Wilkes100
2nd International Conference on Computing Sciences 15-16 November 2013

© All Rights Reserved

16 views

Wilkes100
2nd International Conference on Computing Sciences 15-16 November 2013

© All Rights Reserved

- T1.A_-_Logica_Difusa
- SISTEMAS MECTRONICOS
- Fuzzy Aggregation Semantic Similarity
- A Probabilistic Alternative to Fuzzy Logic Controllers
- Sd Article 51
- 1-s2.0-S0898122102001992-main
- Fuzzy Logic Coordination of Investment Projects
- Multi Objective Fuzzy Linear Programming in Agricultural Production Planning
- hessd-2-1107-2005-print
- Edge_Detection_Using_Fuzzy_Logic.pdf
- Fuzzy_Logic_Basics.pdf
- Fuzzy Logic
- Fuzzy Control
- Discovering Fuzzy Time Interval Sequential Pattern in Sequence Databases
- 9FR-00-5
- applicationoffuzzylogic-160403063322
- Relations on neutrosophic multi sets with properties
- COMPLEX NEUTROSOPHIC GRAPHS OF TYPE 1
- Zhao Collins FAMU FLrobotics
- paper2

You are on page 1of 11

ISBN: 978-93-3107-172-3

Fuzzy rule based expert system to automate university examination

grading

1

Vishu,

1

Prateek Agrawal*,

1

Sanjay Kumar Singh,

2

Leena Jain

1

Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Lovely Professional University, Punjab //

2

Department of Computer Application, Global Institute of Management and Emerging Technologies, Amritsar, Punjab

vishumadaan123gmail.com, prateek061186gmail.com, sanjayksingh.012gmail.com, leenajain79gmail.com

Abstract

This paper work is in regard to represent the application to automate examination grading based on Iuzzy logic approach. The

Proposed work explains a Iuzzy based expert system which would be designed to check students' perIormance and to award

examination grades oI students. Students' perIormance is calculated considering toughness / easiness oI paper level and course

level & the overall perIormance level oI section whereas criteria on the basis oI which grades would be awarded to students, is

determined through course level and paper level. This paper explains the clear objective oI proposed system, its implementation.

DiIIerent deIuzziIication techniques are applied to veriIy the accuracy and robustness oI the system. The proposed system is

implemented Ior evaluating the academic perIormances oI students oI M.Tech, Department oI Computer Science and Engineering

(CSE) oI Lovely ProIessional University, India. The method can also easily be implemented to any academic organization Ior the

perIormance evaluation.

2013 Elsevier Science. All rights reserved.

Keywords: Fuzzy expert system, Fuzzy logic, Academic perIormance evaluation, examination grades

1. Introduction

For years, researchers are Iocusing only on the ways to resolve tasks involving human eIIorts by replacing with

expert systems. Because it is a time consuming way to calculate examination grades oI students manually and it

also leads to inaccurate results most oI time. ThereIore there is a need to develop automated tools that provides

accurate results as here required in the Iorm oI grades oI individual student. Though some study on (Iuzzy system

Ior evaluating students' learning achievement) (Ibrahim Saleh*, 2009) and another study on (Evaluation oI student

perIormance in laboratory applications using Iuzzy logic) (Gokhan Gokmen a*, 2010) have been made, but those

are not strong enough to be eIIectively adopted by all kind oI organizations as there are no organized and

scientiIic academic perIormance evaluation methodology.

One time evaluation oI answer sheets can't judge student's overall learning achievement. There are number oI

parameters that eIIect student's perIormance. It may be the possibility that student appearing in exams oI previous

year is good but unable to attempt paper in a better way than the student appearing in exams oI current year, may

be due to diIIerence in diIIiculty level oI question paper, diIIerence in syllabus oI same course etc. ThereIore, we

can't compare perIormance oI these two students. This shows that not only student level but course level and

paper level also aIIects examination results. It leads to a need oI development oI such system that would be able to

do so automatically.

2. Design of Fuzzy Inference Process for Academic Performance Evaluation System

612 Elsevier Publications, 2013

The overall design oI proposed system is depicted through Iollowing Iigure

1. Corresponding author - Vishnu

Figure 1. Design oI Fuzzy InIerence Process Ior Academic PerIormance Evaluation

2.1 Identification of factors affecting student's performance

This is the initial step towards development i.e., to calculate Iactors inIluencing student's perIormance. There are

number oI Iactors that aIIect student academic perIormance, here we have considered 3 Iactors (Course Level, Paper

Level, Section Level) to check student's (students oI single section) perIormance and 2 Iactors (Course Level and

Paper Level) that are enough to determine the criteria on the basis oI which grades will be awarded to students. The

third level i.e., Section Level Iurther determines Faculty Level. It would be easy to judge about the Iaculty

involvement in improvement oI student's perIormance through section level. Here we have considered three section

oI previous year and Iour sections belong to current year, Ior which perIormance is calculated.

S

pi:

p stands Ior previous year, where i1 to 3.

S

ci:

c stands Ior current year, where i1 to 4.

The Iollowing Iactors determine the university perIormance oI a course based on the Course level, paper level

and section level considering data oI previous year as well as oI current year.

Course Level (CL)

It indicates the diIIiculty level oI subject. Course level is determined using average marks (Continuous Assessment

(CA) Mid Term Examination (MTE) End Term Examination (ETE)) oI students oI each course as shown in

table 1 (previous year (S

p1,

S

p2,

S

p3

), current year (S

c1,

S

c2,

S

c3,

S

c4

)).

The Iormula Ior evaluating course level is constructed as Iollows:

(1)

Where,

Ag

c

Average oI marks (Continuous Assessment (CA) Mid Term Examination (MTE) End Term

Examination (ETE)) oI all courses Ior particular programme (include current year batch).

Sg

c

Standard Deviation oI all the courses (Continuous Assessment (CA) Mid Term Examination (MTE)

End Term Examination (ETE)) Ior particular programme (include previous and current batches).

M

c

Average marks (Continuous Assessment (CA) Mid Term Examination (MTE) End Term

Examination (ETE)) oI particular batch student Ior particular course.

A

c

Average marks (Continuous Assessment (CA) Mid Term Examination (MTE) End Term Examination

(ETE)) oI all the student oI particular batch Ior all the courses.

IdentiIication oI Iactors aIIecting perIormance, Iuzzy linguistic

variables and their membership Iunctions

FuzziIication

Fuzzy Rule Construction

Fuzzy InIerence Generation

DeIuzziIication

Evaluating and Analyzing perIormance

Figure 1. Design oI Fuzzy InIerence Process Ior Academic PerIormance Evaluation

Award grades to students

613 Elsevier Publications, 2013

Vishu, Prateek Agrawal, Sanjay Kumar Singh, Leena jain

Fuzzy ule ased xpert ystem to utomate niversity xamination rading

S

c

Standard deviation oI all courses (include current batch).

Paper Level (PL)

It indicates the diIIiculty level oI question paper, so that we can answer a question that whether question papers oI

current year batch courses are diIIicult or easy Irom the question papers oI last year batch. Paper level is determined

using the average marks End Term Examination oI students oI each course as shown in table 2. Section S

p1,

S

p2,

and S

p3

belong to previous year and section S

c1,

S

c2,

S

c3,

and S

c4

are oI current year Ior which perIormance value

and grades are going to awarded.

The Iormula Ior evaluating course level is constructed as Iollows:

(2)

Where,

Ag

p

Average oI marks (End Term Examination (ETE)) oI all courses Ior particular programme (include

current batch). Sg

p

Standard Deviation oI all the courses (End Term Examination (ETE)) Ior particular

programme (include current batch). M

p

Average marks (End Term Examination) oI particular batch student

Ior particular course.

A

p

Average marks (End Term Examination) oI all the student oI particular batch Ior all the courses.

S

p

Standard deviation oI all courses (include current batch).

Section Level (SL)

It indicates level oI the considered section i.e., to know how much capable oI any section X is. Section level Iurther

explains the perIormance oI the respective Iaculty oI that section. Section level is determined using the average

marks (Continuous Assessment (CA) Mid Term Examination (MTE) End Term Examination (ETE)) all courses

oI each section.

The Iormula Ior evaluating course level is constructed as Iollows:

(3)

Where,

Ag

s

Average oI marks (Continuous Assessment (CA) Mid Term Examination (MTE) End Term

Examination (ETE)) oI all sections (include current and previous year sections) Ior all courses.

Sg

s

Standard Deviation oI all the marks (Continuous Assessment (CA) Mid Term Examination (MTE)

End Term Examination (ETE)) oI all sections (include current and previous year sections).

M

s

Average oI average marks (Continuous Assessment (CA) Mid Term Examination (MTE) End Term

Examination (ETE)) oI all courses Ior particular section.

A

s

Average oI average marks (Continuous Assessment (CA) Mid Term Examination (MTE) End Term

Examination (ETE)) oI all courses oI current year batch sections.

S

s

Standard deviation oI all sections.

Adjusting Factor (AF)

AF is indicating the adjusting Iactor that would be added in the actual marks scored by individual student in a

particular exam oI a particular course Ior the considered section to remove the eIIects oI diIIiculty/easiness oI that

course, paper and also the ability oI the students. AF is calculated by considering course level and paper level. The

value oI AF ranges Irom -10 to 10. Higher the value reIers to toughness oI course, paper and the poor level oI

student and vice versa. When student's marks are adjusted using above deIined adjusting Iactor (AF) then it is

checked that in which category oI grades student's marks Iall, the respective grade would be awarded to that student.

Figure 2 shows diagrammatic view oI overall system. It shows section level will act as an input Ior Iuzzy rule

base1 and other two critical Iactors i.e. course level and paper level will be input oI Iuzzy rule base 2 to Iind grades.

614 Elsevier Publications, 2013

Crisp World Fuzzy World

Input

Figure 2. Block diagram oI proposed system

Table 1. Sample record of marks (ETE+MTE+CA)

Table 2. Sample record of marks (ETE)

Section

S

p1

S

p2

S

p3

S

c1

S

c2

S

c3

S

c4

C

1

37.53 32.28 36.1 62 64.69 61.85 63.63

C

2

57.42 53.34 57.12 59.8 64.43 60.51 63.96

C

3

56.3 49.26 55.2 58.83 59.09 55.89 57.44

C

4

48.21 47.06 53.56 63.03 67.18 65.2 63.48

C

5

56.81 56.44 58.05 46.45 50.39 46.77 49.71

C

6

69.45 67.65 70.72 53.07 59.68 53.62 57.17

C

7

53.43 52.38 54.88 65.83 66.9 65.58 64.96

C

8

68.29 66.18 70.17 68.21 68.21 68.21 68.21

Section

S

p1

S

p2

S

p3

S

c1

S

c2

S

c3

S

c4

C

1

51.275 47.15 49.285 57.9225 62.0175 59.1775 55.0525

C

2

64.025 57.89 60.6875 61.31 66.02 61.42 63.4825

C

3

60.4825 55.55 59.625 57.105 57.835 54.2325 55.735

C

4

53.8975 50.73 51.365 61.745 65.255 64.525 62.0075

C

5

58.705 53.6225 61.185 50.175 55.64 52.28 53.76

C

6

69.6875 66.9 68.8825 58.61 64.02 59.82 60.385

C

7

54.5525 54.2425 55.875 63.585 65.04 64.07 64.1225

C

8

70.3875 67.445 72.4975 54.9683 58.4431 54.7993 55.87625

C

9

56.9675 54.92 60.6875 39.1375 41.8075 38.0675 39.4825

C

10

55.435 54.54 59.5575 39.1375 54.318 47.443 54.775

C

11

53.805 49.41 49.3375 51.529 52.478 46.9875 49.96

C

12

66.7625 64.3375 70.4575 54.9683 58.4431 54.7993 55.87625

Course

Course

Grades

Paper level

PerIormance value Section level

AF(X)

Fuzzy Rule Base 2

Course level

Fuzzy Rule Base 1

615 Elsevier Publications, 2013

Vishu, Prateek Agrawal, Sanjay Kumar Singh, Leena jain

C

9

48 48.94 56.7 28.1 32.31 28.69 28.5

C

10

56 55.65 60.5 45.64 48.82 41.98 48.86

C

11

46.36 40.68 48.85 48.07 49.75 43.31 45.14

C

12

70.34 70.76 68.15 69.75 69.75 69.75 69.75

2.2 Fuzzification of Examination Results

When values oI three Iactors deIined above is calculated then there is a need to IuzziIy those input values.

FuzziIication oI Iactor's values was carried out by converting inputs into membership values oI the Iuzzy sets. Each

Iactor's value is input variables oI the Iuzzy logic based expert system. Course level, paper level and section level

would act as an input Ior Iuzzy system. Each input variable has three trapezoidal membership Iunctions. The Iuzzy

sets oI the input variables and their range are given in Table 3.

Table 3. Fuzzy linguistic variables and their fuzzy elements

2.3 Determination of Fuzzy Rules and Inference Method

The very next step aIter IuzziIication is to generate Iuzzy rules. Fuzzy rules are the knowledge base oI Iuzzy expert

system on the basis oI which expert system takes decision accordingly. The proposed system's creation depends on

appropriate choice oI Iuzzy sets and rules. It is a common situation that experts can only properly solve the problem

with Iorming oI Iuzzy sets and rules and hence there is a need to design proper set oI rules, rules may be designed

by some kind oI automatic means. Figure 3 shows appropriate rules determined to get accurate result.

Fuzzy linguistic input variables with

membership range(0-100)

Fuzzy Linguistic Output variable with

membership range(0-8)

T

o

u

g

h

M

o

d

e

r

a

t

e

E

a

s

y

P

e

r

f

o

r

m

a

n

c

e

L

o

w

A

b

o

v

e

A

v

g

A

v

g

B

e

l

o

w

A

v

g

H

i

g

h

Course Level -10-40 30-70 60-110

0-3 1-5 3-6 4-8 6-9

Paper Level -10-40 30- 70 60-110

Section Level P

o

o

r

A

v

e

r

a

g

e

H

i

g

h

-10-40 30- 70 60-110

616 Elsevier Publications, 2013

Fuzzy ule ased xpert ystem to utomate niversity xamination rading

Figure 3. Fuzzy Rule Base view Ior evaluating academic perIormance

In this proposed system 27 rules are generated aIter consulting domain experts. These IF-THEN Iuzzy rules act as a

knowledge base Ior expert system. The Iuzzy rules are constructed by consulting experts oI Examination Department,

LPU.

Some sample IF-THEN rules Ior academic perIormance calculation Irom the rule base are given as below:

i)

IF (Courselevel is Tough) AND (Paperlevel is Tough) AND (Sectionlevel is Poor) THEN PerIormance is Low.

ii)

IF (Courselevel is Tough) AND (Paperlevel is Tough) AND (Sectionlevel is Average) THEN PerIormance is BelowAvg.

iii)

IF (Courselevel is Moderate) AND (Paperlevel is Tough) AND (Sectionlevel is Poor) THEN PerIormance is Low. Etc.

Similarly continuing this way all rules were generated with consideration oI all possible combinations oI Iactors.

respective SurIace view oI the rule base Ior evaluating academic perIormance oI students is generated and shown in Iigure 4.

Figure 4. SurIace view oI the rule base Ior evaluating academic perIormance oI students

617 Elsevier Publications, 2013

Vishu, Prateek Agrawal, Sanjay Kumar Singh, Leena jain

2.4 Fuzzy Inference Generation

To implement this proposed system standard Max-min (Mamdani) inIerence algorithm has been used in this

Iuzzy inIerence process, as it is considered to be most popularly used Iuzzy inIerence strategy (Ngai, 2003).

Mamdani inIerence method is intuitive and widely accepted. It is also suited to human input. (The mathworks,

2009). There are 27 rules deIined Ior this system. There may be a possibility that several rules are active Ior the

same output membership Iunction. It is mandatory that only one membership value is chosen. In this paper, we

used the method proposed by Mamdami, which is represented by Iollowing equation:

With the help oI above equation it is determined that what would be an output membership Iunction value Ior

e

ach active rule. When one rule is active, an AND operation is applied between inputs. The smaller input value is

chosen and its membership value is determined as membership value oI the output Ior that rule. This method is

repeated, so that output membership Iunctions are determined Ior each rule. At the end, 'min' operation is applied

between inputs and max operations are between outputs.

2.5 Defuzzification

When the inIerence process is complete, the resulting data Ior each output oI the Iuzzy classiIication system are

a collection oI Iuzzy sets or a single, aggregate Iuzzy set. Proposed system is deIuzziIied with help oI 'Centroid'

method as it produces crisp` output data by computing the horizontal-axis component oI the geometric centroid oI

the Iuzzy set.

2.6 Evaluating, Analyzing and Ranking performance

To assure robustness oI our proposed system it is necessary to analyze perIormance oI students using diIIerent

deIuzziIication methods. DiIIerent input values are entered into system and their corresponding rank is mentioned

in table 4.

Table 4. Ranking oI diIIerent perIormance obtained Irom diIIerent inputs aIter deIuzziIications

C

o

u

r

s

e

l

e

v

e

l

(

C

L

)

P

a

p

e

r

L

e

v

e

l

(

P

L

)

S

e

c

t

i

o

n

L

e

v

e

l

(

S

L

)

Defuzzified Performance and Rankings

L

O

M

R

a

n

k

s

M

O

M

R

a

n

k

s

B

I

S

E

C

T

O

R

R

a

n

k

s

C

E

N

T

R

O

I

D

R

a

n

k

s

S

O

M

R

a

n

k

s

20 30 32 1.76 2 1.52 1 1.76 2 2 2 1.28 2

25 25 50 3.04 3 3 3 2.96 4 3 3 2.96 6

45 29 20 1.52 1 1.52 1 1.52 1 1.5 1 1.52 3

26 22 89 4.48 6 4.48 5 4.48 6 4.5 7 4.48 4

50 19 56 3.04 3 3 3 2.96 4 3 3 2.96 6

27 56 22 3.04 3 3 3 2.96 4 3 3 2.96 6

76 22 15 1.52 1 1.52 1 1.52 1 1.5 1 1.52 3

56 15 87 4.48 6 4.48 5 4.48 6 4.5 7 4.48 8

24 54 46 4.48 6 4.48 5 4.48 6 4.5 7 4.48 8

88 23 57 4.48 6 4.48 5 4.48 6 4.5 7 4.48 8

38 34 55 3.76 4 3 3 3.36 5 3.44 5 2.24 5

62 31 35 4 5 2.4 2 2.88 3 3.04 4 0.8 1

15 28 65 5.2 8 3.6 4 3.6 6 3.56 6 2 4

22 76 33 4.88 7 4.48 5 4.48 7 4.5 7 4.08 7

In table 5, ranks are provided with respective to each input and it is Iound that all inputs (CL, PL, and SL) got almost

same rank in all deIuzziIication methods. It shows accuracy oI this model. It assures us to give eIIicient and reliable

results when would be applied in any educational organization.

(4)

618 Elsevier Publications, 2013

Fuzzy ule ased xpert ystem to utomate niversity xamination rading

Table 5. Performance value obtained using fuzzy logic

Course Name Course Level Paper Level Section Name Section Level Performance

C

1

49.03959 48.31345 S

c1

75.89105 8

49.03959 48.31345 S

c2

29.17163 3.04

49.03959 48.31345 S

c3

63.66274 5.04

49.03959 48.31345 S

c4

34.1833 3.76

C

2

52.95846 50.90173 S

c1

75.89105 8

52.95846 50.90173 S

c2

29.17163 3.04

52.95846 50.90173 S

c3

63.66274 5.04

52.95846 50.90173 S

c4

34.1833 3.76

C

3

49.11318 48.04503 S

c1

75.89105 8

49.11318 48.04503 S

c2

29.17163 3.04

49.11318 48.04503 S

c3

63.66274 5.04

49.11318 48.04503 S

c4

34.1833 3.76

C

4

51.73864 51.87953 S

c1

75.89105 8

51.73864 51.87953 S

c2

29.17163 3.04

51.73864 51.87953 S

c3

63.66274 5.04

51.73864 51.87953 S

c4

34.1833 3.76

C

5

47.34004 42.8714 S

c1

75.89105 8

47.34004 42.8714 S

c2

29.17163 3.04

47.34004 42.8714 S

c3

63.66274 5.04

47.34004 42.8714 S

c4

34.1833 3.76

C

6

53.3115 49.19686 S

c1

75.89105 8

53.3115 49.19686 S

c2

29.17163 3.04

53.3115 49.19686 S

c3

63.66274 5.04

53.3115 49.19686 S

c4

34.1833 3.76

C

7

52.79684 52.72017 S

c1

75.89105 8

52.79684 52.72017 S

c2

29.17163 3.04

52.79684 52.72017 S

c3

63.66274 5.04

52.79684 52.72017 S

c4

34.1833 3.76

C

8

51.33217 56.38654 S

c1

75.89105 8

51.33217 56.38654 S

c2

29.17163 3.04

51.33217 56.38654 S

c3

63.66274 5.04

51.33217 56.38654 S

c4

34.1833 3.76

C

9

39.9662 31.50506 S

c1

75.89105 4.72

39.9662 31.50506 S

c2

29.17163 1.68

39.9662 31.50506 S

c3

63.66274 3.68

39.9662 31.50506 S

c4

34.1833 2.08

C

10

43.83309 42.04994 S

c1

75.89105 8

43.83309 42.04994 S

c2

29.17163 3.04

43.83309 42.04994 S

c3

63.66274 5.04

43.83309 42.04994 S

c4

34.1833 3.76

C

11

43.80999 40.47484 S

c1

75.89105 8

43.80999 40.47484 S

c2

29.17163 3.04

43.80999 40.47484 S

c3

63.66274 5.04

43.80999 40.47484 S

c4

34.1833 3.76

C

12

50.95211 56.99712 S

c1

75.89105 8

50.95211 56.99712 S

c2

29.17163 3.04

50.95211 56.99712 S

c3

63.66274 5.04

50.95211 56.99712 S

c4

34.1833 3.76

619 Elsevier Publications, 2013

Vishu, Prateek Agrawal, Sanjay Kumar Singh, Leena jain

Experimental results and Discussion

For experimentation we have used data collected Irom Lovely ProIessional University Phagwara (Punjab) India.

Above tables shows average marks oI all courses oI each section oI M.TECH Irom the Department oI Computer

Science and Engineering, Lovely ProIessional University. Formula deIined in equations 1, 2, 3 is applied to

calculate all Iactors. For previous years we have used data oI 2011 batch and grades are calculated oI 2012 batch

year students. On applying Fuzzy Logic approach on that data, we obtain a PerIormance value Ior each section

having same Course and Paper Level. Obtained PerIormance values oI all courses Ior all sections i.e., 48

combinations are listed in table 6.

2.7 Awarding Grades

DiIIerent universities have their own category oI grades and their range. A sample oI categories oI grade and

their range is as shown in table 5.

Table 5. Range oI grades

Grade Range

A Above 85

A 75-85

B 65-74

C 55-64

D 45-54

D- 35-44

E Below 35

II suppose student scored 54 in a course aIter adding AF marks become 62, would be awarded as grade 'C'. In this

case it may be the possibility that course level, paper level is Tough and student is poor in this course.

3. Conclusion

According to this proposed new method Ior students academic perIormance evaluation system obtained results

are very reliable and unbiased result comes out which proves a Iare way oI grading Ior all students. On the other

hand iI we talk about Traditional methods oI grading which are adhered to a constant mathematical rule, evaluation

with Iuzzy logic provides great Ilexibility and reliability.

In conclusion, this application is not only to check perIormance oI theoretical lessons oI engineering students

but can also be used Ior other educational domain like e-learning and distance education provided by Open

University system in India. To do proposed work successIully Iuzzy logic approach has been used to evaluate

student's perIormance, this system may be an application based on combination oI Neuro-Fuzzy technique in Iuture.

It may also be more justiIiable and accurate using one more Iactor that eIIects student's perIormance i.e., Faculty

Level.

References

|1| Biswas, R. An application oI Iuzzy sets in student's evaluation. Elsvier Science , pp. 18, (1995).

|2| C.C.Yee, Y. PerIormance Appraisal System using MultiIactorial Evaluation Model. International Journal of Human and Social Sciences , pp.

15, (2010).

|3| Chiung Moon, J. L. An implementation case Ior perIormance appraisal and promotion ranking. IEEE , pp. 17, (2007).

|4| Gokhan Gokmen a*, T. C. evaluation oI student perIormance in laboratory applications using Iuzzy logic. Elsevier Science Ltd , pp. 902909,

(2010).

|5| Gokhan Gokmen, T. C. Evaluation students learning achievment using Iuzzy logic. Elsevier Science Ltd , pp. 902909, (2010).

|6| Ibrahim Saleh, S.-i. K. A Iuzzy system Ior evaluating student's learning achievement. Esevier Science Ltd , pp. 62366243, (2009).

|7| K, D. The essence oI expert system. England: Prentice-Hall, (2000).

|8| L.A., Z. Fuzzy sets. InIormation and Control, pp. 338353, (1965).

|9| Nolan, J. R. An expert Iuzzy classiIication system Ior supporting the grading oI student , Expert Systems With Applications, pp. 5968, (1998).

|10| P, J. Introduction to expert systems. England: Addison Wesley, (1990).

620 Elsevier Publications, 2013

Fuzzy ule ased xpert ystem to utomate niversity xamination rading

|11| Ramjeet Singh Yadav, V. P. Modeling Academic PerIormance Evaluation Using SoIt Computing Techniques: A Fuzzy Logic Approach.

IJCSE , 676686, (2011).

|12| Shih-Ming Bai, S.-M. C. Evalating students learning achievemnt using Iuzzy membership Iunctions and Iuzzy rules. Elsevier Science , 399

410, (2008).

|13| Shilpa Ingoley. Use oI Fuzzy Logic in Evaluating Students` Learning Achievement.

pp. 4754, (2012).

|14| Sivanandam, S. a. Introduction to fuzzy logic using Matlab, (2006).

|15| http://www.mathworks.com/access/helpdesk/help/pdf_doc/fuzzy/fuzzy.pdf.

|16| Zadeh, L. A. Making computers think like people. IEEE. Spectrum, pp. 2632, (1984).

|17| Zimmermann, H. J. Fuzzy Set Theory and its Applications. Boston, MA: Kluwer. (1991).

621 Elsevier Publications, 2013

Vishu, Prateek Agrawal, Sanjay Kumar Singh, Leena jain

Index

A

Academic performance evaluation system, 612617

D

Defuzzification, 618

F

Fuzzy expert system

academic performance evaluation system, 612617

Fuzzy inference generation, 618

Fuzzy inference process, 612

adjusting factor (AF), 614

analyzing and ranking performance, 618

awarding grades, 620

course level (CL), 613614

defuzzification, 618

evaluating, 618

of examination results, 616

paper level (PL), 614

rules and inference method, determination process, 616617

section level (SL), 614

- T1.A_-_Logica_DifusaUploaded byq234234234
- SISTEMAS MECTRONICOSUploaded byWilmer Alfredo Conde
- Fuzzy Aggregation Semantic SimilarityUploaded byJorge Martinez Gil
- A Probabilistic Alternative to Fuzzy Logic ControllersUploaded byAugusto Firmo
- Sd Article 51Uploaded bylmpallas
- 1-s2.0-S0898122102001992-mainUploaded bynadimduet1
- Fuzzy Logic Coordination of Investment ProjectsUploaded byAssesaHD
- Multi Objective Fuzzy Linear Programming in Agricultural Production PlanningUploaded byIJSTR Research Publication
- hessd-2-1107-2005-printUploaded bySudharsananPRS
- Edge_Detection_Using_Fuzzy_Logic.pdfUploaded byumeshgangwar
- Fuzzy_Logic_Basics.pdfUploaded byZahid Yousaf
- Fuzzy LogicUploaded bySubitsha Parameswaran
- Fuzzy ControlUploaded byandreassetiawan
- Discovering Fuzzy Time Interval Sequential Pattern in Sequence DatabasesUploaded byAckielKhan
- 9FR-00-5Uploaded byBarikly Robby
- applicationoffuzzylogic-160403063322Uploaded byMelissa Miller
- Relations on neutrosophic multi sets with propertiesUploaded byAnonymous 0U9j6BLllB
- COMPLEX NEUTROSOPHIC GRAPHS OF TYPE 1Uploaded byAnonymous 0U9j6BLllB
- Zhao Collins FAMU FLroboticsUploaded byBui Huu Binh
- paper2Uploaded byAnil Kumar
- Several Similarity Measures of Interval Valued Neutrosophic Soft Sets and Their Application in Pattern Recognition ProblemsUploaded byDon Hass
- 6.0 Fuzzy SetsUploaded bymir1973
- 566054744Uploaded byramkumar31
- New Techniques Applied to Post-earthquake Assessment of Buildings (Carreño, Et Al. 2004)Uploaded byJose Manuel
- 1-s2.0-S0377221798001568-mainUploaded byYahya Darmawan
- Fuzzy ApproachUploaded byraghav_bhatt8817
- Multi-Objective Neutrosophic Optimization Technique and its Application to Structural DesignUploaded byMia Amalia
- CS409 AssignmentUploaded byRasika Bandara
- [IJCT-V2I2P21] Authors :S.N.Nandhini, Mr.R. Augustian IssacUploaded byIjctJournals
- FKEE - AQEEL SAKHY JABER %28CD8892%29 - CHAP 1.pdfUploaded byVignesh Ramakrishnan

- Session 05_Paper 71Uploaded byNicholas Dawson
- Session 05_Paper 81Uploaded byNicholas Dawson
- Session 05_Paper 80Uploaded byNicholas Dawson
- Session 05_Paper 79Uploaded byNicholas Dawson
- Session 05_Paper 70Uploaded byNicholas Dawson
- Session 04_Paper 53Uploaded byNicholas Dawson
- Session 05_Paper 78Uploaded byNicholas Dawson
- Session 05_Paper 77Uploaded byNicholas Dawson
- Session 05_Paper 76Uploaded byNicholas Dawson
- Session 05_Paper 75Uploaded byNicholas Dawson
- Session 05_Paper 74Uploaded byNicholas Dawson
- Session 05_Paper 73Uploaded byNicholas Dawson
- Session 05_Paper 72Uploaded byNicholas Dawson
- Session 05_Paper 69Uploaded byNicholas Dawson
- Session 05_Paper 68Uploaded byNicholas Dawson
- Session 05_Paper 67Uploaded byNicholas Dawson
- Session 05_Paper 65Uploaded byNicholas Dawson
- Session 05_Paper 66Uploaded byNicholas Dawson
- Session 04_Paper 64Uploaded byNicholas Dawson
- Session 04_Paper 63Uploaded byNicholas Dawson
- Session 04_Paper 61Uploaded byNicholas Dawson
- Session 04_Paper 62Uploaded byNicholas Dawson
- Session 04_Paper 60Uploaded byNicholas Dawson
- Session 04_Paper 59Uploaded byNicholas Dawson
- Session 04_Paper 58Uploaded byNicholas Dawson
- Session 04_Paper 57Uploaded byNicholas Dawson
- Session 04_Paper 56Uploaded byNicholas Dawson
- Session 04_Paper 55Uploaded byNicholas Dawson
- Session 04_Paper 54Uploaded byNicholas Dawson

- Artificial Intelligence Tcm4-123688Uploaded byKing Sree
- Structure of Management Information SystemsUploaded byDr Rushen Singh
- New Approach to Casting Defects Classification and Analysis Supported by SimulationUploaded byvasek28
- ijettjournal-v1i1p17Uploaded bysurendiran123
- Xpert Sys PresentUploaded byovaiskhatri
- An Expert system proposalUploaded byYeroid Diorey Potestas
- 9781111533960_PPT_ch13Uploaded byNorman Ronald
- ICT Applications NotesUploaded byJasmine Ho
- Business Intelligence and Analytics Decision Support System By Ramesh Sharda.pdfUploaded byroshniw
- laudon_mis_6ce_ch11-1.docUploaded byRyan
- Management Information System Chapter 10 GTU MBAUploaded byRushabh Vora
- Fuzzy Cognitive MapsUploaded bykoulis123
- 1 Introduction to Expert systemUploaded byAmrinder Singh
- McLeod CH11Uploaded byAwanda Putra
- Shipyard Space Allocation and SchedulingUploaded bydichauvin
- 14841_bia_unit-1_part-3Uploaded byPankajPetwal
- MIS Ch10 KnowledgeUploaded byAnnie
- ebookv1-c1.pdfUploaded byDhirendra Thapa
- Paper 47-Internet of Things Based Expert System for Smart AgricultureUploaded bydsdsds
- What is artificial Intelligence - John McCarthyUploaded byDaniel Hernandez Toledo
- Knowledge-based parametric design of mechanical products based on configuration design methodUploaded byShanvens Wong
- Expert Systems PDFUploaded bySyed
- 9759562-CH08.pptUploaded byJudy Anne Salucop
- Analyzing a Quality Function DeploymentUploaded byJose Manuel Oliveira Pereira
- nonUploaded byAzeryna Mike
- A fuzzy inference system for pump failure diagnosis to improve maintenance process.pdfUploaded byAlexander Mauricio Bedón Ipial
- AI-mod1Uploaded byRose Maria Dominic
- Repos BooksUploaded bywindbeast
- ssg 313.docxUploaded byBohluwahtyfe Fahshinah
- lec5Uploaded byRavi Syaniya