You are on page 1of 3

8/6/2014 Shale gas: Heriot-Watt University Library Resources 1/3

Shale gas. Encyclopdia Britannica, April, 2014
Research Starters
Shale gas
Shale gas: natural gas obtained from sheetlike formations of shale, frequently at depths exceeding 1,500 metres (5,000 feet). Shales are
fine-grained sedimentary rocks consisting of silt- and clay-sized particles that were laid down hundreds of millions of years ago as
organic-rich mud at the bottom of ancient seas and tidal flats. Over time the mud layers were buried by further sedimentation, and the
resulting heat and pressure transformed the mud into shale and the organic matter into natural gas. Over long stretches of geologic
time, gas that was generated in the shales migrated into more-permeable rock layers, forming todays so-called conventional reservoirs
gas deposits that are easily tapped through conventional drilling. However, much gas is still contained in the shale source rocks. The
problem for producers is that it diffuses at an extremely slow rate and must be extracted through unconventional means. The most
productive method is usually horizontal drilling through the shale seam, followed by hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, of the rock by the
injecting of fluid at extremely high pressure.
Shale gas resources of the United States
Horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing of shale gas formations began to be applied to great effect in the United States during the
1990s. Since then these methods have radically changed the natural gas market in that country. According to the Energy Information
Administration (EIA), a statistical service of the U.S. Department of Energy, shale gas, which had accounted for a minuscule amount of
U.S. natural gas production in 2000, climbed to almost one-quarter of the total by 2010. By 2035, the EIA predicted, shale gas will
account for almost half of U.S. gas production.
Such figures have prompted the American natural gas industry to proclaim that the country has been swept by a shale gale, a wave of
accessible cheap fuel that will help the United States to meet its energy needs through the 21st century without having to rely on foreign
sources. In addition, natural gas is promoted as a bridge fuel, a clean-burning fossil fuel that will enable society to lower its emissions
of greenhouse gases in the short term while proceeding with the development of renewable energies in the long term.
Some of the most actively worked shale basins in the United States are located in southern regions that have long been oil and gas
producers. These include the Barnett Shale, around DallasFort Worth, Texas; the Fayetteville Shale, mainly in northern Arkansas; the
Woodford Shale, mainly in Oklahoma; and the Haynesville Shale, straddling the Texas-Louisiana state line. The Barnett Shale was the
proving ground of horizontal drilling and fracking starting in the 1990s; more than 10,000 wells have been drilled in that basin. Other shale
basins are found in some Rocky Mountains and Great Plains states and in the Midwestern states of Illinois and Michigan, among others.
The largest basin in the United States is the Marcellus Shale, lying under most of Pennsylvania but also extending northeast into New
York and southwest into Ohio and West Virginia. According to industry officials and geologists, the Marcellus has reserves so rich that it
promises to turn Pennsylvania and its neighbouring states into the Saudi Arabia of natural gas. Estimates of recoverable reserves in
the Marcellus vary from less than 3 trillion cubic metres (100 trillion cubic feet) to more than 14 trillion cubic metres (500 trillion cubic
feet). However, even the lowest of these estimates is many times higher than the estimates current in the early 2000s, when shale gas
developers, some with experience from mature shale gas basins in the South, began to acquire permits to drill there. According to the
Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection, the number of new wells drilled into the Marcellus Shale in that state rose from
27 in 2007 to 1,445 in 2010.
Shale gas resources around the world
Many natural gas industry officials and outside observers have suggested that shale gas might be a game changer in the global
economy, altering the traditional division of the world between energy-rich supplier countries and energy-poor consumer countries. In an
Listen American Accent
Heriot Watt University
8/6/2014 Shale gas: Heriot-Watt University Library Resources 2/3
assessment of 14 shale gas-bearing regions outside the United States, the EIA has estimated that the shale gas resources of those
regions (comprising 32 countries) plus the shale gas resources of the United States have increased the worlds technically recoverable
gas resources by more than 40 percent. Many of these newly assessed resources are said to exist in countries that have not been
major producers of conventional natural gas, raising the attractive possibility that some countries may be able to pursue economic
growth while also reducing their dependence on foreign energy sources. For example, Chinas technically recoverable shale gas
resources were estimated in the EIA study to amount to some 36 trillion cubic metres (about 1,300 trillion cubic feet), half again as much
as those of the United States. With a distribution infrastructure already in place for its traditional gas industry, China is capable of
becoming a major shale gas producer.
Critics and skeptics
Not everybody agrees that shale gas is a guarantor of economic prosperity or energy independence. Canadian geologist J. David
Hughes of the Post Carbon Institute in Santa Rosa, California, argued that shale gas wells are notoriously short-lived, declining in gas
production by as much as 85 percent in their first yeartwice as fast as conventional wells. Because of the unyielding nature of the
dense source rock, Hughes noted, shale gas wells routinely have to be refractured, and in the future shale deposits will have to be drilled
and fractured in increasing numbers simply to maintain current production levels.
Other geologists and business analysts have expressed uncertainty over the supposed vastness of recoverable shale gas resources.
An example of this uncertainty can be seen in conflicting figures released by government services such as the EIA. According a report
released by the EIA in 2011, improved drilling and fracturing technologies had doubled estimates of the United States unproven
technically recoverable shale gas resources over previous estimates of resources. Of the approximately 72 trillion cubic metres (2,543
trillion cubic feet) of gas resources in the United States, shale gas was estimated to account for 23 trillion cubic metres (827 trillion cubic
feet), more than 30 percent of the countrys domestic natural gas resource base. Yet in a report released the following year, the EIA
lowered its estimate of unproven technically recoverable shale gas reserves by some 40 percent, to 13 trillion cubic metres (482 trillion
cubic feet).
Geologists tend to favour more modest resource estimates, frequently stressing the relative inaccessibility and density of the shale
formations. Industry officials, on the other hand, tend to cite larger resource statistics, pointing out that improvements in technology
make more gas reserves recoverable over time. Industry critics, meanwhile, note that shale developers have an interest in exaggerating
reserve claims in order to increase the value of their companies in the eyes of investors. It has by no means been proved, critics insist,
that shale companies actually can recover all the gas that they have claimed is recoverable or that shale deposits will provide a bridge
fuel into the 22nd century.
Both Hughes and American biologist Robert Howarth of Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, dismiss claims that shale gas is green.
They argue that, after accounting for all the energy consumed and all the pollutants emitted during all the steps from exploration to
combustion, drilling and fracking actually produce a fuel that is no greener than coal or oil. Such arguments were well received in
western Europe, where governments of various political stripes expressed commitment to the European Unions goal of drastically
reducing carbon emissions. France, for instance, has some of the largest shale gas resources in Europemainly in the picturesque
southeast part of the country and in the densely populated north around Paris. Yet test drilling of those reserves provoked such a strong
reaction by environmentalist groups that the government was prompted to put the issue to a vote in parliament. In June 2011 France
became the first country in the world to ban the exploration and extraction of gas and oil by hydraulic fracturing.
In the United States, on the other hand, the safe exploitation of domestic reserves of shale gas has been seen as making a large
contribution to a secure energy future. In response to concerns over the effects on the environment of drilling and fracturing for shale
gas, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency embarked on a study of drinking-water resources, public health, and possible
environmental impacts in the vicinity of seven specific shale gas production sites around the United States. A final report is to be
submitted by 2014.
Copyright 1994-2014 Encyclopdia Britannica, Inc.
Copyright of Encyclopdia Britannica is the property of Encyclopdia Britannica, Inc.. The copyright in an individual article may be
maintained by the author in certain cases. Content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the
copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. Source:
Encyclopdia Britannica, April, 2014
Item: 87324095
Mobile Site iPhone and Android apps EBSCO Support Site Privacy Policy Terms of Use Copyright Contact Us
powered by EBSCOhost
8/6/2014 Shale gas: Heriot-Watt University Library Resources 3/3
2014 EBSCO Industries, Inc. All rights reserved.