You are on page 1of 4

9/12/2014 Learning to DO: The Jacobian: Finite Element Mesh Quality 1/4
Friday, August 10, 2012
The Jacobian: Finite Element Mesh Quality
This is as technical as engineering comes. Bring up a Jacobian to a bunch of finite element
engineers and hopefully they will all know what you are talking about. This is so technical that it
it typically only covered in senior level college classes or graduate school classes. Although, if
you do cover it in college you will probably do the actual matrix equations, even though in real life
(the business world) a computer does it in fractions of a second.
Now more specifically the Jacobian, which is short for the Jacobian Matrix Determinate, is really
the best measure of finite element mesh quality. It is one number which defines how good or bad
an element is. The Jacobian is a measure of the normals of the element faces relative to each
other. Unfortunately, Hypermesh does not show the element face normals on solid elements, but
it is basically an arrow on each face pointing out perpendicular to the face. The range of
a Jacobian is from 1, a perfect cube, to something lower, -1 or even lower. The smallest Jacobian
I have seen was -1.45. When the element face normals start to cross, that is they are not
perpendicular to each other, your element quality gets worse.
For several examples I created the image below. In all of the elements, except for the red one, I
simply translated one node (vertex) to a new location and kept the other seven in the original
cube positions. You can see that as the node moves farther away from the cube position the
element quality gets worse.
How bad is bad? Abaqus will not run a job with a Jacobian below 0, at least not for me. Ansys on
the other hand has less strict mesh quality requirements. Often times Abaqus will not run a solid
element Jacobian below 0.2 and a shell element Jacobian below 0.3. And yes, I have had one
element with a negative Jacobian prevent an Abaqus job with over 100,000 elements from
running. If you can get all of the Jacobians in your model above .5 you can typically say you have
a good quality mesh.
If you liked this click on something below or leave a comment, please. I can do more like this,
Sample Jacobians (J): Orange Cube J = 1.0; Blue J = .942 (z is .9 f or one point); Purple J = .883 (z and y are .9 f or
one point); Pink J = .398 (z and y are .5 f or one point); Green J = -.409 (z and y are -.1 f or one point); Tan J =
-.130 (z and y are .1 f or one point); Red J = 1.0 (z is 3 f or all f our end points); Light Blue J = .072 (x y and z are .5
f or one point)
Another reason I blog? Writing can
communicate more clearly:…
Isaiah Janzen
Show Summary
Maintenance last 3 years $2400 (this +
tires, shocks, 2-3 oil changes) + $450 for a
new radiator tomorrow. $2900 tot.
Isaiah Janzen
Show Photo
Event of the evening, radiator leak
Isaiah Janzen
Show Photo
I've been doing something crazy after I
run lately. Eating real fruit. Not some
processed syrup, actual fruit. I've had a
good summer.
Isaiah Janzen
Isaiah Janzen
10 Sep
10 Sep
9 Sep
9 Sep
8 Sep
Tweet to @IsaiahJanzen
My Microblog
Abaqus: Bottom-up mesh example
The Jacobian: Finite Element Mesh Quality
Abaqus: Create Animations
Ansys: The Pinball Region
I Cut the Cord in 2011.
My "Next" Adventure, and The Things I'm Not
Abaqus: How to Reduce the Size of your .stt
Seven Most Popular Posts This Week


Next Blog» Create Blog

Sign In
9/12/2014 Learning to DO: The Jacobian: Finite Element Mesh Quality 2/4
Posted by Isaiah at 8:43 AM
Labels: abaqus, engineering, f inite element
Helpf ul/inf ormative? Yes (6) No (0)
but only if there is demand.
+5 Recommend this on Google
Damien Mesh April 25, 2013 at 12:01 PM
Hi, thx for this article, I always wonder what was this quality criterion because element with the
same jacobian could have different shapes.
jade2009 May 29, 2013 at 3:38 PM
very good article
Anonymous July 17, 2013 at 10:16 AM
Thanks for the article. It is simple,clear and to the point.
Richard Smith August 14, 2013 at 10:42 PM
Love it.
Earl Finnegan September 25, 2013 at 1:16 PM
Wow it seems finite element analysis is a bit over my head at the moment, I'll have to start a
bit simpler.
well wishers September 28, 2013 at 3:02 AM
it is really good explanation, simple to understand, great work...
Bryan Osornio October 23, 2013 at 9:39 AM
very simple explanation, perfect information, thank you!
n3l3 November 19, 2013 at 8:01 AM
vishnu p December 25, 2013 at 11:50 PM
what happens if jocobain fails in analysis results
Alireza Afshani May 20, 2014 at 12:12 AM
nice article
Ayatullah Khomeni June 12, 2014 at 9:51 PM
But how to see this jacobian value in abaqus??
abaqus art bicycling book
Broad Peak business buying and
selling a stock climb coaching
colorado company competition documentary
economics week
engineering finite element I live in Iowa
innovation investing It's Not Rocket
Science janzen gear learning life life of a
contract engineer marathon marketing
money mountaineering pakistan
product race relationships
running science start-up
successful innovative
companies sustanability team
unemployment unemployment
chronicles value workout WPI writing
ansys Athletic Republic
carabi ner
ebook Election 2012 energy
parents rope soloing
space squi doo
strage innovation awards
tip of the day tip of
the week
Search This Blog
► 2014 (174)
► 2013 (282)
▼ 2012 (222)
► December (21)
► November (21)
► October (20)
► September (17)
▼ August (16)
Finite Element Art
Finally Down to Skim Milk
I Live in Iowa: Week 71
Non-Linear Productivity
Doesn't Everybody?
I Live in Iowa: Week 70
Between Autocracy and Autonomy
Our Climb of Devils Tower
Never Enough?...
I Live in Iowa: Week 69
The Jacobian: Finite Element Mesh
Time Independent Education!!
I Live in Iowa: Week 68
The Cure for Plantar Fasciitis and The
Cure for Sh...
Buying and Selling a Stock: Part 6
That Can Happen?
► July (22)
► June (22)
► May (16)
► April (15)
► March (14)
► February (19)
► January (19)
► 2011 (204)
► 2010 (202)
► 2009 (196)
Blog Archive
Subscribe To:
9/12/2014 Learning to DO: The Jacobian: Finite Element Mesh Quality 3/4
Newer Post Older Post Home
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)
Enter your comment...
Comment as:
Google Account

Create a Link
Links to this post
Iowa is now my tenth US state to live in after
California, Ohio, Missouri, Oklahoma, Kansas,
Massachusetts, New Mexico, Colorado and
Wisconsin. I have a B.S. in Aerospace
Engineering and an M.S. in Materials Science
and Engineering from Worcester Polytechnic
Institute (WPI). I am currently employed by a
leading manufacturer of construction and
forestry equipment to do structures design
engineering. I used to have a patent pending for
an ice axe I designed and tried to market, but
failed at that business that time. I am a serious
runner with a 32:12 10k PR and 2:30:20
marathon PR. I enjoy mountain climbing
including ascents of the Diamond on Longs
Peak and reaching 7000 meters (and spending
the night) on Broad Peak. In April 2014 I was
attempting Mt. Everest without supplemental
oxygen, when 16 people died in an avalanche,
and the rest of us went home. My Christian faith
in God is extremely important to me.
These are the endeavors I pursue. These are
the experiences I have. Leave here better than
you came.
Disclaimer: All views expressed on this website
are my own. I am not speaking on behalf of any
company or other person. Sometimes I am
sarcastic or exagerate, and those comments
should not be taken as the truth. Sometimes I
express frustration with a situation, which is my
way of recognizing and thus improving the
areas of my life where I fail, not to defame,
covet, or speak poorly of any other person.
About Me
2013 Dubuque Benefit Classic
Winning a Half Marathon as a Vegan
Follow this link to see my most recent location!
Track Me with Delorme GPS
Contact Isaiah Janzen
My Platform:
Total Pageviews
9/12/2014 Learning to DO: The Jacobian: Finite Element Mesh Quality 4/4
Simple template. Powered by Blogger.