© All Rights Reserved

20 views

© All Rights Reserved

- 2014-SPE 169394-Pore Pressure Analysis in Chicontepec Basin-Presidente Aleman Field
- Soil & Tillage Research 90 (2006) 117–125
- Res IP SM in Amethyst Valley
- Sailor Smrt Dst
- 22. Shaping Earths Surface
- cody lab report 5
- Surface Area and Porosity Pharmaceutical
- 9
- SCA2013-020
- Influence of powder.docx
- ARMA-09-040 Drillability of a Rock in Terms of Its Physico-Mechanical and Micro-Structural Properties
- 1-s2.0-S0167198799000860-main
- Structural Behaviour of Residual Soils of the Continually Wet Highlands of Papua New Guinea
- Afully Coupled Hydro-Thermo-poro-mechanical Model for Black Oil Reservoir Simulation
- A Rock Physics Model for Tight Gas Sand
- 48_1_New Orleans__03-03_0386
- Research paper
- Consoliation Nd Unconsolidation San Control
- NOE0415380416%2Ech093.pdf
- key-soil-1st_2

You are on page 1of 13

ORE GEO-TECHNICAL EFFECTS ON COPPER HEAP LEACH

KINETICS

Graeme Miller

Manager Process Engineering, Sinclair Knight Merz Australia

369 Ann Street, Brisbane Qld 4000 AUSTRALIA

AJ Parker CRC for Hydrometallurgy, Murdoch University,

Murdoch, Perth, Western Australia, 6150, AUSTRALIA

Division of Mining and Minerals Process Engineering,

University of Queensland, St Lucia, Brisbane, Queensland 4072, AUSTRALIA

Abstract

The geotechnical characteristics of the ore are important in understanding the kinetics of copper

heap leaching. These characteristics can indicate potential problems and can be used to

determine the semi-quantitative changes in field kinetics as compared with column kinetics.

The application of this approach allows a more rigorously based determination of scale up

factors than has been the case to date.

The shrinking core model has been shown to be a poor predictor of leach kinetics based solely

on the crushed ore size distribution. However the model itself is a very useful tool to analyse

commercial heap data.

Significant geotechnical parameters such as: bulk density / stress characteristic, limit moisture

capacity and particle density are used to determine the effect of changes on the diffusion

controlled leach rate. By consideration of the geotechnical reaction of the ore mass, the leach

rate changes are related to changes in these variables. Analysis of commercial heap data

indicates effective diffusion lengths of up to ten times the largest particle size.

Introduction

The application of heap leach technology to recovery of copper is wide spread in the world

industry. There are however a significant number of aspects of the technology that are not well

correlated. Most significant amongst these are the inter-relationship between the geo-technical

and geo-mechanical properties of the ore and their effect on the leach kinetics and economic

recovery of the valuable constituent.

There are other very significant aspects of the as placed ore that effect the leach kinetics. The

most significant of these are the size biasing due to the placement process and the creating of

preferred solution paths channels. This aspect has not been addressed in the present paper

although it is a very important parameter. It is the underlying material properties that are

evaluated and their impact assessed. The other significant parameter that will be included in

later papers is the impact of the irrigation hardware and application rate on the leach kinetics.

There are a number of standard tests that are undertaken by civil engineering and soil scientists

to characterise the physical and flow properties of rocks and soils. These tests have not been

generally included in heap leach testing programmes nor utilised in previous modelling of the

heap leach process. Some account of the fluid flow has been included [1,2] but the other

material properties eg moisture holding capacity, plasticity, bulk density / stress characteristic,

etc.) have not been addressed.

This paper is the result of work conducted on a number of operating heap leach sites around the

world and presents some preliminary findings on the effects of the ore rock mass characteristics

on the leach kinetics. In order to simplify the nomenclature the overall umbrella geo-

technical has been applied to the various areas of investigation that are covered, eg unsaturated

hydrology, soil mechanics, chemical diffusion, soil and crop science and environmental

engineering.

Leach Kinetics

The overall leach kinetics for commercial copper heap leaching are generally driven by a

diffusion process with the effective diffusion rate (D

eff

) being the rate controlling parameter.

The actual rate controlling step can be a number of parameters eg oxygen supply, acid supply,

copper removal from particles. The effective diffusion rate for an individual particle is

modified by the local physical parameters according to:

D

eff

= D

int

! / " (1)

and the diffusion controlled recovery is calculated from [1]:

Tr(R) = KD

eff

/r

0

2

(2)

D

eff

Effective diffusion coefficient

D

int

Intrinsic diffusion coefficient

K parameter including other conditions

! particle voidage

" void tortuosity

r

0

particle radius

Tr(R) Recovery transformed into the diffusion model space (Bartlett).

There are three significant variables in this relationship all of which are affected by the ore geo-

technical characteristics. The void fraction for a porous domain is a relationship controlled by

the interaction of the imposed stress and the compaction characteristics of the rocks in the

domain. This is an area of very considerable work and is a fundamental civil engineering

characteristic.

The tortuosity parameter is one that has generally been treated as a constant in most heap

leach models as it is not well understood [3,4,5]. This has been shown by the present work to

be a significant contributor to the observed leach rate.

In most leach models the particle size is treated as a constant from which an attempt is made to

predict the a priori leach rate [6, 7, 8, 9]. From the analysis of the commercial leach data it is

shown that the size parameter is also a variable. The magnitude of the leach size is

determined from a complex interaction of the geo-technical ore characteristics, placement bias,

mineralogy and irrigation parameters.

Tortuosity

Tortuosity is the least well understood of the parameters in the diffusion rate equation. It is

generally treated as a parameter of fixed magnitude in most models [1, 6, 7, 8, 9]. However

there is a very considerable body of work on diffusion in porous media that indicates that the

tortuosity is not only a characteristic of the material but also varies with the local total porosity.

As the porosity decreases, the tortuosity increases.

This aspect has not been included with the individual particle leach model approach, as the

particles are assumed inter alia to be incompressible. However, if the concept of a larger

leached particle domain is adopted, then this domain is now compressible and the value of the

tortuosity can vary as the domain is subject to changes in voidage. These changes in voidage

are the result of local stresses generally imposed from the placement method and the surcharge

of material over the domain of interest.

The definition of tortuosity is not one that is consistent across all disciplines. The definition

used in equation (1) is that generally used in the chemical engineering field and results in

typical tortuosities for porous medium made from near spherical particles of 1.5 to 6.0 [1, 10,

11, 12 and many others]. The other major significant definitions are from the soil science

discipline where tortuosity in solute diffusion is defined by [13, 14]:

D

eff

= " D

int

! (3)

Under these circumstances the tortuosity for typical soils takes up values of between 0.5 and

0.01 from mono-sized sand to dispersive clays [15].

From the above, it is evident that the tortuosity from chemical engineering is the reciprocal of

that used in soil science. Care is needed when using data from one discipline in the

relationships developed for another.

Hydrology also has a definition of tortuosity for fluid flow in pores under hydraulic pressure

[13]:

" = (l

e

/l)

2

(4)

l

e

total effective path length

l the characteristic geometric length measure.

This definition serves to confuse the other two when saturated flow in porous media is a

contributor to the recovery. However values of this tortuosity definition are not readily

available and have not been included in the present study.

Effects From Voidage

The interaction of tortuosity and voidage has been studied by a great many workers in a large

number of fields [16, 17, 18, 19, 20]. In general, there is agreement that the tortuosity increases

with decreasing voidage. The relationship between them, however, is not readily determined.

The data from Cussler [21] and Bartlett [5] in Figure 1.0 illustrates the range of tortuosity and

voidage values that have been obtained. This data covers the range of material types that are

likely to be encountered in heap leaching practice.

Figure 1: Data from Cussler and Bartlett on Changes of Tortuosity with Porosity.

Also shown on Figure 1 are a number of proposed relationships between " and

! [16, 17, 18, 20, 21]. As can be seen, the various relationships can be used to describe the

changes observed for individual data sets. However, to date there appears to be little work on

Porous Media Tortuosity

1.00

1.50

2.00

2.50

3.00

3.50

4.00

4.50

5.00

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1

Porosity

T

o

r

t

u

o

s

i

t

y

kaolin mica Wako &Smith soil 'crumbs' sand

Mackie &Meyers Suzuki &Smith rock pores Masamune &Smith Bruggeman

! =k +

"

(1-k)

! =

"

^0.5

! = (1+1/C)-

"

/C

C= 1/3

! = 1/

"

! = (2-

"

)/

"

the selection of the appropriate relationship based on considerations of the constituents of the

ore or soil under consideration.

There appears to be an increase in tortuosity dependence as the particles change from rigid

spheres (sand) to soil and various clay particles. This data set suggests that the tortuosity may

have a modest upper limit of 2.0 or 3.0.

The tortuosity of the rock pores reported by [7] is very much lower than any of the others. The

values are similar to crack and root tortuosity reported for clay soils of 1.4 [22].

Effects From Particle Shape

The particle shape effects can be seen to some extent in the literature eg with the use of

alternate parameters based on the ellipsoid aspect ratio [18]. Cussler [21] has provided a

theoretical basis for the calculation of the relationships between tortuosity and voidage for both

the spherical (mono sized, face centred cubic packing) and flakes of infinite length but with

variable aspect ratio (width/thickness).

The two relationships are:

For spherical particles: " = 1.5 + !(1-1.5) (5)

This is the same relationship as that developed by Suzuki and Smith [18] of: " = k + !(1-k)

where k is a shape factor parameter.

For flake shaped particles the relationship is [21]:

" = ! +#

2

(1$!)

2

(6)

Where # is the aspect ratio of the flake.

Aspect ratios for clay and mica minerals can be very high with 100 for clay and +300 for mica

being common values for commercial material. From this, it can be inferred that the tortuosity

values predicted by the Cussler model could be extremely high.

Totally dispersed clay systems are not common in the minerals industry, but are a common

feature of nano-composites engineering materials. The data from Swannack [23] has been

analysed using the Cussler model. Tortuosities up to 40 were evident in a fully disperse clay

particle system (particle # =100) shown in Figure 2.

Figure 2: Cussler 2D Flake Model applied to the data of Swannack.

Tortousity of Clay Nanocomposite (

!

=100)

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 0.85 0.9 0.95 1

Voidage

T

o

r

t

u

o

s

i

t

y

Swannack Cussler Model

Cussler Parameters

! = 12.744

r

2=0.9994

Tw interesting points are: the Cussler model can very accurately track the data, and the aspect

ratio needed for the 2D model is approximately the square root of the actual 3D based data.

The tortuosity value is very high when compared with other normal values used in previous

leaching models. Evidently materials containing significant proportions of flaky particles (ie

clay) can exhibit high tortuosity values.

The two Cussler models have been used to analyse the Curries data [12]. This provides a

greater degree of understanding of the drivers behind changes in tortuosity with changing

material parameters. Initially a two component model has been assumed; with a proportion of

near spherical particles and the remainder as flaky particles. In the absence of an alternative

proven methodology, a linear weighted average has been used.

"

tot

= Y

s

"

sphere

+ (1- Y

s

)"

flake

(7)

where Y

s

is the volume fraction of spherical particles. The results of the analysis are shown in

Figure 3.

Figure 3: Analysis of Currie [12] and Swannacks [21] data with a combination of

Cusslers models.

The sandy material is well modelled with the spherical model alone, using a k factor of 2.1.

This is not surprising as the sand was closely sized. The mica, with a very large aspect ratio, has

very similar characteristics to the data from Swannack in this restricted range. The # value is

high at 14.04 and reflects the increased aspect ratio that is shown by the mica mineral.

Kaolin shows a modest aspect ratio for the Cussler correlation of 4.26. This is significantly

less than that for the Swannack data. The kaolin however is not likely to be totally dispersed as

was the case for Swannack. The overall aspect ratio of the tested material is likely to be much

lower than for individual flakes due to the structured (plate stacked) way in which it is found

naturally, Carty [24]. He found from SEM analysis that the aspect ratio of fully dispersed

kaolin is approximately 10:1. Further work is required to characterise as found clays but an

effective aspect ratio, for partially dispersed clay, of around 4.0 is not unreasonable.

The soil crumb curve is a combination of the sand and kaolin curves with a back-calculated clay

content. There is no indication in Curries paper as to the actual proportion of clay in the soil.

However the calculated value of 11% clay, is reasonable for a soil that will produce crumbs

rather than sand or balls.

The benefit of this method of analysis is that there is now a simple method of calculating the

tortuosity from known data for sand, clay (kaolin) and their proportions. A change in the

fundamental characteristics of each is not likely and the method of combination is the only

untested area.

Porous Media Tortuosity

Unified Cussler Model on Data from Currie & Swannack

1.00

1.50

2.00

2.50

3.00

3.50

4.00

4.50

5.00

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1

Porosity

T

o

r

t

u

o

s

i

t

y

kaolin mica soil 'crumbs' sand Sandmodel Soil Model KaolinModel Micamodel Swannack

!

= 4.26 !

=14.04

k= 2.1

Ys = 0.89

!

= 4.26

k = 2.1

Voidage

The voidage of the leach pile is inherently a simple concept to encompass. The problem is to

apportion this into the various voids that occur. The total voidage (!

t

) is the total volume minus

the rock volume, and is directly related to the bulk density (%

b

) and particle density (%

p

)

through:

%

b

= %

p

(1-!

t

) (8)

The rock mass has a limited moisture holding capacity, which is the drained moisture content

(m

l

) after partial saturation by irrigation: !

l

!

l

= %

b

/%

w

(m

l

/(1-m

l

)) (9)

Within the moisture held by the rock mass is the saturated voidage within the particles

themselves: !

p

. This is part of the limit moisture capacity. Within the domains where the limit

moisture is held will be fully occluded gas voids [25] surrounded by capillary moisture: !

o

.

When the heap is being irrigated there is an additional moisture hold up which is due to the

advection flow [26] of the solution around the outside of the domains holding the limit

moisture: !

a

.

The free gas voidage is the remaining void space eg:

!

g

=!

t

!

l

!

o

!

a

(10)

Within these various voidages there are a number of relationships that are important for the

heap leach diffusion control rate.

The heap tortuosity is related to the nett heap void space (total voidage less particle voidage).

The void space for diffusion is the limit moisture voidage as this is the domain through which

the various solutes diffuse to the outer surrounding advection flow regime.

The total voidage is reduced with any increase in bulk density.

The limit moisture voidage is generally constant until the total voidage approaches the sum of !

l

+ !

o

. When the ore saturation nears 100% the held moisture is released until the internal pore

pressure is equilibrated with the external applied pressure. These pressures are not normally

found in the active leaching part of heap (but may be present in lower lifts that are subject to

higher static loads from overlying lifts).

The proportion of the total heap volume occupied by the limit moisture increases with

increasing dry bulk density.

A typical clayey ore type with a strong relationship between bulk density and stress is shown in

Figure 4. with the resultant change in total voidage shown in Figure 5.

Figure 4: Change in bulk density with Depth from the surface for a clayey ore.

Figure 5: Void fraction changes with heap depth below the surface.

For this ore type the bulk density quickly reaches an inflection point and thence increases only

slowly with further stress. The typical lift height of 6m indicates that the total voidage, even

near the top of the lift, is less than the limit moisture voidage. When the advection flow

voidage (2%) and the occluded voidage (3%) are taken into account it is seen that the available

total voidage is less than the required operation voidage at a depth of 1.0m from the surface.

Below this depth the total heap mass will be saturated with resultant problems of slow leaching

and geotechnical stability. It is no wonder that this material suffered significant problems with

low recovery rates even from low lift heights.

Bulk Density vs Height of Heap

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

0 1 2 3 4 5 6

Depth Below Surface - m

D

e

n

s

i

t

y

k

g

/

m

3

Point density Av Bulk Density

Void Fraction vs Heap Height

0.000

0.100

0.200

0.300

0.400

0.500

0.600

0 1 2 3 4 5 6

Depth Below Surface - m

V

o

i

d

a

g

e

Ave to depth At depth Limit moisture total operating

Including Advection and Occluded Voids

Particle Size

The term particle has a number of meanings when considering the heap leach process. For

the ore, it is the particle size distribution of the crushed material. This is a wide range generally

from 50mm to zero. Most heap leach operations now recognise the need to agglomerate the ore

to improve the percolation rate distribution and minimise channelling in the heap. The

agglomerated ore has a separate size distribution with a slight increase in the top size but a very

large increase in the bottom size. Typical sizes are 60mm to 2mm with all of the 2mm

adhering to the coarser fractions (and themselves) to form the agglomerates.

The concept of macro pores with advective flow and micro pores with no flow is used in soil

dispersion models to account for both convective and diffusive transfer [14, 25]. The model is

most useful in strongly structured soils which have large macro pores for advective flow. This

is equivalent to a heap leach situation where either agglomeration has been conducted or large

channels of coarse and fine material exist from the placement activity.

The real effect of this approach is to propose large volumes of the heap domain where advective

flow is not occurring, and the static water acts to define an effective in-situ particle. These

volumes are the result of the moisture holding capacity of the ore / soil. As a result, the total

moisture holding capacity is a measure of the total ore volume that is tied up in stagnant spaces

subject only to diffusion for ionic transfer. This is further increased by the inclusion of

occluded air pore spaces within the overall stagnant zone.

Within the heap are formed meta particles with very large size. In a heap with a very biased

size distribution after placement the meta particle size may approximate to the horizontal

distance between adjacent coarse channels. Other large meta particles are formed whenever a

perched water table is evident. The saturated area is the meta particle where diffusion of the

chemical species into and out of the saturated domain are the dominant rate determining steps.

Other large meta particles can be formed if the ore or agglomerates have any significant

plasticity. In other words, the particles are not rigid but are deformable. The plastic

agglomerates can coalesce / merge under the imposed load of the lift and create effective macro

particles. This coalescence needs only to be to the stage where the internal saturated pore

spaces are in hydraulic contact (effectively aqueous phase filled) to create the larger macro

particle. The heap depth below which these macro particles form will be effectively a few large

particles. Delineation of the outer extremities of the meta particle surfaces will only be

provided by any size-biased channels that may have been formed during placement.

As it is clear from the shrinking core model the change in particle size has an inverse squared

effect on the effective leach rate. Any small increase in effective particle size can have a

significant effect on the overall diffusion leach rate. One of the challenges in understanding

heap leaching is to determine the actual effective particle size (of the meta particle) being

leached.

Un-Saturated Flow and Channelling

The heap leach hydraulics are by definition unsaturated flow systems. Under these conditions a

number of authors [26, 27] have shown the application of leachant solution with either drippers

or wobblers produces fingering of the solution within the heap. The fingering is worse with

drippers [28] but is still evident with a uniform distribution over the heap surface. Typical

spaces between fingers are of the order of 50mm to 150mm [27]. This is a complicating factor

in the determination of a leached particle size and may be one of the main factors behind the

commercial experience where leaching is generally controlled by a single large particle size

and does not show an early high rate with smaller particles.

Some indication of these effects is provided by Chae and Wadsworth[7] who reported an

increase in effective leach particle size (R

eff

) with a decrease in the actual particle size (R) as

shown in Figure 6.

Figure 6: Proportional increase in leach particle size with decrease in actual particle size.

Data from Chae and Wadsworth.

In attempting to assess the effective particle size being leached there are two limits to that can

be identified:

At infinite separation (ie slurry leaching) the leach particle dimension is the actual crushed

particle size. This could be extended to some degree to assess the leaching of agglomerates in a

heap, as rigid spheres of the agglomerate size distribution.

At heap voidage equal to the limit moisture capacity (plus the occluded and advection voids)

the effective leached particle size is essentially infinite.

The resulting dependence of effective leached particle size on total heap void fraction is an

inverse exponential of the form:

R

eff

/R = 1+a/(!

t

!

l

!

o

!

a

)

b

(11)

Where a and b are constants that are related to the ore plasticity and clay content. The data

from Chae and Wadsworth for mono-sized granular materials, would suggest values of; a =

2.37 and b = 0.278 with larger values giving greater sensitivity. It is likely that values of both

and b will increase with wider size distributions and higher clay contents. In later modelling

,values of a = 1.0 and b = 0.25 have been used for illustration.

Effect of Clays

Inclusion of clays in a heap leach pile is determined mainly by their grade and the ease of

difficulty of removing them in the mine. In many cases it is not possible to remove the clayey

materials. Even a small proportion could have a significant effect on the resultant leach rate.

Clays have the effect of:

Providing higher tortuosity => slower leach rates

Higher limit moisture capacity => lower operating margin in heap bulk density

Lower overall total voidage => higher tortuosities and slower leach rates

Reff vs Size (Chao & Wadsworth)

y = 2.3669x

-0.2782

R

2

= 0.9859

1

1.5

2

2.5

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Particle Radius mm

R

e

f

f

/

R

Reff Power (Reff)

Provide higher plasticity and a more deformable ore mass => larger effective sizes, higher bulk

density with stress

All of these effects are additive and can severely impact the leach rate with only modest

increases in clay content. In general, these effects are all relatively easy to recognise and

appreciate their interactions. However it is entirely a different question to try to predict the

effect of increased clay content on the various leach rate parameters. This has been recognised

by Addiscott and Bailey[25] by requiring soil parameters to be field determined for inclusion in

their model.

Combined Parameter Effects

By using the relationships already discussed, some sensitivity modelling has been done to

indicate the magnitude of the leach rate decrease with changes to the main parameter of bulk

density. These are illustrated in Figure 7.

Figure 7: Calculation of leach parameters with change in bulk density.

The direct effect of the clay content is to reduce the leach rate for a given bulk density. The

most significant effect is the change in bulk density itself and the effect on both tortuosity and

relative particle size. The greatest changes in bulk density are between column tests and field

reality. A typical range would be from 1.5 in a column test and 1.7 in the field. The leach rate

for the field would be only 62% of the leach rate tested in the column.

The relative change in the bulk density stress relationship with increasing clay content also

needs to be tested. This is the main driver behind major changes in the leach rate of a given lift

height with changing clay content. As the bulk density sensitivity increases with increasing

clay content, the overall leach rate of a given lift will decrease substantially.

Commercial Leaching - Effective Particle Size

A large number of commercial heap leach data sets are in the process of analysis. The

preliminary results from a few are provided in Table I to illustrate the range of leach conditions

and the interactive effects of clay content, agglomeration and particle size on the observed leach

rates.

Bulk Density Effect on Diffusion Components:- 15% Clay

0.00

0.50

1.00

1.50

2.00

2.50

3.00

3.50

1.3 1.35 1.4 1.45 1.5 1.55 1.6 1.65 1.7 1.75 1.8

Bulk Density

V

a

r

i

o

u

s

porosity (e)% Tortuosity moist porosity De/De@1.30 R/Ro

Table I Commercial Heap Leach Data Calculation of Effective Size

Project A B B C D E E F

Crush Size mm 25 ROM 50 8 ROM 25 25 25

Ore type v clayey siliceous clayey clayey siliceous clayey clayey clayey

Mineralogy Surface Cc Surface Cc Surface Cc Disperse

Cc

Disperse

Cc

ESP dust ESP dust oxide

Limit moisture w/w

%

0.2 0.08 0.15 0.175 0.078 0.12 0.12 0.14

Limit moisture v/v % 0.310 0.149 0.257 0.343 0.136 0.208 0.195 0.211

Agglomeration polymer NIL YES YES NIL YES YES YES

bulk density - t/m3 1.3 1.8 1.6 1.7 1.69 1.6 1.5 1.4

irrigation rate -

L/h/m2

6.8 6 6 7.8 6.8 6 6 8

stack height- m 3.2 8 6 8 4.48 5 5 8

[acid] g/L 4.9 10 15 7.75 8.3 6 6 7

Effective Diffusion

path length mm

63 85 258 162 382 129 150 92

In all the commercial leaching data analysed to date, for each leach cell there is a single

underlying leach rate that varies only with applied lixivant concentration and does not show

appreciable fall off with time. This indicates that there is:

No appreciable consolidation effects on either operating voidage or effective leach size.

No change in effective leach size throughout the leach period.

These imply that neither the actual crushed size distribution, nor the agglomerate size

distribution is the rate controlling mechanism. The rate controlling mechanism is the

combination of mineralogy (dispersed or fracture surface controlled), tortuosity, limit moisture

capacity, irrigation instability and fingering, ore plasticity and related effects setting a large

effective particle size.

Prediction of Leach Rate

Hydrology models can not predict with certainty the flow pattern (fingering and unsaturated

hydraulic flow proportions) and therefore can not predict leach rate with any certainty due to

the unknown effect on effective finger spacing. Similarly the limit moisture holding capacity

can not be predicted with accuracy a priori from sizing or soil texture information. The effective

in situ particle size prediction, from the combined effects of clay proportion, compaction,

consolidation and tortuosity arguments, is unlikely to be achieved without testing of the

material. Similarly the relationship between bulk density and imposed stress can not be

predicted with any certainty from other characteristics.

Under these circumstance, it is considered extremely unlikely that a mechanistic model can be

developed for heap leaching. There will always be a requirement for testing of the material

properties and the ranges of those properties likely to be found during the operating life of the

project. By understanding the interactions of the material properties and the leach rate, it

should be possible to project a new leach rate from an existing known leach rate under varying

circumstance. The most important test parameters are discussed in this paper and will be

utilised in further work.

Conclusions

The understanding of the heap leach kinetics can be advanced by the analysis of the

geotechnical characteristics of the leached ore. The bulk density and its sensitivity to heap

height are important global indicators of the relative leach rate to be expected from previous

data. The detailed parameters: tortuosity, voidage and limit moisture capacity can be estimated

from changes in the bulk density and clay content of the ore.

The effective leached particle size is significantly larger than either the crushed or

agglomerated size. The large meta particles are the result of immobile moisture in deformable

materials, in un-saturated flow with fingering of the leach solution.

It is considered unlikely that a mechanistic model can be developed to account for all these

parameters; and that only relative changes can be predicted from known leach data.

Acknowledgments

The author would like to thank the AJ Parker CRC for Hydrometallurgy for financial support in

obtaining the leach data. Also due thanks are the operating companies who have provided

access to their data and personnel.

References

1. R. W. Bartlett , Solution Mining (Gordon and Breach, Pa, 1992), 79-117.

2. W. J. Schlitt ed, Surface and Hybrid Mining: Aqueous Extraction Methods Section 15.2

Solution Mining: Surface Techniques, 1453-1492.

3. P. L. Brown, ANSTO, Private Communication with Author, 2002.

4. J. C. Box and A. P. Prosser, A General Model for the Reaction of Several Minerals and

Several Reagents in Heap and Dump Leaching, Hydrometallurgy, 16: 1986, 77-92.

5. R. W. Bartlett, Metal Extraction from Ores by Heap Leaching, Metallurgical and

Minerals Transactions B, Vol 28B, 1997, 529-545.

6. D. G. Dixon and J. L. Hendrix, A General Model for Heap Leaching of One or More Solid

Reactants from Porous Ore Pellets, Metallurgical Transactions B, Vol 24B, 1993, 157-

169

7. D. G. Chae and M. E. Wadsworth, The Leaching of Dilute Copper Oxide Ore Phases (1),

In Situ Recovery of Minerals, 1974, 2 21.

8. R. J. Roman, B. R. Benner and G. W. Becker, Diffusion Model for Heap Leaching and its

Application to Scale-Up, SME Transactions-Vol 256, 1974, 247-252.

9. L. M. Cathles and L. E. Murr, Evaluation of an Experiment Involving Large Column

Leaching of Low Grade Copper Sulfide Waste: A Critical Test of a Model of the Waste

Leaching Process, Chapter 3, 29-48.

10. J. H. Perry, ed., Chemical Engineers Handbook, 4

th

edition, pp 14-21 to 14-26

11. J. H. Perry, D. W. Green and J. O. Maloney, eds., Chemical Engineers Handbook, 7

th

edition, 5-50 to 5-55 and 6-18,19.

12. J. A. Currie, Gaseous Diffusion in Porous Media. Part 2 Dry Granular Materials, Br Jnl

App Phy, Vol 11 (1960), 318-324.

13. T. J. Marshall and J. W. Holms, Soil Physics, 2

nd

edition, (Camb Univ Press, 1988)

14. J. Bouma, Influence of Soil Macroporosity in Environmental Quality, Adv Agron, Vol 46

(1991), 1-37.

15. D. C. Ford and P. W. Williams, Karst Geomorphology and Hydrology, (Unwin Hyman,

London, 1989), 601-645.

16. J. S. Mackie and P. Meares, The Diffusion of Electrolytes in a Cation-Exchange Resin

Membrane, Proc Royal Soc, Vol 232 (1955), 498-509.

17. N. Wakao and J. M. Smith, Diffusion in Catalyst Pellets, Chem Eng Sci, Vol 17 (1962),

825-834.

18. M. Suzuki and J. M. Smith, Axial Dispersion in Beds of Small Particles, Chem Eng Jrnl,

Vol 3 (1971), 256-264.

19. J. M. Smith, Chemical Engineering Kinetics, (McGraw Hill,1972), 413-419.

20. S. Masamune and J. M. Smith, Pore Diffusion in Silver Catalysts, AIChE Journal, Vol 8,

No 2 (1961), 217-221.

21. E. L. Cussler, ed., Diffusion: Mass Transfer in fluid Systems, 2

nd

edition, (Cambridge

University Press, 1997), 142-183.

22. V. Y. Chertkov and I. Ravina, Tortuosity of Crack Networks in Swelling Clay Soils,

Journal of Soil Science Society of America, Vol 63 (1999), 1523-1530.

23. C. Swannack, C. Cox, D. Hirt and A. Liakos, Nanocomposite Modelling and Simulation,

ANTEC 2002.

24. W. M. Carty, Rheology of Aqueous Clay Suspensions, Oil Sands Extraction

Fundamentals and Process Water Workshop, May 2001.

25. T. M. Addiscott and N. J. Bailey,Relating the Parameters of a Leaching Model to the

Percentage of Clay and other Soil Components, Field Scale Water and Solute Fluxes in

Soils, ed K Roth, (Monte Verta, Birhauser Verlag, Basel, 1990), 209-221.

26. M. OKane, S. L. Barbour and M. D. Haug, A Framework for Improving the Ability to

Understand and Predict the Performance of Heap Leach Piles, Copper99-Cobre99, Vol IV,

Young etal (eds.), (The Minerals, Metals and Materials Society), 409-419

27. S. Orr and V. Vesselinov, Enhanced Heap Leaching Part 2 Applications, Mining

Engineering, Oct 2002, 33-38.

28. D. Dixon, Private Communication with Author, 2002.

- 2014-SPE 169394-Pore Pressure Analysis in Chicontepec Basin-Presidente Aleman FieldUploaded byPerla Zumaya
- Soil & Tillage Research 90 (2006) 117–125Uploaded bygaviria77
- Res IP SM in Amethyst ValleyUploaded bySlamet Subiono
- Sailor Smrt DstUploaded byShreshtha Verma
- 22. Shaping Earths SurfaceUploaded byscottsum
- cody lab report 5Uploaded byapi-273740475
- Surface Area and Porosity PharmaceuticalUploaded byvandelfin
- 9Uploaded byBahadır Harmancı
- SCA2013-020Uploaded byRosa K Chang H
- Influence of powder.docxUploaded byRiskha Febriani Hapsari
- ARMA-09-040 Drillability of a Rock in Terms of Its Physico-Mechanical and Micro-Structural PropertiesUploaded bydrilling moneytree
- 1-s2.0-S0167198799000860-mainUploaded byRenato Epifanio
- Structural Behaviour of Residual Soils of the Continually Wet Highlands of Papua New GuineaUploaded byعصام السامرائي
- Afully Coupled Hydro-Thermo-poro-mechanical Model for Black Oil Reservoir SimulationUploaded byIlan Gargon
- A Rock Physics Model for Tight Gas SandUploaded bymhdstat
- 48_1_New Orleans__03-03_0386Uploaded byBorneo Satria Pratama
- Research paperUploaded bySaulat Jillani
- Consoliation Nd Unconsolidation San ControlUploaded byJahanzeb Channa
- NOE0415380416%2Ech093.pdfUploaded byUmed Abd-alsatar
- key-soil-1st_2Uploaded byOmar H Darabseh
- 2016_Nov_21_CEX6230_2015-16(2)Uploaded byNero Perera
- 2012_Yan_SEG_New_model_pore_pressure.pdfUploaded byGhufron Malik Aryudantara
- pg 64Uploaded byHari Ram
- PorosityUploaded byPawan Kumar
- Spatial Variability of Hydraulic ConductivityUploaded byMatias Theodoridis
- Compressibility_17Uploaded byFritzie Vega
- Bioceramics Synthetic OptionsUploaded byDwi Yerlis Rahmi
- KavliA0editUploaded byMeilani Kusumawati
- CHAPTER-2.1Uploaded bymidju dugassa
- Experimental DarcyUploaded byJorge Páez Arango

- BlendingUploaded bysatya7960
- Black Plastic Pipes Solar Heating SystemsUploaded byUser20141
- 9-berryUploaded byJohn Cabrera
- 588Uploaded byUser20141
- mining introductionUploaded bypriyanka
- Australia Copper by Ore Type MapUploaded byUser20141
- Mine Development - access to deposit.pdfUploaded byMax Tapia Castillo
- Discussion on Production RateUploaded byUser20141
- Australian Operating Mines Map by AgesUploaded byUser20141
- copper NZ report.pdfUploaded byUser20141
- Copper MineralogyUploaded byUser20141
- Yan 1994Uploaded byjsotofmet4918
- 010Uploaded byJosé Carlos Bustamante Morales
- Basics of Monte Carlo SimulationUploaded byPriyanshu Bhattacharya
- TC RCUploaded byUser20141
- Teaching Mineralogy AustraliaUploaded byUser20141
- QEMSCAN and diagnostic leaching in the characterisation of visible gold in complex ores.pdfUploaded byUser20141
- The Business Value of Best Practice Process MineralogyUploaded byUser20141
- Mineralogical Studies Carlin NevadaUploaded byUser20141
- Process Development Metallurgical StudiesUploaded byUser20141
- Process MineralogyUploaded byUser20141
- Mineralogy CadiaUploaded byUser20141
- Major Au Ore TypesUploaded byUser20141
- Escondida 2012Uploaded byRoberto Salas
- Tonnage-Grade Data GoldUploaded byUser20141
- Tarkwa Cut Over Cut OffUploaded byUser20141
- Tracking Trends in Mining (ICSG, Deloitte, Lisbon, 2016)Uploaded byUser20141
- Copper Alliance 20120425 ICSG NotesUploaded byUser20141
- ATAEI_Determination of Optimum Cutoff Grades of Multiple Metal DepositsUploaded byAnonymous PsEz5kGVae

- EZ Stop LanyardUploaded byJohn Jairo Camacho
- Anaerobic Azo Dye ReductionUploaded byrajdewaan
- Sound Level Calculator-distanceUploaded byMesiah Maphakela
- Project PrintUploaded byChiranjeevi Chanakya
- Excel Sheet for Gravity RWall DesignUploaded bySunita Chaurasia
- Generation of Electric Power- Part B.docUploaded byidealparrot
- Biochemistry Lab NotesUploaded byEpp
- B ING DebatUploaded byAlief Maulana
- November ReportUploaded byArvindKumar
- 14759-T1, Vol 2, 14, Pages 122 - 236, 4.41 MB(material balance)Uploaded byAnum Ahmed
- Acceptable External Nozzle Loads Calculation for Pressure VesseUploaded byt_rajith1179
- chmistry hissanUploaded byVaskar Humagain
- Isolite MSDS - 1400 SeriesUploaded byMashudi Fikri
- rankine 1.pdfUploaded byBryan Dominic Gabriel Padua
- Carbon Nanotube Reinforced Cement Composites Preparation, Characterization and TestingUploaded byeminemcyz
- w13-0239-02Uploaded bysureshthevan
- Saravanan Wpq-5g 50nbUploaded byDeepak
- Lf Rd Retaining WallUploaded bysadik268
- Blackbody Radiation and the StefanUploaded bysalmati123
- Physiology of Aqueous HumorUploaded byCindy Seow Sieng Teng
- Beale 189x the New Materialism - Dictatorial Scientific Utterances and the Decline of ThoughtUploaded byDarius Baciu
- D1330.17885-1 - Vol. 09.02Uploaded byJignesh Trivedi
- DAY-1Uploaded byCHARLES
- Shackman Psyc210 Module12 NatureNurture Part3Uploaded byShackmanlab
- Jurnal Reading - GeriatriUploaded byL-Len
- Prime 4 Pd MeterUploaded bytiualbert8729
- F1077-95a-R02Uploaded bywhoknowshimself
- 0706.1355Uploaded byCourtney Caulkins
- Unit 1-Molecules AnswersUploaded byareyouthere92
- 1st Sem Syllabus Revised wbscteUploaded byABCuploader

## Much more than documents.

Discover everything Scribd has to offer, including books and audiobooks from major publishers.

Cancel anytime.