Michael Wilson English 111 Professor Miller 4/01/08

Humankind is an amazing species with incredible potential. Collectively, we steer our intellect in a way in which no other living beings can. With our heart, soul, brain power, and a little bit of hard work, we’ve sent mankind into the exploration of outer space, cured multiple diseases that have had the potential to destroy millions, crafted masterpieces of artwork too numerous to name, and have extended our love of the earth into every mountain, tree, ocean, and creature of this planet. However, madness and genius are close relatives. Among many of our "advanced" abilities we enjoy over other species, is our willingness to hate. This duality is the spring from which all conflict arises. In one day, a human being can love, hate, control, remain passive, defend themselves, become shy or awkward, or feel extremely outgoing. This competition of conflicting emotions creates disorder within us. The disorder within us breeds disorder with one another. When we act disorderly with one another, this produces fear. Fear creates a state of panic. Panic urns for resolution. Quite too often, the decision on how to stifle panic has concluded with the election of another human being, or small body of human beings, to stand in front of us, pat us on the back, and assure us that "everything will be alright." If history were our best judge, overwhelmingly, we would find that this conclusion is, has been, and always will be, fundamentally flawed. The election of a leader from our own disorderly pack of conflicting emotional intellects is illogical, because the leader (him or herself) is a victim of this confliction! Why do we believe that the answer to solve confliction is to elect the conflicted? Secondly, why would such a person, understanding of his or her own conflictions choose to seek such a position? These are the types of questions that we have pondered over since the beginning of central governments. For our first question, our assumption is that the imaginary source of comfort is a quick fix for the weak masses. A belief of one human, or a small body of humans possessing some type of "On/Off" switch for their hateful, intolerant, greedy, or sociopath side(s)

is obviously an illusion, but a quicker fix for mass comfort than actually tearing down the dream world and starting over again with something tangible. However, what is to be said for our second question? Are we experiencing legitimate attempts to become super-human, with moments of monumental arrogance? Or does this public display of " super-humanism" amount to nothing more but a man or a woman, or group of men or women's personal desire's being fulfilled without the inclusion of society as a whole in the decision making process? In addition, if these Men and Women perfected such blatant disregard for the masses of people around the world, what could they accomplish if they pooled together? At the capstone of such a pyramid a New World Order rises, with the ultimate goal of a one-world government. The New World Order is a controversial topic that requires mostly independent research; do to the unfortunate nature of corporate mainstream media. Trusting high profile news media figures like Tom Brokaw, Dan Rather, Barbara Walters, William Buckley, George Stephanopoulos, Jim Lehrer, and Diane Sawyer, (just to name a few) to provide us with “honest and unbiased journalism” while also retaining membership in the Council on Foreign Relations (or C.F.R.) for short, (known for its nature of secrecy, and commitment to globalization), is a very tough task indeed. In a recent episode of “The Prophecy Club” airing April 7, 2006, David Rivera spoke at length to this hurdle, and to many of the other facets of corruption in mainstream media, and to the holders of their “strings.” Towards the middle of the program (1:43:02) Rivera quoted David Rockefeller’s words from 1991. “We are grateful to the Washington Post, the New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years. Nevertheless, the world is now

more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries.” Clenched tightly by the mighty grip of money and power, most of the news we see today is bias to represent what the owners of the newspaper, television, and radio stations want, and want not to air. Controlling major media outlets is essential for creating popular consensus, and before the emergence of the internet, global elite enjoyed a monopoly over the influence of a large majority of American's thoughts towards world events; with very little interference from true, unrestricted, independent media. Independent media, with the aid of the World Wide Web, has presented a threat to the stranglehold of “information” enjoyed by the elite, and as a result, a struggle to end "net neutrality" is on the rise. Day in and day out, the internet, becoming more and more like television, has had many of its popular "channels" bought out by puppets of global governance. Internet "ownership" may someday become a reality, but presently, any person with unrestricted access to the World Wide Web can research thousands of videos, essays, e-books, songs and artwork that expose the New World Order for who they truly are. Like most things, there are pro's and cons to the unrestricted ability of posting and accessing independent information, and checking the accuracy of some documents may become rather time consuming. However, once you have established trusted sources, you will generally find a much more honest and open media online, then on-air. As expected, those with interests in controlling public thought are furious with the outpour of information aided by the internet, and will take whatever measures necessary to restrict, surprises, or criticize such truths in a desperate attempt to hold onto the reigns of power. Being unable to receive true information on globalization from major network television stations such as Fox “news,” or MSNBC drives many to research these topics

elsewhere, and the consistent lack of debate in the mainstream media towards issues of global dominance, (when the public has obviously demanded converge) magnifies the fear corporate puppets like Rupert Murdock are now experiencing. Unlike the iron fists of Fox News, or MSNBC, public debate is ever rampant in true, independent media. There is no set standard for what is the have all, end all, only a majority consensus. This can be both productive, and frustrating when attempting to understand the history of the Global Elite. However, there is one thing in which all of us can agree. Utilizing several invite only, closed door committees, many members of which have “cross membership” (belonging to two or more related groups), a once formal, now symbolic group, “The Illuminati” writes world events like a bad movie. By 1783, the original Illuminati had attained over 600 members, and difference of opinion developed on how the group should run. This conflict resulted in lawyer Joseph Utzschneider, and three other professors testifying to Duke Karl Dahlberg’s Court of Inquiry, providing a list of Illuminati goals. This list included: 1) abolition of the monarchy and all ordered government. 2) Abolition of private property 3) abolition of inheritance 4) abolition of patriotism 5) Abolition of the family, through the abolition of marriage, all morality, and the institution of communal education for children 6) Abolition of all religion. In addition, their mission statement included the following: “the destruction of the church, all forms of Christianity, and the removal of all existing human governments to make way for a universal republic in which the utopian ideas of complete liberty from existing social,

moral, and religious restraint, absolute equality, and social fraternity, should reign.” (The Prophecy Club, April 7, 2006 12:00-15:00) Historically by stealth, but in the past 100 years, through moving in small increments, the “Illuminati,” (a group of bankers, policy makers, and children of previous elite), concentrate their power to effect change worldwide. By Heavily influencing the election of presidents, consolidating economic control, starting, funding, and fueling wars (many times on both sides), and spreading large disinformation campaigns on everything from gun control to climate change, Illuminatists hurl us down the trail towards a one world government. Whether or not such elite hold secretive meetings is up for debate, but we do have evidence of several high profile, invite only meetings in which key figures of economic, spiritual, and political power do attend. The meetings include (but are not limited to) The Bohemian Grove conference, The Builder burg meetings, The Club of Rome, The Freemasons, Skull and Bones, and the Council on Foreign Relations. In many of these groups, members of the United States government and foreign power brokers meet secretly, in direct violation of the Logan Act. The Logan Act, codified at 18 U.S.C. 953, states: "Any citizen of the United States, wherever he may be, who, without authority of the United States, directly or indirectly commences or carries on any correspondence or intercourse with any foreign government or any officer or agent thereof, in relation to any disputes or controversies with the United States, or to defeat the measures of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both. This section shall not abridge the right of a citizen to apply, himself or his agent, to any foreign government or the agents thereof for redress of any injury which he may have sustained from such government or any of its agents or subjects." What could U.S. officials, foreign heads of state, and international bankers be talking about that is so secretive that they would need to hold private meetings in

direct violation of the law? Well, if you were to read some of things publicly stated by members of these secret societies sometimes it is hard to believe the attendees of conferences like the Buildeberg meetings care much for their privacy at all! Take David Rockefeller's 2002 book, "memoirs" for example. A prominent banker, statesman, globalist, current patriarch of the Rockefeller family, and invited guest of many of the Buildeburg meetings, David Rockefeller had this to say on pg. 405 of his 2002 book "memoirs." “For more than a century, ideological extremists at either end of the political spectrum have seized upon well-publicized incidents to attack the Rockefeller family for the inordinate influence they claim we wield over American political and economic institutions. Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as 'internationalists' and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure - one world, if you will. If that is the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.” Continuing, Rockefeller states: “We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis and the nations will accept the New World Order.” This shocking admission from Rockefeller's best selling book leaves little to the imagination of what is said in secret. By their own admission, and through the help of pioneers in the “truth” movement, (prominent voices including Alex Jones, Aaron Russo, David Rivera, Charlie Sheen, Korey Rowe, and many others) the lid has blown wide open, and piles of information are now available concerning Illuminati plans. For instance, Typing "New World Order quotes” into Google gives enough material to keep you busy for days, featuring everyone from former C.F.R. chairman Dick Cheney, all the way to the Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton's husband, former president Bill Clinton. With such a wide distribution

of the information spoken of at these closed door meetings, and the initial pillars of their plans already put into place, Builder berg may start to become little more than a social club for the ruling elite to boast at how lazy their serfs are; how easily their rights and sovereignties have been snatched away. Global governance is already here, we just need to take the imitative to stop it from growing. For those interested in a complete timeline of the integration of economic and political structure, heading towards a one world nation, or New World Order, type in http://www. sovereignty. net/p/go/timeline. html. Here are a few important highlights from their list. • 1913, The Federal Reserve Act created the first "central bank" in America • 1919, The genesis of the Council on Foreign Relations, and the RIIA,(J.D Rockefeller and Paul Warburg were among their initial fund raisers.) • 1942, The Declaration of the United Nations • 1944, The Brinton Woods Agreements, which created the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund • 1945, The World Health Organization is created. • 1947, The World Federalist Association/Movement are created. • 1964, UNCTAD United Nations Conference on Trade and Development is established. • 1968, The Club of Rome is established. • 1973 The Trilateral Commission is formed, most participants also members of the C.F.R. • 1976 International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights - becomes international law. • 1978 Global Taxation - first proposed by James Tobin. • 1982 U.N. Convention on the Law of the seas - which created the International Seabed Authority.

• 1987 Montreal Protocol - converts voluntary Ozone Treaty into international law. • 1991 Stockholm Initiative on Global Security and Governance - origin of Commission on Global Governance. • 1994 World Trade Organization - formed at Uruguay round of GATT negotiations. Also, The Educate America Act, A bill which deemed our schools “too nationalistic” and said that children needed to become indoctrinated to consider themselves “world citizens” singed into law. • 1997 Kyoto Protocol - Adopted in Kyoto, Japan. Converts voluntary climate change treaty to binding international law. • 1998 International Criminal Court - created in Rome. Add this list to the past ten years, where we have seen the attacks in America on September 11, the 7/7 bombings in London, Israel's war with Lebanon, the war in Iraq and possible war with Iran, and you have a geo-political climate that is the wet dream of international control freaks bent on manipulating fear, and turning it into civil liberty stripping legislation. Combining forces of horrendously intrusive legislation like the Patriot act, with the influence of major corporate media outlets, Illuminists exploit our fears toward current events in an attempt to scare society into the acceptance of warrantless search and seizer, illegal wire-tapping, monitoring email and library records, and declaring war, (without the consent of congress, on the basis of false information) in exchange for the false promise of safety and security. Furthering this intrusion on our privacy, soon, every U.S. citizen, by force, will carry a “Real I.D.” card to prove that we are not illegal aliens, or even terrorists. Those who wish not to comply with the "Real I.D." (a federally standardized, “one-fits-all” identification card, replacing state driver’s licenses) will have little luck finding work, and if caught without their "papers" are subject to detention until their identity gains confirmation! And if you attempt to protest against

this surge of wrongdoing, prepare to become one of the many political protestors, which are becoming targets; shot repeatedly with tasers for non-violently resisting unjust arrest. This type of surveillance should be unacceptable in the United States, however, in London, it might be worse. In an April 17, 2006 article titled "U.K. Police State Surveillance Society out of Control" Steve Watson for Info wars. Com reports, “Britain is acknowledged as the world leader of Orwellian surveillance. An estimated 4.2 million closed-circuit TV cameras observe people going about their everyday business, from getting on a bus to lining up at the bank to driving around London. It's widely estimated that the average Briton is scrutinized by 300 cameras a day." With so much evil in our world today, the easiest thing to do is to shut our eyes and act as if nothing is wrong. If this is your solution to the problem at hand, western civilization is Mecca. Cable, satellite, internet, video games, fashion, drugs, iPod, arena football, luxury automobiles, and "extreme" energy drinks are just a few of the every day distractions tossed down from the cap stone, displacing us from one another and from the need to band together to stop forces of globalization. If one cares to do the research, the evidence for the case presented in this paper is overwhelming. Every single time you spend a dollar, your fingers graze the top and underneath the great pyramid, “announcing the secular order of the new ages” (annuit ceptis novus ordo seclorum). If we choose to remain asleep, we cannot stop the nightmare. We must awaken our fellow man, or the kingpins of the New World Order will reign supreme. Boycott, protest, and spread the information. Write. Record. Release. A massive movement of millions of conscious citizens is our only hope to reverse this awful trajectory. Take whatever small or large step you can today, to fight for a better world for tomorrow.

"In the next century, nations as we know it will be obsolete; all states will recognize a single, global authority. National sovereignty wasn't such a great idea after all." Strobe Talbot, President Clinton's Deputy Secretary of State, as quoted in Time, July 20th, l992.