Softwood deal pours $450 million straight into White House, says U.S. lawyer: Bush Slush Fund Money Laundering Results
<http://thetyee.ca/>Bush 'Slush Fund,' Courtesy of Canada Turning trade deal into Republican ammo? Softwood deal pours $450 million straight into White House, says U.S. lawyer. By Elliot J. Feldman <http://thetyee.ca/ Bios/Elliot_J__Feldman> TheTyee.ca [Editor's note: On August 21 in Ottawa, the Standing Committee on International Trade heard a U.S. trade lawyer damn the proposed softwood lumber agreement as a terrible deal for Canadians. Elliot J. Feldman <http://www.bakerlaw.com/ F i n d L a w y e r s . a s p x ? Abs_Ppl_ID=c8368b77-88f4-4e5e-affc4749db007c08> of Baker & Hostetler LLP argued that Canada caved at a moment of strength, given that international rulings continued to land firmly on our side. Instead, Feldman argued, this deal will kill the NAFTA process which has favoured Canada's position, and forfeit at least a billion dollars plus hundreds of millions of dollars more in interest that would have come our way had our negotiators hung tough./ /Feldman, who is based in Washington, D.C., offered one more bit of startling analysis, excerpted below. The deal, he said, will funnel nearly half a billion dollars directly to George Bush's White House, creating a political "slush fund" available to the Republicans and the U.S. timber industry for waging future campaigns.]/ Honorable members, responsibility for this deal ultimately resides with the government and with you, not the industry. It has been forced on the industry for political reasons. No one in the industry likes it, but many believe they have no choice and, therefore, many have already accepted it. I want to talk for a few minutes about the genesis of this agreement and one of its most important and least discussed elements. There is a bit of Watergate in this story and, as in Watergate, it is essential to follow the money. Back before Christmas, David Emerson, then minister in a Liberal government, and his ambassador in Washington, Frank McKenna, were asking what it would cost to buy peace in softwood lumber. They were adhering to all of the usual Canadian negotiating positions on this subject: protecting Chapter 19 in NAFTA, fending off onerous anticircumvention clauses, protecting Canadian prerogatives. But, unlike any previous dispute, this one involved the accumulation of over 4 billion, now 5 billion, dollars. And there was the Byrd Amendment, which led the U.S. industry to believe that if it could just stall long enough to wear down the Canadians, while claiming title to all of the money, they could settle for a lot of it. They knew the Canadians had brought a case in U.S. courts that could prohibit them from claiming any of the money pursuant to the Byrd Amendment. They demanded a 60/40 split back at Christmas. Messieurs Emerson and McKenna negotiated to 50/50 and then asked industry. Industry calculated net present value against litigation prospects, and said "no." But, in the process, Messieurs McKenna and Emerson asked what would be enough. At that time, under those circumstances, they were told 70%. Think, then of how impressed Mr. Emerson was with himself when in April, he could tell industry that he got 80%. But, there were at least four huge problems, and he had neglected all of them. *'Legally entitled to not a penny'* First, on April 7, the United States Court of International Trade ruled that the U.S. industry was entitled legally to no money. None of it. It was not surprising then, that 20 days later, the U.S. coalition said that it would take $500 million. It was hardly a negotiating triumph to persuade them to take $500 million, when they had become legally entitled to not a penny. Win a pass to Bridging Borders Toward Food Security <http://thetyee.ca/adserver/ a d c l i c k . p h p ? b a n nerid=164&zoneid=16&source=&dest=htt p%3A%2F%2Fthetyee.ca%2FContests% 2 F 2 0 0 6 % 2 F 0 9 % 2 F 0 1 % 2FFoodSecurityContest%2F> Second, net present value at the end of April was not the same as it was at Christmas, especially as the pot kept growing. Canadian industry had in mind a fixed sum for the coalition, maybe as much as $150 million, not half a billion. Third, it was not quite as obvious in the two and a half page term sheet of April 27, that Canada would give away everything that the previous government had been defending in order to complete a deal, because political priorities had changed so radically. And fourth, the term sheet promised a major joint initiative to improve North American competitiveness. The "remainder" -- that was the word the terms said -- would go to so-called "meritorious initiatives" in the United States. Industry was troubled by this last development. It wondered why it was providing foreign aid to the United States, but it was also reassured that the sum would be small. More impressively, Minister Emerson told CEOs that, as long as they were getting back 80 per cent of their money, it was none of their business what would happen to the rest. He was, by all accounts, very blunt on this subject. And, meanwhile, we were advised by negotiators that the White House had taken a direct and active interest in this money, but that Canadian industry ought to focus on other things. As the minister had said, it was not really their concern. The "remainder," then, became $450 out of $500 million dollars. *'Gift of $450 million to the president'* That, honorable members, is a colossal sum of money. It certainly got the U.S. government, as well as the coalition getting the other $500 million, committed to the deal. It is astonishing how little, nothing really, the Canadian Government got in exchange for it. And let's understand this money -- the $500 million -- not the coalition's money, about which you heard some on July 31, but the rest. Some perspective. At the height of the Watergate scandal, focus was on an illegal slush fund available to the Committee to Re-Elect the President, that was thought to be tipping the balance of American politics. The fund never exceeded $20 million. One stand it, under the control of the White House; Congress would have no say and Canada would have no say as to the use of that money. And, hence, in a

Why Do Tory Prime Ministers Sell Out? Harper Puts Canada On Auction Block
Masse speaks out on suggested changes to weaken the Canada Investment Act Windsor – NDP MP Brian Masse is calling on Industry Minister Maxime Bernier to immediately and publicly reject Department of Industry internal advice to allow increased foreign ownership in Canada. Masse says if Bernier accepts the advice of his officials he will be placing Canadian sovereignty on the auction block. “If the Minister of Industry guts the Investment Canada Act like his department is telling him to, he will expose Canada to inevitable job losses, and with increased takeovers of sensitive industries like telecommunications, increased security and privacy concerns as well,” said Masse. “You can’t simply put our multi-billion dollar mineral mining industry up for sale. These proposed changes to the Investment Act would do just that.” Masse reissued his call to have the Investment Act overhauled by the House of Commons Industry Committee. He is demanding a full and comprehensive review of the Investment Canada Act and a strengthening of the powers of the Investment Canada agency to halt foreign takeovers of critical Canadian resources and infrastructure. “When the Chinese state that owned MinMetals was in negotiations to purchase Canada’s largest zinc and copper producer, Noranda, the NDP raised the concern that non-democratic state governments can purchase Canadian companies with no accountability, and in secrecy,” said Masse. “The Liberals, Bloc and Conservatives ignored the issue.” At the time of the proposed takeover, Masse tabled a motion in the Industry Committee to aggressively review the act – his motion was denied by the Conservative, Liberal and Bloc members of the committee.

Toronto Street News — Vol. 8, #7, Sept. 15-28, 2006

Page 9

of the articles of impeachment against Richard Nixon was that he received foreign campaign donations, perhaps as much as $50,000. Both by statute and by the U.S. Constitution, gifts of money to the U.S. must go to the treasury and be appropriated by Congress. The lone, aberrant and still controversial exception has been money donated in the immediate aftermath of the emergency created by Hurricane Katrina, and the sums involved were very small. So, here we have the government of Canada requiring that Canadian private parties sign over $450 million to an escrow fund slated to be conveyed to the White House. The agreement does not mention Congress, and the Bush administration says that Congress will not be involved in any way with this agreement. The government of Canada thus is making a gift of $450 million to be spent by the president. That was more than a belt buckle, even more than a stetson, on July 6th. There is only one date certain in the deal: that the planned expenditure of the $450 million must be determined by September 1. *Political blowback?* Curious, that date, which traditionally is the kick-off for campaigns in the United States in election years. Yes, it's an election year, and the Republican control of Congress is considered in trouble. The entire Republican campaign war chest is less than $300 million. Canada will add to it by 150 per cent in funds to be expended for "meritorious initiatives." It does not require much imagination to foresee the strategic places where this money will be spent. This peace on softwood lumber will probably not improve Canada's relations with the United States, because this colossal sum of money is going to the White House, not the U.S. Treasury. When the Democratic party learns of it and understands it, it's not likely to be pleased, and it's possible that, despite the infusion of such money, the Democrats nevertheless will win in November. Canada may then have much improved relations with the Republican party but not with the United States. /During questions following Feldman's presentation, NDP MP Peter Julian <http:// www.parl.gc.ca/information/about/people/ k e y / b i o . a s p ? Language=E&query=18594&s=MTK> (New Westminster/Burnaby) noted the "quite a staggering revelation that the funding of $450 million would be, if I under-

mid-term election year we would be giving $450 million to a massive political fund." Feldman responded:/ This is in my view an historic, unprecedented, astounding intrusion into American politics. We searched all the way back to the Revolution and found nothing like it in American history. And the question that I came this morning to put is, "Will the Parliament of Canada accept responsibility for possibly tipping the balance in American politics in preserving the control of Congress by the president's party?" This softwood lumber agreement is an historic moment in part because of that proposition, and it's up to this Parliament to decide whether it will accept the responsibility. That responsibility cannot be shifted and, indeed, that money inevitably will go to shore up the electoral aspirations of the Republican party through the president -- it's not going to be touched by Congress -- it's going through an escrow fund. And these are questions that could impact American politics for generations and impact relations between Canada and the United States for generations to come. And that is entirely in the hands of this Parliament. /Mr. Julian:/ So what you're saying is that we are not only providing money to the coalition to fight further legal victories, for further legal battles -- giving half a billion dollars to them -- but we're also providing money that may go to political purposes for the re-election of Republicans, many of whom have been the most adamant against allowing free trade in lumber. It is ridiculous. /Mr. Feldman:/ The provision in Article 13.A.2 of the agreement, which recites the meritorious initiatives, is language which could be defined only as a slush fund for the president. /Elliot J. Feldman <http://www.bakerlaw. com/Fin dLawyer s.aspx? Abs_Ppl_ID=c8368b77-88f4-4e5e-affc4749db007c08> is a partner of the law firm Baker Hostetler and represents clients in Europe, Asia, Latin America and Australia. He is the former director of the University Consortium for Research on North America at Harvard University and is a director of the Canadian-American Business Council./

Since 1985 when the Act came into effect, 87% of takeover acquisitions have been automatically approved. In almost 20 years, with almost 11,000 cases, not once has a foreign acquisition been denied. Masse points to this failure as proof that the House of Commons must take action. “Clearly, the Minister and his department are on the wrong track,” said Masse. “They seem to think increasing foreign investment in Canada is the way to a bolster our economy. What they fail to realize is that as we sell off our resource industries piece by piece, our sovereignty as a nation is also being sold. When you no longer control your resources, you no longer control your sovereignty.”

How Much Did U.S. Agents Promise To Pay Harper For Treason?
Readers know we’ve been following Canadian politics for years. So, it’s not without real fear for our Canadian future that we print a strong headline for this little article. We’ve watched Harper’s moves over the past months and we have yet to see a prime minister who bothers to come to Toronto for a friendly visit. We’ve watched Harper visit foreign countries such as Mexico and the United States to strengthen ties or weaken Canada to do it. Alliances with these two countries with the end goal of taking down our borders with them is something that will destroy our fine Canadian standards as they are headed for with our new immigrant blood giving us a vigorous new life. The danger is that the elites that run the country pull the rug out from under everybody by weakening a sense of Canadian identity. If that happens, we will be lowered to the foreign standards of the United States and Mexico. For just one issue — drug usage — these two countries are leaders in consumption of drugs — whereas foreign corporations such as Japan and Korea’s car manufacturers know it is safe to build car plants in Canada as opposed to the United States and Mexico. One thing we have in comparison to these countries is a superior work ethic — believe it — in comparison to them — and we have a better standard when it comes to surviving mentally and emotionally without the use of drugs to get through the day. That is our future— not one in which we sell out to global criminals like George Bush — his economists witness the fact that all the big bucks have left that country for foreign investment as there is no hope for the U.S. Yet, Harper, an actual lap-dog of the United States has obviously fallen for their corrupt line — there is nothing in the United States which we do not have in equal or better form here in Canada. Our diverse, quiet country will lose out in respect by the rest of the world if we fold to the lying, corrupt Bush crime family whose family was charged in wartime with financing Adolf Hitler. The Israeli government has nothing but contempt for the Bushes so it manipulates that government mercilessly for billions in cash, arms deliveries and military secrets which it can sell to China for north Koreans to use as well. Cynically, Harper saw fit to waste an opportunity to speak to the United States and Canada by not speaking English when he had that forum. Instead, he spoke in FrenchCanadian in order to follow his plan to break up Canada for the western advantage to become a U.S. oil state. He gave away Canada’s global voice to the province of Quebec — an illegal act — when Canada speaks at UNESCO. He is training the world to believe Quebec and Canada are on equal footing and should give Quebec a separate vote at the United Nations in order to break up Canada. His Reform Party roots show him as starting up to fight separatist Quebecers while hid-

Harper: Easily The Most Dangerous Man In Canada
ing the fact from the rest of the country they had the same ambitions for the west to separate. They wanted to stop giving money to Quebec under Canada’s balance of payments system whereby have provinces gave to those in need of supplements. Alberta has a lower universal standard of government; health care costs are much higher and no sales tax means no government services. Mounties are murdered at country homes where women are abused more so than in the rest of the country. The aim therefore is to drop the rest of Canada, reward the rich, exploit hard-working Newfies who are asked to travel there after being accused of being welfare bums. As a U.S. state, Harper and Alberta will be able to live happily ever after on their oil sands riches. We know the Reform Party was long ago infiltrated by the CIA, the Mormons (one Reformer reportedly in love with the idea of polygamy) .under the guidance of Preston Manning who travelled to Vietnam on his honeymoon to evaluate the effectiveness of the U.S. assassination project known as the Phoenix Program. Later, he worked with U.S. corporations such as the infamous Rand Corporation which planned atomic warfare for Vietnam and the TRW corporation which helped Preston plan non-military peacetime versions of the Phoenix program. Watch Mr. Harper very closely. Canada has everything to lose and nothing to gain by buddy-buddy with Bush. On the weekend we spoke with a Harper cabinet minister who evoked political alarm over the Afghanistan fact. Why do our politicians see no harm in the fact that opium production has increased hugely under Canadian soldiers’ protection and British tanks (see elsewhere in this issue) protecting opium crops. Victor Fletcher The U.S. cannot exist without 90% of its Editor vpflet@hotmail.com heroin being supplied by the Afghan effort. It’s time we started doing citizen arrests of generals who won’t reply about the heroin problem. How many more homeless in Toronto will be kicked to death in their sleeping bags by soldiers in training?
416 288-0117 Fax 416 288-0117


Buying Or Selling A Home In Your Toronto Neighbourhood?
Linda M. Bawn Sales Representative Morneau Sobeco Centre II 895 Don Mills Rd., Suite 202 Toronto, ON M3C 1W3

Commissions Are Negotiable: Call Linda Bawn

Office: 416 391-3232 Ext. 4 Direct Line: 416 704-2119 Fax 416 391-0319 linda@lindabawn.com www.lindabawn.com

Right At Home Realty Inc.

Member of Toronto Real Estate Board


— Toronto — Between Kingston Rd. & Woodbine Ave. Party Supplies ● Stationeries ● Hardware ● Kitchenware Bathroom items ● Cleaning items Kraft ● Gift items Food & Candies ● Famous Perfumes Lotions ● Make up items ● Hair Accessories ● Toys (More than 100 to choose from) Electronics items and more

1735 Queen St. East

For more details: 416 691-6383

CentrespreadSept28 page 1

Thursday, September 14, 2006 21:01 Composite