13 views

Uploaded by Felipe Pablo Velasquez Guerino

save

- Output Sgot Dan Sgpt
- Censored Variables and Censored Regression
- Chapter 07 Tb
- General Attitude of College Students Towards Consequences and Impact of Television Advertising in Bahrain
- PSTAT122FinalPracSolutionsF16.pdf
- Group5_BestBuy
- MWD eg., Econometrics.doc
- Advanced Regression.pdf
- 00873859
- nmfs
- What is Multiple Linear Regression.docx
- Biostat HW 09MS009
- Exam 1
- Topic08. Simple Linear Reg
- Stats Lec7
- Effect of the Learning Support and the Use of Project Management Tools
- Intro to Uncertainty Analysis
- Regression - Solutions.pdf
- Indri Sas Fix
- J. Basic. Appl. Sci. Res., 1(7) 617-621, 2011
- Short Communication - Prediction of Intake in Dairy Cows Under Tropical Conditions JS 2014 (1)
- IRJET-Optimizing the Material Removal Rate and Surface Finish in Wedm Using Response Surface Methodology
- ChE253K HW Problem Bank -- 2-D Data Tools.rev03
- Estatística Adsorção
- Prediction of Leachate PH for Cement Paste Containing Pure Metal Compounds
- biostatistik 1
- Lect Demand Forecasting
- Chapra-Ch19Final
- Research Report
- 320C10
- Estatutos UTFSM 1972
- TEMARIOS 2° PRUEBA DE NIVEL (1)
- Ws 103822
- Roberts Schlenker AER
- Coherence and Elicitability
- Proyecto
- Expo
- Feyerabend, Paul - Tratado Contra El mEtodo [1975]
- me_3
- Stat 220 Notes
- Fina 1310
- Cert Amen Sol
- 09 Monte Negro
- Foucault Michel - Reflexiones Sobre El Saber, Poder, Verdad y Practicas de Si [Sicario Infernal]
- Apuntes Semana 1 (MAT275 2010-2)
- Borra 343
- Lineal 3
- El Bhagavad Gita
- u Br 0042004078
- 69787450 Manifiesto Asamblea General 1969
- Septiembre 2005

You are on page 1of 6

**In addition, several dynamic EVaR models have been developed in the recent
**

econometric literature and will be briefly reviewed in the next section. My contri-

bution is to suggest a simple asset allocation procedure that can be used to build

the optimal portfolio by minimizing risk as measured by the predicted EVaR.

6.2 Measuring downside risk: VaR and EVaR

6.2.1 Definition and properties

EVaR is introduced in Kuan, Yeh, and Hsu (2009) . The concept of ω -expectile,

for 0 Ͻ ω Ͻ 1, can be found in Newey and Powell (1987) . They defined µ ( ω ),

for any random variable Y with finite mean and cumulative distribution func-

tion F ( y ), as the solution of the equation:

µ ω

ω

ω

µ ω

µ ω

( ) ( ) ( ( )) ( )

( )

ϭ ϩ

Ϫ

Ϫ

Ϫ E Y y dF y

2 1

1

∞

∫

(6.1)

The ω -EVaR of Kuan et al. (2009) is just Ϫ µ ( ω ). Expression (6.1) can be

rearranged to give:

ω µ ω ω µ ω

µ ω

µ ω

( ( )) ( ) ( ) ( ( ) ) ( )

( )

( )

y dF y y dF y Ϫ ϭ Ϫ Ϫ

Ϫ

∞

∞

∫ ∫

1

The differences that appear in the integrals are nonnegative. When ω ϭ 0.5,

the solution is simply µ ( ω ) ϭ E ( Y ), while as ω varies between zero and 0.5,

the expectile function µ ( ω ) describes the lower tail of the distribution of Y .

Intuitively, the quantities ω and 1 Ϫ ω can be seen as asymmetric weights that

multiply the integrals of the deviations from µ ( ω ). If ω Ͻ 0.5, then the weight

on the outcomes y that lie below µ ( ω ) (i.e., the weight on the integral on the

right hand side) dominates.

It can be shown that a solution exists and it is unique. Furthermore, the

expectiles of a linear transformation of Y , Y * ϭ aY ϩ b can be easily found

since µ *( ω ) ϭ a µ ( ω ) ϩ b for any real numbers a and b .

Suppose that we have obtained a sample of n observations Y

i

. The sample

equivalent of the population expectile can be found by solving:

min

µ

ω

ρ µ ( ) Y

i

i

n

Ϫ

ϭ1

∑

(6.2)

where

ρ ω

ω

( ) | ( )| x I x x ϭ Ϫ < 0

2

Optimizing Optimization 146

In other words, we minimize the weighted squared deviations from the obser-

vations. Weights are asymmetric: if ω Ͻ 0.5 then negative residuals receive a

larger weight than positive residuals. When ω ϭ 0.5, the problem boils down to

minimizing the sum of squared errors, yielding the sample mean as the solution.

It is easy to show that VaR can be characterized as the value that minimizes

asymmetric absolute deviations instead of square deviations. The function

ρ

ω

( x ) is replaced by ρ

α

( x ) ϭ | α Ϫ I ( x Ͻ 0)| | x |, 0 Ͻ α Ͻ 1. As a consequence,

the difference between VaR and EVaR can be stated in terms of the shape of

the objective function in the optimization problem (6.2).

A fundamental property of expectiles, which follows from the first-order

conditions of the minimization problem, is that the weighted sum of residuals

is equal to zero:

| ( )|( ) ω µ µ Ϫ Ϫ Ϫ ϭ

ϭ

I Y Y

i i

i

n

1

0

∑

EVaR has several advantages. First, when expectiles exist, they characterize the

shape of the distribution just like quantiles. In fact, each ω -expectile corresponds

to an α -quantile, although the relation between ω and α varies from distribu-

tion to distribution, as can be seen from Table 6.1 . For example, a 5% EVaR

when returns are normally distributed corresponds to a 12.6% VaR. However,

for heavy tailed distributions like a t (5), the 5% EVaR corresponds to a 10%

VaR. If α is seen as an indication of how conservative the risk measure is, then it

can be seen that EVaR is more conservative when extreme losses are more likely.

A second advantage of EVaR is that it is a coherent measure of risk.

3

It also

admits an interpretation in terms of utility maximization. Manganelli (2007)

shows that an expectile can be seen as the expected utility of an agent having

asymmetric preferences on below target and above target returns. His argu-

ment is presented in more detail in the section on asset allocation. The resulting

portfolio allocations are not dominated in the second-order stochastic domi-

nance sense. In other words, a portfolio is second-order stochastic dominance

efficient if and only if it is optimal for some investor who is nonsatiable (i.e.,

the higher the profit, the better) and risk averse. It is interesting to note that

the mean – variance optimal portfolios do not satisfy this property: There may

3

It can be shown that EVaR satisfies all the properties required by the definition of Artzner et al.

(1999) , including monotonicity and subadditivity.

Table 6.1 α corresponding to ω when ω -EVaR and α -VaR are equal

ω Normal t (30) t (5) t (3)

1% 4.3% 4.0% 3.0% 2.4%

5% 12.6% 12.3% 10.0% 8.5%

10% 19.5% 19.0% 16.6% 14.5%

Staying ahead on downside risk 147

exist portfolios that would be chosen by all nonsatiable risk averse agents over

the mean – variance solution.

6.2.2 Modeling EVaR dynamically

Another notable advantage of expectiles is their mathematical tractability,

as argued in Newey and Powell (1987) . Dynamic expectile models have been

derived in Taylor (2008) , Kuan et al. (2009), and De Rossi and Harvey (2009) .

An early example appeared in Granger and Sin (2000) . Computationally, simple

univariate models compare favorably to GARCH or dynamic quantile models.

The analysis presented in this chapter is based on the dynamic model of De

Rossi and Harvey (2009) . Intuitively, their estimator produces a curve rather

than a single value µ , so that it can adapt to changes in the distribution over

time. The two parameters needed for the estimation are ω and q .

The former can be interpreted as a prudentiality level: the lower ω , the more

risk aversion. Figure 6.1 shows a typical expectile plot for alternative values of ω .

By decreasing ω , one focuses on values that are further out in the lower tail,

i.e., more severe losses.

By increasing q , we can make the model more flexible in adapting to the

observed data. The case q ϭ 0 corresponds to the constant expectile (estimated

by the sample expectile). As Figure 6.2 shows, larger values of q produce esti-

mated curves that follow more and more closely the observations.

0.04

0.02

0.00

R

e

t

u

r

n

–0.02

–0.04

1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008

Figure 6.1 Time-varying expectiles. The solid black lines represent estimated dynamic

expectiles for ω ϭ 0.05, 0.25, 0.5 (mean), 0.75, and 0.95.

Optimizing Optimization 148

De Rossi and Harvey (2009) assume that a time series y

t

, a risk tolerance

parameter 0 Ͻ ω Ͻ 1, and a signal to noise ratio q are given. They then decom-

pose each observation into its unobservable ω -expectile, µ

t

( ω ), and an error

term having ω -expectile equal to zero:

y

t t t

t t t

ϭ ϩ

ϭ ϩ

Ϫ

µ ω ε ω

µ ω µ ω η ω

( ) ( )

( ) ( ) ( )

1

The ω -expectile, µ

t

( ω ), is assumed to change over time following a (slowly

evolving) random walk that is driven by a normally distributed error term η

t

having zero mean.

4

In the special case, ω µ ϭ 0 5 5 . , (0. )

t

is just the time-varying

mean and therefore y

t

is a random walk plus noise. The signal µ

t

( . ) 0 5 can be

estimated via the Kalman filter and smoother (KFS).

4

The dynamics could be specified alternatively as following an autoregressive process or an inte-

grated random walk.

2

1

0

–1

2

1

0

–1

2

1

0

–1

2

1

0

–1

5 10 15 20

R

e

t

u

r

n

,

p

c

t

q = 0.1

5 10 15 20

R

e

t

u

r

n

,

p

c

t

q = 1

5 10 15 20

R

e

t

u

r

n

,

p

c

t

q = 10

5 10 15 20

R

e

t

u

r

n

,

p

c

t

q = 1000

Figure 6.2 Time-varying expectiles for alternative values of q. The data is a simulated

time series. The dotted line represents the sample 5% expectile, which corresponds to

the case q ϭ 0.

Staying ahead on downside risk 149

Equivalently , the problem can be cast in a nonparametric framework. The

goal is to find the optimal curve f ( t ), plotted in Figure 6.1 , that fits the obser-

vations. It is worth stressing that f ( t ) is a continuous function, so here the argu-

ment t , with a slight abuse of notation, is allowed to be a positive real number

such that 0 Ͻ t Ͻ T . The solution minimizes:

[ ( )] ( ( )) f t dt q y f s

s

s

T

T

’

2

1

0

ϩ Ϫ

ϭ

ρ

ω ∑

∫

(6.3)

with respect to the whole function f , within the class of functions having square

integrable first derivative. At any point t ϭ 1,..., T , we then set µ

t

( ω ) ϭ f ( t ).

The first term in Equation (6.3) is a roughness penalty . Loosely speaking,

the more the curve f ( t ) wiggles, the higher the penalty. The second term is the

objective function for the expectile, which as noted above gives asymmetric

weights on positive and negative errors.

The constant q represents the relative importance of the expectile criterion.

As q grows large, the objective function tends to become influenced less and

less by the squared first derivative. In the limit, only the errors y

t

Ϫ µ

t

( ω ) mat-

ter and the solution becomes µ

t

( ω ) ϭ y

t

, i.e., the estimated expectile coincides

with the corresponding observation. As q tends to zero, instead, the integral of

the squared derivative is minimized by a straight line. As a result, the solution

in the limit is to set all expectiles equal to the historical expectile. The role of q

is illustrated in Figure 6.2 .

It can be shown that the optimal curve is a piecewise linear spline.

Computationally, finding the optimal spline boils down to solving a nonlinear

system in µ , the vector of T expectiles. After some tedious algebra, the first-

order conditions to minimize Equation (6.3) turn out to be:

[ ( )] ( ) Ω µ µ µ ϩ ϭ D y D y y , ,

where D(y, µ ) is diagonal with element ( t , t ) given by

| ( )| ω µ Ϫ Ϫ I y

t t

< 0

and

Ω ϭ

Ϫ

Ϫ Ϫ

Ϫ Ϫ

Ϫ

Ϫ

Ϫ

q

1

1 1 0 0 0

1 2 1 0 0

0 1 2 1 0

0 2 1

0 1 1

…

…

…

…

…

Optimizing Optimization 150

Both Ω and D are T ϫ T matrices. Starting with an initial guess, µ

(1)

, the

optimal µ is found by iterating the equation:

µ Ω µ µ

( ) ( ) ( )

[ ( )] ( )

i i i ϩ Ϫ

ϭ ϩ

1 1

D y D y y , ,

until convergence. I define

ˆ

D y ( )

the matrix D upon convergence of µ

(

i

)

to ˆ µ .

The repeated inversion of the T ϫ T matrix in the formula can be efficiently

carried out by using the KFS.

5

To this end, it is convenient to set up an auxil-

iary linear state space form at each iteration:

y u

v

t t t

t t t

ϭ ϩ

ϭ ϩ

Ϫ

δ

δ δ

1

(6.4)

where

Var u I y

t t t

i

( ) /| ( )|

( )

ϭ Ϫ Ϫ 1 0 ω µ <

and

Var v q

t

( ) ϭ

The unobservable state δ

t

replaces µ

t

. The model in Equation (6.4) is just a

convenient device that can be used to carry out the computation efficiently. It

can be shown that the linear KFS applied to Equation (6.4) yields the optimal

µ characterized above.

The parameter q can be estimated from the data by cross-validation. The

method is very intuitive: It consists of dropping one observation at a time from

the sample and thus re-estimating the time-varying expectile with a missing

observation T times. The T residuals are then used to compute the objective

function:

CV q y

t t

t

t

T

ω ω

ρ µ ( ) ( )

( )

ϭ Ϫ

Ϫ

ϭ

1

∑

where µ

t

t ( ) Ϫ

is the estimated value at time t when y

t

is dropped. CV

ω

( q )

depends on q through the estimator

µ

t

t ( ) Ϫ

. De Rossi and Harvey (2006) devise a

computationally efficient method to minimize CV

ω

( q ) with respect to q .

6.3 The asset allocation problem

This section illustrates a method for finding, given a set of basic assets, the

portfolio with the lowest estimated risk — where risk is measured as EVaR. It is

5

The connection between spline smoothing and signal extraction in linear Gaussian systems has

been thoroughly investigated in the statistical literature. An early example is Wahba (1978) .

- Output Sgot Dan SgptUploaded bynurizalcure
- Censored Variables and Censored RegressionUploaded byStepan Abrahamyan
- Chapter 07 TbUploaded byAlmira
- General Attitude of College Students Towards Consequences and Impact of Television Advertising in BahrainUploaded bysanaafzal
- PSTAT122FinalPracSolutionsF16.pdfUploaded byAnonymous 2MXkfoDL2
- Group5_BestBuyUploaded byTran Pham
- MWD eg., Econometrics.docUploaded byOmen Protector
- Advanced Regression.pdfUploaded byfenriz666
- 00873859Uploaded byGrzegorz Kowal
- nmfsUploaded byapi-247567670
- What is Multiple Linear Regression.docxUploaded byKenneth June Rubio
- Biostat HW 09MS009Uploaded byaritraabir1910
- Exam 1Uploaded byHarish Sharma
- Topic08. Simple Linear RegUploaded byDavid Le
- Stats Lec7Uploaded byAsad Ali
- Effect of the Learning Support and the Use of Project Management ToolsUploaded byAlexander Decker
- Intro to Uncertainty AnalysisUploaded byRodrigo P. Silveira
- Regression - Solutions.pdfUploaded bywolfretonmaths
- Indri Sas FixUploaded byindriyani hasanah
- J. Basic. Appl. Sci. Res., 1(7) 617-621, 2011Uploaded byDamon Salvatore
- Short Communication - Prediction of Intake in Dairy Cows Under Tropical Conditions JS 2014 (1)Uploaded byRogelio Alfredo Utrilla Arellano
- IRJET-Optimizing the Material Removal Rate and Surface Finish in Wedm Using Response Surface MethodologyUploaded byIRJET Journal
- ChE253K HW Problem Bank -- 2-D Data Tools.rev03Uploaded byBao-Ngoc Hoang
- Estatística AdsorçãoUploaded byErivaldo Reis
- Prediction of Leachate PH for Cement Paste Containing Pure Metal CompoundsUploaded byyinglv
- biostatistik 1Uploaded bySalma
- Lect Demand ForecastingUploaded byHirenkumar Shah
- Chapra-Ch19FinalUploaded byChris Amoruso
- Research ReportUploaded bySaba M. Ali
- 320C10Uploaded byKara Mhisyella Assad

- Estatutos UTFSM 1972Uploaded byFelipe Pablo Velasquez Guerino
- TEMARIOS 2° PRUEBA DE NIVEL (1)Uploaded byFelipe Pablo Velasquez Guerino
- Ws 103822Uploaded byFelipe Pablo Velasquez Guerino
- Roberts Schlenker AERUploaded byFelipe Pablo Velasquez Guerino
- Coherence and ElicitabilityUploaded byFelipe Pablo Velasquez Guerino
- ProyectoUploaded byFelipe Pablo Velasquez Guerino
- ExpoUploaded byFelipe Pablo Velasquez Guerino
- Feyerabend, Paul - Tratado Contra El mEtodo [1975]Uploaded byFelipe Pablo Velasquez Guerino
- me_3Uploaded byFelipe Pablo Velasquez Guerino
- Stat 220 NotesUploaded byFelipe Pablo Velasquez Guerino
- Fina 1310Uploaded byFelipe Pablo Velasquez Guerino
- Cert Amen SolUploaded byFelipe Pablo Velasquez Guerino
- 09 Monte NegroUploaded byFelipe Pablo Velasquez Guerino
- Foucault Michel - Reflexiones Sobre El Saber, Poder, Verdad y Practicas de Si [Sicario Infernal]Uploaded byFelipe Pablo Velasquez Guerino
- Apuntes Semana 1 (MAT275 2010-2)Uploaded byFelipe Pablo Velasquez Guerino
- Borra 343Uploaded byFelipe Pablo Velasquez Guerino
- Lineal 3Uploaded byFelipe Pablo Velasquez Guerino
- El Bhagavad GitaUploaded byFelipe Pablo Velasquez Guerino
- u Br 0042004078Uploaded byFelipe Pablo Velasquez Guerino
- 69787450 Manifiesto Asamblea General 1969Uploaded byFelipe Pablo Velasquez Guerino
- Septiembre 2005Uploaded byFelipe Pablo Velasquez Guerino