The shearing force in beams experiment gives students a visualisation and proof of the basic theory of shear force. This provides a sound foundation for further work. The experiments are quick, clear and accurate, and ideal for students working on their own or in groups. The experiment was conducted by the demonstrator. The demonstrator guided the groups with the procedure and the calculation method or technic. The experiment was set-up as figure A below. There are two parts of beam and support. Left hand support and right hand support is placed 300mm and 600mm to the cut section respectively. Hanger 1 and hanger 2 is positioned to the middle part of left and right part of beam respectively. While, hanger 3 is placed on the groove near the cut section beam. The two balance springs is used to adjust the bar until two halves are balanced and take the spring balance reading. Then 10N weight is placed on hanger 2 and realign it. The reading of spring balance is recorded. Next, the step is repeated with weight on hanger 3. After that, without any readjustment on the spring, hanger 3 is moved to the left part beam(place the groove) and the condition is observed. 10N weights is transferred to hanger 1 and the situation is also observed. The steps is repeated by using 20N and 5N weight.
Figure A
2
Introduction Shearing forces are unaligned forces pushing one part of a body in one direction, and another part of the body in the opposite direction (William A. Nash, 1 July 1998). For this case, shear force is the force in the beam acting perpendicular to its longitudinal x-axis. For design purposes, the beam ability to resist shear force is more important than its ability to resist an axial force. Axial force is the force in the beam acting parallel to the longitudinal axis. Moving loads on beams are common features of design. Many road bridges are constructed from beam, and have to be designed to a string of wheel loads, or a uniformly distributed load. A beam is a horizontal structural element that is capable of withstanding load primarily by resisting bending The bending force induced into the material of the beam as a result of the external loads, own weight, span and external reactions to these loads is called a bending moment. If the ends of a beam are restrained longitudinally by its support or if a beam is a component of a continuous frame, axial force may also develop. If the axial force is small, the typical situation for most beams can be neglected when the member is designed. In the case, of reinforced concrete beams, small values of axial compression actually produce a modest increase (on the order of 5 to 10 percents) in the flexural strength of the member. To design a beam, the engineer must construct the shear and moment curves to determine the location and magnitude of the maximum values of these forces. Except for short, heavily loaded beams whose dimensions are controlled by shear requirements, the proportion of the cross section are determined by the magnitude of the maximum moment in the span. After a section is sized at the point of maximum moment, the design is completed by verifying that the shear stresses at the point of maximum shear usually adjacent to a support are equal to or less than the allowable shear strength of the material. Finally, the deflection produced by service loads must be checked to ensure that the member has adequate stiffness. Limits on deflection are set by structural codes. To provide this information graphically, we construct shear and moment curves. These curves, which preferably should be drawn to scale, consist of values of shear and moment plotted as ordinates against distance along the axis of the beam. Although we can construct shear and moment curves by cutting free bodies at intervals along the axis of a beam and writing equation of equilibrium to establish the values of shear and moment at particular section, it is much simpler to construct these curves from the basic relationships that exist between load, shear and moment. The method of solving the problem is to use influence lines. An influence line shows the variation of an external or internal force as a unit load travels across the length of the structure. For a beam-type bridge structure, the internal force may be either a transverse shear force or bending moment acting at some discrete location along the length of the bridge. e.g of wood bridge. 3
Influence lines for truss bridges are commonly used to show the magnitude of the axial force acting in a truss member as a unit load travels across the panel points of the bottom chord. Furthermore, influence lines for the reaction forces at external support locations are employed in all bridge types to determine the amount of load transferred to the bridge bearings. The two common methods for constructing an influence line are through consideration of equilibrium or by applying the concept of virtual work (i.e., the Mller- Breslau Principle). There are also Shear Force Diagram (SFD) that is to indicates how a force applied perpendicular to the axis of a beam is transmitted along the length of that beam. Also, Bending Moment Diagram (BMD) is to show how the applied loads to a beam create a moment variation along the length of the beam. These diagrams are used to determine the normal and shear stresses as well as deflection and slopes. At any point along its length, a beam can transmit a bending moment M(x) and a shear force V(x). if a loaded beam is changed, the descriptions of a positive distributed load, shear force and positive bending moment are as figure below.
Where scattered loads acts downward on the beam, internal shear force causes a clockwise rotation of the beam section on which it acts, and the internal moment causes compression in the top fibers of the segment, or to bend the segment so that it holds water.
Shear force and bending moment
4
Shear force at left of the section, S c = W ( L-a ) ..equation 1 L Shear force at the right of the cut section, S c = -Wa equation 2 L
The shear force at the cut is equal to the algebraic sum of the force acting to the left or right of the cut.
Objectives To observe and recognise the action of a shear load in a beam. To examine how shear force varies at the cut position of the beam for various loading conditions and compare with the theoretical calculation. To calculate the shear force at a normal part of loaded beam and to verify its agreement with principle.
Results Weight on Hanger / N Spring force / N Shear force / N 1 2 3 Experiment Theory Ratio = Theory Experiment
Discussion From the experiments done by our group, we found that, there is inconsistent difference between the values of Experimental Shear Force and the Theoretical Shear Force. Referring to this results, we conclude that the differences between the value of the experiment and theory was probably cause by the mistake done by our group member when taking the value for the force when it was hang on the beam. Also, parallax error occur and the spring balance is not in good condition. Some parts of the spring balance is rust. The table where we conduct the experiment is slightly unbalanced. a) When the load was doubled, did the shearing force double?
Yes, the shearing force is doubled.
b) How well did the experimental results agree with the theoretical values? Use the average of the ratios experiment/theory.
For 10N on hanger 3 and 20N on hanger 2, the values of theory of shear force are almost the same with the experimental values. Also, for 10N on hanger 2 and 5N on each of the hanger, the theoritical values of shear force are higher than the experimental values. But the ratio for 10N on hanger 3 is near average. For 10N on hanger 3 and 20N on hanger 2, the ratio are almost accurate and for 5N on each hanger the ratio is below average at 0.38.
Conclusion From this experiment, our group managed to examine how shear force varies with an increasing point load. We also managed to examine how shear force varies at the cut position of the beam for various loading conditions. From the experiment, we know that the value for the experimental and theoretical values is totally difference. References William A. Nash (1 July 1998). Schaum's Outline of Theory and Problems of Strength of Materials. McGraw-Hill Professional. p. 82. ISBN 978-0-07-046617-3. Retrieved 20 May 2012. Hibbeler, R.C. (2004). Mechanics of Materials. New Jersey USA: Pearson Education. p. 32