You are on page 1of 20

)

Denton Ra )Resources
Air Monitoring Results Denton City/Range Resources
Estimate of ESLExceedences
December and February Test Comparisons
)
Pollutant CAS MW Results Results Results Results TCEQ Exceeds TCEQ Exceeds TCEQ
ppbv ppbv ppbv ppbv Sht Term TCEQ Lg Term TCEQ Short Term
Grab 24hr ESL (ppb) Sh Term ESL(ppb) Lg Term ESL Basis
Dec 13 09 5-Feb 18-Feb 18-Feb
TO-14
Benzene 71432 78.0 4.81 0.00 :l!6.~0
S.S.4Cl 54.0 Yes
1.4
'Wes Health
Chlorometha ne 74873
50.4 0.56 0.65 0.00 0.00 500.0 No 50.0 No Health
Dichlorodifluoromethane (F12) 75718 120.9 0.48 0.49 30.60 0.48 10000.0 No 1000.0 No Health
Dichlorotetrafluoroethane (F114) 76142 170.9 0.00 0.00 39.00 0.68 10000.0 1000.0 Health
Ethyl benzene 100411 92.0 1.00 0.00 0.00 3.18 460.0 No 46.0 No Odor
Styrene 100425 104.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 25.0 33.0 Odor
Toluene 108883 92.0 7.93 0.00 27.00 0.00 170.0 No 330.0 No Odor
1,3,S-Trimethylbenzene/4-Ethyltoluene 108678 120.2 2.48 0.00 0.00 1.26 250.0 No 25.0 No Health
1,2,4 Trimethylbenzene 95636 120.2 0.95 0.00 0.00 0.00 5000.0 No 500.0 No Health
m&p Xylenes 1330207 106.0 5.30 0.00 0.00 11.40 80.0 No 42.0 No Odor
o-Xylene 95476 106.0 2.28 0.00 0.00 1.73 380.0 No 42.0 No Odor
TIC
Cyclohexadiene 628411 80 23.4 2030 No No Odor
Isobutane 75285 58 11.90 6.74 2040 No 204 No Odor
Camphene 79925 136 2.85 No No
Carbon Disulfide** 75150 76 1!A,.,QQ ]$;AMD 10 'f~ 1 !'«ej;.• Health
Dimethyl Disulfide 624920 94 ~~(!) 5 ¥ea
0.5
¥~$. Health
Dimethyl Trisulfide 3658808 126 l.:t~ 5¥e.s, 0.5
¥es
Propynyl Benzene 116 7.20
Methyl Ethyl Disulfide 2E+07 108 ]~~(!) 5 ¥§ 0.5 ~El§,
Diethyl Trisulfide 3600246 154 6.20 16 No 1.6 ¥fS-S
)
)
Denton Ra )Resources
Air Monitoring Results Denton City/Range Resources
Pollutant CAS MW Results Results Results Results TCEQ Exceeds TCEQ Exceeds TCEQ
ppbv ppbv ppbv ppbv Sht Term TCEQ Lg Term TCEQ Short Term
Grab 24hr ESL(ppb) Sh Term ESL(ppb) Lg Term ESLBasis
Dec 13 09 5-Feb 18-Feb 18-Feb
C3 Hydrocarbon
C4 Hydrocarbon 58
C5 Hydrocarbon 72 35.50
C6 Hydrocarbon 58 42.00
C8 Hydrocarbon 114 4.64
C9 Hydrocarbon 128 10.60
C10 Hydrocarbon 142 56.40
C12 Hydrocarbon 23.40
C13 Hydrocarbon 184 13.70 11.70
I_M_e_t_h_an_e -J[I o....:p_m-JO2.9pm~ 3.5pm 0 1.9pm 0'-- 1] ..... _
**Indicates the constituent has disaster potential
Laboratory Results
December 13, 2009
_ GDAir Testing Inc.
r>,
www.gdair.com
CLIENT: Alisa Rich
Wolf Eagle
PO Box 270541
Flowermound, TX 75022'
Project No.: Denton Range Resource ~aseline
GO Air Testing Lab. 10:
Report Date:
Date Analyzed:
Analyzed by:
GO Air QC Batch:
Method:
NELAP Certification #:
G009-0347 -001
17-Dec-09
16-Dec-09
LAJ
QC-121609T014
EPAT014
T104704364-09· TX
REPORT OF ANALYTICAL RESULTS Page 1 of 2
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION MATRIX SAMPLE BY SAMPLED DATE IRECEIVED
-300ft. East of Compressor Site Air O.S.
,
12/13/09 . 12115109
CONSTITUENT MW CAS PQL* RESULT NOTE
ppbv ppbv ug/cu M
Benzene 78 71432 0.26 4.81 15.3
Benzylchloride 126.6 100447 0.26 NO NO
Bromomethane (Methyl Bromide) 94.9 74839 0.26 NO NO
Carbon tetrachloride 153.8 56235 0.26 NO NO
Chlorobenzene 112.6 108907 0.26 NO NO
Chloroethane (Ethyl Chloride) 64.5 75003 0.26 NO NO
Chloroform 119 67663 0.26 NO NO
Chloromethane (Methyl Chloride)
50.4
74873 0.26 0.56 1.15
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB) 187.9 106934 0.26 NO ND
1,2-Dichlorobenzene 147 95501 0.26 NO ND
r>;
1,3-Dichlorobenzene 147 541731 0.26 NO ND
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 147 106467 0.26 NO ND
1,1-Dichloroethane 99 75343 0.26 NO ND
1,1-Dichlorethene 97 75354 0.26 NO ND
Dichlorodifluoromethane (F12) 120.9 75718 0.26 0.38 1.88
Dichlorotetrafluoroethane (F114) 170.9 76142 0.26 NO ND
1,2-Dichloroethane (EDC) 99 107062
0.26
NO ND
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 97 156694 0.26 NO ND
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 97 156605
0.26
NO ND
Dichloromethane (Methylene chloride) 84.9 75092 0.26 NO ND
1,2-Dichloropropane 113. 78875 0.26 NO NO
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 111 10061015 0.26 NO ND
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 111 10061026
0.26
NO ND
Ethylbenzene 106 100411 0.26 1.00 4.34
Hexachlorobutadiene 260.8 87683 0.65 NO ND
Styrene 104 100425 0.26 NO ND
1,1,2,2- Tetrachloroethane 167.9 79345 0.26 NO ND
Tetrachloroethene (PCE) 165.8 127184 0.26 NO ND
Toluene 92 108883 0.26 7.93 29.8
1,1,1-Trichloroethane (TCA)
133.4
71556 0.26 NO ND
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
133.4 79005 0.26 NO ND
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene/4-Ethyltoluene 120.2 108678 0.26 2.48 12.2
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 120.2 95636 0.26 0.95 4.67
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 181.5 120821 0.65 NO ND
Trichloroethene (TCE) 131.3 79016
0.26
NO ND
awed
651 N. Plano Road, Suite 429, Richardson, TX 75081, USA • Tel: (972) 480-8908 • Fax (972) 480-8308
~ GD Air Testing Inc. www.gdair.com
r>,
CLIENT: Alisa Rich
Wolf Eagle
PO Box 270541
Flowermound, TX 75022'
Project No.: Denton Range 'Resource Baseline
GD Air Testing lab. 10:
Report Date:
Date Analyzed:
Analyzed by:
GD Air QC Batch:
Method:
NELAP Certification #:
GD09-0347 -001
17-Dec-09
16-Dec-09
LAJ
QC-121609T014
EPAT014
T104704364-09- TX
REPORT OF ANALYTICAL RESULTS Page 2 of2
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION MATRIX SAMPLE BY SAMPLED DATE IRECEIVED
-300ft. East of Compressor Site Air D.S. 12113/09 12/15/09
CONSTITUENT MW CAS PQl* RESULT NOTE
ppbv ppbv ug/cu M
Trichlorofluoromethane (F-11) 137.4
75694 0.26 NO NO
Trichloritrifluoroethane (F-113)
187.4
76131 0.26 NO NO
Vinyl Chloride 62.5 75104 0.26 NO NO
m&p-Xylenes 106 1330207 0.26 5.30 23.0
o-Xylene 106 95476
0.26
2.28 9.88
Tentatively Identified Compounds (TICs)
Unidentified sulfide group 1.29 14.7 NA
C4 Hydrocarbon 58 1.29 6.20 14.7
lsobutane 58 1.29 11.9 28.2
r>.
C5 Hydrocarbon 72 1.29 35.5 105
Carbon disulfide 76 1.29 12.0 37.3
C6 Hydrocarbon 58 1.29 42.0 99.6
C8 Hydrocarbon 114
1.29
4.64 21.6
C9 Hydrocarbon 128 1.29 10.6 55.5
C10 Hydrocarbon 142 1.29 56.4 328
C13 Hydrocarbon 184 1.29 13.7 103
Surrogate Recovery Report Spiked
ppbv
Found
ppbv
R%
1,4-Difluorobenzene (SS1) 118.1· 540363 5.00
Bromofluorobenzene (SS2) 175 460004 5.00
5.59
3.57
112
71
*Comparison with the method blank this sample run with a dilution factor of:
Canister #145 was received at an initial pressure of 0.5psi and pressurized to 4.9psi.
*RESUL TS Listed as 'ND' were not detected at or above the listed PQl (Practical Quantitation Limit).
* The control limit for Surrogate Recovery % of all spiked compound is 70% - 130%. Only one is required to pass.
*Concentrations in ug/cu M reported at 760 mm Hg pressure and 298 deg.K.
*QAlQC reports followed this report; include: Method blank, Blank spike (BS) and Blank spike duplicate (BSO)
1.29
Respectfully submitted
~D ~\'
G~
Laboratory Director
Data File: varian\121609.B\091216-14-0347-1.sms
Report File: GDAIR D:\Client-Report\GD09-0347-001
651 N. Plano Road, Suite 429, Richardson, TX 75081, USA • Tel: (972) 480-8908 • Fax (972) 480-8308
~ GDAir Testing Inc. www. gdair.com
r>.
CLIENT: GO Air Testing, Inc. GO Air Testing Lab. 10: Method Blank
Report Date: 12/17/09
Date Analyzed: 12/16/09
Analyzed by: LAJ
GO Air QC Batch: QC-121609
Project No.: Method: EPAT014
NELAP Certification #: T1 04704364-09- TX
REPORT OF METHOD BLANK RESULTS Page 1 of2
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION MATRIX SAMPLE BY SAMPLED DATE IRECEIVED
BLK Air
CONSTITUENT MW CAS PQL* RESULT NOTE
ppbv ppbv ug/cu M
Benzene 78 71432 . 0.20 NO NO
Benzylchloride 126.6 100447 0.20 NO NO
Bromomethane (Methyl Bromide) 94.9 74839 0.20 NO NO
Carbon tetrachloride 153.8 56235 0.20 NO NO
Chlorobenzene 112.6 108907 0.20 NO NO
Chloroethane (Ethyl Chloride) 64.5 75003 0.20 NO NO
Chloroform 119 67663 0.20 NO NO
Chloromethane (Methyl Chloride) 50.4 74873
0.20
NO NO
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB) 187.9 106934 0.20 NO NO
1,2-Dichlorobenzene 147 95501 0.20 NO NO
~
1,3-Dichlorobenzene 147 541731 0.20 NO NO
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 147 106467 0.20 NO NO
1,1-Dichloroethane 99 75343 0.20 NO NO
1,1-Dichlorethene 97 75354 0.20 NO NO
Dichlorodifluoromethane (F12) 120.9 75718 0.20 NO NO
Dichlorotetrafluoroethane (F114) 170.9 76142 0.20 NO NO
1,2-Dichloroethane (EOC) 99 107062 0.20 NO NO
cis-1,2-0ichloroethene 97 156694 0.20 NO NO
trans-1,2-0ichloroethene 97 156605 0.20 NO NO
Oichloromethane (Methylene chloride) 84.9 75092
0.20
NO NO
1,2-0ichloropropane 113 78875 0.20 NO NO
cis-1,3-0ichloropropene 111 10061015 0.20 NO NO
trans-1,3-0ichloropropene 111 10061026 0.20 NO NO
Ethylbenzene 106 100411 0.20 NO NO
Hexachlorobutadiene 260.8 87683 0.50 NO NO
Styrene 104 100425 0.20 NO NO
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 167.9 79345
0.20
NO NO
Tetrachloroethene (PCE) 165.8 127184 0.20 NO NO
Toluene 92 108883
0.20
NO NO
1,1, 1-Trichloroethane (TCA)
133.4 71556 0.20 NO NO
1,1,2- Trichloroethane
133.4
79005 0.20 NO NO
1,3,5- Trimethylbenzene/4-Ethyltoluene
120.2
108678 0.20 NO NO
1,2,4- Trimethylbenzene 120.2 95636 0.20 NO NO
1,2,4- Trichlorobenzene 181.5 120821 0.50 NO NO
Trichloroethene (TCE) 131.3 79016 0.20 NO NO
r>
65] N. Plano Road, Suite 429, Richardson, TX 7508], USA • Tel: (972) 480-8908 • Fax (972) 480-8308
_ GDAir Testing Inc.
r>.
CLIENT: GO Air Testing, Inc. GO Air Testing Lab. 10:
Report Date:
Date Analyzed:
Analyzed by:
GO Air QC Batch:
Method:
NELAP Certification #:
Project No.: QC
REPORT OF ANALYTICAL RESUL TS
www.gdair.com
Method Blank
12/17/09
12/16/09
LAJ
QC-121609
EPAT014
T104704364-09-TX
Page 2 of2
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION MATRIX SAMPLE BY SAMPLED DATE IRECEIVED
BLK Air
CONSTITUENT MW CAS
137.4
75694
187.4 76131
62.5 75104
106 1330207
106 95476
Trichlorofluoromethane (F-11)
Trichloritrifluoroethane (F-113)
Vinyl Chloride
m&p-Xylenes
o-Xylene
Surrogate Recovery Report
PQL*
ppbv
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.50
0.20
Spiked
ppbv
RESULT NOTE
ppbv uglcu M
NO NO
NO NO
NO NO
NO NO
NO NO
Found R%
ppbv
5.34 106.8
4.61
92.2
1.0
1,4-Difluorobenzene (SS1)
Bromofluorobenzene (SS2)
118.1 540363
175 460004
*Comparison with the method blank this sample run with a dilution factor of:
5.00
5.00
*RESUL TS Listed as 'NO' were not detected at or above the listed PQL (Practical Quantitation Limit).
* The control limit for Surrogate Recovery % of all spiked compound is 70% - 130%. Only one is required to pass.
*Concentrations in uglcu M reported at 760 mm Hg pressure and 298 deg.K.
*QNQC reports followed this report include: Method blank, Blank spike (BS) and Blank spike duplicate (BSD)
Respectfully submitted
GO Air Testing, Inc.
~< f ~;
George~.
Laboratory Director
Data File: c:\Varian\121609.B\091216-13-blk.sms
Report File: GO SRI\D\QC-09-T014\Blank
651 N. Plano Road, Suite 429, Richardson, TX 75081, USA • Tel: (972) 480-8908 • Fax (972) 480-8308
., GDAir Testing Inc. www.gdair.com
CLIENT: GO Air Testing, Inc. GO Air Testing Lab. 10:
Report Date:
Date Analyzed:
Analyzed by:
GO Air QC Batch:
Method:
NELAP Certification #:
BS/BSO
12/17/09
12/16/09
LAJ
QC-121609
EPAT014
T104704364-09- TX
Project No.:
REPORT OF BLANK SPIKE RESULTS Page 1 of 1
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION MATRIX SAMPLE BY SAMPLED DATE IRECEIVED
BS/BSD Air
Spike Control Compounds Spiked Found and Recovery
ppbv BS/ppbv BSR% BSD BSDR% %RPD
VOLATILE ORGANICS BY EPA TO-14
Vinyl Chloride 10.0 10.80 108 10.90 109 0.9
Methylene chloride (Dichloromethane) 10.0 9.20 92.0 9.90 99.0 7.3
1,1,1-Trich loroethane 10.0
10.40
104.0 10.60 106.0 1.9
1,2-Dichloroethane (EDC) 10.0
10.40
104.0 10.90 109.0 4.7
Benzene 10.0 10.00 100.0 10.60 106.0 5.8
Carbon tetrachloride 10.0 10.20 102.0 10.50 105.0 2.9
Trichloroethene (TCE) 10.0
10.40
104.0 10.80 108.0 3.8
Toluene 10.0 8.60 86.0 8.60 86.0 0.0
Chlorobenzene 10.0 9.50 95.0 9.60 96.0 1.0
Ethylbenzene 10.0 9.20 92.0 9.10 91.0 1.1
o-Xylene 10.0 8.50 ' 85.0 9.00 90.0 5.7
Surrogate Recovery Report
1,4-Difluorobenzene (SS 1) 5.0 5.50 110.0 5.78 115.6 5.0
Bromofluorobenzene (SS2) 5.0 5.03 100.6 5.02
100.4
0.2
* The control limit for BS Recovery % of all spiked compound is 70% - 130%
* The control limit for relative percentage difference of BS/BSD is 30%
* If any control compound is not within the control limit, please see the case narrative for more details.
* The control limit for Surrogate Recovery % of all spiked compound is 70% - 130%. Only one is required to pass.
Respectfully submitted
GO Air Testing, Inc.
~~;
George D:.P::
Laboratory Director
Data File: c:\Varian\121609.B\091216-10-bs.sms,091216-11-bsd.sms
Report File: GD\SRI\D:\QC09-T014\BS-BSD _
651 N. Plano Road, Suite 429, Richardson, TX 75081, USA • Tel: (972) 480-8908 • Fax (972) 480-8308
~") Report to: r Invoice to: IANALYSIS
Company,,,aO I! f?'9~J:l'w'tr~ lompany, -:::iJ..CQe "") REQUESTED
Address: eO 8&X~1054L_ Address: _
fltrNir [\161J~-J 'LX
10a~1
tz 13~5:',sllliL~rAfrv~o';~~~3G;oPtetls+ 0f-CmIOVtSSfrr sitf/ .LIXI UJJ---LJ6J_4illO:J-O:?~'l- '--IJ
,_... _--+----\-- I .~+-I-+--I--+- I I I 1--1 I
j i
Contact: .A · -L.tQ::.-1 ::::...JC hU-... _
Phone: 4{Qq -OJ) q -I02..0 1 Phone:
Fax: 912-52q~61 ,PO/SO: -------
Email: rJlh@ we tf' f.Uj1L .enWTnfl.J) {tJ
.1':.::1.0.
Contact:
Sampler's Name (print) Sampler's Signature
Df$(;t~ub;A- t2~ ~
Proj. No. Project Name
I- D~r irn:,,/2a.~e: ()-e.jffJJflg 13.ts&un._f __
1
Datel Time ICan # Identifying Mar,s of Sample(s)
C/)
C,?' 'ti
+-, 'ti §
::c'" r::: 0
o 5 f
- Q.
~'" £ 0
o 0
- "1...
0
'" '-I;::,
.;::.!£:
- 'u;::'
CJ 0 o (1) (/)
O
() I Q..!d ~ (1)
- o C/) c: ~
~ 0'" (1) ra 0 (1)-
C\.i 0 § ~ f!> (/) r:::
0
, ,-. ~Q (J) 0 CI) }g
/-:::. CI) 'n- ~....,
l.J.J (1J~~~ (J)
~%
~CI) § 8 [q g ~
~R-g0~fJ.-g;:.,/:!:g
"'J' I.t) ra 0 ::r: C/) ra .Q - 0
'I- - - 1lJ ~~ 'ti <.> C/) c.. -.J
" '?(-t:::(IJ'O(/jO
f! f! f! fi: :!f ~ if t: Q:: % I Lab Sample 10 (Lab Use Only)
J
I I I I 111---1-11 I I I I I 1 ~
I I I I--- I I I f I I I I I-I I I I
I I I - -+--_.- I --I I I -t--f I ! I I I f- I
"-'~·I-I"~
R~gn~ \ ~() lme Received by, (S;gnalu,") Dale I Time
Relinguished by: (Signature) Date Time Received by: (Signature)
~~~
Date I Time
Remarks
pJ((1 ~I 1:uf LlAny ch.angefor Analysis Request should be submitted by a
VI I!.:> 10, ~ document.
V \ v
Laboratory Results
February 5, 2010
)
Denton )e Resources
Air Monitoring Results uenton City/Range Resources
Estimates of ESLExceedences
February 5,2010
Monitor #2877
Pollutant CAS MW Results Results TCEQ TCEQ Exceeds TCEQ TCEQ Exceeds TCEQ
24-Hour Sample ug/m3 ppbv ShtTerm Sht Term TCEQ LgTerm Lg Term TCEQ Short Term
Venting Operations ESLug/m3 ESL(ppb) Sh Term ESLug/m3 ESL(ppb) Lg Term ESLBasis
TO-14
Chloromethane 74873 50.4 1.33 0.65 1030 500 No 103 50 No Health
Dichlorodifluoromethane (F12) 75718 120.9 2.42 0.49 50000.0 10000.0 No 5000.0 1000.0 No Health
TIC
Isobutane 75285 58 16.00 6.74 4800 2040 No 480 204 No Odor
Camphene 79925 136 15.90 2.85 50 No 5 Yes Health
C3 Hydrocarbon 44 29.50 16.40
C5 Hydrocarbon 72 21.40 7.27
C6 Hydrocarbon 58 7.88 3.32
00 Hydrocarbon 170 74.40 10.70
I
Methane I
-M-e-t-ha-n-e--pp-m--v----------------~-------2-.9--------------~------~------~--------+---------------~--------------+---------
Color Indicators
Is within TCEQ ESLLimits
Is within TCEQ ESLLimits <10%
Is not within TCEQ ESLLimits
*24-hr and annual for monitoring
**Indicates the constituent has disaster potential
~ GD Air Testing Inc.
f)
www.gdair.com
CLIENT: Alisa Rich
Wolf Eagle
PO Box 270541
Flowermound, TX 75022
Project No.: NA
GO Air Testing Lab. 10:
Report Date:
Date Analyzed:
Analyzed by: .
GO Air QC Batch:
Method:
NELAP Certification #:
G010-0021-001
16-Feb-10
10-Feb-1 0
LAJ
QC-021 01OT014
EPAT014
T104704364-09- TX
REPORT OF ANALYTICAL RESULTS Page 1 of 2
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION MATRIX SAMPLE BY SAMPLED DATE IRECEIVED
Denton Air NA 02/05/10 02/09/10
CONSTITUENT MW CAS PQL* RESULT NOTE
ppbv ppbv ug/cu M
Benzene 78 71432 0.5 NO NO
Benzylchloride 126.6 100447 0.5 NO NO
Bromomethane (Methyl Bromide) 94.9 74839 0.5 NO NO
Carbon tetrachloride 153.8 56235 0.5 NO NO
Chlorobenzene 112.6 108907 0.5 NO NO
Chloroethane (Ethyl Chloride) 64.5 75003 0.5 NO NO
Chloroform 119 67663 0.5 NO NO
Chloromethane (Methyl Chloride)
50.4
74873 0.5 0.645 1.33
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB) 187.9 106934 0.5 NO NO
1,2-Dichlorobenzene 147 95501 0.5 NO NO
r>.
1,3-Dichlorobenzene 147 541731 0.5 NO NO
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 147 106467 0.5 NO NO
1,1-Dichloroethane 99 74343 0.5 NO NO
1,1-Dichlorethene 97 75354 0.5 NO NO
Dichlorodifluoromethane (F12) 120.9 75718 0.5 0.49
2.42
Dichlorotetrafluoroethane (F114) 170.9 76142 0.5 NO NO
1,2-Dichloroethane (EDC) 99 107062 0.5 NO NO
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 97 156592 0.5 NO NO
trans-1 ,2-Dichloroethene 97 156605 0.5 NO NO
Dichloromethane (Methylene chloride) 84.9 75092 0.5 NO NO
1,2-Dichloropropane 113 78875 0.5 NO NO
cis-1 ,3-Dichloropropene 111 10061015 0.5 NO NO
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 111 10061026 0.5 NO NO
Ethylbenzene 106 100414 0.5 NO NO
Hexachlorobutadiene 260.8 87683 1.1 NO NO
Styrene 104 100425 0.5 NO NO
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 167.9 79345 0.5 NO NO
Tetrachloroethene (PCE) 165.8 127184 O.S NO NO
Toluene 92 108883 0.5 NO NO
1,1, 1-Trichloroethane (TCA) 133.4
71556 O.S NO NO
1,1,2-Trichloroethane 133.4
79005 0.5 NO NO
1,3,S-Trimethylbenzene/4-Ethyltoluene 120.2 108678 O.S NO NO
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 120.2 95636 0.5 NO NO
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 181.S 120821 1.1 NO NO
Trichloroethene (TCE) 131.3 79016 O.S NO NO
('\
PAGE 2 OF 9
651 N. Plano Road, Suite 429, Richardson, TX 75081, USA • Tel: (972) 480-8908 • Fax (972) 480-8308
_ GDAir Testing Inc. www.gdair.com
CLIENT: Alisa Rich
Wolf Eagle
PO Box 270541
Flowermound, TX 75022
Project No.: NA
GO Air Testing lab. 10:
Report Date:
Date Analyzed:
Analyzed by:
GO Air QC Batch:
Method:
NELAP Certification #:
GD10-0021-001
16-Feb-10
10-Feb-10
LAJ
QC-021010T014
EPAT014
T104704364-09- TX
REPORT OF ANALYTICAL RESULTS Page 2 of 2
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION MATRIX SAMPLE BY SAMPLED DATE IRECEIVED
Denton Air NA 02/05/10 02/09/10
CONSTITUENT MW CAS PQl* RESULT NOTE
ppbv ppbv ug/cu M
Trichlorofluoromethane (F-11)
;37.4
75694 0.5 ND NO
Trichloritrifluoroethane (F-113) 187.4 76131 0.5 ND NO
Vinyl Chloride 62.5 75014 0.5 ND NO
m&p-Xylenes 106 1330207 0.5 ND NO
o-Xylene 106 95476 0.5 ND NO
Tentatively Identified Compounds (TICs)
C3 Hydrocarbon 44 2.3 16.4 29.5
Isobutane 58 2.3 6.74 16.0
C5 Hydrocarbon 72 2.3 7.27
21.4
r>.
C6 Hydrocarbon 58 2.3 3.32 7.88
Camphene 136 2.3 2.85 15.9
C10 Hydrocarbon 170 1.6 10.7
74.4
1,4-Difluorobenzene (SS1) 118.1 540363 5.00
Bromofluorobenzene (SS2) 175 460004 5.00
Spiked
ppbv
Found
ppbv
R% Surrogate Recovery Report
5.52
5.29
110
106
*Comparison with the method blank this sample run with a dilution factor of:
Canister #2877 was received at an initial pressure of -6.3psi and pressurized to 4.4psi.
*RESUl TS Listed as 'ND' were not detected at or above the listed POL (Practical Quantitation Limit).
* The control limit for Surrogate Recovery % of all spiked compound is 70% - 130%. Only one is required to pass.
*Concentrations in ug/cu M reported at 760 mm Hg pressure and 298 deg.K.
*OA/QC reports followed this report include: Method blank, Blank spike (BS) and Blank spike duplicate (BSD)
2.27
Respectfully submitted
GO Air Testing, Inc.
lv\{;y bo· lX,0~
GeOrge Dai, Ph.D.
Laboratory Director
Data File:varian/1 00210-11-0021-1.sms
Report File: GDAIR D:\Client-Report\GD10-0021-001
PAGE 30F 9
651 N. Plano Road, Suite 429, Richardson, TX 75081, USA • Tel: (972) 480-8908 • Fax (972) 480-8308
---------------------------------------------------------------------- -
_ GD Air Testing Inc. www.gdair.com
CLIENT: Alisa Rich
Wolf Eagle
PO Box 270541
Flower Mound, TX 75027
GD Air Testing Lab. ID:
Report Date:
Date Analyzed:
Analyzed by:
GD QC Batch:
Method:
G01 0-0021-1 F
2/18/2010
2/1712010
JCA
QC-021710F
ASTM 1945
Site: NA
REPORT OF ANAL YTICAL RESUL TS Page 1 of 1
SAMPLe: DESCRIPTION MATRIX SAMPLED BY SAMPLED DATE IRECEIVED
Denton Air NA 02/05/10 02/09/10
CONSTITUENT MW PQL* RESULT NOTE
ppmv ppmv
Methane 16.0 2.3 2.9
Ethane 30.0 2.3 NO
Propane 44.0 2.3 NO
Butane 58.0 2.3 NO
Pentane 72.0 2.3 NO
r>.
Hexane 86.0 2.3 NO
Canister #2877 was received at an initial pressure of -6.3psi and was pressurized to 4.4psi.
*Comparision with the method blank this sample run with a dilution factor of: 2.3
*RESUL TS Listed as 'ND' were not detected at or above the listed PQL (Practical Quantitation Limit).
* The control limit for Surrogate Recovery % of all spiked compound is 70% - 130%. Only one is required to pass.
*QAlQC reports followed this report include: Method blank, Blank spike (BS) and Blank spike duplicate (BSD)
Respectfully submitted
GD Air Testing, Inc.
"
f\ --: t , --< t-, ~
W\ lor dJf . ~.JCl,--
Gecirge Dai, Ph.D.
Laboratory Director
Data File: C:\STAR\MODULE16\02170006.RUN
Report File: GDAIR D:\ClienLReport\gd10-0021-1F
PAGE 4 OF 9
651 N. Plano Road, Suite 429, Richardson, TX 75081, USA • Tel: (972) 480-8908 • Fax (972) 480-8308
_ GDAir ~esting Inc.
CLIENT: GO Air T~sting, Inc.
i
!
,
1
GD Air Testing Lab. ID:
Report Date:
Date Analyzed:
Analyzed by:
GD Air QC Batch:
Method:
NELAP Certification #:
Project No.:
REPORT OF METHOD BLANK RESULTS
www.gdair.com
Method Blank
02/10/10
02/10/10
LAJ
QC-021010
EPAT014
T104704364-09-TX
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION MATRIX SAMPLE BY
Page 1 of 2
SAMPLED DATE IRECEIVED
MW CAS
BLK Air
CONSTITUENT PQL*
ppbv
RESULT
ppbv
NOTE
ug/cu M
Benzene II
Benzylchloride
Bromomethane (M$thyl Bromide)
Carbon tetrachloride]
Chlorobenzene i
Chloroethane (Ethyl Chloride)
Chloroform i
Chloromethane (Methyl Chloride)
I
1,2-Dibromoethane (iEDB)
1,2-Dichlorobenzen~
1,3-Dichlorobenzen~
1A-Dichlorobenzenei
1,1-Dichloroethane i
1,1-Dich lorethene i
Dlchlorooinuorornethane (F12)
Dichlorotetrafluoroethane (F114)
1,2-Dichloroethane (EDC)
cis-1 ,2-Dichloroethe~e
trans-1,2-Dichloroetrlene
Dichloromethane (M$thylene chloride)
1,2-Dichloropropane I
cis-1 ,3-Dichloroprop~ne
trans-1,3-Dichloroprdpene
Ethylbenzene I
Hexachlorobutadiene
Styrene I
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
I
Tetrachloroethene (flCE)
Toluene !
1,1, 1-Trichloroethane (TCA)
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
1,3,5- Trimethylbenzdne/4-Ethyltoluene
1,2A-Trirnethylbenzene
1,2A-Trichlorobenzene
I
Trichloroethene (TC~)
I
I
i
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.50
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.50
0.20
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
ND
NO
NO
NO
NO
78 71432
126.6 100447
94.9 74839
153.8 56235
112.6 108907
64.5 75003
119 67663
50.4 74873
187. 9 106934
147 95501
147 541731
147 106467
99 74343
97 75354
120.9 75718
170.9 76142
99 107062
97 156592
97 156605
84.9 75092
113 78875
11110061015
111 10061026
106 100414
260.8 87683
104 100425
167.9 79345
165.8 127184
92 108883
133.4 71556
133.4 79005
120.2 108678
120.2 95636
181.5 120821
131.3 79016
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NO
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NO
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NO
ND
PAGE 50F9
I
651 N. Plano Road, Suite 429, Richardson, TX 75081, USA
• Tel: (972) 480-8908 • Fax (972) 480-8308
----------------------------------------------------------------~~- -
I
I
~ GDAir ~estingInc.
r>.
www.gdair.com
CLIENT: GO Air Ttsting, Inc.
;
GD Air Testing lab. ID:
Report Date:
Date Analyzed:
Analyzed by:
GD Air QC Batch:
Method:
NELAP Certification #:
Method Blank
02/10/10
02/10/10
lAJ
QC-021010
EPAT014
T1 04704364-09- TX
Project No.: QC
REPORT OF ANALYTICAL RESULTS Page 2 of2
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SAMPLED DATE IRECEIVED MATRIX SAMPLE BY
BlK ! Air
CONSTITUENT PQl*
ppbv
RESULT NOTE
ppbv ug/cu M
NO ND
NO ND
NO NO
NO NO
NO ND
Found R%
ppbv
5.48
109.6
5.83 116.6
1.0
MW CAS
137.4
75694
187.4
76131
62.5 75014
106 1330207
106 95476
I
Trichlorofluoromethane (F-11)
Trichloritrifluoroetha'ne (F-113)
Vinyl Chloride I
m&p-Xylenes :
o-Xylene !
i
I
Surrogate Recove~ Report
\
I
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.50
0.20
Spiked
ppbv
1,4-Difluorobenzen~ (SS1)
Bromofluorobenzene (SS2)
118.1 540363
175 460004
5.00
5.00
*Comparison with ttie method blank this sample run with a dilution factor of:
i
I
*RESUl TS Listed as 'NO' were not detected at or above the listed PQl (Practical Quantitation Limit).
;. The control limit fo:r Surrogate Recovery % of all spiked compound is 70% - 130%. Only one is required to pass.
*Concentrations in L!g/cu M reported at 760 mm Hg pressure and 298 deg. K.
*QAlQC reports follc~wedthis report include: Method blank, Blank spike (BS) and Blank spike duplicate (BSD)
Respectfully submitted
GD Air Testing, Inc.1
43-tC~,Do -~~
George Dai, Ph.D. ;
Laboratory Director!
Data File: c:\Varian\~01009-12-blk.sms
Report File: GO SRI\D\QC-10-T014\Blank
!
PAGE 6 OF 9
••
651 N. Plano Road, SJite 429, Richardson, TX 75081, USA • Tel: (972) 480-8908 • Fax (972) 480-8308
I
i
~ GDAir ~estingInc.
r>.
www.gdair.com
I
CLIENT: GO Air T~sting, Inc.
i
i
I
I
Project No.:
GO Air Testing Lab. 10:
Report Date:
Date Analyzed:
Analyzed by:
GD Air QC Batch:
Method:
NELAP Certification #:
BS/BSO
02/10/10
02/10/10
LAJ
QC-021010
EPAT014
T104704364-09- TX
,
I
i
REPORT OF BLANK SPIKE RESULTS Page 1 of 1
I
I
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION MATRIX SAMPLE BY SAMPLED DATE IRECEIVED
BS/BSD
I
Air
I
I
Spike Control com~ounds Spiked Found and Recovery
,
ppbv BS/ppbv BSR% BSD BSDR% %RPD
VOLATILE ORGANrCS BY EPA TO-14
Vinyl Chloride
I
10.0 11.3 113 11.9 119 5.2
I
Methylene chloride (pichloromethane) 10.0 10.4 104 11.3 113 8.3
1,1,1-Trichloroethan,e 10.0 11.0 110 11.5 115
4.4
1,2-Dichloroethane ~EDC) 10.0 10.3 103 10.9 109 5.7
Benzene i 10.0 9.0 90 10.2 102 12.5
Carbon tetrachlorids 10.0 11.1 111 11.8 118 6.1
Trichloroethene (TCE) 10.0 11.3 113 11.7 117 3.5
,
Toluene
i
10.0 8.9 89 8.7 87 2.3
Chlorobenzene 10.0 9.0 90 9.2 92 2.2
Ethylbenzene
I
10.0 9.4 94 10.1 101 7.2
o-Xylene 10.0
9.4
94 10.1 101 7.2
I
i
I
Surrogate Recovery Report
1,4-Difluorobenzen~(SS1) 5.0 5.00 100.0 5.55 111.0 10.4
Bromofluorobenzene (SS2) 5.0 5.80 116.0 6.07 121.4 4.5
I
* The control limit fo~ BS Recovery % of all spiked compound is 70% - 130%
* The control limit for relative percentage difference 'of BS/BSD is 30%
" If any control compound is not within the control limit, please see the case narrative for more details.
* The control limit for Surrogate Recovery % of all spiked compound is 70% - 130%. Only one is required to pass.
Respectfully sUbmit~ed
GD Air Testing, Inc.i
M3 ,-hrr t». ~
George Dai, Ph.D. I
Laboratory Director I
i
Data File: c:\Varian\DAT A\ 10021 0-5-bs.sms, 10021 0-6-bsd.sms
I
Report File: GD\SRl
r
D:\QC-T014\BS-BSD
I
PAGE 7 OF 9
iffiM
651 N. Plano Road, SJite 429, Richardson, TX 75081, USA • Tel: (972) 480-8908 • Fax (972) 480-8308
_ GD Air ;resting Inc.
~
www.gdair.com
CLIENT: GO Air Testinq Inc. QA GO Air Testing Lab. 10:
Report Date:
Date Analyzed:
Analyzed by:
QC-BLK-021710F
2/18/2010
2/1712010
JCA
Method: ASTM 1945
REPORT OF METHOD BLANK RESULTS Page 1 of 1
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION MATRIX SAMPLE BY SAMPLED DATE IRECEIVED .
Method Blank GAS
CONSTITUENT MW PQL* RESULT NOTE
ppmv ppmv
16 1.00 NO
30 1.00 NO
44 1.00 NO
58 1.00 NO
72 1.00 NO
86 1.00 NO
Methane
Ethane
Propane
Butane
Pentane
Hexane
*RESUL TS Listed as iND' were not detected at or above the listed POL (Practical Quantitation Limit).
* The control limit for method blank is < 1.0 ppmv for each compound.
* If any compound is out of control limit, please see the case narrative for more details.
Respectfully submitted
GO Air Testing, Inc. !
t~~\·-~y 6h" Bf)-Y
George Dai, Ph.D. .
Laboratory Director 1
Data File: Varian 3400/C:\STAR\MODULE 16\02170002.RUN
Report File: GDAIR D.:\Client Report\Method-18-blk-021710
1 -
I
!
:
I
i
i
i
i PAGE 8 OF9
651 N. Plano Road, SJite 429, Richardson, TX 75081, USA • Tel: (972) 480-8908 • Fax (972) 480-8308
_ GD Air Testing Inc.
r=>:
www.gdair.com
CLIENT: GO Air Tes~ing Inc. QA GO Air Testing Lab. 10:
Report Date:
Date Analyzed:
Analyzed by:
QC-021710F
2/18/2010
2/17/2010
JCA
Method: ASTM 1945
REPORT OF BLANK SPIKE RESULTS Page 1 of 1
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION MATRIX SAMPLE BY SAMPLED DATE IRECEIVED
BS/BSD GAS
CONSTITUENT
Methane
Ethane
Propane
Butane
Pentane
Hexane
Spiked Found and Recovery NOTE
ppmv
BS .
BS,R% BSD BSD, R% RPD%
50.0 53.6 107 53.3 107 0.6
50.0 53.7 107 54.5 109 1.5
50.0 52.4 105 54.5 109 3.9
50.0 49.0 98 53.4 107 8.6
50.0 44.4 89 51.3 103
14.4
100.0 81.2 81 94.9 95 15.6
~ I
* The control limit for BS Recovery % of all spiked compound is 70% - 130%
** The control limit for relative percentage difference of BS/BSD is 30%
*** If any control compound is not within the control limit, please see the case narrative for more details.
Respectfully submitted
GO Air Testing, Inc. ;
~j -f~YDY .8G~
George Dai, Ph.D.
Laboratory Director i
Data File: C:\STAR\MPDULE16\02170004, 02170005.RUN
Report File: GDAIR O:\Client_Report\ASTM 1945-bs-02171 OF
PAGE90F9
•••• -d?A
651 N. Plano Road, SJite 429, Richardson, TX 75081, USA • Tel: (972) 480-8908 • Fax (972) 480-8308
GD Am, T'estgtng ~nCrn 903. N. Bowser Rd., #200, Richardson, TX 75081 Tel: (972) 480-8908 Fax: (972) 480-8308 CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD
Contact:
en Ol
LU LL
~ ~
...JLU
~ ~
o 0..
I-
Ol
Report to' !
l h\f"\IC ,~._• .IJI f) Invoice to:
Company: \J.~u..\~V<...
Address: 90 '\2 (0,£ mO,S-~
J2(a.,Ulf M()~
1l. '0Dr:J.7
ANALYSIS
REQUESTED
company:~
Address: ""<. S@fV\ f:..
"
-,
',,-
"'-,
Contact: -MlS' fA . 'e.lclh
Phone: 40~ .,g3CJ l D2. D
-. Phone:
Fax: j PO/SO: ~_
Email: .12)f!@wot~ij\eei'\\f\{ch~~tcp~ I
Sampler's Name (print) Sampler's Signature
Pro]. No. Project Name
Date I Time I Can # I Identifying Marks of Sample(s)
?Lt.'.3:·~9.~~,8·m.Jtn ton~-- ~- .. --. _
L_±_ _._ .. ,.. __ .__ .__ ".. __ . .. ._ __
__ , •••__ ~- •••• ,_". __ •••• ""•••••.••••. ~ •••-_. __ •••_....,_._. __ "'_"_- ~n.••• .-,_ ••.•. _ ••••••.•. _._, •••.••••••. _•...• ,•.,~•••,. •• _ .•••••. ~.~._.•••••..•••. ..-..••. "••__ ,•••
!
1-_
!---I---l--~-~.-- ... ----.---- ... -----.--.-- !,
Relinguished by: (Signature) Date Time
i.e;.«
10/
4f}S·
Relinguished by: (Signature) Date
,
Time
Received by: (SignatLlI'e) f Date
7 /'~ /
("'f f- ,/ , 1'1' -, /,/
,i3CA~--l~/:11.)--/- tc
r
/ 0
F~l~a:_ Time ~
-c