You are on page 1of 6
Home About UD Full Texts Legal English Law Student Blog Forum Quizzes and Exams LAW
Quizzes and Exams LAW MEMES 2013 BAR EXAM RESULTS ► Election Results ► VS Jose ►
Quizzes and Exams LAW MEMES 2013 BAR EXAM RESULTS ► Election Results ► VS Jose ►
► Comelec
► Comelec
Search
Search
Results ► VS Jose ► Comelec ► GR VS Search Home » Constitutional Law » Jocelyn

Home » Constitutional Law » Jocelyn Limkaichong vs COMELEC

Jocelyn Limkaichong vs COMELEC

SPONSORED ADS

0 0 0 3 0 0 0
0
0
0
3
0
0
0

Political Law – Jurisdiction of the Electoral Tribunals

Limkaichong ran as a representative in the 1 st District of Negros Oriental. Paras, her rival, and some other concerned citizens filed disqualification cases against Limkaichong. Limkaichong is allegedly not a natural born citizen of the Philippines because when she was born her father was still a Chinese and that her mom, though Filipino lost her citizenship by virtue of her marriage to Limkaichong’s dad. During

the pendency of the case against Limkaichong before the COMELEC, Election day came and votes were cast. Results came in and Limkaichong won over her rival Paras. COMELEC after due hearing declared

Limkaichong as disqualified. About 2 days after the counting of votes, COMELEC declared Limkaichong as a disqualified candidate. On the following days however, notwithstanding their proclamation disqualifying Limkaichong, the COMELEC issued a proclamation announcing Limkaichong as the winner of the recently conducted elections. This is in compliance with Resolution No. 8062 adopting the policy-guidelines of not suspending the proclamation of winning candidates with pending disqualification cases which shall be without prejudice to the continuation of the hearing and resolution of the involved cases. Paras countered the proclamation and she filed a petition before the COMELEC. Limkaichong asailed Paras’ petitioned arguing that since she is now the proclaimed winner,

the COMELEC can no longer exercise jurisdiction over the matter. It should be the HRET which should exercise jurisdiction from then on. COMELEC agreed with Limkaichong.

ISSUE: Whether or not the proclamation done by the COMELEC is valid. Whether or not COMELEC should still exercise jurisdiction over the matter.

HELD: The proclamation of Limkaichong was valid. The COMELEC Second Division rendered its Joint Resolution dated May 17, 2007. On May 20, 2007, Limkaichong timely filed with the COMELEC En Banc her motion for reconsideration as well as for the lifting of the incorporated directive suspending her proclamation. The filing of the motion for reconsideration effectively suspended the execution of the May 17, 2007 Joint Resolution. Since the execution of the May 17, 2007 Joint Resolution was suspended, there was no impediment to the valid proclamation of Limkaichong as the winner. Section 2, Rule 19 of the COMELEC Rules of Procedure provides:

“ Sec. 2. Period for Filing Motions for Reconsideration. – A motion to reconsider a decision,

Sec. 2. Period for Filing Motions for Reconsideration. – A motion to reconsider a decision, resolution, order or ruling of a Division shall be filed within five (5) days from the promulgation thereof. Such motion, if not pro forma, suspends the execution for implementation of the decision, resolution, order and ruling.

The HRET must exercise jurisdiction after Limkaichong’s proclamation. The SC has invariably held that once a winning candidate has been proclaimed, taken his oath, and assumed office as a Member of the

HOR, the COMELEC’s jurisdiction over election contests relating to his election, returns, and qualifications ends, and the HRET’s own jurisdiction begins. It follows then that the proclamation of a winning candidate divests the COMELEC of its jurisdiction over matters pending before it at the time of the proclamation. The party questioning his qualification should now present his case in a

proper proceeding before the HRET, the constitutionally mandated tribunal to hear and decide a case involving a Member of the House of Representatives with respect to the latter’s election, returns and qualifications. The use of the word “sole” in Section 17, Article VI of the Constitution and in Section 250 of the OEC underscores the exclusivity of the Electoral Tribunals’ jurisdiction over election contests relating to its members.

SPONSORED ADS

Related Cases/Legal Resources

Related Cases/Legal Resources Lazatin vs Firdausi Abbas et al Lorenzo Tañada vs Raul Daza vs Luis
Related Cases/Legal Resources Lazatin vs Firdausi Abbas et al Lorenzo Tañada vs Raul Daza vs Luis
Related Cases/Legal Resources Lazatin vs Firdausi Abbas et al Lorenzo Tañada vs Raul Daza vs Luis
Related Cases/Legal Resources Lazatin vs Firdausi Abbas et al Lorenzo Tañada vs Raul Daza vs Luis
Related Cases/Legal Resources Lazatin vs Firdausi Abbas et al Lorenzo Tañada vs Raul Daza vs Luis
Related Cases/Legal Resources Lazatin vs Firdausi Abbas et al Lorenzo Tañada vs Raul Daza vs Luis
Cuenco Singson vs Neptali Gonzales CUENCO DAZA vs SINGSON Add a comment Also post on Facebook
Singson vs Neptali Gonzales CUENCO DAZA vs SINGSON Add a comment Also post on Facebook Posting

Add a comment

vs Neptali Gonzales CUENCO DAZA vs SINGSON Add a comment Also post on Facebook Posting as

Also post on Facebook

Posting as Josine Protasio (Change)

Comment
Comment
on Facebook Posting as Josine Protasio (Change) Comment Facebook social plugin Leave a Reply Your email

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Name *

Email *

Website

Comment

are marked * Name * Email * Website Comment You may use these HTML tags and

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Submit Comment Notify me of follow-up comments by email. Notify me of new posts by

Submit Comment

Submit Comment Notify me of follow-up comments by email. Notify me of new posts by email.

Notify me of follow-up comments by email.Submit Comment Notify me of new posts by email. Find Uber Digests on Facebook! UberDigests Like

Notify me of new posts by email.Submit Comment Notify me of follow-up comments by email. Find Uber Digests on Facebook! UberDigests Like

Find Uber Digests on Facebook!

UberDigests Like Like 4,036 people like UberDigests . Facebook social plugin
UberDigests Like Like 4,036 people like UberDigests . Facebook social plugin

LikeLike

4,036 people like UberDigests.

UberDigests Like Like 4,036 people like UberDigests . Facebook social plugin
UberDigests Like Like 4,036 people like UberDigests . Facebook social plugin
UberDigests Like Like 4,036 people like UberDigests . Facebook social plugin
UberDigests Like Like 4,036 people like UberDigests . Facebook social plugin
UberDigests Like Like 4,036 people like UberDigests . Facebook social plugin
UberDigests Like Like 4,036 people like UberDigests . Facebook social plugin
UberDigests Like Like 4,036 people like UberDigests . Facebook social plugin
UberDigests Like Like 4,036 people like UberDigests . Facebook social plugin
UberDigests Like Like 4,036 people like UberDigests . Facebook social plugin
UberDigests Like Like 4,036 people like UberDigests . Facebook social plugin
UberDigests Like Like 4,036 people like UberDigests . Facebook social plugin

Inside Uber Digests

UberDigests Like Like 4,036 people like UberDigests . Facebook social plugin Inside Uber Digests Sponsored Ads
UberDigests Like Like 4,036 people like UberDigests . Facebook social plugin Inside Uber Digests Sponsored Ads

Sponsored Ads

UberDigests Like Like 4,036 people like UberDigests . Facebook social plugin Inside Uber Digests Sponsored Ads
UberDigests Like Like 4,036 people like UberDigests . Facebook social plugin Inside Uber Digests Sponsored Ads
UberDigests Like Like 4,036 people like UberDigests . Facebook social plugin Inside Uber Digests Sponsored Ads
UberDigests Like Like 4,036 people like UberDigests . Facebook social plugin Inside Uber Digests Sponsored Ads

MCQ Online Quizzes