7 views

Uploaded by Fira Auliaul Fitrah

teaching math

- finding.docx
- Trends and Issues in Mathematics Curriculum Research
- God Created the Integers the Mathematical Breakthroughs That Changed History
- mathematicscurr overview docx
- PhysRevSTPER.9.020119
- 8 Socas Hernandez Pp191 218
- artikel maths 1
- self-evaluation-form
- The Use of Calculators in Primary Schools is Quite Alarming
- Tactical Approach to games for understanding
- workshop lesson outline example
- math 4th 2017
- csimathrubric
- Analytic Framework for Students’
- foundations ob 2
- 6301-Chapter 06 10 and 11
- IELTS Master Guide Writing Task 2 Topics
- A Science of Reasoning
- interdisciplinary dictionary
- Case Study Feedback

You are on page 1of 5

Dilemma in Teaching Mathematics

Nafisah @ Kamariah Md Kamaruddin, Zulkarnain Md Amin

Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia,

J ohor, Malaysia

The challenge in mathematics education is finding the best way to teach mathematics. When students learn the

reasoning and proving in mathematics, they will be proficient in mathematics. Students must know mathematics

before they can apply it. Symbolism and logic is the key to both the learning of mathematics and its effective

application to problem situations. Above all, the use of appropriate language is the key to making mathematics

intelligible. In a very real sense, mathematics is a language. Proficiency in this language can be acquired only by

long and carefully supervised experience in using it in situations involving argument and proof. Mathematics is

essentially a structured hierarchy of proposition forged by logic on a postulation base. However, nowadays, the

teaching of mathematics is more on focusing the mathematical procedures. Students learn variety of

problem-solving in mathematics and then on its application. In addition, the teaching of mathematics is moving

towards the use of mathematics in the real world. This method is said to motivate students to learn mathematics and

enable them to transfer this knowledge in their daily live and future career. There are beliefs that due to the current

over-emphasis on problem-solving and applications, students who enjoy working the problems in high school math,

and hence decide that they like mathematics and want to major in it, find that the nature of the subject changes

abruptly when they encounter the proof courses. They are bewildered and dismayed. Their previous

problem-solving courses did not prepare them for this abrupt changed. Is argument and proof in the

applications-problem centered domain of school mathematics being postponed, suppressed and downgraded? Are

we sacrificing the essence of mathematics in order to motivate students to learn and appreciate mathematics? In this

paper, the authors will discuss on this issue.

Keywords: mathematics education, real life, motivation

Introduction

The involvement of a society in mathematics is determined by cultural and functional factors.

Mathematics has its own intrinsic beauty and aesthetic appeal, but its cultural role is determined mainly by its

perceived educational qualities. The achievements and structures of mathematics are recognized as being

among the greatest intellectual attainments of the human species, and therefore, are seen as being worthy of

study in their own right, while the heavy reliance of mathematics on logical reasoning is seen to have

educational merit in a world where rational thought and behaviors are highly valued. Furthermore, the potential

for sharpening the wit and problem-solving abilities fostered by study of mathematics is also seen as

contributing significantly to the general objectives of acquiring wisdom and intellectual capabilities. These

Nafisah @ Kamariah Md Kamaruddin, Centre for Diploma Studies, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia.

Zulkarnain Md Amin, Centre for Diploma Studies, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia.

DAVID PUBLISHING

D

DILEMMA IN TEACHING MATHEMATICS

146

cultural aspects affect our society to some degree through our formal educational processes, reflecting the

degree to which the society is committed to liberal or humanist education. In particular, it is a point of view

adopted by many professional mathematicians in their teaching and research activities.

The functional aspect of mathematics stems from its importance as the language of science, engineering

and technology, and its role in their development. This involvement is as old as mathematics itself and it can be

argued that, without mathematics, there can be neither science nor engineering. In modern times, adoption of

mathematical methods in the social, medical and physical sciences has expanded rapidly, confirming

mathematics as an indispensable part of all school curricula and creating great demand for university-level

mathematical training. Much of the demand stems directly from the need for mathematical and statistical

modeling of phenomena. Such modeling is basic to all engineering, plays a vital role in all physical sciences

and contributes significantly to the biological sciences, medicine, psychology, economics and commerce.

Challenge in Mathematics Education

The challenge in mathematics education is finding the best way to teach mathematics. When students learn

the reasoning and proving in mathematics, they will be proficient in mathematics. Students must know

mathematics before they can apply it. Symbolism and logic is the key to both the learning of mathematics and

its effective application to problem situations. Above all, the use of appropriate language is the key to making

mathematics intelligible. In a very real sense, mathematics is a language. Proficiency in this language can be

acquired only by long and carefully supervised experience in using it in situations involving argument and

proof. Mathematics is essentially a structured hierarchy of proposition forged by logic on a postulation base.

However, nowadays, the teaching of mathematics is more focusing on the mathematical procedures. Students

learn variety of problem-solving in mathematics and then on its application. In addition, the teaching of

mathematics is moving towards the use of mathematics in the real world. According to Sargent (2000), in Md

Kamaruddin and Wan Ahmad (2007b), the workplace/community learning focuses on the subject matter that

connects to the workplace or the real world in America. In 1997, the Technical Education Department under the

Ministry of Education, Malaysia, introduced the contextual approach where they got the concept from America,

in the teaching and learning mathematics and additional mathematics in all Malaysian technical secondary

schools (Md Kamaruddin & Wan Ahmad, 2007). Students were able to understand abstract concepts through

concrete experiences. A good student commented that she would still understand the concept by either method

but she understood faster with the contextual approach (Md Kamaruddin & Wan Ahmad, 2007). Students

preferred this method, because usually they learned mathematics very mechanistic, which was memorizing the

formula and solving problems using the formula (Md Kamaruddin & Md Amin, 2007a). Not only the students

were able to learn faster by this method, but the lab activities helped students develop critical thinking skills

(Md Kamaruddin & Wan Ahmad, 2007c). Besides using concrete experiences, the use of video clips helped

students know how mathematics is used in the real world. The illustration with video attracted their attention

during the lesson and this approach was able to motivate them to focus on the lessons (Md Kamaruddin &

Abdul Hamid, 2005). This method of teaching mathematics is good for technical students (Md Kamaruddin &

Wan Ahmad, 2006). In problem-based learning, the contextual concept is used as this method of learning is

built around the delivery of the real-world learning experience (Md Kamaruddin & Wan Ahmad, 2007d). From

the research done in Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia, students preferred to learn statistics using the

contextual concept and they scored better than the group who did not use this concept (Md Kamaruddin & Wan

DILEMMA IN TEACHING MATHEMATICS

147

Ahmad, 2007d).

There are beliefs that due to the current over-emphasis on problem-solving and applications, students who

enjoy working the problems in high school math, and hence decide that they like mathematics and want to

major in it, find that the nature of the subject changes abruptly when they encounter the proof courses. They are

bewildered and dismayed. Their previous problem-solving courses did not prepare them for this abrupt changed.

Is argument and proof in the applications-problem centered domain of school mathematics being postponed,

suppressed and downgraded? Are we sacrificing the essence of mathematics in order to motivate students to

learn and appreciate mathematics?

The Conflict

We think in terms of words. Yet today, anyone, who identifies lexical reasoning, based on gradually

formalized natural language, as the key to the learning of mathematics, is filing a minority report. The tendency

to downplay this important idea has been dominant in mathematics education circles for many years.

A somewhat parallel situation exists in English classes of secondary school. Nowadays, English teachers

who seek to clarify meaning and facilitate intelligible communication by insisting on the enforcement of the

accepted rules of grammar and syntax are fighting a losing battle, and worse, are patronized and ridiculed for

being uptight. Those of us who insist on the crucial importance of lexical reasoning and proof in the teaching

and learning of secondary school mathematics are in the same boat, even though this was once the dominant

viewpoint. We live in an age of ambiguity where it is far more profitable to be fluent and verbose than it is to

be articulate. At such a time, the learning of mathematics, which requires understanding of carefully worded

expositions as well as appreciation of carefully drawn distinctions, is bound to suffer, and it is suffering.

J udging by the performance levels, is the school mathematics in Malaysia in regression? Perhaps, we should

reassess some of the highly controversial doctrines which have, in recent years, gained a large measure of

uncritical acceptance.

At any given time, there are certain widely accepted viewpoints that are difficult to challenge. Unpopular

ideas of that question, this prevailing orthodoxy are silenced or ignored, even though their logic is simple and

their validity is clear.

In the present context, the widely accepted viewpoints are essentially these: If we emphasize the

applications of school mathematics in a wide variety of problem-solving situations, two good things will

happen: (1) The student will somehow learn the mathematics needed to solve these problems; and (2) Seeing

that mathematics is useful, he/she will be motivated to learn more mathematics. This viewpoint recommends that the

mathematics curriculumbe organized, not around its own internal structure, but around problem-solving.

Does the current emphasis on the application and problem-solving aspects of school mathematics indicate

that the utility criteria are being strictly and shortsightedly applied? We think it does. We think that utility is

being overemphasized at the expense of certain intrinsic values of school mathematics which would serve the

student better in the long run. We never hear anymore about the beauty of mathematics or about its structure

and internal consistency or about mathematics as an ideal arena for the application of logic to the thinking

process or indeed about any of the cultural values of mathematics that have been cherished by the race for

generations.

All this is ignored by the sweeping recommendation that the mathematics curriculum should be organized

around problem-solving. In fact, this recommendation almost denies that school mathematics exists as a

DILEMMA IN TEACHING MATHEMATICS

148

separate entity apart from its applications. It implies, moreover, that mathematics in and of itself is pretty

dismal stuff which can interest no one, unless it is attached to some supposedly interesting situation in the real

world. If we make this attachment, maybe some of the interest derived from these external situations will rub

off on the mathematics, and thus, it will render more palatable to the student.

This brings us to our recommendation that natural language, gradually expanded to include symbolism and

logic, is the key to both the learning of mathematics and its effective application to problem situations. And

above all, the use of appropriate language is the key to making mathematics intelligible. Indeed, in a very real

sense, mathematics is a language. Proficiency in this language can be acquired only by long and carefully

supervised experience in using it in situations involving argument and proof.

Due to the current overemphasis on problem-solving and applications, the student of school mathematics

does not get nearly enough experience with the various aspects of proof.

Can we suppress proof without distorting school mathematics and seriously impairing the students ability

to understand it? Mathematics is essentially a structured hierarchy of propositions forged by logic on a

postulation base. For how long, do we protect our students from the pedagogical consequences of this fact?

And indeed, whom are we protecting? Those who advocate this language of logical discourse are seeking

clarity of exposition rather than pretentious rigor in proof.

Also, due to our preoccupation with applications, there is not nearly enough time spent in deriving key

propositions and theorems. When you and the author say that we understand the theorem the determinant of a

square matrix is zero if and only if its rows are linearly dependent, we are saying that we understand how this

theorem fits into a hierarchy of propositions, and could given time, derive it from first principles.

Why should our students be any different? To be sure, they are working at a more elementary level. But,

this nagging question remains: What basis do they have for understanding anything without seeing how it fits

into a structure based on something?.

Yet, when high school students say that they understand the formula for the cosine of a difference, they

generally mean that they have memorized the formula and can apply it. They generally do not mean that they

can derive it from first principles. Very often they do not realize that this essential dimension of understanding

even exists, i.e., their understanding is deficient. So, they get by on memory and facility until the cumulative

effects of these deficiencies ultimately overwhelm them, and they leave mathematics in frustration and despair.

We can prevent this by equipping the student with the essentials of the language needed to understand

mathematical reasoning.

Conclusions

Due to our reluctance to use a handful of universally valid and easily understood logical principles, we are

denying our students the opportunity to understand.

For too long, have we sheltered our students from explanations deemed to be too difficult for them? When

explanations are inadequate or missing entirely, students attribute their resulting lack of understanding to the

idea that there is something abstruse and forbidding about mathematics which they will never be able to

understand. The result may be permanent alienation from both mathematics and the mathematical sciences.

This alienation not only cripples thousands of students, it cripples our economy and our defense posture as

well.

Problem-solving, important as it is, does not provide adequate preparation. Many students who enjoy

DILEMMA IN TEACHING MATHEMATICS

149

working the problems in high school math and even in calculus, and hence decide that they like mathematics

and want to major in it, find that the nature of the subject changes abruptly, when they encounter the proof

courses which follow calculus. They are bewildered and dismayed in courses, such as Linear Algebra,

Advanced Calculus and Topology where proof is the name of the game. Their previous problem-solving

courses did not prepare them for this abrupt change in emphasis. Their rude awakening often comes so late that

it is difficult to change majors. This is tragic. As educators, we have become increasingly aware of the dilemma

facing those teaching mathematics. How can we best provide an appropriate environment to motivate students

whilst maintaining its essence?

References

Md Kamaruddin, N. K., & Abdul Hamid, M. Z. (2005). A survey of the application of multimedia in the process of teaching and

learning in KUiTTHO, Malaysia. 4th International Conference on Technology in Teaching and Learning in Higher

Education. Beijing, China.

Md Kamaruddin, N. K., & Wan Ahmad, W. A. R. (2006). The effectiveness of learning mathematics using contextual approach in

KUiTTHO. 3rd International Conference on the Teaching of Mathematics at the Undergraduate Level. Istanbul, Turkey.

Md Kamaruddin, N. K., & Wan Ahmad, W. A. R. (2007a). A study of the effectiveness of the contextual approach to the teaching

and learning statistics in the Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia. The 12th Asian Technology Conference in Mathematics

(ATCM 2007). Taipei, Taiwan.

Md Kamaruddin, N. K., & Wan Ahmad, W. A. R. (2007b). A contextual approach, using problem-based, to teaching and learning

differential equations in the Universiti Tun Hussein Malaysia. SEAMS 2007. Yogyakarta, Indonesia.

Md Kamaruddin, N. K., & Wan Ahmad, W. A. R. (2007c). A contextual approach, using problem-based, to teaching and learning

statistics in KUiTTHO. 4th East Asia Regional Conference on Mathematics Education (EARCOME 4). Penang, Malaysia.

Md Kamaruddin, N. K., & Wan Ahmad, W. A. R. (2007d). A contextual approach to teaching and learning statistics in UTHM.

International Conference on Research and Education on Mathematics (ICREM3). Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

Sargent, T. (2000). Linking educators professional development to workplace/community learning experience. Educational Brief,

1.

- finding.docxUploaded byAnonymous 6tnaPFbe
- Trends and Issues in Mathematics Curriculum ResearchUploaded byNurfadzihah Samad
- God Created the Integers the Mathematical Breakthroughs That Changed HistoryUploaded byDenise
- mathematicscurr overview docxUploaded byapi-283046413
- PhysRevSTPER.9.020119Uploaded byKusumaningtyas Kartika
- 8 Socas Hernandez Pp191 218Uploaded bymaleckisale
- artikel maths 1Uploaded byapi-301577154
- self-evaluation-formUploaded byapi-391291388
- The Use of Calculators in Primary Schools is Quite AlarmingUploaded bymaruko leong
- Tactical Approach to games for understandingUploaded bylos79
- workshop lesson outline exampleUploaded byapi-404944889
- math 4th 2017Uploaded byapi-267803318
- csimathrubricUploaded byapi-353436617
- Analytic Framework for Students’Uploaded byEmiDestianingsihII
- foundations ob 2Uploaded byapi-335953117
- 6301-Chapter 06 10 and 11Uploaded byCarol Spindola
- IELTS Master Guide Writing Task 2 TopicsUploaded bywraysp
- A Science of ReasoningUploaded byjsennek
- interdisciplinary dictionaryUploaded byapi-254424729
- Case Study FeedbackUploaded byAlice
- Graphic OrganizersUploaded byCITCEducator
- lesson planUploaded byapi-358692112
- itf.docUploaded byMary Joyce Fajardo
- gr3 teks sidebysideUploaded byapi-240576020
- productFlyer_978-1-85233-552-6Uploaded byMARCELO
- Prof Sopia Ppt Slides (1)Uploaded byKhairiltitov Zainuddin
- Behavioral InterviewUploaded byderira
- (Design Science Planning) John Restrepo - Information Processing in Design -Purdue University Press (2004).pdfUploaded byDipu George
- Level D Course cwk (WP)Uploaded byscots1256
- 01 Psm 1 General Conduct FormUploaded bysibie

- 30034943Uploaded byFira Auliaul Fitrah
- UTS PBM 17709251013Uploaded byFira Auliaul Fitrah
- Expression Polygons Mt2015!08!62z1Uploaded byFira Auliaul Fitrah
- Presentation 1Uploaded byFira Auliaul Fitrah
- Analisis Kovarian (Ancova)Uploaded byFira Auliaul Fitrah
- Math 4 - 6Uploaded byFira Auliaul Fitrah
- PreziUploaded byFira Auliaul Fitrah
- English as a Second Language in Mathematics LearningUploaded byFira Auliaul Fitrah
- English as a Second Language in Mathematics LearningUploaded byFira Auliaul Fitrah
- English as a Second Language in Mathematics LearningUploaded byFira Auliaul Fitrah
- ArithmeticsUploaded byFira Auliaul Fitrah
- ArithmeticsUploaded byFira Auliaul Fitrah

- 2005-4pp170-180Uploaded bydsaha777
- SDA User Manual 782013 UpdatedUploaded bytwb23
- Saint MarshallUploaded bysinestrio
- english language arts reflectionUploaded byapi-273256436
- SBI-PO-Preliminary-Model-Paper-15.pdfUploaded bySrikanth Harinadh B
- IJERTV1IS9009Uploaded byprabhakini
- Algebra BungeUploaded byIvan Gavriloff
- QuizUploaded byMyra Ramirez Ramos
- Cnc MaintenanceUploaded byArjun M Betageri
- Fusion Payable Check MICR FontUploaded byNaguSwamy
- Arquitectónica de Voces - Federico García Lorca y El Poema Del Cante JondoUploaded byRalos86
- Omoiyari _ Kazuya Hara_ch3Uploaded byVanityStalks
- Samuel McCormick - The Political Identity of the PhilosopherUploaded byAdrixDuende
- Trinity_and_Man_Gregory_of_NyssaUploaded bypezzilla
- MD.configuringMDaemonToDealWithSpamUploaded byadjad
- anuradha khara anukriti paperUploaded byapi-256175360
- blooms-taxonomy.pdfUploaded byhichem_nasro
- Chapter 3 (John H. Mathews)Uploaded byAlan Wang
- ECE_Sem_3_QP_BankUploaded bykunaraj
- Review Useful Vocab cae writingUploaded byMarica Jovanova
- Erasmus' Ecclesiastes Emotion InUploaded byRafael Pola
- 04Uploaded byRenzo Flores
- Ddm ContentUploaded byMario Mele
- (ESP) English for Specific Purposes 1981 - 1990Uploaded byOdonkz Forrealracingtiga
- GUI_guideUploaded byN R SHEKAR
- Test Pastsimple VIUploaded byamoromete
- IBM Toolbox for JavaUploaded byJacek Wiergiles
- Aquinas and the Life of the MindUploaded byThomas Aquinas 33
- Rexroth PLCvsPC LUploaded byOG
- [Ruma Pal] Computer Programming ProblemsUploaded byAamer