Is it possible that a universal language, one which transcends the classical categories of composition, line and spatial arrangement underlies great works of ancient art? Thus far evidence for such a claim has eluded archaeologists and art historians. We believe the answer to this question lies in the recovery of an archaic communication form we refer to as the Canon of Measure. This narrative entertains the origin of such a system and the works of art and architecture in which it is embedded.
Original Title
Art, Measure and Synchronicity: Introduction to the Canon of Measure
Is it possible that a universal language, one which transcends the classical categories of composition, line and spatial arrangement underlies great works of ancient art? Thus far evidence for such a claim has eluded archaeologists and art historians. We believe the answer to this question lies in the recovery of an archaic communication form we refer to as the Canon of Measure. This narrative entertains the origin of such a system and the works of art and architecture in which it is embedded.
Is it possible that a universal language, one which transcends the classical categories of composition, line and spatial arrangement underlies great works of ancient art? Thus far evidence for such a claim has eluded archaeologists and art historians. We believe the answer to this question lies in the recovery of an archaic communication form we refer to as the Canon of Measure. This narrative entertains the origin of such a system and the works of art and architecture in which it is embedded.
From the work of Bernard I. Pietsch by Suzanne Thompson "Is it possible that a universal language, one which transcends the classical categories of composition, line and spatial arrangement underlies great works of ancient art? Thus far evidence for such a claim has eluded archeologists and art historians. We believe the answer to this question lies in the recovery of an archaic communication form we refer to as the Canon of Measure. This narrative entertains the origin of such a system and the works of art and architecture in which it is embedded. One hallmark in the evolution of a great civilization is the sophistication and competence of its metrology or use of measure. Standards of measure organize society and facilitate every aspect of cultural intercourse from commerce and real estate to taxation and coinage. Standards of measure are vested expressions of a cultures values and identity. During the time of the American Revolution, a debate arose regarding the new nations options for establishing its own system of weights, measures and money. One aim of the founding fathers was to disassociate with anything British. Another was the aspiration to incorporate on every level of commerce the ideals energized by the Age of Enlightenmentto establish standards supported by scientific principles. During this same period the French were introducing a metric system based on earth measures and designed to facilitate international trade. Although more efficient than either English or American denominations of conveyance, the metric system failed to gain the approval of the congress. The French system did not adequately demonstrate the ideal of e pluribus unum; true commensurability it was argued should join all categories of measure: weight, temperature, distance, volume, time etc. Today most of the world has adopted the metric system. Only the United States and a few small nations maintain the provincial units of inches, feet, yards and miles. We might wonder if our adherence to an antique metrology indicates some perception of infidelity in the metric system. If so, from whence does such an intuition arise? On the other hand, it could also be asked if there is an archetypal body of measure, one with which we would resonate--one which might, as the founding fathers sought, be embraced for its intrinsic integrity? The answer to this question draws not from the present but from the distant past, and is the subject of the following address. Bernard Pietsch and Suzanne Thompson 2014 Art Measure and Synchronicity: Introduction to the Canon of Measure Page 2 of 12 Where does measure come from? Historically, the fate of ancient systems of measure has been tied to conquest, assimilation and the spoils of war. One culture over takes another and the ways of the victor are instituted. Over time, the traditions of the conquered become homogenized with those of the invaders and the rites and rituals of the hosts are lost to posterity. Although modern civil measure no longer corresponds directly to the values that may have inspired ancient civilizations buildings and designs, bits and pieces of archaic systems do persist to this day. Linkage to earlier forms is evident. Less apparent however, is the genesis of archaic units of measure. Did they evolve from a singular source? Is there some fundamental that organizes them? If so, what are the tools of transmission? There is an allusive quality to the aspect of measure we are pursuing--one obscured by history because it employs a level of communication not amenable to direct analysis. Understanding measure in its deepest and most esoteric context requires a different type of inquiry. To fathom the landscape of the ancient mind from which the language of measure emerged, we need insight into the origin of the earliest units of measure and the consciousness of the collective wisdom from which it was summoned. Our sources lie dormant in ancient works of art and architecture. Reconstruction: How Do You Read? The art of reading a remnant of a work of art is part and parcel of seeing beyond the fragment, to the context of the whole form. The process involves more than reassembling blocks of stone and fixing broken pieces of sculpture. From our point of view, the goal of restoration is to contact the mind of the artist and reclaim from the fragment itself, the intent of the work. Restoration requires attention to that which is physically present and to that which informed its remains. We want to know what unifying principle was driving the artist. What was the larger communication of which the broken piece is but a part? From the remains of once magnificent structures, levels of organization beyond our imagination await being made whole again. The enabling mechanism of this organizing principle descends from the distant past through a system we call the Canon of Measure. The conveyance of the canon is both archetypal and synchronistic: it emerges universallyhence evidence of its derivatives is found on all continents and time periods and in diverse art forms. The canon of which we speak will not be found in modern text books. Nonetheless, it arises from the consciousness which informs and unifies the great monuments of the antiquarian world. Bernard Pietsch and Suzanne Thompson 2014 Art Measure and Synchronicity: Introduction to the Canon of Measure Page 3 of 12 Over the course of this and following articles we will address such questions as: 1. What is the source of the canon of measure? How is it linked to observations of the natural order, geometry, mathematics and physics? 2. How are the emergent principles of the canon demonstrated in ancient art and literature? What characteristics identify a work as participant in a sacred tradition? How does a work speak to us and what are the tools of transmission? 3. What can be learned from the canon of measure and how it was implemented? We begin with a mythic allusion to the gods and their descent into the material world. Saturn: Icon and Source of Measure If the universe is a harmonized whole, then we would expect any system based on Nature to have at its source fundamental and ubiquitous elements which are demonstrated on the largest and the smallest scales. Any system which reconciles and contains all diversity obeys a unifying principle. In all of nature, astronomy and physics that principle, expressed mathematically as 1/.618, underlies all dynamics, structure and process. It is known variously as the Golden Proportion, the Golden Mean, phi or the Golden Number. The universe is the manifestation of this principle--Nature builds in the Golden Proportion. Every organism expresses this directive in its unique way, and none strays far from its constraints. All natural expression whether organic or dynamic is derivative of this principle. Given the ubiquity of phi in the natural order, it is not surprising that recognition of the Golden Proportion is shared by many cultures. Homage to its sanctity surfaces in works of architecture, art and literature all over the world and from earliest times. Even the most primitive art can be seen to express the kinship humans experienced with Nature and its forces. Measure evolved out of the recognition of this primal relationship (ratio) between humans and the universe. Whether recording the phases of the moon by notching a bone, painting the change of seasons on a cave wall, commemorating wisdom stories in the stars, or carving symbols on stones, humans mark time. In legend, the ancient Greeks identified Kronos or Saturn as the custodian of measure and time-keeper of the solar family. Of all the planets in the solar system, Saturn is personified as the most rigorous, the most regular and the most stable. More than any other body in the solar system, Saturns path exhibits the least deviation; it is able to absorb the perturbations and disturbances of space. True to the myth, Saturn is imperturbable. Astronomically, it could be said that Saturn's orbital performance provides a dependable gauge against which Earth's fluctuations in space can be observed, Bernard Pietsch and Suzanne Thompson 2014 Art Measure and Synchronicity: Introduction to the Canon of Measure Page 4 of 12 Fig. 1 In the 17 th century Kepler recognized the conjunction pattern of Saturn and Jupiter in his diagram called the Trigon of Great Conjunctions. Events occurring during this conjunction were believed to be of great astrological portent. More importantly was the fact that Kepler was able to predict by calculation the astronomical conjunctions of the two planets and the tiny amount of precession exhibited between the points of their conjunctions. for only against a reliable standard can deviation, development, growth, or decline be measured. Viewed from our position on Earth, when it appears that Saturn is off schedule, so to speak, we can be fairly certain that it is we who are off. Saturn acts as a good mirror for planet Earth's comparatively capricious dance through space. As might be expected, Saturn also demonstrates the pervasiveness of the Golden Proportion in our solar system. The Golden Mean is Natures geometric signature. Though only an abstraction, it is through comparison with this mean, that the individuality of any natural event or living geometry can be recognized. The identity of a plant for example, can be recognizable by its individual adaptation to or departure from the Golden Mean--Nature's guarantee of individuality within the law. Numerically, the Golden Number is expressed as the minutes in the planet Saturn's rotational day: 618 minutes. Geometrically we see the Golden Ratio on a planetary level exemplified by the conjunction period of Saturn and Jupiter. Every twenty years or so, Saturn conjuncts with Jupiter at the phi point, or .618 mark of its orbit. In other words, when Jupiter completes one revolution around the Sun plus .618 of its next 360 degree orbit, as seen from Earth, it appears once again closely aligned or conjunct with Saturn. After twenty more years we will again see them close in the sky but advanced about 222+ degrees-- the phi proportion of their circuit through the heavens. See Fig. 1 A Canon of Measure The essentials of our canon system could be derived from the close observation of any natural event or structure. Although we are presenting the canon in perfect units, perfect units are not observed in the natural world. Like the Golden Number, the canon is an abstraction against which the physical world can be measured. Number concepts like the mean solar day of 1440 minutes, the calendar year of 365 days, or the lunar year of 354 days etc., are average periods. In reality the duration of each period varies slightly from day to day and year to year. But without the concept of an average, it would be difficult to establish how much any one day or any one year deviates from the mean. Exactly how the canon of measure was transmitted historically, we cannot say. But the canon can always be recovered by going to the ancient works themselves. Temples, tombs, and monuments are repositories of concepts Bernard Pietsch and Suzanne Thompson 2014 Art Measure and Synchronicity: Introduction to the Canon of Measure Page 5 of 12 expressed using the canon of measure, and when read properly; their content is available to all ages. The works are the evidence. Between the Lines In addition to stone monuments, temples and tombs, sacred measure is also buried in ancient literature. Just as in architecture the method of conveyance through literature, though indirect, is not hidden. Herodotus the 4th Century B.C.E. Greek historian writes in a style which is alternately illusive and implausible, yet his work is strangely informative when understood. In Section 149, of The History, Book II Herodotus description of Lake Moeris is a coded reference to Saturn's function as the foundation of measure. Herodotus tells us that Lake Moeris, "a work even more astonishing than the Labyrinths," was sixty shones or 3600 furlongs in circumference. After his description of the Lake, Herodotus assigns numerical values to the furlong, the cubit, and the palm. If we use the modern conventional unit of a furlong at 660 feet, the figure of 3600 furlongs is unengaging. When the canon furlong of 657.27 feet is invoked however, Herodotus' intended communication becomes more transparent. The numbers become instantly significant when Lake Moeris is seen as a veiled reference to Saturn. The feet in 3600 Canon furlongs divided by ten is equal to the number of miles in Saturn's circumference: 236,617.2 miles. This figure is the numerical basis for developing a system of Earth measures relative to Saturn and its performance. We'll be seeing this figure again shortly. a The History is filled with literary ruse doubling as coded information. Keys to the code are frequently given in the wording of Herodotus numerous accounts. These various and lengthy enumerations are veiled references to the canon. The phrases "well worthy of notice" or "very worthy of mention" or "well deserves to be described" alert the reader to pay close attention to what is about to follow. Directions for manipulating numbers are often inferred in such phrases as "subterranean passage," "ditch," or "tunnel" which can mean take the reciprocal of the figure just given. The use of the word "generation" refers to the use of multiplication. "Round about" or "all around" indicates use of the circle as degrees or fractions thereof. A phrase concerning a certain number of "days journey" can imply that the total number of hours or minutes during that period may be a significant key figure. There is more in Herodotus than meets the literal eye. We will revisit his commentaries on Egypt, the pyramids and what he was told by the temple priests in other chapters. Parting the Veil Sacred or canon measures are hidden only in the sense of being obscured by too narrow a perspective. Events which at first glance seem unrelated, when observed from a more distant point of view, can be seen as connected. A pattern emerges; a sense of scale realized. For this reason we sometimes think of canon a The Voyager missions in the 1980s reckoned Saturns circumference as 236,780 milesabout 162.8 miles more than our figure. The canon figure is a scant .9993120423 accurate. Bernard Pietsch and Suzanne Thompson 2014 Art Measure and Synchronicity: Introduction to the Canon of Measure Page 6 of 12 measures as cosmic values because they relate to a larger framework than that visible from here on Earth. One of the major keys that reveals to us the domain of the cosmic is represented by a numerical ratio we call K for short. K represents the ratio with which we part the veil. From the phenomenal world we enter the cosmic realm--a dimension where time, distance, velocity, number, and geometry become co-in-ci-dent with one another, where everything is in one thing, and where the law "as above, so below" becomes observable. Here the application and utility of number in all its forms transcends the limitations imposed by ordinary logic. Here, number becomes time, distance, angle, ratio, and logarithm. Once invoked the magic inherent in number and all its synchronicity is made available. K is the number 1.01430555. With it, the first measures to be unveiled are those of time. The ancients understood the intimate and inseparable relationship of time with all dimensions. (By invoking K we will reveal the legendary "harmony of the spheres." But first some groundwork must be laid. For a number of important reasons we adopt 365.15 days as the length of the canonical solar year. b 365.15 divided by K produces the Sacred Year of 360 days. The same length of time is involved but the relationship of the year to the circle of 360 is clearly established. From this ancient Sacred Year we derive the following units: The derivation of the canon or sacred day of 24 hours 20 minutes and 36 seconds is more than a mathematical construction. It is also the day responded to by plants and organisms. Circadian rhythms (meaning round about a day) tend to be about 20+ minutes longer than the mean solar day of 24 hours; biological rhythms in humans as well seem to follow this cycle. Notice also that the number of minutes in the Canon Year, 525816 divided by 100 renders the number for the feet in the Canon Mile: 5258.16 It is both itself and the other: time and length. Synchronistically, 525816 has one foot on land and one in the domain of time. As we shall see, the canon mile has its origin in time. Earth Measures Derived from Saturn How are linear units of Earth measure derived from Saturn? Each unit as a standard will reflect some connection with Saturn, and because all the units are commensurate with one another, equatorial Earth measures can be derived, from just two primary units: 1. The number of feet to the ancient canon mile, 5258.16. b 365.15 also corresponds to the number of inches in the perimeter of the base of Cheops Pyramid: 36,515 inches. (Divide by 100 = 365.15 1.0143055 (K) = 360 365.15 ONE CANON YEAR 360 Days 525816 Minutes 8763.6 Hours ONE CANON DAY 24.34333 Hours 1460.6 Minutes 87,636 Seconds Bernard Pietsch and Suzanne Thompson 2014 Art Measure and Synchronicity: Introduction to the Canon of Measure Page 7 of 12 236617.2 = 5258.16 feet 45 2. The number of canon miles in the circumference of the Earth as 25,000. c Begin with the primary unit for measuring the Earth--the second of arc at the Equator: 101.430555 feet. Looking again to Saturn, the length of this unit is nested in Saturn's daily rotational period is 10 hours 14 minutes and 35 seconds. Expressed decimally it is the number 10.1430555. Multiply this by 10 to arrive at 101.430555. Taken as feet, we now have the number of feet to the second of arc on the Earth's equator. Notice K 1.01430555, within the number. If we allow the testimony of Herodotus that there were "eight gods who existed before the rest," d and that these eight were the gods of Measure, each represents one eighth of the circle or 45 degrees. Divide the foundation of measure, Saturn's circumference, 236,617.2 by 45 and we arrive at the ancient value for the number of feet in the canon mile. Recall that this number, 5258.16 x 100 is also the same as the number of minutes in the Canon Year: 525,816. Using the framework of the 360 circle, Canon equatorial units can now be developed: c The number of miles in the Earth's equator at 25,000 is taken from the Sacred Cubit of 25 inches. The modern day Clarke Spheroid is 24,901.55 miles @ 5280 feet/mile. d Herodotus makes several references to "the twelve gods and the eight before them" in his second book The History, Book II. 1,296,000 seconds of arc 21,600 minutes of arc 101.430555 feet to the second of arc 5258.16 feet to the canon mile CIRCUMFERENCE (360 degrees) 25,000 miles 40,000 kilometers 200,000 furlongs 131,454,000 feet ONE DEGREE OF ARC 69.4444444 miles 111.111111 kilometers 555.555555 furlongs 365150 feet ONE MINUTE OF ARC: 6085.833 feet ONE SECOND OF ARC: 101.430555 feet 1217.1666 inches Bernard Pietsch and Suzanne Thompson 2014 Art Measure and Synchronicity: Introduction to the Canon of Measure Page 8 of 12 Canon units of measure are not invented arbitrarily. They are derived, from time. A period of time can also be used to represent a unit of length, e.g. 5258.16 feet to the mile has the same number as the minutes in the canon Year: 525816, a synchronicity which begs the inference that the mile is inextricably linked to Time. Another descendent from a Saturn unit of measure emerges by juxtaposing distance with time: the canon meter. Divide the number for the circumference of Saturn, 236,617.2 by the number of minutes in Earth's mean solar day, 1440, divide by 100, and the result is exactly one-half the measure we identify as the canon meter: This canon metric value is actually commensurate with the duodecimal (English) system. In the most alchemical fashion, the precipitate of the two systems exceeds the limitations of either. Canon metrics expose a relationship between the two traditions that is not otherwise apparent. Ideally, the two systems work together and need not be a source of contention. Thomas Jefferson was intuitively correct in resisting adoption of the French meter in the United States. He recognized the importance of endorsing a truly commensurate figure which would unify time, space, and matter. He discerned that the French system did not fulfill this requirement. The Furlong The ancient measure of the canon furlong is correlated with Saturn as one degree of its circumference in miles, expressed on Earth in feet as: 236617.2 = 164.3175 1440 164.3175 x 2 = 3.28635 feet in 1 canon meter 100 (3.28635 x 12 = 39.4362 inches in 1 canon meter) 236617.2 = 657.27 This number is now taken as the feet in one canon furlong. 360 ONE CANON MILE = 1600 canon meters 1 39.4362 = .0253574127 ONE CANON METER = 3.28635 feet or 39.4362 inches .0253574127 x 100 = 2.5374127cm/inch Bernard Pietsch and Suzanne Thompson 2014 Art Measure and Synchronicity: Introduction to the Canon of Measure Page 9 of 12 The canon furlong is exactly 200 meters or 1/8th of a canon mile. The furlong times 20,000 is the number of feet in the circumference of the Earth: 657.27 x 20,000 = 131,454,000 feet on the Equator. As shown, the figure 1.01430555 has a number of transformations and applications. It is the multiplier which changes the number of seconds in the circle into the number of canon feet on the Equator: 1,296.000 x 1.01430555 = 131,454,000 feet As a divisor it transforms the sacred year into the lunar year: As 101.430555 it is the number of feet to the second of arc on the Equator. As 10.1430555 it is the number of hours in Saturn's day. This day is the period of "phenomenal" observation. This would be reckoned as about 608.583333 minutes. The canon day for Saturn is 10.3 hours, or 618 minutes. These various manifestations demonstrate the synchronistic aspects of the canon system. One number can have significance on different levels; one number can transcend categories. The equatorial second of arc 101.430555 feet for example, is in a sense the first Earth measure. It also embodies what we might term the last measure: the rate of the precession of the equinoxes. The rate of precession is a finely tuned figure, computed after the motions, perturbations, and impressions of all the planets and masses in the solar system have been calculated. The rate of the precession always varies, but it averages to approximately 50.9 seconds of arc per year, also recognizable as 1/2 ( K x 100). 101.430555 = 50.7152+- seconds of arc per year. 2 The canon value for annual precession is 50.90017909 seconds of arc. The Human Connection The rhythms and cycles of the cosmos abide in all of Nature--mineral, vegetable and animal. If measures, though abstractions, are based on relevant frequencies and events occurring in the universe, they are inherently related to one another. Because humans evolved in a framework affected by vibratory rates--diurnal rotations, lunar phases, revolutions around the Sun etc., it is reasonable to infer that the spectrum of these various vibrational frequencies would be designed into what humans have become both as form and process. Mankind is, as is all of 360___ 1.01430555 = 354.9226347 days in lunar year. Bernard Pietsch and Suzanne Thompson 2014 Art Measure and Synchronicity: Introduction to the Canon of Measure Page 10 of 12 Nature, the repository of the cycles and patterns of its developing environment. We are the result of our biological, geophysical, and astronomical heritage. The genetic code contains not only the blueprint of any individual organism, but also the cumulative record of its entire species. It is from the internal measures of the harmonized Individual--the frequencies and ratios of the heartbeat, the breath, the voice, the orgasmic impulse etc. that the canon emerges. Physiological events occurring in Time are the ground of the canonas Zen philosophers tell us, "Everything is in one thing." The foundation of measure is the human body itself. When canon measuring units are applied to observations and made the basis of evaluation, the relationships between above and below arise as pattern. Harmony is observable and deviation from the harmonized is experienced as dis- harmony. The astronomical activity of Saturn is the source and model of our understanding of harmony, but it is from within that we yield to our relationship with the whole. In order to quantify our relationship with the whole and with time, we look to a translational instrument, one which just does, without bias. It is an instrument which is available to anyone, everywhere and in any age; an instrument which can represent all times together yet respond to the uniqueness of the moment. Oracles of the Canon: Process as Measure Time The most elegant conduit between the dimension of time and the physical world of linear measure is the pendulum. In ancient art, the use of the pendulum allowed a period of time to be translated into the signification of a measure of length. Once translated into a physical expression, that length could then be incorporated into a sculpture, building or monument. The height of an object could convey a period of time. For example, the heights of many famous passageways, gates and obelisks in the ancient world, when assigned as the height of a pendulum, refer to meaningful periods of time. Often the references are calendrical: lunar cycles, planetary periods, or the duration of the last quarter day of the year. Reference to location in latitude and longitude were also frequently invoked. Location Location in latitude and longitude can also be identified by appealing to the oracle of the pendulum. That the location of a monument could be determined from the geometry of the monument itself is one of the finest indicators of the ancient architects talent. The monument is where it is and verifies its location from within the monument itself. Each monument in the studies which follow will demonstrate this feature. The sculpture most associated with the aspect of self- location is the obelisk, epitomized most dramatically by the Washington Monument. Bernard Pietsch and Suzanne Thompson 2014 Art Measure and Synchronicity: Introduction to the Canon of Measure Page 11 of 12 Great Pyramid Lion Gate at Mycene The Washington Monument is longitude and latitude specific. It marks its location on the Earth. Because it was modeled after an ancient Egyptian obelisk, the Washington Monument has in its measures and proportions many geometric correlations with the canon of measure, both apparent and concealed. Details of our original research on this great monument can be found at: www.scribd.com/bernardpietsch Scroll down to The Washington Monument: Icon by Design A short video presentation is also available at www.vimeo.com/channels/WrittenInStone Weight Determining the accurate weight of precious metals, especially gold, was as important to commerce in the ancient world as it is today. The origin of many modern coins size and weight can be traced to ancient sources. e Our own United States coinage follows in this tradition. The size of the US dollar for example, was modeled on the Spanish milled dollar which was derived from an ancient Mayan unit of gold. Its diameter, 1.577448 inches, is one Mayan Inch. One billion Mayan Inches represent the number of inches in the canon circumference of the Earth: the least and the largest, in one number. The Art of Indication It may be said that the highest level of the stone carvers art is the language of informed empty space. The space indicated by a work of art is not part of the work itself; it is an extension of the work. The projection is empty; but the space contained by its geometry, though not material, is conceivable and therefore measurable. There are many great examples of informed empty space in the ancient world: the top or apex of the Great Pyramid, the great stone doorways and gates of Mycenae, Greece, Chaco Canyon, Arizona, and Machu Picchu, Peru to name a few. Each of these works is characteristic of what could be termed sacred art. As we understand it, the notion of the sacred properly refers to a process more than to an object. A work of sacred art has the potential to engage a participant in the process of transformation-- transformation of what is, to another level of what is. Participation is required. e We have also discovered a profound common origin to our modern system of grains, grams and ounces. All derive from the metrologically discerned relationship between water and gold. In our article, Secrets of the Jade Cong we delve into the intimate relationship between water, gold, and jade wherein chemistry, physics and geology merge with geometry in a single Chinese artifact known to archaeology simply as a ritual device for the worship of heaven and earth. T-Shaped doorway, Chaco Canyon Bernard Pietsch and Suzanne Thompson 2014 Art Measure and Synchronicity: Introduction to the Canon of Measure Page 12 of 12 Only space can indicate the sacred. Only space can be incorruptible, timeless, and perfect. Though not available to the senses, the geometry of the sacred can be apprehended from a physical form--from the crumbling remains of an ancient ruin, the perfect intention of a works design can be reconstructed and its indicated meaning ascertained. In the articles New Perspectives On the Great Pyramid which follow, we will look more closely at how this art is rendered in the grandest and most articulate example of ancient architecture. Intihuatana, Machu Picchu