You are on page 1of 5

Page 1 of 5

Roy G. Callahan, USN, Ret.

1529 NW 143
Gainesville, Florida 32606
Tel: (352) 332-9144
Fax: (352) 332-9144

Representative Ted Yoho
511 Cannon House Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20515

Dear Ted:

if the Constitution means anything. Congress keeps proving it is a corrupt and criminal organization by ac-
tion and deed. Your recent Celebrating America is not going to fix the problem. Consequently, your fellow
Floridians and constituents continue to suffer at the hands of crooked politicians, attorneys, judges, bu-
reaucrats and the courts, something we sent you to congress to correct using the Constitution and the oath,
you took to defend it as your guide. One of your constituents, Terry Trussell, is the most recent and identifi-
able victim of the ongoing criminal conspiracy to transform and destroy this Constitutional representative
republic. He is currently incarcerated in the Dixie County Jail.

Florida is a common law state but since 1968, corrupted administrative law
has attempted to usurp and
trump the constitution. Since then it has been a mix because the Florida Supreme Court gave way to the
legislature allowing the creation of the tyrannical administrative state Floridians live in today. (See * At-

Terry and I have long known Florida is a rife with corruption. Proof of this corruption is evident in the State
of Floridas 19
Statewide Grand Jury report 09-1910 dated December 17, 2010 (Case No. SC-09-1910).
Politicians, public officials and the courts have ignored this report. Save the independent common law
grand jury system the state has replaced with a statutory/corporate substitute, there is no way to hold Flori-
das elected and appointed jack wads accountable other than the bullet. Its obvious the ballot box isnt
working too well which is why the founders gave Americans the Second Amendment.

In April 2014, Dixie County summoned Terry Trussell for jury duty He was surprised to learn he was a
member of a statutorily created Dixie County Grand Jury where he became the foreman. He was also sur-
prised to hear State Attorney Jeffery Siegmeister tell him and his fellow jurors not to worry because their
services will not be needed unless there was a murder.

Administrative law is extra-legal in that it binds Americans not through law but through other mechanisms-not
through statutes but through regulations-and not through the decisions of courts but through other adjudications
It is supra-legal in that it requires judges to put aside their independent judgment and defer to administrative
power as if it were above the law-which our judges do far more systematically than even the worst of 17
English judges. And it is consolidated in that it combines the three power of government-legislative, executive, and
judicial-in administrative agencies.

Page 2 of 5

Terry did his homework. He researched and read the Florida Statutes to familiarize himself with the re-
quirements of his newfound position. He also read the Florida Grand Jury handbook. Some but not all of
the statutes, he familiarized himself with follow:

FS 905.16 Duties of grand jury.The grand jury shall inquire into every offense triable within the
county for which any person has been held to answer, If an indictment has not been found or an in-
formation or affidavit filed for the offense, and all other indictable offenses triable within the county
that are presented to it by the state attorney or her or his designated assistant or otherwise come
to its knowledge.
905.165 Grand jury to make presentments.the grand jury may make presentments for offenses
against the criminal laws, whether or not specific punishment is provided for the offense.
905.19 Duty of state attorney.The state attorney or an assistant state attorney shall attend ses-
sions of the grand jury to examine witnesses and give legal advice about any matter cognizable by
the grand jury. The state attorney may designate one or more assistant state attorneys to accom-
pany and assist the state attorney in the performance of her or his duties, or the state attorney may
designate one or more assistant state attorneys to attend sessions, examine witnesses, and give
legal advice to the grand jury. The state attorney or an assistant state attorney shall draft indict-
905.20 Duty of grand juror having knowledge of offense.A grand juror who knows or has rea-
son to believe that an indictable offense triable within the county has been committed shall report
the information to the grand jury and may be sworn as a witness in the investigation.
Terry had a sworn duty as foreman to bring any criminal complaints he became aware of to the attention of the Dixie
County Grand Jury. When Terry learned about criminal activity of Dixie County Public Officers and State officials re-
garding the deployment of Common Core (Communist Core) curriculum into the public schools, where after money
was paid the agreement was made to change the curriculum before the new curriculum was published, Terry brought
this complaint of official wrongdoing (bribery) before the Grand Jury.

When Terry brought the complaint to the Grand Jury, third circuit state attorney Siegmeister breached multiple stat-
utes by interfering with the official work for the Foreman. He manipulated the jury thereby tainting it.

Terry documented the events by filing the evidence in the form of a Bill of Information into the public record He also
wrote a letter to Judge Munkittrick, the presiding judge who empaneled the Grand Jury. As a result, Terry was duty
bound to bring forward two criminal complaints: one regarding the communist core curriculum and the other regard-
ing Jeffery Siegmeisters criminal and illegal behavior.

Terry knew Siegmeisters criminal behavior tainted this sitting grand jury; he also knew Florida is a Common Law
state so he set up a meeting with the people of Dixie County to ask if they wanted to reestablish their constitutionally
guaranteed Common Law Grand Jury. The people voted to move forward.

The Common Law Grand Jury was renamed The Peoples Grand Jury Under Common Law in Dixie County and con-
vened to consider the two criminal complaints. They handed down two True Bills of Presentment, which meant that
they believe enough evidence exists to require investigation into both issues. Two True Bills were entered into the
public record.

Page 3 of 5

Interviews by members of the Florida Department of Law Enforcement (FDLE), made it clear Terry was under attack
because he did his duty as Grand Jury Foreman. The judicial system and FDLE has made a systematic effort to en-
gineer a cover-up of Siegmeisters crimes. Because the Grand Jury voted two true bills of presentment, Terry was
charged with 10 felonies for simulating a legal process. Terry did nothing wrong; he just did what he was duty sworn
to do yet conviction carries 70 years in prison The evidence clearly shows he DID NOT simulate a legal process.

On September 2
, Terry was arrested and jailed on a flawed affidavit. Judge Hankinson issued an order, and war-
rant for the arrest of TERRY GEORGE TRUSSELL. A Void Judgment True Bill was drafted and filing was attempted
in both Dixie County Court Clerk Office as well as with the Court Clerk in Perry (seat of the Circuit Court where Judge
Hankinson is assigned), Both clerks refused to file legal papers in Terrys defense. It was also discovered that the
Dixie County Clerk of Court, Dana Johnson, removed, altered, or had removed and altered, official paperwork that
Terry had filed previously into the public record.

On October 9, Terry was present for his 10:00 AM arraignment at the Dixie Court House. At 9:30 A.M, a deputy sher-
iff delivered a 3-page document to Terry telling him the Judge stated if Terry wanted to speak at his own arraignment,
he would be required to sign the document. Terry knew if he signed this document, he was giving up his constitution-
ally protected right to a trial by a jury of his peers. He declined to sign it.

In the courtroom at 10:00 AM, Judge Hankinson asked, Is Terry George Trussell here, and if yes, please step for-
ward. Terry was sitting in the courtroom. He stood up and in a clear voice and said I am here to speak on this mat-
ter. The Judge responded with a question Are you Terry George Trussell? Terry began to respond but the judge,
speaking over Terry, once again, asked Is Terry George Trussell here? Once again, Terry responded affirmatively.
The Judge ignored Terrys response a second time. Finally, the Judge asked once again. Terry responded, For the
record, I am here to speak on that matter.

The Judge then said, Let the record show that Terry George Trussell has not appeared. He ordered his arrest for
failure to appear while also spending his bond. Terry answered in a very clear and loud voice, I object! I am here.
The Sheriff Deputies took Terry by his arms, walked him out of the courtroom, handcuffed him, and took him to jail.

There are 26 signed, sworn, and notarized affidavits from people who witnessed the events in Judge Hankinsons
courtroom. The audio link to this court proceeding is here.

The Florida Grand Jury Handbook says a Grand Jury Foreman has complete immunity for his actions ex-
cept in the case where he testifies as a witness for the grand jury as to a commission of a crime and that
testimony is perjured; then the juror can be prosecuted for perjury.
Floridas Grand Jury laws contravene their federal counterparts as seen in U.S. v Williams. 504 U.S.
36 (112 S.Ct. 1735, 118 L.Ed.2d 352) a seen below.
In the Williams decision the court said
The Grand Jurys relationship with the judicial branch has been at arm's length. Terry knew the
Judges' direct involvement in the functioning of the grand jury is confined to the constitutive one of
calling the grand jurors together and administering their oaths of office. See United States v. Cal-
andra, 414 U.S. 338, 343, 94 S.Ct. 613, 617, 38 L.Ed.2d 561 (1974); Fed.Rule Crim.Proc. 6(a).this
being the case, Judge Hankinson dishonored judicial canons and the court by protecting his out of
control State Attorney Jeffrey Siegmeister. The Florida Supreme Court aided abetted this process

Page 4 of 5

when Justice Labarga stuck his two cents into a situation that was already handled by Governor
Terry also knew the grand jury's functional independence from the judicial branch is evident both in
the scope of its power to investigate criminal wrongdoing, and in the manner in which that power is
exercised. "Unlike a court, whose jurisdiction is predicated upon a specific case or controversy, the
grand jury 'can investigate merely on suspicion that the law is being violated, or even because it
wants assurance that it is not.' " United States v. R. Enterprises, 498 U.S. ----, ----, 111 S.Ct. 722,
726, 112 L.Ed.2d 795 (1991) (quoting United States v. Morton Salt Co., 338 U.S. 632, 642-643, 70
S.Ct. 357, 364, 94 L.Ed. 401 (1950)). It need not identify the offender it suspects, or even "the pre-
cise nature of the offense" it is investigating. Blair v. United States, 250 U.S. 273, 282, 39 S.Ct.
468, 471, 63 L.Ed. 979 (1919). The grand jury requires no authorization from its constituting court
to initiate an investigation, see Hale, supra, 201 U.S., at 59-60, 65, 26 S.Ct., at 373, 375, nor does
the prosecutor require leave of court to seek a grand jury indictment.
Terry knew the grand jury has wide latitude to investigate violations of law as it deems ap-
propriate and need not obtain permission from either the court or the prosecutor. See, e.g.,
id., at 343, 94 S.Ct., at 617; Costello v. United States, 350 U.S. 359, 362, 76 S.Ct. 406, 408, 100
L.Ed. 397 (1956); Hale v. Henkel, 201 U.S. 43, 65, 26 S.Ct. 370, 375, 50 L.Ed. 652 (1906). Corre-
spondingly, we have acknowledged that "its operation generally is unrestrained by the technical
procedural and evidentiary rules governing the conduct of criminal trials.
Terrys incarceration is not the result of a true bill from a grand jury required by the Fifth Amendment: When
juxtaposed to 905.19 above, it is obvious Terry is a political prisoner; he violated no law. Judge
Hankinsons actions were arbitrary, capricious; and unlawful if the Fifth Amendment means anything
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a
presentment or indictment of a Grand J ury, except in cases arising in the land or naval
forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall
any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor
shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived
of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be tak-
en for public use, without just compensation

Furthermore, when looked at objectively one realizes part of the problem lays with the profession it-
self and Congresses refusal to enforce in Article 1, Section 9, clause which reads
; No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no Person holding any Office of
Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present,
Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince or foreign State. \

The word esquire is a title of nobility that comes from the .BAR, which defined means British Accreditation
Registry, a foreign entity that we fought a revolutionary war over and the constitution prohibits. A circuit
court in Clark County, Nevada dealt with the issue of the missing 13th Amendment proving the amendment
existed but was never repealed. Tolerance and preplanned public ignorance via public education allows

Page 5 of 5

this class to rule, pillage, and destroy this constitutional republic. The record shows the American Bar and
many of its members are guilty of misprision of treason;; they are vigorously aiding and abetting the imple-
mentation of Agenda 21, the UN program which you told me was the raison dtre making you decide to
run for office.

I am a retired Cuban Missile Crisis and Vietnam Veteran. I am also a retired Public defender criminal inves-
tigator. I upheld my constitutional oath life long, including the 20 years I worked in the criminal injustice sys-
tem I use this term because the statutory legal system is a meat market having nothing to do with liberty or
justice. Common law requires a victim
statutory, commercial and admiralty courts do not. Numbers and
groupthink have nothing to do with justice. Lets make a deal is the name of the game.

I understand you and Jeffrey Siegmeister are buds. I hope that a political relationship that takes a back
seat to justice and the Constitution. I trust you will set aside your friendship with a criminal to assist an
American who he falsely accused and incarcerated.

Generations of Americans have fought and died for this country. They served something greater than
themselves, an experience few politicians know anything about. Terry is one of those Americans. You are
on record stating, While serving our nation, veterans were held accountable. They deserve no less from
their government It is time for your actions speak louder than words.

Looking forward to your reply, I remain

Yours in the bill of Rights,

Roy G. Callahan
Cuban Missile Crisis/Vietnam Veteran
Retired Investigator, Public Defenders Office, 8
Judicial Circuit

The state cannot be the victim