You are on page 1of 6

EVIDENCE

Atty. Demetrio C. Custodio
RULE 129 SECTIONS 1 & 2 – JUDICIAL NOTICE
1. State Prosecutors vs. Muro – 236 S 505
2. Spouses Latip v Rosalie Palana Chua GR 1770!" #ct 10$ 200!
3. People vs. Rean%ares – 33& S 62&
&. People vs. 'un(a) – 3&2 S 70&
RULE 129 SECTION – JUDICIAL AD!ISSIONS
1. Ca*itan v +i(elit, GR 1636& -pril 16$ 200
2. -)uen%a vs. Metropolitan .an/ 0 'rust Co. – 271 S 1
3. Phila*)en vs. S1eet Lines$ 2nc. – 212 S 1!5
&. -lano vs. C- – 23 S 26!
5. People vs. Sola,ao – 262 SCR- 255
RULE 1"# SECTION 1 – O$JECT EVIDENCE
1. People vs. Manalo – 21! S 656
2. People vs. Mali*it – 26& S 167
3. People vs. 3u*a*o, – 221 S 333
&. People vs. +lores – 32 S &61
Ru%e 1"# SECTION 2& DOCU!ENTAR' EVIDENCE
1. .P2 v Re,es GR 157177 +e4ruar, 11$ 200
RULE 1"# SECTION " – $EST EVIDENCE RULE
1. Countr, .an/ers 2nsurance Corp v La)*an 653 S 765
2. 5ational Po1er Corporation v Co(illa GR 170&!1 -pril &$ 2007
3. .or6e vs. San(i)an4a,an – 125 S 763
&. 7i(o1s an( #rphans -ssociation$ 2nc. vs. C- – 212 S 360
5. People vs. 'an(o, – 1!2 S 2
6. Securit, .an/ an( 'rust Co. vs. 'riu*phs Lu*4er an( Construction Corp. – 301 S 537
RULE 1"# SECTION 9 – (AROL EVIDENCE RULE
1. 2ncion)$ 3r. vs. C- – 257 S 57
2. 5ational 2rri)ation -(*inistration vs. Ga*it – 215 S &36
3. Guran)o vs. 2-C – 215 S 332
&. C89 2n(ustrial an( :evelop*ent Corp. vs. C- – 272 S 333
RULE 1"# SECTION 2# – )ITNESSES
1. People vs. 'aneo – 21 S &!&
2. People vs. .alanon – 233 S 67!
3. People vs. .ai( – 336 S 656
&. People vs Lolito 9onor – 5& S 5&7
5. People vs Solo*on :ione(a – 57 S 312
RULE 1"# SECTION 22 – DIS*UALI+ICATION $' REASON O+ !ARRIA,E
1. #r(o;o vs. :a<ui)an – 62 S 270
2. People vs. Casta;e(a 3r. – S 562
RULE 1"# SECTION 2" – DEAD !AN STATUTE RULE
1. Ra%on vs. 2-C – 207 S 23&
RULE 1"# SECTION 2 – DIS*UALI+ICATION $' REASON O+ (RIVILED,ED
CO!!UNICATION
1. =S vs. -ntipolo – 37 P 726
2. Li* vs. C- – 21& S 273
3. 8rohn vs. C- – 233 S 1&6
&. +ortich vs. C- – 26 S 152
RULE 1"# SECTION 2- – AD!ISSIONS O+ A (ART'
1. People vs. -)ustin – 2&0 S 5&1
2. 'uason vs. C- – 2&1 S 6!5
3. People vs. Chua =, – 327 S 335
&. People vs. Cepe(a – 32& S 2!0
RULE 1"# SECTION 2. – O++ER O+ CO!(RO!ISE NOT AD!ISSI$LE
1. People vs. Lase – 21! S 5&
2. 'rans Paci>ic 2n(ustrial Supplies$ 2nc. vs. C- – 235 S &!&
3. People vs. .ue*io – 265 S 52
&. People vs. -*aca – 277 S 215
RULE 1"# SECTION "# – AD!ISSION $' CONS(IRATOR
1. People vs. Con(e*ena – 23 S !10
2. People vs. Provo – 37 S 1!
3. People vs. Puesca – 7 S 130
RULE 1"# SECTION "2 – AD!ISSION $' SILENCE
1. =S vs. .a, – 27 P &!5
RULE 1"# SECTION "" – CON+ESSION
1. People vs. -)ustin – 2&0 S 5&1
2. People vs. 'io%on – 1! S 36
3. People vs. 'u6on – 215 S 55!
&. People vs La(ao – GR 100!&0?&1 5ove*4er 27$ 2001
5. People vs @ncipi(o – 1&6 S &7
2
6. People vs 3an6alani – 63! S 157
RULE 1"# SECTION "- – /EARSA' RULE
1. People vs. Aalero – 112 S 661
2. People vs. :a*aso ? 212 S 5&7
3. -)caoli vs. Molina – 2&! S &2
&. People vs. .rioso – 37 S 336
RULE 1"# SECTION ". – D'IN, DECLARATION
1. People vs. :e 3o,a – 203 S 3&3
2. People vs. :uni) – 215 S &6!
3. People vs. -*aca – 277 S 215
&. =S vs. -ntipolo – 37 P 726
RULE 1"# SECTION 2 – (ART O+ T/E RES ,ESTAE
1. People vs. 'io%on – 1! S 36
2. People vs. 5aran6a – 10 P 71
3. People vs. Palo*ones – 336 S 0
&. People vs. Ra<uel – 265 S 2&
RULE 1"# SECTION – ENTRIES IN O++ICIAL RECORDS
1. People vs. .ernal(e% – 2!& S 317
2. People vs. :ivina – 221 S 20!
3. People vs. Leones – 117 S 32
&. People vs. Crisosto*o – 160 S &7
5. +eria vs. C- – 325 S 525
RULE 1"# SECTION . – TESTI!ON' OR DE(OSITION AT A +OR!ER
(ROCEEDIN,
1. :e Leon vs. People – 210 S 151
RULE 1"# SECTION 0 – O(INION RULE
1. Li* vs. C- – 21& S 273 BsupraC
2. People vs. Galleno – 2!1 S 762
RULE 1"# SECTION 9 – O(INION O+ E1(ERT )ITNESS
1. Ce4u Ship,ar( an( @n)ineerin) 7or/s$ 2nc. vs. 7illia* Lines$ 2nc. – 306 S 762
RULE 1"1 SECTION 1 – $URDEN O+ (ROO+
1. 3i*ene% vs. 5LRC – 256 S &
2. Mallari vs. C- – 265 S &56
RULE 1"1 SECTION " – DIS(UTA$LE (RESU!(TIONS
3
1. Lo%ano vs. :e Los Santos – 27& S &5
2. LR' vs. 5ativi(a( – 3!7 S 75
3. :el San 'ransport Lines vs. C0- Const. 2nc. – &12 S 52&
&. People vs. :e Gu%*an – 22! S 7!5
5. People vs. 5ava6a – 220 S 62&
6. People vs. Casta;e(a – 252 S 2&7
7. People vs. Si*4ulan – 21& S 537
. People vs. .allu(a – 31 S 503
RULE 1"2 SECTION " – RI,/TS AND O$LI,ATIONS O+ A )ITNESS
2IN RELATION TO T/E RI,/T A,AINST SEL+&INCRI!INATION3
1. People vs. Salveron – 22 S !2
2. People vs. Mali*it – 26& S 167 BsupraC
RULE 1"2 SECTION – ORDER IN T/E E1A!INATION O+ AN INDIVIDUAL
)ITNESS
1. .achrach Motors Co. 2nc. vs. C2R – 6 S 27
2. People vs. Pa(ero – 226 S 10
RULE 1"2 SECTION 1# – LEADIN, AND !ISLEADIN, *UESTIONS
1. People vs. Caparas – 111 S 6
RULE 1"2 SECTION 1" – /O) )ITNESS I!(EAC/ED $' EVIDENCE O+
INCONSISTENT STATE!ENTS
1. =S vs. .alu,ot – &0 P 35
2. People vs. Relucio – 6 S 227
3. People vs. 7inston :e Gu%*an – 2 S 3&6
RULE 1"2 SECTION 19 – CLASSES O+ DOCU!ENTS
1. 3oson vs. .alta%ar – 1!& S 11&
2. Sales vs. C- – 211 S 5
3. Lucente vs. @van)elista$ 3r. – 3!6 S 627
&. Dturral(e vs. -%urin – 2 S &07
ELECTRONIC EVIDENCE Bas >unctional e<uivalent o> (ocu*entar, evi(enceC
Rea(E MC 2n(ustrial Corp v Ssan),on) GR 170633$ #cto4er 17$ 2007
RULE 1"2 SECTION 2# – (ROO+ O+ (RIVATE DOCU!ENT
1. Ra% vs. 2-C – 1& S 720
2. #n) vs. People – 3&2 S 372
4
RULE 1"2 SECTION 22 – /O) ,ENUINENESS O+ /AND)RITIN, (ROVED
1. La,no vs. People – 213 S 66
2. 3aco4 vs. C- – 22& S 1!
3. Securit, .an/ an( 'rust Co. vs. 'riu*ph Lu*4er an( Construction Corp. – 301 S
537 BsupraC
&. S, vs. C- – 330 S 550
RULE 1"2 SECTION 2" – (U$LIC DOCU!ENTS AS EVIDENCE
1. Realu4it v 3aso 65 S 1&6
2. Man%ano 3r v Garcia 661 S 16
RULE 1"2 SECTION " – O++ER O+ EVIDENCE
1. 9eirs o> Car*en Cru%?Fa*ora v Multi1oo( 2nternational 2nc GR 1&6&2$ 3anuar,
1!$ 200!
2. 9eirs o> Pasa) v Spouses Parocha et al GR 155&3 -pril 27$ 2007
3. Catuira vs. C- – 236 S 3!
&. A(a. (e #nate vs. C- – 250 S 23
5. S, vs. C- – 330 S 550 BsupraC
6. Macasira, vs. People – 2!1 S 15&
7. 'uason vs. C- – 2&1 S 6!5
. Can(i(o an( Ru*4aua vs. C- – 253 S 7
!. People vs. .arellano – 31! S 567
10. People vs. Sanche% – 30 S 26&
RULE 1""
SECTION 1 – (RE(ONDERANCE O+ EVIDENCE4 /O) DETER!INED
SECTION 2 – (ROO+ $E'OND REASONA$LE DOU$T
1. :.P Pool o> -ccre(ite( 2nsurance Co*panies vs Ra(io Min(anao 5et1or/ GR
1&703!$ 3an 27$ 2006
2. @ncinas v 5ational .oo/ Store GR 16270&$ 5ove*4er 1!$ 200&
3. People vs Aillarico GR 15362$ -pril &$ 2011
&. People vs. Me6ia – 55 S &53
5. People vs. Matri*onio – 215 S 613
6. People vs. Gon(ora – 265 S &0
7. People vs. Ca4iles – 2& S 207
. People vs. Loren%o – 2&0 S 62&
!. People vs. Ri)o(on – 23 S 27
10. 'in vs. People – 362 S 5!&
RULE 1"" SECTION – CIRCU!STANTIAL EVIDENCE4 )/EN SU++ICIENT
1. People v -ntica*ara GR 17771$ 3une $ 2011
2. People vs. Salva*e – 270 S 766
3. People vs. Mali*it – 26& S 167 BsupraC
&. People vs. Ra*os – 2&0 S 1!1
5
5. People vs. -(o>ina – 23! S 67
RULE 1"" SECTION 5 – SU$STANTIAL EVIDENCE
1. -n) 'i4a, vs. C2R – 6! P 635
2. .ascos v 'a)anahan GR 10666$ +e4ruar, 1$ 200!
3. +a4ella vs. C- – 22 S 256
&. P-L vs. 5LRC – 263 S 63
5. Ailla>lor vs. C- – 20 S 2!7
6