NS solver for supersonic flow

© All Rights Reserved

2 views

Tfaws05 Sakwaboa Id

NS solver for supersonic flow

© All Rights Reserved

- History of CFD work in India
- Predicting Pressure Distributions Using CFD
- Unstructured Grid Generation for Aerospace Applications (1999)
- viscous
- Luay S. Alansari
- 114Hai
- LOLLI
- Modeling and Experimental Study of Newtonian Fluid Flow in Annulus
- SL-08-005 Final
- Assessment of CFD Work in India [Gopal R. Shevare]
- xx
- chapter 3
- Computationa Fluid Dynamics CFD Handouts 2014
- CFD Application Tutorials 1
- Related Studies
- STUDY BEGG AND BRILL.pdf
- Consequence Modelling
- Boundary Layer Theory-SCHILSCHTING
- Variational Methods for CFD_Alouges & Maury.pdf
- OTC-23968-MS-P.pdf

You are on page 1of 9

Student, Center for Aerospace Research, NCATSU, Greensboro, NC 27411, AIAA Student Member

** Director, Center for Aerospace Research, NCATSU, Greensboro, NC 27411, AIAA Senior Member

1

NAVIER STOKES SOLVER FOR A SUPERSONIC FLOW

OVER A REARWARD-FACING STEP

Stephen Akwaboa*, and Frederick Ferguson**

Center for Aerospace Research

North Carolina A &T State University

Greensboro, North Carolina, 27411

sa020326@ncat.edu

Abstract: In this study, the classical MacCormack explicit unsteady scheme are modified and smartly programmed

to serve as the basis for a Navier-Stokes Solver. A two dimensional code capable of solving the perfect gas dynamic

equations are developed. Geometry of particular interest used to solve the fluid flow problem is the rearward-facing

step. The governing equations are programmed using FORTRAN to solve the 2D planar Navier-Stokes equations.

The solution results are visualized using TECPLOT. Supersonic flow over the rearward facing step is strategically

solved using a flat plate solution paradigm. Parametric studies performed indicate that the Mach number and the step

height affect flow characteristics such as corner expansion, recirculation zone, and the base pressure which are of

great importance in the design of SCRAMJET engine. As the Mach number increases, both the base pressure and

the recirculation region decrease significantly. Also an increase in step height causes the base pressure and the size

of the recirculation region to decrease. Since the size and flow properties of the recirculation zone could strongly

affect the ignition and combustion processes of the overall combustor of a SCRAMJET engine, the volume of this

recirculation region must therefore be well predicted for SCRAMJET engines.

Nomenclature:

Density

u Velocity in the x-direction

v Velocity in the y-direction

e Internal energy

T Temperature

V Magnitude of velocity vector

x

q Heat flux in the x-direction

y

q Heat transfer in the y-direction

p Pressure

Dynamic (absolute) viscosity

xx

Normal stress in the x direction

yy

Normal stress in the y direction

xy

Shear stress in the y direction exerted in a plane perpendicular to x direction

k Thermal conductivity

U Solution vector of Navier-Stokes equation

E

i

Inviscid flux vector in the x-direction

E

v

Viscous flux vector in the x-direction

E E

i

-E

v

* Ph.D. Student, Center for Aerospace Research, NCATSU, Greensboro, NC 27411, AIAA Student Member

** Director, Center for Aerospace Research, NCATSU, Greensboro, NC 27411, AIAA Senior Member

2

F

i

Inviscid flux vector in the y-direction

F

v

Viscous flux vector in the y-direction

y Incremental change in distance along y-direction

x Incremental change in distance along x-direction

1. Introduction:

While computational fluid dynamics (CFD) hold a lot of promise and has led to significant improvements

in the art of aircraft design, many of its anticipated gains are yet to be realized. In particular, the aerodynamic design

of an aircraft requires a critical understanding of the flow around candidate shapes, since the complexity of the

problem itself precludes analytic solutions. However, CFD has not yet fullfilled its promise of readily providing a

workable solution. Nonetheless, the careful use of CFD tools can be very useful in two phases of aerodesign

analysis, namely, the conceptual and the preliminary phases. Traditionally, designers rely on wind tunnels to

determine aerodynamic properties, but the expense of running different configurations quickly becomes prohibitive,

both in terms of direct financial cost and time. Notwithstanding these CFD related advantages, the time and

expertise required to move from a preliminary aerodesign configuration to a desired candidate is still too long. The

key goal, therefore, is to improve the efficiencies of CFD tools thus making aerodesigners more productive.

Various numerical schemes have been used to study flows over different flow geometries, e.g. flat plate,

rearward-facing step, and base flows. These studies led to the existence of a large number of experimental and

analytical solutions [1-9]. The task of a posteriori evaluation of the quality of the solution to a CFD code problem is

an important issue for aerospace designers, researchers, and code developers. Also, the inability of CFD tools to

facilitate inexperienced users with limited training is a serious set back. Today, there is a growing family of

sophisticated commercial CFD packages using diverse solution methodologies on the market

.

This paper focuses on the development of a new CFD tool and is designed to overcome the aforementioned

shortcomings. Further, this tool is designed with the users in mind; it is built to be user-friendly with capabilities to

accept any conceptual fluid flow through the smart use of boundary conditions. Also, it is designed to guide users in

formulating their concepts by providing workable solutions in a short time. On the whole, it is geared to provide

reliable predictions to aerospace concepts before valuable resources are committed to their realization. In this paper ,

the complete set of Navier-Stokes equations with minimum assumptions is solved numerically. The numerical

solution process uses the MacCormacks explicit time marching scheme.

2. Governing Equations:

The equations describing the planar flow a Newtonian fluid are the two dimensional, unsteady Navier-

Stokes equations. These can be written in non-dimensional strong conservation form in Cartesian coordinates as:

(1)

where the vector, U, is the solution vector and the vectors, E and F, are the inviscid fluxes in the x and y directions,

respectively, and where the viscous fluxes are defined by the vectors, E

v

and F

v

. The expressions used to defined the

flux vectors are described below,

( ) ( ) 0 = +

+ +

v v

F F

y

E E

x t

U

* Ph.D. Student, Center for Aerospace Research, NCATSU, Greensboro, NC 27411, AIAA Student Member

** Director, Center for Aerospace Research, NCATSU, Greensboro, NC 27411, AIAA Senior Member

3

!

!

!

!

!

!

"

#

$

$

$

$

$

$

%

&

+

=

H u

v u

T

M

u

u

E

2

2

1

;

( )

!

!

!

!

!

"

#

$

$

$

$

$

%

&

+

=

x xy xx

xy

xx

v

q v u

E

0

;

!

!

!

!

!

!

"

#

$

$

$

$

$

$

%

&

+

=

H v

T

M

v

v u

v

F

2

2

1 ;

( )

!

!

!

!

!

"

#

$

$

$

$

$

%

&

+

=

y yy xy

yy

xy

v

q v u

F

0

;

The solution vector is defined as:

!

!

!

!

!

"

#

$

$

$

$

$

%

&

=

t

E

v

u

U

(2)

The energy terms, E

t

and H, along with the viscous terms are also defined as follows:

2

.

) 1 (

1

2 2

2

v u

T

M

E

t

+

+

;

2

.

) 1 (

1

2 2

2

v u

T

M

H

+

+

;

!

!

"

#

$

$

%

&

y

v

x

u

xx

2

3

2

Re

1

;

!

!

"

#

$

$

%

&

x

u

y

v

yy

2

3

2

Re

1

;

!

!

"

#

$

$

%

&

x

v

y

u

xy

Re

1

;

( ) x

T

k

M

q

x

=

.

. Pr 1 Re

1

2

;

( ) y

T

k

M

q

y

=

.

. Pr 1 Re

1

2

;

* Ph.D. Student, Center for Aerospace Research, NCATSU, Greensboro, NC 27411, AIAA Student Member

** Director, Center for Aerospace Research, NCATSU, Greensboro, NC 27411, AIAA Senior Member

4

The non-dimensionalization process was conducted in accordance with the following expressions:

=

u

u

u ;

=

v

v

v ;

=

T

T

T ;

=

k

k

k

k

k

k

= = =

;

L

t u

t

= ;

L

x

x = ;

L

y

y = ;

=

u

a

a

3. Solution Methodology:

MacCormaks method, first introduced in 1969, for the past 15 years has been the most popular explicit

finite-difference method for solving fluid flow problems, Ref. 10. This method is based on Taylors series expansion

of U vector with respect to time using the predictor-corrector method. The expressions describing the predictor and

corrector stages of the MacCormack scheme are defined as follows,

Predictor Step:

'

'

(

)

*

*

+

,

+ +

'

'

(

)

*

*

+

,

+ +

=

+ +

y

F F F F

x

E E E E

t

U j i v 1 j i v j i v j 1 i v

f

, , , ,

) ( ) ( ) ( ) (

Corrector Step:

'

'

(

)

*

*

+

,

+ +

'

'

(

)

*

*

+

,

+ +

=

y

F F F F

x

E E E E

t

U 1 j i v j i v j 1 i v j i v

b

, , , ,

) ( ) ( ) ( ) (

Average Derivative:

'

'

(

)

*

*

+

,

t

U

t

U

5 0

t

U

b f avg

.

In addition, the process of updating the solution vector is given as follows:

t

t

U

U U

avg

old new

+ = (2)

* Ph.D. Student, Center for Aerospace Research, NCATSU, Greensboro, NC 27411, AIAA Student Member

** Director, Center for Aerospace Research, NCATSU, Greensboro, NC 27411, AIAA Senior Member

5

4. Preliminary Results:

The graphs below show some preliminary results obtained so far. The pressure distribution, shown in

Figure 1 depicts that as the flow advances downstream, there is a large static pressure drop at the location of the

step. This pressure drop is not ideal for the SCRAMJET engine as it affects the flame-holding ability of the engine.

Increasing the Mach number decreases the base pressure significantly. From the design methodology point of view,

the gross engine thrust from a SCRAMJET is directly proportional to the total pressure [11]. Hence the supersonic

combustor of a hypersonic engine requires a higher combustor inlet Mach number to avoid total pressure loss and

achieve a higher thrust. This, however, affects the successful ignition of the engine due to low base pressure and the

small size of the recirculation zone.

Figure 1. Static Pressure Distribution (M=2.5, Re=1000, sh = y 15 )

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4

1.6

0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5

X

P

r

e

s

s

u

r

e

M=1.83

M=2.5

M=3.5

* Ph.D. Student, Center for Aerospace Research, NCATSU, Greensboro, NC 27411, AIAA Student Member

** Director, Center for Aerospace Research, NCATSU, Greensboro, NC 27411, AIAA Senior Member

6

(a) (b)

Fig.2: Pressure Distribution on the surface downstream the step

(a) Previous Study [9], (b) present work

(a)

Figure 3: Mach number distribution Figure 4: Pressure contour downstream of step

* Ph.D. Student, Center for Aerospace Research, NCATSU, Greensboro, NC 27411, AIAA Student Member

** Director, Center for Aerospace Research, NCATSU, Greensboro, NC 27411, AIAA Senior Member

7

Figure 6: Temperature distribution

Figure 5: Pressure distribution

Figure 7: Velocity field vector plot

* Ph.D. Student, Center for Aerospace Research, NCATSU, Greensboro, NC 27411, AIAA Student Member

** Director, Center for Aerospace Research, NCATSU, Greensboro, NC 27411, AIAA Senior Member

8

5. Conclusion:

The study presents an improved numerical method to solve the Navier-stokes equations for a flow over a

rearward facing step. The validity of these results is confirmed by established experimental data. For example, as it

can be seen in Figures 2 and 6 several characteristics of the flow field, namely, in the expansion-corner, in the free

shear layer, the recirculation zones, and the recompression region, are well captured by the numerical scheme.

References

[1] A. S. Yang, W. H. Hsieh, K.K. Kao, Theoretical Study of supersonic flow separation over a rearward-

facing step, Journal of propulsion and power, Vol. 13, No. 2, March-April 1997, pp 324-326.

[2] Eugene S. Love, Carl E. Grigsby, A new shadow graph taken for the observation of conical flow

phenomenon in supersonic flow and preliminary result obtained for a triangular wing, National Advisory

Committee for Aeronautics, Technical Notes 2950, 1953.

[3] Engineering Mechanics Research Corporation (EMRC), http://www.emrc.com/webpages/fluid/rocket.htm.

[4] Chang-Shing Tai, Ar-Fu Kao, Navier-Stoke Solver for hypersonic flow over a slender cone, Journal of

Space Craft and Rockets, Vol. 31, No. 2, March-April 1994, pp. 215-222.

[5] M. S. Kim, J. M. Loellbach, K. D. Lee, Effect of gas model on hypersonic base flow calculations, Journal

of Spacecraft and Rockets, Vol. 31, No. 2, Mar-Apr, 1994, pp. 223-230.

[6] Hemdan, Hamdi T., Hypersonic flows over slender pointed-nose elliptic cones at zero incidence, Acta

Astronautica, Vol. 45, No. 1, July 1999, pp 1-10.

[7] METALL-SPEZIALROHR GMBH Company, http://www.msr-special.de/produkte.html.

[8] D. R. Eklund, D. G. Fletcher, R.J. Hartfield Jr., G. B. Northam, C. L. Dancey, A Comparative-

Experimental investigation of Mach 2 flow over a rearward-facing step, Computers and Fluids, Vol. 24,

No. 5, 1995, pp 593-608.

[9] NPARC Alliance Validation Archive,

http://www.grc.nasa.gov/WWW/wind/valid/backstep/backstep02/backstep02.html

[10] J. D. Anderson, Jr., Computational Fluid Dynamics-The basis with applications, McGraw-Hill, Inc.,

1995.

[11] Klaus A. Hoffmann and Steve T. Chiang, Computational fluid dynamics for engineers, Engineering

Education System, March 1995.

* Ph.D. Student, Center for Aerospace Research, NCATSU, Greensboro, NC 27411, AIAA Student Member

** Director, Center for Aerospace Research, NCATSU, Greensboro, NC 27411, AIAA Senior Member

9

[12] Anderson, John D., Modern Compressible Flow With Historical Perspective , 2

nd

ed.,1990 McGraw-

Hill Publishing Company, 1995.

[13] NASA Glenn Research Center: www.grc.nasa.gov/www/k-12/airplane/atmosmet.html.

- History of CFD work in IndiaUploaded byjoemonjacob
- Predicting Pressure Distributions Using CFDUploaded bydedysusila
- Unstructured Grid Generation for Aerospace Applications (1999)Uploaded bysrikanth sikhakolli
- viscousUploaded byUluç Yamalı
- Luay S. AlansariUploaded byInternational Energy and Environment Foundation (IEEF)
- 114HaiUploaded byengg_sak
- LOLLIUploaded byRamakrishnaRao Soogoori
- Modeling and Experimental Study of Newtonian Fluid Flow in AnnulusUploaded byEmma MN
- SL-08-005 FinalUploaded bycnsidero
- Assessment of CFD Work in India [Gopal R. Shevare]Uploaded byaeroacademic
- xxUploaded byvivek9199
- chapter 3Uploaded bymegaadji
- Computationa Fluid Dynamics CFD Handouts 2014Uploaded byA P Nyquist Adegbayi
- CFD Application Tutorials 1Uploaded bydzejzi
- Related StudiesUploaded byJohn Darwin Sabio
- STUDY BEGG AND BRILL.pdfUploaded byJuan Pablo
- Consequence ModellingUploaded byvignesh
- Boundary Layer Theory-SCHILSCHTINGUploaded byalabastrino
- Variational Methods for CFD_Alouges & Maury.pdfUploaded byAnderson Miranda Silva
- OTC-23968-MS-P.pdfUploaded byTatiany
- Determination of Minimum Safe Purge Gas Flow Rate in Flare Systems With a Velocity Seal (CTFO)Uploaded byjdgh1986
- air plane aerodynimcsUploaded byAbdelrahman El Rassy
- Numerical_Simulation_of_two_phase_flowUploaded byWanessa Franciele
- 1-s2.0-S1674237015302489-main_2Uploaded byiOScar Ultron
- Differential Analysis of Fluid Motion_part3Uploaded byMark Francis Dela Cruz
- Wind Turbine Blade geometry.pdfUploaded bychandru
- 111CH0600 ThesisUploaded byAntariksha Pattnaik
- CFD Industrial ApproachUploaded byFiroz
- Park.pdfUploaded bySojinnath Vadakkayil
- FLACS CFD Offshore Gas Case StudyUploaded bysushant

- Off Design Flow Phenomena - Air CompressorsUploaded byAndrew Martin
- 14. Airplane GeometryUploaded byShravankumar Nagapuri
- BiomemicsUploaded byAndrew Martin
- Moire TechniqueUploaded byAndrew Martin
- Optimization of Urea SCR DeNOx SystemsUploaded byAndrew Martin
- Thermodynamics Lab ManualUploaded byAndrew Martin
- catalysts-06-00046Uploaded byAndrew Martin
- Urea-SCR System Optimization With Various Combinations of Mixer Types and Decomposition Pipe LengthsUploaded byAndrew Martin
- Performance Evaluation of a Urea-water Selective Catalytic ReductionUploaded byAndrew Martin
- Control of NOx Emissions From Diesel Engine by Scr With UreaUploaded byAndrew Martin
- Diesel Emissions in ReviewUploaded byAndrew Martin
- chevron fuel reportUploaded byAndrew McCann
- AvionicsUploaded byAndrew Martin
- Propulsion 1 Two q & AUploaded byAndrew Martin
- CFD Study on Aircraft WingsUploaded byAndrew Martin
- V5I12-IJERTV5IS120001Uploaded byAndrew Martin
- Numerical Investigation of Flow in an Over-expanded NozzleUploaded byAndrew Martin
- TutorialUploaded bys_c_saha
- Dynamics of Sonic Hydrogen Jet Injection and MixingUploaded byAndrew Martin
- Fundamentals Aerodynamics-JD AndersonUploaded byAndrew Martin
- Aerodynamic Analysis of Dimple Effect on Aircraft WingUploaded byAndrew Martin
- Single Page Me6301 Engineering ThermodynamicsUploaded byManoj Pepi
- G1054048-libreUploaded byAndrew Martin
- Cowl DeflectionUploaded bySrinivasan Gunasekaran
- Experimental Investigation Scramjet Waidmann 2Uploaded byAndrew Martin
- Supersonic Combustion Waidmann 1Uploaded byAndrew Martin
- Hypersonic Airbreathing PropulsionUploaded byAndrew Martin
- Coil Curvature Effect on Heat ExchangerUploaded byAndrew Martin

- Hose Routing TipsUploaded bylink2u_007
- Vaughan_Chapter01_PPT.pptUploaded byAnis Maisarah
- FILEIOUploaded bytidjani73
- Catadiene Class cUploaded byMuhammad Ahmad
- f11 Final v2 SolutionUploaded byEileen Fu
- BCM 7 Example SP3Uploaded byChandra Mohan
- 19 Self Compacting ConcreteUploaded bySrijaJuluru
- SDS - Fenomastic Enamel Matt - English (Uk) - DubaiUploaded byBalasubramanian Ananth
- 04_Matulja_inddUploaded byAhly1970
- MDSW-Meghalaya02Uploaded byminingnova1
- acam+Katalog+2013-05-23Uploaded byअमरेश झा
- Rapid Hybrid Tooling based on CNC- and µEDM-milling to fabricate Lab-on-a-Chip SystemsUploaded bythanhphucphan
- 2017-03437C-01-001_BOM-450Uploaded bysundya
- 39nx-2pdUploaded byWalter J Naspirán Castañeda
- Digital Control of Stepper MotorUploaded bytamimdeen
- compnetwork.MCQsUploaded byAnwerZaib Khan
- 2100_Syllabus_Fall_2017(2)Uploaded byअजय ढकाल
- Jit Production to Reduce Inventory Level-synopsis (1)Uploaded byNageshwar Singh
- Bash GuideUploaded byapi-3833675
- Cloning Release 12 Oracle ApplicationsUploaded bySimon Seruyinda
- Dotnet PDFUploaded byKumarecit
- Ran 2338Uploaded bynish43
- 5NPX1006FUploaded byshuvrosaha
- Presentation on Bernoulli's EquationUploaded byDerek Stampone
- AerodynamicsUploaded bychemamol
- Product SummaryUploaded byabc
- VC.pdfUploaded byMisha Kulibaev
- MainUploaded byYoumna Salah
- r5320101 Geotechnical EngineeringUploaded byIbmWasuser
- MELUploaded bymaddy_i5

## Much more than documents.

Discover everything Scribd has to offer, including books and audiobooks from major publishers.

Cancel anytime.