Section: Personal Statements

Personal Statement to Former U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder
To:
Cc:
From:
Dated:

Eric Holder
<withheld at this time>
Randy Chapel
Nov 8, 2014 (v1)

When is a wrong, a wrong Eric?
Did slavery become wrong because of the 13th Amendment (December 6, 1865), OR was slavery wrong from the
moment men traveled to distant lands, ransacked villages, tore families apart, killed, destroyed and took whomever
they wanted to ship off to yet other distant lands to be treated as animals? Tell me Eric, when was slavery wrong?
How about this, when did segregation in education become wrong? On May 17, 1954 due to Brown v. Board of
Education, 347 U.S. 483 (1954), OR was it wrong from the moment it was contrived that “equivalent” education
that separated students based on color was somehow equal? Tell me Eric, when was educational segregation, if not
segregation itself wrong?
Perhaps a more modern example –
When did banning same-sex marriage become a wrong? On June 26, 2013 due to Hollingsworth v. Perry, 133 S. Ct.
2652 (2013), OR was it wrong from the moment a group of people contrived to single out a segment of the
population in blunt discrimination?
When is a wrong, a wrong?
It is easy now to look through the periscope of history and observe -- of course slavery is wrong, of course
segregation is wrong (in all its forms) and of course singling out a group of people based on sexual orientation is
wrong. But know this, when there were slaves, when there was segregation, when LGBT were being discriminated
against, people existed that knew it was wrong – and they were not all African Americans or LGBT. Because Eric,
people can use basic reasoning to know something is wrong when it is.
Would slavery been a right, if the South won and forced their views on the North?
Would segregation be a right if the thirteen Topeka parents on behalf of their twenty children failed to make their
case and people like George Wallace and others continued on with their segregation mantra560?
Would blunt discrimination against various LGBT groups in California or in any other state be right if Perry had
failed?
When is a wrong, a wrong Eric? Tell us all Eric; you are the former U.S. Attorney General.
Define wrong for America.
Conversely, does a wrong become a right due to fate, chance, or who is the victor? Because a victor declares a
wrong a right, thus it no longer a wrong? OR is a wrong, wrong because it is a wrong?
Is there a threshold that defines inalienable or sacrosanct wrong? A wrong, so wrong, that it is unimpeachable?
Had Nazism561 or Fascism562 563 won over and against the Allies, would that had made the positions taken by the
Axis leaders right? None of the gains our men and women of color have experienced since WWII would have been

560
For a modern thematic usage of segregation symbolism, compare Suzanne Collins The Hunger Games’ not-so-subtle usage of President Snow
“Panem today, Panem tomorrow, Panem forever” to George Wallace’s “Segregation now, segregation tomorrow, segregation forever.”
561
Used here as a racist and antisemitic ideology which holds that the Aryan race is superior to all other races. Government promotes Aryan race.

Government Corruption and Educational Fraud

176

www.educationalfraud.com

Section: Personal Statements

made had the world fallen to Nazism. For one, you would not have the job you do; may not have even existed,564
and three, it would have been completely inconceivable to have Obama as President.
You think the Ferguson Police are screwed up? Do you have any idea what the Nazis would have done
in America? Any idea Eric?
No Jews; No LGBT; No Perry; No Martin Luther King; No Rosa Parks; No Brown; No NAACP; No
Freedom Riders; No Obama, … no you.
The life we have here today, the one we are still struggling to make better for all, is the life born on the
backs and paid with blood, of men and women who died and/or refused to give up regardless of what
they were put through. We are the descendants of people that won over absolute wrong, yet there are
still wrongs that must be confronted from within our own society.
I fought not to be apart of the government corruption and educational fraud of the Religious, and Justice beat the
crap out of me for doing so. I did not just fight Western Seminary, et al, I fought you – the Obama Administration
representing the United States of America and your litigation strategy (28 U.S.C. §§ 516, 519) to enforce, enable
and forever perpetuate corruption for schools, accreditation agencies and the federal government.
“The Department of Justice is the only cabinet department named for an ideal. And this is actually
appropriate, because our work is both aspirational and grounded in gritty reality; it is both ennobling and
profoundly challenging…”
- Designated nominee for U.S. Attorney General, U.S. Attorney Loretta Lynch
The Gritty Reality … you obstructed justice and abused power and now you are running away
1.

Department of Education, Office of Inspector General warned of failures to document, control, and
investigate by the AAEU in 2003565; demonstrated by the vacuous Margaret Spellings and her department in
2007-2008; covered up by Arne Duncan et al and DOJ et al. 2009-, I had to force the Obama Administration
to admit or deny documentation concerning the government’s position. See Chapel v. United States
Department of Education, California Northern District Case: 5:2011cv04344.
FOIA Request (11-01901-F)
#28: The ATS “exception”
policy in effect on March 14,
2006

Response of the United States
The Department determined
that it has no records
responsive to request.

#29 The ATS 34 CFR §
602.22 policy in effect on
March 14, 2006

The Department determined
that it has no records
responsive to request.

Reason for Request
Known since Dec 2006 by USDE;
admitted publicly by USDE; regulations
require policies are written. See also
A09C0014, 20 US Code § 1099b doesn’t
empower accreditation agencies authority
over U.S. Constitution, state constitutions,
federal or state laws, decisional cases.
Known since Dec 2006 by USDE;
admitted publicly by USDE; regulations
require policies are written. See also
A09C0014, See also Charles Willard’s
admission to Carol Nye-Wilson that ATS
doesn’t use Substantive Change; ATS had
no §602.22 policy; See also Chuck

562

Used here as an ideology of anti-democracy. The state is absolute and totalitarian and all citizens must follow the state.
Nazism and Fascism (fascism) are not the same. Nazism includes Fascism, but Fascism is not necessarily national-socialist in scope.
564
Simone Gigliotti, Berel Lang. The Holocaust: a reader. Malden, Massachusetts, USA; Oxford, England, UK; Carlton, Victoria, Australia:
Blackwell Publishing, 2005. Pp. 14. Blacks were socially isolated. Blacks existed at the bottom of the racial scale. Blacks were segregated to be
eventually, exterminated through compulsory sterilization. As for Obama, a mixed-race child, he would have been considered a bastard by the
Nazi and potentially forced to undergo sterilization as a child, if he had even been born at all.
565
Audit: A09C0014, dated: 7/23/2003, Office of Postsecondary Education, Accrediting Agency Evaluation Unit's Review of Selected
Accrediting Agency Standards and Procedures.
563

www.educationalfraud.com

177

Government Corruption and Educational Fraud

Section: Personal Statements

#30 The ATS 34 CFR §
602.22 policy in effect on
August 29, 2008
#31 The current ATS 34 CFR
§ 602.22 policy
#32: The NWCCU “exception”
policy in effect on March 14,
2006

The Department determined
that it has no records
responsive to request.
The Department determined
that it has no records
responsive to request.
The Department determined
that it has no records
responsive to request.

#33 The NWCCU 34 CFR §
602.22 policy in effect on
March 14, 2006

The Department determined
that it has no records
responsive to request.

#34 The NWCCU 34 CFR §
602.22 policy in effect on
August 29, 2008
#35 The NWCCU 34 CFR §
602.22 policy

The Department determined
that it has no records
responsive to request.
The Department determined
that it has no records
responsive to request.
The Department determined
that it has no records
responsive to request.

#56 The ATS standards or
procedures that override Mary
R. v. B. & R. Corp., 149 Cal.
App. 3d 308 (1983) as of
March 14, 2006

#57 The NWCCU standards or
procedures that override Mary
R. v. B. & R. Corp., 149 Cal.
App. 3d 308 (1983) as of
March 14, 2006
#58 The ATS “exception”
standards or policies in which
schools have a business
practice of overriding the law
as of 1999
#59 All records between the
Department and ATS
concerning standards or
procedures for exceptions
since 1999
#60 All ATS standards or
procedures that give ATS

Government Corruption and Educational Fraud

The Department determined
that it has no records
responsive to request.

Mula’s admission to myself and Kevin
Ford on ATS and NWCCU lack of
policies; See also cover up claims by
Nancy C. Reagon, Cheryl Oldham under
the direction of Margaret Spellings.
See above.
See above.
Known since Dec 2006 by USDE;
admitted publicly by USDE; regulations
require policies are written. See also
A09C0014, 20 US Code § 1099b doesn’t
empower accreditation agencies authority
over U.S. Constitution, state constitutions,
federal or state laws, decisional cases.
See also A09C0014, NWCCU modified
their §602.22 policy for Western
Seminary and obstructed justice in the
process; See also 34 C.F.R. §602.15(a)(6)
See above.
See above.
Non-disclosure of child molestation is "a
serious breach of professional conduct"
and "serious criminal acts." Id. at 315 is
contrary to public policy, including the
covering up of all materials/discovery
associated. See also A09C0014. See also
20 US Code § 1099b doesn’t empower
accreditation agencies authority over U.S.
Constitution, state Constitutions, federal
or state laws, decisional cases;
See above.

The Department determined
that it has no records
responsive to request.

See above.

The Department determined
that it has no records
responsive to request.

See above.

The Department determined
that it has no records

See above.

178

www.educationalfraud.com

Section: Personal Statements

authority over March 14, 2006
settlement agreement
involving Randy Chapel and
Western Seminary
#61 All ATS standards or
procedures that give NWCCU
authority over March 14, 2006
settlement agreement
involving Randy Chapel and
Western Seminary
#62 All Department records
concerning ATS’ review of the
March 14, 2006 settlement
agreement involving Randy
Chapel and Western Seminary.
#63 All Department records
concerning NWCCU’s review
of the March 14, 2006
settlement agreement
involving Randy Chapel and
Western Seminary
#64 All Department records
involving General Counsel
decisions concerning the
March 14, 2006 settlement
agreement involving Randy
Chapel and Western Seminary

responsive to request.

#65 The settlement agreement
involving Randy Chapel and
Western Seminary that
provides ATS has authority to
make determinations regarding
the settlement agreement or
the validly of the settlement
agreement.
#66 The settlement agreement
involving Randy Chapel and
Western Seminary that
provides NWCCU has
authority to make
determinations regarding the
settlement agreement or the
validly of the settlement
agreement.
#67 Records of any ATS
policies that gives schools
authority to exceed or waive
State law.
#68 Records of any ATS
policies that gives schools
authority to exceed or waive

The Department determined
that it has no records
responsive to request.

www.educationalfraud.com

The Department determined
that it has no records
responsive to request.

See above. 20 US Code § 1099b doesn’t
empower accreditation agencies authority
to enable other accreditation agencies.

The Department determined
that it has no records
responsive to request.

A09C0014.

The Department determined
that it has no records
responsive to request.

See above

The Department determined
that it has no records
responsive to request.

A09C0014. See also 20 U.S.C. § 1232g;
34 CFR Part 99; Section 504 of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 18 U.S.C. §
1001, Internal Revenue Code, et al.; CA
Penal Code Sections 647.6, 11165; CA
Penal Code Section 134; CA BPC §
17200. Congress (and State) has provided
no authority to accreditation agencies (20
US Code § 1099b) [or to schools] to
supersede law or decisional cases.
See above and See also Section 11(a)
binding arbitration.

The Department determined
that it has no records
responsive to request.

See above

The Department determined
that it has no records
responsive to request.

A09C0014. Congress has provided no
authority to accreditation agencies (20 US
Code § 1099b) to supersede law or
decisional cases.
See above.

The Department determined
that it has no records
responsive to request.

179

Government Corruption and Educational Fraud

Section: Personal Statements

decisional cases.
#69 Records of any ATS
policies that gives schools
authority to exceed or waive
FERPA.
#70 Records of any ATS
policies that gives schools
authority to exceed or waive
Federal law.
#71 Records of any NWCCU
policies that gives schools
authority to exceed or waive
State law.
#73 Records of any NWCCU
policies that gives schools
authority to exceed or waive
decisional cases.
#73566 Records of any
NWCCU policies that gives
schools authority to exceed or
waive FERPA.
#74 Records of any NWCCU
policies that gives schools
authority to exceed or waive
Federal law.
#75 Records that give Western
Seminary authority to exceed
or waive State law.

#76 Records that give Western
Seminary authority to exceed
or waive decisional cases.
#77 Records that give Western
Seminary authority to exceed
or waive FERPA.
#78 Records that give Western
Seminary authority to exceed
or waive Federal law.

566

The Department determined
that it has no records
responsive to request.

See above.

The Department determined
that it has no records
responsive to request.

See above. See also Barker v. Riverside
County Office of Education, No. 07-56313
(9th Cir. Oct. 23, 2009)

The Department determined
that it has no records
responsive to request.

A09C0014. Congress has provided no
authority to accreditation agencies (20 US
Code § 1099b) to supersede law or
decisional cases.
See above.

The Department determined
that it has no records
responsive to request.
The Department determined
that it has no records
responsive to request.

See above.

The Department determined
that it has no records
responsive to request.

See above. See also Barker v. Riverside
County Office of Education, No. 07-56313
(9th Cir. Oct. 23, 2009)

The Department determined
that it has no records
responsive to request.

School fall under the control of Federal,
State and accreditation agencies in
various forms, none of which provide that
schools have the power to exceed or
waive the law or decisional cases by
themselves. See also Barker v. Riverside
County Office of Education, No. 07-56313
(9th Cir. Oct. 23, 2009)
See above.

The Department determined
that it has no records
responsive to request.
The Department determined
that it has no records
responsive to request.
The Department determined
that it has no records
responsive to request.

See above.
See above.

a.

I even went so far as to correctly point out to James A. Scharf, Obama, Duncan, Phil Rosenfelt,
Kathleen Tighe and you on Sept 14, 2011 there would be no records because it is totally insane
that a school or an accreditation agency has more power than all three branches of government,
each of the 50 states, any court and the civil rights of any American.

b.

In spite of this, the litigation strategy (28 U.S.C. §§ 516, 519) you are responsible for placed
government cover up as the primary focus of the Obama Administration, supporting at all costs
the failures of the scandal-plagued Department of Education, ATS et al., NWCCU et al. and
Western Seminary et al. while causing as much irreparable damage to my family and me.

This was an error in the numbering of the FOIA request.

Government Corruption and Educational Fraud

180

www.educationalfraud.com

Section: Personal Statements

2.

In spite of the fact that 20 US Code § 1099b provides no authority for accreditation agencies to supersede the
U.S. Constitution, state constitutions, federal or state laws or decisional cases, the litigation strategy (28
U.S.C. §§ 516, 519) conducted with your knowledge supported ATS’ various vacuous claims that “IT” was
the final authority and not the court – a corruption of the intent of Congress and Courts nation wide and the
decisional case of Thomas M. Cooley Law School case (Thomas M. Cooley Law School v. The American Bar
Association, et al. W.D. Mich., Case No. 1:04-cv-00221-DVM). ("Courts have made the policy decision to
ensure that these organizations act in the public interest and do not abuse their power, but judicial review is
limited to protecting the public interest.")

3.

According to the position taken by the litigation strategy (28 U.S.C. §§ 516, 519) you are responsible for,
accreditors in the U.S. can support and protect schools like the 422 schools collectively accredited by the
Association of Theological Schools and Northwest Commission on Colleges and Universities that operate in
39 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and the sovereign country of Canada by allowing the
following outrageous criteria for education that:
a. gags a student and/or family member from discussing or reporting child molestations (CA Penal
Code Sections 647.6, 11165) like the ones by pastor Steve Korch as a requirement to receive the
benefits of prior or future course work and two master degrees;
b. alters and obstructs freedoms of speech and religion of a student and/or family member as a
requirement to receive the benefits of prior and future course work and two master degrees;
c. gags a student whistleblower and/or family member from reporting to the government a school's
intentional misrepresentations to the U.S. Department of Education, Office for Civil Rights
regarding the school's noncompliance with Section 504 in 2001 and during a federal investigation
(18 U.S.C. § 1001) -- when the school deceptively backdated documents during a federal
investigation involving Matt Tuck, Gary Tuck, Bert Downs, Randal Roberts, Rob Wiggins and
Lynn Ruark who falsely claimed Western had programs that did not exist (CA Penal Code § 134)
in order to retain Title IV funding that requires compliance with federal laws, while it retaliated
against me (Barker v. Riverside County Office of Education, No. 07-56313 (9th Cir. Oct. 23,
2009)). Covering up the school's deception to the government was a requirement to receive the
benefits of prior and future course work and two master degrees;
d. prevents a student and/or family member from filing or acting on complaints to the government as
a requirement to receive the benefits of prior and future course work and two master degrees;
e. violates FERPA (20 U.S.C. § 1232g; 34 CFR Part 99) at will;
f. threatens a student and/or family member with great financial vengeance of up to $400,000
liquidated damages for filing complaints to the government, for refusing to dismiss prior
complaints to the government, and for making any statement about unlawfulness by the school or
school employees as a requirement to receive the benefits of prior and future course work and two
master degrees;
g. prohibits the student and/or family member from reporting tax fraud to the Internal Revenue
Service or the California Franchise Tax Board by a nonprofit school and its administrators who
contrived in an unwritten agreement for one of the school administrators (Steve Korch) to receive
an under the table secret excess benefit of $25,000 that was unreported from the nonprofit school's
general fund of charitable donations, tuition fees, and Title IV funds in direct violation of the
school's Articles of Incorporation without a school committee vote recording its approval as the
IRS requires, for an educational program requirement to receive the benefits of prior and future
course work and two master degrees;
h. accreditors are not required to operate their associations under 34 CFR Section 602; they can
backdate policies and approvals, use "unwritten policies," make up on the spot or create ad hoc
policies with no oversight to avert enforcement of published accreditation policies upon a school,
and to misrepresent or even destroy public policies to benefit their member schools in order for
their schools to not be held accountable for educational and corporate fraud.

www.educationalfraud.com

181

Government Corruption and Educational Fraud

Section: Personal Statements

That is not all. Thousands of pages held by the government already note more evidence than I listed above.
Instead of turning documents over, Justice and the USDE fought my mother, stepfather and me.567 Are the
attorneys in Justice dropping acid and snorting coke, because what the hell is the Obama Administration
thinking?568
a.

b.
c.
d.
4.

Western Seminary is not a church, a religious group does not own it nor does Western Seminary
ordain. Students pay to attend. The word “seminary” in its name is a misnomer and
misrepresentation to the public. Not all course work is Religious and the school offers degrees,
which are publically deemed as non-religious. Education and degrees earned at Western Seminary
constitute a secular act, by a secular organization, performing a secular function under secular
laws (ORS 348.594).
Schools cannot do whatever they want against students. Babcock v. New Orleans Baptist
Theological Seminary, 554 So. 2d 90 (1989) (A077) [an ATS school], the Court determined that a
religious seminary had decided, in a manner that was “grossly unfair and arbitrary.”
Even the disciplinary decisions of private schools are subject to judicial review. See, Lexington
Theological Seminary (an ATS school), supra; Tedeschi, supra; Coveney v. Pres. & Trus. of Holy
Cross Col., 388 Mass. 16, 445 N.E.2d 136 (1983) as cited in Babcock.
Even the Religious cannot go about destroying a student’s education. Yet the litigation strategy
(28 U.S.C. §§ 516, 519) supported the corruption that amounted to a RICO case.569

Even when the London Embassy, Obama, Clinton570 were made known of the abduction of Joel Chapel, it
was more important to maintain the litigation strategy (28 U.S.C. §§ 516, 519) – even so far as to manipulate
Susan as an asset against me, while using Joel as a pawn. 571 572 The damage to Joel and our family has left
serious scars in our lives.573 574

567

James A. Scharf portrayed my parents and me as victimizing the government for seeking government records through FOIA. My father Maj.
Dale Wilson, Ph. D. (Ret) is a 100% disabled vet, and my mother is a retired school teacher in her 70's. According to Scharf's position for the
government, we brought the government to its knees by overburdening them with our FOIA requests and five lawsuits over a span of four years
seeking records through FOIA as we pursued justice. In contrast, the Judicial Watch filed 832 FOIA requests and 65 lawsuits (2009-2012) against
the Obama Administration. According to the calloused representation by James A. Scharf for YOU against my family and me, I should just
"move on," after your administration destroyed my life by not enforcing laws that protect students like me and my family and disregard us
seeking records via FOIA.
568
Take just the child molestation issue. The National Center for Victims of Crime estimates that one of four girls and one of six boys will
experience an episode of sexual abuse while younger than 18 years. However, the numbers of boys affected may be falsely low because of
reporting techniques (Ann Botash, MD, Pediatric Annual, May, 1997). Moreover, the Bureau of Justice Statistics reported in 2000 that 67 percent
of all victims of sexual assault reported to law enforcement agencies are juveniles (under the age of 18). That makes for millions of voters in
America who have been the subject of sexual abuse. It is likely that many of them will be very provoked that you can earn an education
only by way of covering up sexual abuse and their tax dollars are going towards an agency that is promoting such is valid.
569
Hower, et al. v. The Roman Catholic Church Archdiocese of Santa Fe, et al., U.S. District Court of Arizona, Case No: CIV04-369 TUCDCB.
Mr. Hower filed on August 4, 2004, under federal RICO, concerning a conspiracy to destroy his education, block his ordination to the priesthood
by a number of dioceses and their bishops, because he was a whistleblower who reported the homosexual misconduct of various priests. As
alleged, Cardinal William Keeler contacted the Josephinum and ordered that Mr. Hower be dropped from the educational career path for priests
and directed that Mr. Hower leave the Diocese of Harrisburg so that he could contemplate his commitment to God and to the Church. According
to Mr. Hower’s attorney, his case settled out of court, while The Roman Catholic Church Archdiocese of Santa Fe ended up in bankruptcy court.
Now the ironic part - Jeremiah McCarthy, former ATS Director, worked with Daniel Aleshire to collude with Western Seminary and manipulate
the government and Courts. Upon leaving ATS, he went to St. Patrick’s Seminary, close enough to be used in collusion with Western Seminary
et al as an expert witness in two concurrent civil cases he and Daniel Aleshire had agreed to help Western Seminary concerning. Once that
scheme was outed by me, he proceeded to hide out at the National Catholic Educational Association. In April 2014, he left there and returned to
his home Diocese of Tucson, Arizona. The very same diocese that was sued by Philip Hower when members of the Catholic Church acted to
cover up the child molestations / homosexual misconduct Philip Howers refused to take part in covering up, and to which the Church leaders
ultimately destroyed Philip Howers’ education as a result. He will be working for Bishop Gerald Kicanas, the same noted in the massive cover up
related to priest sex abuse cases in Chicago, which includes a seminary cover up. (ATS school : Mundelein Seminary at the University of St.
Mary of the Lake) Jeremiah McCarthy comes off as humble and gracious, but as demonstrated with Daniel Aleshire, both are very wicked men
and they will do anything to cover for the member schools of the Association of Theological Schools.
570
Hillary Clinton made no effort distance or denounce what Obama, Holder and Duncan were doing.
571
The U.S. Supreme Court recognizes parental rights as a fundamental human right protected under the U.S. Constitution. It has regularly
stressed the magnitude of parental rights, such as the right to conceive and to raise one's children have been deemed "essential," Meyer v.
Nebraska, 262 U.S. 390, 399 (1923), "basic civil rights of man," Skinner v. Oklahoma, 316 U.S. 535, 541 (1942), "rights far more precious...than
property rights," May v. Anderson, 345 U.S. 528, 533 (1953), and that “[T]he liberty interest at issue...the interest of parents in the care, custody,
and control of their children--is perhaps the oldest of the fundamental liberty interests recognized by this Court...[I]t cannot now be doubted that
the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment protects the fundamental right of parents to make decisions concerning the care, custody,
and control of their children.” Troxel v. Granville, 530 US 2000, 99-138.

Government Corruption and Educational Fraud

182

www.educationalfraud.com

Section: Personal Statements

The Obama Administration was more interested in casting a web of deception upon the courts, and the public, rather
then enforce the law, and protect my family and me from further abuse and retaliation.
What do you think the public and Congress is going to say when they learn that no one from the insurance
companies, the attorneys, the mediator, Western Seminary et al, NWCCU et al or ATS et al has been held
accountable nor anyone from the scandal-plagued Department of Education?575 Yet, under your leadership, you
committed my family to perpetual bondage at the hands of immoral men by spreading and defending injustice in the
name of justice.
Beating the crap out of me at all cost and in the name of purported “justice” doesn’t make the
Obama Administration’s position right; it simply makes the Obama Administration a bully. In
pulverizing a person, supporting fraud and abuse with public money, intentionally making
misrepresentations to the court and public, psychologically torturing and emotionally
water boarding me doesn’t make the governments’ arguments justified either. It simply betrays
how fucked up the Obama Administration is.
Now you are leaving office, so as to not face Congress and respond to what has been done– no different than what
George W. English and Samuel Kent did.576 Thus, you have left as your legacy … that the secular act of education
and earning a degree (chattel) can be exploited by professors, administrators, schools, accreditation agencies over
and against students and their families. Defended under your leadership, education can be utilized as vehicle for
corruption and fraud.
Instead of Rule of Law (A003, A004577), the Obama Administration acted via Rule by Law, twisting and devaluing
the Law that constraints government and its officials, embracing corruption and the hate group known as Western
Seminary and the 259 other schools that operate in 39 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and the
sovereign country of Canada, ATS and NWCCU. Nor am I the only one to sees your contempt for the law:
“Eric Holder is the most divisive U.S. Attorney General in modern history. … By needlessly injecting
politics into law enforcement, Holder's legacy has eroded more confidence in our legal system than any AG
before him. … Holder also has the dubious distinction of, in a vote supported by 17 Dem Members, being
the first AG held in criminal contempt of the House”578
- House Oversight Chairman Darrell Issa

572
It also includes a substantive component that “provides heightened protection against government interference with certain fundamental rights
and liberty interests.” Washington v. Glucksberg, 521 U.S. 702, 720; see also Reno v. Flores, 507 U.S. 292, 301-302.
573
The articles and research all support, that International Parental Child Abduction has serious long term consequences for the child, the left
behind parent and the taking parent. See the previous section for a list of materials nationally and internationally, citings and support both in the
US and UK.
574
Susan used the legal advise of Belinda Smith to abduct and retain Joel in the UK, which might be subject to malpractice in the UK. It has been
held in the US as malpractice. In McEnvoy v. Helikson, 562 P.2d 540 (Or. 1977), the Oregon Supreme Court recognized the right of a father to
sue his ex-wife's lawyer for malpractice and negligence for conduct which allegedly resulted in the removal of his daughter from the country in
violation of his custody rights. Sought $500 in damages for the attorney's negligence, and $1,750,000 for the loss of companionship, love and
affection of his child, for anguish and mental suffering due to the loss of his child, and for the continuing nature of these wrongs. (see also the
case and award of $950,000 to Roy Innes and his daughter in their suit against Lesnevich & Marzano-Lesnevich and name partner Madeline
Marzano-Lesnevich
http://www.abajournal.com/news/article/nearly_1m_awarded_to_dad_who_sued_moms_law_firm_for_role_in_child_abduction/)
575
No action means they will work harder next time to not get caught, as compared to doing what is right the first time. Since there is no
consequence for their actions, there is no need to modify behavior.
576
George W. English resigned Nov. 4, 1926 as judge of the U.S. District Court for eastern district of Illinois. As a result, proceedings (abuse of
power) were dismissed. Samuel Kent resigned July 30, 2009 as judge U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas. As a result,
proceedings (Sexual assault, obstructing and impeding an official proceeding, and making false and misleading statements) were dismissed.
577
“When states wield the law as a political weapon or an instrument of repression against civil society and the media, they rule by law rather
than upholding the rule of law. The rule of law acts as a check on state power, i.e., it is a system designed to protect the human rights of the
individual against the power of the state. In contrast, rule by law can be an abuse of power, i.e., the manipulation of the law and the judicial
system to maintain the power of the rulers over the ruled.” U.S. State Department.
578
Rep Darrell Issa. @DarrellIssa Retrieved September 30, 2014. https://twitter.com/DarrellIssa/status/515182622386192384

www.educationalfraud.com

183

Government Corruption and Educational Fraud

Section: Personal Statements

“Good riddance Eric Holder. Your disregard for the Constitution of the United States will not be
missed.”579
- Rep. Jeff Duncan
“AG #Holder's resignation is an overdue relief for every American who believes in the integrity of our
nation’s laws.”580
- Rep. Mike Kelly
“Americans aren't blind to the Department of Justice's politicization under Eric Holder”581
- Rep. Mark Meadows
“Holder's tenure will be remembered for refusal to uphold law & Constitution, disrespect for role of
Congress & contempt for the institution”582
- Rep. Tom Rooney
“Eric Holder's tenure has been marked by the politicization of justice and disrespect for the rule of law”583
- Rep. Ron DeSantis
“With Holder resigning, my hope is for an Attorney General who respects the rule of law instead of trying
to find ways around it.”584
- Rep. Bradley Byrne
“Now that Eric Holder is resigning, my hope is that the next Attorney General respects the rule of law.”585
- Rep. Pete Sessions
“Holder's resignation should embolden Congress to seek truth in Fast & Furious, IRS/FBI targeting, Fort
Hood & voter ID obstruction scandals”586
- Rep. Steve Stockman
Inscribed on the wall of the Attorney General’s rotunda: “The United States wins its point whenever justice is done
its citizens in the courts.” What could P O S S I B L Y define a legitimate litigation strategy (28 U.S.C. §§
516, 519) to do what has been done to my family and me by the Obama Administration and under your direction as
U.S. Attorney General? Not to mention using James A. Scharf as a blunt weapon to harm my family and me.
Limone v. United States, 497 F. Supp. 2d 143 (D. Mass. 2007)
On July 26, 2007, Judge Nancy Gertner ordered the federal government to pay a record $101.7 million to
innocent men. Peter Limone, Joseph Salvati, and the families of the two other men who died in prison
had sued the federal government for malicious prosecution. They argued that Boston FBI agents knew
mob hitman Joseph "The Animal" Barboza lied when he named the men as killers in the 1965 death of
Edward Deegan. They said Barboza was protecting a fellow FBI informant, Vincent "Jimmy" Flemmi,
who was involved. This award was upheld in 2009 by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit.
"The FBI's misconduct was clearly the sole cause of this conviction," the judge said. "It took 30 years to
uncover this injustice, and the government's position is, in a word, absurd…. No lost liberty is
dispensable. We have fought wars over this principle. We are still fighting these wars…" (A005)

579

Rep Jeff Duncan. @RepJeffDuncan Retrieved September 30, 2014. https://twitter.com/RepJeffDuncan/status/515158750190399488
Rep. Mike Kelly. @MikeKellyPA Retrieved September 30, 2014. https://twitter.com/MikeKellyPA/status/515210597236211712
Rep. Mark Meadows. @Repmarkmeadows Retrieved September 30, 2014.
https://www.facebook.com/Repmarkmeadows/posts/689143801164080
582
Rep. Tom Rooney. @TomRooney Retrieved September 30, 2014. https://twitter.com/TomRooney/status/515162610350977024
583
Rep. Ron DeSantis. @RepDeSantis Retrieved September 30, 2014. https://twitter.com/RepDeSantis/status/515184239923695616
584
Rep. Bradley Byrne. @RepByrne Retrieved September 30, 2014. https://twitter.com/RepByrne/status/515158943006748672
585
Rep. Pete Sessions. @PeteSessions Retrieved September 30, 2014. https://twitter.com/PeteSessions/status/515172257174679553
586
Rep. Steve Stockman. @SteveWorks4You Retrieved September 30, 2014. https://twitter.com/SteveWorks4You/status/515184884151619584
580
581

Government Corruption and Educational Fraud

184

www.educationalfraud.com

Section: Personal Statements

The four men convicted on Barboza's lies and their families (wives, ex-wife, and children) were treated
as "acceptable collateral damage" by the U. S. Department of Justice, because the FBI's priority at the
time was taking down the Mafia. (ibid.) "Do I want the money? Yes, I want my children, my
grandchildren to have things I didn't have, but nothing can compensate for what they've done," Mr.
Salvati said. (ibid.) Mr. Limone, who served 33 years in prison before he was freed in 2001, said. "What
I've been through — I hope it never happens to anyone else." (ibid.)
“The record evinces egregious governmental misconduct; the FBI agents responsible for handling
Barboza exhibited a callous disregard for the scapegoats' rights. But it is our duty to interpret and apply
the law even-handedly, regardless of the egregiousness of a defendant's misconduct. …
The damage awards give us pause. Insofar as the awards embody damages for wrongful incarceration,
they are considerably higher than any one of us, if sitting on the trial court bench, would have ordered.
We nonetheless affirm those awards. Our proper function as appellate judges is not to second-guess the
trial court but, rather, to apply a very deferential standard of review. Adhering to that role, and testing the
disputed awards only to that extent, we conclude that the awards, though high, are not so grossly
disproportionate to the harm sustained as to either shock our collective conscience or raise the specter of
a miscarriage of justice. …
This case exemplifies a situation in which the end did not justify the government's use of very
unattractive means. In its zeal to accomplish a worthwhile objective (stamping out organized crime), the
FBI stooped too low. Its misconduct was not only outrageous but also tortious. That misconduct resulted
in severe harm to the persons wrongfully convicted and to their families. Under these unfortunate
circumstances, the large damage awards mark the last word of a sad chapter in the annals of federal law
enforcement.” (Limone v. United States, 579 F.3d 79 (1st Cir. 2009), A088)
Succinctly, backed by clear and convincing evidence cited and attached in this document, the Obama Administration
subverted justice and abused power to protect the morbidly vacuous Margaret Spellings, the ungodly ATS /
Religious / Western Seminary et al., and the godless NWCCU et al., at the expense of my family and me. The
evidence is irrefutable. There is no legitimate litigation strategy (28 U.S.C. §§ 516, 519) that can be offered, to
support efforts to protect government corruption and educational fraud. None what so ever. The Administration did
this to my family under your leadership; to my wife and our son; you eviscerated our lives, labeling me as a
psychopath killer / mental ill person for life, taking away my rights forever.
At what point has the Obama Administration done an unchallengeable wrong Eric?

You bastard.

Personal Statement to President Obama (included for print on 11/8/14)
On January 21, 2009 you promised the nation, “Transparency and the Rule of Law will be the Touchstones of this
Presidency,” yet according to the government, it doesn’t know how many hundreds of thousands of dollars (millions
at this point) it has spent to cover up government corruption and educational fraud from which my family and I
sought relief. Instead of enforcing the law and being transparent, the government has persisted in covering up and
silencing everything to do with this case, while issuing either excuses or intentional misrepresentations.
In court filings, the Obama Administration claims the government cannot be held responsible for making false and
misleading statements with the intent to cover up government corruption and educational fraud directly motivated to
protect various “insider people,” while inflicting as much damage as possible on my family and me. What the
Obama Administration has actually done is usher in administration enacted and controlled schemes to obstruct and
pervert justice, and abuse power through the executive branch and proxy through 3rd parties. The acts of the Obama
Administration are not founded on discretion – the acts are based in corruption.
Long after you are bouncing your grandchildren on your lap, long after your library has been built, long after you
have made millions in speeches, long after you have raised awareness of the need to help young men of color reach
their full potential and become an elder statesman of our country, we will be still dealing with the acts to destroy our
lives by your Administration; the obstruction of justice and abuse of power with the Religious.

www.educationalfraud.com

185

Government Corruption and Educational Fraud

Section: Personal Statements

“I have lost everything in my life: my house, my land, my education, my future, my family -everything and everyone dear to me, because your administration's priority was to cover up
government corruption and educational fraud by false and misleading statements, while
psychologically torturing and emotionally water boarding me to the point of irreparable harm.”587
(A006)
I understand that Eric Holder said, “There’s a certain level of vehemence, it seems to me, that’s directed at me [and]
directed at the president... You know, people talking about taking their country back. … There’s a certain racial
component to this for some people. I don’t think this is the thing that is a main driver, but for some, there’s a racial
animus.”
I don’t know the first thing about how hard your life has been or that of Eric’s, what it is like to actually hear
car doors lock when walking down the street,588 what it is like to face racial bias on a daily basis,589 your
struggles and perceptions in this world because you are a men of color and what it takes each day for you both
to make it, be husbands, fathers and leaders not only of this country, but men of color can look up to.
I don’t know much about my grandfather. I have been told he was abandoned as a child, suffered greatly
because of it and went to live with his aunt – there is so much shame surrounding such family history that it is
not talked about and now that he is dead, likely will never know fully.
In the 60’s to be colored, is vastly different than it is today and yet we still have a ways to go.
Even after Brown, people are still unjustly treated in our country because of their skin color and -- forget about
a good job, if your name happens to be ethnic – you will be looked over regardless of how smart you are, your
credentials, your goals, and ability.
My father, a very intelligent, career minded, goal driven, educated man, having earned an Ed.D from USC
would still be shunned because of his color/name and thus on Jan 12, 1968 when I was all of 18 months old, I
became Randal Scott Chapel (A118, A119). The surname Chaparro carries too much baggage for a gifted
Mexican in a white world.590
My father and mother would divorce when I was young and he would go on to marry someone else quickly, and
raise a son they adopted. I instead grew up without my father, having much of same anger that you have since
publicly made known.
Instead of drugs like you did, I worked my anger out in more constructive ways on a farm. This did not take out
the sting of people who used words as knives to dig at my family and me – “your father left your mother
because she was < fill in the blank with some demeaning statement >” or “your father replaced you” and so on.
Marrying Susan was, in part, to do what my father did not – be a faithful husband and father – something the
men in my family have suffered with by the very men in my family.
The “vehemence” is not because you’re both persons of color; rather what the Obama Administration did to my
family.

587
The May 13, 2013, Letter to President Barack Obama, Ms. Valerie Jarrett, Mr. Eric Holder, Mr. Arne Duncan, Mr. Robert Mueller, Ms.
Melinda Haag, Ms. Robin C. Ashton, Ms. Laurie O. Robinson, Mr. Robert L. Listenbee, Ms. Catherine Connell McSherry and many others
588
“There are, frankly, very few African-American men who haven't had the experience of walking across the street and hearing the locks click
on the doors of cars. That happens to me, at least before I was a senator. ... And I don't want to exaggerate this, but those sets of experiences
inform how the African-American community interprets what happened one night in Florida.” President Obama, Accessed Aug 18, 2014. URL:
http://www.thewire.com/politics/2013/07/obama-gives-unexpected-speech-race-trayvon-martin-could-have-been-me-35-years-ago/67391/
589
For those who doubt what men of color face on a daily basis, see what happens when a white or black guy attempts to get into a car :
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MuyMuLGXxTs
590
Doubt this – see http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PR7SG2C7IVU By Anglicizing his name, that made all the difference.

Government Corruption and Educational Fraud

186

www.educationalfraud.com

Section: Personal Statements

I AM NOT YOUR ADMINISTRATION’S BITCH, MY WIFE – MY NOW EX-WIFE IS NOT THE
GOVERNMENT’S WHORE TO MANIPULATE AND OUR FAMILIES AND MOST OF ALL JOEL ARE NOT
AMERICA’S SERVANT. NONE OF US WERE PUT ON THIS EARTH TO BEAR THE BURDEN OF
GOVERNMENT CORRUPTION AND EDUCATIONAL FRAUD BY THE RELIGIOUS AND THE UNITED
STATES OF AMERICA. I WANT NOTHING TO DO WITH THE CORRUPTION OF THE GOVERNMENT OF
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, THE “GODLY” OR THEIR GOD. WHY IS THIS SO HARD FOR
YOUR ADMINISTRATION TO UNDERSTAND – WHY THE HELL DO YOU FIGHT ME TO FORCE ME
INTO SOMETHING I WILL FIGHT WITH EVERTHING IN MY BEING AGAINST?
“Transparency and the Rule of Law will be the Touchstones of this Presidency”
These “words” are just symbols – marks on a paper. They carry no meaning; they have no value; put together they
mean nothing. It is fatuous to believe in them.
Actions speak louder than words and the actions of this Administration are corruption must be protected.
When Joel finally makes his way to my grave591 – to a father he has not seen since being 21 months old, he will not
cry because is father abandoned him, etc, etc, etc. No, he will cry because his father fought against incredibly evil
men that destroyed his childhood. Joel will cry because he never knew the father that loved him and his mother.
Your administration stole away the lives of my family and our future, piece-by-piece and replaced it with something
much altered and alien to haunt and torment the generations.592 (A021)
“… we stand for freedom, for justice, for dignity…”593 – no we don’t. “United States citizenship is a privilege”
(Secretary of State Hillary Clinton) – give mine to Jose Antonio Vargas – apparently he thinks being an American
will lead to freedom, justice and dignity. It doesn’t.
My civil rights – the civil rights of Carol Nye-Wilson and her husband Dale (both also impacted), to which also Joel,
an American has also suffered injury as well. This is why FTCA claims were made, that your administration denied
claiming sovereignty. Sovereignty to treat Carol, Dale, Joel and myself differently than any other American in the
history of the country for no just cause, “because your administration's priority was to cover up government
corruption and educational fraud by false and misleading statements, while psychologically torturing and
emotionally water boarding me to the point of irreparable harm.” (A006)594
Your Administration knew or had the information to know, including you Mr. President, including you; that what
Margaret Spellings had done had no legal support, let alone the actions of ATS, NWCCU and Western Seminary.
The U.S. Constitution, Congress, and State of California have never empowered either accreditation agencies (20
US Code § 1099b) or schools to trump the U.S. Constitution or a state constitution, federal or state laws, or
decisional cases.
Your administration used public money to defend and cover up the corruption and fraud of
the Religious, because their dishonesty intersected with the government’s need and priority
to cover up government corruption and failures within the Department of Education.

591
“Oh, Father, I cried. There was no shame in your confusion. Just as there had been no shame in your father’s before you. No shame in the fear,
or in the fear of his father before him. There was only shame in the silence fear had produced. It was the silence that betrayed us.... For a long
time I sat between the two graves and wept. When my tears were finally spent, I felt a calmness wash over me. I felt the circle finally close. I
realized that who I was, what I cared about, was no longer just a matter of intellect or obligation, no longer a construct of words. I saw that my
life in America – the black life, the white life, the sense of abandonment I’d felt as a boy, the frustration and hope I’d witnessed in Chicago – all
of it was connected with this small plot of earth an ocean away, connected by more than the accident of a name or the color of my skin. The pain I
felt was my father’s pain. My questions were my brothers’ questions. Their struggle, my birthright.” President Obama, Dreams from My Father:
A Story of Race and Inheritance
592
“Such losses, whether resolved or ambiguous, can reverberate through the family for generations.”
593
President Obama, statements concerning a counter-terrorism strategy against the Islamic State. Sept 10, 2014
594
May 5, 2013 letter to Obama, Jarrett, Eric Holder, Arne Duncan, Robert Mueller, Melinda Haag, Robin C. Ashton, Laurie O. Robinson,
Robert L. Listenbee, Catherine Connell McSherry and many others.

www.educationalfraud.com

187

Government Corruption and Educational Fraud

Section: Personal Statements

Your administration has violated my civil rights at every turn, covered up or destroyed material so that it cannot be
uncovered, threaten people, misled the public and the courts, used public money to bully and beat me up, financially
breaking my family while using public money, used and manipulated Susan and treated Joel as a pawn, among many
more things.
Because I would not capitulate to the government corruption and educational fraud, your Administration embarked
on a path, which retaliated against my family and me using deception, and force, thus causing irreparable damage. It
is one thing for your Administration to go out of its way to demonize me and destroy my life, but it is another to
take it out against my wife and our son. What your Administration has done is wicked and incredibly fucked up,
Barack. The ultimate dick move done on a family – to my wife and our child.
“Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter.”
- Martin Luther King, Jr.
What could my family and me have done to deserve such malevolence by the United States of America and your
Administration? The destruction of my family and me is your legacy before the nation, not “Transparency and the
Rule of Law will be the Touchstones of this Presidency.”
As Eric Holder is responsible for the government’s litigation strategy (28 U.S.C. §§ 516, 519), which eviscerated my
family, my life and my liberties, you, as President are responsible for those under you. You are ultimately
responsible for allowing and covering for the Religious to commit unspeakable evil against my family, me and
others.
“No God condones this terror. No grievance justifies these actions. There can be no reasoning, no
negotiation, with this brand of evil. The only language understood by killers like this, is the
language of force” – President Barack Obama regarding religiously motivated fanatics - ISIS on
Sept 24, 2014.
As the evidence demonstrates in this document, I have every right to seek justified retaliation (A105)595 against
these religious terrorists. Not a single school of the other 259 ATS schools, not a single instructor from any of those
schools has spoken up against what Western Seminary et al, Daniel Aleshire and Jeremiah McCarthy have been
doing. We are not simply fighting religiously motivated fanatics in the Middle East, the fight is here in America
with the Religious – these right-wing extremists, who see themselves above the law in every way, who demand to be
treated differently because they claim superior morality or religious exception. These people are not godly and there
is no way that any true god, if such actually existed, would condone what they are doing. They don’t represent
good-natured people, that fill our places of worship, that seek to do good in their communities. The Religious I have
fought, they are of the darkest evil mankind can muster – and you and your Administration protected them with the
public’s money because their corruption intersected with the government’s malevolence.
Randy Chapel

595
“The backward-looking approach looks to what has already happened: it justifies retaliation purely in terms of the justice of meting out
punishment to one who has deliberately caused harm to others. This rationale, which philosophers call deontological (from the Greek word for
necessity), is often linked with the popularly expressed goals of retribution, revenge, vengeance, an eye for an eye. The idea is that one who does
harm deserves to suffer, that punishment is just and even necessary to ‘right the wrong’ and restore the moral balance. The terrorists, like other
criminals, must be brought to justice; justice must be brought to the terrorists.”

Government Corruption and Educational Fraud

188

www.educationalfraud.com