7 views

Uploaded by S.m. Ferdous

drives

- Project Report on Speed Control of Dc Motor by Using PWM Technique
- ladoux2014.pdf
- LBC6K
- s 35102109
- Analysis of Chopper Fed d.c. Drive With Pwm & Hysteresis Current Control Scheme
- FPGA based motorize cooling
- cv ziani english
- Static Voltage Stabilizer Igbt Pwm (Anis)
- Study and Implementation of a Novel Bidirectional
- ELTEK for Sale From Powerstorm 19nov14
- PEDS.2009.5385776
- AC DRIVESTechnical guide book.pdf
- CONSTRUCCION Y DISEÑO DE INVERTER
- 484756
- UC3842 Inside Schematics
- Introductory Presentation On switch Dyanmics
- Bose Evaluation
- 021
- 2332x_toc
- Total Harmonic Distortion Analysis and Comparison of Diode Clamped Multilevel Z-Source Inverter

You are on page 1of 42

OF ELECTRIC VEHICLE

3.1 INTRODUCTION

Modeling of electric vehicles will make it more convenient to predict its performance

and characteristics. The primary parameter to be modeled is vehicle performance. By

performance we mean acceleration and top speed, an area where electric vehicles

have a reputation of being very poor. It is necessary that any electric vehicle has a

performance that allows it, at the very least, to blend safely with ordinary city traffic.

Another vitally important feature of electric vehicles that we must be able to predict

is their range. This can also be mathematically modeled, and computer programs

make this quite straightforward. The mathematics we will develop will allow us to

see the effects of changing things like battery type and capacity, as well as all other

aspects of vehicle design, on range. This is an essential tool for the vehicle designer.

We will go on to show how the data produced by the simulations can also have other

uses in addition to predicting performance and range. For example we will see how

data about the motor torque and speed can be used to optimize the compromises

involved in the design of the motor and other subsystems.

The first step in vehicle performance modeling is to produce an equation for the

tractive effort. This is the force propelling the vehicle forward, transmitted to the

ground through the drive wheels.

Let us consider a vehicle of mass m, proceeding at a velocity v, up a slope of angle

, as in Figure 3.1. The force propelling the vehicle forward, the tractive effort, has

to accomplish the following:

33

Figure 3.1: The forces acting on a vehicle moving along a slope. [6]

To overcome the aerodynamic drag;

To provide the force needed to overcome the component of the vehicles

weight acting down the slope.

accelerate the vehicle, if the velocity is not constant.

3.2.1

The rolling resistance is primarily due to the friction of the vehicle tyre on the road.

Friction in bearings and the gearing system also play their part. The rolling resistance

is approximately constant, and hardly depends on vehicle speed. It is proportional to

vehicle weight. The equation is:

Frr= rrmg

(3.1)

Where rr is the coefficient of rolling resistance. The main factors controlling rr are

the type of tyre and the tyre pressure. The free-wheeling performance of a vehicle

becomes much better if the tyres are pumped up to a high pressure, though the ride

may be less comfortable.

The value of rr can reasonably readily be found by pulling a vehicle at a steady very

low speed, and measuring the force required. Typical values of rr are 0.015 for a

34

radial ply tyre, down to about 0.005 for tyres developed especially for electric

vehicles.

3.2.2

AERODYNAMIC DRAG

This part of the force is due to the friction of the vehicle body moving through the

air. It is a function of the frontal area, shape, protrusions such as side mirrors, ducts

and air passages, spoilers, and many other factors. The formula for this component is:

Fad = 0.5CdAv2

(3.2)

Where is the density of the air, A is the frontal area, and v is the velocity. Cd is a

constant called the drag coefficient.

The drag coefficient Cd can be reduced by good vehicle design. A typical value for a

saloon car is 0.3, but some electric vehicle designs have achieved values as low as

0.19. There is greater opportunity for reducing Cd in electric vehicle design because

there is more flexibility in the location of the major components, and there is less

need for cooling air ducting and under-vehicle pipe work. However, some vehicles,

such as motorcycles and buses will inevitably have much larger values, and Cd varies

around 0.7 are more typical in such cases.

The density of air does of course vary with temperature, altitude and humidity.

However a value of 1.25 kg.m3 is a reasonable value to use in most cases. Provided

that SI units are used (m for A, m.s1for v) then the value of Fad will be given in

2

Newton.

3.2.3

The force needed to drive the vehicle up a slope is the most straight forward to find.

It is simply the component of the vehicle weight that acts along the slope. By simple

resolution of forces we see that:

Fhc= mg sin ()

(3.3)

35

3.2.4

ACCELERATION FORCE

If the velocity of the vehicle is changing, then clearly a force will need to be applied

in addition to the forces shown in Figure 3.1. This force will provide the linear

acceleration of the vehicle, and is given by the well-known equation derived from

Newtons second law,

Fla= ma

(3.4)

However, for a more accurate picture of the force needed to accelerate the vehicle we

should also

consider the force needed to make the rotating parts turn faster. In other

main issue here is the electric motor, not necessarily because of its particularly high

moment of inertia, but because of its higher angular speeds.

Figure 3.2: Arrangement for connecting a motor to a drive wheel using a belt system

with step up gear mechanism to increase the amount of torque. [6]

Referring to Figure 7.2, clearly the axle torque = Fter , where r is the radius of the

tyre, and Fte is the tractive effort delivered by the power train. If G is the gear ratio of

the system connecting the motor to the axle, and Tm is the motor torque, then we can

say that:

Tvech = Tm G

Tm =

Fte r

(3.5)

36

v

m = G vech = G r (rad/sec)

(3.6)

a

Tm = JG r

(3.7)

Where, J is the moment of inertia of the motor. The force at the wheels needed to

provide the angular acceleration (Fa) is found by combining this equation with Eq.

(3.7);

G2

Fa = J r 2 a

(3.8)

We must note that in these simple equations we have assumed that the gear system is

100% efficient, it causes no losses. Since the system will usually be very simple, the

efficiency is often very high. However, it will never be 100%, and so we should

rewrite the equation by incorporating the gear system efficiency g. The force

required will be slightly larger, so equation (7.8) can be rewritten to:

G2

Fa = J r 2 a g

(3.9)

2

Typical values for the constants here are 40 for G/r and 0.025 kg.m for the moment

of inertia. These are for a 30 kW motor, driving a car which reaches 60 kph at a

motor speed of 7000 rpm. Such a car would probably weigh about 800 kg. The right

hand side in equation (7.8) will have a value of about 40 kg in this case. In other

words the angular acceleration force given by equation (7.8) will typically be much

smaller than the linear acceleration force given by equation (7.4). In this specic (but

reasonably typical) case, it will be smaller by the ratio:

40

= .05 = 5%

800

It will quite often turn out that the moment of inertia of the motor J will not be

known. In such cases a reasonable approximation is to simply increase the mass by

5% in equation (7.4), and to ignore the Fa term.

37

3.2.5

Fte= Frr+ Fad+ Fhc+ Fla+ Fa

(3.10)

Where,

Frris the rolling resistance force, given by equation (3.1);

Fadis the aerodynamic drag, given by equation (3.2);

Fhcis the hill climbing force, given by equation (3.3);

Flais the force required to give linear acceleration given by equation (3.4);

Fa is the force required to give angular acceleration to the rotating motor,

given by equation (3.9).

We should note that Fla and Fa will be negative if the vehicle is slowing down, and

that Fhc will be negative if it is going downhill.

3.3 MODELLING VEHICLE ACCELERATION

3.3.1

standard measure used. Typically the time to accelerate from standstill to 60 mph, or

30 or 50 kph will be given. The nearest to such a standard for electric vehicles are the

030 kph and 050 kph times, though these times are not given for all vehicles. Such

acceleration figures are found from simulation or testing of real vehicles. For IC

engine vehicles this is done at maximum power, or wide open throttle (WOT).

Similarly, for electric vehicles performance simulations are carried out at maximum

torque.

As discussed in Chapter 2 that the maximum torque of an electric motor is a fairly

simple function of angular speed. In most cases, at low speeds, the maximum torque

is a constant, until the motor speed reaches a critical value c after which the torque

falls. This critical value of speed is mostly known as the base speed of the motor i.e.

the speed up to which the motor is capable of maintaining the maximum or constant

torque that it produces. In the case of a brushed shunt or permanent magnet DC

motor the torque falls linearly with increasing speed. In the case of most other types

38

of motor, the torque falls in such a way that the power remains constant. The angular

velocity of the motor depends on the gear ratio G and the radius of the drive wheel r

as in equation (3.5) derived above. So we can say that:

For, m< base ; Tm = Tmax = 97.5 N.m

(3.11)

= T0 KG

(3.12)

Where,

vech = angular velocity of the velocity (i.e. angular velocity of the axle) (rad/sec)

m = angular velocity of the motor (rad/sec)

Eq. (3.11) represents motor torque in terms of angular velocity of the vehicle where

as Eq. (3.12) represents it in terms of linear velocity of the vehicle.

3.3.2

Tm = KTIa =

K T V

RT

m = 2vech = 2

Tm = KTIa =

K T V

RT

KT KB 2

v

RT

2K T K B 2

RT r

= 65015.384

At base speed, m = base;

= = 97.5 = 65015.384

551.33

15.984

= 35.84 rad/sec

(3.13)

(3.14)

(3.15)

(3.16)

(3.17)

(3.18)

39

3.3.3

Total tractive force required for the vehicle movement when it is moving in a road in

a smooth flat plane,

Fte= Frr+ Fad+ Fla+ Fa

as per Eq. (3.10). Hill climbing force can be considered zero because of assuming

zero inclination.

dv

(3.19)

Here the moment of inertia of the motor is not known, so we will adopt the expedient

suggested at the end of Section 7.2.5, and increase m by 5% in the linear acceleration

term only.

Torque required for the traction,

Tte = Fte x r

(3.20)

The motor is coupled with the axle through a gear. If G is the gear ratio, then the total

load torque for traction referred to motor shaft can be written asTm = Motor Torque =

T te

F te r

G

= [ + + 0.5 2 ]

where, = =

= [

+ + 0.0625 2 2 ]

(3.21)

(3.22)

= vehicle velocity

Let us put all the values in Eq. (3.22) to obtain a equation that will describe the

dynamics of traction load;

The electric vehicle has a mass of 380 kg, with a typical passenger of mass 180

kg (for 3 passengers with average mass of 60kg) so total mass m = (180+200)

= 380 kg.

To incorporate the angular acceleration of different rotating parts of the vehicle

along with motor, m is increased by 5% in the linear acceleration term only.

A value of 400 kg will thus be used from m in the final term of equation

(3.19).

40

electric vehicle whose shape of the body is aerodynamically designed and

optimized.

The frontal area of vehicle and rider = 1.2 m .

2

rr= 0.005 which is a typical value for specially designed tires for electric

vehicle.

The motor is connected to the rear wheel using a 2:1 ratio belt system, and the

wheel diameter is 60 cm. Thus G = 2 and r = 0.3 m.

A typical figure of the motor coupled with the axle of the vehicle through a step up

gear mechanism is shown in Figure. (3.3).

Figure 3.3: The simplified diagram of the designed system of connecting the motor

with the driving axle of the vehicle with a geared mechanism.

41

Putting all the values in Eq. (3.22) the final equation can be obtained as = 9

+ 2.95 + 0.00075 2

(3.23)

= 60 + 2.95 + 0.03321 2

(3.24)

When m < base; the motor will produce maximum amount of torque and this

torque will be utilize to accelerate the vehicle. From Eq. (3.24);

1.576 =

+ 0.0005535 2

= 1.576 0.0005535 2

(3.25)

When m base; i.e. v 5.376, motor torque is given by Eq. (3.16). Based

on that, Eq. (3.24) can be written as-

Tm = 65015.384m

= 65015.384

0.3

(3.26)

The total vehicle traction acceleration and final speed can be modeled using Eq.

(3.25) and Eq. (3.26). There are many practical and simple ways of solving these

differential equations using a simple initial condition that v = 0 when t = 0.

However, the most versatile next step is to derive a simple numerical solution, which

can then easily be used in MATLAB.

The derivative of v is simply the difference between consecutive values of v divided

by the time step. Applying this to equation (3.25) gives us:

+1

=

= 1.576 0.0005535 2

+1 = + t (1.576 0.0005535 2 )

(3.27)

42

(3.28)

Eq. (3.27) holds valid for velocities up to the critical velocity of 5.376 ms1, after

which we have to use equation (3.28), approximated in exactly the same way as we

have done for equation (3.27).

The MATLAB script le (discussed in Appendix-A) shows how to solve these

equations using this program. Figure 3.4 is a plot of the solution using a time step t

of 0.1s.

Figure 3.4: The initial acceleration and final velocity of the vehicle.

From the figure it is clearly evident that the vehicle takes just over 5 seconds to reach

its maximum speed of 22.5kmph. At this point the motor will rotate at a speed of

41.667 rad/sec which is very close to its rated speed (38.46 rad/sec).

43

Figure 3.5: The torque-velocity curve of the motor and vehicle respectively.

The maximum amount of torque obtained from the motor is around 95 N.m. This

torque is responsible to accelerate the vehicle. This maximum torque of 95 N.m is

maintained up to the base speed of the motor which corresponds to the vehicle speed

of (5.376 x 3.6) = 19.3536kmph. After that, the torque begins to fall and eventually

settles down to the balancing speed of the motor. At final or balancing speed, the

torque falls very sharply as the acceleration phase is over and it requires only to

overcome the rolling resistance and aerodynamic resistance of the vehicle when

speed becomes constant (as Fla becomes zero at constant speed due to zero

acceleration).

The total torque profile of the vehicle from zero to final speed can be visualized as

shown in Figure 3.6-

Figure 3.6: The torque profile of the load as seen from the motor shaft.

44

The constant torque region provides the maximum torque which in turn provides a

linear constant acceleration up to base speed that is 19.35kmph speed of the vehicle.

After that, the torque falls naturally as it enters to the natural characteristic region of

its operation. Finally the motor torque matches with the load torque which falls

significantly and continues to operate at this value.

The axle torque i.e. the vehicle torque with respect to vehicle speed and time are

shown in Figure (3.7) and Figure (3.8) respectively. It may be noted here that, the

axle torque will be around 2 times greater than motor torque due to the presence of a

step up gear. At the same time, considering an efficiency of 98% for the gear

arrangement, the actual torque will be .98 times of it.

Figure 3.7: Axle Torque of the vehicle with respect to its speed. It is exactly in the

same nature of the motor-vehicle speed curve of Fig. (3.5).

45

Figure 3.8: Axle torque profile though out the entire time of run of the vehicle

Axle Torque of the vehicle with respect time to show the maximum starting torque

along with final steady state torque value of the vehicle. As the acceleration phase is

over around 7.5 seconds, the torque falls significantly and settles to a new lower

value where it remains constant for the rest of the period of it operation.

The final parameter of the motor to be discussed and analyzed is motor current. As

the current is proportional to motor torque, it will vary itself according to the

variation of torque during different periods of its operation.

The current-vehicle speed and current-time curves are shown in Figure (3.9) and

Figure (3.10) respectively.

46

Armature current of the motor varies with speed. Initially current is constant up to the

base speed and then starts to reduce as speed tends to become constant. Here the

average current value during starting is shown. In practice the starting current will be

very high which will be limited by using a current controller (will be discussed in the

next chapter). With the presence of controller, the current wave shape will not be like

this. But this result helps to final value of the current during Steady State operation

Figure 3.9: Armature current of the motor with respect to time. The current taken by

the motor is very small during steady-state operation.

47

CHANGE OVER TECHNIQUE

employed to drive a vehicle. The analysis and simulation show that, the maximum

achievable speed of the vehicle is 22.5kmph. Now, the feature of winding change

over should be employed and the vehicle parameters like speed, torque and motor

parameters like motor current and torque should be simulated and observed. It was

claimed at the very beginning of the thesis that, using this technique, the final speed

of the vehicle will be much higher than the speed obtained by running the vehicle

using conventional motors (like series or separately excited DC Motors).

When the vehicle settles down to its final speed of 22.5kmph, the controller of the

motor will disconnect the series field of the compound motor from the circuit. As

result there will be a sudden rise in the armature current (which will eventually

limited by the current controller) as well as motor torque to accelerate the vehicle to a

higher value of speed. This phenomenon can be observed by using the same model

that has been developed in immediate earlier to simulate conventional compound

motor.

When the series field winding is disconnected the motor will be converted to a

simple DC shunt motor whose torque-speed characteristic is pretty straight forward

and very simple to analyze. Due to winding change over the motor is left with only

one i.e. the shunt winding and the total flux of the machine will now be produced

with the help of shunt winding only. So, the torque equation can be written as-

Tm = KTshIa =

K T sh V

RT

= 195.0139.2333v

K T K B sh 2

RT

= 195.0131.385

(3.29)

Now, in the similar way of Eq.(3.25), we can develop another equation using Eq.

(3.29). It must be noted that, this Eq. (3.29) will be coming into the consideration

when the vehicle speed is equal to its final speed that is 22.5kmph i.e. 6.25m/s.

When, 41.667 rad/sec (i.e. vehicle speed, v6.25m/s);

48

(3.30)

(3.31)

+1

( + 1) = 2.95 + 60

+ 0.03321 2

(3.31)

Axle or the vehicle torque for traction can be calculated as ( + 1) = 5.9 + 120

+1

+ 0.06642 2

(3.32)

when, < 6.25 m/s; the armature current Ia is calculated as ( + 1) =

0.24+0.1138 (+1)0.4875

0.057

(+1)

0.4875

(3.33)

(3.34)

So, the modified MATLAB script file (shown in Appendix-B) according to the

modification done in the system due to winding changeover would yield the

following set of output curves for speed, torque and current. This set of results will

be used to compare the performance between the vehicle fitted with winding change

over facility and the vehicles operated with series and compound motor only without

winding change over facility. The different output and input parameters of the motor

as well as the vehicle obtained by simulation in MATLAB are shown as follows one

by one along with description and significance of the figures for interpretation.

49

Figure 3.10: Simulated Speed and acceleration characteristic of the vehicle with the

feature of winding change over facility.

A comparative diagram showing the speed without and with the winding change over

facility would be more helpful to justify the improvement in the performances of

vehicle. A diagram of such kind is shown in Figure 3.11 in the following-

Figure 3.11: Comparative analysis showing the differences in terms of final speed

between the two types of motor.

50

Fig. (3.11) clearly indicates that, the motor with winding change over facility would

provide the highest final speed. The difference in their final is around 47.5kmph.

This is certainly being a great advantage for the latter one compare to the former one.

Figure 3.11: Torque speed characteristic of the motor with winding change over

facility. The sharp rise in torque is due to sudden change in current consumed by the

armature due to disconnecting the series field.

The total torque profile of the motor is shown in Figure 3.12.

Figure 3.12: Torque profile of the motor during entire period of its operation.

51

compound motor with winding change over facility.

Figure 3.14: Torque profile of the vehicle from starting to winding change over to

steady state condition, when operated by a compound motor with winding change

over facility.

52

Figure 3.15: Speed-current characteristic of the motor. After winding change over,

the value of the current remains very during the entire period of its acceleration.

Figure 3.16: Current profile of the motor during its entire period of operation.

A very high current is being consumed by the current at the moment of winding

change over. This is due to the sudden reduction in the flux of the motor as the series

winding is disconnected from the armature at this instant. To sustain the same

amount of torque, the current of the motor rises to a very high value due to

compensate the reduction of flux. As the motor speed approaches towards its final

speed, the current starts to decrease and eventually settles down to a steady value. It

53

must be noted with great importance that, such amount of high current must not be

allowed to flow in the circuit as it may damage the winding as well as the motor. In

practice this current will be limited by using a hysteresis current controller which will

restrict the current within twice the maximum of its rated value (i.e. 40x2=80A). In

other words, the controller will allow a current to flow through the armature which

may be at best twice than its rated value. Such a limitation will obviously affect the

performance of the motor. Due to such restriction in current the torque produced by

the motor will be less and as result the acceleration of the vehicle beyond the instant

of winding change over will be reduced. But this will not affect the final speed of the

motor. Due to limited amount of torque available, the vehicle will take a relatively

long time to reach its final speed.

3.6 SUMMERY

This chapter deals with the modeling and simulation of electric vehicle. It is obvious

that, a vehicles mathematical model is crucially important in the design of electric

vehicles as it allows the designer very quickly to try out different design options,

virtually at no cost at all. Even a quite simple mathematical model used in this

chapter is sufficient to predict the performance parameters of a real vehicle.

54

CHAPTER 4

DESIGN OF CONVERTER AND CONTROLLER FOR

ELECTRIC VEHICLE

4.1 INTRODUCTION

This chapter presents the design of the controller of the motor. Choppers, also

commonly known as dc-to-dc converters which are used to get a variable dc voltage

from a dc source of fixed voltage. Because of the use DC voltage widely in electric

transportation and traction system, chopper controlled DC drives find a ready

application in that field.

DC-DC Converters are widely used for traction motor controls in electric

automobiles, trolley cars, marine hoists, forklift trucks and mine haulers. They

provide smooth acceleration control, high efficiency and fast dynamic response. DCDC converters can be effectively used in regenerative braking of DC motors to return

energy back into the supply and this feature results in energy savings for the

transportation systems with frequent stops.

Self commutated devices, such as MOSFETS. power transistors, IGBT (insulated

gate bipolar transistor), GTO ( gate turn-off thyristor) and IGCT (insulated gate

commutated thyristor). are preferred over thyristors for building choppers because

they can be commutated by a low power control signal and do not need commutation

circuit. Further, they can be operated at a higher frequency for the same rating. The

operation at a high frequency improves motor performance by reducing current ripple

and eliminating discontinuous conduction.

For any traction application a two quadrant converter with a pair of reversing switch

is necessary. Otherwise it is not possible for the motor to operate at all four quadrants

as it is mandatory for any motor to be capable of operating in all the four quadrants

employed for traction application.

55

In this design a Two Quadrant Class C DC-DC converter along with a pair of

reversing switch are used. The converter has a novel integrated feature of both PWM

and Hysteresis controller, where the PWM controller is used for variable voltage

operation of the motor (to run the vehicle at different speed) and hysteresis controller

is used for the purpose of current control. The designed system is shown in brief in

the following block diagram-

4.3 OPERATION OF THE CLASS C DC-DC CONVERTER

A typical class C converter is made of one pair of diode and one pair of switch.

Generally, it is made from one buck and one boost converter. For normal motoring

mode the circuit operates as buck controller. During braking of the motor which is

also known as regenerative braking, the converter operates as a boost converter to

feed back the stored kinetic energy of the motor to the source and thus reducing its

speed. A typical circuit is shown in Fig. 4.2.

56

The circuit shown in Figure 4.2 is a combination of one Buck and one Boost

converter. It is clear that, both transistors must not be turned on simultaneously as

that would short circuit the source V. They are turned on alternately and a short

interval (typically about 100s) is allowed to elapse between the removals of one

signal and the application of the other.

For first quadrant operation, Tr1 and D1 perform the functions of Forward motoring

and provide variable speed operation of the motor up to the base speed. Gate drive

signal with variable duty cycle enables the converter to provide with a variable

voltage appearing across its terminals. This mode of operation is called Class A

operation where the converter is operating as buck converter. Both armature current

and field current are positive. The motor develops torque to meet the load demand.

For second quadrant operation, Tr2 and D2 perform the functions of Regenerative

braking and the converter must operate as Boost converter to feed the stored kinetic

energy of the motor back to the supply system or the battery. This mode of operation

is also known as Class B operation of chopper. The motor acts as a generator and

develops an induced voltage equal to the back EMF of the motor, EB. The armature

current is negative but the field current is positive. The kinetic energy of the motor is

returned to the supply. The motor speed would decrease with time. To maintain the

armature current at the same level the effective load resistance of the motor acting as

generator during this period, must be adjusted by varying the duty cycle of the DCDC converter.

57

The converter circuit is simulated in LTSpice in motoring mode. The output wave

shape of the converter are shown in the following-

LTSpice.

58

Figure 4.4: Output current, voltage and PWM signal of the converter

The starting Current of the motor is around 345A which dangerously high enough to

damage the motor.

59

controller

Hysteresis current controller limits the starting motor current within its maximum

limit. If the motor current exceeds twice the value of the rated current the controller

turns off the power supply and when the current falls to value sufficiently low

enough the controller again turns on the power supply.

60

The variable output voltage can be obtained by varying the duty cycle of the

converter. Variation of duty cycle is possible by varying the reference voltage of the

PWM comparator. Gate driving pulses with variable duty cycle are generated to

operate the motor in different speed. This signal along with the output of the

hysteresis controller are fed to an AND gate where the output of hysteresis controller

dominates over the PWM signal. If the Current of the motor at any point due to

application of the voltage exceeds the certain limit the output of the hysteresis

controller goes zero setting an output zero for and gate too and eventually turns of the

power supply to the motor.

Regenerative braking will be obtained as the converter operates in the 2nd quadrant.

Gate signal with appropriate duty cycle must be generated to provide the switching.

The circuit must contain a duty cycle varying feature where the duty cycle of the

gating pulses will be varied by sensing the terminal voltage of the motor during

regenerative braking. The duty cycle must be varied to keep the output voltage of the

converter fixed as the voltage of the motor will be gradually decreasing during the

period of regeneration and as a result the speed of the motor will be decreasing. If the

voltage at the output of the converter is not kept fixed and higher than the source

voltage, it will not be possible to feed the energy back to the source as current will

stop continuing to flow.

Simulation of regenerative braking is done assuming the stored kinetic energy will

eventually be given up and the motor will to come to a stop with no voltage across its

terminal. So, source voltage must be gradually decreasing during braking and to keep

the output voltage constant, the reference voltage of the comparator should be

increased accordingly to increase the duty cycle of gate driving signal. The simulated

circuit is shown in Figure 4.8.

61

62

Figure 4.9: Output Voltage and Current of the Boost converter during Braking

Figure 4.10: Generation of Reference signal to vary the duty cycle of the converter

63

Figure 4.11: Boost Converter Input Power due to the kinetic energy stored in the

vehicle

Figure 4.12: Boost Converter Output Power. The amount of energy which is equal to

the area under the curve, is feed back to the source

64

4.5 SUMMARY

This chapter has suggested such a design of the converter that is capable of varying

its output voltage and at the same time limits the excess current. The two quadrant

operation of the motor enables the motor to operate at both Forward motoring and

Forward regenerative braking. For reverse motoring reverse contacts are employed to

operate the motor in opposite direction.

65

CHAPTER 5

SIMULATION OF THE OVERALL SYSTEM

5.1

INTRODUCTION

Simulated figures in this chapter are divided into two parts. Here at first the

simulation of the total system would be presented for a compound motor with

winding change over technique. The simulated figures will contain the Speed of the

vehicle, Torque of the system, Current and output power. Next the same simulation

will be done for the overall vehicle and traction system when operated by a series

motor of same power. This portion is simulated to deduce a comparison between the

proposed method and the conventional method. According to simulated result it can

very be easily found out that, the proposed method offers a better performance

because the vehicle will be operating at a higher speed compare to the case when it is

operated by series motor. To simulate the entire system three subsystems have to be

integrated with the overall system. The entire system comprises of

5.2

Compound Motor

Mechanical System (Traction Load)

SIMULATION RESULTS

All three sub systems are integrated and co-ordinated together to perform the

simulation work. The entire simulation is done for a 60 seconds run of the vehicle.

The simulated block in SIMULINK is shown in Figure.5.1.

66

67

Figure 5.2: Speed of the vehicle with winding change over technique.

The motor current is being regulated by the Hysteresis controller, always remains in

the permissible limit of operation. Hysteresis controller will be in effect whenever the

current tries to exceed the limits.

68

69

Now for the purpose of comparison the simulated results for a series motor driven

electric vehicle with same characteristics as before will be presented in the following.

70

5.3

SUMMERY

Simulation of the overall system clearly signifies the fact that, the proposed method

of winding change over feature can improve the performance of an electric vehicle

when operated with a DC motor. The conventional traction loads are operated with

DC series motor. Final Speed obtained for the vehicle with the proposed system is

around 72kmph whereas, with conventional DC series motor, the obtained maximum

speed is 54kmph. But one thing that also should be focused here that, as the proposed

method is operating at a speed 18kmph higher than the conventional method energy

consumed by the motor will be more as the resistance force due to aerodynamic drag

offered by vehicle increases with the square of the velocity and hence power required

increases with the cube of the velocity.

71

CHAPTER 6

CONCLUSION

7.1

SUMMARY

A Novel Switching technique along with a new concept is proposed for the purpose

of traction. The ideal characteristics

of an electric motor

drive for

traction

application in an electric and hybrid electric vehicle are high torque at low speed

region for fast acceleration, hill climbing and obstacle negotiation, and low

torque at high speed for normal driving. A single DC motor cannot fulfill all these

ideal requirements. But according to the proposed method of using a compound

motor with winding change over, the characteristics will be very close to the ideal

one. To minimize the power rating of the motor drive, therefore, the energy

storage requirement, at a given vehicle performance, the electric motor drive is

required to have a long constant power range to meet the torque and speed

demand.

Once again this proposed method enables the motor to maximize its

capability by prolonging its constant power. The effect of the motor characteristics

on the vehicle performance is analyzed, and the characteristics of three major

electric motors- induction motor, permanent magnet brushless DC motor and

switched reluctance motor are studied for literature review, where it has been

concluded that, though DC machines are now almost become obsolete, still it has the

maximum torque density and the most suitable characteristics for traction

application. This technique can further enhance that capability of the DC motor for

traction application as the result suggests an improvement in its performance

compare to the traditional one. Results show a better acceleration performance and

significant improvement in final speed of the vehicle. This technique minimizes the

power rating of the motor as it is operating at a longer constant power range due to

change over in its configurations. The high torque operation of the compound and

series configuration is utilized as well as the field long constant power range

operation of shunt configuration by field weakening is also being made use of. The

simulation results show that, the extended speed operation of the motor can reach up

72

to 3.5 times of the base speed which can never be obtained without the feature of

winding change over. At the same time it is also evident that, this method will

consume more power to run the vehicle and it is obvious that, the power consumption

will be more for higher speed of operation.

As stated earlier, the proposed method demands a relatively larger amount of power,

the most important task still left is to calculate the energy consumption of the vehicle

for per Kilometer of operation. This would provide the final concluding remark of

this study.

From this the Mileage of the vehicle for a given battery capacity can be very easily

determined which has not been done yet. At the same time for nominal operation of

the vehicle, the battery size and its capacity has to be determined.

Comparative study with other types motor can be done and then the motor with

optimum performance for traction application can be chosen.

Microcontroller can be used as the prime controller of the entire system which should

perform all the necessary control action and this would make the system more

optimum, flexible and adaptable to any operating condition.

Advanced algorithms like Fuzzy logic or Neuro-Fuzzy controller may be introduced

for system operation. These adaptive advanced algorithms may also be used to

replace the brushed DC motor by a Brushless DC motor which would be more

advanced and efficient compare to the conventional one.

Long constant power range of vehicle traction motor can effectively reduce

the required motor power rating for the given vehicle acceleration performance

and

at

the

same time,

the gradeability

of the vehicle

can he

enhanced

energy storage, such as the batteries. It can also simplify the transmission system

73

train can he designed with compactness, high efficiency and good reliability.

Of the three major candidates of traction motors, permanent magnet brushless

DC motor has the highest torque density. However, the constant power range is

very limited due to the difficulty of the field weakening. The constant speed

range of variable speed induction motor drives is also limited to maximum of 4

times of its base speed, even using special winding changeover technique. On the

other hand, switched reluctance motor drives inherently have favorable speedtorque characteristic for traction application. This design and simulation shows

that the extended speed constant power range can reach about 3 (3.5 times the

based speed), much higher than other kinds of electric motors, with high

operating efficiency.

74

- Project Report on Speed Control of Dc Motor by Using PWM TechniqueUploaded byPravesh Nema
- ladoux2014.pdfUploaded bynoushad
- LBC6KUploaded byKumawat Arun
- s 35102109Uploaded bySherif M. Dabour
- Analysis of Chopper Fed d.c. Drive With Pwm & Hysteresis Current Control SchemeUploaded byS Bharadwaj Reddy
- FPGA based motorize coolingUploaded byUmang yadav
- cv ziani englishUploaded bymessghati
- Static Voltage Stabilizer Igbt Pwm (Anis)Uploaded byAnieys Ahmad
- Study and Implementation of a Novel BidirectionalUploaded byArceu Campos
- ELTEK for Sale From Powerstorm 19nov14Uploaded byMorroJopal
- PEDS.2009.5385776Uploaded byHugo León
- AC DRIVESTechnical guide book.pdfUploaded byAnas Alghazali
- CONSTRUCCION Y DISEÑO DE INVERTERUploaded byestmejias
- 484756Uploaded byFares Mentseur
- UC3842 Inside SchematicsUploaded byp.c
- Introductory Presentation On switch DyanmicsUploaded byRahul Kumar
- Bose EvaluationUploaded byDvid L Cruz
- 021Uploaded byNeha Diwan
- 2332x_tocUploaded bydeepcservihoo
- Total Harmonic Distortion Analysis and Comparison of Diode Clamped Multilevel Z-Source InverterUploaded byEric Johnston
- 11358912 (1).pdfUploaded byDaniel Isaac Chaname Diaz
- paper6Uploaded bykvramanan_1
- Solid StateUploaded byTechnos_Inc
- Inverter and SV-PWMUploaded bycoep05
- Speed Control 1Uploaded byclinthen
- ATV71S383_programming_manual_EN_AAV494266_06.pdfUploaded bydimitriap
- Electric Motor PresentationUploaded byupendra35
- Accessories 2014 EnUploaded byspscribd1
- 00931078Uploaded byVIJAYPUTRA
- INTRO_Labsguru_LGEC016Uploaded byPranesh Kutty

- Recent Development in Power Electronic_contentUploaded byS.m. Ferdous
- Recent Dev in Power Electronic_finalUploaded byS.m. Ferdous
- AIPUploaded byS.m. Ferdous
- BatteryUploaded byS.m. Ferdous
- FlywheelUploaded byS.m. Ferdous
- Prc AnalysisUploaded byS.m. Ferdous
- EmbeddedLab v1.60 RemoteDocsUploaded byAshok Obuli
- Accion Control y Aplicacion de Motores ElectricosUploaded bynikoll1953
- BUSBARUploaded byS.m. Ferdous
- 3.2.3FLUX-WEAKENINGUploaded byPierumberto Pampanin
- Analog MultipliersUploaded byS.m. Ferdous
- Report Eshev FinalUploaded byS.m. Ferdous
- BatteryUploaded byS.m. Ferdous
- Ieee Qer PevUploaded byS.m. Ferdous
- Thyristor Commutation Animation VxVxyUploaded byS.m. Ferdous
- Elec Vech3Uploaded byS.m. Ferdous
- PSET_lesson08_Simulator_1_base Magnitudes and Ameters – TasksUploaded byS.m. Ferdous
- Current Sources BJTUploaded byS.m. Ferdous
- Chapter 6 ChecklistUploaded byS.m. Ferdous
- Emmc Steps Daac Lesson5Uploaded byS.m. Ferdous
- Chap 2Uploaded byS.m. Ferdous
- Cover PagesUploaded byS.m. Ferdous
- chap 1Uploaded byS.m. Ferdous
- CVUploaded byS.m. Ferdous
- Chapter 7 Checklist(1)Uploaded byS.m. Ferdous
- pe_manualUploaded bydhanjoy3827
- Chapter 1 ChecklistUploaded byS.m. Ferdous
- Project Completion Report_Road Safety Awareness Campaign in Bangladesh With Special Focus on Patuakhali - Amtoli RoadUploaded byS.m. Ferdous
- Quote for Mr.shuvo, American International University BangladeshUploaded byS.m. Ferdous

- MD_Handbook and Application Guide for High Performanse Brushless Servo Systems, 2011Uploaded byAlex Alberto Traruanca Nauco
- Trade of Electrician Induction MotorUploaded bymentong
- Thermal Modelling Investigation of Heat Paths Due to Iron Losses in Synchronous Machines 04528833Uploaded byu04f061
- Charles (Joe) Flynn -- Parallel Path TechnologyUploaded byrockrain
- ALIMAK-Scando 650 Tech Desc 9104228-107 USUploaded byramtsan
- DC Motor CalculationsUploaded byoctav12
- Regenerative Power Control for Electric BicycleUploaded bytalhak93
- EVUploaded byBIll
- Electric MotorUploaded bystallone21
- Sinpac Cap Start Run Switches Cvr_seriesUploaded bystoragebin
- Construction of DC Motor _ Yoke Poles Armature Field Winding Commutator Brushes of DC Motor _ Electrical4uUploaded byAvecc Amourr
- GE MD800Uploaded byidontlikeebooks
- 110907 NanotechnologyUploaded byAnna Bencsics
- Modeling of PmsmUploaded byMd Qutubuddin
- 19670025284_1967025284Uploaded byapi-3827338
- VenkataramananUploaded byleoh1223
- d1034Fisher 546NS Electro‐Pneumatic Transducer25x012.pdfUploaded byGrant Bloxom
- Motion Control Theory Needed in TheUploaded byapi-27637095
- applicationsof8051microcontrollers-121202122429-phpapp02Uploaded byPrasad Nagavara
- 0072423706-ElectricUploaded byRupesh Sushir
- SEW Eurodrive GearmotorsUploaded byRhiiee
- Assignment 2 SampleUploaded bynabeel hassan ali
- Speed Control of Separately Excited Dc Motor Using Fuzzy Logic ControllerUploaded byseventhsensegroup
- Cat2007 Ing HenfluidUploaded byRodrigo Pacheco
- Dynamics Lab MANUAL New PrintUploaded byMartin De Boras Pragash
- Hand Book- VI Sem - 2015-16Uploaded bymyanamis
- 745Uploaded bytateneni
- DC Motor ReportUploaded bybafulcher
- Module 6 - DC Machines v2.pdfUploaded byHazel Marie Ignacio Peralta
- Br Cat Bmd Std Eng r02 2Uploaded byAnonymous yPWi8p3KkA