You are on page 1of 31

In the Court of Common Pleas

First Judicial District of Pennsylvania


Bag of Holdings, LLC

Jury Trial Demanded

Plainti,
v.

Filed and Attested by


PROTHONOTARY
17 NOV 2014 11:20 pm
J. OSTROWSKI

November Term

City of Philadelphia and


Kenyatta Johnson, individually No.
and in his Ocial Capacity as
Councilman for the Second
District of Philadelphia

Defendants.
NOTICE TO DEFEND

AVISO

You have been sued in Court. If you wish to


defend against the claims set forth in the
following pages, you must take action within
twenty (20) days after this Complaint and
Notice arc served, by entering a written
appearance personally or by attorney and filing
in writing with the Court your defenses or
objections to the claims set forth against you.
You are warned that if you fail to do so the
case may proceed without you and a judgment
may be entered against you by the Court
without further notice for any money claimed
in the Complaint or for any other claim or
relief requested by the plaintiff. You may lose
money or property or other rights important to
you.
YOU SHOULD TAKE THIS PAPER TO
YOUR LAWYER AT ONCE. IF YOU DO
NOT HAVE A LAWYER OR CANNOT
AFFORD ONE, GO TO OR TELEPHONE
THE OFFICE SET FORTH BELOW TO FIND
OUT WHERE YOU CAN GET LEGAL
HELP.

Lo(a) han demandado a usted en la corte. Si


usted quiere defenderse de estas demandas
expuestas en las pginas siguientes, usted tiene
veinte (20) das de plazo al partir de la fecha de
la demanda y la notificacin. Hace falta asentar
una comparecencia escrita o en persona o con
un abogado y entregar a la corte en forma
escrita sus defensas o sus objeciones a las
demandas en contra de su persona. Sea avisado
que si usted no se defiende, la corte tomar
medidas y puede continuar la demanda en
contra suya sin previo aviso o notificacin.
Adems, la corte puede decidir a favor del
demandante y requiere que usted cumpla con
todas las provisiones de esta demanda. Usted
puede perder dinero o sus propiedades u otros
derechos importantes para usted.

Philadelphia Bar Association


Lawyer Referral and Information Service
1101 Market Street, 11th Floor
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 191072911
Telephone: (215) 238-6333

LLEVE ESTA. DEMANDA A UN ABOGADO


I N M E D I ATA M E N T E . S I N O T I E N E
ABOGADO O SI NO TIENE EL DINERO
S U F I C I E M I E N T E D E PA G A R TA L
SERVICIO, VAYA EN PERSONA O LLAME
POR TELFONO A LA OFICINA CUYA
DIRECCIN SE ENCUENTRA ESCRITA
ABAJO PARA AVERIGUAR DONDE SE
PUEDE CONSEGUIR ASISTENCIA LEGAL.
Asociacin de Licenciados de Filadelfia
Servicio de Referencia E Informacin Legal
1101 Market Street, 11th Floor
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 191072911
Telfono: (215) 2386333

Case ID: 141101744

By: A. Jordan Rushie


Jordan@FishtownLaw.com
Pa. Id. 209066
M U LV I H I L L & R U S H I E L LC
2424 East York Street Suite 316
Philadelphia, PA 19125
215.385.5291
In the Court of Common Pleas
First Judicial District of Pennsylvania
Bag of Holdings, LLC

Jury Trial Demanded

Plainti,
v.

November Term

City of Philadelphia and Keny-


atta Johnson, individually and No.
in his Ocial Capacity as City
of Philadelphia Councilman
for the Second District

Defendants.
Complaint
Bag of Holdings, LLC brings this Complaint against the City of
Philadelphia and Kenyatta Johnson, through its attorney A. Jordan
Rushie, and alleges the following:
S U M M A RY O F T H E C A S E

This matter involves a pay to play scheme for vacant lots in the
Second District of Philadelphia. Councilman Kenyatta Johnson is
trying to sell city owned properties to political insiders and demanding purchasers use his preferred developers, in what is a flagrant violation of the Citys documented policies.

Case ID: 141101744

Bag of Holdings LLC v. City of Philadelphia, et. al.


Complaint

PA RT I E S

1. Bag of Holdings LLC, is a business organized under the laws of


the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, with a principal place of
business at 1501 Dillon Road, Maple Glen, PA, 19002.
2. The City of Philadelphia is a Municipality of the first class in the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
3. Councilman Kenyatta Johnson is an elected councilperson for
the City of Philadelphia, with an oce located at City Hall,
Room580, Philadelphia, PA 19107.
4. Councilman Johnson is the councilperson for the Second District of the City of Philadelphia, which includes Point Breeze.
5. Kenyatta Johnson is named individually and in his Ocial Capacity as City of Philadelphia Councilman for the Second District.
FAC T UA L B AC KG R O U N D

6. Bag of Holdings LLC is a real estate development company


which engages in development in the Second District of Philadelphia.
7. As part of its business, Bag of Holdings purchases vacant lots
with the intent of redeveloping them.
8. The City of Philadelphia owns many vacant lots which Bag of
Holdings wished to purchase in the Second District.
9. City of Philadelphia policy requires an open competitive sales
process when multiple expressions of interest are made by developers.
10. A true and correct copy of the Citys Sale and Development Policy is attached as Exhibit A, and is referred to in the Complaint
as the City Sale Policy.
# of 6
2

Case ID: 141101744

Bag of Holdings LLC v. City of Philadelphia, et. al.


Complaint

11. The purpose of the City Sale Policy is to [c]onvey land in a unified, predictable, timely and transparent process. (Exhibit A).
12. Under the City Sale Policy, [o]pen Market Sales such as broker
listings, the use of the Multiple Listing Service, web sites or other recognized method of advertising may be used to encourage
broad participation in the sale of selected properties. (Exhibit
A).
13. Bag of Holdings LLC is a Qualified Purchaser under the City
Sale Policy.
14. Plainti has made multiple Expressions of Interest on properties located in the Second District and Point Breeze, in accordance with the City Sale Policy.
15. However, many properties the Plainti has made Expressions of
Interest on are scheduled for sale to political insiders of
Councilman Kenyatta Johnson.
16. On information and belief, certain political insiders made campaign contributions to Councilman Johnson or performed other favors.
17. Among other things, those deemed political insiders by Councilman Kenyatta Johnson are able to circumvent the competitive
bidding process mandated by the City Sale Policy.
18. Certain properties are scheduled for sale to the political insiders
without following the City Sale Policy, or notice to Bag of Holdings LLC.
19. For instance, in just the last three months, at least seventeen out
of twenty-two properties scheduled for sale by the City are to
political insiders.
20.Some of these political insiders include, but are not limited to,
Hayman Construction LLC, Tremelle Hayman, and Felton
Hayman.

# of 6
3

Case ID: 141101744

Bag of Holdings LLC v. City of Philadelphia, et. al.


Complaint

21. Many of these political insiders are not Qualified Purchasers


under the City Sale Policy.
22. For instance, Felton Hayman pled guilty to third-degree murder
charges in connection with the killing of a rival drug dealer associated with the Junior Black Mafia. (Exhibit B).
23. Hayman has also had a property foreclosed on as recently as
2014 the same year Hayman Construction LLC was formed.
24. In selling the properties to political insiders, the Defendants
ignored Expressions of Interest from other real estate developers, including Bag of Holdings LLC.
25. Certain properties are currently scheduled for sale under their
actual market value, to the detriment of all Philadelphia taxpayers.
26. On information and belief, as part of the arrangement, Kenyatta Johnson demands purchasers of these properties use political
insiders such as Hayman Construction for the development.
27. The above described actions essentially cut Bag of Holdings out
of the competitive bidding process.
28. On information and belief, the above described sales were eectuated by Councilman Kenyatta Johnson.
29. The City Sales Policy mandates that [a]ll real estate transactions
are governed by City and State laws and rules that generally prohibit, among other things, conflicts of interest, the disclosure of
confidential information, and the representation of another by
a City ocial or employee in a transaction with the City.
30.Defendant Kenyatta Johnson violated this policy by eectuating
the sale of certain lots to unqualified political insiders, often
under market value.

# of 6
4

Case ID: 141101744

Bag of Holdings LLC v. City of Philadelphia, et. al.


Complaint

Count 1
Violations of Substantive Due Process and Equal Protection
Against All Defendants
31. On information and belief, the Defendants, acting under color
of state law, intentionally scheduled for sale properties in the
Second District to political insiders.
32. In the alternative, the Defendants, acting under color of state
law, arbitrarily treated Bag of Holdings dierently from other
similarly situated real estate developers.
33. Plainti was never given any type of hearing or notice before
Defendants unfairly scheduled for sale properties in the Second
District to political insiders.
34. Defendants did not provide substantive or procedural due
process of law to Bag of Holdings.
35. The Defendants actions essentially cut Bag of Holdings out of
the competitive bidding process.
36. Defendants caused Plainti to suer by their wrongful conduct
in violation of the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendment to the
United States Constitution and Pennsylvania Constitution, actionable through 32 U.S.C. 1983, et. seq., and state law.
37. As a result, Bag of Holdings has sustained monetary damages
and is unable to develop certain properties in Point Breeze.
Count II
Civil Conspiracy
Against All Defendants
38. Upon information and belief, the Defendants agreed among
themselves to ensure that certain properties in Point Breeze
were scheduled for sale to political insiders.

5# of 6

Case ID: 141101744

Bag of Holdings LLC v. City of Philadelphia, et. al.


Complaint

39. One or more of the Defendants performed one or more overt


acts in furtherance of their conspiracy, which acts were not privileged.
40.Each defendant is liable for the harm Bag of Holdings LLC has
suered and will suer as a result of the conspiracy.
WHEREFORE,

Plainti, Bag of Holdings LLC demand judgment in


its favor and against all defendants in an amount exceeding
$50,000.00, including attorneys fees, statutory damages, treble
damages, court costs, expenses, punitive damages, and whatever
other relief this Court finds necessary, just and proper.
Respectfully Submitted,

#
A. Jordan Rushie
M U LV I H I L L & R U S H I E L LC
2424 East York Street Suite 316
Philadelphia, PA 19125
215.385.5291

Attorneys for Bag of Holdings, LLC

# of 6
6

Case ID: 141101744

Verification
I, Michael Pollack, am the sole member of Bag of Holdings LLC. I
hereby state that the facts above set forth are true and correct (or are
true and correct to the best of my knowledge, information and belief) and that I expect to be able to prove the same at a hearing held
in this matter. I understand that the statements herein are made
subject to the penalties of 18 Pa.C.S. 4904 (relating to unsworn
falsification to authorities).

Dated: November 17, 2014

/S/
Michael Pollack

Case ID: 141101744


Exhibit A

Case ID: 141101744

City of Philadelphia

POLICIES FOR THE SALE AND REUSE OF CITY OWNED PROPERTY

April 20, 2012


Final Version

Case ID: 141101744

Guiding Principles ........................................................................................................................... 1


Applicability..................................................................................................................................... 1
Qualified Purchasers & Bids ............................................................................................................ 1
Appropriate & Timely Development of Properties ......................................................................... 2
Approaches to the Sale of Property ................................................................................................ 4
Open and Competitive Market Sales .......................................................................................... 4
Listed Direct Sales ....................................................................................................................... 4
Discounted Sales ......................................................................................................................... 4
Discounted Sales ............................................................................................................................. 5
Affordable Housing ................................................................................................................. 5
Economic Development Projects ............................................................................................ 5
Community Development Projects ......................................................................................... 5
Self-amortizing Second Mortgage .......................................................................................... 6
Community Gardens ............................................................................................................... 6
Side Yards ................................................................................................................................ 6
Discontinued Programs ........................................................................................................... 7
Urban Agriculture ........................................................................................................................... 8
Individual Gardens .................................................................................................................. 8
Community Gardens ............................................................................................................... 8
Market and Community-Supported Farms ............................................................................. 9
Other Uses ...................................................................................................................................... 9
Citizen-Initiated Tax Sales ............................................................................................................... 9
Ethics ............................................................................................................................................. 10

4.2012

Case ID: 141101744

Guiding Principles
This policy shall be used to promote and regulate the sale and reuse of City properties.
The sale and reuse of City properties shall at all times be consistent with the following guiding
principles.
o Encourage the development and reuse of vacant properties consistent with the City of
Philadelphias Comprehensive Plan (Philadelphia2035), and other City-approved and
accepted plans.
o Eliminate blight and revitalize neighborhoods.
o Strengthen the Citys tax base.
o Sell, at market value, properties without an adopted public purpose, and discount
properties that provide significant community benefits.
o Convey land in a unified, predictable, timely and transparent process.

Applicability
These policies apply to the real property inventories owned by the Philadelphia Redevelopment
Authority, the Philadelphia Housing Development Corporation, and the surplus inventory held
by the City of Philadelphias Department of Public Property. These agencies are collectively
referred to as The City throughout this document, and are each responsible for decisionmaking during the disposition process and adherence to these policies.
All expressions of interest for property will be made through the Philadelphia Redevelopment
Authority (PRA).
During the review of requests for property under these policies, the City may, at its discretion,
elect not to convey the requested property. Under such circumstances, the City will provide a
reason for this decision.

Qualified Purchasers & Bids


All purchasers of City-owned property must fulfill their commitments to the City and to their
neighbors, which includes paying property taxes and maintaining properties in accordance with
all municipal codes and ordinances.
A Qualified Purchaser is defined as one who is in good standing on all municipal obligations; and
Does not own any property that is subject to any significant unremediated violation of City
codes and ordinances; and
Has not been an owner in a completed Philadelphia tax foreclosure proceeding within the
previous five years; and
Does not appear as the owner of record on the Philadelphia District Attorneys list of land
that has been confiscated due to criminal activity.

4.2012

Case ID: 141101744

All purchasers must submit disclosures as required by the City.


A Qualified Bid is defined as one that includes:
1) Adequate plans for development; and
2) Demonstrated capacity to complete work proposed; and
3) Proven financial resources; and
4) Demonstrated ongoing operating capacity, and
5) Is submitted by a Qualified Purchaser

Appropriate & Timely Development of Properties


The City expects that properties will be developed in an appropriate and timely manner
according to a written agreement. To ensure that these expectations are met, the City will
place conditions on land it conveys to achieve the agreed upon outcome and will follow up with
a systematic review of these agreements after property has been conveyed.
Applicants will be expected to develop and use property acquired under these policies in a
timely manner. This requirement will be enforced either through reverter provisions in the
deed, or by requiring that property be conveyed simultaneously with construction financing
closing. New owners will:
Ensure consistency with the City of Philadelphias Comprehensive Plan (Philadelphia2035)
and other City-approved and accepted plans
Comply with fair housing and marketing regulations
Conform with current zoning requirements, or obtain the appropriate zoning permit
Maintain the property in accordance with all City codes and ordinances
Note: The City reserves the right to decline any offer to purchase City-owned property if the sale
does not advance the City's goals or comport with its policies for property disposition. If an offer
is rejected, a reason will be provided for the objection upon request in a timely manner.
Site Control: Options and Holds
The City recognizes that developers often require legally recognizable site control as part of the
development process. The City may at times execute contingent agreements of sale or option
agreements to allow developers to pursue financing and other approvals necessary for
development.
Agreements or contracts for this purpose must meet the following conditions:
The applicant must be a Qualified Purchaser
The applicant will be responsible for property maintenance, insurance, and utilities
The timeframe must limited to one year or less and may be renewed solely at the Citys
discretion

4.2012

Case ID: 141101744

The proposed use must be consistent with the City of Philadelphias Comprehensive Plan
(Philadelphia2035) and other City-approved and accepted plans.
The applicant may not use or move into the property
An option fee will be due upon execution
Not-for-profits and city-subsidized projects may be exempt from a fee
The contract terms will be public information in accordance with applicable law.
Applicant must have a letter of support from the District Council Member.
Requests for Proposals/Qualifications
If the City has a specific planned use for a parcel, a Request for Proposals (RFP) or Request for
Qualifications (RFQ) will be issued to identify and select a potential developer. The RFP format
allows the City to explain the planned use and any further restrictions that might be placed on
the developer or successive owners of the property.
RFP will be widely advertised to encourage broad participation.
Selection criteria will include factors such as developer capacity and proposed
development outcomes as well as the price.
The price established through this process will be considered the market value of the
property, and it must be acceptable to the City.
The RFP may be developed in consultation with City Council, the City Planning
Commission, and other stakeholders as appropriate.

4.2012

Case ID: 141101744

Approaches to the Sale of Property


The sale of City property is intended to promote the greatest possible active reuse of parcels in
the Citys inventory, and will be accomplished through one of the following means:
Note: In accordance with City Ordinance 110848, all properties 10,000 square feet or larger will
be subject to public notice posting on the property that will include pertinent information
concerning the potential sale and potential buyer. All sales transactions will be made available
for public review via the website.
Open and Competitive Market Sales
Open Market Sales such as broker listings, the use of the Multiple Listing Service, web sites or
other recognized method of advertising may be used to encourage broad participation in the
sale of selected properties.
Asking prices may be established using appraisal, competitive market analysis, or
Automated Valuation Model (AVM).
Properties will be placed on the market for a duration that will allow for broad
engagement by potential buyers.
The City retains its rights to approve or reject the best Qualified Offer, based on clear
criteria, including price.

Listed Direct Sales


Available properties will be published on a designated City website with an asking price.
Individual requests for properties will be accepted and reviewed on an ongoing basis through
the Philadelphia Redevelopment Authority.
Qualified Applicants will be allowed to purchase property at the listed price.
When a purchaser offers less than the asking price for a property, or more than one
person wishes to purchase the property, the City will use the Open Market Sales
approach to obtain the best offer for the property.

Discounted Sales
The City may convey a property for a discounted price to support public purposes such as
affordable housing, economic development, community development, or side yards. If a
property is identified for one of the following uses, the City will evaluate the proposal and
property request to determine if the proposed project provides significant, visible community
benefits that would merit the proposed reduction in sales proceeds.

4.2012

Case ID: 141101744

Discounted Sales
The following programs qualify for discounted pricing:
Affordable Housing
Developments that provide affordable housing as defined under federal guidelines may acquire
property for a discount. Affordable housing projects do not have to be directly subsidized by
the City to qualify for discounted pricing. Preference may be given to affordable and mixedincome housing developments that are consistent with major goals of the City of Philadelphias
Comprehensive Plan (Philadelphia2035) and other City-approved and accepted plans including
providing housing in locations that connect residents directly to a) employment opportunities,
b) public transit, and c) basic services.

Economic Development Projects


Developments that advance the Citys economic development goals as articulated in the Citys
Comprehensive Plan (Philadelphia2035) and other City-approved and accepted plans to
promote economic development may be eligible for discounted pricing at the discretion of the
City. Criteria include but are not limited to:
Leveraging of previous public investments in infrastructure, job creation, and economic
development
Catalytic projects with the potential to spur additional private investment in
underperforming commercial corridors, neighborhood centers, and areas of regional
economic significance as identified in the Citys Comprehensive Plan (Philadelphia2035)
and other City-approved and accepted plans Projects that return industrial land to
productive use in areas identified as appropriate for industrial development
Projects that share costs or make investments related to significant public
improvements, including but not limited to the upgrading of public utilities and the
rehabilitation or provision of new public infrastructure;

Community Development Projects


A Qualified Bid that proposes significant incremental community benefits may be eligible for
discounted pricing at the discretion of the City. Community benefits can include but are not
limited to:
Support for existing community facilities or provision of space for new community
facilities such as libraries, recreation centers, health centers, computing centers, and
playgrounds;
Significant improvements to community infrastructure including the greening of
schoolyards or recreation center yards to achieve stormwater management, public
recreation, or community gardening goals as identified the City of Philadelphias
Comprehensive Plan (Philadelphia2035) and other City-approved and accepted plans
Creation of new infrastructure or support for existing infrastructure to improve

4.2012

Case ID: 141101744

safety and mobility for children, seniors, and other pedestrians, including sidewalk
improvements, pedestrian plazas, traffic medians, or easements for trails

Self-amortizing Second Mortgage


For properties conveyed for a discounted price, a self-amortizing mortgage for the difference
between the value and the discounted price will be executed by the purchaser to ensure that if
the property is re-sold to another party within a specific time frame, the buyer will not benefit
unfairly from the discounted price offered by the City. The Self-Amortizing Mortgage will not
require any payments by the purchaser of the property if the property is used in conformance
with the originally agreed upon terms for the duration of the mortgage.

The length of the mortgage will be 10 years from the date of purchase
The amount of the obligation will decrease by 10% every year for 10 years
Upon completion of the ten year time frame the City will satisfy the mortgage
If the purchaser wants to sell the property before the 10 year expiration date of the
mortgage, the City must receive the amount owed on the mortgage before the
mortgage will be satisfied.
The market value may be established through any suitable method at the Citys
discretion.
This mortgage may be assumed by heirs and successors to the original purchaser.

Community Gardens
Community gardens that have a sustained track record of excellent maintenance, broad
community involvement and support and financial capacity may be conveyed to an institution
that promises to maintain and care for the property for this purpose subject to a right of
reversion by the City. A deed restriction will ensure compliance with this goal.

Side Yards
Property may be transferred to individuals for nominal consideration in accordance with the
following:
o Must be vacant land adjacent to the applicants residential property, with a common
boundary line on either side or behind the property.
o Must be located on a block that is predominantly occupied.
o In the event that multiple adjacent property owners desire to acquire the same
side lot, the lot may be transferred to the highest bidder for the property, or
subdivided upon mutual agreement by both adjoining property owners.
o Maximum combined Lot Value: $15,000
o Maximum combined Lot Size: 3000 sq ft
o Associated costs will be paid by the applicant, including all relevant taxes, fees, and
title insurance.
4.2012

Case ID: 141101744

Eligibility Requirements for Applicants for Side Yards:


The applicant must be the owner of an adjacent property and using that property as
his/her primary residence.
An applicant may buy up to two (2) adjacent lots, as long as one of those lots must
be adjacent to the applicants property.
The applicant must be a Qualified Purchaser, as defined above.
Note: Written notice to adjacent property will be sent via U.S. mail, and/or other such
notice, will be given to all adjacent owner-occupants when an application is filed to
acquire a side yard. If more than one party is interested in purchasing the property, the
City will sell the property to the highest bidder.

Discontinued Programs
At the Citys discretion, property may be conveyed under the terms of discontinued programs
for those applicants who applied for and were awarded property under previous program
guidelines, and can demonstrate continuous effort and completion of their obligations under
the original program terms. Applicants will be subject to the Qualified Purchaser & Bid
provisions, in addition to the Ethics provisions of these policies.

4.2012

Case ID: 141101744

Urban Agriculture
The City supports the use of vacant land for urban agriculture that improves the quality of life in
the Citys neighborhoods.

Individual Garden Licenses


An individual garden is defined as a publicly-owned property for which a person is given
temporary access to farm or garden and maintains for their personal use. The intent is to
provide an interim use for the land to eliminate blight and improve safety until development is
possible. The City expects that the majority of individual gardens will be temporary, and the
land will still be available for development.
The Individual Garden Agreement (IGA) will last for one year, and may begin and end at any
time throughout the year. IGAs are time-limited agreements that both the City and gardener
may terminate at any time, with or without cause, upon prior written notice to the other party.
The City will use reasonable efforts to avoid terminating the urban garden agreement between
April 1 and November 1. IGAs may be renewed annually at the discretion of the City.
The City expects that individual gardens will be maintained throughout the term of the IGA.
Maintenance standards will be provided in writing to all applicants.
Acceptable Uses
The gardener may enter and use the property only for the following non-commercial, gardening
purposes:
To grow food, flowers, ornamental plants, and other landscaping.
To compost in rodent-resistant containers.
Certain construction improvements as allowed by the City and agreed to in writing.

Community Garden Licenses


A community garden is defined as an area managed and maintained by a group of individuals to
grow and harvest food crops or non-food crops (such as flowers) for personal or group
consumption, for donation, or for sale that is incidental in nature. A community garden area
may be divided into separate garden plots or orchard areas for cultivation by one or more
individuals or may be farmed collectively by members of the group. A community garden may
include common areas (such as hand tool storage sheds) maintained and used by the group.
Community gardens may be used for recreational purposes, and improvements to facilitate
such purposes may be allowed on a case by case basis upon review by the City and with
community support.
Community Gardens must be sponsored by a local organization and are eligible for up to five
year Community Garden Agreements (CGA), to be administered by the City and may be
renewed at the discretion of the City and as authorized by the respective district Councilperson.
4.2012

Case ID: 141101744

Additional Requirements for Community Gardens:


Secure and maintain insurance acceptable to the City
Provide maintenance plan and description of community benefits / programming
Acceptable Uses
The gardeners may enter and use the property only for the following non-commercial,
gardening purposes:
To grow food, flowers, ornamental plants, and other landscaping.
To compost in rodent-resistant containers.
Certain construction improvements as allowed by the City and agreed to in writing

Market and Community-Supported Farms


A market farm is defined as an area managed and maintained by an individual or group of
individuals to grow and harvest food crops or non-food crops (such as flowers) for sale or
distribution that is not incidental in nature.
Lease terms are variable and will be established by the City on an individual basis.
Additional Requirements for Market and Community-Supported Farms:
Secure and maintain insurance acceptable to the City
Submit a business plan / feasibility study
Provide the applicable neighborhood/district councilperson letter of support Any
additional constructed improvements must meet the terms of the City of Philadelphias
Zoning Code and must be approved by the City in writing.

Other Uses
The City reserves the right to license the use of property for a temporary use such as a
community event, pop-up activity, farmers market or other such use. The terms of such a
license will be determined on a case by case basis, and may require insurance coverage and
other costs.

Citizen-Initiated Tax Sales


To facilitate the reuse of privately owned tax delinquent properties, the City will allow citizens
to initiate a tax sale proceeding by posting a deposit with the City. When such a deposit is
received the City will prioritize and process the subject property for an upcoming tax sale. This
deposit will be considered the opening bid at the sale, and will be returned to the individual if
that person is not the successful bidder at the sale.

4.2012

Case ID: 141101744

Ethics
Home Rule Charter and Philadelphia Code requirements
The City of Philadelphia is committed to ethical and transparent processes for the
administration of vacant land. All real estate transactions are governed by City and State laws
and rules that generally prohibit, among other things, conflicts of interest, the disclosure of
confidential information, and the representation of another by a City official or employee in a
transaction with the City.
Financial Assistance
Any grant, loan, tax incentive, bond financing subsidy for land purchase or otherwise, or other
form of assistance that is realized by or provided to a person in the amount of $50,000 or more
through the authority or approval of the City, is by law considered Financial Assistance under
Chapter 17-1400 of the Philadelphia Code. Financial Assistance recipients must meet eligibility
requirements by disclosing their political contributions. Financial Assistance includes the
transfer of City property for less than market value. Recipients of Financial Assistance must
comply with campaign contribution limits and must disclose campaign contributions for five
years after receiving Financial Assistance. They must also disclose solicitations for any reason
from any City official.
For more information on these requirements, please see www.phila.gov/integrityworks. Any
person inside or outside of City government with a concern that the disposition or
administration of City property is unethical or violates the Citys Financial Assistance
requirements should contact the Citys Chief Integrity Officer at 215.686.2178 or Inspector
General at 215.686.1770.
The City shall maintain and make available for public review and inspection:
An inventory of real property owned by the City of Philadelphia
A record of all real property conveyed to other parties, including the price for which the
property was conveyed, the party to which the property was conveyed, and the use to
which the property was/will be put.
Reports shall be prepared and posted for public review on an annual basis.

4.2012

10

Case ID: 141101744


Exhibit B

Case ID: 141101744

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY


DOCKET
Docket Number: CP-51-CR-0509927-1991

CRIMINAL DOCKET
Court Case
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
v.
Felton Hayman
CASE INFORMATION

Page 1 of 9

Judge Assigned: O'Keefe, Joseph D.

Date Filed: 05/14/1991

OTN: M 480044-5

Originating Docket No: MC-51-CR-0410631-1991

LOTN:

Initial Issuing Authority:

Final Issuing Authority:

Arresting Agency: Philadelphia Pd

Arresting Officer: Affiant

Initiation Date: 05/14/1991

Complaint/Incident #:
Case Local Number Type(s)

Case Local Number(s)

Legacy Docket Number

C9105099278

Police Incident Number

8935074966

Legacy Microfilm Number

01000732

District Control Number

8935074966

RELATED CASES
Related Docket No

Related Case Caption

Related Court

Association Reason

Joined Codefendant Cases


CP-51-CR-0509925-1991

Comm. v. Perry, Curtis

CP-01-51-Crim

Joined Codefendant Cases

CP-51-CR-0509923-1991

Comm. v. Coleman, Patrick

CP-01-51-Crim

Joined Codefendant Cases

CP-51-CR-0509922-1991

Comm. v. Maximillian, El

CP-01-51-Crim

Joined Codefendant Cases

STATUS INFORMATION
Case Status:

Closed

Status Date
12/03/2010

Processing Status

07/09/2009

Sentenced/Penalty Imposed

06/05/2009

Awaiting Sentencing

06/05/2009

Awaiting PSI

02/19/1993

Completed

05/14/1991

Migrated Case (Active)

Arrest Date:

04/10/1991

Complaint Date:

05/14/1991

Completed

CALENDAR EVENTS
Case Calendar
Event Type

Schedule
Start Date

Start
Time

Sentencing

07/06/2009

9:30 am

Room

Judge Name

Schedule
Status

304

Judge Joseph D. O'Keefe

Scheduled

DEFENDANT INFORMATION
Date Of Birth:

05/18/1968

City/State/Zip: PHILA., PA 19100

CASE PARTICIPANTS
Participant Type

Name

Defendant

Hayman, Felton

CHARGES
CPCMS 9082

Printed: 11/17/2014

Recent entries made in the court filing offices may not be immediately reflected on these docket sheets. Neither the courts of the Unified Judicial
System of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania nor the Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts assume any liability for inaccurate or delayed
data, errors or omissions on these reports. Docket Sheet information should not be used in place of a criminal history background check which can
only be provided by the Pennsylvania State Police. Moreover an employer who does not comply with the provisions of the Criminal History Record
Information Act may be subject to civil liability as set forth in 18 Pa.C.S. Section 9183.

Case ID: 141101744

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY


DOCKET
Docket Number: CP-51-CR-0509927-1991

CRIMINAL DOCKET
Court Case
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
v.
Felton Hayman
CHARGES
Seq.

Orig Seq.

Grade

Page 2 of 9

Statute

Statute Description

Offense Dt.

OTN

18 2502

MURDER

08/10/1989

M 480044-5

18 2503

VOLUNTARY MANSLAUGHTER

08/10/1989

M 480044-5

18 2504

INVOLUNTARY MANSLAUGHTER

08/10/1989

M 480044-5

18 6106

CARRYING FIREARMS WITHOUT LICENSE

08/10/1989

M 480044-5

18 6106

FIREARMS WITHOUT LICENSE-IN AUTO

08/10/1989

M 480044-5

18 6108

08/10/1989

M 480044-5

18 903

CARRYING FIRE ARMS/PUBLIC STREET


OR PLACE
CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY

08/10/1989

M 480044-5

18 907

POSSESSING INSTRUMENTS OF CRIME

08/10/1989

M 480044-5

18 907

M 480044-5

10

10

18 6106

POSSESSING INSTRUMENTS OF CRIME


WEAPON
CARRYING FIREARMS WITHOUT LICENSE

08/10/1989
08/10/1989

M 480044-5

11

11

18 6106

FIREARMS WITHOUT LICENSE-IN AUTO

08/10/1989

M 480044-5

12

12

18 6108

08/10/1989

M 480044-5

13

13

18 903

CARRYING FIRE ARMS/PUBLIC STREET


OR PLACE
CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY

08/10/1989

M 480044-5

14

14

18 907

POSSESSING INSTRUMENTS OF CRIME

08/10/1989

M 480044-5

15

15

18 907

08/10/1989

M 480044-5

16

16

18 2702

POSSESSING INSTRUMENTS OF CRIME


WEAPON
AGGRAVATED ASSAULT

08/10/1989

M 480044-5

17

17

18 2701

SIMPLE ASSAULT

08/10/1989

M 480044-5

18

18

18 2702

AGGRAVATED ASSAULT

08/10/1989

M 480044-5

19

19

18 2701

SIMPLE ASSAULT

08/10/1989

M 480044-5

20

20

18 907

POSSESSING INSTRUMENTS OF CRIME

08/10/1989

M 480044-5

21

21

18 907

M 480044-5

22

22

18 6106

POSSESSING INSTRUMENTS OF CRIME


WEAPON
CARRYING FIREARMS WITHOUT LICENSE

08/10/1989
08/10/1989

M 480044-5

23

23

18 6106

FIREARMS WITHOUT LICENSE-IN AUTO

08/10/1989

M 480044-5

24

24

18 6108

08/10/1989

M 480044-5

25

25

18 903

CARRYING FIRE ARMS/PUBLIC STREET


OR PLACE
CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY

08/10/1989

M 480044-5

26

26

18 911

CORRUPT ORGANIZATIONS

08/10/1989

M 480044-5

DISPOSITION SENTENCING/PENALTIES
Disposition
Case Event
Sequence/Description
Sentencing Judge
Sentence/Diversion Program Type

Disposition Date
Offense Disposition
Sentence Date

Final Disposition
Grade
Section

Incarceration/Diversionary Period

Credit For Time Served


Start Date

Sentence Conditions
CPCMS 9082

Printed: 11/17/2014

Recent entries made in the court filing offices may not be immediately reflected on these docket sheets. Neither the courts of the Unified Judicial
System of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania nor the Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts assume any liability for inaccurate or delayed
data, errors or omissions on these reports. Docket Sheet information should not be used in place of a criminal history background check which can
only be provided by the Pennsylvania State Police. Moreover an employer who does not comply with the provisions of the Criminal History Record
Information Act may be subject to civil liability as set forth in 18 Pa.C.S. Section 9183.

Case ID: 141101744

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY


DOCKET
Docket Number: CP-51-CR-0509927-1991

CRIMINAL DOCKET
Court Case
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
v.
Felton Hayman
DISPOSITION SENTENCING/PENALTIES
Disposition
Case Event
Sequence/Description
Sentencing Judge
Sentence/Diversion Program Type

Disposition Date
Offense Disposition
Sentence Date

Page 3 of 9

Final Disposition
Grade
Section

Incarceration/Diversionary Period

Credit For Time Served


Start Date

Sentence Conditions
Migrated Disposition

Migrated Dispositional Event


1 / MURDER
O'Keefe, Joseph D.
Confinement

02/19/1993
Guilty Plea

Final Disposition
18 2502

02/19/1993
Min of 10.00 Years
Max of 20.00 Years

Financial Assessments
O'Keefe, Joseph D.
Confinement

07/09/2009
10 to 20 years

07/06/2009

Financial Assessments
2 / VOLUNTARY MANSLAUGHTER

Not Guilty

O'Keefe, Joseph D.

02/19/1993

O'Keefe, Joseph D.

07/09/2009

3 / INVOLUNTARY MANSLAUGHTER
O'Keefe, Joseph D.
O'Keefe, Joseph D.
4 / CARRYING FIREARMS WITHOUT LICENSE
O'Keefe, Joseph D.
O'Keefe, Joseph D.
5 / FIREARMS WITHOUT LICENSE-IN AUTO

Nolle Prossed
07/09/2009
Nolle Prossed
07/09/2009
Nolle Prossed
02/19/1993
07/09/2009

7 / CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY
O'Keefe, Joseph D.
Confinement
O'Keefe, Joseph D.

CPCMS 9082

18 6106

02/19/1993

O'Keefe, Joseph D.

O'Keefe, Joseph D.

18 2504

02/19/1993

O'Keefe, Joseph D.
6 / CARRYING FIRE ARMS/PUBLIC STREET OR
PLACE
O'Keefe, Joseph D.

18 2503

Nolle Prossed

18 6106

18 6108

02/19/1993
07/09/2009
Guilty Plea

18 903

02/19/1993
Min of 5.00 Years
Max of 10.00 Years
07/09/2009

Printed: 11/17/2014

Recent entries made in the court filing offices may not be immediately reflected on these docket sheets. Neither the courts of the Unified Judicial
System of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania nor the Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts assume any liability for inaccurate or delayed
data, errors or omissions on these reports. Docket Sheet information should not be used in place of a criminal history background check which can
only be provided by the Pennsylvania State Police. Moreover an employer who does not comply with the provisions of the Criminal History Record
Information Act may be subject to civil liability as set forth in 18 Pa.C.S. Section 9183.

Case ID: 141101744

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY


DOCKET
Docket Number: CP-51-CR-0509927-1991

CRIMINAL DOCKET
Court Case
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
v.
Felton Hayman
DISPOSITION SENTENCING/PENALTIES
Disposition
Case Event
Sequence/Description
Sentencing Judge
Sentence/Diversion Program Type

Disposition Date
Offense Disposition
Sentence Date

Page 4 of 9

Final Disposition
Grade
Section

Incarceration/Diversionary Period

Credit For Time Served


Start Date

Sentence Conditions
Confinement

8 / POSSESSING INSTRUMENTS OF CRIME


O'Keefe, Joseph D.
O'Keefe, Joseph D.
9 / POSSESSING INSTRUMENTS OF CRIME WEAPON

Min of 2.00 Years 6.00 Months


Max of 5.00 Years
Other
Nolle Prossed
07/09/2009
Nolle Prossed
02/19/1993

O'Keefe, Joseph D.

07/09/2009
Nolle Prossed

O'Keefe, Joseph D.

02/19/1993

O'Keefe, Joseph D.

07/09/2009

11 / FIREARMS WITHOUT LICENSE-IN AUTO

Nolle Prossed

O'Keefe, Joseph D.

02/19/1993

O'Keefe, Joseph D.

07/09/2009

12 / CARRYING FIRE ARMS/PUBLIC STREET OR


PLACE
O'Keefe, Joseph D.
O'Keefe, Joseph D.
13 / CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY
O'Keefe, Joseph D.
O'Keefe, Joseph D.
14 / POSSESSING INSTRUMENTS OF CRIME

Nolle Prossed

Nolle Prossed

CPCMS 9082

18 6108

18 903

07/09/2009
Nolle Prossed
07/09/2009

O'Keefe, Joseph D.

18 6106

02/19/1993

O'Keefe, Joseph D.

16 / AGGRAVATED ASSAULT

18 6106

07/09/2009

02/19/1993

O'Keefe, Joseph D.

18 907

02/19/1993

O'Keefe, Joseph D.
15 / POSSESSING INSTRUMENTS OF CRIME
WEAPON
O'Keefe, Joseph D.

18 907

02/19/1993

O'Keefe, Joseph D.
10 / CARRYING FIREARMS WITHOUT LICENSE

07/09/2009

Nolle Prossed

18 907

18 907

02/19/1993
07/09/2009
Guilty Plea

18 2702

02/19/1993

Printed: 11/17/2014

Recent entries made in the court filing offices may not be immediately reflected on these docket sheets. Neither the courts of the Unified Judicial
System of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania nor the Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts assume any liability for inaccurate or delayed
data, errors or omissions on these reports. Docket Sheet information should not be used in place of a criminal history background check which can
only be provided by the Pennsylvania State Police. Moreover an employer who does not comply with the provisions of the Criminal History Record
Information Act may be subject to civil liability as set forth in 18 Pa.C.S. Section 9183.

Case ID: 141101744

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY


DOCKET
Docket Number: CP-51-CR-0509927-1991

CRIMINAL DOCKET
Court Case
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
v.
Felton Hayman
DISPOSITION SENTENCING/PENALTIES
Disposition
Case Event
Sequence/Description
Sentencing Judge
Sentence/Diversion Program Type

Disposition Date
Offense Disposition
Sentence Date

Page 5 of 9

Final Disposition
Grade
Section

Incarceration/Diversionary Period

Credit For Time Served


Start Date

Sentence Conditions
Confinement
O'Keefe, Joseph D.
Confinement

17 / SIMPLE ASSAULT
O'Keefe, Joseph D.
O'Keefe, Joseph D.
18 / AGGRAVATED ASSAULT
O'Keefe, Joseph D.
Confinement
O'Keefe, Joseph D.
Confinement

19 / SIMPLE ASSAULT

Min of 5.00 Years


Max of 10.00 Years
07/09/2009
Min of 2.00 Years 6.00 Months
Max of 5.00 Years
2 1/2 - 5 years
Nolle Prossed
07/09/2009
Guilty Plea

07/09/2009
Min of 2.00 Years 6.00 Months
Max of 5.00 Years
Other
Guilty Plea
02/19/1993
07/09/2009
Nolle Prossed

O'Keefe, Joseph D.

02/19/1993

O'Keefe, Joseph D.

07/09/2009

O'Keefe, Joseph D.
22 / CARRYING FIREARMS WITHOUT LICENSE
O'Keefe, Joseph D.
O'Keefe, Joseph D.
23 / FIREARMS WITHOUT LICENSE-IN AUTO

Nolle Prossed

07/06/2009

18 2701

18 907

18 907

02/19/1993
07/09/2009
Nolle Prossed

18 6106

02/19/1993
07/09/2009
Nolle Prossed

O'Keefe, Joseph D.

02/19/1993

O'Keefe, Joseph D.

07/09/2009

CPCMS 9082

18 2702

02/19/1993
Min of 5.00 Years
Max of 10.00 Years

O'Keefe, Joseph D.

21 / POSSESSING INSTRUMENTS OF CRIME


WEAPON
O'Keefe, Joseph D.

18 2701

02/19/1993

O'Keefe, Joseph D.
20 / POSSESSING INSTRUMENTS OF CRIME

07/09/2009

18 6106

Printed: 11/17/2014

Recent entries made in the court filing offices may not be immediately reflected on these docket sheets. Neither the courts of the Unified Judicial
System of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania nor the Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts assume any liability for inaccurate or delayed
data, errors or omissions on these reports. Docket Sheet information should not be used in place of a criminal history background check which can
only be provided by the Pennsylvania State Police. Moreover an employer who does not comply with the provisions of the Criminal History Record
Information Act may be subject to civil liability as set forth in 18 Pa.C.S. Section 9183.

Case ID: 141101744

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY


DOCKET
Docket Number: CP-51-CR-0509927-1991

CRIMINAL DOCKET
Court Case
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
v.
Felton Hayman
DISPOSITION SENTENCING/PENALTIES
Disposition
Case Event
Sequence/Description
Sentencing Judge
Sentence/Diversion Program Type

Disposition Date
Offense Disposition
Sentence Date

Page 6 of 9

Final Disposition
Grade
Section

Incarceration/Diversionary Period

Credit For Time Served


Start Date

Sentence Conditions
24 / CARRYING FIRE ARMS/PUBLIC STREET OR
PLACE
O'Keefe, Joseph D.
O'Keefe, Joseph D.
25 / CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY

Nolle Prossed
02/19/1993
07/09/2009
Nolle Prossed

O'Keefe, Joseph D.

02/19/1993

O'Keefe, Joseph D.

07/09/2009

26 / CORRUPT ORGANIZATIONS
O'Keefe, Joseph D.
Confinement
O'Keefe, Joseph D.

18 6108

Proceed to Court (Conviction


Reversed)

18 903

18 911

02/19/1993
Min of 2.00 Years 6.00 Months
Max of 5.00 Years
07/09/2009

LINKED SENTENCES:
Link 1
CP-51-CR-0509927-1991 - Seq. No. 16 (18 2702 ) - Confinement is Consecutive to

CP-51-CR-0509927-1991 - Seq. No. 1 (18 2502 ) - Confinement


Link 2
CP-51-CR-0509927-1991 - Seq. No. 18 (18 2702 ) - Confinement is Concurrent with

CP-51-CR-0509927-1991 - Seq. No. 16 (18 2702 ) - Confinement


Link 3
CP-51-CR-0509927-1991 - Seq. No. 7 (18 903 ) - Confinement is Concurrent with

CP-51-CR-0509927-1991 - Seq. No. 18 (18 2702 ) - Confinement

CPCMS 9082

Printed: 11/17/2014

Recent entries made in the court filing offices may not be immediately reflected on these docket sheets. Neither the courts of the Unified Judicial
System of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania nor the Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts assume any liability for inaccurate or delayed
data, errors or omissions on these reports. Docket Sheet information should not be used in place of a criminal history background check which can
only be provided by the Pennsylvania State Police. Moreover an employer who does not comply with the provisions of the Criminal History Record
Information Act may be subject to civil liability as set forth in 18 Pa.C.S. Section 9183.

Case ID: 141101744

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY


DOCKET
Docket Number: CP-51-CR-0509927-1991

CRIMINAL DOCKET
Court Case

COMMONWEALTH INFORMATION
Name:

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
v.
Felton Hayman
ATTORNEY INFORMATION
Mitchell S. Strutin
Court Appointed
025645
Supreme Court No:
Name:

Philadelphia County District Attorney's


Office
Prosecutor

Supreme Court No:


Phone Number(s):
215-686-8000
Address:

Page 7 of 9

(Phone)

3 South Penn Square


Philadelphia, PA 19107

Rep. Status:

Inactive

Phone Number(s):
215-567-2726
215-567-2726
215-567-7985
Address:

(Phone)
(Phone)
(Fax)

One Penn Ctr Ste 936


1617 JFK Boulevard
Philadelphia, PA 19103
Representing: Hayman, Felton

ENTRIES
Sequence Number

CP Filed Date

Document Date

Filed By

05/14/1991

Unknown Filer

02/19/1993

Migrated, Filer

Held for Court


1

Migrated Automatic Registry Entry (Disposition) Text


2

02/19/1993

Migrated, Filer

02/19/1993

Migrated, Filer

06/05/2009

Court of Common Pleas Philadelphia County

07/09/2009

O'Keefe, Joseph D.

Disposition Filed
3
Migrated Sentence
4
Hearing Notice
1

Order - Sentence/Penalty Imposed


re-sentence per court decision. Conviction on count 26 Corrupt Organizations ordered vacated per Federal
Order
1

07/18/2009

Hayman, Felton

Return Case From Collection Agency - Monies Successfully Collected

CPCMS 9082

Printed: 11/17/2014

Recent entries made in the court filing offices may not be immediately reflected on these docket sheets. Neither the courts of the Unified Judicial
System of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania nor the Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts assume any liability for inaccurate or delayed
data, errors or omissions on these reports. Docket Sheet information should not be used in place of a criminal history background check which can
only be provided by the Pennsylvania State Police. Moreover an employer who does not comply with the provisions of the Criminal History Record
Information Act may be subject to civil liability as set forth in 18 Pa.C.S. Section 9183.

Case ID: 141101744

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY


DOCKET
Docket Number: CP-51-CR-0509927-1991

CRIMINAL DOCKET
Court Case
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
v.
Felton Hayman
ENTRIES
Sequence Number

CP Filed Date

10/27/2010

Document Date

Page 8 of 9

Filed By
O'Keefe, Joseph D.

Amended Sentencing Order


AND NOW, this 27th day of October, 2010 after careful review of the court record, and after Finding that the
Defendant was convicted under the Pennsylvania Corrupt Organizations Act (PCOA) for Criminal acts that the
Pennsylvania Supreme Court subsequently ruled were not included within the scope of the statute in effect at the
time of the conviction, it is hereby ORDERED AND DECREED as follows;
1. On Third Degree Murder, sentence remains 10 to 20 years incarceration.
2. On Aggravated Assault and Battery, 2 1/2 to 5 years to run consecutive to Third Degree Murder Bill.
3. On Aggravated Assault, 2 1/2 to 5 years concurrent.
4. On Conspiracy, 2 1/2 to 5 years concurrent.
BY THE COURT:
JOSEPH D. O'KEEFE, J.
1

11/18/2010

Mozenter, Robert B.

Motion for Reconsideration Nunc Pro Tunc


1

12/03/2010

O'Keefe, Joseph D.

Order Denying Motion for Reconsideration Nunc Pro Tunc


1

03/05/2014

Mozenter, Robert B.

Motion for Parole


Motion for Early Termination of Proobation/Parole Pursuant to 42 Pa.C.S.A.9771

CPCMS 9082

Printed: 11/17/2014

Recent entries made in the court filing offices may not be immediately reflected on these docket sheets. Neither the courts of the Unified Judicial
System of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania nor the Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts assume any liability for inaccurate or delayed
data, errors or omissions on these reports. Docket Sheet information should not be used in place of a criminal history background check which can
only be provided by the Pennsylvania State Police. Moreover an employer who does not comply with the provisions of the Criminal History Record
Information Act may be subject to civil liability as set forth in 18 Pa.C.S. Section 9183.

Case ID: 141101744

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY


DOCKET
Docket Number: CP-51-CR-0509927-1991

CRIMINAL DOCKET
Court Case
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
v.
Felton Hayman
CASE FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Last Payment Date: 05/08/2009
Hayman, Felton

Page 9 of 9

Total of Last Payment: -$17.52


Assessment

Payments

Adjustments

Non Monetary
Payments

Total

$10.00

-$10.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

Judicial Computer Project

$5.00

-$5.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

Collection Fee (Philadelphia)

$2.52

-$2.52

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

Costs/Fees Totals:

$17.52

-$17.52

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

Grand Totals:

$17.52

-$17.52

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

Defendant
Costs/Fees

Domestic Violence Compensation (Act


44 of 1988)

** - Indicates assessment is subrogated

CPCMS 9082

Printed: 11/17/2014

Recent entries made in the court filing offices may not be immediately reflected on these docket sheets. Neither the courts of the Unified Judicial
System of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania nor the Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts assume any liability for inaccurate or delayed
data, errors or omissions on these reports. Docket Sheet information should not be used in place of a criminal history background check which can
only be provided by the Pennsylvania State Police. Moreover an employer who does not comply with the provisions of the Criminal History Record
Information Act may be subject to civil liability as set forth in 18 Pa.C.S. Section 9183.

Case ID: 141101744

You might also like