Consultation Process on Monitoring of International Trade in Ornamental Fish


Prepared for

European Commission Directorate General E - Environment ENV.E.2. – Development and Environment by

United Nations Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre

The UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre is the biodiversity assessment and policy implementation arm of the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), the world’s foremost intergovernmental environmental organisation. UNEP-WCMC aims to help decision-makers recognize the value of biodiversity to people everywhere, and to apply this knowledge to all that they do. The Centre’s challenge is to transform complex data into policy-relevant information, to build tools and systems for analysis and integration, and to support the needs of nations and the international community as they engage in joint programmes of action. UNEP-WCMC provides objective, scientifically rigorous products and services that include ecosystem assessments, support for implementation of environmental agreements, regional and global biodiversity information, research on threats and impacts, and development of future scenarios for the living world. The Marine Aquarium Council (MAC) drafted the section on MAC certification. The IUCN Freshwater Biodiversity Assessment Unit undertook the analysis and drafted some of the section on African species threatened by trade. Both organisations provided a review and general input to the document.

Prepared for European Commission Directorate General E – Environment ENV.E.2. – Development and Environment by The United Nations Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre 219 Huntingdon Road, Cambridge CB3 0DL, UK Tel: +44 (0) 1223 277314 Fax: +44 (0) 1223277136 Website:

© Copyright: European Commission, 2008

The contents of this report do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of UNEP or contributory organisations. The designations employed and the presentations do not imply the expressions of any opinion whatsoever on the part of UNEP, the European Commission or contributory organisations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or its authority, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries.


1.  THE GLOBAL TRADE IN AQUATIC ORNAMENTALS ....................................................................1  1.1.  1.2.  2.  INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................1   TRADE DATA................................................................................................................................2 

MARINE ORNAMENTALS .........................................................................................................2  2.1.  TROPICAL COASTAL ECOSYSTEMS ....................................................................................................2   2.2.  THE TRADE IN MARINE ORNAMENTALS ..............................................................................................2   2.2.1.  Species in trade ..............................................................................................................4   2.2.2.  Common practices and techniques................................................................................4   2.2.3.  Mortality.........................................................................................................................5   2.2.4.  Vulnerability to exploitation...........................................................................................5   2.3.  SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC CONSIDERATIONS .........................................................................................8   2.3.1.  Organization of the trade ...............................................................................................8   2.3.2.  People & livelihoods.......................................................................................................9   2.3.3.  Issues affecting long‐term sustainability......................................................................10  2.3.4.  Awareness raising.........................................................................................................10   2.3.5.  Education and Research ...............................................................................................11   2.3.6.  Marine Aquaculture .....................................................................................................11  


FRESHWATER ORNAMENTALS ...............................................................................................13  3.1.  FRESHWATER ECOSYSTEMS...........................................................................................................13   3.1.1.  Values & services..........................................................................................................14   3.1.2.  The Regions ..................................................................................................................14   3.2.  THE TRADE IN FRESHWATER ORNAMENTALS .....................................................................................15  3.2.1.  Species in trade ............................................................................................................15   3.2.2.  Common practices & techniques .................................................................................19  3.2.3.  Mortality.......................................................................................................................19   3.2.4.  Vulnerability to exploitation.........................................................................................19   3.2.5.  Invasive species ............................................................................................................21   3.2.6.  Disease .........................................................................................................................21   3.3.  SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC CONSIDERATIONS .......................................................................................22   3.3.1.  People & livelihoods.....................................................................................................22   3.3.2.  Fair trade ......................................................................................................................22   3.3.3.  Freshwater aquaculture ...............................................................................................22   3.3.4.  Sustainable use initiatives ............................................................................................24   3.3.5.  Awareness raising.........................................................................................................25  


LITERATURE ..........................................................................................................................26 



Ornamental aquarium species supply a multi-million dollar industry involving the farming or harvest, sale and use of live marine and freshwater animals for display in aquaria, garden ponds and lakes. This report considers the trade in fish, although plants and invertebrates are also involved. The aquarium trade is a global industry of significant economic importance. The World Customs Organisation Market access map 1 indicates that global exports of ornamental fish in 2005 were valued at US$237,636,000 and that global imports were worth US$282,549,000. Estimates suggest that, in terms of value, the majority (at least 90%) of the trade in ornamental species comprises freshwater species (Basleer, 1994 cited by Gerstner et al., 2006; Olivier, 2001; Henley, 1984 cited by Andrews, 1990). Aquarium keeping has become increasingly popular in industrialized countries and has been rated as the second most popular hobby and the most popular type of pet (Olivier, 2001). The National Pet Owners Survey 2007-2008 revealed that 142 million freshwater and 9.6 million saltwater fish were kept as pets in the US (APPMA, 2008). Although freshwater species have dominated the ornamental trade in terms of value and volume, from the end of the 20th century the trade in marine tropical species and live coral reef appears to show a growing trend, and prices have become increasingly affordable for European and American markets (Andrews, 1990; Olivier, 2001). Most marine ornamental fish are harvested from the wild, with only 1-10% of species in trade estimated to be captive-bred (Wabnitz et al., 2003). By contrast, approximately 90% of freshwater ornamental fish were reported to be captive-bred (Andrews, 1990; Olivier, 2001; Tlusty, 2002). Junk (1984b) noted that many ornamental fish are bred in high numbers in South East Asia, Europe and the US. However, although the majority of freshwater fish in the trade were captive-bred, significant numbers were also removed from the wild (Andrews, 1990). Several authors noted that virtually all of the trade from South America involves wild specimens (Crampton, 1999b; Junk, 1984b; Olivier, 2001), as cultivation in this region was considered uneconomical (Crampton, 1999b; Junk, 1984b). Gerstner et al. (2006) suggested that the number of wild-caught freshwater fish in the trade far exceeds the number of wild-caught marine fish. Issues related to sustainability and methods for monitoring the trade have been addressed through the FAO Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries (Bartley, 2000), the Convention on Biological Diversity and the Convention on Trade in Endangered Species. In the marine sector, growing consumer concern for
1 1

environmental issues and sourcing resulted in several ecological labeling schemes for fish and corals and the establishment of the Marine Aquarium Council (MAC) (Olivier, 2001). No equivalent body has been established in the freshwater sector.



Trade data on aquatic ornamentals at the global or regional level are compiled by various organizations, each of which collects different types of information. Summary data from a number of databases are provided in Annex 1 to this report, in particular the UN Comtrade database, the World Customs Organisation database, the EU Export Helpdesk, and from data collected through the EU Veterinary regulations. Most of these data sources do not distinguish between the marine and freshwater sectors and the figures relate to one or more of: weight, number of organisms or value. As a result, it is not possible to compare directly the data from the different sources. Furthermore, the measures used have their limitations – estimates based on freight weight are affected by fish size and the volume of water in which the fish are transported, while estimates based on economic value will be subject to inflation, fluctuations in currency values and price to consumer. Moreover, datasets are also variable in terms of the years for which there is data available. Nevertheless, the data within each category can be used to demonstrate where markets exist, to identify major exporting and importing countries, and to gain an impression about the relative levels of trade.


Marine ornamental species involved in the aquarium trade are mostly associated with coral reefs from tropical coastal seas. Coral reefs provide millions of people with a range of benefits including fisheries, tourism and coastal protection. Most coral reefs are located in developing countries, with millions depending directly on them as a source of protein and, at least in part, for their livelihoods. Reefs also support non-food commercial fisheries including the marine ornamental fishery (Spalding et al., 2001). Coral reefs face an increasing number of threats, including overfishing, destructive fishing methods (breaking corals or using chemicals), coral mining, sedimentation as a result of poor land use practices, marine pollution, boat anchoring, tourism-related activities (Rajasuriya et al., 1998), periodic infestations of crown of thorns star fish, and coral bleaching episodes (Hughes, 2003; McClanahan, 2002). Reefs of South East Asia, the most important source of the majority of animals in the marine ornamental trade, are particularly at risk, with 88% of all reefs at medium to very high threat from anthropogenic impacts (Chou et al., 2002; Lecchini et al., 2006).



Wood (2001) estimated that about 14-30 million coral reef fish were collected every year for the aquarium trade and Wabnitz et al. (2003) estimated annual global trade


in marine species of between 20 and 24 million individuals. Although at present the ornamental industry is dominated by mostly freshwater species, experts have indicated that increasing popularity for coral reef aquaria may become the dominant trend during the 21st century (Olivier, 2001). Concerns have been raised by conservationists and marine biologists about the effects of the industry on coral reef habitats and their species (Andrews, 1990), in particular the state of the South East Asian marine ornamental stock (Lecchini et al., 2006). Threats include overexploitation of target species, secondary effects on coral reef communities, high post-harvest mortality levels and damaging methods of collection (Wood, 2001a). Interviews with collectors and suppliers in Sri Lanka indicated a declining trend in marine ornamental fish abundance, with catch effort increasing greatly, while export data showed a decrease from 1996-1999 and a consistent demand for ornamental species (Wilhelmsson et al., 2002). Most of those interviewed considered coral bleaching to be the greatest cause for declining catches as well as an increased number of fish collectors, destructive methods used for fish food and to a lesser extent ornamental collection, water pollution, coral mining and contamination of water by waste (Wilhelmsson et al., 2002). Although the collection of ornamental fish from coral reefs has been recognized as having potential impacts on coral degradation, the extent of the activity has not been quantified and may often be one of many extractive activities that occur (Wood, 2001). Other direct uses of coral and marine fauna may include the reef fish food trade, traditional small-scale fisheries, the jewellery and curio trades, construction materials, traditional medicines and pharmaceuticals (Liebermann & Field, 2001). Other indirect factors can influence the state of aquarium fisheries such as pollution, war, political upheaval, deforestation or airline strikes (Olivier, 2001). For example, trade from Eritrea virtually stopped several times due to political instability and war (Daw et al., 2001). Many traders argue that the collection of specimens for the aquarium trade does not significantly impact reef fish populations which are continually replenished (Wood, 2001a). This may be the case in areas where the fishery has been relatively small and the resource is plentiful. Catch per Unit Effort (CPUE) recorded in 1990 over four years in the Cook Islands showed that levels had remained constant and was likely to be sustainable (Bertram, 1996). In the ornamental fisheries on the Great Barrier Reef in Australia, although the total annual harvest was 200,000 fish, a single coral reef can support 10 million fish (QFMA, 1999). Dawes (2002) highlighted that the ornamental marine fish harvest (70-100 tonnes) represented a maximum of one millionth (0.00007-0.0001%) of the food fish harvest (100 million tonnes) and that even the by-catch (17 million tonnes) produced by the food fish trade was greater than the harvest for marine ornamentals (representing 0.0004-0.0006%). Watson & Moreau (2006) argued that the effects of collection for the ornamental trade “can pale into insignificance compared to major ecosystem threats such as coral bleaching or forest clearance”. Lubbock & Polunin (1975) reported that the marine aquarium industry alone is unlikely to endanger a species, although local extirpations can be caused by unmonitored collection and ecological effects on the reef ecosystem can add to the range of impacts that exist.




A large proportion of fish species collected for the aquarium trade are small, brightly-coloured reef fish that survive relatively well in captivity. There is also some demand for larger fish, particularly in public aquaria which have larger capacity tanks for sharks, moray eels and groupers (Wood, 2001a). The main marine fish groups that have dominated the aquarium market are: Pomacentridae, Acanthuridae, Balistidae, Labridae, Pomacanthidae, Chaetodontidae and Syngnathidae (Olivier, 2001). Amphiphrion spp., Dascyllus spp., Chaetodon spp. are among the favoured genera as they are small, robust and long-lived (Olivier, 2001).



At least 95% of the species exploited for the aquarium industry are reportedly taken directly from the reef (Lecchini et al., 2006). A wide range of collection methods are used, with scuba or hookah gear commonly being used (Wood, 2001a). The industry has often received negative publicity concerning damage from collection methods and high rates of mortality (Wabnitz et al., 2003), although such malpractice is considered to be the exception rather than the norm (Dawes, 2002). Before collection begins, the core of good practice is implementing a collection area management plan to manage the marine aquarium fisheries properly and sustainably (C. Schmidt, MAC, pers comm., 2007). Considerable skill is required to collect fish efficiently without causing damage to the habitat. Techniques vary and may be specific to a particular species. Some collection techniques have minimal impact on coral reefs (Wood, 2001b). Lines with small barbless hooks are used for species that are difficult to trap and tubular nets may be used to catch species that live in burrows as they are tickled out of their hiding place (Wood & Rajasuriya, 1999; Wood, 2001a). Various types of non-destructive nets are used in Sri Lanka, Australia, Hawaii and the Pacific (Ogawa & Brown, 2001; Randall, 1987; Wilhelmmson et al., 2002; Wood, 2001a). In the Philippines and Indonesia, many marine ornamental collectors are free divers, who collect using handmade goggles and fins and sometimes a piece of rock to go deeper in a short time (Schmidt, MAC, pers comm., 2007). Other methods include the “pana”, a rifle using a modified harpoon with a small needle on the end used for catching Synchiropus splendidus, gobies and blennies. The “kapandra” or “hookah” methods involve diving methods (with air piped to the surface) to catch rare fish such as Holacanthus at depths of up to 18 metres (Olivier, 2001). In some cases, damaging techniques are used to collect reef specimens. In Brazil, corals are often deliberately smashed while harvesting the yellowtail damselfish, causing extensive damage (Gasparini et al., 2005). As many fish retreat and hide in burrows in the coral reef, collectors may use chemicals such as tranquilizers and anaesthetics including cyanide and quinaldine (Wood, 2001a) or poisons such as rotenone (Lubbock & Polunin, 1975) to make collection easier by temporarily stunning the fish to increase catch efficiency (Wood, 2001a; Randall, 1987). The use of cyanide in fisheries has been globally prohibited but enforcement has been difficult (Wood, 2001). Even though hundreds of thousands of dollars have been spent by governmental and non-governmental organizations to reform collection practices and avoid cyanide use, success has been limited (Cruz, 2001). Quinaldine is prohibited in some parts of the world but allowed for use in other


places such as Florida (Wood, 2001a). Other chemicals that have been used for collection in Puerto Rico include bleach, formalin and gasoline (Sadovy, 1992). Clove oil has been suggested as an eco-friendly alternative to these toxic chemicals (Erdmann, 1999). Once fish have been caught they may be kept in polythene bags, plastic containers or a plastic holding cage with a trap door. Deep water fish are brought to the surface slowly to prevent the bladder bursting (Randall, 1987). Some skilled collectors use a needle on a syringe to pierce the swim bladder, which avoids the wait and is apparently not stressful for the fish (Pyle, 1993). After the fish are landed they are taken for export or to a holding tank, although in some countries the fish are left in bags for several days with daily water and oxygen changes (Wood, 2001a). Water quality must be closely monitored to avoid disease. No standards appear to be in place for holding tanks or filtration systems for the aquarium trade, although Wood (2001a) observed that great efforts are focused to increase survival and minimise loss of stock from holding tanks and during onward transport. Fish are packed separately for transport, in bags and then in Styrofoam boxes, for a maximum of 48 hours, with 10-60 fish per box depending on the size of the fish (Wood, 2001a).



Mortality rates in the industry may increase when collectors are unskilled and take little care of the health and conditions in which the fish are kept (Olivier, 2001). As Barratt & Medley (1990) pointed out, in cases where collection is undertaken as a means to supplement the income of people in unrelated professions, the collectors may not have any formal training, risking increased mortality and overexploitation. For example, in Brazil, marine fish were reported to be inadequately handled and stored in most cases (Gasparini et al., 2005) and mortality immediately after collection and in holding tanks was estimated to be at least 30-40% (Gasparini, pers. obs. 19952003 in Gasparini et al., 2005). Schmidt and Kunzmann (2005) reported post-harvest mortality rates of 10-40%, with total losses, including injured fish, of between 25-51% in six consignments delivered to a branch station in Indonesia. Well-managed shipping and husbandry practices can help keep mortality levels low, as has been shown by some operators in the industry (Wabnitz et al., 2003).



Fish populations with narrow geographical ranges and low population densities can be the most vulnerable to exploitation. In general, narrow-endemic species have been more susceptible to overexploitation. However, vulnerability to exploitation may vary, as a relatively rare widespread species which occurs at low densities may be more vulnerable to exploitation than an endemic but highly abundant species (Wood, 2001a). Lubbock & Polunin (1975) reflected that even marine species with narrow distributions often occupy a relatively large range in relation to the area in which they are exploited. Reproductive factors, including fecundity and the rate and frequency of recruitment, have a significant impact on the recovery rate of a species after exploitation. The location of a coral reef may affect its resilience, with species on upstream reefs being less resilient to exploitation than downstream reefs due to lower fluxes of larval


recruitment (Sale, 2002). Parental care and reproductive strategies that limit breeding potential are common in reef species, and represented 75.3% of marine aquarium species in trade from Brazil (Gasparini et al., 2005). Since many adult reef species are sedentary, when they are removed the site may be depopulated (Olivier, 2001). Fishing juveniles could be a better method than fishing sedentary adults, which soon depopulates the reef. Juveniles also adapt better to captivity (Olivier, 2001). Natural fluctuations in recruitment, in population size, and according to season should be considered when assessing and managing ornamental fishes (Barratt & Medley, 1990). For example, some coralivorous species such as butterflyfish have been shown to decrease following bleaching and coral mortality events (Wilhelmmson et al., 2002). Olden et al. (2007) found that commercial fishing activities disproportionately threaten large-bodied marine and freshwater species, whereas habitat degradation and loss threaten smaller-bodied marine fishes. The removal of certain species can affect others in unexpected ways through behavior and dominance (aggressive, territorial behavior) which can affect distribution of species to the same degree or more as extractive activities themselves (Lubbock & Polunin, 1975). The effect of collecting closely-interacting symbiotic species is unknown (Wood, 2001a). Cleaner wrasses, gobies (Côté, 2000) and juvenile fish of species such as butterflyfish and angelfish remove parasites from other fish and turtles. Fishing pressure on these species for the marine aquarium trade has the potential to affect host species that rely on their ‘cleaning services’. The cleaner wrasse Labroides dimidiatus is a very popular species in the trade and 20,000 were exported annually from Sri Lanka (Wood & Rajasuriya, 1999). Edward & Shepherd (1992) expressed concern at the high trade in Labroides from the Maldives and potential negative impact on the health of other reef fishes. In Brazil, the large harvest of cleaner neon gobies (Elacatinus figaro or Gobiosoma evelynae) may negatively affect other fish species, including commercially important ones (Monteiro-Neto et al., 2003). The Bangaii cardinalfish (Pterapogon kauderni), endemic to the Bangaii Islands (Allen & Steene, 1995), is widely regarded as vulnerable to exploitation for several reasons. The population was estimated to be 2.4 million and apparently 700,000-900,000 specimens collected and traded per year have been exported to Europe, the US and Japan since its rediscovery in 1995 (Kolm & Berglund, 2002). The Bangaii cardinalfish has a restricted range due to its reproductive strategy of intense parental care: it lacks a pelagic larval stage (Vagelli, 1999) and has a relatively small clutch size which the male mouthbroods for 30 days (Kolm, 2004). The natural range of this fish extends over 5,500km² but because the species occurs at a preferred depth range of 1.5-2.5 metres and only occurs along 426km of coastline at about 100m offshore, its actual range of distribution is only 34 km² (Dawes, 2007). Kolm & Berglund (2003) observed a decrease in group size with fishing pressure. These authors pointed out that this may have indirect effects on characteristics associated with group living such as a reduced predation dilution and reduction of anti-predator vigilance. Particularly in view of low dispersal rates and loyal behavior of fish of this species to their group, indirect effects on group size due to fishing pressure could impact population dynamics due to lower genetic diversity within groups (Kolm & Berglund, 2003). The conservation status of this species was discussed at the CITES CoP 14 in June 2007 but the proposal to list it on Appendix II was rejected as its status has been difficult to assess due to a lack of data and the possibility that the species may be relatively abundant overall despite localized declines. In September 2007 the SRG 6

recommended that the species be listed in Annex D to the Wildlife Trade Regulations. Culturing can be an alternative to collection from the wild, but it does have disadvantages (Section 2.3.6). More research on reproduction of species in captivity is needed to improve mortality rates, though the quality and life expectancy of farmed fish is generally higher than those collected in the wild (Olivier, 2001). The feeding habits of some species make them unsuitable for keeping in aquaria (Barratt & Medley, 1990). Some UK importers have stopped importing species that are too difficult to feed or to maintain in aquaria (Dawes & Sankey cited by Andrews, 1990). However, Edwards & Shepherd (1992) recorded a significant number of Chaetodon meyeri and C. triangulum exported from the Maldives, despite there being low probability of survival in captivity.

In many cases, the impact of ornamental fisheries is selective and focused on species with high market values such as butterflyfish and angelfish, or easily caught species such as anemonefish and lionfish (Lubbock & Polunin, 1975). Marine biologists have reported declines of species that have become rarer over time, through personal observation and/or from surveys: butterflyfish in Sri Lanka (Lubbock & Polunin, 1975); Amphiprion allardi and A.akallopisos in Kenya (Lubbock & Polunin, 1975); angelfish in Florida (Noyes, 1976); several species in Seribu Islands of Indonesia (Soegiarto & Polunin, 1982); butterflyfish, triggerfish and angelfish in the Philippines (Albaladejo and Corpuz, 1984); angelfish Centropyge bispinosus, emperor angelfish Pomacanthus imperator and blue tang Paracanthurus hepatus in the Philippines (Rubec, 1987); and Pomacanthus maculosus and P.chtysurus in Kenya (Samoilys, 1988). Other reported declines include black angelfish Chaetodontoplus personifer and scribbled angelfish C. duboulayi in Australia (QFMA, 1999), and IndoPacific blue tang, powder blue tang, blue girdled fish and emperor angelfish in Indonesia (Boggiatto & Reiser, 2004). Depletions attributed to collection for aquaria include: French and grey angelfish in Brazil (Gasparini et al:, 2005); Acanthurus achilles, Chaetodon multicinctus, C. quadrimaculatus, Centropyge potteri, Forcipiger spp. Zanclu cornutus and Zebrasoma flavescens in Hawaii (Tissot & Hallacher, 1999); and Holacanthus clarionensis in Mexico (Almenara-Rolan & Ketchum, 1994). Kolm & Berglund (2003) investigated the effects of non-destructive fishing, without the use of poison or explosives, on the conservation status of the Bangaii cardinalfish. They found that the Bangaii cardinalfish had declined in density due to the pressure from marine aquarium fisheries despite non-destructive methods being used and only six years of activity. Populations had halved in locations where fishing pressure had been high (Kolm, 2004). Certain endemic marine species with restricted distribution such as Gramma brasiliensis (or G. loreto) in Brazil may be at risk to localized fishing pressure, as well as species which are already threatened (such as Hippocampus erectus and Balistes vetula), due to other forms of commercial exploitation (Monteiro-Neto et al., 2003). Some good practices have been put in place in Australia, for example, where one anemonefish is spared at each host anemone which helps new recruits to locate a host and join a group (QFMA, 1999). Shuman et al. (2005) suggested leaving behind


the largest breeding female, as research has found that up to two thirds of removed breeding males are replaced by foreign males who share parental responsibility. There are reports of ornamental fisheries which have not exhibited serious declines despite being subject to high levels of exploitation. One of the most heavily exploited species, the yellow tang (Zebrasoma flavescens), showed no overall declines when assessed over two years in Hawaii (Taylor & Nolan, 1978), although Tissot & Hallacher (1999) found a significantly lower abundance of yellow tang in collection sites than in control sites in Hawaii.

Juveniles are generally preferred to adults by collectors (except gobies, blennies and dottybacks). This may reduce overexploitation as breeding adults remain on the reef and are therefore able to produce new recruits. However, overfishing can still occur if juveniles are constantly removed from the population and new breeding adults do not replace older ones. Chan & Sadovy (1998) revealed that 56% of fish being sold in Hong Kong were within the juvenile size range. Fishing for certain species may be unselective (eg. Bangaii cardinalfish) where most sizes and ages are suitable for home aquaria (Kolm & Berglund, 2003). Males are sometimes selectively fished (e.g. mandarin fish, Synchiropus splendidus) for their more attractive and flamboyant appearance (Wood, 2001a).



As the main ornamental species in trade are from tropical and subtropical regions of the world, they are often sourced from developing countries (Rana, 2004). According to FAO statistics, developing countries account for 63% of the export value (Bartley, 2000). Articles in the press have often made the assumption that the trade of marine ornamentals is incompatible with reef conservation (Wabnitz et al., 2003). However, the exploitation of ornamental fish can provide an incentive for habitat and holistic ecosystem conservation. On similar lines to Project Piaba in the Amazon, “Buy a fish and save a tree”, marine species could be used to help protect coral reefs (Dawes, 2002). The economic value of natural resources is increasingly being recognised, with activities such as dive tourism being recognised as dependent on preserving coral reefs. Marine fish species exploited for the ornamental trade are often different to those exploited for food trade (Edwards & Shepherd, 1992) and mostly associated with reef habitats – collection for the ornamental trade can add another value to ecosystem and biodiversity conservation particularly when no economic activity previously existed (Bartley, 2000).



The distribution network for ornamental fish is large and complex, with a number of coexisting subsystems (Olivier, 2001). Fishermen and collectors constitute the first part of the supply chain. Collectors may be part-time, full-time, self-employed or employed by a dealer or exporter. Usually they work directly for a wholesaler or exporter, and few are part of associations where their views can be represented (Olivier, 2001). Fishermen sometimes sell non-target ornamental fish caught in traps to aquarium dealers (Wood, 2001b). Pay is usually relative to the number of fish collected and can be poor in comparison to final sale value. A collector may receive


10 cents in Indonesia for Amphiprion percula sold for $12 to a hobbyist in an importing country (Wood, 2001b). Local collectors are usually involved but some companies employ skilled collectors from elsewhere to work in particular areas, e.g. from the Philippines in Eritrea (Daw et al., 1998; Daw et al., 2001) and in Yemen (pers. comm. cited in Wood, 2001a). Small export companies have two or three individuals involved with half a dozen tanks. Larger export companies employ a large workforce and have hundreds of tanks (Wood, 2001a). Exporters may buy from wholesalers or directly from breeders and collectors. Fish are usually quarantined before export to enable any diseases to be detected and treated and to acclimatize the fish to life in captivity. Exporters go through a national procedure before export, including obtaining a special licence or permit for export, phytosanitary certificate, and declaration to Customs (Olivier, 2001). Requirements on arrival in importer country vary. In some cases, a phytosanitary certificate is required and another quarantine period may be undertaken to ensure acclimatization of the fish to water, food and captive conditions (Olivier, 2001). Importers sell fish to wholesalers for distribution to retailers, directly to retailers or may re-export fish to another country (Olivier, 2001). Alternatively, retailers can use a transhipper. The role of the wholesaler is to group together ornamental products for redistribution and to acclimatize fish, whereas the transhipper groups together and collects orders from different retailers. Traditional wholesalers are becoming less common now as transhipping becomes more common and with increasing use of the electronic market. Airline companies are also key players in the aquarium trade because the conditions of transport have a direct influence of the health and quality of fish traded (OFI, 2003). Packaging is carried out according to international criteria set by transport associations for live animals prior to departure on international flights. As this is a highly profitable sector for airline companies, they have an interest in ensuring a good quality service (Olivier, 2001). There are many associations and syndicates of individuals involved in the marine ornamental industry. Examples include: Indonesia Corals, Shells, and Ornamental Fish Association; Philippine Tropical Fish Exporters Association; Singapore Aquarium Fish Exporters’ Association; Ornamental Fish International; Ornamental Aquatic Trade Association; and Pet Industry Joint Advisory Council.



The value of the ornamental trade represents only 0.5% of FAO statistics for the international fish trade, yet its importance goes beyond its share in the international market. The sector plays a valuable role in providing employment opportunities and income to rural, coastal and insular communities in the developing world through export-generated revenues (Olivier, 2001). The trade in ornamentals also supports the market for a multi-million dollar industry in aquarium tanks, filter systems and other accessories (Rana, 2004). Aquarium animals are the highest value-added product that can be harvested sustainably from coral reefs. The difference in price between fish for the aquarium trade and for the food trade is of a ratio of 1 to 100 due to the higher risk costs of mortality and specific measures needed for transportation of live animals (Olivier, 2001). Dawes (2002) highlighted this point when comparing the average retail price of marine ornamental fish (US$1,800,000/tonne) with the average retail price for food fish (US$14,5000-16,500/tonne). 9

Export prices vary greatly from country-to-country and according to the distance from exporter to importer, as freight costs can represent 50-90% of the landed price. Production costs, stock quality and local inflation rates also influence the price. Prices for marine species tend to fluctuate much more than for freshwater species (Olivier, 2001). Import prices can vary depending on the number of fish bought or as a result of the season, as conditions (such as climate) may affect the availability of certain species for sale (Olivier, 2001). The rate of mortality will also affect the price per fish. The importer marks up the price when selling to the retailer or wholesaler to account for costs such as labour, overheads and supplies. Similarly, the retail price is marked up to include running costs and costs that may be incurred, such as loss from mortality (Olivier, 2001). In cases where the main trade companies involved in export are large multinational groups that have a monopoly over the industry, benefits to local fishermen may be limited. This was the case in Eritrea where one US and one German company operated the fishery (Daw et al., 2001). Furthermore, collectors were brought in from the Philippines to work for one of these companies, thereby limiting the employment opportunities available to locals (Daw et al., 2001) Aquarium fisheries have the potential to provide an alternative economic activity for coastal populations, an important source of foreign exchange for national economies and a strong economic incentive for the sustainable management of reefs (Daw et al., 2001). If managed sustainably, the trade in marine ornamentals can support jobs in predominantly rural, low-income coastal communities and provide strong economic incentives for coral reef conservation in regions where other options for generating revenue are limited. Local people in exporter countries have the right to earn a living from natural resources that surround them and the ornamental fish trade offers the opportunity to do this in a sustainable and equitable way (Daw et al., 2001; Watson & Moreau, 2006).



Apart from conservation issues associated with the sustainability of the industry, other issues which may affect sustainability are lack of organisation of the sector, miscommunication, lack of awareness and the perception of ornamentals as disposable items by consumers and exporters (Olivier 2001). The interaction of the ornamental fishery with other extractive activities is also worth noting. Although not then a source of conflict, in the late 1980s-1990s Edwards & Shepherd (1992) highlighted the potential conflict between dive tourism or ecotourism and the ornamental fishery in places such as the Maldives where the main attraction is the coral reef. Lubbock & Polunin (1975) also noted this potentially important conflict in economic terms to the industry. Another source of potential conflict is the use of some ornamental species as bait (Edwards & Shepherd, 1992).



The aquarium trade can provide the opportunity to educate the public about coral reefs and increase awareness and understanding of what is often perceived as a hidden ecosystem (Wabnitz et al., 2003). The trade may also foster marine conservation by providing a strong incentive for subsistence fishers to harvest wild populations sustainably, and to maintain fish stocks and reef environments in good condition (Woods, 2001).




The first international conference on marine ornamentals was held in 1999 in Hawaii (Corbin, 2001). In 1994, a co-operative called the Federation of Fishermen of Ornamental Fishing in the Philippines (PMP) was created, following a training programme to reduce the use of damaging practices for collection of ornamentals. This allowed fishermen to participate in discussions with the government and other pressure groups as well as setting up their own storage and export facilities in collaboration with NGOs and thus enabled fishermen to be able to certify their fish as being caught using nets (Olivier, 2001).



One of the first success stories of cultured marine ornamental species was the clownfish (Amphiprion spp.). The culture of species such as the Bangaii cardinalfish in marine cages or in artificial conditions has also been successful and recommended, as it is possible to complete the entire life cycle (Kolm & Berglund, 2003). Wild populations can potentially be re-stocked when conservation status reaches critical levels. The giant clam (Tridacna gigas) recovered following reintroductions into the wild, to the point that it could be traded again (Tlusty, 2004). Recent advances in technology, including improvements in feeds for different life cycle stages will enable more species to be cultured in the industry (Tlusty, 2004). Rearing larvae collected at the end of the planktonic phase before they settle on the reef and then grown to a commercial size has also been recommended (Dufour et al., 1999; Lecchini et al., 2006). The conservation concern for the state of wild stocks of some marine ornamental species will stimulate the development of captive breeding operations (Tlusty, 2004), so the negative impacts of ornamental marine aquaculture should be taken into account. If the success of captive breeding operations results in increased demand at a pace that production through aquaculture cannot meet, the level of harvest from the wild may increase. In other cases, when a brood stock cannot be maintained in captivity, mature adults need to be sourced from the wild. The main criticism identified through Project Seahorse 2 was that the culture of seahorses serves no conservation benefit where the regular removal of breeding pairs from the wild is required (Tlusty, 2004), and where aquaculture of seahorses could raise demand for previously non-commercialized wild species. Escapees from farms may interact with wild populations. In the US, where there are many ornamental aquaculture operations, approximately 185 species have been introduced and have established populations (Tlusty, 2004). Increased nutrient loading from organic waste creates problems such as eutrophication and the risk of parasites and disease in farms results in the use of chemicals, antibodies and pesticides. Very little is known about the local effects of marine ornamental farms, although the impacts are unlikely to be very negative in terms of pollution (Tlusty, 2004). Higher stress levels due to crowding and captive conditions in aquaculture can lead to disease proliferation. Pathogenic agents reduce survival of reared ornamental fish and can potentially spread to the wild. In Australia, imports were suspended for the panther grouper (Cromileptes altivelis) by
2 11

the Australian Quarantine and Inspection Service which received information on the increase of this species coming from aquaculture facilities where pathogen risks may be higher (Dawes, 2005). Although 95% of fish exploited for the aquarium industry are reportedly taken from the wild (Lecchini et al., 2006), efforts to breed and raise marine ornamentals in captivity are in progress (Tlusty, 2002). At the end of the 1990s, 25 species were cultured for commercial purposes but most specimens (~98%) were taken from the wild (Moe, 1999). According to Olivier (2001), 16 marine species can now be bred and are farmed and commercially available. These comprise: • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Amphiprion ocellaris Amphiprion percula Amphiprion melanopus Amphiprion rubrocinctus Amphiprion frenatus Amphiprion ephippium Amphiprion clarkia Amphiprion perideraion Amphiprion akallopsis Amphiprion akindynos Gobiosoma oceanops Gobiodon citrinnus Premnas biaculeatus Pseudochromis fridman Pseudochromis flavivertex Pterapogon kauderni.

They represent 2-3% of the 25% of marine ornamental species which could potentially be cultured (Tlusty, 2004). Efforts are underway to breed four further species: • Amphiprion chryopterous • Amphiprion bicinctus • Amphiprion polymnus • Elactinus xanthipora. Research is being undertaken to breed the following: • • • • • • • • • • • • • Gramma loreto Hypoplectrus unicolor Equetus punctatus Equetus lanceolatus Pomacanthus paru Pomacanthus arcatus Apogon spp. Chromis cyanea Microspathodon chrysurus Bodianus rufus Opistognathus aurifrons Hypsypops rubicunda Diodon spp.


• • • •

Calloplesiops altivelis Synchiropus splendons Hippocampus erectus Anisotremus virginicus.

Aquaculture can provide an alternative source of income and productivity can be greater than collection from the wild. Safety and health risks of venturing out to sea and diving are reduced as well as the time invested in searching and capturing fish. Women may be involved in the ornamental trade, particularly in fish farming (Bartley, 2000). However, aquaculture production can also reduce market prices as supply increases, which can have negative impacts on fishermen-collectors. In cases where ornamental aquaculture productions are not small scale and local but industrial and owned by a large company, the benefits to local people may be much more reduced (Daw et al., 2001). Aquaculture facilities may also be set up closer to consumer countries, reducing employment opportunities in the country of origin where local people may rely on collection and fishing for all or part of their income (Tlusty, 2004). This may be the case in Eritrea where 75 species are collected for the ornamental trade (600,000 exported per year) (Daw et al., 2001) but many of these species can be cultured outside of the country. This could remove job opportunities as well as an incentive to conserve coral reefs (Tlusty, 2004). One suggestion by John Dawes at the World Conference on Ornamental Fish was to introduce an element of ‘compensation’ to the country of origin: a similar concept to that used by the FAO on genetic resources (Bartley, 2000). A growing proportion of marine ornamentals are predicted to be sourced from aquaculture (Tlusty, 2004). Lessons can be learned from successes and difficulties in food fish and freshwater ornamental aquaculture to develop best-practices for the ornamental industry (Tlusty, 2002).


Freshwater habitats include marshes and fens, rivers and lakes, and artificial bodies such as rice fields and reservoirs. Large lakes are found in North America (particularly Canada) and northern Russia, and ancient lakes are found in the African Rift Valley and the Lake Baikal region of Siberia in the Russian Federation. Freshwater ecosystems are very diverse, representing 40% of global fish diversity and 25% of global vertebrate diversity (Dudgeon et al., 2006); however, knowledge of the species in freshwater ecosystems is very incomplete (Cowx, 2002; Cowx et al., 2004; Dudgeon et al., 2006). Levels of endemism are particularly high in inland wetlands e.g. the Great East African Lakes or Lake Baikal in Siberia, which have been isolated from other water bodies for millions of years (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, 2005). Freshwater species are often subjected to a range of threats, the relative impacts of which are difficult to dissentangle (Cowx, 2002; Cowx et al., 2004). The Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) estimated that approximately 20% of the world’s described freshwater fish species have been listed as threatened or extinct.


Infrastructure development, land conversion, water extraction, pollution, overharvesting and overexploitation, and the introduction of alien species were considered to be the main direct causes of the deterioration in the extent and quality of freshwater habitats (Andrews, 1990; Dudgeon et al., 2006; FAO, 2007; Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, 2005). Cowx (2002) highlighted species introductions, dams and weirs, and water quality as the main threats to freshwater fish and fisheries. In addition, climate change is expected to exacerbate the loss and degradation of many wetlands (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, 2005). Wild harvest of freshwater ornamental fish for trade primarily occurs in South America (in particular Amazonia), East and West Africa, and South and South East Asia. Each of these regions is characterized by distinctive habitats and fish assemblages, which lead to differences in the nature of the trade.



Freshwater habitats provide many economic, social and ecological services and functions, including fish supply for consumption, provision of drinking water, water purification and detoxification, climate regulation and mitigation of climate change, recreation and tourism, and cultural and societal functions (Cowx et al., 2004; Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, 2005). Freshwater ecosystems are an important source of dietary protein in many parts of the world, in particular rural communities in developing countries, and are therefore linked to global food security (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, 2005).



The Amazon River basin, which stretches more than seven million square kilometres, is the largest river basin in the world (Junk et al., 2007). It is a diverse ecosystem, both in terms of its aquatic habitats and species richness. About 2,500 fish species have already been described and it was estimated that more than 1,000 new species remain to be discovered (Junk et al., 2007). In many large areas, the low density of the human population means that aquatic habitats are still in relatively good condition (Junk et al., 2007). However, pressures on aquatic ecosystems and habitats have increased, mainly due to large-scale destruction of natural vegetation cover, small-scale agriculture, logging in rainforests, and construction of dams (Junk et al., 2007). Pollution, including mercury contamination and siltation as a result of gold mining, is problematic in some areas, for example, the Rio Nanay in Peru (Gerstner et al., 2006). Rodríguez et al. (2007) reported that large regions of the Orinoco basin were still in a relatively pristine condition, but that threats from habitat destruction, overharvesting, pollution, and hydrological perturbation were increasing. About 16.4% of the Amazon River basin is protected, while another 15.2% is under partial protection in indigenous reserves in Brazil (Junk et al., 2007). Brazil intends to protect a further 9.1% as reserves in the next 10 years (Junk et al., 2007).

East Africa is home to a number of large, species-rich lakes, often referred to as the Great Lakes, which include the rift valley lakes Albert (Mobutu), Edward-George, Kivu, Malawi (Nyasa), Tanganyika and Turkana (Rudolf); the inter-rift lakes Kyoga 14

and Victoria; several others including Bangweulu, Chad and Chilwa; and the manmade lakes of Cahora, Bassa, Kainjii, Kariba and Volta (Craig, 1992). The African Great lakes have been affected by overexploitation and introduction of exotic species, but the impact of each has been difficult to quantify (Craig, 1992). Eutrophication and decline in water quality is also problematic e.g. in Lake Victoria (Lung'ayia et al., 2001). Fishing pressures, in particular to feed local and other populations, have increased in all of the lakes due to an increase in human populations and changes in fishing techniques (Craig, 1992). The introduction of fisheries species such as Oreochromis leucostictus, O. niloticus, Tilapia redalli, T. zillii and Lates niloticus in Lakes Kyoga and Victoria, and the Limnothrissa miodon in Lakes Kivu, Kariba and Cahora Bassa are likely to have affected native faunas, though measuring the impact has proved challenging (Craig, 1992; Ligvoet & Witte, 1991). However, recent recoveries in cichlid fishes have been reported in Lake Victoria and Lake Nabugabo as a result of intense fishing of the introduced Lates niloticus (Witte et al., 2000). West Africa is another species-rich area, and the Guinea Rainforest has been listed as a Global Biodiversity hotspot by Conservation International. However, this region faces some of the same threats as those that face East Africa. Alien species, including O. niloticus, Clarias gariepinus and Heterotis niloticus have been introduced for aquaculture or accidentally, and have led to the disappearance of several native species from commercial catches (Brummet, 1995).

South-East Asia benefits from a climate of year-round warmth, high humidity and light with the result that is very diverse, both in terms of habitats and freshwater fish (Ng & Tan, 1997). Scott & Poole (1989) estimated that over 120 million hectares of wetlands, excluding permanent rice paddies, were present in the region from Pakistan in the west to China, Japan, Indonesia and Papua New Guinea in the east, with 80% occurring in Indonesia, China, India, Papua New Guinea, Bangladesh, Myanmar, and Viet Nam. There is a huge variety of wetlands in Asia, from rivers, lakes, estuaries, but those considered to be most threatened were mangrove forests, freshwater swamp forests and peat swamp forests (Scott & Poole, 1989).



More than 4,000 species of ornamental freshwater fish are traded internationally each year (Whittington & Chong, 2007). One major European importer listed 700-800 species of freshwater and marine species as ‘commonly available’ (Andrews, 1990). The Cyprinidae Family is an important family of freshwater fishes that is distributed throughout Africa (except Madagascar), Asia, Europe and North America, and whose species are often dominant where they are found. It includes goldfish, minnows, barbs, rasboras and danios. Species from this family are traded for food and for ornamental purposes. Other important groups in the ornamental trade include the Callichthyidae, Cichlidae, Characidae, Gasteropelecidae, Loricariidae and Osteoglossidae.

Crampton (1999b) estimated that 150 ornamental species were regularly exported from the Amazon, but noted that market demand focused on a small number of 15

species. Popular aquarium fishes caught from the wild in the Amazon and mostly purchased by home hobbyists include: bleeding-heart tetra Hyphessobrycon erythrostigma; cardinal tetra Paracheirodon axelrodi; cichlids Apistogramma spp.; corydoras catfish Corydoras spp. ; discus Symphysodon spp.; hatchet fish Carnegiella spp.; leopard cordoras Corydoras spp.; neon tetra Paracheirodon innesi; ocellate river stingray Potamotrygon spp.; otocinclus Otocinclus spp.; pictus cat Pimelodus pictus.; red-tail catfish Phractocephalus hemioliopterus; silver arowana Osteoglossum bicirrhosum; suckermouth catfish Hypostomus spp.; tiger ray Potamotrygon spp.; tiger-striped catfish Brachyplatystoma tigrinus; and zebra otocinclus Otocinclus spp. (Crampton, 1999b; Gerstner et al., 2006; Junk, 1984b; Moreau & Coomes, 2006; Moreau & Coomes, 2007). Moreau & Coomes (2007) reported trade from Peru in 704 varieties, from 139 genera and 36 families, and noted the five most important families (by volume) to be Characidae, Gasteropelecidae, Osteoglossidae, Callichthyidae and Loricariidae. Gerstner et al. (2006) estimated that over 300 species were probably exported from the Peruvian Amazon and approximately 60% of the trade comprised 10 species. Moreau & Coomes (2007) supported this view also found that most (70%) of the trade involved around ten species. By contrast, it was estimated that around 60 species were exported from Brazil (Chao, 1992), and Crampton (1999b) reported that Paracheirodon axelrodi represented 81.6% of the total. Osteoglossum bicirrhosum is a popular fish exported from Brazil, Colombia, Guyana and Peru (Moreau & Coomes, 2006). Exports of this species from Peru reportedly increased more than 100-fold between 1978 and 2001, and over one million juveniles were sold internationally in 2001 (Moreau & Coomes, 2006). This species, along with Phractocephalus hemiliopterus and Brachyplatystoma tigrinus was considered the most economically important species in Peru (Moreau & Coomes, 2006). Approximately 30,000 Symphysodon aequifasciatus were harvested from the Estação Ecológica Mamirauá in Brazil in 1990 (Crampton, 1999b), which decreased to an estimated 10,000-20,000 fish in 1991, 300-500 in 1992, and 200 in 1993 when commercial extinction of the species was apparent (Crampton, 1999b). Symphysodon spp. and Pterophyllum scalare were extracted in the mid-late 1980s from the Jarauá lake system in Brazil, but commercial exploitation began in earnest in 1990 (Crampton, 1999b). In Guyana, the sustainable, community-based aquarium fisheries business Iwokrama concentrates primarily on 30 Loricariid Catfish species 3 which they categorized as high-value, low-volume aquarium species. Five taxa were particularly targeted: lemon fin Hemiancistrus spp.; red-tailed pleco Pseudacanthicus leopardus; bushy nose Ancistrus spp.; cochliodon Hypostomus cochliodon; and hypostomus Hypostomus plecostomus.

Brummet (2005) suggested that fish with potential as ornamentals were unusually abundant in African rainforest rivers, and wholesaled at an average of US$2.43 per fish. These include Barbus camptacanthus and species from the genera Aphyosemion, Benitochromis, Brienomyrus (including Brienomyrus brachyistus), Brycinus (including

Iwokrama%20list.pdf 16

Brycinus longipinnis), Epiplatys, Mastecembelus, Chiloglanis, Doumea, Neolebias, Parauchenoglanis, Pelvicachromis and Procatopus. One survey found that the total value of ornamental fish species in forest rivers in south-west Cameroon was insufficient to support any significant increase in the level of exploitation (Brummet, 2005). The IUCN Freshwater Biodiversity Assessment Unit (IUCN, 2007) has conducted four regional freshwater biodiversity assessments for fish. These are the Mediterranean endemic freshwater fish (Smith & Darwall, 2006) and comprehensive assessments (all freshwater fish species) for eastern (Darwall et al., 2005), western and southern Africa. The assessments for the last two are ongoing (as of November 2007), and although the species assessments have been evaluated, they may be subject to change. No data are yet available for the northern, north-eastern and central regions of Africa. The region boundaries are based on river basins and not political boundaries, except for eastern Africa and northeast Africa on the Nile. Over half of the endemic freshwater fish species in the Mediterranean are threatened, although no species were identified as being involved in the ornamental trade (Table 1). The western Africa assessment showed the highest level of threat for all species, with over one third of the species threatened. It was clear, that of the regions assessed, only western and eastern Africa had significant numbers of species that are found in the aquarium trade. For eastern Africa this included 21% of all the freshwater fish species, and just over 10% of the western Africa species. Only two species in southern Africa were identified as being in the aquarium trade and none from the Mediterranean endemic species. Similar levels of threat, for both eastern (around 27%) and western Africa (around 33%), are seen between the proportion of all the species threatened and the proportion of species in the aquarium trade that are threatened (IUCN, 2007). Three endemic species classified as Critically Endangered were identified as being in the aquarium trade: • Guinea - Scriptaphyosemion cauveti • Liberia - Epiplatys ruhkopfi • Tanzania - Lamprologus kungweensis endemic to Lake Tanganyika. Table 1. Freshwater fish species regional datasets and species in aquarium trade
All species in regional biodiversity assessment Region Species only identified as occurring in the aquarium trade

Total Threatened % Species in % Threatened % species species threatened aquarium total in threatened trade species aquarium trade Mediterranean Endemics 253 142 56.1 0 0 Eastern Africa All 1060 283 26.7 223 21.0 61 27.4 species Endemics 901 250 27.7 212 23.5 58 27.4 Southern All 359 40 11.1 2 0.5 0 0 Africa species Endemics 240 40 16.7 2 0.8 0 0 Western All 615 214 34.8 66 10.7 21 31.8 Africa species

the western Africa regional assessment not all the global and regional assessments have been separated out.


All eastern Africa species that were identified as being used in the aquarium trade are traded at an international level, about 5% are traded commercially within national borders, and less than 1% are traded locally. By contrast, in western Africa just over 40% of the aquarium species are traded internationally whereas nearly twothirds of trade, in terms of number of species (rather than volume of trade, which was not recorded), is at the national level. Also subsistence/local trade in western Africa also makes up a much greater proportion than in eastern Africa with nearly 30% of the species traded on this scale.

In East Africa, 223 species have been identified as being in the aquarium trade. Of these, 102 (45.7%) are threatened by the harvesting process and 49 (48%) of these are listed as vulnerable at the global level according to IUCN. In addition, 51 (23.3%) of the 223 species in the aquarium trade are identified as only being harvested from the wild, and 11 of these are threatened. No species were identified as being harvested only from captive breeding facilities; however 76.7% of the species were recorded as having an unknown source.

Much of the trade from South East Asia comprises non-native species that have been captive-bred in the region; these include guppies, goldfish, koi, mollies, swordtails and cichlids (Ng & Tan, 1997). Some native species are also captive-bred. Nonetheless, a significant number of wild-caught fish are also exported for the ornamental fish trade. Ng & Tan (1997) categorized wild-caught species according to their prevalence in the trade: • Category I. Popular species exported in high numbers, including the clown loach Botia macracanthus; eel loach Pangio spp.; chocolate gourami Sphaerichthys osphromenoides; pearl gourami Trichogaster leerii; harlequin rasbora Rasbora heteromorpha; flying fox Epalzeorhynchus kalopterus; apollo shark Luciosoma setigerum; two-spot catfish Mystus bimaculatus; and glass catfish Kryptopterus bicirrhis. Category II. Wild-caught species that are traded occasionally but have the potential for increased popularity and export, including species from the genera Bagrichthys, Barbucca, Betta, Boraras, Carinotetraodon, Channa, Chonerhinos, Eirmotus, Glyptothorax, Gymnochanda, Kryptopterus, Leiocassis, Lepidocephalichthys, Mastacembelus, Neohomaloptera, Osteochilus, Parosphromenus, Pseudomystus, Pseudotropius, Puntius, and Tetraodon. Category III. Very expensive species to supply the high end of the market, including the arowana Scleropages formosus; red-flag giant gourami Osphronemus laticlavius; and sawfish Pristis microdon (CITES Appendix II).

The main species in trade from Indonesia was reported to be Botia macracanthus, although there are discrepancies among estimates of trade levels. Kottelat & Whitten (1996) estimated that 10,000,000 were exported per year. Field surveys in Danau Sentarum indicated that some 2.4 million fish were caught annually; however, provincial trade statistics until 1995 indicated that between 50,000 and 300,000 individuals were caught (Kottelat & Whitten, 1996).




Harvesting techniques can heavily impact both the ecosystem and the survival of the fish on capture or subsequently in transport or when sold. A range of nets and traps are used to capture freshwater ornamental fish. Fishing practices are generally associated with an intimate knowledge of fish behaviour and habitats (Moreau & Coomes, 2007). Nets, traps and hook-and-lines are used in the Lower Guinea forest (Brummet, 2005). Various methods of collection in South East Asia were noted by Ng & Tan (1997), including traps and catching by hand. Banister (1980) reported that in Sri Lanka, streams may be poisoned in order to catch target species; this is now prohibited by the Fisheries and Aquatic Resources Act, No. 2 of 1996. Bycatch can be problematic: in the Okavango in Botswana, the small Barbus species is harvested when it forms shoals; for every B. multilineatus captured, up to one thousand other species might be captured and may be discarded (Banister, 1980).



Ornamental fish can suffer high mortality rates during catch, transport, quarantine and other practices, with one estimate of 80% mortality in the Amazon (Junk, 1984b) and up to 85% in the Lower Guinean rainforest (Brummet, 2005). Chao (1992) estimated that 30% mortality was suffered during the export process in Brazil. Moreau & Coomes (2007) suggested that substantial mortality rates might be suffered in holding facilities in Peru, due to the rudimentary export facilities.




Andrews (1990) noted the argument that certain life history traits, including short lifespan and high egg production, coupled with a relatively low-impact method of collection and limitations caused by seasonal extremes in rainfall, could in theory minimize the vulnerability of species to overexploitation in the Peruvian Amazon. Moreau & Coomes (2007) suggested that this argument has not been studied and that it was unlikely to apply to species with restricted geographic ranges or to those biologically unsuited to heavy exploitation. In practice, moderate levels of fishing did not appear to negatively affect some aquarium fish populations; however, populations from areas with relatively high fishing intensity experienced negative impacts (Gerstner et al., 2006). In the Amazon, many headwater species have restricted distributions and are therefore particularly vulnerable to large-scale environmental degradation (Junk et al., 2007). Some species, such as the discus Symphysodon spp., exhibit high site fidelity and a low rate of population dispersal, which means that recolonization and recovery of an overfished area is slow compared to species with higher dispersal rates, such as the cardinal tetra Paracheirodon axelrodi (Crampton, 1999b). Indeed Crampton (1999b) suggested that it would take 5-15 years for discus species to regain their former levels after exploitation. The late maturity, low fecundity and mouthbrooding of the silver arowana Osteoglossum bicirrhosum mean that it is vulnerable to overexploitation (Moreau & Coomes, 2006).


In some areas, such as the Estação Ecológica Mamirauá, the ease of collection at low water can lead to a high rate of capture, particularly for high value species such as discus (Crampton, 1999b). Reynolds et al. (2005) found that small-bodied freshwater fish in Europe were most at risk owing to their naturally small ranges, which means they are more vulnerable to habitat change. Many of the endemic species of the African Great lakes do not have the flexibility to alter life history traits, and are also very vulnerable to exploitation (Craig, 1992).

Junk (1984b) postulated that despite the high numbers collected, Amazonian fish were not likely to be seriously endangered. Many fish species suffer naturally high mortality rates due to seasonal modification of habitat and have adapted to these losses with a high rate of reproduction and short reproductive cycles (Junk, 1984b). By contrast, Andrews (1990) and Crampton (1999b) highlighted the cases of the discus Symphysodon spp. and the cardinal tetra Paracheiredon axelrodi, which became commercially extinct in the middle reaches of the Rio Negro as a result of exploitation for the ornamental fish trade. However, in a workshop on Amazon River diversity, Axelrod (2001) claimed that he had never seen any species in the Rio Negro or other Amazon regional river disappear, and that people stop collecting when it becomes unprofitable. Although Gerstner et al. (2006) believed that wild-caught aquarium fishes were potentially one of the few sustainable resources in the Amazon Basin, they suggested that evidence was not available to support claims of sustainability and that anecdotal evidence in Peru indicated that the number of species available was declining. In the Peruvian Amazon, Gerstner et al. (2006) found that high fishing pressure on freshwater aquarium species led to decreased fish abundance, species diversity and biomass, compared to areas subjected to low and medium levels of fishing. Similarly, Crampton (1999b) found that populations of discus in the Estação Ecológica Mamirauá in Brazil collapsed, apparently due to over-collection (Crampton, 1999b). Moreau & Coomes (2006) noted that little information was available on the status of silver arowana in South America, so it was difficult to determine whether or not the trade poses a threat to this species. In Guyana, illegal harvesting of Arapaima (Arapaima gigas) has led to huge reductions in its population (IWOKRAMA, 2007). In parts of the Amazon, local exporters have imposed closed season restrictions in some areas (Andrews, 1990).

The excessive or uncontrolled extraction of ornamental fish was considered by the Strategic Action Programme (SAP, 2000) to be a problem in all countries bordering Lake Tanganyika. Licensing programmes were rarely enforced; SAP (2000) suggested monitoring from the end market and using fees from export licences to pay for enforcement of legislation. By contrast, one of a limited number of exporters from Lake Tanganyika exported 100,000 wild-caught fish (mainly cichlids) each year, with no apparent impact on the local populations of fish in 20 years of operation (Andrews, 1990).


Ng & Tan (1997) noted the overexploitation of several species including the bala shark Balantiocheilos melanopterus, the pygmy loach Botia sidthimunki, and arowana Scleropages formosus. The bala shark was reported to have been abundant in Sumatra and Kalimantan, but overfishing effectively exterminated wild populations. Fortunately for these species, the majority of individuals entering the aquarium trade now originate from culture operations, which reduce or eliminate the need to capture wild fish (Ng & Tan, 1997). Kottelat & Whitten (1996) claimed there was no documented evidence that selective overfishing for the aquarium trade had caused populations to decline. For example, while some attributed declines in the red tail shark, Epalzeorhynchos bicolour, to overharvesting for the aquarium trade, others have suggested that alternative factors, in particular habitat modification, were responsible (Kottelat & Whitten, 1996). Clarke (2007a) reported on a newly discovered species found East of Inle Lake in Myanmar. The species, originally traded as Galaxy microrasbora or Celestial Pearl danio and recently named Danio margaritatus (Conway et al., 2008), faced the threat of being wiped out by the aquarium trade. The fish was first introduced into the hobby in September 2006, and was collected so heavily that six months after its discovery catches of the species were reported to be down to 30-50 fish per day and its habitat was destroyed by trampling. The Government of Myanmar banned exports of the species in February 2007 to allow assessment of conservation status and subsequently identified some new sites where the fish is still present (Clarke, 2007b).



The majority of trade in freshwater ornamental fish involves captive-bred specimens. The introduction of alien species has been considered a major problem (Craig, 1992; Dudgeon et al., 2006; Witte et al., 2000) as the farms very often breed species not native to the area in which they are located (Andrews, 1990). For example, a wide range of Central and South American, African and tropical Asian fishes are bred on ornamental fish farms in South East Asia, and South East US (Andrews, 1990). As these species are kept in outdoor ponds, there is a risk that they might escape to nearby water bodies, and establish populations. Accidental or intentional release by amateur hobbyists can also be problematic (Andrews, 1990). In 2006, there were 22 species of alien ornamental fish with established breeding populations in Australian waterways (Whittington & Chong, 2007). The translocation of species within a lake involves moving a species from one part of the lake to another, to stock that part of the lake. Translocations may be conducted to intentionally set up new breeding populations closer to the collector’s home base, or in other cases the fish fry escape from holding facilities and colonise new areas. Given the potential for competition and hybridisation with indigenous taxa, Genner et al. (2006) recommended that translocation should be avoided.



The disease risks associated with the trade in aquatic ornamental species have been poorly documented when compared to that for other commodities (Whittington & Chong, 2007). Whittington & Chong (2007) found that despite stringent Australian border controls, there had been many disease incursions as well as the establishment of significant exotic viral, bacterial, fungal, protozoal, and metazoan pathogens from ornamental fish in farmed native Australian fish and free-living introduced species. They suggested that the establishment of alien species in Australian waterways 21

provided a transmission pathway for the establishment of pathogens in native fishes (Whittington & Chong, 2007). Lal Tekriwal & Arunava Rao (1999) noted that disease was widespread among the fishes of the small-scale breeders of Calcutta.



The harvest and trade in freshwater ornamental species provides income to many communities in rural and urban (markets) areas, where other opportunities to generate income may be limited. If managed sustainably, the trade in freshwater ornamentals can support jobs and provide economic incentives for habitat conservation. This trade can also represent an important source of foreign exchange for national economies. Junk (1984b) noted that collection of ornamental fish in the Amazon provided a source of income for people who had little opportunity to earn money in other ways, and also generated foreign income. Chao (1992) estimated that eight to ten thousand Amazonians depended for subsistence on the income generated through the trade in ornamental species. Chao & Prang (1997) suggested that the trade contributed at least 60% of the income revenue in Barcelos (population 12,000). They further noted that the income generated through other extractive industries (e.g. rubber, Brazil nuts) had declined in this region, so that the ornamental fish trade was playing an increasingly important role. Moreau & Coomes (2007) estimated that close to 10,000 people in the Iquitos region of Peru were earning at least some income from collecting fishes for the trade. Although the economic impact on local communities in Peru was not known, Gerstner et al. (2006) estimated that 3000 families made a living from the trade and that 100,000 people benefited economically, often in villages where few other economic opportunities were available.



Extraction of ornamental fish is often done co-operatively; frequently in family groups, but also in community groups e.g. in Brazil (Chao & Prang, 1997) and in Peru (Moreau & Coomes, 2006). However, large export companies in the exporting centres such as Manaus in Brazil may preclude the opportunity for people in local communities to set up their own export companies. Exploitation of the Estação Ecológica Mamirauá in Brazil was initially (in 1990) undertaken by a fish-exporting company in Manaus that hired men from local commuities to provide manual labour and assist the harvest; however, in subsequent years, the same company exploited the resource using its own crew and did not employ local people (Crampton, 1999b). Crampton (1999b) suggested that cooperatives of local communities could be established to capture and store ornamental fish for sale to visiting boats from Manaus companies.



Most aquaculture of ornamental fish involves freshwater species and approximately 90% of freshwater ornamental fish are captive-bred (Tlusty, 2002). Ornamental fish are an important part of aquaculture production in some countries, notably Singapore and the US (Tlusty, 2002). Freshwater tropical ornamental fish culture is


the largest component of aquaculture in Florida and accounts for approximately 95% of all ornamentals produced in the US. There are about 200 Florida producers who collectively raise over 800 varieties of freshwater fishes (Hill & Yanong, 2006). Opinions differ on the benefits and risks of aquaculture of ornamental species. One argument is that aquaculture of ornamental fish can contribute towards the recovery of overexploited resources and species which may be in decline. For example, market demand for Scleropages formosus is currently met by captive-bred specimens, eliminating the demand from the wild of this endangered species (Tlusty, 2002). Captive breeding operations for threatened species such as S. formosus and Balantiocheilos melanopterus relieved the pressure on wild stocks, allowing the species to recover (Ng & Tan, 1997). Aquaculture often stimulates research and improved knowledge of species biology. It can lead to increased production efficiency and lower mortality during transport, particularly where the breeding facility is located close to an airport (Tlusty, 2002). Culture of ornamental fish tends to be undertaken in completely closed tanks or ponds, differing from much of the food aquaculture which very often utilizes the marine coastal environment (Tlusty, 2002). The environmental risks, including release of antibiotics or other pollution into the surrounding environment, may therefore be lower than in food production. One of the main arguments against aquaculture for ornamental species relates to the shift of economic benefits from the native range of a species to another area or country. Wild harvest can provide a reliable source of income generation for rural communities. However, aquaculture operations tend to be focused in developed areas where there is sufficient capital investment for the high cost of developing the necessary infrastructure (Tlusty, 2002). For example, the majority of Malawi cichlids are produced in Florida and Singapore, while the neon tetra is mostly supplied by Hong Kong SAR (Watson, 2000 cited by Tlusty, 2002). Numbers of neon tetra declined from 50% of the total Peruvian exports to about 14% as a result of successful breeding in South-East Asia (Junk, 1984b). Chao (1992) reported that the ornamental fish fishery of the Rio Negro in Brazil was diminishing as a result of competition from operations that breed tetras in Asia. He also noted that various strains of discus were bred in Asia, Europe and North America. The transfer of activity to concentrate around export centres, or to countries with lower labour costs, can have a negative effect on the economies of local people involved in the wild harvest and removes incentives for habitat conservation (Gerstner et al., 2006). Furthermore, Chao and Prang (1997) noted that captive breeding and marketing of endemic species outside the region may lead to the need for alternative forms of income generation that are environmentally destructive, such as mineral extraction and cattle raising, which may have serious social, economic and environmental repercussions. Banister (1980) emphasized the lack of captive breeding of freshwater ornamentals in range states, wasting the opportunity to generate income without depleting wild stocks. Brummet (2005) suggested that the development of aquaculture in West Africa could represent a viable alternative to wild harvest, particularly for valuable species. Tlusty (2002) considered aquaculture of ornamental species to be beneficial when species are difficult to obtain from the wild, breeding supports a conservation programme, and the breeding programme provides some environmental benefit or does not cause environmental damage. He recommended that aquaculture


production of ornamental species be avoided when it would replace harvest from the wild, and where that harvest maintains habitat or a cultural or economic benefit.



A range of initiatives to promote sustainable trade have been developed in many of the regions that export freshwater ornamental fish, particularly in South America. Responses to conservation concerns have involved activities such as certification and improvement of fishing practices (Lecchini et al., 2006). Project Piaba was established to promote an economically viable fishery for the riverine communities of the middle Rio Negro in Brazil and an ecologically sustainable resource for the aquarium industry (Chao & Prang, 1997). This project is conducting research on the diversity, abundance and distribution of ornamental species with a view to: establishing fishery management strategies; looking at ways in which fish husbandry techniques and captive breeding could be improved; providing environmental education; creating community-based fisheries management strategies; and liaising with the regulatory bodies in Brazil to provide advice on monitoring and inspection of stocks, fisheries management and export policy (Chao & Prang, 1997). The Zoological Society of London is working with Sociedade Civil Mamirauá to develop a pilot project in the Mamirauá and Amaná Sustainable Development Reserves, which aims to establish best practice guidelines for a certification system within Amazonian regions, allowing improved control of the trade in ornamental fish. It is hoped that this will result in direct economic benefits to the rural community and that the monetary value, along with the establishment of a sustainable system, will ensure the long-term protection of fish diversity within the reserve. In Guyana, an organisation called Iwokrama is working in partnership with the North Rupununi District Development Board on a sustainable, community-based aquarium fisheries business in the Rupununi Wetlands. The project is designed to generate revenue for indigenous communities and benefits from the area's extraordinarily high fish diversity. Management protocols to ensure local ecological and social sustainability have been implemented. Iwokrama hopes to influence South America's aquarium trade by introducing a certified 'green equity' trade, resulting in regulation of the presently unregulated industry. The World Fish Centre is currently working on a project to improve local incomes and encourage sustainable exploitation of the Lower Guinea rainforest rivers of southern Cameroon. In the Isla Verde in Peru, villagers can deny outsider access to the 36 lakes of the reserve, and a quota for arowana is allocated to the villagers in exchange for monitoring and guarding duties (Moreau & Coomes, 2006). Although ornamental fish are not specifically mentioned by the FAO Code of Conduct, they are considered to be covered by the same guidelines. The Ornamental Aquatic Trade Association (OATA) has produced a Code of Conduct for the aquarium industry in the United Kingdom 4 (Bartley, 2000). The code includes three main sections: guidelines on various aspects of trade in livestock and health and safety; water quality criteria; and a customer charter.
4 24



The aquarium trade can provide the opportunity to educate the public about fishrelated environmental issues and increase awareness and understanding of what is often perceived as a hidden ecosystem (Andrews, 1990; Wabnitz et al., 2003). Some conservation and/or sustainable trade initiatives have incorporated public education into their programmes. For example, Project Piaba in Brazil and Iwokrama in Guyana have been involved in outreach programmes, engaging with the local communities and providing environmental education. Others, such as ZSL (2006), are carrying out research on the Brazilian and UK markets to assess whether trade in sustainably sourced fish is economically viable.


Ababouch, L. 2006. Assuring fish safety and quality in international fish trade. Marine Pollution Bulletin 53 (10-12): 561-568 Abdallah, M. 2000. Current status of ornamental fish trade. Regional Organisation for the Conservation of the Environment of the Red Sea and the Gulf of Aden (PERSGA), Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Cited by: Wood, E.M. 2001. Collection of Coral Reef Fish for Aquaria: Global Trade, Conservation Issues and Management Strategies. Marine Conservation Society, UK. Adams, C.M., Larkin, S.L. & Lee, D.J. 2001a. Volume and Value of Marine Ornamentals Collected in Florida, 1990-98. Aquarium Sciences and Conservation 3(1): 25-36 Adams, C.M., Larkin, S.L., Degner, R.L., Lee, D.J. & Milon, J.W. 2001b. International Trade in Live, Ornamental “Fish” in the U.S. and Florida. University of Florida, Florida, USA Aguilar, F. 1992. Costa Rican coral reefs: impacts from commercial fishing. Proceedings of the Seventh International Coral Reef Symposium. Abstracts. Albaladejo, V. D., and Corpuz, V. T. 1984. Marine aquarium fish research and resource management. Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic resources, Republic of the Philippines. Allen, G. & Steene, R.C. 1995. Notes on the ecology and behavior of the Indonesian cardinalfish (Apogonidae) Pterapogon kauderni Koumans. Revue française d'aquariologie, 22 (1-2): 7-9. Almenara-Roldan, S. and Ketchum, J.T. 1994. Forgotten islands of the Mexican Pacific. OFI Journal 9. pp 12-14. Amaral, A.C.Z. & Jablonski, S. 2005. Conservation of Marine and Coastal Biodiversity in Brazil. Conservation Biology 19(3): 625-631 Ammendrup, S. 1999. Animal health conditions for trade within and import into the European Union of live animals and animal products. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica (Supplement) 91: 21-23 Andrews, C. 1990. The ornamental fish trade and fish conservation. Journal of Fish Biology, 37: 53-59. Anon, 2002. The United States consumption of ornamental fish: a preliminary analysis of import data. World Resources Institute NOAA Final Report. 47p. cited by Bruckner, 2005. Anon, 2007a Notification No. 2007/022. Amendments to Appendices I and II of the Convention adopted by the Conference of the Parties at its 14th meeting, The Hague (Netherlands), 3-15 June 2007. Anon, 2007b CoP14 Prop. 19. Fourteenth meeting of the Conference of the Parties The Hague (Netherlands), 3-15 June 2007 consideration of proposals for amendment of Appendices I and II. Anon, 2005. Executive Board Member: Rick Datodi. OFI Journal 48: 74-77 Anon, 2007. CoP14 Prop. 19 Proposal to list Banggai cardinalfish (Pterapogon kauderni) on Appendix II. Fourteenth meeting of the Conference of the Parties of CITES, The Hague (Netherlands), 3-15 June 2007. Accessed in March 2007. URL: APPMA, 2008. National Pet Owners Survey. American Pet Products Manufacturer Association. Greenwich, CT, US.


Australian Government Department of the Environment and Heritage. 2005. Assessment of the Queensland Marine Aquarium Fish Fishery, Oct 2005, 24pp. URL: Accessed: July 2007 Axelrod, H.R. 2001. Discovery of the Cardinal Tetra and beyond. In Chao, N. Petry, P. Prang, G. Sonnieschien, L. Tlusty, M. (eds.) Conservation and Management of Ornamental Fish Resources of the Rio Negro Basin, Amazonia, Brazil – Project Piaba.Proceedings of the International Workshop on “Amazon River Biodiversity”. March 22-26 1999. St. Louis Children’s Aquarium. St. Louis, Missouri, USA. Pp 17-26. Banister, K. 1980. Ornamental fish trade. Paper given at SAA meeting, 4th June 1980. Aquarium Fish Info. Baquero, J. 1999. Marine ornamentals trade: quality and sustainability for the Pacific region. Trade and Investment Division, South Pacific Forum Secretariat and the Marine Aquarium Council, Suva, Fiji. Barber, C. V., and Pratt, V. R. 1997. Sullied Seas: Strategies for combating cyanide fishing in Southeast Asia and Beyond. World Resources Institute and International Marinelife Alliance- Philippines, Washington D.C. Barham, B.L., Coomes, O.T. & Takasaki, Y. 1999. Rain forest livelihoods: income generation, household wealth and forest use. Unasylva, 198(50): 34-42. Barratt, L. & Medley, P. 1990. Managing multi-species ornamental reef fisheries. Progress Underwater Science 15:55-72. Bartley & Subasinghe. 1996. Historical aspects of international movement of living aquatic species. Revue Scientifique at Technique, 15(2):387-400. Bartley, D. 2000 Responsible Ornamental Fisheries. FAO Aquaculture Newsletter, 24:10. Basleer, G. 1994. The international trade in aquarium/ornamental fish. Infofish International. 5/94 pp 15-17. Basleer, G. 1995. The international trade in ornamental fish. Aquaculture towards the 21st century. Eds KPP Nambiar and T Singh. Infofish, Malaysia. Pp 241-243. Beazley, M. 1993. Wetlands in Danger. Reed International Books Limited. Bell, J.D., Lane, I., Gervis, M., Soule, S. & Tafea, H. 1997. Village-based farming of the giant clam, Tridacna gigas (L.), for the aquarium market: Initial trials in Solomon Islands. Aquaculture Research 28(2): 121-128 Bertram, I. (1996) The aquarium fishery in the Cook Islands. Is there a need for management? SPC Live Reef Fish Information Bulletin 1, 10–12. Bertram, I. 1996. The aquarium fishery in the Cook Islands. Is there a need for management? SPC Live ReefFish Information Bulletin 1:10–12. Blasiola, G.C. 1988. Rapport de la mission chargée d’enquêter sur l’impact du cyanure aux Philippines. Revue Francais Aquariologie 15: 126-128. Cited by Lecchini et al., 2006. Boggiatto, K., & Reiser, A. 2004. The Marine Aquarium Trade in the Western Hemisphere and the Indo-Pacific region. Hawaii Adubon Society. 49pp. Bolton, T.F. & Graham, W.M. 2006. Jellyfish on the Rocks: Bioinvasion Threat of the International Trade in Aquarium Live Rock. Biological Invasions 8(4): 651-653 Bondad-Reantaso, M.G., Subasinghe, R.P., Arthur, J.R., Ogawa, K., Chinabut, S., Adlard, R., Tan, Z. & Shariff, M. 2005. Disease and health management in Asian aquaculture. Veterinary Parasitology 132(3-4): 249-272 Bruckner, A.W. 2005. The importance of the marine ornamental reef fish trade in the wider Caribbean. Revista de Biologia Tropical 53 (SUPPL. 1): 127-137


Brummet, R.E. 2005. Ornamental fishes: a sustainable livelihoods option for rainforest communities. FAO Aquaculture Newsletter, 33: 29-34. Bruton, M.N. 1995. Have fishes had their chips? The dilemma of threatened fishes. Environmental Biology of Fishes 43(1): 1-27 Calado, R. 2006. Marine ornamental species from European waters: A valuable overlooked resource or a future threat for the conservation of marine ecosystems? Scientia Marina 70(3): 389-398 Cam, R., Duggan, I.C., Bergeron, N.M.N., Ricciardi, A. & Macisaac, H.J. 2005. Invasion risks posed by the aquarium trade and live fish markets on the Laurentian Great Lakes. Biodiversity and Conservation, 14(6): 1365-1381. Chan T., & Sadovy, Y. 1998. Profile of the marine aquarium fish trade in Hong Kong. Aquarium Sciences and Conservation 2: 197-213. Chan, T.T. & Sadovy, Y. 2000. Profile of the Marine Aquarium Fish Trade in Hong Kong. Aquarium Sciences and Conservation 2(4): 197-213 Chao, N.L. & Prang, G. 1997. Project Piaba - towards a sustainable ornamental fishery in the Amazon. Aquarium Sciences and Conservation, 1: 105-111. Chao, N.L. 1992. Diversity and conservation of ornamental fishes - the gems from flooded forests in Amazonia. Canadian Biodiversity, 2 (2): 2-7. Chao, N.L. 1993. Conservation of Rio Negro ornamental fishes. Tropical Fish Hobbyist 41 (5): 99-114. Chao, N.L. 2001. Fisheries, diversity and conservation of ornamental fish of the Rio Negro River, Brazil - a review of Project Piaba (1989-99). In Chao, N. Petry, P. Prang, G. Sonnieschien, L. Tlusty, M. (eds.) Conservation and Management of Ornamental Fish Resources of the Rio Negro Basin, Amazonia, Brasil – Project Piaba. University of Amazonas Press, Manaus, Brazil. Pp. 161-204. Cheong, L. 1996. Overview of the current international trade in ornamental fish, with special reference to Singapore. Revue Scientifique et Technique de l’Office International des Epizooties, 15(2): 445-481. Chiappone M., Miller S.L. & Swanson D.W. 2001. Condylactis gigantea - A giant comes under pressure from the aquarium trade in Florida. Reef Encounter 30: 29-31 Chou, LM; Tuan, VS; Yeemin, T; Cabanban, A; Suharsono; Kessna, I. 2002. Status of Southeast Asia coral reefs. Status of coral reefs of the World: pp. 123-152. Clarke, M. 2007a. Galaxy rasbora under threat. Practical fishkeeping. accessed 11/07/2007. Clarke, M. 2007b. New populations of Celestichthys discovered. Practical fishkeeping. Accessed 12/05/2008. Clarke, P.J., Komatsu, T., Bell, J.D., Lasi, F., Oengpepa, C.P. & Leqata, J. 2003. Combined culture of Trochus niloticus and giant clams (Tridacnidae): Benefits for restocking and farming. Aquaculture 215(39173): 123-144 Claydon, J. 2005. Spawning aggregations of coral reef fishes: Characteristics, hypotheses, threats and management. Oceanography and Marine Biology 42: 265-301 Conroy, D.A. 1975. An evaluation of the present state of world trade in ornamental fishes. FAO, Rome, Italy. Conroy, D.A. 1977. Evaluation of the Present State of World Trade in Ornamental Fish. Copeia, Vol. 1977, No. 2. pp. 410-411.


Conway, KW, Chen W-J & RL Mayden (2008) - The "Celestial pearl danio" is a miniature Danio (s.s) (Ostariophysi: Cyprinidae): evidence from morphology and molecules. Zootaxa 1686: 1–28. Copp, G.H., Wesley, K.J. & Vilizzi, L. 2005. Pathways of ornamental and aquarium fish introductions into urban ponds of Epping Forest (London, England): the human vector. Journal of Applied Ichthyology 21(4): 263-274 Corbin, J.S. 2001. Marine Ornamentals '99, Conference Highlights and Priority Recommendations. Aquarium Sciences and Conservation 3(1): 3-11 Côté, I.M. 2000. Evolution and ecology of cleaning symbioses in the sea. In: Gibson R.N. and Barnes M. (eds), Oceanography and Marine Biology: An Annual Review. Taylor and Francis, London, pp. 311–355. Cowx, I.G. 2002. Analysis of threats to freshwater fish conservation: past and present challenges. In M.J. Collares-Pereira, M.M. Coelho & I.G. Cowx (Eds.) Conservation of freshwater fishes: options for the future. Fishing News Books, Blackwell Science Ltd. Cowx, I.G., Almeida, O., Bene, C., Brummet, R., Bush, S., Darwall, W., Pittock, J. & van Brakel, M. 2004. Value of river fisheries. In: Welcomme, R.L. & Petr, T. (eds.) Proceedings of the second international symposium on the management of large rivers for fisheries. 11-14th February, 2003, Phnom Penh, Kingdom of Cambodia. Vol 1. Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific, Bangkok, Thailand. RAP Publication 2004/16, pp. 357. Craig, J.F. 1992. Human induced changes in the composition of fish communities in the African Great Lakes. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, 2: 93-124. Crampton, W.G.R. 1999a. The Impact of the Ornamental Fish Trade on the Discus Symphysodon aequifasciatus. Advances in Economic Botany 13: 29-44 Crampton, W.G.R. 1999b. The impact of the ornamental fish trade on the discus Symphysodon aequifasiatus: A case study from the floodplain forests of Estacao Ecologica Mamiraua. In: C. Padoch, J.M. Ayres, M. Pinedo-Vasquez & A. Henderson. (eds) Varzea: Diversity, Development and Conservation of Amazonia's Whitewater Floodplains. New York Botanical Garden Press. New York. Pp. 2944. Cruz, F.P.2001. Supplying the demand for sustainability: stories from the field: Marine Ornamentals, Collection, Culture and Conservation. Nov.26-Dec.1, 2001. Lake Buena Vista, Florida, USA. p.13-14. Cuartas, Méndez Diana & Perdomo – Sabogal, Álvaro, 2006. Feeding and reproducive ecology of Xiphophorus helleri (Pisces: Poeciliidae) from a natural stream, Colombia. OFI Journal, 51: 12-17. Daelman, W. 1996. [Animal health and the trade in aquatic animals within and to the European Union]. Revue Scientifique et Technique de l’Office International des Epizooties 15(2): 711-722 Darwall, W. Smith, K., Lowe, T., & Vie, J.-C. 2005. The status and distribution of freshwater biodiversity in Eastern Africa. Occassional Paper of the IUCN Species Survival Commission No. 31. Davenport, K. 2005. The Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD). OFI Journal 48: 58-61 Davenport, K.E. 1996. Characteristics of the current international trade in ornamental fish, with special reference to the European Union. Revue Scientifique et Technique de l’Office International des Epizooties 15(2): 435-443


Daw, T.M., Rogers, G.C.C., Mapson, P. & Kynoch, J.E. 2001. Structure and Management Issues of the Emerging Ornamental Fish Trade In Eritrea. Aquarium Sciences and Conservation 3(1-3): 53-64 Daw, T.M., V.C.C. Rogers, P. Mapson and J.E. Kynoch. 1998. Reefs of Massawa Expedition 1997: Final Report. 99pp. Dawes, J. 2002. Wild-caught marine species and the ornamental aquatic industry – part 2. OFI Journal 40: 6-8 Dawes, J. 2005. Australi bans imports of panther grouper. OFI Journal 48: 115. Dawes, J. 2007. Column John Dawes: CITES and the Banggai Cardinal. OFI Journal 54: 7-9 Dawes, J. 2007. Column John Dawes: CITES and the Banggai Cardinal. OFI Journal 54: 7-9Daelman, W. 1996. [Animal health and the trade in aquatic animals within and to the European Union]. Revue Scientifique et Technique de l’Office International des Epizooties 15(2): 711-722 Doyle, K.A., Beers, P.T. & Wilson, D.W. 1996. Quarantine of aquatic animals in Australia. Revue Scientifique et Technique de l’Office International des Epizooties 15(2): 659-673 Dudgeon, H. Arthington, A. H, Gessner, M.O., Kawabata, Z.-I., Knowler, D.J., Lévêque, C, Naiman, R.J., Prieur-Richard, A.-H., Soto, D., Stiassny, M.L.J., & Sullivan, C.A. 2006. Freshwater biodiversity: importance, threats, status and conservation challenges. Biologocial Reviews, 81: 163-182. Dufour, V. J-Y Jouvenel, C. Lo. 1999. Collecting marine fish and invertebrate larvae: a sustainable technology. First International Conference of Marine Ornamentals. Hawaii. Abstracts. Edwards, A. & Shepherd, A. 1992. Environmental implications of aquarium-fish collection in the Maldives, with proposals for regulation. Environmental Conservation 19(1): 61-72 Ekaratne, S.U.K. 2000. A Review of the Status and Trends of Exported Ornamental Fish Resources and Their Habitats in Sri Lanka - BOBP/REP/88. URL: Date accessed: 29/05/07 Erdmann, M.V. 1999. Clove-oil: an ‘eco-friendly’ alternative to cyanide use in the live reef fish industry? SPC Live Reef Fish Information Bulletin 5:4-7 FAO 2007. State of World Fisheries and Aquculture 2006. Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations, Rome. FAO newsletters: URL: =*FAN*&sortorder=5&form_c=AND Accessed July 2007. FAO. 1999. Ornamental aquatic life: What's FAO got to do with it? URL: Date accessed: 29/05/07 Ferreira, C.E.L. 2004. Trophic structure patterns of Brazilian reef fishes: a latitudinal comparison. Journal of Biogeography 31(7): 1093–1106 Floeter, S R., Halpern, B.S. & Ferreira, C.E.L. 2006. Effects of fishing and protection on Brazilian reef fishes. Biological Conservation 128(3): 391-402 Fossa, S.A. 2005. Twenty-five years of OFI: Fighting for the advancement of our industry. OFI Journal 48: 5-9 Gasparini, J., Floeter, S., Ferreira, C. & Sazima, I. 2005. Marine Ornamental Trade in Brazil. Biodiversity and Conservation 14(12): 2883-2899 Genner, M.J., Botha, A. & Turner, G.F. 2006. Translocations of rocky habitat cichlid fishes to Nkhata Bay, Lake Malawi. Journal of Fish Biology, 69(2): 622-628.


Gerstner, C.L., Ortega, H., Sanchez, H. & Graham, D.L. 2006. Effects of the freshwater aquarium trade on wild fish populations in differentially fished areas of the Peruvian Amazon. Journal of Fish Biology, 68(3): 862-875 Giles, B., Ky, T., Hoang, D. & Vincent, A. 2006. The catch and trade of seahorses in Vietnam. Biodiversity and Conservation 15(8): 2497-2513 Gomez, E.D. & Mingoa-Licuanan, S.S. 2006. Achievements and lessons learned in restocking giant clams in the Philippines. Fisheries Research 80(1): 46-52 Gössling, S., Kunke, T., Schumacher, K. & Zilger, M. 2004. Use of molluscs, fish, and other marine taxa by tourism in Zanzibar, Tanzania. Biodiversity and Conservation 13(14): 2623-2639 Gouveia, L., Rema, P., Pereira, O. & Empis, J. 2003. Couldouring ornamental fish (Cyprinus carpio and Carassius auratus) with microalgal biomass. Aquaculture Nutrition, 9: 123-129. Graham, T. 1996. Managing Palau’s aquarium fishery. SPC Live Reef Fish Information Bulletin 1: 13-18. Greer, D. & Harvey, B. 2004. Case study 1. The law of unintended consequences: Conserving the ornamental fish industry in Barcelos, Brazil. In: Greer, D. & Harvey, B. Blue Genes: Sharing and conserving for the world's aquatic biodiversity. IDRC, Ottawa, Canada. URL: Accessed: 29/05/07. Hanawa, M.L., L.Harris, M. Graham, A.P.Farrell and L.I. Bendell-Young. 1998. Effects of cyanide exposure on Dascyllus aruanus, a tropical marine fish species: lethality, anaesthesia and physiological effects. Aquarium Sciences and Conservation 2: 21-34. Hardin, M. & Legore, R. 2005. Development of management policy for the marine ornamental fish and invertebrate fishery in Puerto Rico: A case study. Revista de Biologia Tropical 53: 139-144 Hastein, 1996. Preparation and applications of the International Aquatic Animal Health Code and Diagnostic Manual for Aquatic Animal Diseases of the Office International des Epizooties, Revue Scientifique et Technique, 15(2):72331. Hedrick, R.P. 1996. Movement of pathogens with the international trade of live fish: problems and solutions. Revue Scientifique et Technique de l’Office International des Epizooties 15(2): 523-531 Henley, G. 1984. US imports millions of ornamental fish annually. TRAFFIC, 5(1): 1820. Cited by Andrews, 1990. Hill, B.J. 2005. The need for effective disease control in international aquaculture. Developmental Biology (Basel) 121: 3-12 Hill, J.E. & Yanong, R.P.E. 2006. Freshwater Ornamental Fish Commonly Cultured in Florida. Circular 54, Technical report, University of Florida. URL: Date accessed: 29/05/07 Holthus, P. 2002. MAC certification now available to the marine ornamental industry. OFI Journal 38: 10-11 Holthus, P. 2005. Thinking globally and acting locally - Progress by marine ornamentals colectors, communities and companies towards a sustainable trade through MAC certification. OFI Journal 48: 82-89 Hughes, T.P. 2003. Climate Change, Human Impacts, and the Resilience of Coral Reefs. Science, 301 (5635): 929 Huntingford, F.A., Adams, C., Braithwaite, V.A., Kadri, S., Pottinger, T.G., Sandoe, P. & Turnbull, J.F. 2006. Current issues in fish welfare. Journal of Fish Biology 68(2): 332-372 31

IUCN. 2007. The status and distribution of freshwater fished in the aquarium trade from the Mediterranean basin and eastern, western and southern Africa. Report compiled by Smith, K.G. and W.R.T Darwall, IUCN Freshwater Biodiversity Unit. IWOKRAMA, 2007. Aquarium Fishery Project. URL: accessed 27/07/2007. Job, S.D., Do, H.H., Meeuwig, J.J. & Hall, H.J. 2002. Culturing the oceanic seahorse, Hippocampus kuda. Aquaculture 214(39173): 333-341 Jones, R.J. 1997. Effects of cyanide on coral. SPC Live Reef Fish Information Bulletin 3: 38 Junk, W.J. 1984a. Ecology of the várzea, floodplain of Amazonian white-water rivers. In: H. Sioli (ed.) The Amazon: Limnology and Landscape Ecology of a Mighty Tropical River and its Basin. Dr W. Junk Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands. Pp. 215-243. Junk, W.J. 1984b. Ecology, fisheries and fish culture in Amazonia. In: H. Sioli (ed.) The Amazon: Limnology and Landscape Ecology of a Mighty Tropical River and its Basin. Dr W. Junk Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands. Pp. 443476. Junk, W.J., Mota Soares, M.G. & Bayley, P.B. 2007. Freshwater fishes of the Amazon River basin: their biodiversity, fisheries, and habitats. Aquatic Ecosystem Health & Management, 10(2): 153 – 173. Kailola, P.J. 2004. Risk assessment of ten species of ornamental fish under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999. Department of the Environment and Water Resources, Australia Kemp, J. & Klaus, R. 2006. Sudan Marine Parks Survey Expedition 2006: Dungonab Bay and Mukkawar Island National Park & Sanganeb Atoll Marine National Park, Sudan. Volume II: Appendices. African Parks Foundation, York & Oxford, UK. Kolm, N. & Berglund, A. 2003. Wild Populations of a Reef Fish Suffer from the "Nondestructive" Aquarium Trade Fishery. Conservation Biology 17(3): 910-914 Kolm, N. 2004. The Banggai cardinalfish: A novel model organism in evolutionary biology. OFI Journal 45: 8-10 Kottelat, M. & Whitten, T. 1996. Frestwater biodiversity in Asia with specieal reference to fish. World Bank Technical Paper no. 343. The World Bank, Washington DC. Kronen, M., Sauni, S., Sauni, L.F. & Vunisea, A. 2006. A socioeconomic perspective on the live reef fish food trade for small-scale artisanal fishers based on case studies from the Pacific. SPC Live Reef Fish Information Bulletin 16: 33-37. URL: Date accessed: July 2007 Kvist, L.P. Gram,. S. Cacares, C.A. & Ore, B.I. 2001. Socio-economy of flood plain households in the Peruvian Amazon. Forest Ecology and Management 150: 175186. Lal Tekriwal, K. & Arunava Rao, A. 1999. Ornamental Aquarium Fish of India. Kingdom Books, England. Landau, M. 1992. Introduction to aquaculture. New York. 440 pp. Cited by Tlusty, 2002. Larkin, S.L. & Degner, R.L. 2001. The U.S. Wholesale Market for Marine Ornamentals. Aquarium Sciences and Conservation 3(1): 13-24 Larkin, S.L., Adams, C.M., Degner, R.L., Lee, D.J. & Milon, J.W. 2001. An Economic Profile of Florida's Marine Life Industry. Food and Resource Economics


Department, Institute Of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, USA. Cited by Boggiatto & Reiser, 2004. Le Cren, E.D. 1990. Rare fishes and their conservation: a brief introduction to the symposium. Journal of Fish Biology 37(supplement a): 1-3 Lecchini D., Polty S., Nakamura Y., Mosconi P., Tsuchiya M. 2006. New perspectives on aquarium fish trade. Fisheries Science, 72: pp 40-47. LeGore, R.S., Hardin, M.P. & Ter-Ghazaryan, D. 2005. Organization and operation of the marine ornamental fish and invertebrate export fishery in Puerto Rico. Revista de Biología Tropical 53(Suppl.1) Leite, R.G. & Zuanon, J.A. 1993. Piexes ornamentais - Aspectos de comercializacao ecologia, legislacao e propostas de acoes para um melhor aproveitamento. In A.l. Val, R. Figliuolo & E. Feldberg (eds). Bases cientificas para estrategias de preservacao e desenvolvimento da Amazonia: Fatos e perspectives. INPA, Manaus, Brazil. Pp. 327-332. Cited by Crampton, 1999b. Lewbart, G.A., Stoskopf, M.K., Losordo, T., Geyer, J., Owen, J., Smith, D.W., Law, M., & Altier, C. 1999. Safety and efficacy of the Environmental Products Group Masterflow Aquarium Management System with Aegis Microbe Shield. Aquacultural Engineering 19: 93-98 Lieberman, S. and Field, J. 2001. Global Solutions to Global Trade Impacts? Global Trade and Consumer Choices: Coral Reefs in Crisis. p. 19-24. Papers Presented at a Symposium held at the 2001 Annual Meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, San Francisco, California. Ligvoet, W. & Witte, F. 1991. Perturbation through predator introduction: effects on the food web and fish yields in Lake Victoria (East Africa). In Ravera, O. (ed.) Terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems: perturbation and recovery. Ellis Horwood, London, UK Lim, L.C., Dhert, P. & Sorgeloos, P. 2003. Recent developments and improvements in ornamental fish packaging systems for air transport. Aquaculture Research 34(11): 923-935 Lin, J., Sparsis, M. & Hagood, R.W. 2001. Growing Giant Clam (Tridacna Derasa) in Aquaculture Effluent. Aquarium Sciences and Conservation 3(1): 225-230 Linden, O., Souter, D., Wilhelmsson, D. & Obura, D. (eds) 2002. Coral Reef Degradation in the Indian Ocean: Status Report 2002. Department of Biology and Environmental Science, Sweden Lowe-Mcconnell, R.H. 1990. Summary address: rare fish, problems, progress and prospects for conservation. Journal of Fish Biology 37(sa): 263-269 Lubbock, H.R. & Polunin, N.V.C. 1975. Conservation and the tropical marine aquarium trade. Environmental Conservation 2(3): 229-232 Lung'ayia, H., Sitoki, L. & Kenyanya, M. 2001. The nutrient enrichment of Lake Victoria (Kenyan waters). Hydrobiologia, 458(1-3): 75-82. Lunn, K.E. & Moreau, M.A. 2004. Unmonitored trade in marine ornamental fishes: the case of Indonesia’s Banggai cardinalfish (Pterapogon kauderni). Coral Reefs 23(3): 344-351 Macfadyen, G. 2004. Trade Issues Background Paper: Ethical/ Social/ Eco Certification, Labelling and Guidelines. Project PR 26109. FAO: Rome, Italy. MAF Biosecurity Authority. 2001. Standard 154.02.06: Transitional Facilities For Ornamental fish and Marine Invertebrates. Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, Biosecurity Authority, New Zealand. Mak, K.K., Yanase, H. & Renneberg, R. 2005. Cyanide fishing and cyanide detection in coral reef fish using chemical tests and biosensors. Biosensors and Bioelectronics 20(12): 2581-2593 33

Martin-Smith, K. & Vincent, A. 2006. Exploitation and trade of Australian seahorses, pipehorses, sea dragons and pipefishes (Family Syngnathidae). Oryx 40(2): 141-151 Matoto, S., Ledua, E., Mou-Tham, G., Kulbicki, M. & Dalzell, P. 1996. 1. The aquariumfish fishery in Tongatapu, Tonga. Status and recommendation for management. Noumea, New Caledonia. URL: Date accessed: 09/07/07 McAllister, D.E. 1999. Is mariculture the remedy to problems of coral reefs of coastal communities? SPC Live Reef Information Bulletin 5: 47-48. McClanahan, T.R. 2002. The near future of coral reefs. Environmental Conservation 29(4): 460-483. McGrath, D.G. 1990. Preliminary investigation of the trade in extractive products in the Brazilian Amazon. Final report submitted to the World Wildlife Fun –US. WWF, Washington DC. Cited by Crampton, 1999b. McPherson, J.M. & Vincent, A.C.J. 2004. Assessing East African trade in seahorse species as a basis for conservation under international controls. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 14(5): 521-538 Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, 2005. Ecosystems and human well-being: wetlands and water synthesis. World Resources Institute, Washington, D.C. MINTEL 1988. Water gardens and aquaria. Leisure Intelligence, 1: 5.1-5.31. Moe, M.A. 1999. Marine ornamental aquaculture. First International Conference of Marine Ornamentals. Hawaii. Mölsä, H., Reynolds, J.E., Coenen, E.J. & Lindqvist, O.V. 1999. Fisheries Research towards resource management on Lake Tanganyika. Hydrobiologia, 407: 1-24 Monteiro-Neto, C., de Andrade Cunha, F.E., Carvalho Nottingham, M., Araújo, M.E., Lucena Rosa, I. & Leite Barros, G.M. 2003. Analysis of the marine ornamental fish trade at Ceará State, northeast Brazil. Biodiversity and Conservation 12(6): 1287-1295 Moreau, M.-A. & Coomes, O.T. 2006. Potential threat of the international aquarium fish trade to silver arowana Osteoglossum bicirrhosum in the Peruvian Amazon. Oryx, 40: 152-160. Moreau, M.-A. & Coomes, O.T. 2007. Aquarium fish exploitation in western Amazonia: conservation issues in Peru. Environmental Conservation, 34(1): 1222. NABARD. 2007. Ornamental Fisheries. Technical report. National Bank for Agriculture and Rural development. URL: Date accessed: 29/05/07. Ng, P.K.L. & Tan, H.H. 1997. Freshwater fishes of Southeast Asia: potential for the aquarium fish trade and conservation issues. Aquarium Sciences and Conservation, 1: 79-90. Nottingham, M.C., Cunha, F.E.A. & Monteiro-Neto, C. 2000. Captura de peixes ornamentais marinhos no Estado do Ceará. Arquivos de Ciencias do Mar 33: 119-124. Noyes, J.C. 1976. Collecting without drugs. Marine Aquarist 6(7): 5-12. Ogawa, T. & Brown, C.L. 2001. Ornamental Reef Fish Aquaculture and Collection in Hawaii. Aquarium Sciences and Conservation 3(1): 151-169 Olden, J.D., Hogan, Z.S. & Vander Zanden, M.J. 2007 Small fish, big fish, red fish, blue fish: Size-biased extinction risk of the world’s freshwater and marine fishes. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 16(6): 694-701. 34

Olivier, K. 2001. FAO/Globefish Research Programme, Vol. 67. United Nations Food and Agriculture Organisation, Rome, Italy. Olivotto, I., Zenobi, A., Rollo, A., Migliarini, B., Avella, M. & Carnevali, O. 2005. Breeding, rearing and feeding studies in the cleaner goby Gobiosoma evelynae. Aquaculture 250(39114): 175-182 Olivotto, I.; Cardinali, M.; Barbaresi, L.; Maradonna, F. & Carnevali, O. 2003. Coral reef fish breeding: the secrets of each species. Aquaculture 224(1-4): 69-78 Ostrowski, A.C. & Laidley, C.W. 2001. Application of Marine Foodfish Techniques in Marine Ornamental Aquaculture: Reproduction and Larval First Feeding. Aquarium Sciences and Conservation 3(1):191-204 Parenti, L.R. & Soeroto, B. 2004. Adrianichthys roseni and Oryzias nebulosus, two new ricefishes (Atherinomorpha: Beloniformes: Adrianichthyidae) from Lake Poso, Sulawesi, Indonesia. Ichthyological Research 51(1): 10-19 Passfield, K. & Evans, J. 1991. Aquarium fish. Marine Resources Profile No 7. Rarotonga, Cook Islands: Ministry of Marine Resources. Perino, L. 1990. Assessment of the feasibility of establishing an aquarium fish industry in Papua New Guinea. FFA Report, no. 90/30. 35pp. Honiara, Solomon Islands: South Pacific Forum Fisheries Agency. Pfeffer, R. A., and Tribble, G. W. 1985. Hurricane effects on an aquarium fish fishery in the Hawaiian Islands. Proeedings 5th Inernational Coral Reef Symposium, Tahiti 3:331-336. Pomeroy R.S. and Balboa C. 2004. The Financial Feasibility of Small-Scale Marine Ornamental Aquaculture in the Philippines. Asian Fisheries Science 17 : 365376. Pyle, R. L. 1993. Marine aquarium fish. pp. 135-176, In A. Wright and L. Hill, L. (eds), Nearshore Marine Resources of the South Pacific. Information for fisheries development and management. Institute of Pacific Studies, Suva, Fiji and Forum Fisheries Agency, Honiara, Solomon Islands. 710 p. QFMA (Queensland Fisheries Management Authority). 1999. Discussion Paper 10. Queensland. Rajapakse, M. 1998. The ornamental aquatic industry in Sri Lanka. Opening address at the OFI Conference held at Interzoo '98, Nurnberg - 15 May, 1998. Rajasuriya, A., M.C. Öhman & R.W. Johnstone. 1998. Coral and sandstone reefhabitats in southern Sri Lanka: patterns in the distribution of coral communities. Ambio 27: 726–728. Rana, K. 2004. Global trade in ornamental fish. OFI Journal 45: 28-31 Randall, J.E. 1987. Collecting reef fishes for aquaria. In: B. Salvat (ed.) Human Impacts on Coral Reefs: Facts and Recommendations: facts and recommendations. Antenne Museum Ecoloe Pratigue des Hautes Etudes, Moorea, French Polynesia. Pp. 29-39 Ravera, O. (ed.) 1991. Terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems: perturbation and recovery. Ellis Horwood, London, UK Ready, J.S., Ferreira, E.J.G. & Kullander, S.O. 2006. Discus fishes: mitochondrial evidence for a phylogeographic barrier in the Amazonian genus Symphysodon (Teleostei: Cichlidae). Journal of Fish Biology, 69 (Supplement B): 200-211. Reynolds, J.D., Dulvy, N.K., Goodwin, N.B. & Hutchings, J.A. 2005. Biology of extinction risk in marine fishes. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Biological Sciences, 272 (1579) : 2337-2344. Rinkevich, B. 1996. Do reproduction and regeneration in damaged corals compete for energy allocation? Marine Ecology Progress Series 143(39142): 297-302 35

Rodríguez, M.A., Winemiller, K.O., Lewis, Jr., W.M. & Taphorn Baechle, D.C. 2007. The freshwater habitats, fishes, and fisheries of the Orinoco River basin. Aquatic Ecosystem Health & Management, 10(2): 140-152. Rosa I.L., Sampaio C.L.S. & Barros A.T. 2006. Collaborative monitoring of the ornamental trade of seahorses and pipefishes (Teleostei : Syngnathidae) in Brazil: Bahia State as a case study. Neotropical Ichthyology 4(2): 247-252 Rubec, P. 1987. Fish capture methods and Philippine coral reefs - IMA Philippines visit. Part II. Marine Fish Monitor 2(7): 30-31. Rubec, P.J. 1986. The effects of sodium cyanide on coral reefs and marine fish in the Philippines. pp. 297-302. In Maclean J.L., Dizon L.B. & Hosillos L.V. (Eds.) The First Asian Fisheries Forum. Manila: Asian Fisheries Society. Rubec, P.J., Cruz, F., Pratt, V., Oellers, R., Mccullough, B. & Lallo, F. 2001. Cyanidefree Net-caught Fish for the Marine Aquarium Trade. Aquarium Sciences and Conservation 3(1): 37-51 Rubec, P.J., F. Cruz, V. Pratt, R. Oellers and F. Lallo. 2000. Cyanide-free, net-caught fish for the marine aquarium trade. SPC Live Reef Fish Information Bulletin 7. Pp 28-34. Rubec, P.J., Pratt, V.R. & Cruz, F. 2001. Territorial Use Rights in Fisheries to Manage Areas for Farming Coral Reef Fish and Invertebrates for the Aquarium Trade. Aquarium Sciences and Conservation 3(1): 119-134 Sadovy Y, Vincent A (2002). Ecological issues and the trades in live reef fishes. In: Coral Reef Fishes. Dynamics and Diversity in a Complex Ecosystem (ed. P Sale), pp 391-420. Academic Press, San Diego CA, USA. Sadovy, S. 1992. A preliminary assessment of the export trade in marine aquarium organisms in Puerto Rico. Proceedings of the 7th International Coral Reef Symposium, Guam 2: 1014-1022 Sadovy, Y. 2005. Trouble on the reef: the imperative for managing vulnerable and valuable fisheries. Fish and Fisheries 6(3): 167-185 Sadovy, Y., Kulbicki, M., Labrosse, P., Letourneur, Y., Lokani, P. & Donaldson, T.J. 2003. The humphead wrasse, Cheilinus undulatus: Synopsis of a threatened and poorly known giant coral reef fish. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 13(3): 327-364 Sadovy, Y., Mitcheson, G. & Rasotto, M.B. 2001. Early development of the mandarinfish, Synchiropus splendidus (Callionymidae), with notes on its fishery and potential for culture. Aquarium Sciences and Conservation 3(4): 253263 Sadovy,Y. & Cheung, W.L. 2003. Near extinction of a highly fecund fish: the one that nearly got away. Fish and Fisheries 4(1): 86-99 Sale, P. (ed.) 2002. Coral reef fishes: dynamics and diversity in a complex ecosystem. Academic Press, San Diego, California, USA Salin, K.R., Yohannan, T.M. & Mohanakumaran. 2005. Fisheries and trade of seahorses, Hippocampus spp., in southern India. Fisheries Management & Ecology 12(4): 269-273 Sallmann, M. 2001. Importation of wild and pet animals at Frankfurt-on-Main airport as an example. Berliner und Munchener Tierarztliche Wochenschrift, 108(8): 326327 Samoilys, M. A. 1988. Abundance and species richness of coral reef fish on the Kenyan coast: the effects of protective management and fishing. Proeedings of the Sixth Inernational. Coral Reef Symposium, Australia: 261-166.


SAP. 2000. The Strategic Action Programme for the Sustainable Management of Lake Tanganyika. Adopted by the four riparian states at the final meeting of the LTBP Regional Steering Committee. Nairobi, July 13, 2000. Scales, H., Balmford, A. & Manica, A. 2007. Impacts of the live reef fish trade on populations of coral reef fish off northern Borneo. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences 274(1612): 989-994. Schmidt, C. & Kunzmann, A. 2005. Post-harvest mortality in the marine aquarium trade: a case study of an Indonesian export facility. SPC Live Reef Fish Information Bulletin 13: 3-12. Scott, D.A. & Poole, C.M. 1989. A status overview of Asian wetlands based on “A Directory of Asian Wetlands”. Asian Wetland Bureau, 1989. Semmens, B., Buhle, E., Salomon, A. & Pattengill-Semmens, C. 2004. A hotspot of non-native marine fishes: evidence for the aquarium trade as an invasion pathway. Marine Ecology-Progress Series 266: 239-244 Shuman, C., Hodgson, G. & Ambrose, R. 2004. Managing the marine aquarium trade: is eco-certification the answer? Environmental Conservation 31(4): 339-348 Shuman, C.S., Hodgson, G. & Ambrose, R.F. 2005. Population impacts of collecting sea anemones and anemonefish for the marine aquarium trade in the Philippines. Coral Reefs 24(4): 564-573. Sieswerda, P. & Marquardt, J. 1995. Saving fragile coral ecosystems requires cooperation. Wildlife Conservation 18-25 Smith, K. G. & Darwall, W.R.T. 2006. The status and distribution of freshwater fish endemic to the Mediterranean basin. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species – Mediterranean Regional Assessment No. 1. Snoeks, J. 2001. Cichlid diversity, speciation and systematics: examples from the Great African Lakes. Journal of Aquariculture & Aquatic Sciences, 9: 150-166. Soegiarto, A & Polunin, N.V.C. 1980. The marine environment of Indonesia. IUCN. Gland. Spalding M.D., Ravilious, C., and Green, E.P. 2001. World atlas of coral reefs. Prepared at the UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre. University of California Press. Spotte, S. & Bubucis, P.M. 1995. Visual Censusing of Two Coral Fishes Important to the Marine Aquarium Trade. Conservation Biology 9(5): 1304-1306 Sugiyama, S., Staples, D. & Funge-Smith, S. 2004. Status and potential of fisheries and aquaculture in Asia and the Pacific. Asia-Pacific Fishery Commission, FAO Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific, Bangkok, Thailand. URL: Date accessed: 29/05/07 Taylor, L., and Nolan, R. 1978. Papers and comments on tropical reef fish. Working Paper No. 34, August 1978. Sea Grant College Program, University of Hawaii. Tello, S.M. & Cánepa, J.R.S. 1991. Estado actual de la explotación de los principales peces ornamentales de la Amazonía Peruana. Folia Amazonica, 3: 109-128 The Contracting Parties to the Nairobi Convention. 2000. Progress in Implementing the Jakarta Mandate in the Eastern Africa Region: A Report to the Fifth Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity. IUCN Eastern Africa Programme, Nairobi, Kenya Thoney, D.A.; Warmolts, D.I. & Andrews, C. 2003. Acquisition of fishes and aquatic invertebrates for zoological collections. Is there a future? Zoo Biology 22(6): 519-527 Thong, H.X., Van P.T.H and Hai, P.G. 1996. A review of coastal fisheries management strategies and a baseline socio-economic survey of small scale 37

fishing households and communities in Vietnam. Institute of Fisheries Economics and Planning, Ministry of Fisheries, Vietnam. Thorburn, C.C. 2001. The house that poison built: Customary marine property rights and the live food fish trade in the Kei Islands, southeast Maluku. Development and Change 32(1): 151-180 Tissot, B. 2005. Integral marine ecology: Community-based fishery management in Hawaii, World Futures 61: 79–95. Tissot, B.N. & Hallacher, L.E. 1999. Impacts of aquarium collectors on reef fishes in Kona, Hawaii. Final Report. Department of Land and Natural Resources, Honolulu, HI. 32pp. Tissot, B.N. & Hallacher, L.E. 2003. Effects of Aquarium Collectors on Coral Reef Fishes in Kona, Hawaii. Conservation Biology 17(6): 1759-1768 Tissot, B.N. 1999. Adaptive management of aquarium fish collecting in Hawaii. SPC Live Reef Fish Information Bulletin No. 6. Tissot, B.N., Walsh, W.J.& Hallacher, L.E. 2002. The effectiveness of marine protected areas and the impacts of aquarium fish collection in Hawaii. Technical Report 2001. URL: www.coralreefnetwork/com/kona/publications.htm. Date accessed: July 2007 Tlusty, M. 2002. The benefits and risks of aquacultural production for the aquarium trade. Aquaculture, 205:203-219. Tlusty, M. 2004. Ornamental aquaculture: Small scale of production does not automatically mean small scale of impact. OFI Journal 46: 6-9 Tlusty, M., Dowd, S. & Ortiz von Halle, B. 2006. Yes fish need to be certified - a reply to Watson. OFI Journal, 51:19-22 Tsang, A.C.W. 2001. A glance at the marine aquarium fish trade in Hong Kong. Porcupine 24. December 2001. URL: Accessed: March 2007 Tung, V. 1985. The Arowana trade. Malayan Naturalist 40: 15-17. UNEP/ICRAN. 2003. UNEP/ICRAN Project in Ninh Thuan - Vietnam: Final report 2002. URL: Date accessed: July 2007 UNEP-WCMC. 2002. Global Marine Aquarium Database. URL: Date accessed: 05/07/07 Vagelli, A. & Erdmann, M. 2002. First Comprehensive Ecological Survey of the Banggai cardinalfish, Pterapogon Kauderni. Environmental Biology of Fishes 63(1): 1-8 Vagelli, A. 1999. The reproductive biology and early ontogeny of the mouthbrooding Banggai cardinalfish, Pterapogon kauderni (Perciformes, Apogonidae). Environmental Biology of Fishes 56: 79–92 Wabnitz, C., Taylor, M., Green, E., Razak, T. 2003. From Ocean to Aquarium. UNEPWCMC, Cambridge, UK. Wahr, A.C., Hildebrand, H., Unshelm, J. & Erhard, M.H. 2005. Aspects of animal welfare and species protection in the international trade of ornamental fish and air transport to Germany. Berliner und Munchener Tierarztliche Wochenschrift. 118(5-6): 177-185 Warren-Rhodes, K., Sadovy, Y. & Cesar, H. 2003. Marine Ecosystem Appropriation in the Indo-Pacific: A Case Study of the Live Reef Fish Food Trade. Ambio 32(7): 481-488. Watson, C.A. & Hill, J.E. 2006. Design criteria for recirculating, marine ornamental production systems. Aquacultural Engineering 34(3): 157-162 38

Watson, C.A. & Shireman, J.V. 2002. Production of Ornamental Aquarium Fish. FA 35. University of Florida. accessed 16th May, 2007. Watson, I. & Moreau, M. 2006. The ornamental fish trade in support of livelihoods. OFI Journal 50: 20-23 Watson, I. 2000. The role of the ornamental fish industry in poverty alleviation. NRI Report No. 2504. 66pp. Watson, I. 2005. Do fish need to be certified? OFI Journal, 49. Weigle, S.M., Smith, L.D., Carlton, J.T. & Pederson, J. 2005. Assesing the Risk of Introducing Exotic Species via the Live Marine Species Trade. Conservation Biology 19(1): 213-223 Whittington, M., Pereira, M.A.M., Goncalves, M. & Costa, A. 2000. An Investigation of the Ornamental Fish Trade in Mozambique. Phase I: Information macrodiagnostic and project appraisal. Coastal Management Unit, MICOA, Mozambique Whittington, R. J. J. & Chong, R. 2007. 'Global trade in ornamental fish from an Australian perspective: The case for revised import risk analysis and management strategies', Preventive Veterinary Medicine. 81 (1-3): 92-116. Wijesekara, R.G.S. & Yakupitiyage, A. 2001. Ornamental Fish Industry in Sri Lanka: Present Status and Future Trends. Aquarium Sciences and Conservation 3(4): 241-252. Cited by Bartley, 2000. Wilhelmsson, & D. Obura (eds.). 2002. Coral degradation in the Indian Ocean: Status Report 2002. CORDIO, Department of Biology and Environmental Science, University of Kalmar, Kalmar, Sweden. Pp 158-166 Wilhelmsson, D. Haputhantri, S.S.K., Rajasuriya, A. & Vidanage, S.P. 2002. Monitoring the Trends of Marine Ornamental Fish Collection in Sri Lanka. In: O. Linden, D. Souter, D. Wilhelmsson, D. & Obura, D. (Eds.) 2002. Coral reef degradation in the Indian Ocean. Status report 2002. CORDIO, Sweden. Wirth, F.F. & Luzar, E.J. 2000. A Scale Measure of State Regulatory Climate Toward Finfish Aquaculture. Journal of the World Aquaculture Society 31(4): 545—557 Witte, F., Msuku, B.S., Wanink, J.H., Seehausen, O., Katunzi, E.F.B., Goudswaard, P.C. & Goldschmidt, T. 2000. Recovery of cichlid species in Lake Victoria: an examination of factors leading to differential extinction. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, 10:233-241. Wittmer, H. & Hassan, Z. (eds). 2001. ACP-EU Fisheries Research Initiative. Proceedings of the INCO-DEV International Workshop on Policy Options for the Sustainable Use of Coral Reefs and Associated Ecosystems. Mombasa, Kenya, 19-22 June 2000. ACP-EU Fish.Res.Rep., Brussels, Belgium Wood, E. 1985. Exploitation of coral reef fishes for the aquarium trade. Marine Conservation Society, Ross-on-Wye, UK Wood, E. 1992. Trade in tropical marine fish and invertebrates for aquaria. Proposed guidelines and labelling scheme. Marine Conservation Society, Ross-on-Wye, UK Wood, E. 2001a. Collection of coral reef fish for aquaria: global trade, conservation issues and management strategies. Marine Conservation Society, Ross-onWye, UK. Wood, E. 2001b. Global Advances in Conservation and Management of Marine Ornamental Resources. Aquarium Sciences and Conservation 3(1): 65-77 Wood, E. and Rajasuriya, A. 1999. Sri Lanka Marine Aquarium Fishery Conservation and Management Issues. Marine Conservation Society and National Aquatic Resources Agency. 11 pp. 39

Young, L.G.L. 1997. Sustainability issues in the trade for wild and cultured aquarium species. In: B. Paust & J.B. Peters (eds). Proceedings of the International Conference on the Marketing & Shipping and Live Aquatic Products. 1996. Seattle, Washington, USA. ZSL (Zoological Society London). 2007. Ornamental Fish in the Brazilian Amazon. URL:,373,AR.html. ZSL (Zoological Society of London). 2006. Conserving ornamental fish in the Amazon. Accessed 26/07/2007.


Sign up to vote on this title
UsefulNot useful