You are on page 1of 2

Speaker Nancy Pelosi | News Room | Fact Check

11/13/14, 10:53 AM

Health Insurance Reform Mythbuster - Health Reform And Insurance


Premiums
12/01/2009
Opponents of health insurance reform continue to spread myths about the recently-passed Affordable Health Care for America
Act. For example, they are claiming that health reform would increase premiums for most of Americas families. But the facts
continue to knock these myths downincluding a brand-new report from the independent Congressional Budget Office.
MYTH: The House health insurance reform bill would result in higher premiums.
FACT: An analysis of the House bill by noted MIT health care economist Jonathan Gruber concludes that the bill
would result in lower premiums than under current law for the millions of Americans using the newly-established
Health Insurance Exchange including those who are not receiving affordability credits to help them purchase
coverage. (The Health Insurance Exchange is for those without access to affordable employer-sponsored coverage.) As
Gruber states: the premiums that individuals will face in the new exchanges established by this legislation are considerably
lower than what they would face in the non-group insurance market [under current law], due to the market reforms put in place
by the House plan, the mandate on individuals to participate regardless of health, and the market economies of new exchanges.
The Gruber analysis shows that, on the Exchange, a family at 425 percent of poverty (whose income of $93,710 means
that they would receive no affordability credits) would see their premiums reduced by $1,260 or 12 percent compared to
current law. Similarly, the Gruber analysis shows that, on the Exchange, an individual at 425 percent of poverty (whose
income of $46,030 means that they would receive no affordability credits) would see their premiums reduced by $470 or
12 percent.
The annual savings are much larger for lower income populations that receive affordability credits. Under the House bill,
when the bills affordability credits are taken into account, a family at 275% of poverty (income of $60,640) would save
$5,030, or 47 percent in premiums compared to current law and a family at 175 percent of poverty (income of $38,590)
would save $9,050 or 84 percent in premiums compared to current law.
Gruber also points out that, even as individuals and families on the Exchange are paying less, they will be getting more:
The coverage those on the Exchange get under the House plan would be better than todays typical coverage in the nongroup market.
For example, it would protect individuals and families from high out-of-pocket costs.
Thats in addition to other consumer protections in the bill like ending discrimination based on pre-existing conditions
and guaranteeing that your coverage wont be dropped or watered down when you get sick or need it most.
New CBO Analysis
Furthermore, for the vast majority of Americans who get their health insurance in the employer-sponsored group market,
the Congressional Budget Office has just released an estimate that, under the quite similar Senate bill, premiums would
either be reduced or stay the same. Specifically, for the millions in the employer-sponsored large group market, premiums
would be reduced by up to 3 percent or stay the same. And for all Americans, copays would be eliminated for preventive
care and out-of-pocket expenses would be capped.
Like Gruber, CBO found that for Americans using the non-group market, their coverage would significantly improve under
http://web.archive.org/web/20100304070108/http://www.speaker.gov/newsroom/factcheck?id=0142

Page 1 of 2

Speaker Nancy Pelosi | News Room | Fact Check

11/13/14, 10:53 AM

the Senate bill. The CBO data indicate that the Senate bill would reduce premiums by 14 to 20 percent for people in the
non-group market when comparing plans that provide equivalent coverage.
For the Gruber analysis, please click here.
For the CBO analysis, please click here.

http://web.archive.org/web/20100304070108/http://www.speaker.gov/newsroom/factcheck?id=0142

Page 2 of 2