3 4456 0267513 B

-
I his report wa': prsparzd as an acc,mtn? of w o ~ k sponsored by an 2
l Jni fcdStatesGov~rri fti enI Ncit;lei;heLLn~l~ciStat~~Gnv,,,,,,?ent no
i hskxJf , nor any of the11 ~~: ~$l oyess, maker, aqy warranty express or rrnpli~ri or
assumps aity lcgal liability or r esFox hility for the accilracy, coii-ipL-:rness, or
WPf l Jl n9s of any information, apparstus, product. or process disclosed, or
represents that its i1snivoiAd not infringe private!y owned I ~ghi s Ecfsrence herein
t o any spac:fic csi mmci al product, proc
nanuf xrt urw or oihw*,lcce, d0e.s n9t necessarily constitute or iinply its
endoi semnt re;t.?nnieqidaim, or favuring by thc IJnitwl St?iesGc.rer?ineI:: or
any agency t hcxsf TPe viel;s and opinions of aui ho~s expressed +c:ein do nat
necessarily state or reflect those af thc E lnited StatTs Government or any ? g c x y
thersc:
,r service by trede naxno ?:n
.
ORNL/'M- 99 2 7
D is t r i but ion
Category UC-95d
METALS AND CERAMICS DIVISION
THICKNESSES, DENSITIES, AWD CALCULATED THERMAL RESISTANCES
FOR LOOSE-'FILL ROCK WOOL INSTALLED IN TWO ATTIC SECTIONS
OF A MANUFACTURED HOUSE
R. S. Graves
D. W. Yarbrough
Date Published - February 1986
Prepared for Office of
Buildings and Community Systems
Part of
The National Program for
Building Thermal Envelope Systems and Materials
NOTICE: This document contains informaton of
preliminary nature. It is subject to revision
or correction and therefore does not: represent
a final report.
Prepared by the
OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY
Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831
operated by
for the
under Contract No. DE-AC05-840R21400
MARTIN MARIETTA ENERGY SYSTEMS, I NC.
U*S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
CONTENTS
ABSTRACT . 4 . 1
INTRODUCTION . a e . rn 1
DESCRIPTION OF TEST - 0 . . . 3
BESULTSOFTHE' JXST * . . 0 . . 3
CONCLUSIONS . e 0 rn m . 9
RECOMPlENDATIONS . e e . . rn e 10
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS . 10
REFERENCES e 10
APPENDIX A. SI METRIC EQUIVALENTS OF ENGLISH UNITS USED
INTHISREPORT e 13
APPENDIX B. TEST RESULTS 8 . 15
iii
THICKNESSES, DENSITIES, AND CALCULATED THERMAL RESISTANCES
OF LOOSE-FILL ROCK WOOL INSTALLED IN TWO ATTIC SECTIONS
OF A MANUFACTURED HOUSE*
-
R. S. Graves and D. W. Yarbrough
ABSTRACT
The e f f e c t of vi br at i ons due t o manufacturing and
t r ans por t on t he t hi ckness, dens i t y, and cal cul at ed thermal
resistance (R-value) of l oos e- f i l l rock wool i ns ul a t i on
i n s t a l l e d i n two manufactured home uni t s has been determined.
Thi ckness and dens i t y measurements on blown at t i c I ns ul at i on
were made a f t e r i ns t a l l a t i on, at the end of t he manufacturing
pr ocess, and a f t e r t he uni t s were towed 265 m i l e s . These
measurements were used t o cal cul at e R-values f or t he a t t i c
i ns ul at i on. The end s ect i ons of t he two units showed an
ove r a l l i ns ul at i on t hi ckness decr ease of about 16% and an
aver age R-value change from 31.2 t o 28.8 ft2-h*OF/Btu.
est i mat ed R-value gr e a t e r t han 30 ft**h*OF/Btu r es ul t ed from
aver agi ng t he end and middle s ect i ons of t he two uni t s . The
e f f e c t of reduced t hi ckness al ong t he edges of t he at t i c space
w a s not i ncl uded In the estimate.
An
INTRODUCTION
The t hermal r es i s t ance of a l oos e - f i l l t hermal i ns ul at i on
i n s t a l l e d i n an a t t i c depends on t hi ckness and dens i t y f or a specLf i c
t ype of f i be r . A test method f or pr edi ct i ng t he s e t t l e d dens i t y of
l oos e - f i l l c e l l ul os i c i ns ul at t on has been i n use f or s ever al year s, ' and
e f f o r t s have been under way t o c ol l e c t dat a t ha t def i ne t he ext ent of
s e t t l i n g of l oos e - f i l l mi ner al f i be r product s i n Thickness
and dens i t y measurements are used t o quant l f y s e t t l i n g , but thermal
r e s i s t a nc e (R-value) is t he most i mport ant pr oper t y and must be con-
s i der ed. Fi el d examination of l oos e - f i l l at t i c i ns ul a t i on i nvol ves
long-term moni t ori ng oE mat er i al s i ns t a l l e d i n accordance wi t h l abel
*Research sponsored by t he Of f i ce of Bui l di ngs and Community
Systems, U.S. Department of Energy, under cont r act DE-ACOS-840R21400
wi t h Martin Marietta Energy Systems, Inc.
1
2
s peci f i cat i ons and amounts-
materials, such as l oos e - f i l l f i be r gl a s s at de ns i t i e s above 1.0 l b / f t 3
or loose-f ill rock wool above 2 . 9 I b/ f t 3, has been negl i gi bl e.
Observed s e t t l i n g of above-l abel -densi t y
[Note: Although t he pol i cy of t he Oak Ridge Nat fonal Laborat ory is
t o r epor t its work i n SI metric uni t s , t h i s r epor t uses Engl i sh uni t s .
The j us t i Ei cnt l on f or dnIng so i s t ha t t he U.S. i asrxl at i on i ndust r y a t
pr esent oper at es e nt i r e l y wl t h Engl i sh uni t s , so use of the ST uni t s
would l hi t t he usef ul ness of t h i s r epor t for Lhe primary r eader shi p.
The SI equi val ent s of uni t s used i n t h i s r epor t are l i s t e d i n AppendPx A. ]
The manufactured 'mousing i ndust r y is provi di ng an i ncr easi ng per-
cent age of new houses, and avai l abl e dat a on t he behavior of insulation
i n t he i r s t r uc t ur e s ar e scarce. The st udy r epor t ed her e w a s undertaken
t o add t o t he dat a avai l ahl c f or a t t i c i ns ul at i on i n manufactured
houses 0
5
A l i mf t ed st udy o f t he pot ent i al set t l ement of i ns ul at i on blown
i nt o at t i cs i n manufactured houses was undertaken I n cooper at i on wi t h
American Rockwool, Inc. ,* and Mascot Homes, 1ne.T Mascot Homes bui l ds
s i ngl e- and double-wfde houses i n a mnuEact ur i ng pl ant , and t he manu-
f act ur ed untts are t hen highway t r anspor t ed to buyers -
Mascot Homes u t i l i z e s American Rockwool blowing wool product , and
t hey adver t l s e an R-value of 30 ( f t 2*hoDP/ Bt u) i n t he at t i cs of t he i r
manufactured houses. This i ns ul at f on is used as one f eat ur e t o f i at f sf y
t h e heat t r ansmi ssi on r es i s t ance requi rement s re1at. d t o manufactured
housing. The Informat i on on t he American Rockwool l a be l i ndi cat es t hat
t he mat er i al should be i ns t a l l e d a t a density of 1.7 l b / f t 3 .
dens f t y an I ns ul at i on t hl ckness of 9.71 i n. fs s pe c t f t e d f or R-30.
A t t h i s
Normally, t he number of bags of i ns ul at i on bl mn i n t o an a t t i c i s
cal cul at ed on t he bas i s of t he area of the at t i c. The obj ect i ve of t he
t es t r epor t ed here was to determine t he ext ent oE settling of the blawn-
i n i ns ul at i on I n t he attics of two uni t s (1) af t er wltrxessing t he
i n s t a l l a t i o n a t 1.7 l b / f t 3 dens i t y, ( 2) a f t e r completion of t he manufac-
turing pr ocess, and ( 3) af t er t he uni t s had been towed t o t he buyer.
*American Rockwaol, Inc., Spri ng Hope Di vi si on, P.O. Box 880,
tMascot Homes, Inc., P.O. Box 127, Gramling, SC! 29348,
Spr i ng Rope, NC 27882.
3
DESCRIPTION OF THE TEST
.
The t est house consi st ed of two uni t s i dent i i ed by Ser i al
Numbers 21258 and B. Each uni t w a s 64.1 f t l ong and 11.8 f t wide. The
t o t a l at t i c area w a s 756 f t 2 , and t he i ns ul at i on l a be l showed t h a t 36
twenty-nine-pound bags of i ns ul at i on per uni t would be r equi r ed f or an
R-30 i ns t a l l a t i on. There we r e 49 t r us s e s t ha t formed 48 bays i n each
a t t i c (Fi g. 1). The t r us s e s were numbered from 1 t o 49 s t a r t i n g from
t h e f r ont of t he s t r uct ur e. Only seven bays a t t he f r ont and el even
bays a t t he rear coul d be examined at t he end of t he t est because of t he
way t he at t i c is encl osed. Those acces s i bl e a t t i c areas were desi gnat ed
a s t he primary test sites. Wooden r ul e r s 18 i n. long were at t ached
t o t r us s e s as shown in Fi g. l ( h ) t o measure t he dept h of Lnsul at i on at
t he t i m e of i ns t a l l a t i on and l a t e r .
The i ns ul a t i on wa s blown i n t o t he at t f cs on August 15, 1985, wi t h a
KSI Model 1230 machine. The machine wa s equipped wi t h 130 f t of
Ir-in.-diam hose. The gat e and a i r s e t t i ngs were made by t he American
Rockwool area manager (T. Hinson) t o ensure i n s t a l l a t i o n t ha t wa s con-
s i s t e n t wi t h t he product l abel . As a pr el i mi nar y t est o f machine set-
t i n g s approximately one bag of i ns ul at i on w a s blown i nt o a boxed-in area
i n t he pl ant , and two dens i t y det er mi nat i ons were made wi t h a cyl i ndr i -
cal c ut t e r . Anal ysi s of i n- s i t u l oos e- f i l l i ns ul at i on dens i t y dat a
i ndi c a t e s t ha t t he average measured dens i t y of 1.56 l b / f t 3 was s a t i s f a c -
t or y f or t he test. A t t i c appl i cat i on wa s done by t he Mascot Homes crew
wi t h t he except i on oE one-t hi rd of uni t A in which t he i ns ul at i on was
i n s t a l l e d by Mr . Hinson. Thi rt y-seven bags of i ns ul at i on we r e i ns t a l l e d
in each uni t on t he bas i s of nomfnal dimensions of 64 f t by 12 f t . I n
addi t i on t o t he a t t i c i ns ul at i on, two 2-ft by 2- f t boxes, each wi t h an
at t ached r ul e r , were f i l l e d t o a dept h of approximately 12 in. wi t h t he
same product . One box wa s placed insCde each uni t t o det ermi ne i f f l oor
vi br a t i on would produce s e t t l i n g di f f e r e nt from t ha t i n t he at t i cs .
RESULTS OF' THE TEST
Af t e r t he i ns ul a t i on w a s i ns t a l l e d, manila f i l e f ol der s wi t h cen-
t e r e d s l ot s were s l i pped over t he seven r ul e r s i n the acces s i bl e regions
ORNL-DWG 85-45654R
TRUSS NUMBERS
I
....... . ... .. . ..
.- - 64 .- f+- in.
NOTES:
0. WHEELS ARE BETWEEN TRUSSES 28 AND 34
b. HATCHED AREAS ARE PRIMARY TEST ZONES
ORNL-DWG 85-1565SR
FOR LIFTING
i4ft-40in.
( I N S U LATA 8 LE R EG I 0 N )
i f t-0in.
(OVERHANG)
FI
Fig. 1. Diagram showing accessible pa r t of at t i c. ( a ) Top view.
( h ) End view,
5
.
in each unit. The purpose of the folders was to provide a thickness
average over an area and to define the ruler reading.
densty determinations were made with a cylindrical cutter. These were
along the length of the unit, but only three were in the primary test
areas shown in Pigs. 1 and 2. The three i n the test areas averaged
1.64 lb/ft3, which was very close to the label density of 1.7 lb/ft3.
The two densities in the center area were 2.08 and 2.56 lb/t3.
average thickness of 10.17 in. was derived from 22 end-section thickness
measurements. The average density in the end sections of unit A as
determined with a cylindrical cutter was 1.77 lb/ft3 at an average
thickness of 10. 04 in., and the middle sectfon had an average density of
2. 49 lb/ft3 at an average thickness of 10.38 in.
were used to calculate the R-values corresponding to the insulation den-
sity and thickness measurements in the end sections and middle sections of
the two test units.
In unit B five
An
Equations (1) and ( 2 )
R-value = thickness (in.)/apparent thermal conductivity (k,) (1)
k, = 0.0524 t- 0 . 0 2 4 6 ~ -+ 0.3906/p
(2 1
Equation (2) was obtaiaed from published data or loose-fill rock
wool. insulation2 and gives ka in Btu* in. / f t2 *he "F at a mean temperature
of 75F with density, p , in lb/ft3. The third term in the equation was
adjusted to match American Kockwool's label information. Calculated end-
section R-values as Installed were 31.7 and 30.7 ft2*h-"P/Btu for units
A and B , respectively. All results from tests of units A and B are given
in Appendix B and summarized i n Tables 1 and 2.
The manufacturing steps that follow the attic insulation installa-
tion induce considerable vibration in the structure. Consequently, the
thicknesses indicated by the in-situ rulers in the accessible end sec-
tions were observed at the end of manufacturing, and additional
thickness measurements were made with probes as shown in Appendix B.
Equaton (3) was used to calculate the density, p2, after a change in
thickness to 62, giving the information needed for the calculation of
R-value.
6

T
-

(
0

I

'
-
l
a

T
-

,
-
.
I
?

I

I

I

3
1
:
:

O
I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

1
,

1

-
&

I

-
I

I

-
2

p

L
o

I

K

I

-
g
.

M

w
3
1
1

+

H

Table 1. Density and thickness measurements
Thickness at end Thickness at
Initial density Initial thickness of manufacturing destination
(in.) (inb>
(lb/ft3) (in. 1
Location
Unit A
End section 1.77 10 e 0 4 9.31 8.35
Mid section 2.49 10 e38
Unit 3
End section 1.64 10.17 9.47 8.55
Mid section . 2.32 10 -37
-4
Table 2. Calculated thermal resistances
Change in
R-value
Initial value At end of manufacturing At de s t ina t ion
(f t2.h* 'F/Btu) ( f t *h* "F/Btu)
( 2)
( f t 2*h*oF/Btu)
Location
Unit A
End section 31.7 30 *6 29 .O -8.5
-12.2 Mid section 38.4 33.7a
Unit B
End section 30.7 29 .a 28.4 -7.5
Mid section 37.3 33.3a -10.7
'Calculated by using percent decrease in thickness from end sections.
Six end-section rulers remained in place --I un t B at completion of
construction, and seven end-section rulers remained in place in unlt A.
The average end-section thickness in unit A was 9.31 in., and the
average end-section thickness in unit B was 9.47 in. The end-section
R-values corresponding to the end-of --manufacture thicknesses are 30.6 and
29. 8 ft2=heoF/Btu f or units A and 3 , respectbvely.
The file folder at one location showed iin indentation at the end of
manufacturing, so the folders were removed t o prevent compression due to
folder movement. The insulation thicknesses determined in the end sec-
tions after removal of the folders represent a starting point for eval-
uating the effect of transport. The two units were towed from
Gramling, S . C . , to Princeton, W. Va., by Mascot Home drivers following
normal delivery procedure. The units werc Lowed 265 miles in 5 h for an
average speed of 53 mph.
Thicknesses in the accessible end sections of both units were
determined after the 265-mile trip. Unit A end-section thfcknesses
averaged 8.35 in. f or an R-value of 29.0 ft2sheoP/Utu, and unit U end-
section thicknesses averaged 8. 55 in. f or an R-value of 28.5
ft2*h*'P/Btu.
believed to provide a severe test because movement results from wheel
QibratiOns and flexing of the structure.
The end sections of the mnuFact ured units are
The insulation in bows on the floors of the two untts showed
little settlement. The boxes in units A and B were positioned 6 and
20 ft, respectively, from the hitch endl Average inital insulation
thicknesses determined by 10 probes and a fixed ruler I n each box were
12. 56 in. and 14. 21 in. in units A and B, respectively. Similarly
determined thicknesses in un-lts A and B after transport were 12.15 in.
and 14. 04 in., respectively. A measurement at the end of the test
showed that the insulation i n the boxes wa s at a density of about
2.5 I b / f t 3 .
9
The measurements completed after installation, end of construction,
and after transport are summarized in Table 1 along with initial den-
sities. Calculated R-values for the three examinations are listed i n
Table 2. The results in Tables 1 and 2 show that there was a 16%
decrease in the thickness of insulation in the test sections. The calcu-
lated decrease in R-value in the test sections was 8%. The higher-
density material in the unit mid sections should be less affected by
~ibration,~ and this was demonstrated by the boxed materials.
however, mid-section R-values are reduced by the values derived for the
ends and an overall R-value is obtained by averaging the end val ues and
mid-sectlon values, then unit A has a final val ue of 31.4 ft2*habF/Btu and
unit B has a final value of 30.9 ft2.ho0F/Btu. These averages are for
the central region of the structure and do not Lnclude corrections for
tapering of the Insulation near the edges.
If,
CONCZUSIONS
This test was limited to observations on two manufactured units
with most of the measurements being made in the end sections. The
thickness of the rock wool in the end sections decreased by about 16%
between installation and delivery. Calculated thermal resistances in
the end sections, however, decreased by about 8% after adjustments were
made for tncreased density. The calculated R-values of the mid sections
of the unlts were initially greater than end-section R-values because of
higher density and greater thickness. Final R-values for the mid sec-
tions were calculated on the assumption that settling of the high-
density insulation would not exceed that of the lower-density
end-section insulation. Equal weighing of calculated end-section and
mid-section R-values resulted in an average destination value exceeding
30 ft2*heoF/%tu near the high point t n the attic.
10
RE COWANDAT IONS
The r e s ul t s of t h i s study i ndi cat e a need f or addi t i onal dat a on
thermal r e s i s t a nc e s pr esent i n mnufaetured housing uni t s a f t e r
t r ans por t t o t he consumer. The dat a base f or l oos e- f f l l i ns ul at i ons I n
a t t i c appl i cat i ons should be expanded t o i ncl ude a l l candi dat e materials
i n s t a l l e d t o provi de r epr es ent at i ve R-values. Fut ur e measurement pl ans
shoul d i ncl ude pr ovi si ons f or repeat ed dens i t y and t hi ckness measure-
ments throughout t he at t i c. Computer si mul at i ons and addi t i onal . Fi el d
da t a could provi de thermal performance pr edi ct i ons f or i ns ul at i ons
i n s t a l l e d at di f f e r e nt t hi cknesses and de ns i t i e s because of t he some-
t i m e s l i mi t ed a t t i c space.
ACKNOWLEDCMENTS
The aut hor s extend thanks t o R. A. Sul l i van and T. Hinson of
Amer-i can Rockwool, Tnc., f or coor di nat i ng t h i s a t t i c i ns ul a t i on
t es t program and t o R. t. Camp, Jr., of Mascot Homes, I nc. , for par-
t i c i pa t i ng i n t he tests, The r epor t pr of i t t e d from reviews by
D. L. McElroy, T. S. Lundy, S. L. Matthews, and W. Gerken. The
suggest i ons of t he reviewers and t he work done by Brenda Hickey,
Sher r y Samples, and Carolyn Whitus t o prepare t he d r a f t a r e acknowledged
and appr eci at ed. 0. A. Nelson edi t ed t he d r a f t , and A. R. McDonald
prepared t he manuscript f or publ i cat i on.
REFERENCES
1. Federal Speci f i cat i on, Insul at i on Thezwal (Loose-Fill for
Pneumt i c or Poured AppZi cat i on) : Cel l ut osi c or Wood Fiber, Spect f i cat i on
GSA HH-I-515D.
2. D. 1,. McElroy, D. W. Yarbrough, and R. S . Graves, "The Thickness
and Density of Loose-Fill I ns ul at i ons Af t er I n s t a l l a t i o n i n Res i dent t al
At t i cs, " i n proceedings of DBEIASTM Conference, Dal l as, Dee. 2-6, 1984,
Ame r i c a n Soci et y f or Test i ng and Materials, Phi l adel phi a, i n pr ess.
11
3. D. W. Yarbrough, J. H. Wright, D. L. McElroy, and T. F. Seanlan,
"Settling of Loose-Fill Tnsulations Due to Vibration," pp. 703-74 in
Ther ml I nsul at i on, Mat egal s and Systems f or Energy Conservation in t he
M US, ASTM STP 789, F. A. Govan, D. M. Greason, and J. D. McAllister,
eds., Amer-Lcan Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, 1983.
4. D. L. McElroy, D. W. Yarbrough, and R. S. Graves, "'An In-Situ
Study of Attc Loose-Fill Thermal Insulation in Residential Applications,"
pp. 34357 in Ther ml Performance of thc? Exterior Envelopes of Buildings 11,
ASHRAE SP-38, American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and
Air-conditioning Engineers, Inc., New York, 1983.
5. An I nvest i gat i on of Set t l i ng of Blown Rockwool Insulation, Test
Report RAD-319, RADCO, Carson, Calif., 1982.
13
Appendix A
SI METRIC EQUIVALENTS OF mJGLISH UNITS USED IN THIS REPORT
Property English unit SI equivalent
Dimens ion
Dimension
Density
Thermal conductivity
Thermal resistance
Temperature
Temperature difference
D is tance
in.
ft
l b/ f t3
Btu in. / f t Oh* O F
ft2.hD0F/Btu
OF
OF
mi le
25.4 m
0.3048 m
16 -02 kg/m3
0.144 W/m K
0.1762 K m2/W
O C = (5/9)("F -
"C = (5/9)OF
1.6 km
15
Appendix B
TEST RESULTS
Table B . l . Density (lb/ft3) and thickness (in.) measurements
for unit A
Loca t iona Ini t i al At end of manufacture At destination
I -- -I_
Density (thickness)
3-4 1.863 (10.33)
9-10 1.614 ( 9. 12)
39-40 1.742 (9.41)
45-46 1.866 ( 11. 02)
16-17 2.578 (9.83)
2 4-2 5 2.333 (11.21)
3 2-33 2.571 (10.09)
3- 4
5-6
39-40
44- 46
3
5
7
9
41
44
47
9.06
10 .oo
10 -00
10.56
10.25
10.62
11.06
Thickness w i t h probes
8.02
8.76
10.62
9.68
Thickness with rulers
8.50
8.75
9 .OO
10 .oo
9 e25
10.25
10.25
7.32
7.85
9.50
8.68
8 .OO
7.25
8 .OO
9.58
8.12
9 ,oo
8.75
~~
aSee Fig. 1 for truss numbering system.
hhickness values are the average of five measurements.
16
Table B. 2. Density ( l b / f t 3 ) and thickness (in.) measurements
for unit B
Locationa InitPal At end of manufacture At destinatfon
3-4
4 3 4 4
4%6
1 7-1 8
3 2-3 3
2- 4
6-7
39-40
4 8-4 9
2
4
6
8
37
41
46
Density (thickness)
1. 560 ( 8. 86)
1.644 ( 9. 20)
1.726 (12.59)
2.077 (10.24)
2. 563 (10.50)
10 .oo
9.69
10.56
10.62
9.94
9.31
10.38
Thickness wi t h probesb
8. 64
9. 83
10. 33
10. 16
Thickness with rulers
7 .SO
8.75
9.50
c
8.50
8 - 62
8.50
8.27
8. 92
9.24
8 e68
7 .OO
a 2 5
8.88
7.88
7.38
7.38
QSee Fig. 1 f or truss numbering system.
bThickness values are t he average of five measurements.
'Ruler wa s damaged.
17
ORNL/TM-992?
Distribution
Category UC-9%
INTERNAL DISTRIBUTION
1-2. Central Research Library 29-38. M e C . Matthews
4 3 . Laboratory Records Department 40, H. McLain
3. Document Reference Section 39. D. L. McElroy
6 . Laboratory Records, ORNL RC 41. J . W. Michel
7. ORNL Patent Section 42. W. B. Mixon
8 . R. W. Barnes
9 . E. E. Bloom
10. R. S. Carlsmith
11. J. A. Carpenter
12. K. W. Childs
13. 3. E. Christian
14. G. E. Courvifle
15. W. Fulkerson
16-25. R. S . Graves
26. W. R. Huntley
27. M. A. Karnitz
28. T. S. Lundy
43.
44
45.
46-48.
49.
50-59.
60.
61.
62.
63.
64.
65.
M. 6J. Rosenthal
A. C. Schaffhauser
J. 0. Stiegler
Pe T. Thornton
T. 3. Wilbanks
D. W. Yarbrough
R. J. Charles (Consultant)
G. Y. Chin (Consultant)
H. E. Cook (Consultant)
Alan Lawley (Consultant)
WI De Nix (Consultant)
J. C. Williams (Consultant)
EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTION
66 e
6 7 .
6 8 .
69.
70.
71.
72.
73.
74.
75.
?6
77.
78.
79.
P. R. Achenbach, 1322 Kurtz Road, McLean, VA 22101
R. L. Alumbaugh, Code L52 Naval Civil Engineering Laboratory,
Port Hueneme, CA 93043
R. W. Anderson, 7090 Tecumseh Lane, Chanhassen, MN 55317
F. Arumi-Noe, School Of Architecture, University of Texas,
Austin, TX 78712
G. L. Askew, Tennessee Valley Authority, 2551 D Signal Place,
1101 Market Street, Chattanooga, TN 37402-2801
E. L. Bales, School oArchitecture, Mew Jersey Institute af
Technology, Newark, NJ 07102
C. GI Bankvall, Associate Professor, Swedish National Testtng
Institute, P.O. Box 857 S-501, Boras, Sweden
G. B. Barney, Portland Cement Association, Constructfan Technology
Laboratory, 5420 Old Orchard Road, Skokie, TL 60077
J. M. Barnhart, Thermal Insulation Manufacturers Association,
7 Kirby Plaza, P.O. Box 686, Mount Kisco, NY 10549
J. R. Blasius, No-Tox Products, Inc., P.O. Box 6532,
50 North 41st Avenue, Phoenix, AZ 85009
M. Bomberg, National Research Council of Canada, Building M-24,
Montreal Road, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1A OR6
B. Bromley, American Rockwool, Inc., P.Q. Box 880,
Spring Hope, NC 27882
W. C. Brawn, National Research Council of Canada, Division of
Building Research, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada R1A OR6
R. D. Busch, AREA Inc, Union Square, 111 Gold Avenue, SE,
Albuquerque, NM 87102
18
80
81
82.
8 3 .
$5.
86
87.
88.
89
90.
91.
92.
93.
94.
95.
95.
97.
98.
99.
100.
101.
102 *
103.
104.
105.
106.
H. W. Busching, 214 Lmr y Hall, Department of CLvil Engineering,
Cl emson Unlversity, Clemssn, SC 29631
J . H. Cable, John Cable Associates, Inc., ArchPtects and
Planners, 510 Foiitaine Street, Alexandria, VA 22302
S. H. Cady, ExecuZ-ve Vice Pri ?stdent, Mineral Insulation
Manufactonrers Association, 382 Springfield Avenue, Summit, NJ 07901
T. J. Cardenas, Steven Winter AssocLates, 6100 EmpPrc St at e Building,
New York, NY l 0FQl
W. Carroll, Lawrence Berkeley tahoratory, Building 90, Room 2056,
Berkeley, CA 94320
P. Cleary, Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, Building 90-3074,
Berkeley, CA 94720
M. T. Cohen, Consumer Product Saf et y Commisson, 5401 Westbard Ave.,
Washington, DC 20207
A. R. Coleman, Tennessee Valley Authority, 1101. Market Street,
Chattanooga, TN 77402-2801
G. Coleman, ACEC Research & Mnagernent Foi mdat i an,
1015 1 5 t h St r eet , Nw, Suite 802, Vashington, DC 20005
R. Davis, 3073 Willoughby Road, Mason, MI 48854
B. J . Dempsey, Cfvil Engineering Laboratory, 1205 New Nark,
208 N. Romine, Urbana, IL 61801
M. W. Di zenfePd, P.E., Of f l ce of Public Rousing, Department of
Housing and Urban Development, 451 7th Street SW,
Washington, DC 20410-5000
D. Dorius, U. S. House of Representatives, Subeonnrnhttee of HousIng
and Community Development of t he Committee on Banking, Finance
and Urban Mfairs, Ninety-2ighth Congress , 2128 Rayburn House
Office Building, Washington, DC 20515
J. G. Drlggans, Tennessee Valley Authority, 2355 D. Signal Place,
Chattanooga, TN 37402-280'1
R. S. Dougall, University of Pittsburgh, Department of
Meehanlcal Englneering, Pittsburgh, PA 15261
W. P. EZ14_s, Standards Consultant, 754 Bob-Bea Lane,
Harleysville, PA 19438
D. M. Evans, Jr., Steven lJintrar Associates, Inc., 6100 Empire State
Building, New York, NY 10001
P. TJ. Fairey 111, Florlda Solar Energy Center, 300 State Road 401,
Cape Canaueral, FT, 32920
J. Pandey, Consumer Products Safety Co mmi s s i o n , Room 760, IWB,
Washtngton, DC 20207
I. A. Fine, 949 Wishbone Circle, Zexington, KY 40502
D. M. Firman, Ileadquarters, A i r Force Engineering and Services
Cent er , HQ AFES@/Z)EM, Tyndall AFB, FI, 32403
14. E. Pitch, P.E., Southwest Certification Services Inc. , 6800
Alarno Downs P a r h a y , San Antonio, TX 78238
R. R. Gerace, W. R. Grace Ca., 62 Whittennore, Cambridge, MA 02140
C. F. Gilbo, JournaJ. of Thermal Insulation, 201 East Ross Street,
Lamast er , PA 17602
G. G i l l e t C e ? American Institute of Architects Foundation,
1735 New York Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20006
B. F. Gilmartin, Government Marketing, Owens-Corning Fiberglas,
900 17th St. NW, Washington, DC 20006
L. R. Glicksmaim, Massachusetts TnstPtute of Technology,
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Room 3 1 6 4 ,
Cambridge, MA 02139
19
107
108
109.
110.
111.
112.
113.
114.
115.
116.
117.
1.18.
119.
120.
121.
122.
123.
124.
125.
126.
127 e
128 *
129 .)
130.
131.
132.
133.
134.
13s.
R. D. Godfrey, Owens-Corning Fiberglas, Technical Center,
P.O. Box 415, Granville, OH 43023
W. P. Goss, Mechanical Engineering Department, University of
Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003
F. A. Govan, ZBA, Inc., 23 East 7th St., Cincinnatf, OH 45202
A. Greenberg, 24 Mercer Road, Murray Hfll, NJ 07974
E. I. Griggs, Tennessee Technological University, Department of
Mechanical Engineering, Box 5014, Cookeville, TN 38505
R. A. Grot, National Bureau of Standards, Building 226, Room B114,
Gaithersburg, M3 20899
C. Guilford, 20427 73rd Court, NE, Bothell, WA 98011
P. Guttmann, U. S. Borax and Chemical, 3075 Wilshire Alvd.,
Los Angeles, CA 90010
D. Harris, National Institute of Building Sciences,
1015 15th Street, NW, Washington, DC 20005
D. T. Harrje, 24 Autumn HFll Road, Princeton, W 08540
R. Hauser, Nauser Laboratories, P.O. Box G, Boulder, CO 80306
J . L. Heldenbrand, National Bureau o Standards, Building 226,
Room A313, Gaithersubrg, laiD 20899
14. C. Hltchings, National Forest Products Association,
1619 Massachusetts Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20036
B. Hward, National Concrete Masonry Association, P.O. Box 781,
Herndon, VA 22070
K. C. Huwerton, Federal Trade Commission, 6th and Pennsylvania
Avenue, NW, (425 Bicentennial), Washington, DC 20580
.J. R. Hughes, Sol ar Age, Solar Viston, Inc., Harrisville, NH 03450
J. G. Hust, Chemical Engineering Science Division, National
Engineering Laboratory, National Bureau of Standards,
Boulder, C0 80303
C. W. .Jennings, P.E., Tennessee Valley Authority, 3S46D-C Signal
Place, 1101 Market Street, Chattanooga, TN 37402-2801
J. F. Klmpflen, CertainTeed Corporation, P.Q. Box 860,
Valley Forge, PA 19482
W. Kleinfelder, Underwriters Laboratories, Inc., 333 Pfingstan Road,
Northbrook, IT, 50062
P. G. Klernens, University of Connecticut, Box U-45, Storrs, CT 06268
J. Klems, Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, Building 90, Room 3111,
Berkeley, CA 94720
K. E. Kneidel, Babcock & Wilcox Company, Research and Development
Division, 1562 Beeson Street, Alliance, OW 44601
C. J. Korhonen, U.S. Army Cold Regions Research and Engineering
Laboratory, 72 Lyme Road, Hanover, NN 03755
W. M. Kroner, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Center for
Architectural Research, Troy, NY 12181
F. Kubovich, Electra Manufacturing Corporation, 1133 S . McCord Road,
Holland, OH 43528
R. A. LaCosse, National RoofIng Contractars Association,
5600 Bryn Mawr Avenue, Chicago, IT, 60631
A. Lannus, Residentla1 & Commercial Program, ECUT/EMU,
Electric Power Research Institute, PIQ. Box 10412,
Palo Alto, CA 94303
D. C. Larson, Department of Physics and AtmospherSc Sclence,
Drexel University, 32nd and Chestnut Streets,
Philadelphia, PA 19104
20
136
137.
138.
139.
140 D
141.
142.
143.
144.
145"
146.
147.
1 !E8 o
149.
150.
151.
152.
153.
154
155.
156.
157.
1.58.
159.
160.
161.
162"
163.
164 e
E. Leger, P.O. Box 409, New Ipswich, NH 03071
R. Leuthold, Fiber-Chem, Xnc., BOK 448, Bucyrus, QH 44820
W. Linander, EURPMA, Association Sans But Lucrat Lf, Algade H,
DK-4000, Roskilde, Deninark
J . Li nd/ B. Nelson, Minnesota Faepa~tment of Energy and Economic
Development, 900 American Center Building, 150 east Kellogg
Boulevard, St. Paul, MN 55101
G. W. Lou, Engineered Norwoven SCructures Division, E. I. Du Pont
De Nernours i CO., X k l c . , Textile Fibers Department,
0I.d Hickory, TN 37138
M. D. Lyberg, SIB Box 785, Gawk, Sweden
B. R. Marien, Headquarters, A i r Force Engineering & Services
Center, HQ .UES/D Tyndall. AFB, FX 32403
I?. C. Martin, Yanville Service Corporation, Research and
Development Center, P.O. Box 5108, Denver, CO 80217
S . L. Ma t t h e ws , 701 Cr eet a Road, Colorado Springs, CO 80906
G. A. Matzkanin, Somt . hest Kesearch Institute, 9.0. Drawer 28510,
San Antonio, TX 78284
R. McCluney, Florida Sol ar Energy Center, 300 State Road 401,
Cape CanaueraP, FE 32920
R. E. MCCOTIP~QIIS, Association of Collegiate Schools of
Architecture, 1735 New York Avenue, Nld, Washington, DG 20006
J. McCorkle, 6720 S. Steele Street, Lj - t t l e t on, CO 80122
D. R. McCullough, Urethane Foam Contractors Association,
4302 Airporr Boulevard, Austin, TX 78722-1099
D. MeGufre, Regal Industries, Route 1, Box 4 6 ,
Crothersville, IN 47229
P . E. McNall, National Bureau of Standards, Building 226, Room E226
Gaithersburg, )ID 20899
K. Mentzer, MIMA, 382 Springfield Auenue, Summit, NJ 07901
R. Milanese, Perlite Institute, 6268 Jerfcho Turnpike,
Commack, NY 11725
G . Miller, . Jim Wa-hter Research Corp., 10301 9th Street, N,
St. Petersburg, FL 33702
M. Millspnugh, Reflectix, Ine., P.O. Box 108,
Markeville, IN 46056
M. Milne, Graduate School o f Architecture and Urban Planning,
UCLA, Lor; Angelhes, CA 9002lr
M. P. Modera, Lawrence Rerkt.?ley Laboratory, Building 90, Room 3074,
Berkeley, CA 94720
E.. M~hler, University of Pennsylvania, The Graduate School of Fine
Arts, 102 Meyerson Mall CJ, Philadelphia, PA 19104
13. E. Morgenroth, 27880 Wliice Road, Perrysburg, OH 43551
P. Mullins, Tennessee Valley Authority, Box 99,
Jackson, TN 38301
P. G. Mulrone.y, VVKR, Enc., 901 North Pitt Sc. ,
Alexandria, VA 22314
E. Ncwman, Pi-Foil Company, I ne. , 1620 12th Avenue, W,
Great Falls, MT 59401
J. Ohi, Solar Energy Research Institute, 1617 Cole Boulevard,
Golden, CO 80401
T. 9. OhlemP1Ler, National Bureau of Standards, Center for Fire
Research, Gaithersburg, 20899
21
165.
166.
167.
168
169.
170.
171.
172
173.
174
175
176.
177.
178.
179.
180.
181.
182.
183.
184.
185.
186.
187 e
188.
189.
190.
191.
192
C. M. Pelanne, 4900 Pinyon Drive, Littleton, CO 80123
L. Peterson, Technical Services, Division of Thermoguard
Insulation Company, 1040 Andover Park West, Seattle, WA 98188
F. J. Powell, National Bureau of Standards, Bullding 226,
Room B218, Gaithersburg, MD 20899
P. Rains, Residential Technical Program Administrator,
444 Metroplex Drive, P.O. Box 110140, Nashville, TN 37222-0140
M. Reitz, New England Builder, P.O. Box 278, Montpelier, VT 05602
3. Rennex, National Bureau of Standards, Building 226, Room B114,
Gaithersburg, MD 20899
D. Robertson, Energy R&D Information Center, Suite M,
457 Washington, SE, Albuquerque, NM 87108
J. M. Xoehm, Jack M. Roehm & Associates, P.O. Box $87,
Virginia Beach, VA 23451
W. J. Rosslter, Jr., Building Materials Division, Center for Building
Technology, National Bureau of Standards, National Engineering
Laboratory, Gaithersburg, MD 20899
M. W. Rupp, DSET Laboratories, Inc., Box 1850, Black Canyon
Stage 1, Phoenix, AZ $5029
J. Samos, NASA Eangley Research Center, Mail Stop 139A,
Hampton, VA 23665
E. Schaffer, PFS, 2402 Daniels Street, Madison, WI 53716
T. R. Schneider, Energy Utilization, Conservation and Technology
Department, Electric Power Research InstPtute, P.O. Box 10412,
Palo Alto, CA 94303
R. C. Schroter, Product Technical Service Assoclates,
120 Village Square, Suite 121, Orinda, CA 94563
M. Schuetz, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Mass. Avenue,
Room 7-038B, Cambridge, MA 02139
W. W. Seaton, ASHRAE, 1791 Tullie Circle, NE, Atlanta, GA 30329
S. Selkowitz, Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, Building 90,
Room 3111, Berkeley, CA 94720
M. Sherman, J i m Walter Corporation, 10301 9th Street North,
St. Petersburg, FL 33702
P. H. Shipp, Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corporaton, Technical
Center, Building 20-3, Granville, OH 43023
C. J. Shirtliffe, Building R-105, UPFI Unit, National Research
Council of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1A OR6
T. T. Shishman, Area, Inc. , Union Square, 111 Gold Avenue, SE,
Albuquerque, NM 87102
H. S. Smith, Cellin Manufacturing Tnc., P.O. Box 224,
9610 Gunston Cove Road, Lorton, VA 22079
S. E. Smith, Dynatech R/D Company, 99 Erie Street,
Cambridge, MA 02139
M. R. Snyder, Butler Mfg. Go. Research Center, 135th and
Botts Road, Grandview, MO 64030
L. G . Spielvogel, Wyncote House, Wyncote, PA 19095-1499
K. Spittle, Spittle Industries, Inc., P.O. Box 828,
Belmot, FJC 28012
E. Stamper, New Jersey Instftute of Technology, 323 High Street,
Newark, NJ 07102
R. Sterling, University of Minnesota, Underground Space Center,
790 Civil and Mineral Engineering Building, 500 Pillsbury Drive, SE,
Minneapolis, MI 55455
22
193.
194.
195
196.
197.
198.
199.
200.
201.
202.
203
204
205.
206.
207.
208.
209.
210.
211.
212-
224 e
225-
226.
R. Sullivan, American Rockwool, Inc., SprPng Hope, NC 27882
C. L. Tien, Department of Mechanical Engineering, UnPversity of
California, Berkeley, CA 94720
T. W. Tong, Department O E Mechanical and Aerospace Kngfneering,
Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287
H. R. Trechsel, H. R. Trechsel Association, P.O. Box 211,
Germantown, EEI 20874
It. L. Trsyer, Manvllle Service Corporation, Research & Development
Center, Ken-Caryl Ranch, Denver, CO 80217
G. A. Tsongas, Pfechamical Engineering Department, Portland State
University, P.O. Box 751, Portland, OR 97207
R. P. Tye, Dynatech R/D Company, 99 Erie Street,
Cambridge, MA 02139
J. R. Tyler, U.S. Fiber Corporatfon, 101 South Main Street,
Delphos, OH 45833
M. G. Van G e m , Construction Technology Laboratories, Portland
Cement Association, 5420 Old Orchard Road, Skokie, IL 60077
C. R. Vander Linden, Manville Corporatton, KekCar yl Ranch,
P.O. Box 5108, Denver, CO $0217
J. D. Verschoor, 179 Cajl Lane, Bailey, CO 80421
T. Vonier, Thomas Vonier Associates, I nc. ,
3741 "W" St r e e t , NW, Washington, DC 20009
J. R. Wallace, Wallace Thenaographics, P.O. Box $292,
Richmond, VA 23226
J. R. Warner, ACEC Research and Management Foundation,
1015 15th St., NW, Washington, DC 20005
R. Weil, Department of KTterials and Metallurgical Engineering,
Stevens Institute of Technology, Castle Point Station,
Hoboken, NJ 07030
R. Whitaker, tescher and Mahoney, IIZC. , 110 W. Waltann Lane,
Phoenix, AZ 55023
D. Whiting, Portland Cement Association, 5420 Old Orchard Road,
Skokie, XI., 60077
A. J. Willman, ACEC Research & Management Foundatlon,
1015 15th Street, NW, Washtngton, DC 20005
S . E. Zecher, AI A, Zechsr Associates, 42 Fayette St.,
Cambridge, MA 02139
DOE, Conservation
1000 Independence
J. J. Boulin
11. S . Coleman
L. T. Connor
E. C. Freeman
W, Gerken
M. Gorelick
R. E. Oliver
and Renewable Energy, Forrestal Building,
Avenue, Washington, DC 20545
P. Pierman
S. M. Showard
S. A. Smith
S . Tagore
S . J. Taylor
R. Teichman
DOE, Bonneville Power Admlnistration, Y.O. Box 3621 , Portland,
OR 97208
C. D. Auburg E. Johannes
23
227. DOE, Oak Ridge Operations, P. 0. Box E, Oak Ridge, TN 37831
228. DOE, Oregon, 102 L&T Building, Salem, OR 97310
Assistant Manager for Energy Research and Development
J. Kempfer
229-482.
DOE, Technical faformation Center, P.O. Box 62, Oak Ridge, TN 37831
For distrlbution as shown in DOE/TIC-4500, Distribution
Category UC-95d (Energy Conversion-Buildings and Community Systems)