This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?
Just-in-time (JIT) is a management philosophy that strives to eliminate sources of manufacturing waste by producing the right part in the right place at the right time. Waste results from any activity that adds cost without adding value, such as moving and storing. JIT (also known as lean production or stockless production) should improve profits and return on investment by reducing inventory levels (increasing the inventory turnover rate), reducing variability, improving product quality, reducing production and delivery lead times, and reducing other costs (such as those associated with machine setup and equipment breakdown). In a JIT system, underutilized (excess) capacity is used instead of buffer inventories to hedge against problems that may arise. JIT applies primarily to repetitive manufacturing processes in which the same products and components are produced over and over again. The general idea is to establish flow processes (even when the facility uses a jobbing or batch process layout) by linking work centers so that there is an even, balanced flow of materials throughout the entire production process, similar to that found in an assembly line. To accomplish this, an attempt is made to reach the goals of driving all queues toward zero and achieving the ideal lot size of one unit.
The goal of JIT, therefore, is to minimize the presence of non-value-adding operations and non-moving inventories in the production line. This will result in shorter throughput times, better on-time delivery performance, higher equipment utilization, lesser space requirement, lower costs, and greater profits.
JIT was developed as a means of meeting customer demands with minimum delays. Thus, in the olden days, JIT is used not to reduce manufacturing wastage, but primarily to produce goods so that customer orders are met exactly when they need the products.
JIT is also known as lean production or stockless production, since the key behind a successful implementation of JIT is the reduction of inventory levels at the various stations of the production line to the absolute minimum. This necessitates good coordination between stations such that every station produces only the exact volume that the next station needs. On the other hand, a station pulls in only the exact volume that it needs from the preceding station.
The JIT system consists of defining the production flow and setting up the production floor such that the flow of materials as they get manufactured through the line is smooth and unimpeded, thereby reducing material waiting time.
This requires that the capacities of the various workstations that the materials pass through are very evenly matched and balanced, such that bottlenecks in the production line are eliminated. This set-up ensures that the materials will undergo manufacturing without queuing or stoppage.
Another important aspect of JIT is the use of a 'pull' system to move inventories through the production line. Under such a system, the requirements of the next station are what modulate the production of a particular station. It is therefore necessary under JIT to define a process by which the pulling of lots from one station to the next is facilitated.
JIT is most applicable to operations or production flows that do not change, i.e., those that are simply repeated over and over again. An example of this would be an automobile assembly line, wherein every car undergoes the same production process as the one before it.
Some semiconductor companies have likewise practiced JIT successfully. Still, there are some semiconductor companies that don’t practice JIT for the simple reason that their operations are too complex for JIT application. On the other hand, that’s precisely the challenge of JIT – creation of a production set-up that is simple enough to allow JIT. (find a semi conductor factory)
Inventory stocks allow production process to continue even when some problem occurs. In a way, inventory stocks act like a buffers to hide any problem that may occur. But, with JIT, there are no buffers to hide problems and thus, occurrence of problem can shut down the entire production process. Thus, JIT philosophy helps organization to prominently expose
problems and thus, bring a clear focus on removal of it at source, by eliminating the cause, rather than effects, of problem.
With JIT, it is believed that the root causes of most problems are due to faulty production process design. Hence, with JIT, nothing is taken for granted, everything is subject to analysis.
Each activity is identified as either ‘Value-Added’ or ‘Non-Value-Added’. The reduction of ‘Non-Value-Added’ activities is achieved mainly through increasing manufacturing flexibility and improved quality.
JIT is an extremely powerful tool to identify where improvements should be made. It helps you to identify cause (not the effect) of problem and its elimination. Failures and exceptions are treated as opportunities to improve the system. In fact, JIT initiates failures due to problems to expose them. It is a system of trouble-shooting, within a culture of constant analysis and improvement. It is clear, as an attitude and approach, JIT and TQM are perfectly complimentary to each other, to expose and correct problems at source, so as to avoid wasting resources on production of defective products.
Just-in-time manufacturing is a process where suppliers deliver inventory to the factory only when it's needed for assembly. Companies are beginning to
turn to Internet-based technologies to communicate with their suppliers, making the just-in-time ordering and delivery process speedier and more flexible.
History of Just in Time:
Just-In-Time is a Japanese manufacturing management method developed in 1970s. It was first adopted by Toyota manufacturing plants by Taiichi Ohno. The main concern at that time was to meet consumer demands. Because of the success of JIT management, Taiichi Ohno was named the Father of JIT.
After the first introduction of JIT by Toyota, many companies followed up and around mid 1970s’, it gained extended support and widely used by many companies.
One motivated reason for developing JIT and some other better production techniques was that after World War II, Japanese people had a very strong incentive to develop a good manufacturing techniques to help them rebuilding the economy. They also had a strong working ethnic which was concentrated on work rather than leisure, seeked continuous improvement, life commitment to work, group conscious rather than individualism and achieved common goal. This kind of motivation had driven Japanese economy to succeed.
Because of the natural constraints and the economy constraints after World War II, Japanese Manufacturers looked for a way to gain the most efficient use of limited resources. They worked on "optimal cost/quality relationship".
Before the introduction of JIT, there were a lot of manufacturing defects for the existing system at that time. According to Hirano, this included inventory problem, product defects, risen cost, large lot production and delivery delays. The inventory problems included the unused accumulated inventory that was not only unproductive, but also required a lot of effort in storing and managing them. Other implied problems such as parts storage, equipment breakdowns, and uneven production levels. For the product defects, manufacturers knew that only one single product defects can destroy the producer’s creditability. They must create a "defectfree" process.
Instead of large lot production - producing one type of products, they awaked that they should produce more diversified goods. There was also a problem of rising cost, the existing system could not reduce cost any further but remember improvement always leads to cost reduction.
Lastly, the existing system did not manage well for fast delivery request, so, there was a need to have a faster and reliable delivery system in order to handle customers’ needs.
Thus, JIT manufacturing management was developed based on these problems.
Focus of JIT?
Mainly JIT focuses to eliminate the waste or the non-value added. Thus there are several types of wastes categorised. JIT usually identifies seven prominent types of waste to be eliminated:
Waste from Overproduction Transportation Waste Processing Waste Waste from Product Defects Waste of waiting/idle time Inventory Waste Waste of Motion
Introduction Phase for Just in Time:
According to Hirano, the introductory phases of JIT involve 5 steps.
STEPS IN THE INTRODUCTORY PHASE OF JIT
Step 1: Awareness Revolution
It means giving up old concept of managing and adopting JIT way of thinking. There are 10 principles for improvement: 1. Abolish old tradition concepts. 2. Assume that new method will work. 3. No excuses are accepted. 4. It is not seeking for perfection, absolutely zero-defect process, few defects is acceptable. 5. Correct mistakes immediately. 6. Do not spend money on improvement. 7. Use you brain to solve problem. 8. Repeat to ask yourself 5 times before any decision. 9. Gather information from several people, more is better! 10. Remember that improvement has no limits.
The idea of giving up old concept was especially for the large lot production, The lot production was felt that "having fewer changeover was better", but it was no longer true. Whereas JIT is a one-piece flow manufacturing. To compare the two, Hirano had this idea:
Lot production: "Unneeded goods...In unneeded quantities...At unneeded times..." JIT: "Needed goods...In needed quantities...At needed times..."
The main point here is to have an awareness of the need of throwing out old system and adopting a new one.
Step 2: 5S’s For Workplace Improvement
The 5S’s stand for:
Seiri - Proper Arrangement Seiton - Orderliness Seiso - Cleanliness Seiketsu - Cleanup Shitsuke – Discipline
This 5S’s should be implemented company-wide and this should be part of a total improvement program.
Seiri - Proper Arrangement means sorting what you have, identifying the needs and throwing out those unnecessary. One example is using red-tags. This is a little red-bordered paper saying what the production is, how many are accumulated and then stick these red tags onto every box of inventory . It enhances the easiness to know the inventory status and can reduce cost. Seiton - Orderliness means making thing in order. Examples include keeping shelves in order, keeping storage areas in order, keeping workplace in order, keeping worktables in order and keeping the office in order. Seiso - Cleanliness means having a clean workplace, equipment, etc. Seiketsu - Cleanup mean maintaining equipment and tools. Shitsuke - Discipline means following the rules and making them a habit.
Step 3: Flow Manufacturing
manufacturing means producing one single piece of product at a time but multi-handling which follows the process sequence.
There are several main points concerning flow manufacturing:
1. Arrange machines in sequence. 2. U-shaped production line (Cellular Manufacturing).
3. Produce one-piece at a time. 4. Train workers to be multi-skilled. 5. Follow the cycle time. 6. Let the workers standing and walking around while working. 7. Use small and dedicated machines.
Step 4: Standard Operations
Standard Operation means to produce quality safely and less expensively through efficient rules and methods of arranging people, products and machines. The basis of standard operations is: 1. Cycle time It means how long it would take to "carry out part all the way through the cell". Following are the equations for calculating cycle time.
Daily Quantity Required = Monthly Quantity Needed / Working Days per month
Cycle Time = Working Hours per day / Daily Quantity Required
2. Work sequence 3. Standard stock-on-hand 4. Use operation charts
Step 5: Multi-Process Handling
Multi-process handling means one worker is responsible for several processes in a cell.
Some points that should be aware:
· Clearly assign jobs to machines and workers. · Make a good use of U-shaped cell manufacturing. · Multi-skilled workers · Operation should be able to perform multi-machine handling and multi process handling.
Multi-machine handling - a worker should handle several machines at once, this is also called "horizontal handling".
Multi-process handling - a worker should handle several different processes at once, this is also called "vertical handling" and this is the basis for JIT production.
· Uses casters extensively as author written, "Floor bolts are our enemies! Machines must be movable."
Elements of Just in Time
According to Cheng, the basic elements of JIT manufacturing are: · People Involvement · Plants · System
People Involvement Maintaining a good support and agreement from people involved in production. This is not only reduce the time and effort in implementation of JIT, but also minimize the chance of creating implementation problem. The attempt to maximize people’s involvement may carry through the introduction of quality circle and total involvement concept.
Manufacturers can gain support from 4 sources. 1. Stockholders and owners of the company - should maintain a good long-term relationship among them. 2. Labor organization - all labors should be well-informed about the goals of JIT, this is crucial in gaining support from the them. 3. Management support - support from all level of management. The ideas of continuous improvement should spread all over the factory, managers and all shop-floor labor. 4. Government support - government can show their support by extending tax and other financial help. This can enhance the motivation, and also help in financing the implementation of JIT.
Plants Certain requirements are needed to implement JIT, there are: 1. Plant layout - the plant layout is mainly focus on maximizing working flexibility. It requires the use of "multi-function workers". 2. Demand pull production - it means to produce when the order is received. This can manage the quantity and time more appropriately. 3. Kanban - a Japanese term for card or tag. Special inventory and process information are written on the card. This helps tying and linking the process more efficiently. 4. Self-inspection - it is carried out by the workers at catch mistakes immediately. 5. Continuous improvement - this concept should be adopted by every members in the organization in order to carry out JIT. This is the most important concept of JIT. This can allow an organization to improve its productivity, service, operation and even customer satisfaction in an ongoing basis. System This refers to the technology and process that combines the different processes and activities together. Two major types are MRP(Material Requirement Planning) and MRP II (Manufacturing Resource Planning). MRP is a computer-based, bottom-up manufacturing approach. This involves two plans, production plan and master production schedule. Production plan involves the management and planning of resources through the available capacity. Master production schedule involves what products to be produced in what time. MRP II is mainly involved the management or planning of financial resources in order to carry out the operation.
Goal of Just in Time
According to Cheng in Just-In-Time Manufacturing – An Introduction, he explains the objectives of JIT. There are three main objectives: 1. Increasing the organization’s ability to compete with others and remain competitive over the long run. The competitiveness of the firms is increased by the use of JIT manufacturing process as they can develop a more optimal process for their firms. 2. Increasing efficiency within the production process. Efficiency is obtained through the increase of productivity and decrease of cost. 3. Reducing wasted materials, time and effort. It can help to reduce the costs. Other short-term and long-term objectives are:1. Identify and response to consumers needs. Customers’ needs and wants seem to be the major focus for business now, this objective will help the firm on what is demanded from customers, and what is required of production. 2. Optimal quality/cost relationship. The organization should focus on zerodefect production process. Although it seems to be unrealistic, in the long run, it will eliminate a huge amount of resources and effort in inspecting, reworking and the production of defected goods. 3. Reduce unwanted wastes. Wastes that do not add value to the products itself should be eliminated. 4. Develop a reliable relationship between the suppliers. A good and longterm relationship between organization and its suppliers helps to manage a more efficient process in inventory management, material management and delivery system. It will also assure that the supply is stable and available when needed. 5. Plant design for maximizing efficiency. The design of plant is essential in terms of manufacturing efficiency and utility of resources. 6. Adopt the work ethnic of Japanese workers for continuous improvement. Commit a long-term continuous improvement throughout the organization. It will help the organization to remain competitive in the long run.
Other Similar Ideas
1. Reduction of Inventory. JIT reduces inventory at all level of the organization. 2. Reduction of Lead Time. Lead time such as setup time and move time and waiting time is reduced. 3. Quality Control. JIT improves the quality control by increasing its efficiency of managing shop floor production and increasing its commitment to its suppliers. 4. Improvement for Performance. In JIT manufacturing, the organization can obtain a greater impact/control over its suppliers. With fewer suppliers, organizations have larger control because the amount purchased is usually large. And, organizations can obtain a tighter requirement on products from their suppliers. 5. Total Preventive Maintenance. JIT provides preventive maintenance to lessen the risk of machine breakdowns. 6. Continuous Improvement. JIT is a never-ending method in operation management. 7. Strategic Gain. JIT helps organization to remain competitive in the market place. 8. Reduction of Wastes. JIT helps significantly in reducing wastes.
JIT can help organization remains competitive by offering consumers higher quality of products than their competitors, it is very important in the survival in the market place. These major objectives are suitable for all organizations. But each organization is unique in some way, adjustments of JIT objectives for each form should be made in order to complement the overall production process.
Limitation of Just in Time
Regardless of the great benefits of JIT, it has its limitations, the following are the major limitations. · Culture Differences The organizational cultures vary from firm to firm. There are some cultures that tie to JIT success but it is difficult for an organization to change its cultures within a short time. · Traditional Approach The traditional approach in manufacturing is to store up a large amount of inventory in the means of backing up during bad time. Those companies rely on safety stocks may have a problem with the use of JIT. · Difference in implementation of JIT Because JIT was originally established in Japanese, it is somehow different for implementing in western countries. The benefits may vary. · Loss of individual autonomy. This is mainly due to the shorter cycle times which adds pressures and stress on the workers. · Loss of team autonomy. This is the result of decreasing buffer inventories which lead to a lower flexibility of the workers to solve problem individually. · Loss of method autonomy. It means the workers must act some way when problems occur, this does not allow them to have their own method to solve a problem. · JIT success is varied from industry to industry. Some industries are benefit more from JIT while others do not. · Resistance to change JIT involves a change throughout the whole organization, but human nature resists to changes. The most common resistances are emotional resistance and rational resistance. Emotional resistance are those psychological feeling which hinder performance such as anxiety. Rational resistance is the deficient of the needed information for the workers to perform the job well.
Some other limitations:-
· Relationship between management and employees is important .A mutual trust must be built between management and employees in order to have effective decision making.
· Employee commitment Employees must commit to JIT, to enhance the quality as their ultimate goal, and to see JIT as a way to compete rather than method used by managers to increase their workload.
· Production level JIT works best for medium to high range of production volume.
· Employee skill JIT requires workers to be multi-skilled and flexible to change.
· Compensation should be set on time-based wages. This allows the workers to concentrate on building what the customers wants.
JIT - Philosophy or Technique????
Just In Time is a philosophy and not the technique for elimination of wastes. The JIT strategy is to have "the right product at the right place at the right time."
The Just-in-time philosophy that emerged, is a management logic based on simplicity and continuous improvement. It may be applied to any process where it will aim to make improvements through elimination of excess, waste and unevenness.
The Just-in-Time concept comprises methods and techniques that aim to increase the potential for short times to delivery.
Production system in which both the movement of goods during production and deliveries from suppliers are carefully timed so that at each step of the process the next (usually small) batch arrives for processing just as the proceeding batch is completed
The "Just in time" (JIT.) inventory concept, also called Kanban, asserts that just enough inventories, arriving just in time to replace that which was just
used, is all the inventory that is necessary at any given time. Excessive inventory unnecessarily ties up money, adds warehousing costs, increases risk of damage and risks obsolescence, and most of all, can possibly obscure opportunities for operational improvements.
Storing inventory is still the basics of warehousing, but in today’s business it constitutes only part of the total. A modern thought on warehousing is that large inventories are really not as necessary as once believed.
To some companies storing large quantities of inventory is detrimental to business because it ties up capital and can also disguise poor management practices. The JIT philosophy emphasizes flow flexibility and developing supply chains to reduce all excess and waste
Implementation Of JIT
Although the just-in-time (JIT) concept is very young, perhaps 10 to 15 years old in this country, it is so widespread in American manufacturing and service. Perhaps this is because the idea is so simple and so appealing. In short, the JIT strategy is to have "the right product at the right place at the right time." It implies that in manufacturing or service, each stages of the process produces exactly the amount that is required for the next step in the process. This notion holds true for all steps within the system.
Suppose, for example, that all products pass through a drilling operation and then a milling operation. With JIT, the drill produces only what the mill will need next. It also holds for the last step that is, the system produces only what the customer desires. Implementation of a JIT system typically includes emphasis on the following aspects of the production process: Production Smoothing Capacity Buffers Set-up Reduction Cross Training and Plant Layout
Total Quality Management
Most of the companies today seek this method of implementation:
Form a top-level team: This team’s responsibilities include deciding upon an organizational structure and developing a plan to implement JIT within the company. This plan should include the company’s goals concerning production, as well as how to establish this plan among all employees (i.e. motivation & discipline) This plan then be used to establish the overall philosophy of the company concerning JIT
To train the top management in the basic concepts of JIT: This is the first step of the implementation process. It is very important to educate and train the top-level management, as they are the ones who frame policies and get things moving. This being a new idea, getting this into practice will need full support & cooperation from these people.
To implement this system to every aspect of the company from supplier to distributors:
First of all each department should establish its goals and a specific problem to attack. Then a team should be chosen by each department and establish team leaders. The teams should focus on the reduction of costs and the elimination of wastes. Data must then be collected on the team’s problems. This data should be plotted in order to find excess waste or costs. Once this is done, measurement should be plotted in order to find excess waste or costs. Once this is done, measurement should be made. Manipulation of this data should show at least some apparent problems in the current system. Further analysis should help in the implementation of JIT by showing problem areas. In addition, the data the data could be used to show the effects of implementing JIT into the company.
Guidelines for Successful JIT Implementation
Make the factory loadings uniform, linear, and stable. Fluctuations in manufacturing loadings will result in bottlenecks. Reduce, if not eliminate, conversion and set-up times. Reduce lot sizes. This will smoothen out the flow of inventories from one station to another, although this may necessitate more frequent deliveries or transfers.
Reduce lead times by moving work stations closer together and streamlining the production floor lay-out, applying cellular manufacturing concepts, using technology to automate processes and improve coordination. Reduce equipment downtimes through good preventive maintenance. Cross-train personnel to achieve a very flexible work force. Require stringent supplier quality assurance since an operation under JIT can not afford to incur errors due to defects. Use a control system to convey lots between workstations efficiently; the use of a kanban system is an example of this
Benefits of JIT
Perhaps, the most significant benefit of JIT is to improve the responsiveness of the firms to the market place thereby affording it an overwhelming advantage in competition. Specific benefits will depend upon size of the market, technology of processes etc. Therefore, they vary from organizations to organization.
One of the benefits of JIT is that with raw materials and WIP being processed in smaller batches, errors can be easily identified and corrected quickly, during each stage of the production process. This in turn has the ‘knock-on’ effects of reducing non-value added costs
Conceptually, the JIT benefits could be grouped into the following categories;
Product Cost: This is greatly reduced of manufacturing cycle time, reduction of scraps, inventories, space requirement, and material handling and eliminations of non-value adding operations.
Quality: It has greatly improved due to fast detection and correction of defects, use of automatic stop devices, higher quality of purchased parts, worker centered quality control and statistical process control. Total preventive maintenance an d lower inventory levels also help in quality improvements.
Design: Due to fast response to engineering change, alternative designs can be quickly brought on the shop floor.
Productivity: Order magnitude productivity improvements are obtained due to the use of flexible workforce, reduced rework, reduced inspection, reduced part delay and reduced throughout time. Workers acquire multiple skills and become highly productive.
JIT systems have a number of other important benefits also, which are attracting the attention of various companies. The main benefits are:
Reduced levels of in-process inventories, purchased goods, and finished goods.
• • • • • • • •
Reduced space requirements. Increased product quality and reduced scrap and rework. Reduced manufacturing lead times. Greater flexibility in changing the production mix. Smoother production flow with fewer disruptions. Worker participation in problem solving. Pressure to build good relationships with vendors. Increased productivity levels and utilization of equipment. 10.Reduction in the need for certain indirect labour.
Just In Time (JIT) Manufacturing
Just in Time manufacturing is a systems approach to developing and operating a manufacturing system. It is based on the total elimination of waste. JIT is not a new concept. It has been part and parcel of the Japanese manufacturing industry adopted approach for quite some time. It requires that equipment, resources and labor are made available only in the amount required and at the time required to do the job. It is based on producing only the necessary units in the necessary quantities at the necessary time by bringing production rates exactly in line with market demand. In short, JIT means making what the market wants, when it wants it. JIT has been found to be so effective that it increases productivity, work performance and product quality, while saving costs.
JIT AND COSTS
JIT can affect the bottom line in a variety of ways. Improvement in quality and delivery times can increase demand and, thus, revenue. Costs are also affected; the JIT philosophy contends that inventory reduction and increased quality reduce costs. Traditional cost accounting Systems often makes it difficult to measure the effects of changes except in very aggregate terms. One of the tenets of JIT is to account for these effects more accurately.
Cost Accounting Systems Costs are a major factor in PIM decisions. Unfortunately, traditional cost accounting Systems often do not tell the decision maker how much a specific decision wilt affect actual expenditures. This is due to overhead costs being hidden by the allocation methods.
For example, overhead costs usually are allocated to departments (cost centres) rather than to activities, such as set-up, and inspection and maintenance operations. In addition, allocation based on the material or directs labour required to manufacture an item ignores the fact that different items are in different stages of their life cycles.
Thus, different items may have different manufacturing, engineering, and tooting costs, may have quite different quality and inspection requirements, and may require different marketing and distribution expenditures. When these costs are aggregated and allocated on the basis of the average direct labour cost of a part-as is the case with most traditional cost accounting systems-some products are allocated costs considerably below the actual expenditures required for their manufacture and distribution and others are allocated more than their true cost. Thus, decisions often are based on inaccurate information. In order to manage costs and base decisions on accurate information, the causes (source) of the expenditures must be identified. Various expenditure causes; such as set-up times, shop and purchase order processing, receiving, and material handling deserve more discussion.
These basic causes of indirect costs are called cost drivers. The cost accounting system must report the cost of these activities to accurately determine the costs of individual products. Such reporting enables manufacturing management to treat set-up, inspection, receiving, and transaction costs as direct costs, to base decisions on accurate information, and to focus on reducing high cost elements. An ABC analysis can be used to select the activities that are appropriate for cost reduction studies.
JIT, TQM, AND THE PRODUCTION PIPELINE
Think of a company as a pipeline with raw materials entering at one end and products emerging at the other.( the pipe can be extended conceptually with customer needs or orders going in at one end and products arriving to customers at the other.)
The goal is to minimize the through put time, that is to move the materials as quickly as possible Shorter throughput time is better But the pipeline varies in size and has obstructions through out. Output is determined by the narrowest part of the pipeline and the biggest obstruction.
These must be identified and then eliminated to achieve the goal. As each obstruction is eliminated the flow speeds up but only by as much as allowed by the next biggest obstruction elsewhere in the pipeline.
Identification and location of these obstructions, understanding them, and finding ways to eliminate them are the purposes of JIT and TQM. The pipeline analogy may give an impression those barriers to flow / production, once removed is gone forever. This is not true. To identify the obstruction and its precise location in itself is difficult and time consuming
Inventory as a way of avoiding problems Sources of obstructions keep changing and it could be any one of the factors of production and /or in any combination of the factors. One gets eliminated and another one crops up and therefore it has got to be continuously attended to.
The pipeline itself and the things that floe through are changing always. The diameter of the pipeline may have to be changed. But only the extent required. Over size is waste, while undersize would not meet the required throughput.
The BEST flow rate would be that which matches the required output rate. At times the pipeline itself may have to be modified or even replaced. As changing processes and products introduce whole new set of obstructions.
In short the work on the pipeline is CONTINUOUS. JIT and TQM continuously enable tinkering the pipeline so that the material coming out of the pipeline is the best possible in all respects.
JIT / TQM Difference in Organizations.
JIT /TQM greatly increase the number of people who are involved in identifying and eliminating obstructions. Every one does it Level of authority of workers to make and carry out decisions is much higher Emphasis is on measure, diagnose, and improve it.
Second difference is in the process employed to identify and prioritise problems and sources of waste
In JIT the primary process is reduction of inventory, mainly to reveal the obstructions (which were earlier hidden or ameliorated by the inventory) and prioritise them.
Just in Time Summary
Efficient Techniques Reduce Leeway (Maintaining Continuity)
1. Prepare a disaster plan, e.g. firing protection or backing-up data. He believes that the better the disaster plan, the larger chance the companies will survive after disaster. 2. Cost -reduction strategies. 3. Develop long-term continuity plan. 4. Identify critical functions and estimate the time, the company can afford without such function. 5. Identify potential alternative suppliers. 6. avoid too complicated continuity plan. 7. Evaluate risk before any decision. 8. Conducting continuity tests.
Just in Time-----Manufacturing
(1) Introduction Just in Time---manufacturing is a systems method to develop and operate a factory system. It is mainly basis on the total Decrease of waste. As you know, many people think JIT is not a new knowledge field. As a matter of fact, it has been part and plays an important role of the Japanese manufacturing industry adopted method for a long time. It requires all the materials such as equipment, human resources, and management skills are made available only in the amount required and at the time required to do the job. It is based on producing only the necessary units in the necessary quantities at the necessary time by bringing production rates exactly in line
with market demand. Generally speaking, JIT means making what the market wants. JIT has been found to be so effective that it increases productivity, work performance and product quality. What’s even more, it plays a vital role to increase productivity and decrease the total cost of manufacturing production. (2) Planning for JIT Since each manufacturing process is different, it is up to the individual company to determine the degree of appropriateness and the final application of JIT. However, it is very important to define the plan and objectives before setting up a JIT manufacturing system. It is impossible to establish a new JIT system that can be used successfully without change. Therefore, we should take serious consideration to make a plan for Just-InTime, which will benefit to our factory performance. (3) Defining the Planning JIT manufacturing system requires an understanding of the objectives of JIT, and objectives of the JIT system. After the objectives are set up for the manufacturing, the process of planning becomes one of determining what is required to meet those objectives. The goal of a JIT approach is to develop a system that allows a factory to have only the materials equipment and people by hand required doing the some plan. T o achieve this goal, we should have equipped with at least five fundamental plan: · Integrating and optimizing every step of the manufacturing process · Reducing manufacturing cost · Producing product on demand · Developing manufacturing flexibility · Produce quality product to maintain commitments and links made between Customers and Suppliers We also should keep in mind that achieving these obtaining targets does not automatically make a company a JIT manufacturer. On the contrary, it will lead to achieve even one of these objectives will prevent a manufacturer from establishing a successful JIT system. According to Common Wealth on May, 1996 report, it said that “A company cannot decide to implement JIT; they must earn the right to use JIT by revising their quality for system." (4) Reducing Manufacturing Cost
If we can design products that it will speed up and decrease manufacturing processes. Gradually, it will help us to reduce the cost of manufacturing and building the product to specifications benefit. One aspect in designing products for manufacture ability is the need to set up a good boss and employee relationship. At least, this is to cultivate and procure the resources of the production experts, and the line employees to develop cost saving solutions. Participatory quality programs utilize employee knowledge about their job functions and review the department performance. It will, finally, encourage with rewards for suggested total cost saving.
(5) Manufacturing Flexibility
According to China time report on August 1996. "Manufacturing flexibility is the ability to start new projects or the rate at which the production mix can be adjusted to meet customer demand." Planning for manufacturing flexibility requires the understanding of the elements in the manufacturing process and understanding elements in the process that restrict flexibility and improving on these areas. The unique feature of Just-In-Time is the modification from between pull and push systems. The main idea behind these approaches is that "work should not be pushed on to the next worker until that worker is ready for it." (Hauser, J.R.) As a result, manufacturing flexibility requires production managers to consider the some important factors, such as supplier lead time, production process time, process setup time and so forth. (6) Keep in touch between customers and suppliers For factory main commitment to achieving the internal structures, both customer and supplier are also playing a vital role to support JIT manufacturing. Because it is the primary requirement for developing the JIT system, each other can establish trust and honest between the supplier and the customer which is a must, since every Just-in-Time operation depends on it. Supposed, finally, it leads to failure to keep the commitments each other. Finally, it will be result to a serious form of breakdown manufacturing systems. Therefore, we should pay attention to this kind of serious call. Never be ignorant of this commitment. If we can make use of Just-In-Time
(manufacturing approaches), it, eventually, will attain those goal, which are the fundamental concept of producing product only as needed or on demand.
Kanban Just-in-Time at Toyota
When we talk about Kanban Just-In-Time, you maybe have a question which company set a very good example to fulfill this approach. The answer is Japanese company ------Toyota. Not only did Toyota take advantage of Kanban Just-In-Time, but it also get a very good benefit to operate its company. Kanban just-In-Time helps companies solving many Manufacturing problems. Kanban derives it name from the manufacturing systems and processes implemented at Toyota Motor Manufacturing that are so effective at producing at low cost, high quality, and short cycle times. As a consequence, these systems are highly flexible and responsive to customer requirements. Toyota capabilities are listed below. Kanban Just-In-Time impact on whole Toyota production approach as following: (a) Standardized work Manufacturing Cells Manufacturing Lines Facility Layout Technology Development Simulation of processes and systems (b) Quality Improvement In Process Inspection Experimental Design
Process Development (c) Continuous Improvement
Toyota manufacturing processes route the product around the plant to various work centers where work is staged to be processed. Implementing manufacturing cells typically increases net income dramatically and reduces cycle time over 50%. The cost of design and implementation is usually recovered within the first year from inventory savings. In this paper, we present the benefits of bringing the processes to the product and discuss the value of simulation as a tool to design and predict cell performance prior to implementation; therefore, reducing financial and technical risk to the company.
On September 10, 1997, Mr. Hoskins presented on "Improve Profits and Reduce Cycle Time with Manufacturing Cells and Simulation" for the National Technology University series on Kanban just-In-Time Manufacturing of this series. On October 27 - 28, 1996 Jerry Hoskins, President presented a paper titled "Developing a Lean Implementation Roadmap" at the SME Kanban Manufacturing Conference in Dearborn, Michigan. The intent of this paper is to provide information to companies on where to start with a Kanban implementation based on where one is currently manufacturing operation. His theory help our many manufactures implement all the elements of Kanban Manufacturing directed at elimination of manufacturing waste as defined by the Toyota Production System. These systems are more flexible, responsive, and profitable than traditional manufacturing systems. And, its theory also help our many participate determine where best to start with a Kanban implementation which usually involves an assessment of current operations. Once plan is developed we design the system to be implemented which may involve layout, cells, JIT, process technology, and process simulation.
Conclusion: To sum up, we should make fully use of Kanban in order to improve the performance of a production line which is under controlled by Kanban. Generally speaking, Kanban is combined with base stock or immediately improvement to create a hybrid production control system. Simulation results based on a Toyota factory show that this policy meets throughput targets with significantly lower inventories than Kanban alone. As a result, Toyota research considers a line production system which purchases raw materials from a supplier, processes them into finished products and delivers them to a buyer just in time. This study focuses on finding the optimal number of raw material orders, finished goods deliveries and Kanbans between work stations for a time-proportionate demand of finished goods.
Just In Time in Ford
In this paper, we are examining the implementation of Just-In-Time methodology in Ford for its latest small car KA; possibly one of the most interesting manufacturing revolution where companies involved in the production are integrated not only in their business processes moreover in their physical plants. The concept has been successfully developed and implemented in Valencia, Spain and is due to be adopted in other Ford production plants. The case study clearly shows how companies can work together in a harmonic and synchronised system meeting probably the most idealistic manufacturing principles (JIT) to produce the best quality product within the shortest time frame with minimum/no wastage and cost-effective to all parties. Careful production planning, cost-benefit analysis, adequate outsourcing plans and customer orientation are being praises as the key success factors of this amazing Just-In-Time concept.
FORD KA IN JUST IN TIME
Production of Ford latest small car, the Ford KA has been a dramatic improvement compared to Ford previous product, Fiesta (Kochan, 1997). This is a real example of successful JIT implementation with all its outsourcing strategies. The production target of 1,100 KA cars per day has been reached only within 8 weeks since the launch date, compared to 15 weeks required for Fiesta. Ford found that the initial bottleneck was caused by material handling, assembly time and inbound logistic. Some of the components in Fiesta are supplied by various suppliers and these components had to be made, loaded in the container and scheduled for delivery before finally delivered by trucks. This common process is found to be inefficient as every part has to be continuously handled by human and this causes big risks of damages, misplaced and imperfection in quality, especially for cosmetically sensitive and fragile parts such as instrument consoles, electrical wiring and airbags. With the new developed JIT system supported with sophisticated aerial tunnels connecting Ford with its suppliers, production lead times can be minimised, product quality can be improved, responsiveness towards customer demands can me boosted and the most important thing is inventory, space requirements, handling and transportation cost can be dramatically reduced (Kochan, 1997). Ford is now connected with more than 50 suppliers in Valencia with specifically designed aerial tunnels. These tunnels are also very useful to transport bulky and heavy items such as seats and fuel tank. The brain of this amazing system is DAD (direct automated delivery) which will integrate the whole processes virtually as one extended
manufacturing warehouse. DAD will enable a smooth manufacturing process by applying Ford scheduling system so that all the supplied components being delivered right on time they are needed. In addition, DAD and its tunnels enable the integration of manufacturing equipment so that the component being delivered can be immediately installed with the main body or other components in Ford factory.
Summary of Ford Valencia manufacturing system prior JIT implementation:
• Minimum of 15 weeks to reach full production capacity • Required at least 3,000 parts to be assembled for each car • Very small outsourcing involve for car components • All parts from suppliers are delivered on trucks • Stock must be kept at certain level to assure the continuity of production • Parts are often damaged during packaging, handling or delivery • Spent over $6 million for inefficient delivery system (250+ trucks per day) • 80 per cent automation in overall • Manual seats and battery placement and this may cause injury for employee In a dynamic market trends, pre-JIT system clearly is not responsive enough as an answer. There are minor inefficiencies throughout the system which
accumulate into serious problem that may cause Ford being less competitive in the market.
IMPROVEMENT PROCESS ANALYSIS
The main objectives of JIT are obtaining low-cost high quality products and on-time production as well as eliminating waste and stagnant stock (Svensson, 2001). Even though most of JIT implementation has similar aim and purposes, the strategies involved may differ from industry to industry or company to company. Ford has smartly chosen the right methods and strategies by reducing the barriers in relation with its suppliers. Through JIT, Ford is achieving the highest efficiency in car manufacturing industry. Its plant in Valencia has become the standard and being adopted in its other plants in many other countries. Apart from its tangible benefits such as saving on transport costs, stock/inventory costs, quicker manufacturing process and minimised risk/wastage, JIT will also bring immediate intangible benefits such as improved customer satisfaction through immediate responses and shorter timeframe to respond towards market trends.
• Only 8 weeks required to reach full production capacity • Only 1,200 parts need to be assembled, the rest have been done by its suppliers • All the outsource-viable production parts are outsourced • Automatic delivery system and aerial tunnels are developed to minimise transport • There is barely any stock required as most parts are made to order • The whole manufacturing process including the suppliers are working as one system • The need of conventional truck delivery is minimum • 98 per cent automation • Seats and battery placement are being done by automated highprecision machines There is not enough detail to measure the benefit of JIT implementation against the pre-JIT system, however from rough analysis Ford will gain the benefit immediately and get the investment back in virtually no time.
JIT COST/BENEFIT ANALYSIS FOR FORD VALENCIA
COSTS Extending outsourcing (losing control) $500 million pilot plan and analysis
• • • • • • • • • • •
BENEFITS Speed-up production process 8 weeks Smaller number or manufacturing parts Concentrating functions 25% shorter time production time needed Accuracy of production on plan Less handling = less damages / costs Less conventional transport dependent Time saving Manufacturing seamless integration Further interest from more suppliers Saving transport $6+ million per year on on core business
• • •
Building aerial tunnels Setup Direct Automated Delivery DAD $16 million delivery system
In this paper, we examined the implementation of Just-In-Time methodology in Ford for its latest small car KA; possibly one of the most interesting manufacturing revolutions where companies involved in the production are integrated not only in their business processes moreover in their physical plants. JIT has shown it success to produce the best quality product within the shortest time frame with minimum/no wastage and cost-effective to all parties. Careful production planning, cost-benefit analysis, adequate outsourcing plans and customer orientation are being praises as the key success factors of this amazing Just-In-Time concept.
An example of the use of JIT in General Motors is given below. General Motors (GM) in the USA has (approximately) 1700 suppliers who ship to 31 assembly plants scattered throughout the continental USA. These shipments total about 30 million metric tons per day and GM spends about 1,000 million dollars a year in transport costs on these shipments (1990 figures). JIT implies frequent, small, shipments. When GM moved to JIT there were simply too many (lightly loaded) trucks attempting to deliver to each assembly plant. GM's solution to this problem was to introduce consolidation centres at which full truckloads were consolidated from supplier deliveries. This obviously involved deciding how many consolidation centres to have, where they should be, their size (capacity) and which suppliers should ship to which consolidation centres (suppliers can also still ship direct to assembly plants). As of 1990 some 20% by weight of shipments go through consolidation centres and about 98% of suppliers ship at least one item through a consolidation centre. All this has been achieved without sacrificing the benefits of JIT.