596 views

Uploaded by ataghassemi

Numerical Solution 2D Heat Equation by ADI and SLOR methods

- Heat Conduction in 2 and 3 Dimensions
- Partial Differential Equations in MATLAB
- 2-D Mathematical Modeling of Boron Carbide Manufacturing Process
- Heat Transfer with Matlab
- 1st Project-2D HT in SQR Plate with MATLAB.pdf
- 2D Heat Equation Code Report
- Matlab Heat Transfer
- 2-D Navier Stokes Solver
- Heat Transfer
- heat transfer Project
- Numerical Solutions for 1D Conduction using the Finite Volume Method
- Numerical Methods in Heat Mass Momentum Transfer (Lecture Notes)JayathiMurthy
- Numerical Two Dimensional Transient Heat Conduction Using Finite Element
- Computational Heat Transfer, VOL1; Mathematical Modelling_1995.pdf
- Finite Different Method - Heat Transfer - Using Matlab
- Andrew F. Bennett - Inverse Modeling of the Ocean and Atmosphere
- CAD-CAM
- Numerical Fluid Mechanics
- mit18086_navierstokes
- Fluid Mechanics and Thermodynamics of Tur (1)

You are on page 1of 25

Numerical Solution of 2D Heat

Equation by ADI and SLOR methods

Computational Fluid Dynamics Course Assignment

Instructor: Dr. Jahangirian

Ata Ghasemi Esfahani

student ID: 92129071

W I N T E R 2 0 1 4

2

Contents

1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 3

2. Problem definition ............................................................................................................... 3

3. Discretization of 2D heat equation and MATLAB codes ............................................................. 4

3.1 ADI method ................................................................................................................... 4

3.2 SLOR method ................................................................................................................. 8

4. Results and discussion .........................................................................................................12

4.1 ADI method .................................................................................................................. 12

4.2 SLOR method ................................................................................................................ 21

4.3 Discussion ..................................................................................................................... 24

5. References .........................................................................................................................25

3

1. Introduction

This report summarizes the results obtained from implementation of various implicit methods

for solving two-dimensional heat conduction equation with a specific set of boundary and

initial conditions.

The most crucial advantage associated with explicit method is its relative ease of

implementation. On the other hand, in order for the solution to be stable, for a fixed value of

x, one must consider limited values of t such that the stability criteria are met. This usually

results in long computer run times. Implicit methods often maintain stability even for much

larger values of t, but the massive matrix manipulations needed at each time step which

results in an increase in computation time. Also the implicit methods might not be as accurate

in yielding transient solutions since truncation error is large.

The methods investigated in this assignment, namely ADI and SLOR, have been devised to

take advantage of the so-called tri-diagonal matrix solution method that can be coded and

implemented easily. Instead of attempting to manipulate massive matrices, the ADI method

resorts to a method called two-level solution. This approach ensures that at each time step,

there are no more than three unknowns to solve for thus the tri-diagonal solution routine, also

known as Thomas algorithm, can be employed.

The SLOR (SOR by line, where SOR stands for successive over-relaxation) is a line-iterative

method. Although relaxation techniques can be formulated in explicit or implicit forms, the

specific discretization form presented here is implicit and again, relies on Thomas algorithm

for matrix manipulations. Within this framework, some quantities are assumed to be known

at initial iterative step and some other are updated as the iterative solution progresses.

Although both the ADI and SLOR methods are classified as implicit methods, care must be

taken in selecting grid size and time steps. As will be seen in what follows, careful selection

of the mentioned parameters will result in a physically sound solution and improper selection

of those yields inappropriate results.

2. Problem definition

Constant

Temperature

T=100 C

Constant

Temperature

T=100 C

Constant

Temperature

T=300 C

Constant

Temperature

T=0 C

4

3. Discretization of 2D heat equation and MATLAB codes

3.1 ADI method

The unsteady two-dimensional heat conduction equation (parabolic form) has the following

form:

A forward time, central space scheme is employed to discretize the governing equation as

described in the next page.

The idea of the ADI-method (alternating direction implicit) is to alternate direction and thus

solve two one-dimensional problem at each time step. The first step keeps y-direction fixed:

In the second step we keep x-direction fixed:

The ADI calculation procedure is depicted in the figure below:

Both equations can be written in a triadiagonal form. If we define:

5

Then we get:

Instead of five-band matrix in BTCS method, here each time step can be obtained in two

sweeps. Each sweep can be done by solving a tri-diagonal system of equations. The ADI

method is second order accurate with a T.E. of the order O[ t

2

, x

2

, y

2

]. The amplification

factor is as follows:

Where

It is obvious that this method is unconditionally stable, although the 3D ADI scheme is only

conditionally stable.

The first step of the ADI scheme is reduced to the following form that can be implemented as

a MATLAB code:

AT

I-1,j

n+1/2

BT

I,j

n+1/2

+AT

i+1,j

n+1/2

= K

i

Where:

A= (t/2x

2

)

B= 1+ (t/x

2

)

K

i

= -T

i,j

n

- (t/2x

2

) [ T

i,j+1

n

-2T

i,j

n

+T

i,j-1

n

]

The second step of the ADI scheme is implemented as follows:

CT

I-1,j

n+1/2

DT

I,j

n+1/2

+CT

i+1,j

n+1/2

= K

i

6

Where:

C= (t/2y

2

)

D= 1+ (t/y

2

)

L

j

= -T

i

n+1/2

- (t/2x

2

) [ T

i+1,j+

n+1/2

-2T

i,j

n+1/2

+T

i-1,j

n+1/2

]

The matrix formed has the following form:

The MATLAB code written to solve the 2D diffusion equation by ADI method can be seen

below:

%Heat equation solution by ADI method

% by Ata Ghasemi Esfahani 92129071

clear all

clc

% constants

alfa=0.02;

dt=0.5;

dx=0.2;

dy=0.2;

a=(alfa*dt)/(2*dx^2);

b=1+2*a;

al=(alfa*dt)/(2*dy^2);

bl=1+2*a;

m=10;

n=10000;

%initial conditions

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

for j=2:m

for i=2:m

te(j,i)=0;

end

end

Initial conditions: zero temperature

throughout the domain

7

%boundary conditions

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

for i=1:m+1

te(1,i)=300;

te(m+1,i)=0;

end

for j=2:m+1

te(j,1)=100;

te(j,m+1)=100;

end

te(:,:)

% formation of matrix A

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

for j=1:m

for i=1:m

if (i==j)

ma(j,i)=-b;

end

if (i==j+1)

ma(j,i)=a;

end

if (i==j-1)

ma(j,i)=a;

end

end

end

for t=1:n

for j1=2:m

for i=2:m

k(i-1)=-te(j-1,i)-((alfa*dt)/(2*dy^2))*(te(j-1,i+1)-

2*te(j-1,i)+te(j-1,i-1));

end

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

%Thomas Algorithm

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

md(1,1)=-b;

for j=1:m-1

for i=1:m-1

if (j~=1)

if (i==j)

md(j,i)=ma(j,i)-md(j-1,i)*a/md(j-1,j-1);

end

end

if (i==j+1)

md(j,i)=a;

end

end

end

Boundary

conditions

Formation of coefficients

matrix

8

for i=2:9

k(i)=k(i)-k(i-1)*a/md(i-1,i-1);

end

te(j1,m)=k(m-1)/md(m-1,m-1);

for i=1:m-2

i=m-i;

te(j1,i)=(k(i-1)-a*te(j1,i+1))/md(i-1,i-1);

end

end

for i=2:m

for j=2:m

l(j-1)=-te(j,i-1)-((alfa*dt)/(2*dx^2))*(te(j+1,i-1)-

2*te(j,i-1)+te(j-1,i-1));

end

for i=2:9

l(i)=l(i)-l(i-1)*a/md(i-1,i-1);

end

te(m,i)=l(m-1)/md(m-1,m-1);

for j=1:m-2

j=m-j;

te(j,i)=(l(j-1)-a*te(j+1,i))/md(j-1,j-1);

end

end

end

3.2 SLOR method

Assuming the 2D steady heat equation has the following form (Laplace's equation):

9

We now have to describe the SLOR method. The general idea behind successive over-

relaxation method, also classified as an iterative method, is to introduce an arbitrary

correction to the intermediate values of the unknown considered in the following way:

where k denotes iteration level, u

i,j

k+1

is the most recent value of u

i,,j

calculated from the

Gauss-Seidel procedure, u

i,j

k'

is the value from the previous iteration as adjusted by previous

application of this formula if the over-relaxation is being applied successively (at each

iteration), and u

i,j

k+1'

is the newly adjusted or "better guess" for u

i,,j

, at the k + 1 iteration level.

That is, we expect u

i,j

k+1'

to be closer to the final solution than the unaltered value u

i,j

k+1

from

the Gauss-Seidel calculation.

Here, w is the relaxation parameter, and when 1 < w < 2, overrelaxation is being employed.

For Laplace's equation on a rectangular domain with Dirichlet boundary conditions, theories

pioneered by Young (1954) and Frankel (1950) lead to an expression for the optimum w

(hereafter denoted by w

op

,). First, defining as:

and the optimum w is given by:

To illustrate the procedure, consider the solution to Laplaces equation on a square domain

with Dirichlet boundary conditions using the five-point scheme. If we agree to start at the

bottom of the square and sweep up by rows, we could write, for the general point:

Alternatively, the over-relaxation parameter w can be introduced prior to solution of the

simultaneous algebraic equations. This is done by substituting the over-relaxation scheme

introduced earlier into the above equation. The result is:

The above equation is then solved for each row by Thomas algorithm. The graphic depiction

of the procedure can be seen in the figure below:

10

For the specified conditions of our problem, is equal to 1 and w

opt

is calculated to be 1.989.

The MATLAB code can be seen in the following pages:

%Heat equation solution by SLOR method

%by Ata Ghasemi Esfahani 92129071

clear all

clc

%Constants

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

omega=1.989;

a=-omega/4;

m=10;

iteration=1000;

%Initial conditions

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

for t=1:iteration

for j=1:m

for i=1:m

te(t,j,i)=0;

end

end

end

%Boundary conditions

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

for t=1:iteration+1

for i=1:m+1

te(t,1,i)=300;

te(t,m+1,i)=0;

end

end

Solution domain

increments

11

for t=1:iteration+1

for j=2:m+1

te(t,j,1)=100;

te(t,j,m+1)=100;

end

end

te2(:,:)=te(iteration,:,:);

te2(:,:)

%formation of matrix A

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

for j=1:m

for i=1:m

if (i==j)

ma(j,i)=1;

end

if (i==j+1)

ma(j,i)=a;

end

if (i==j-1)

ma(j,i)=a;

end

end

end

for t=1:iteration

for j=2:m

for i=2:m

k(i-1)=(1-omega)*te(t,j,i-1)+te(t,j+1,i-1)+te(t+1,j-1,i-

1);

end

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

%Thomas Algorithm

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

md(1,1)=1;

for j1=1:m-1

for i=1:m-1

if (j1~=1)

if (i==j1)

md(j1,i)=ma(j1,i)-(a^2)/md(j1-1,i);

end

end

if (i==j1+1)

md(j1,i)=a;

end

end

end

for i=2:9

k(i)=k(i)-k(i-1)*a/md(i-1,i-1);

end

te(t,j,m)=k(m-1)/md(m-1,m-1);

for i=1:m-1

Formation of coefficients

matrix

12

i=m-i;

te(t,j,i)=(k(i)-a*te(t,j,i+1))/md(i,i);

end

end

end

te1(:,:)=te(iteration,:,:);

4. Results and discussion

4.1 ADI method

The results of the numerical procedure are presented in this section. Temperature

distributions in the domain are presented so that the reader is able to compare the

consequences of introducing various changes to the problem. In what follows n denotes the

time level.

Fig. 1 Temperature distribution, ADI method, x = 0.1, n = 5, t = 0.1

13

Fig. 2 Temperature distribution, ADI method, x = 0.1, n = 5, t = 0.5

Fig. 3 Temperature distribution, ADI method, x = 0.2, n = 5, t = 0.1

14

Fig. 3 Temperature distribution, ADI method, x = 0.2, n = 5, t = 0.5

Fig. 4 Temperature distribution, ADI method, x = 0.1, n = 30, t = 0.1

15

Fig. 4 Temperature distribution, ADI method, x = 0.1, n = 50, t = 0.1

Fig. 5 Temperature distribution, ADI method, x = 0.1, n = 100, t = 0.1

16

Fig. 6 Temperature distribution, ADI method, x = 0.1, n = 1000, t = 0.1

Fig. 7 Temperature distribution, ADI method, x = 0.2, n = 1000, t = 0.1

17

Fig. 8 Temperature distribution, ADI method, x = 0.2, n = 1000, t = 0.5

300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300

100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100

100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100

100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100

100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100

100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100

100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100

100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100

100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100

100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100

100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100

Fig. 9 Temperature distribution, ADI method, x = 0.1, n = 1, t = 0.1, solution matrix

18

Columns 1 through 7

300.0000 300.0000 300.0000 300.0000 300.0000 300.0000 300.0000

100.0000 274.8239 297.8872 299.8227 299.9850 299.9975 299.9850

100.0000 49.8107 49.6214 49.4322 49.2429 49.0536 48.8643

100.0000 49.8107 49.6214 49.4322 49.2429 49.0536 48.8643

100.0000 49.8107 49.6214 49.4322 49.2429 49.0536 48.8643

100.0000 49.8107 49.6214 49.4322 49.2429 49.0536 48.8643

100.0000 49.8107 49.6214 49.4322 49.2429 49.0536 48.8643

100.0000 49.8107 49.6214 49.4322 49.2429 49.0536 48.8643

100.0000 49.8107 49.6214 49.4322 49.2429 49.0538 48.8666

100.0000 49.8107 49.6214 49.4322 49.2429 49.0538 48.8666

100.0000 0 0 0 0 0 0

Columns 8 through 11

300.0000 300.0000 300.0000 300.0000

299.8227 198.0254 274.8239 100.0000

48.6750 102.3387 49.2429 100.0000

48.6750 58.3989 49.2429 100.0000

48.6750 49.9288 49.2429 100.0000

48.6750 48.8138 49.2429 100.0000

48.6750 48.6585 49.2429 100.0000

48.6750 48.3911 49.2429 100.0000

48.7019 46.3765 49.2695 100.0000

48.7019 34.8840 49.2695 100.0000

0 0 0 100.0000

Fig. 10 Temperature distribution, ADI method, x = 0.1, n = 1000, t = 0.1, solution matrix

19

Columns 1 through 7

300.0000 300.0000 300.0000 300.0000 300.0000 300.0000 300.0000

100.0000 292.8531 299.8297 299.9959 299.9999 300.0000 299.9999

100.0000 49.9931 49.9863 49.9794 49.9726 49.9657 49.9588

100.0000 49.9931 49.9863 49.9794 49.9726 49.9657 49.9588

100.0000 49.9931 49.9863 49.9794 49.9726 49.9657 49.9588

100.0000 49.9931 49.9863 49.9794 49.9726 49.9657 49.9588

100.0000 49.9931 49.9863 49.9794 49.9726 49.9657 49.9588

100.0000 49.9931 49.9863 49.9794 49.9726 49.9657 49.9588

100.0000 49.9931 49.9863 49.9794 49.9726 49.9657 49.9588

100.0000 49.9931 49.9863 49.9794 49.9726 49.9657 49.9588

100.0000 0 0 0 0 0 0

Columns 8 through 11

300.0000 300.0000 300.0000 300.0000

299.9959 264.7318 292.8531 100.0000

49.9520 70.9772 49.9726 100.0000

49.9520 50.9738 49.9726 100.0000

49.9520 49.9887 49.9726 100.0000

49.9520 49.9531 49.9726 100.0000

49.9520 49.9518 49.9726 100.0000

49.9520 49.9442 49.9726 100.0000

49.9520 49.7358 49.9726 100.0000

49.9520 45.4135 49.9726 100.0000

0 0 0 100.0000

Fig. 11 Temperature distribution, ADI method, x = 0.2, n = 1000, t = 0.1, solution matrix

Columns 1 through 7

300.0000 300.0000 300.0000 300.0000 300.0000 300.0000 300.0000

20

100.0000 219.6133 278.4530 294.1989 298.3425 299.1713 298.3425

100.0000 48.7815 47.5629 46.3444 45.1258 43.9073 42.6887

100.0000 48.7815 47.5629 46.3444 45.1258 43.9073 42.6887

100.0000 48.7815 47.5629 46.3444 45.1258 43.9073 42.6887

100.0000 48.7815 47.5629 46.3444 45.1258 43.9073 42.6887

100.0000 48.7815 47.5629 46.3444 45.1258 43.9073 42.6887

100.0000 48.7815 47.5629 46.3444 45.1258 43.9073 42.6887

100.0000 48.7821 47.5655 46.3540 45.1619 44.0419 43.1912

100.0000 48.7821 47.5655 46.3540 45.1619 44.0419 43.1912

100.0000 0 0 0 0 0 0

Columns 8 through 11

300.0000 300.0000 300.0000 300.0000

294.1989 132.3841 219.6133 100.0000

41.4702 99.9029 45.1258 100.0000

41.4702 84.3623 45.1258 100.0000

41.4702 60.1294 45.1258 100.0000

41.4702 47.9626 45.1258 100.0000

41.4702 42.2473 45.1258 100.0000

41.4702 37.2052 45.1258 100.0000

43.3455 28.5179 46.8756 100.0000

43.3455 16.2208 46.8756 100.0000

0 0 0 100.0000

Fig. 12 Temperature distribution, ADI method, x = 0.1, n = 1000, t = 0.5, solution matrix

21

4.2 SLOR method

Fig. 13 Temperature distribution, SLOR method, x = 0.1, iteration level = 1000, w=1.989

Fig. 14 Temperature distribution, SLOR method, x = 0.05, iteration level = 1000, w=1.989

22

Fig. 14 Temperature distribution, SLOR method, x = 0.0025, iteration level = 1000, w=1.989

Fig. 15 Temperature distribution, SLOR method, x = 0.05, iteration level = 1000, w=1.5

23

Fig. 16 Temperature distribution, SLOR method, x = 0.05, iteration level = 1000, w=1.2

Fig. 17 Temperature distribution, SLOR method, x = 0.05, iteration level = 1000, w=1.15

24

4.3 Discussion

Although both methods are stable, careful examination of the ADI method results indicates

that:

1. Increasing the time steps would speed up the convergence to final state

2. Increasing the size of the grid prevents us from seeing the accurate temperature

distributions that we would see otherwise.

3. With the same grid size and time and same time level, bigger time steps yield different

results.

4. The code is biased from left to right, in other words the boundary conditions from the left

side of the domain propagate through the domain faster than the boundary conditions on the

right.

5. The computation time does not increase significantly with time steps that are in the order

of convergence time step.

It must be mentioned that the time step n was changed manually to observe temperature

variations but the code converged at 976 steps.

The SLOR method, on the other hand, presented physically unacceptable results. It can be

observed that:

1. At the same iteration level, using smaller mesh net results in the diminishment of the

region that has a higher temperature than that of the boundaries.

2. Although the optimum relaxation factor calculated according to [1] is 1.989, reducing the

relaxation factor results in more acceptable results in terms of the physical reality of the

problem.

3. Increasing the iteration levels exponentially increases the computation time, although

even at 1000 iterations, the code has not converged yet.

Therefore, by comparing the results obtained from ADI and SLOR methods it is found that

the ADI method, although a little bit harder to code,

1. Yields realistic results

2. Significantly reduces the computation time

3. Converges much more quickly

25

5. References

[1] Computational Fluid Mechanics and Heat Transfer, John C. Tannehil, Dale A. Anderson,

Richard H. Pletcher, Seond Edition, Taylor and Francis, 1997

[2] Computational Fluid Dynamics: The Basics with Applications, John D. Anderson,

McGraw-Hill, 1995

- Heat Conduction in 2 and 3 DimensionsUploaded bybogdyronnie
- Partial Differential Equations in MATLABUploaded byAsterix
- 2-D Mathematical Modeling of Boron Carbide Manufacturing ProcessUploaded byrakesh
- Heat Transfer with MatlabUploaded byMehdi Rabbani
- 1st Project-2D HT in SQR Plate with MATLAB.pdfUploaded byAhmadreza Aminian
- 2D Heat Equation Code ReportUploaded bySebastian Torres Montoya
- Matlab Heat TransferUploaded byOmar Najm
- 2-D Navier Stokes SolverUploaded byRohith Jayasimha Rao
- Heat TransferUploaded bysatish448
- heat transfer ProjectUploaded bysubratoraj
- Numerical Solutions for 1D Conduction using the Finite Volume MethodUploaded byAaron Outhwaite
- Numerical Methods in Heat Mass Momentum Transfer (Lecture Notes)JayathiMurthyUploaded byapi-3803751
- Numerical Two Dimensional Transient Heat Conduction Using Finite ElementUploaded bysam_kamali85
- Computational Heat Transfer, VOL1; Mathematical Modelling_1995.pdfUploaded byAhmadreza Aminian
- Finite Different Method - Heat Transfer - Using MatlabUploaded byLe Cong Lap
- Andrew F. Bennett - Inverse Modeling of the Ocean and AtmosphereUploaded byvladislav
- CAD-CAMUploaded byAditya Nag
- Numerical Fluid MechanicsUploaded byAkira Tamashiro
- mit18086_navierstokesUploaded byhlkatk
- Fluid Mechanics and Thermodynamics of Tur (1)Uploaded byMK Angel Ruiz
- Computational-Aeroacoustics-A-Wave-Number-Approach.pdfUploaded byIdul Azharul Hoque
- Coding Submitting MATLABUploaded bySaurabhpatange
- CFD (AE2402) Unit Question Bank (5 UNITS)Uploaded byKumaranCool
- A TWO DIMENSIONAL EULER FLOW SOLVER ON ADAPTIVE CARTESIAN GRIDSUploaded bybsiyahhan
- UT Dallas Syllabus for phys5416.501 06s taught by Xinchou Lou (xinchou)Uploaded byUT Dallas Provost's Technology Group
- Numerical Analysis Chap 1Uploaded byGibs Rivera
- New Microsoft Word Document (3)Uploaded byrahul
- Numerical Methods for Partial Differential Equations. Finite Difference and Finite Volume MethodsUploaded byED DK KA
- Solution to Diffusion and Heat Conduction EquationsUploaded byjmckenziet
- ANSYS IntroductionUploaded byZahid Hussain

- Principles of Technical Photography and PhotoinstrumentationUploaded byataghassemi
- Mir Hardware HeritageUploaded byBob Andrepont
- AIAA-2011-6008Uploaded byataghassemi
- 12-Numerical and Experimental Analysis of Plasma FlowUploaded byataghassemi
- Matlab Codes for Method of CharacteristicsUploaded byaeroacademic

- Explicit and Implicit MethodsUploaded byAhmedMohamedTahaGabAllah
- Carcione et. al. 2002 Seismic modeling.pdfUploaded byИнженер Луис А. Гарсиа
- 2018 III Ing Civil Matematica III( List 10)bUploaded byRichar Ivan Saldaña Bustamante
- Differences Between Implicit and Explicit Finite Element Method _ IMechanicaUploaded byJohn Chiv
- ht_13Uploaded bySunilkumar Reddy
- Comparison of Implicit and Explicit ProceduresUploaded byNrl Syafini
- CA Aa214b Ch6Uploaded bymixigali
- Simulation of Steady and Unsteady - Flows in Channels and RiversUploaded byRichard
- Assumptions in the Capacity Spectrum MethodUploaded byMoniruzzaman Moni
- 2D Finite Difference MethodUploaded byAnupEkbote
- On the Use of Spreadsheets in Heat Conduction AnalysisUploaded byCABean1
- 7 DynamicsUploaded byXingfang91
- NTU, adsorptionUploaded byabhi_mohit2005
- Development of Implicit Methods in CFD NASA Ames Research Center 1970s–1980sUploaded byArias Espada Roberto
- A1 Computational Heat Conduction 10Uploaded byAmit Kumar
- Introduction of LS-DYNAUploaded byYaneng Zhou
- NX Nastran 8 Advanced Nonlinear Theory and Modeling GuideUploaded byMSC Nastran Beginner
- Solid Waste LandfillsUploaded bycsrajmohan2924
- Numerical Methods in Geotechnical EngineeringUploaded byHebrews13V8
- Newmark IntegrationUploaded byAhmed Buaishi
- Dinamica trad.Uploaded byCesar Chacon
- A+three+dimensional+implicit+immersed+boundary+method+with+application.pdfUploaded byPunnamChandar Bitla
- Lecture 14Uploaded byYamaneko Shin
- Heat EquationUploaded byAshish As
- Programming for Computations –MATLAB/OctaveUploaded byalfonso lopez alquisirez
- pspice_bctm98-MSsimUploaded byrmmati
- Simulating Drop Tests in Solid WorksUploaded byrajeshdhang
- PDE of Parabolic TypeUploaded bylambdaStudent_epl
- Week 15 - Explicit vs ImplicitUploaded bysksiddique
- Numerical Methods in Heat ConductionUploaded byEnesEmreTaş