The Moon

18 October 2013
1 Comment


The Committee goes to The Moon, sent by seven reader questions.

1. From where does our Moon originate?
2. Is it of the same structure as our planet i.e., does it have a hot, molten core of Iron?
3. Is there life equivalent to human life on the Moon?
4. Have we humans indeed actually landed on the surface of the Moon?
5. Will we humans eventually colonize the Moon?
6. Do earth astronauts regularly make contact with extra terrestrials when we venture into
space?
7. If astronauts made any contact with extra terrestrials when venturing into space, what
were their responses?

They say:
1) This satellite, in orbit around Earth, was created at the same time, simultaneously. It has
been a partner and companion since the beginning.
2) No, It has no magnetic field in extension outward and around itself, as does Earth and many
other planets and their satellites in our solar system. It does not generate thermal effect from
within, as does Earth.
3) No. There has never been this. Your moon is visited often and there are many beings of
dimensions you do not perceive, that make these visits also, yet no life upon it or within. No
biological organisms, no beings of energy that remain permanently. We must say, the Earth
notion of residing, staying, living and remaining in a place applies but on Earth, in the way
humans practice it. The many civilizations called nomadic resemble more the existence you the
many shall have in your true, real and permanent home. There is no requirement or benefit
served by remaining in one place or moving about, however it can be done and is an option
chosen, yet it is not required. In this way there are regular visitors to the moon, but none that
reside in the way humans perceive and practice themselves.
4) Yes.
5) No.
6) The extraterrestrials make contact with astronauts and cosmonauts, however the contact is
not recognized or simply blocked, veiled or shielded. Human ventures above your atmosphere
and to other planets are of a keen interest and fascination we cannot describe the interest and
enjoyment in words or sentences humans customarily utilize. Even your probes and machines
send to pass by, orbit or land upon other planets and satellites are of enormous satisfaction to see,
just to see them sent.
7) Astronauts do not initiate contact with extraterrestrials, and many have suggested upon
contact with key Earth leaders, that no such contact would be answered, none would generate a
response. This is understood by the humans contacted as not necessary; the extraterrestrials have
already contacted humanity on Earth. To do so on Earth does nothing more for the process,
serves no additional purpose.

C: "We speak of the Moon generally; as the planets and satellites of your solar system were
created, some became satellites of the central star and other fell into revolution about the planets,
the satellites of the star, what you call your sun. The arrangements of the many solar systems
have similar patterns, and the density of planets is the relative heaviness of some materials
within; we suggest the settlement of heavier components of a solution and the rise of the lighter;
cream on top of milk, oil floating upon water's surface. This pattern caused many formations of
planets with more solid, by comparison, centers. The distribution is similar to the eddy current in
water; as the rotating spinning mass traveled, the materials that became the central star were
gaseous as you call them, lighter in your dimensions, and these grouped to form the star and fuel
the reaction that produces heat, light and radiation. The heavier portions coalesced and were
flung farther out; the smaller and heavier, such as Earth and Mars and Astros, your Asteroid Belt,
contained sufficient relative mass to create a small effect within, and have a denser, hot core.
Other, such as your outer planets, more gaseous and less dense yet larger, were flung farther
before they coalesced into a spherical shape created by their own magnetic pull and were
themselves drawn into orbit. The many moons about the planets were the result of a similar
process.

Atmospheres of gas with a solid, clearly defined hard surface containing liquids and gases
surrounding them are the result of combinations of materials some planets have and others did
not. These gaseous and liquid materials are fragile by comparison and can be lost, as happened
with Mars. Planets can also be destroyed by impacts. Astros was demolished in such an
incident."


Comments
cristina
18/10/2013 1:31pm
fascinating the last bit :) - made me think about physics and quantum mechanics

question 4 and part of 6 are in archive too ;) "Apollo 11"