You are on page 1of 74

October 11, 2014 Amendment to Emergency

Hearing Motion, et al.
With Plea to Jurisdiction, etc.


IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF COWETA COUNTY
STATE OF GEORGIA

John Harold Murphy, Plaintiff
vs. Civil Action No. 12V-413
Nancy Michelle Murphy, Defendant
October 11, 2014 Amendment to
October 6, 2014 and Oct 7 Motions Seeking Emergency Relief

John Harold Murphy and Renee L. Haugerud can hardly go a week without some
of their irrational, probably alcoholic induced, behavior that the “Custody
Evaluator” obviously failed to identify and the Guardian ad Litem obviously
concealed. This week’s litigation based eruption is headed as follows.

Page 2 of 7
October 11, 2014 Amendment to Emergency
Hearing Motion, et al.
With Plea to Jurisdiction, etc.


1. John Harold Murphy and Renee L. Haugerud attempt to Intimidate
Michelle Murphy by abusing Jack Murphy, age 15 and Thomas Murphy,
age 13. They could have no love for these children -- just compare the lives
that the children had before the May 27, 2014 Temper Tantrum Violation
of the Code of Judicial Conduct and the lives that Jack and Thomas now
have.
1.1 Just as a Trojan Horse computer virus inflicts continuing detriment to
computers, Judge Baldwin’s August 23, 2013 ex parte obtained Order and his
Order relating to the May 27, 2014 hearing continue to inflict very devastating
Page 3 of 7
October 11, 2014 Amendment to Emergency
Hearing Motion, et al.
With Plea to Jurisdiction, etc.

Code of Judicial Conduct and constitutional violations.
1.1.1 John Harold Murphy, with the financial resources of Renee L. Haugerud
has multiplied the injuries inflicted by Judge Baldwin upon this family of
Michelle Murphy, Jack Murphy and Thomas Murphy, who did not have the
financial resources to fulfill the requirement of Judge Baldwin for this family to
continue to pay for the broomstick of the Wicked Witch of the West that he
habitually ordered the family to fetch.
1.1.2 To protect the rights of Michelle Murphy, Jack Murphy and Thomas
Murphy, a lawyer must now participate in litigation in Georgia, Utah and
St. Thomas, USVI without a penny of financial resources to compete with these
multimillionaire hedge fund gamblers.
1.1.3 This litigation is enriching the Glover & Davis lawyers who pad the
financial and political pockets of Judge Baldwin and hand picked him for the
very detrimental suffering that he has inflicted upon this family.
1.1.4 Michelle Murphy amends her October 6, 2014 and October 7, 2014
Emergency Motions to provide the Court with information unavailable to
Michelle Murphy and her counsel when the October 6, 2014 and October 7, 2014
Motions were filed.
1.2 Jack and Thomas are apparently still in Utah at a lockdown residential
“treatment” center with a history of abusive treatment toward its teenage
captives, and Judge Baldwin has yet to set a hearing and require their attendance.
1.3 John Harold Murphy and Renee L. Haugerud, apparently still with money
derived or originating from Renee L. Haugerud and her hedge funds, have now
employed Virgin Island lawyers in St. Thomas, USVI in an attempt to seal the
abusive treatment of Jack and Thomas.
Page 4 of 7
October 11, 2014 Amendment to Emergency
Hearing Motion, et al.
With Plea to Jurisdiction, etc.

1.4 It is relevant to note that on page 2 of the proposed order that the order now
seeks to include not just “contact” as included in the Glover & Davis prepared
Order that Judge Baldwin signed, but “calling,” and “communicating” in addition
to the previous requirement of no “contact.”
1.5 Michelle Murphy has had no contact with the children since May 27, 2014,
as she has only communicated with the children by voice and text messages.
1.6 It does not take a Ph.D. in psychology to detect the strategy of the
guardian ad litem, Elizabeth “Lisa” Harwell, in attempting to secret the
consequences of Judge Baldwin’s violations of the Code of Judicial Conduct and
violations of constitutional protections inflicted upon this family by providing an
opinion that it would not be in the best interest of the children to come to Georgia
and testify about the contributing to the delinquency criminal conduct of John
Harold Murphy and Renee L. Haugerud that Trevor Bishop disclosed. See
Attachment 143.
1.7 Using the bad faith communication of Lisa Harwell (Attachment 144)
Judge Baldwin denied a hearing on the July 31
st
Emergency motion.
1.8 John Harold Murphy and Renee L. Haugerud subject Jack and Thomas to
incarceration at Elevations RTC, a/k/a Island View RTC, to so intimidate these
children as to inhibit them from informing the Court about their treatment since
May 27, 2014, as John Harold Murphy will threaten them that if they inform
anyone of his and Renee L. Haugerud’s wrongdoings, he will send them back to
Utah. It is easy to reach this conclusion, as he earlier threatened to send them
away if they continued to state that they wanted to live with their mother. After
the photograph surfaced of Jack and Thomas holding a written plea to be returned
to their mother, they were whisked away to the lock-down facility in Utah.
Page 5 of 7
October 11, 2014 Amendment to Emergency
Hearing Motion, et al.
With Plea to Jurisdiction, etc.

2. Judge Baldwin’s imprudent removal of the following Prohibition of
Removing the Children from the Jurisdiction provision of the Standing Order
of the Superior Court of Coweta County created both the St. Thomas litigation and
the Elevations RTC confinement in Utah issues.
2.1 Judge Baldwin removed the Standing Order requirement of not removing the
children from the jurisdiction of the court, executed by all of the judges of the
Coweta Judicial Circuit, without the consent of the other judges, while motions to
disqualify Judge Baldwin were pending for reasons that Judge Baldwin was
violating the Code of Judicial Conduct, the Uniform Superior Court Rules the laws
of Georgia and the due process protections of Michelle Murphy, Jack Murphy and
Thomas Murphy.

2.2 The documents filed by counsel for John Harold Murphy in St. Thomas are
included and incorporated here as Attachment 142.
The Temporary Custody Order Must be Overturned Immediately to address
the St. Thomas Litigation that Michelle Murphy cannot afford and to obtain
release of Jack and Thomas from the Elevations RTC, formerly branded as
Island View RTC
Page 6 of 7
October 11, 2014 Amendment to Emergency
Hearing Motion, et al.
With Plea to Jurisdiction, etc.

2.3 Island View Residential Treatment Center is a residential treatment
facility in Utah that changed its name to Elevations RTC when it came under
new ownership in May, 2014. Its logo and current branding follow.

2.4 Jack and Thomas are illegally institutionalized in Utah.
2.5 Michelle Murphy received communications from the classmates at the
school in St. Thomas who knew Jack Murphy and Thomas Murphy.
2.6 These communications inform the world that Jack and Thomas did not need
to be institutionalized and that the contribution to the delinquency of these
minors was a ploy of John and Renee to use the institutionalization of Jack and
Thomas in Utah to silence their voices and punish them for wanting expressing
their fervent desire to return to their home, church and schools in Newnan,
Georgia. The lock-down facility in Utah is now their home.
2.7 It is not Jack and Thomas who need institutionalizing, but, as one of their
classmates in St. Thomas wrote, it is John Harold Murphy and Renee L.
Haugerud who need treatment for their illness.
2.8 The Court should talk to these children and learn about the scam of the
Taylor Drake/Glover & Davis lawyers and these hedge fund operators.
Attachment 142, Page 1 of 61
Attachment 142, Page 2 of 61
Attachment 142, Page 3 of 61
Attachment 142, Page 4 of 61
Attachment 142, Page 5 of 61
Attachment 142, Page 6 of 61
Attachment 142, Page 7 of 61
Attachment 142, Page 8 of 61
Attachment 142, Page 9 of 61
Attachment 142, Page 10 of 61
Attachment 142, Page 11 of 61
Attachment 142, Page 12 of 61
Attachment 142, Page 13 of 61
Attachment 142, Page 14 of 61
Attachment 142, Page 15 of 61
Attachment 142, Page 16 of 61
Attachment 142, Page 17 of 61
Attachment 142, Page 18 of 61
Attachment 142, Page 19 of 61
Attachment 142, Page 20 of 61
Attachment 142, Page 21 of 61
Attachment 142, Page 22 of 61
Attachment 142, Page 23 of 61
Attachment 142, Page 24 of 61
Attachment 142, Page 25 of 61
Attachment 142, Page 26 of 61
Attachment 142, Page 27 of 61
Attachment 142, Page 28 of 61
Attachment 142, Page 29 of 61
Attachment 142, Page 30 of 61
Attachment 142, Page 31 of 61
Attachment 142, Page 32 of 61
Attachment 142, Page 33 of 61
Attachment 142, Page 34 of 61
Attachment 142, Page 35 of 61
Attachment 142, Page 36 of 61
Attachment 142, Page 37 of 61
Attachment 142, Page 38 of 61
Attachment 142, Page 39 of 61
Attachment 142, Page 40 of 61
Attachment 142, Page 41 of 61
Attachment 142, Page 42 of 61
Attachment 142, Page 43 of 61
Attachment 142, Page 44 of 61
Attachment 142, Page 45 of 61
Attachment 142, Page 46 of 61
Attachment 142, Page 47 of 61
Attachment 142, Page 48 of 61
Attachment 142, Page 49 of 61
Attachment 142, Page 50 of 61
Attachment 142, Page 51 of 61
Attachment 142, Page 52 of 61
Attachment 142, Page 53 of 61
Attachment 142, Page 54 of 61
Attachment 142, Page 55 of 61
Attachment 142, Page 56 of 61
Attachment 142, Page 57 of 61
Attachment 142, Page 58 of 61
Attachment 142, Page 59 of 61
Attachment 142, Page 60 of 61
Attachment 142, Page 61 of 61
Attachment 143, Page 1 of 1
1
Millard Farmer
From: Elizabeth Harwell <eharwell@hbhlawyer.com>
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2014 6:04 PM
To: Melissa Sams; Millard Farmer; Taylor Drake
Subject: RE: Murphy
Importance: High
Reasoning for not recommending Thomas and Jack be in Georgia for hearing: 
 
I.  The Defendant, Mrs. Murphy, has not yet submitted to the Rule 35 examination with Dr. King and is 
prohibited from having contact with the children until this has been accomplished and results 
provided.  There is reason to believe that Mrs. Michelle Murphy has violated this “no contact” portion of 
Judge Baldwin’s May 27
th
 Order significantly over the summer.  It would be even more difficult to enforce 
this portion of the Order if the children returned to Georgia for the hearing. 
 
II. Arrangements could be made for the children to communicate with the Court via Skype, FaceTime or 
telephonically. 
 
III. The children are enrolled in a  basketball camp for this week which began today. 
 
IV. Although other results could occur, the Court has three primary rulings which could be made at the 
conclusion of the hearing on Wednesday: 
a)Temporary Custody could remain with the Plaintiff, John Murphy; 
b)Temporary Custody could be awarded to the Defendant, Michelle Murphy; or 
c)Temporary Custody could be placed with a third party or entity 
 
Based on the turmoil that occurred after this Court’s ruling on May 27, 2014, should the Court choose any 
option other than II. b) above the possibility of similar, if not greater, turmoil is likely and exposure to that is 
definitely not in any child’s best interest.  Should the Court choose II. b) it is anticipated that arrangements 
for the boys to be returned to Georgia would occur expeditiously and without incident. 
 
 
Elizabeth Harwell 
 
From: Melissa Sams [mailto:msams@troupco.org]
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2014 2:51 PM
To: Elizabeth Harwell; Millard Farmer; Taylor Drake
Subject: RE: Murphy
 
Ms. Harwell, 
Judge Baldwin would like to you to give him your reasoning for why it is in the best interests of the children not to be 
present.  Also, we did find a court reporter for the hearing on Wednesday. 
Thank you, 
Melissa Sams 
 
From: Elizabeth Harwell [mailto:eharwell@hbhlawyer.com]
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2014 11:37 AM
Attachment 144, Page 1 of 2
2
To: Melissa Sams; Millard Farmer; Taylor Drake
Subject: Murphy
 
 
 
El i zabet h F. Har wel l
ehar wel l @hbhl awyer . com
Har wel l , Br own & Har wel l , P. C.
12 J ackson St . , Newnan GA 30263
Tel : 770. 251. 0800
Al t er nat e Tel : 770. 251. 0868
Facsi mi l e: 770. 251. 8300

I RS Ci r cul ar 230 Di scl osur e: To ensur e compl i ance wi t h r equi r ement s i mposed
by t he I RS, we i nf or myou t hat any U. S. f eder al t ax advi ce cont ai ned i n t hi s
communi cat i on ( i ncl udi ng any at t achment s) i s not i nt ended or wr i t t en t o be
used, and cannot be used, f or t he pur pose of ( i ) avoi di ng penal t i es under
t he I nt er nal Revenue Code or ( i i ) pr omot i ng, mar ket i ng or r ecommendi ng t o
anot her par t y any t r ansact i on or mat t er addr essed her ei n.

CONFI DENTI ALI TY NOTI CE: Thi s e- mai l communi cat i on, i ncl udi ng any at t ached
f i l es was sent by or on behal f of t he f i r mand may cont ai n mat er i al t hat i s
pr opr i et ar y, pr i vi l eged, conf i dent i al , or ot her wi se l egal l y exempt f r om
di scl osur e. Thi s Communi cat i on i s i nt ended sol el y f or t he use of t he
i ndi vi dual or ent i t y t o whi ch i t i s addr essed. I f you ar e not t he i nt ended
r eci pi ent or t he per son r esponsi bl e f or del i ver i ng t hi s Communi cat i on t o t he
i nt ended r eci pi ent , you ar e pr ohi bi t ed f r omr et ai ni ng, usi ng, di ssemi nat i ng,
f or war di ng, pr i nt i ng, or copyi ng t hi s Communi cat i on. I f you have r ecei ved
t hi s Communi cat i on i n er r or , pl ease i mmedi at el y not i f y t he sender vi a r et ur n
e- mai l or t el ephone.
 
Attachment 144, Page 2 of 2