuous and not servicing Plaintiff
properly and all the grief from the court Plaintiff received with any type of filing or service.
John Tran took stood up and lied to the Judge said he had mailed the filing to Plaintiff. Which as
red as he turned Plaintiff believes there is little truth to that.
Michael Weiser had complaints about the names on the Filing - of not his client but, John Trans
client. Ilona Ely Freedman Grenadier Heckman.
Plaintiff than told the Judge she had a notebook for him and Defendants lawyers and would like to
have them entered into the court record - Plaintiff handed the Notebook to the Sheriff who then
handed it to the Judge. The Plaintiff then handed both attorneys each a notebook with the
Exhibits. Judge Clark asked Defendants if they had any objections which both Mr. Weiser and
Mr. Tran said no. The documents then were entered into the record.
Plaintiff had planned on starting in the beginning of the Notebook and taking the Judge through
Showing how much money was owed to Plaintiff from Defendants and that Plaintiff has a
claim. A right to file the Les Pentence. But, not one Judge nor have Defendants
attorneys ever denied that Plaintiff had a claim. All Orders only deny Motions without
explanations ruling only on Favoritism.
Judge Clark made it clear he didnt care about the money he wanted to know about the
Fraud. Which Plaintiff went into, Defendant Judge Clark refused Plaintiff the right to call
her suborned witness Ilona Grenadier Heckman
32

o Plaintiff to date has never had a Judge with Jurisdiction to hear her case no Judge
has been properly appointed
o That Ilona Grenadier a lawyer when she mislead and lied to the Court on September
5, 2007 about being served all the Circuit Court Judges at the time Judge Kloch,
Judge Kemler, Judge haddock recused themselves. Not filing the appropriate paper
work with the Supreme Court of Virginia - Being disegeonus to Plaintif on several
occasions telling her the complete opposite of the rule 17.

Judge Clark instead in three motions awarded sanctions for an Affidavit that showed
more phone calls to Judges Chambers then to attorneys. Then took away Plaintiffs
right to file any other documents without Judge Clarks permission in the court on this
case. Judge Clarks actions with the knowledge of the money owed Plaintiff made
him a Trustee to Plaintiffs Claim. That Judge Clark did not have Jurisdiction all
Orders are VOID.

59. On October 11, 2012 Plaintiff went to the Clerks in the City of Alexandrias office to
confirm my file was in Order. Plaintiff found the Exhibits that the Judge had ordered into
record where not in the file. When Plaintiff questioned it Judges Chambers informed the
Clerks office after about 45 miniutes that Judge Clark was on the bench Plaintiff would
need to come back. Plaintiff went to the 4
th
floor to find that was a lie. A clerk from
Judges Chamber came down claiming she had been in court and
The Judge never had then on the bench which is unture how would the Judge have
them if they hadnt been on the bench and he hadnt received them in court?
They were never put into evidence - Judge Clark very clearly asked Defendants
lawyers if they had objections and niether attorney not defendant whom is a lawyer and
was in the court room had an issue with them being entered on the record.
Then it was I could check the transcripts and they would say that they were never
entered into the record ( which means to me the transcripts have been tampered with)
Prior to leaving the court house on September 26, 2012 Sheriff Kapetanis of the Alexandria
Sheriffs office escorted me back into the Court house where I requested the notebooks back from
Defendants lawyers if they didnt wish to have them - They both in agreement informed me they
needed them as they had been entered into the record as evidence. I walked away agreeing with
them

60. October 12, 2012 Defendants Judge Clark, Kemler and Dawkins return documents similar
to what Federal Judge Howell and Judge Boasberg has done to prevent the TRUTH of
Defendant Ilona Grenadier in Plaintiffs file.

61. On October 13, 2012 in the Mail Plaintiff received a Box which has not been opened from
the Circuit Court of Alexandria the box has been x-rayed and Contains documents
submitted to the courts on September 26, 2012


62. November / December 2012 Ilona and other Defendants has a gentleman by the
name of Mark Stuart contact Defendant - He is to harm Defendant - Drug Plaintiff and
33

get inappropriate sexual pictures of Plaintiff , Rape one of her daughters or plant
drugs on one of the girls or in Defendants home. Whatever takes to stop the TRUTH
from coming out. This is done in collusion with Ilona Grenadier Heckman, DiMuroGinsberg
Lawyers, and Circuit Court Judges. Plaintiff is warned by Mr. Stuart that the Defendants
will stop at nothing to shut Plaintiff up.

63. It is obvious Defendants are DESPERATE to keep the TRUTH and the Judicial
Misconduct from being reviled To prevent Ilona Grenadier Heckman an attorney being
held accountable for her Criminal Activity.

64. On or around July 12, 2013 The appropriate fees were paid to reopen Case No. Ch 99-
1253 in the City of Alexandria, Virginia - Plaintiffs Divorce to re-open on Fraud due to
the new information on how Real Estate was owned and that Plaintiff had a right to 24.5%
of such real estate owned by GIC. A partnership that Plaintiff had contributed financially to
over $100,000. That Defendant Ilona had a non-licensed attorney in the State of Virginia
do a document to dissolve the Partnership without Appellant/Plaintiffs signature. This
document did not hold up in the sale of 28 E. Bellefonte and all properties sold by
Defendants without Appellants signature have a cloud on the Title per Virginia Law.

65. On or around July 12, 2013 Plaintiff filed a Subpoena in the COA Clerks office w/cert of
service to Defendants in Divorce Case. On or around July 15, 2013 Yoav Katz / Katz &
Co. was properly served w/cert of service to Defendants.

66. On or around July 15, 2013 Motion was filed by Plaintiff .
Motion for the Circuit Court J udges Kemler, Dawkins and Clark to recuse themselves
following the directions of the law under Virginia Supreme Court Rule 17.105
Motion for Property Settlement Agreement in the Divorce between Plaintiff and
Defendant as Defendant has acted in a Fraudulent Manor since October of 1985
New evidence a in recent weeks supports this
Motion Demand Trial by J ury and Change of Venue

COMES NOW PLAINTIFF requests that a trial date be set with a demand for Jury for plaintiff to
present that there was no property settlement on the grounds of fraud by Defendant. With
respect to the conduct that constitutes fraud, Delaware's high court held that these showings were
required: Plaintiff will show (1) false representation, of facts, made by the defendant; (2) that
defendant's knowledge, was that the representation was false and was made with reckless
indifference to the truth; and (3) was done with purpose and an intent to induce the plaintiff to act
or refrain from acting. Schmeusser v. Schmeusser , 559 A.2d 1294 (Del. 1989). E.g., Billington v.
Billington , 220 Conn. 212, 595 A.2d 1377 (1991) Plaintiff will show that (1) false representation
was made as a statement of fact; (2) that statements was untrue and was known to be so by
Defendant; (3) that statements were made with the intent of inducing reliance); Despain v. Despain
, 855 P.2d 254 (Utah Ct. App. 1993) Plaintiff will prove (1) that a representation was made, (2)
concerning a presently existing material fact, (3) which was false, (4) which the Defendant (a)
34

knew to be false and (b) made recklessly, knowing that he had sufficient knowledge upon which to
base such representation, (5) for the purpose of inducing the Plaintiff to act upon it).

67. On or around July 16, 2013 an Affidavit of service was filed in COA w/ cert of service to
Defendants:
Attached Affidavit of Service & Threatening E-mails received J uly 16, 2013 (less than
24hours of Plaintiffs Father dying) This shows the malicious, manipulative behavior
of Defendant Ilona Grenadier, Ben DiMuro et al

68. On or around Aug 19, 2013 a Motion to Compel was filed in the COA w/cert of service to
Defendants
Motion to Compel Re: Yoav Katz The Facts in Court will show his Fraud w/ the IRS

69. On or around Aug 15, 2013 Lana Minatta files - Opposition to Motion for the
Recusal of Circuit Court J udges for Property Settlement Agreement, J ury Trial, and
Change of Venue and to So-Called Subpoena for Production of Documents (Keep
in mind up to now Plaintiff has not heard one word from David Grenadier or defendant
Lana Maniatta attorney)

70. On or around Aug 19, 2013 Plaintiff filed for Production of Documents
Request for Production of Documents and Things To David Grenadier (not a party
to this suit at this time) C/O his lawyer Defendant Lana Maniatta of record

71. On or around Aug 26, 2013 Defendant Lana files Opposition (not listed in Table of
Contents on Certified True Copy of the City of Alexandria Clerks office. Question
Due to Ex Parte Communications with Judges

72. On or around September 5, 2013 Plaintiff files:
PLAINTIFFS OPPOSITON TO DEFENDANTS MOTIONS FILED ON AUG 26, 2013.
1. DEFENDANTS OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO COMPEL
2. DEFENDANTS OBJECTIONS TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS
AND THINGS AND RESERVATION ON SANTIONS AND ATTORNEYS FEES

73. On or around September 5, 2013 Defendant Ilona Ely Freedman Grenadier
Heckman to Intervene in Plaintiffs Divorce.

74. On or around September 16, 2013 Plaintiff files PLAINTIFFS RESPONSE TO: The
Grenadier Parties request to INTERVENE to protect their interest and file this
OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS
Motion to Compel The Production of Documents filed against Katz & Co.

75. On or around October 3, 2013 Plaintiff meets with Ed Semonian and his assistant John
on why the appropriate paper work had not yet been filed with the Supreme Court of
35

Virginia. Mr. Semonian said he knew nothing about it and would look in to it. Mr.
Semonian is the Clerk of Court for the City of Alexandria. He is disingenuous and is
ignorant about the law by all appearance.

76. On or around October 3, 2013 Judge Clark ignoring the Rules and Laws of the Supreme
Court of Virginia, the United States Constitution, the basic right of Due Process signed an
Order denying all Motions. Judge Clark Issued an Order denying Plaintiff her
constitutional and legal right to reopen her divorce case on Fraud. By all appearance
after ex-parte communications, Judge Clark took away the basic liberties of
Plaintiff, due to the value of the case and his knowledge of the value of the case he
has created a Trustee type relationship with Plaintiff. Appellant will and can show in
past cases that he is prejudice against Plaintiff.. Whenever any officer of the court
commits fraud during a proceeding in the court, he/she is engaged in fraud upon the
court. In Bulloch v. United States, 763 F.2d 1115, 1121 (10th Cir. 1985),

Judge Clark with his Order shows his disrespect to pro se Plaintiff the law is clear reviewing
a pro-se pleading, it is prudent to follow the federal practice of liberally construing the allegations
set out in the pleading to determine whether the pleading asserts any valid causes of action. See,
e.g. Harrison v. U.S. Postal Services 840 F. 2d 1149, 1152 (4
th
Cir. 1988). The factual
allegations should be viewed in the light most favorable to the pleading party. Davis v. City of
Portsmouth, 579 F. Supp. 1205, 1209-10 (E.D. Va. 1983), affd, 742 F .2d 1448 (4
th
Cir. 1984)

Under Illinois and Federal law, when any officer of the court has committed fraud upon
the court, the orders and judgment of that court are void, of no legal force or effect.
Citation: 93F. 2d 313 (2d Cir. 1937) Any judgment procured by fraud is null and void. An
erroneous judgment may be attacked collaterally. Affirmed

77. On or around November 4, 2013 Plaintiff filed a Notice of Appeal and a Motion as directed
by the Appeals Court of Virginia to have the Bond Waived.

78. On or around November 5, 2013 Judge Clark ignoring the Rules and Laws of the
Supreme Court of Virginia, the United States Constitution, the basic right of Due Process
signed an Order denying all Motions.

79. On or around November 15, 2013 Plaintiff filed - RECONSIDERATION ON BOND BY A
JUDGE WITH JURISDICTION

The David Grenadier ignored with his lawyer Lana Minata all opportunities to object to the
Reopening of the Divorce, the Subpoena or to point out any deficiencies in a timely manner.
The City of Alexandrias clerks office questioned Plaintiff, reviewed all documents prior to stamping
them in, the Clerks confirmed Plaintiff had the right to file in her Divorce case. The Clerks office
after what was around hour of waiting prior to being able to file, believes the Clerks office
36

conferred with the Judges chambers. The law is very clear a pro se litigant is to be given equal
treatment if not special treatment, especially in a case where the intervening Person is a lawyer
and has the financial ability to bring in as many powerful unscrupulous lawyers to defend her
criminal actions. Judge Clarks acts are, were and still are all willful acts that were malicious,
violent, oppressive, fraudulent, wanton, or grossly reckless to intimidate and bully Plaintiff. These
actions continue in the hopes through Defendant / Ilona Grenadier and her gang their attempts to
continue to THREATEN Plaintiff Janice and her girls.

80. On December 24 of 2013 Ilona went full force in trying to stop the Truth from being
investigated. Her GANG / Klue Klux Klan sent this e-mail to Defendant - Defendant has
over 100 similar harassing e-mails.

From:LeahLax1234@aol.com Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 2:05 PM
To: jwgrenadier@gmail.com

something more scarier I contacted Ilona Ely Freedman Grenadier
Heckman your witch hunt is over

From:LeahLax1234@aol.com <LeahLax1234@aol.com> Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 10:39 AM
To: jwgrendier@gmail.com
you know what YOU DIDN"T HELP JEWS YOU ARE THE KIND THAT WOULD TURN
THEM IN BECAUSE ONE PERSON DID SOMETHING TO YOU THAT WAS JEWISH. YOU MADE
YOUR BED AND YOU LIED IN IT ! THIS FAMILY REJECTED YOU FOR NOT BEING JEWISH. YOU
STUPID GOY. YOU WERE REJECTED .. GET THAT INTO YOUR THICK SKULL. NOW YOU
ARE MAKING UP STORIES AND SPREADING LIES! BLAMING ALL JEWS LIKE
HITLER FOR NOT LIVING ON EASY STREET. WELL GET OFF YOUR ASS. GOOD
YOU LOST ALL YOUR MONEY MAKES YOU HUMBLE. AND GOOD YOU GOT A WHIPPING FROM A
JEWISH LAWYER WHO WAS SMARTER THEN YOURS. GOOD FOR HER. I WOULD HIRE HER IN A
HEART BEAT. SHE WENT AFTER A JEW HATING NAZI AND SHE WON. AND I HOPE SHE GAVE
HER GRANDSON A GOOD TALKING TO FOR MARRYING A GOY IN THE FIRST PLACE AND HE
SHOULD HAVE KEPT HIS ZIPPER UP AND NOT HAVE HAD SEX WITH A MENTALLY SICK PIECE
OF CRAP LIKE YOU.
YOU ARE THE NAZI WORSE A MUSLIN LOVING NAZI! YOU HATE
YOURSELF THAT IS WHY YOU HATE JEWS YOU ARE BLOCKED!


81. Janice / Defendant has close to 100 e-mails / Letters that are similar in threats
That Ilona or her Gang have sent to Janice / Defendant. Collusion of Ilona
Grenadier Heckmans gang like activity with Robin / Racial Grenadier, Andrea
Grenadier, Ben DiMuro DiMuro Ginsberg, Loretta Lax Miller aka Muggy Cat
aka Billy Sullivan

37

82. The threat of having thousands come to JWG home intimidate and threaten
JWG and allowed by courts and Alex Police I am not sure what Ilona has
paid them

We hope that you join us on Friday, January 10th, 2014 outside of Janice Wolk Grenadier's
house to protest her anti-American pro-Satan values. Email us at muggycatscreams@aol.com
for Janice Wolk Grenadier's address. We are expecting at least 200 people so don't forget to
bring Holy Water from your church to purify and sactify the land of the supporter of the Anti
Christ and the mother of the vessel of Satan. We will have a prayer session to pray for her lack
of soul but do not look her straight in the eyes or you will be turned to stone.

83. That Loretta Lax Miller using the name Billy Sullivan said she was going to
harm herself that Plaintiff contacted the FBI to make sure Loretta Miller would
be safe. Ilona, Loretta et al as a Thank you started a blog
jwgrenadierisalair.blogspot.com riddled with lies about Plaintiff forever harming
Plaintiff. This court Judge Walton, Judge Howell and Judge Boasberg
have empowered this HATE CRIME.

84. On March 13, 2014 to protect Plaintiffs rights to Properties that Ilona
Grenadier Heckman controls Plaintiff filed a Lis Pendens in Prince William
County. Ilona Grenadier Heckman and her lawyers Defendents Ben DiMuro
and Andrea Mosley lied in documents filed with Prince William County Court
on March 24, 2014 Case No. CL 14 - 2185

85. On April 4, 2014 Ben Dimuro mis lead and lied in Court, in court documents
with Defendant Judge OBrien to get the Lis Pendens released on Friday April
4, 2014. Due to personal relations and the established Order in 1990 Judge
OBrien who also gave Ben DiMuro $12,000 in legal fees did not have
Jurisdiction due to conflict of interest, ex parte communications, Discrimination
et al.

86. On March 13, 2014 in the City of Alexandria to protect Plaintiffs rights by
law to Properties owned in her marriage that are controlled by Defendant Ilona
Plaintiff with proper notice filed a Lis Pendens in the City of Alexandria,
Virginia.

87. On June 25, 2014 Plaintiff was served documents that Defendant Ben
DiMuro and Michael Weiser and other lawyers wanted their Legal fees they
were awarded September 26, 2014 for their ex parte communications, for lying
in documents to the Circuit Court, Bankruptcy Court, Prince William Court, the
Supreme Court of Virginia with a Judge that did not have Jurisdiction (Judge
Clark) and to have released the Lis Pendens in the City of Alexandria Virginia.

38

88. That the motion to be heard in Alexandria was to be July 9, 2014 the same
day the Press would be there covering the case regarding the Sheriff that
raped a women in jail. The Judges wanting this done in secret, moved the
date to July 23, 2014. That Plaintiff has filed that this suit was going to be filed
in the Federal Court and the Judges have all been given notice of such.

89. July 18, 2014 Ex-parte Communications by all appearance with Judge Clark and
Lawyer Ben DiMuro in regard to court on July 23, 2014 which Judge Clark has
refused to recuse himself. That Ben DiMuro in trying to confuse Case NO. CH -
10654 and Case No. Case No. CL 14 2185 PWC and Case No. CL 14002193
with Divorce Case No. 99- 1253. To mislead and lie in court and in court
documents.

90. When Judge Walton in his Memorandum of law called Plaintiffs filings
rambling he not only slandered Plaintiff but, gave the ammunition for further
Slandering of Plaintiff by the Judicial Community. The appearance was it was
deliberate. The attack on Plaintiff by Defendant Ilona Grenadier Heckman and
her Gang was obvious and ignored by him and this court.

91. Judge Beryl Howell allowed documents to be entered into the record on May 1, 2014
Slandering Plaintiff and giving the Circuit Court of Alexandria Judges what they had
asked for back in October of 2012. Information to make the Plaintiff incompetent to
file any other documents. By denying Plaintiffs defense Judge Beryl Howell
established a pattern. With the by all appearance coordinating with the Circuit Court
Judges in the City of Alexandria. Tampering with evidence that had been stamped
into the record and mailing it back to Plaintiff.

92. Judge Beryl Howell with one google shows conflict of interest with her appearance of
Religious believes, her relationship with Keller Heckman / Jerry Heckman the late
husband of Defendant Ilona Grenadier Heckman. That her intentions as the
intensions of the Virginia Judicial System is to protect one of their own.

93. Judge James Boasberg on June 26, 2014 further continued the pattern of Judicial
Corruption to protect the Judicial misconduct of the above defendants. By returning
Motion and documents stamped into the record in Plaintiffs file to further play into the
Plan that Ilona Grenadier in collusion with the other Defendants to not be held
accountable for her criminal misconduct.

94. July 18, 2014 Ex-parte Communications by all appearance with Judge Clark and
Lawyer Ben DiMure in regard to court on July 23, 2014 which Judge Clark refused to
recuse himself.

Claims
Plaintiff incorporates herein by reference all of the allegations contained in Introduction,
Jurisdictions and Venue. Parties, Statement of Facts.
39


Claim 1 - Breach of Contract Implied Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing Breach
of Contractual Duty of Good Faith and Fair Dealing, - Consumer Protection Act - Breach of
Fiduciary Duty - Unjust Enrichment/Constructive Trust

By virtue of the facts stated above, defendants have violated their contractual duty of good faith
and fair dealing. Plaintiff has paid fees to these courts or has been granted IFP and not received
Due Process.
1. The above defendants and defendants representatives breached their contractual duty of
good faith and fair dealing when Judges ruled in Favoritism and Cronyism. When
Judges did not have Jurisdiction and chose friends/other Judges who would not follow
the rules but would rules as told. When Judges Tampered with the evidence, Mail Fraud,
Obstruction of Justice

2. That the above Defendants and State of Virginia and the Federal Government Breach of
Contract includes not limited to their involvement being disingenuous in documents filed
with the courts and Orders. The documents will speak for themselves, the defendants
were aware of these breaches as lawyers and Judges.

3. Plaintiff through implied covenant of good faith and Fair Dealing continued to follow the
Rules of the Courts. The State of Virginia was paid for serves in the Court that were
denied Plaintiff because she was Catholic. The discrimination and segregation among
white exist the power Hierarchy by a member of one that is considered by others inferior
to the other. That even though Plaintiff did not pay fees in the United States District Court
of the District of Columbia Plaintiff was rightfully granted IFP statues after being denied
access to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, was still to
be treated equally as if Plaintiff had. That the United States Constitution et al calls for
Blind Justice / Equal Justice to all, not to just those with money.

4. The defendants flagrantly violated their Fiduciary responsibility to the Judicial
System and Plaintiff to deal in Good Faith while Plaintiff continued to deal in Good
Faith. The actions will be proven factually by Orders, Letters, Documents filed in the
court and other. That the constitutional Right of Due Process has been denied time and
time again to Plaintiff.

The State of Virginia and the United States District Courts had a Fiduciary Duty to insure the
rights and safety of Plaintiff in the and through the Court system. Plaintiff has been harmed
by the false statements which are considered defamatory that Plaintiff has THE
TRUTH which is an absolute defense . The First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution
was designed to protect Freedom of the press. The 1964 case New York Time Co. v.
Sullivan radically changed the nature of libel law by establishing a suit for libel you needed to
prove that the information was wholly and patently false or that it was published with
reckless disregard of whether it was false or not
40

Fairness of course requires an absence of actual bias in the trial of cases. But our
system of law has always endeavored to prevent even the probability of unfairness. In re
Murchinson, 349 U.S. 133, 136 (1955) Loving v. Virginia, 388 U.S. 1 (1967)

was
a landmark civil rights decision of the United States Supreme Court against discrimination. Which
includes being discriminated because the Judges, lawyers, elected officials and government
employees have decided you are not a part of or one of them.

The right of access to the courts is basic to our system of government, and it is well
established today that it is one of the fundamental rights protected by the Constitution. In
Chambers v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad, 207 U.S. 142, 28 S.Ct. 34, 52 L.Ed. 143 (1907), The right
to sue and defend in the courts is the alternative of force. In an organized society it is the right
conservative of all other rights, and lies at the foundation of orderly government. It is one of the
highest and most essential privileges of citizenship, and must be allowed by each state to the
citizens of all other states to the precise extent that it is allowed to its own citizens. Equality of
treatment in this respect is not left to depend upon comity between the states, but is granted and
protected by the Federal Constitution.207 U.S. at 148, 28 S.Ct. at 35 (citations omitted). It is clear
that the Court viewed the right of access to the courts as one of the privileges and immunities
accorded citizens under article 4 of the Constitution and the fourteenth amendment

Claim 2 - Violation Title 42 1983 Civil Rights Statue
Civil Rights Act of 1968 enacted 18 USC 241 & 245

Defendants used unfair/unconscionable means to try and intimated and scare Plaintiff and her
girls They have acted as the Klue Klux Klan would have in the past. Plaintiff is aware that
Plaintiff must show that Plaintiff can prove each element of alleged facts in her claims. That
to seek relief for the violation of a persons Federal and Constitution rights under Title 42 1983 it
allows Plaintiff to her rights contained in the United States Constitution as defined by Federal Law.
Plaintiff has been discriminated against for being Catholic That Civil Rights Act of 1968 enacted 18
USC 245 prevents discrimination due to Religion That this is a Hate Crime and Hate crime
laws are colorblind Fact the case which the Supreme Court upheld hate crimes of the First
amendment attach, Wisconsin v. Mitchell, 508 U.S. 476(1993) involved a white victim.

Plaintiff has been discriminated against for being black balled by the Old Boys Network / Judicial
Community due to her x-husband being the son of the late Judge Albert Grenadier whom was the
Husband to Defendant Ilona a lawyer ( also wife to Jerry Heckman Keller Heckman International
Law firm, 1
st
cousin to Judge Albert Grenadier) who has also intervened into Defendants Divorce.
That the discrimination and segregation among white exist the power Hierarchy by a
member of one that is considered by others inferior to the other.

Interference with the right of access to the courts gives rise to a claim for relief under
section 1983. Sigafus v. Brown, 416 F.2d 105 (7th Cir.1969) (destruction by jail guards of legal
papers necessary for appeal supports claim for damages under Sec. 1983); McCray v. Maryland,
456 F.2d at 6 ("Of what avail is it to the individual to arm him with a panoply of constitutional rights
41

if, when he seeks to vindicate them, the court room can be hermetically sealed against him by a
functionary who, by refusal or neglect, impedes the filing of his papers?"); Crews v. Petrosky, 509
F.Supp. at 1204 ("An allegation that a clerk of state court has negligently delayed the filing of a
petition for appeal, and that the delay has interfered with an individual's right of access to the
courts, may state a cause of action under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983.").

Failing to protect the Civil Rights of Plaintiff by ignoring Due Process, showing favoritism to the
Defendants and Defendants attorneys because of who they are part of the Old Boys Network of
Virginia or other. Loving v. Virginia, 388 U.S. 1 (1967)

was a landmark civil rights decision of
the United States Supreme Court against discrimination. Which includes being discriminated
because the Judges, lawyers, elected officials and government employees have decided you are
not a part of their race.

The Plaintiff respectfully had asked and was denied that the Court (DC Court) clarify the order that
denies the Plaintiffs Response under FRCP 60(a) (b) That the Plaintiff has a right to respond to
documents that are submitted into the record by Defendants especially when they are
disingenuous, discriminatory and add to the collusion of the Defendants and the Judicial
Community to slander Plaintiff. That this denial deprives the plaintiff of her rights, and to preserve
the obligations of The District Court for the District of Columbia under the United States
Constitution and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and all applicable statutes that apply to civil
rights of this individual Plaintiff so that this denial can be preserved for the record and appellate
review.

That these two e-mails with many others to come out at trial shows the religious HATE involved
here: That Civil Rights Act of 1968 enacted 18 USC 245 prevents discrimination due to Religion
That this is a Hate Crime and Hate crime laws are colorblind Fact the case which the Supreme
Court upheld hate crimes of the First amendment attach, Wisconsin v. Mitchell, 508 U.S.
476(1993) involved a white victim. With the involvement of Defendants Mother this e-mail was
sent:

From:LeahLax1234@aol.com
Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 2:05
PM
To: jwgrenadier@gmail.com
something more scarier I contacted Ilona Ely Freedman
Grenadier Heckman your witch hunt is over

From:LeahLax1234@aol.com <LeahLax1234@aol.com>
Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 10:39 AM
To: jwgrendier@gmail.com
you know what YOU DIDN"T HELP JEWS YOU ARE THE KIND THAT WOULD TURN
42

THEM IN BECAUSE ONE PERSON DID SOMETHING TO YOU THAT WAS JEWISH. YOU MADE
YOUR BED AND YOU LIED IN IT ! THIS FAMILY REJECTED YOU FOR NOT BEING JEWISH. YOU
STUPID GOY. YOU WERE REJECTED .. GET THAT INTO YOUR
THICK SKULL. NOW YOU ARE MAKING UP STORIES AND SPREADING
LIES! BLAMING ALL JEWS LIKE HITLER
FOR NOT LIVING ON EASY STREET. WELL GET
OFF YOUR ASS. GOOD YOU LOST ALL YOUR MONEY MAKES YOU HUMBLE. AND GOOD YOU GOT
A WHIPPING FROM A JEWISH LAWYER WHO WAS SMARTER THEN YOURS. GOOD FOR HER. I
WOULD HIRE HER IN A HEART BEAT. SHE WENT AFTER A JEW HATING NAZI AND SHE WON. AND
I HOPE SHE GAVE HER GRANDSON A GOOD TALKING TO FOR MARRYING A GOY IN THE FIRST
PLACE AND HE SHOULD HAVE KEPT HIS ZIPPER UP AND NOT HAVE HAD SEX WITH A MENTALLY
SICK PIECE OF CRAP LIKE YOU.
YOU ARE THE NAZI WORSE A MUSLIN LOVING
NAZI! YOU HATE YOURSELF THAT IS WHY YOU HATE JEWS YOU ARE BLOCKED!


Claim 3 - Common Law Fraud12 U.S.C 1972 - Constructive Fraud Fraud on the Court

On several occasions Plaintiff asked the courts to review and asked for a Special Grand Jury to
look into the allocations of misconduct. Plaintiff was to go in front of the Grand Jury with her
witnesss But, instead was kidnapped in a different Court Room and Grand Jury was dismissed
prior to her being allowed into ask for the Special Grand Jury.

The defendants were deceptive of material misrepresentations of past and existing facts and
remained silent when a duty to speak existed. The defendants actions were Arbitrary and
Capricious absence of a rational connection between the facts found and the choices made, made
choices that were not in accordance with the law.
Justice is supposed to be blind. In Bullock v. United States, 763 F.2d 1115, 1121 (10th Cir. 1985),
the court stated "Fraud upon the court is fraud which is directed to the judicial machinery itself and
is not fraud between the parties or fraudulent documents, false statements or perjury. ... It is
where the court or a member is corrupted or influenced or influence is attempted or where
the judge has not performed his judicial function --- thus where the impartial functions of the
court have been directly corrupted." But not only are trial judges required to be fair and impartial,
they must also 'satisfy the appearance of justice and this includes the Supreme Court of Virginia.
The trial judge's 'appearance,' or conduct and behavior, appearance of bias alone is grounds for
reversal even if the trial judge is, in fact, completely impartial. Whenever any officer of the court
commits fraud during a proceeding in the court, he/she is engaged in fraud upon the court. In
Bulloch v. United States, 763 F.2d 1115, 1121 (10th Cir. 1985),

Claim 4 - Negligence the negligent infliction of emotional distress; the intentional
infliction of emotional distress

43

The defendants had a legal duty to use reasonable care in statements posted on the internet
about Plaintiff, and what they wrote about Plaintiff in the Memorandum of Law. They did not do
this. They have posted several lies about Plaintiff and others. They have done this to ruin
Plaintiffs reputation and should be held financially and legally responsible for their actions. The
defendants malicious actions caused great emotional distress to Plaintiff. By the Commonwealth
Attorneys orders of the City of Alexandria police to never take a complaint from Plaintiff? Plaintiff
has been harmed by the false statements which are considered defamatory that Plaintiff has
THE TRUTH which is an absolute defense . The First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution
was designed to protect Freedom of the press. The 1964 case New York Times Co. v. Sullivan
radically changed the nature of libel law by establishing a suit for libel you needed to prove that the
information was wholly and patently false or that it was published with reckless disregard of
whether it was false or not. Plaintiff has been put into an unfair and dangerous position to protect
herself and her girls. The actions of the actors to cause this emotional distress were malicious,
violent, oppressive, fraudulent, wanton, or grossly reckless.

That Plaintiff has been forever harmed by the blog jwgrenadierisalair.blogspot.com that this court
endorsed by ignoring the request to have it removed. Plaintiff cannot get work nor can Plaintiff get
funding for her Family Friendly Product.

Claim 5 - Civil Conspiracy , Obstruction of Justice, Tampering with Evidence, Mail Fraud,
Slander and Liable 18 USC 241 & 242

If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten or intimidate any person in any State
Territory, Commonwealth, or District in the free exercise of enjoyment of ay right or privilege
secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States

The Collusion of the Defendants actions show collusion to harm Plaintiff and was done with
malicious, violent, oppressive, fraudulent, wanton, or grossly reckless intentions.
Defendants Civil Conspiracy to Commit Tortious Interference with Contractual Relations abuse of
process, intentional infliction of emotional distress, Civil conspiracy to commit injurious falsehood
with jwgrenadierisalair.blogspot.com that Plaintiff has a protected characteristic which will be
proven as to why Plaintiff was sought out by Defendant and that factor is why Plaintiff was
targeted by Defendants. Defendants were in collusion of civil conspiracy to intentionally
inflict emotional distress.

Obstruction of Justice US Code 18 U.S. Code Chapter 73 - OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE That
when United States District Court of the District of Columbia Judge Beryll A. Howell, Judge
Boasberg & Circuit Court Judge Clark stole the documents they Obstructed the Truth and evidence
to prove that Loretta Lax Miller and others had lied in documents submitted to courts and that
Ilona Grenadier Heckman had stolen the money from the Sonia Grenadier Trust and Plaintiff and
her girls.

44

It is illegal for two or more persons (ie; court officers or any defendant)to conspire for the
purpose of impeding, hindering, obstructing, or defeating in any manner, the due course of
justice in any State or Territory, with intent to deny to any citizen the equal protection of the
laws, or to injure him or his property for lawfully enforcing, or attempting to enforce, the right of any
person, or class of persons, to the equal protection of the laws... Griffin v. Breckenridge, 403 U.S.
88, 102, 91 S.Ct. 1790, 1798, 29 L.Ed.2d 338 (1971) and 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1985(2) (1976). Also See
Kush v. Rutledge, U.S. 103 S.Ct. 1483, 1485, 75 L.Ed.2d 413 (1983).

Congress requires that a federal court frame its orders so that those who must obey them will
know what the court intends to require and what it means to forbid. Id. (quoting Intl
Longshoremens Assn, 389 U.S. at 76). The Supreme Court has observed that this requirement is
especially vital in cases concerning the validity of duly enacted statutes. Id. The Judges and the
clerk and this court are circumventing the rule and law that a document is accepted for filing when
it is file stamped and docketed. As the cases in question already had a docket number and the
clerk file stamped the Plaintiffs original motions, the courts refusal to docket the Plaintiffs
pleadings is illegitimate and purposely biased. See: Ayala, 126 Ill Dec 413, 531 N.E.2d at 1043
(stating that a court clerk may refuse to accept a document unless the fee is paid, but where the
clerk has accepted the document for filing without the fee, file stamps it and assigns a docket
number, the court nevertheless acquires jurisdiction).

That several Judges and this court and the clerks refusal to docket the Plaintiffs pleadings are a
violation of the Plaintiffs Constitutional rights based on these facts. The contours of this right must
be sufficiently clear that an officer of the court would understand that what he is doing violates that
right Elder v. Holloway, 510 U.S. 510, 514, 114 S.Ct. 1019, 127 L.Ed.2d 344 (1994) (quoting
Harlow, 457 U.S. at 806, 102 S.Ct. 2727)

The Defendants have violated, 18 USC 242 Civil Rights and Deprivation of Constitution Right,
246, 231 Civil Disorder, 245, 249 Hate Crimes, 373 Conspiracy, Solicitation to commit a
crime of violence, 401 Contempt, Power of the court, 402 Contempts constituting crimes,
1001Fraud and false statements, 1021 Title and Records, 1028 Fraud and related activity in
connection with identification documents, authentication features, and information, 1349, Mail
Fraud and other Fraud Offenses, Attempt and conspiracy 1365, Malicious Mischief, Tampering
with consumer products (a) whoever, with reckless disregard for the risk that another person will be
placed in danger of death or bodily injury and under circumstances manifesting extreme
indifference to such risk tampers with any consume. 1506, Obstruction of Justice, theft or
alteration of record or process, false bail Whoever feloniously steals, takes away, alters, falsifies,
or otherwise avoids any records, writ, process or other proceeding in any court of the United States
whereby any judgment is reversed, made void, or does not take effect: or Whoever acknowledges,
or procures to be acknowledged in any such court, any recognizance, bail, or judgment, in the
name of any other person not privy or consenting the same
1512, Obstruction of Justice Tampering with a witness, victim or an informant:
1513, Obstruction of Justice Retaliating against a witness, victim or an informant
1514, Obstruction of Justice Civil action to restrain harassment of a victim or witness:
45

1519, Obstruction of Justice Destruction, alteration or falsification of records in Federal
investigation and bankruptcy, 1621, Perjury, 1622, Subornation of Perjury
1623, False declarations before grand jury or court, 1924, Unauthorized removal and retention
of classified documents or material, 1957, Racketeering - Engaging in monetary transactions in
property derived from specified unlawful activity
1959, Racketeering Violent crimes in aid of racketeering activity, 1968, Civil investigative
demand, 2071, Records and Reports Concealment removal or mutilation generally, 2076.
Whoever, being a clerk of a district court of the United States, willfully refuses or neglects to make
or forward any report, corticated, statement or document as required by law, shall be fined under
this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.

When Defendants hired or as a favor to Defendants to have Mark /
Michael Stuart to drug Plaintiff and get inappropriate pictures, or rape on of Plaintiffs daughters,
or plant drugs on one of Plaintiffs Daughters or in the home of Plaintiff and her girls in the
November / December 2012 time frame. When Defendants in collusion or ignored the threat:
Through Ilona Grenadier Heckman and her best friend Loretta Lax Miller aka
Muggy Cat aka Billy Sullivan Presidential Candidate for 2016 there blog -
jwgrenadierisalair.blogspot.com

We hope that you join us on Friday, January 10th,
2014 outside of Janice Wolk Grenadier's house to
protest her anti-American pro-Satan values. Email us
at muggycatscreams@aol.com for Janice Wolk
Grenadier's address. We are expecting at least 200
people so don't forget to bring Holy Water from your
church to purify and sactify the land of the supporter
of the Anti Christ and the mother of the vessel of
Satan. We will have a prayer session to pray for her
lack of soul but do not look her straight in the eyes or
you will be turned to stone.
JW Grenadier aka Janice Wolk Grenadier
Sunday, January 5, 2014
Janice Wolk Grenadier supports the Anti Christs Obama and Hillary Clinton
46

Not only is Janice Wolk Grenadier a traitor to the American people by being a card carrying Commie Pinko
but she is also supporting the Anti Christs Obama and Hillary Clinton. Yes we said it here, Anti Christs
meaning plural. Why is Janice doing this? Because they are not only going to let her keep her hairy vag but
they are going to give her the chance to grow a penis as well. Well penises. Yes, Janice Wolk Grenadier will
have 6 penises all over her body including one over her vagina. The other 5 will be as so: one in the palm of
each hand, one on the bootom of each foot and one right where a tramp stamp would be on her back. That
way when Janice Wolk Grenadier dies, she can go to Allah's heaven and have her 72 virgins. These 72
virgins will be a mix of males and females that she can rape with all of her penises and then the next morning
at sun up they become virgins again. We have figured it out that the fetal body of little Joshua that Janice
keeps in the basement of her home is going to be the vessel for the Dark Lord Satan himself to resurrect in a
human body to carry out the apocolypse. That way, Janie Wolk Grenadier is guaranteed her 6 penises.

Proof she supports the Anti Christ is in her letters she has posted and her other posts of Hillary's and Obama's
support defending both on everything Loretta Lax Miller fought against including the ObamaCare and
Islamic Terrorism which Obama and Hillary support. Janice is for the destruction of the Catholic Church's
values of having Nuns despense birthcontroll pills. Janice supports this by supporting Hillary Rodham
Clinton and Barack Husein Obama. Everything Obama stands for is to destroy American Family Values and
Janice has no values and worships Satan.

We at Muggy Cat take the religious stand that Janice is the Anti Christ and does not beleive in God and the
wonders God has done on this Earth. Maybe Janice should move to sin city Las Vegas and sell her soul
as well as her fugly body on the strip since she is whoring for Satan.

We hope that you join us on Friday, January 10th, 2014 outside of
Janice Wolk Grenadier's house to protest her anti-American pro-
Satan values. Email us at muggycatscreams@aol.com for Janice
Wolk Grenadier's address. We are expecting at least 200 people so
don't forget to bring Holy Water from your church to purify and
sactify the land of the supporter of the Anti Christ and the mother
of the vessel of Satan. We will have a prayer session to pray for her
lack of soul but do not look her straight in the eyes or you will be
turned to stone.

THESE ARE THE THREATS OF Loretta Lax Miller aka Leah Lax aka Muggy Cat aka Billy
Sullivan IN COLLUSION WITH THE DEFENDANTS MANY MORE CAN BE READ AND
FOUND IN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA - Civil
Action No. 14-0162 - That the Judicial Community is desperate in the cover up of the collusion to
protect Ilona Grenadier Heckman is obvious to a lay man.

U.S. Code Title 28 Part I Chapter 21 455 28 U.S. Code 455 - Disqualification of
justice, judge, or magistrate judge Obstruction of Justice US Code 18 U.S. Code Chapter 73 -
OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE That when United States District Court of the District of Columbia
47

Judge Beryll A. Howell & Circuit Court Judge Clark stole the documents they Obstructed the Truth
and evidence to prove that Loretta Lax Miller had lied in documents submitted to this court and that
Ilona Grenadier Heckman had stolen the money from the Sonia Grenadier Trust and that she owed
Plaintiff the money Plaintiff claimed. 18 U.S. Code 1506 - Theft or alteration of record or
process; false bail

Whoever feloniously steals, takes away, alters, falsifies, or otherwise avoids any record, writ,
process, or other proceeding, in any court of the United States, whereby any judgment is reversed,
made void, or does not take effect; or Whoever acknowledges, or procures to be acknowledged
in any such court, any recognizance, bail, or judgment, in the name of any other person not privy
or consenting to the same Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years,
or both (U.S. Code Title 18 Part I Chapter 73 1512 Title 18 U .S. Code 1512 - Tampering
with a witness, victim, or an informant. - U.S. Code Title 18 Part I Chapter 73 1513 - 18
U.S. Code 1513 - Retaliating against a witness, victim, or an informant - That Judge Beryl A.
Howell retaliated by her Order of May 30, 2014 denying Amended Complaint - U.S. Code Title
18 Part I Chapter 73 1514 - 18 U.S. Code 1514 - Civil action to restrain harassment of
a victim or witness - That Judge Beryl A. Howell, and others has empowered Defendant Ilona
Grenadier Heckman to further harass and Slander Plaintiff as is being done in the new Blog by
Loretta Miller as seen further down under Parties by Loretta Millers Blog LorettaMiller - U.S.
Code Title 18 Part I Chapter 73 1512 - U.S. Code 1512 - Tampering with a witness,
victim, or an informant.

Slander Deformation and Libel that when United States Judge Gerald Lee said that Plaintiffs
filings were Frivolous he was saying it was Frivolous for Plaintiff to expect a Judge that was not
tainted or that Plaintiff to expect attorneys to speak the truth That when Judge Walton said Plaintiff
was rambling and did not make sense was giving other Judges and the attorneys the ammunition
to slander Plaintiff further to try and make Plaintiff to look stupid and incompetent. Several
Slanderous and Hate Crime type Statements have been published, spoken and included in
documents submitted in the courts by Defendants and lawyers. The Collusion and the pattern
cannot be denied.

Claim 6 - The Four Basic Freedoms Guaranteed by the Bill of Rights and the United States
Constitution

Plaintiff will prove a violation of Plaintiffs Bill of Rights the Four Basic freedoms are
being Violated -
The Four Freedoms
1. Freedom of speech
2. Freedom of worship
3. Freedom from want
4. Freedom from fear

48

Plaintiff will show the actions of the Defendants were actions that were willful acts were malicious,
violent, oppressive, fraudulent, wanton, or grossly reckless. That the defendants were acting
under the color of State and Federal law. That the Constitutional Rights of due process are factual
allegations that will be proven through documents, letters, e-mails and actions of defendants.
That defends had been given notice, and this court is aware of the threats from Defendant Ilonas
attorney.

The Constitution of the United States a fundamental, guarantee that all legal proceedings will be
fair and that one will be given notice of the proceedings and an opportunity to be heard before the
government acts to take away one's life, liberty, or property. Also, a constitutional guarantee that a
law shall not be unreasonable, Arbitrary, or capricious. The constitutional guarantee of due
process of law, found in the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution, prohibits
all levels of government from arbitrarily or unfairly depriving individuals of their basic constitutional
rights to life, liberty, and property. The Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment ratified in
1791, asserts that no person shall "be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of
law." This amendment restricts the powers of the federal government and applies only to actions
by it. The Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, ratified in 1868, declares,"[N]or shall
any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law" ( 1). This
clause limits the powers of the states, rather than those of the federal government.

The right of access to the courts is contained within the Article IV Privileges and Immunities
Clause, the First Amendment, and the Due Process Clauses of the Fifth and Fourteenth
Amendments. Gregory v. Nunn, 895 F.2d 413, 415 n. 2 (7
th
Cir.1990)

Noting that its decisions have grounded the right of access to the courts in the Article IV Privileges
and Immunities Clause, the First Amendment, and the Due Process Clauses of the Fifth and
Fourteenth Amendments, see id. At 415 n. 12, 122 S.Ct. 2179, an access to court claim seeks to
eliminate systemic official action [that] frustrates a plaintiff in preparing and filing suits at the
present time. Id. At 413, 122 S.Ct. 2179.

The Supreme Court also has held that the First Amendment right to petition the government
includes the right to file other civil actions in court that have a reasonable basis in law or fact. See
McDonald v. Smith, 472 U.S. 479, 484, 105 S.Ct. 2787, 86 L.Ed.2d 384 (1985) Bill Johnsons
Rests., Inc. v. NLRB, 461 U.S. 731, 741, 103 S.Ct. 2161, 76 L.Ed.2d 277 (1983) ([T]he right of
access to the courts is an aspect of the First Amendment right to petition the Government for
redress of ances.); California Motor Transp. Co. v. Trucking Unlimited, 404 U.S. 508, 510, 92
S.Ct. 609, 30 L.Ed.2d 642 (1972) (The right of access to the courts is indeed but one aspect of the
right of petition.); see also Monsky v. Moraghan, 127 F.3d 243, 246 (2d Cir.1997) (It is well
established that all persons enjoy a constitutional right of access to the courts.)

Federal courts have long recognized that the pleadings of a pro se litigant must be construed
liberally and held to less stringent standards than formal pleadings drafted by lawyers. Erickson,
49

551 U.S. at 94 (citation omitted) If the denial of the court is due to omission or a technical mistake,
the clerk by LCvR 5.4 (g) is required to request the party re-file.

The standard for a right of access to the courts claim, whether treated under the First
Amendment as part of the right to petition the government for a redress of grievances or as a
procedural due process claim, should require that the plaintiff allege and prove that the states
judicial process does not provide fair procedures to remedy the wrong alleged. Proof of the lack of
adequate state remedies is required by Hudson v. Palmer, 468 U.S. 517, 104 S.Ct. 3194, 82
L.Ed.2d 393 (1984), and Vicory v. Walton, 721 F.2d 1062 (6
th
Cir.1983), in procedural due process
cases and should be required in judicial access cases.

Every person who, under color of any statutesubjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of
the United Statesto the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the
Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the part injured in an action of law, suit in equity, or other
proper proceeding for redress

Claim 7 - Judicial Cannons and the Rules of Professional Conduct

No man in this country is so high that he is above the law. No officer of the law may set that law at
defiance with impunity. All the officers of the government from the highest to the lowest, are
creatures of the law, and are bound to obey it. Butz v. Economou, 98 S.Ct. 2894 (1978); United
States v. Lee, 106 U.S. at 220, 1 S.Ct. at 261 (1882)

Further it is the obligation of every Judge to honor, abide by, and uphold not only the Constitution
and laws of the State, but they are bound by the laws and Constitution of the United States as
well. State courts, like federal courts, have a constitutional obligation to safeguard personal
liberties and to uphold federal law. Stone v Powell, 428 US 465, 483 n 35, 96 S. Ct 3037, 49 L
Ed. 2d 1067 (1976)

Any judge who does not comply with his oath to the Constitution of the United States, wars
against that Constitution and engages in violation of the Supreme Law of the Land. If a judge does
not fully comply with the Constitution, then his orders are void, In re Sawyer, 124 U.S. 200 (1888),
he is without jurisdiction, and he/she has engaged in an act or acts of treason.

A judge shall not allow family, social, political or other relationships to influence the
judge's judicial conduct or judgment. A judge shall not lend the prestige of judicial office
to advance the private interests of the judge or others; nor shall a judge convey or permit
others to convey the impression that they are in a special position to influence the judge.
A judge shall not testify as a character witness.
CANONS OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT

Canon1....
50

A Judge shall uphold the integrity and independence of the judiciary.
Canon 2.
A Judge shall avoid impropriety and the appearance of impropriety
in all of the Judges activities.
Canon 3 ..
A Judge shall perform the duties of judicial office impartially and diligently.

Disciplinary Responsibilities:
A judge who receives reliable information indicating a substantial likelihood that another
judge has committed a violation of the Judicial Canons should take appropriate action. A judge
having knowledge that another judge has committed a violation of these Canons that raises a
substantial question as to the other judge's fitness for office should inform the Judicial Inquiry and
Review Commission

A judge who receives reliable information indicating a substantial likelihood that a
lawyer has committed a violation of the Code of Professional Responsibility should take
appropriate action. A judge having knowledge that a lawyer has committed a violation of the Code
of Professional Responsibility that raises a substantial question as to the lawyer's honesty,
trustworthiness or fitness as a lawyer in other respects should inform the Virginia State Bar.

The legal profession is largely self-governing. Although other professions
also have been granted powers of self-government, the legal profession is unique in this
respect because of the close relationship between the profession and the processes of
government and law enforcement. This connection is manifested in the fact that ultimate
authority over the legal profession is vested largely in the courts.

You cant change the Truth - The Truth is the actions of the Judges, Under Illinois and Federal
law, when any officer of the court has committed fraud upon the court, the orders and judgment
of that court are void, of no legal force or effect. Citation: 93F. 2d 313 (2d Cir. 1937) Any
judgment procured by fraud is null and void. An erroneous judgment may be attacked
collaterally. Affirmed

THIS IS NOT A DOMESTIC ISSUE THIS IS AN AMERICAN ISSUE FAIRNESS IN THE COURTS
That Plaintiff has followed the Law, followed the Rules to be Discriminated by all Defendants. The
Judicial system has an incestuous relationship that has created a privileged class, a violation of
Blind / Equal Justice for all.

Conclusion
Plaintiff incorporates herein by reference all of the allegations contained in
Introduction, Jurisdictions and Venue. Parties, Statement of Facts and Claims

Wherefore this court should be aware Plaintiff takes very serious all allocations.
That Plaintiff has only included Defendants who have gone out of their way to harm Plaintiff,
51

putting it in writing where Plaintiff can easily show documents that show the intensions of the
Defendant was disingenuous, that with legal knowledge of the corruption of the Judicial system
believed they could get away with the criminal behavior doing a favor for one of their own. That
each Defendant has signed and filed with the courts documents that are disingenuous with the
criminal intent to harm Plaintiff.

Wherefore Plaintiff has been manipulated by Defendant Ilona Grenadier
Heckman with lies since February 14, 1986. The Defendants have been enriched in various
ways from there close ties to Defendant Ilona Grenadier Heckman. That in or around 2000
Ilona Grenadier manipulated Plaintiffs divorce and rights to properties, the Federal
Bankruptcy Courts and lawyers. Starting September of 2007 Defendant Ilona Grenadier
Heckman started acting in Gang like behavior with the help of the other Defendants. That
the discrimination and Hate type crimes that the Defendants have all participated in being
Judges, Lawyers, and Elected Officials whom should have used professional judgment
based on knowledge of the law to recuse themselves of such behavior. The Defendants
should be held to a higher standard, that actions are reprehensible and criminal. The
protected Privilege and Immunity is lost when the Defendants did not have Jurisdiction due
to Fraud, Discrimination where one favors one citizen over another, an egregious form of
Judicial Discrimination. That the fundamental right to a fair trial is what we send our your
men and women into war for. That the Liberties we Brag to other countries about, the above
defendants have made a Mockery of, and is an embarrassment to this great country. That
this court to uphold the integrity of the United States Judicial System, the United States
Constitution and the Laws and the Rules of the Supreme Court must act swiftly and harshly
with the above Defendants, a strong message must be sent to the Judicial community as
was sent in the 6 cases of criminal behavior of Judges attached in Exhibit 1. The courts
should award the Plaintiff the following:

1. A Special Grand Jury is immediately enacted to investigate the Criminal Actions of
Defendants.
2. That a Restraining order is immediately issued for the protection of Plaintiff and her
daughters against Defendant Ilona Grenadier Heckman who has targeted and used
retaliation with her gang like behavior with the assistance of Defendants to prevent
52

being held accountable for her Criminal Actions. Including Defendants actions and
collusion of Hacking into Plaintiffs computers, phones and other electronics.
3. Issue injunctive relief commanding a further, detailed forensic investigation into the
collusion, or racketeering of the named Defendants above, building on FBI files and
investigation of convicted Bar member Jim Arthur, Trustee to the Sonia Grenadier
Trust, and Ilona Grenadier Heckman and her law firm.
4. Defendant Ilona Grenadier be forced to remove her Blog on Plaintiff that is
disingenuous about Plaintiff - jwgrenadierisalair.blogspot.com
5. That Plaintiff and her girls receive $3, million dollars for each year of the Collusion of
the Defendants actions which show a conspiracy to harm Plaintiff and her girls,
which was done with malicious, violent, oppressive, fraudulent, wanton, or
grossly reckless intentions. Defendants Civil Conspiracy to Commit Tortious
Interference with Contractual Relations abuse of process, intentional infliction of
emotional distress, Civil conspiracy to commit injurious falsehood with
jwgrenadierisalair.blogspot.com
6. That Plaintiff be made whole for the Real Estate ownership and other actions
Defendant Ilona Grenadier Heckman has stolen from Plaintiff, that the other
Defendants with their actions prevented Plaintiff from collecting such monies and real
estate.
7. Issue declaratory relief as this Court deems appropriate and just
8. Issue other relief as this Court deems appropriate and just.
9. Award plaintiff her costs of litigation.

July 22, 2014 Respectfully Submitted,
Janice Wolk Grenadier
15 W Spring Street
Alexandria, VA 22301
202-368-7178
jwgrenadier@gmail.com