1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA 1. NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF FORENSIC ) COUNSELORS, INC., a Nevada Non-Profit ) Corporation; et al. ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Case No.: 6:14-cv-00187-RAW ) 1. NARCONON INTERNATIONAL, a California ) Non-Profit Corporation; et al. ) ) Defendants. )
ANSWER AND COUNTERCLAIM OF KENT MCGREGOR
The Defendant, Kent McGregor (“MCGREGOR”) hereby answers the Complaint
of Plaintiffs, National Assoc
iation of Forensic Counselors, Inc. (hereinafter “NAFC”) and
American Academy of Certified Forensic Counselors, Inc. d/b/a American College of
Certified Forensic Counselors (hereinafter “ACCFC”), and counterclaims against NAFC
and ACCFC.
ANSWER
COMES NOW MCGREGOR and for his Answer to the Complaint of NAFC and ACCFC, does generally and specifically deny each and every allegation contained in the Plaintiffs' Complaint except those admitted below:
PARTIES JURISDICTION AND VENUE
1. MCGREGOR is without sufficient knowledge to admit or deny the
allegations contained in paragraph 1 of Plaintiffs’ Complaint.
6:14-cv-00187-RAW Document 290 Filed in ED/OK on 08/01/14 Page 1 of 68
2 2. MCGREGOR is without sufficient knowledge to admit or deny the
allegations contained in paragraph 2 of Plaintiffs’ Complaint.
3. The allegations containe
d in paragraph 3 of Plaintiffs’ Complaint are
unrelated to and require no answer from MCGREGOR. To the extent that an answer is required, MCGREGOR is without sufficient knowledge to admit or deny those allegations and therefore denies them. 4. The alle
gations contained in paragraph 5 of Plaintiffs’ Complaint are
unrelated to and require no answer from MCGREGOR. To the extent that an answer is required, MCGREGOR is without sufficient knowledge to admit or deny those allegations and therefore denies them. 5.
The allegations contained in paragraph 5 of Plaintiffs’ Complaint are
unrelated to and require no answer from MCGREGOR. To the extent that an answer is required, MCGREGOR is without sufficient knowledge to admit or deny those allegations and therefore denies them. 6. MCGREGOR admits the allegations contained in paragraph 6 of
Plaintiffs’ Complaint.
7.
The allegations contained in paragraph 7 of Plaintiffs’ Complaint are
unrelated to and require no answer from MCGREGOR. To the extent that an answer is required, MCGREGOR is without sufficient knowledge to admit or deny those allegations and therefore denies them.
6:14-cv-00187-RAW Document 290 Filed in ED/OK on 08/01/14 Page 2 of 68
3 8.
The allegations contained in paragraph 8 of Plaintiffs’ Complaint are
unrelated to and require no answer from MCGREGOR. To the extent that an answer is required, MCGREGOR is without sufficient knowledge to admit or deny those allegations and therefore denies them. 9.
The allegations contained in paragraph 9 of Plaintiffs’ Complaint are
unrelated to and require no answer from MCGREGOR. To the extent that an answer is required, MCGREGOR is without sufficient knowledge to admit or deny those allegations and therefore denies them. 10.
The allegations contained in paragraph 10 of Plaintiffs’ Complaint are
unrelated to and require no answer from MCGREGOR. To the extent that an answer is required, MCGREGOR is without sufficient knowledge to admit or deny those allegations and therefore denies them. 11.
The allegations contained in paragraph 11 of Plaintiffs’ Complaint are
unrelated to and require no answer from MCGREGOR. To the extent that an answer is required, MCGREGOR is without sufficient knowledge to admit or deny those allegations and therefore denies them. 12.
The allegations contained in paragraph 12 of Plaintiffs’ C
omplaint are unrelated to and require no answer from MCGREGOR. To the extent that an answer is required, MCGREGOR is without sufficient knowledge to admit or deny those allegations and therefore denies them. 13. The allegations contained in paragraph 1
3 of Plaintiffs’ Complaint are
unrelated to and require no answer from MCGREGOR. To the extent that an answer is
6:14-cv-00187-RAW Document 290 Filed in ED/OK on 08/01/14 Page 3 of 68
