Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Plainti,
v.
November Term
Defendants.
NOTICE TO DEFEND
AVISO
Plainti,
v.
November Term
Defendants.
Complaint
Bag of Holdings, LLC brings this Complaint against the City of
Philadelphia and Kenyatta Johnson, through its attorney A. Jordan
Rushie, and alleges the following:
S U M M A RY O F T H E C A S E
This matter involves a pay to play scheme for vacant lots in the
Second District of Philadelphia. Councilman Kenyatta Johnson is
trying to sell city owned properties to political insiders and demanding purchasers use his preferred developers, in what is a flagrant violation of the Citys documented policies.
PA RT I E S
11. The purpose of the City Sale Policy is to [c]onvey land in a unified, predictable, timely and transparent process. (Exhibit A).
12. Under the City Sale Policy, [o]pen Market Sales such as broker
listings, the use of the Multiple Listing Service, web sites or other recognized method of advertising may be used to encourage
broad participation in the sale of selected properties. (Exhibit
A).
13. Bag of Holdings LLC is a Qualified Purchaser under the City
Sale Policy.
14. Plainti has made multiple Expressions of Interest on properties located in the Second District and Point Breeze, in accordance with the City Sale Policy.
15. However, many properties the Plainti has made Expressions of
Interest on are scheduled for sale to political insiders of
Councilman Kenyatta Johnson.
16. On information and belief, certain political insiders made campaign contributions to Councilman Johnson or performed other favors.
17. Among other things, those deemed political insiders by Councilman Kenyatta Johnson are able to circumvent the competitive
bidding process mandated by the City Sale Policy.
18. Certain properties are scheduled for sale to the political insiders
without following the City Sale Policy, or notice to Bag of Holdings LLC.
19. For instance, in just the last three months, at least seventeen out
of twenty-two properties scheduled for sale by the City are to
political insiders.
20.Some of these political insiders include, but are not limited to,
Hayman Construction LLC, Tremelle Hayman, and Felton
Hayman.
# of 6
3
# of 6
4
Count 1
Violations of Substantive Due Process and Equal Protection
Against All Defendants
31. On information and belief, the Defendants, acting under color
of state law, intentionally scheduled for sale properties in the
Second District to political insiders.
32. In the alternative, the Defendants, acting under color of state
law, arbitrarily treated Bag of Holdings dierently from other
similarly situated real estate developers.
33. Plainti was never given any type of hearing or notice before
Defendants unfairly scheduled for sale properties in the Second
District to political insiders.
34. Defendants did not provide substantive or procedural due
process of law to Bag of Holdings.
35. The Defendants actions essentially cut Bag of Holdings out of
the competitive bidding process.
36. Defendants caused Plainti to suer by their wrongful conduct
in violation of the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendment to the
United States Constitution and Pennsylvania Constitution, actionable through 32 U.S.C. 1983, et. seq., and state law.
37. As a result, Bag of Holdings has sustained monetary damages
and is unable to develop certain properties in Point Breeze.
Count II
Civil Conspiracy
Against All Defendants
38. Upon information and belief, the Defendants agreed among
themselves to ensure that certain properties in Point Breeze
were scheduled for sale to political insiders.
5# of 6
#
A. Jordan Rushie
M U LV I H I L L & R U S H I E L LC
2424 East York Street Suite 316
Philadelphia, PA 19125
215.385.5291
# of 6
6
Verification
I, Michael Pollack, am the sole member of Bag of Holdings LLC. I
hereby state that the facts above set forth are true and correct (or are
true and correct to the best of my knowledge, information and belief) and that I expect to be able to prove the same at a hearing held
in this matter. I understand that the statements herein are made
subject to the penalties of 18 Pa.C.S. 4904 (relating to unsworn
falsification to authorities).
/S/
Michael Pollack
Exhibit A
City of Philadelphia
4.2012
Guiding Principles
This policy shall be used to promote and regulate the sale and reuse of City properties.
The sale and reuse of City properties shall at all times be consistent with the following guiding
principles.
o Encourage the development and reuse of vacant properties consistent with the City of
Philadelphias Comprehensive Plan (Philadelphia2035), and other City-approved and
accepted plans.
o Eliminate blight and revitalize neighborhoods.
o Strengthen the Citys tax base.
o Sell, at market value, properties without an adopted public purpose, and discount
properties that provide significant community benefits.
o Convey land in a unified, predictable, timely and transparent process.
Applicability
These policies apply to the real property inventories owned by the Philadelphia Redevelopment
Authority, the Philadelphia Housing Development Corporation, and the surplus inventory held
by the City of Philadelphias Department of Public Property. These agencies are collectively
referred to as The City throughout this document, and are each responsible for decisionmaking during the disposition process and adherence to these policies.
All expressions of interest for property will be made through the Philadelphia Redevelopment
Authority (PRA).
During the review of requests for property under these policies, the City may, at its discretion,
elect not to convey the requested property. Under such circumstances, the City will provide a
reason for this decision.
4.2012
4.2012
The proposed use must be consistent with the City of Philadelphias Comprehensive Plan
(Philadelphia2035) and other City-approved and accepted plans.
The applicant may not use or move into the property
An option fee will be due upon execution
Not-for-profits and city-subsidized projects may be exempt from a fee
The contract terms will be public information in accordance with applicable law.
Applicant must have a letter of support from the District Council Member.
Requests for Proposals/Qualifications
If the City has a specific planned use for a parcel, a Request for Proposals (RFP) or Request for
Qualifications (RFQ) will be issued to identify and select a potential developer. The RFP format
allows the City to explain the planned use and any further restrictions that might be placed on
the developer or successive owners of the property.
RFP will be widely advertised to encourage broad participation.
Selection criteria will include factors such as developer capacity and proposed
development outcomes as well as the price.
The price established through this process will be considered the market value of the
property, and it must be acceptable to the City.
The RFP may be developed in consultation with City Council, the City Planning
Commission, and other stakeholders as appropriate.
4.2012
Discounted Sales
The City may convey a property for a discounted price to support public purposes such as
affordable housing, economic development, community development, or side yards. If a
property is identified for one of the following uses, the City will evaluate the proposal and
property request to determine if the proposed project provides significant, visible community
benefits that would merit the proposed reduction in sales proceeds.
4.2012
Discounted Sales
The following programs qualify for discounted pricing:
Affordable Housing
Developments that provide affordable housing as defined under federal guidelines may acquire
property for a discount. Affordable housing projects do not have to be directly subsidized by
the City to qualify for discounted pricing. Preference may be given to affordable and mixedincome housing developments that are consistent with major goals of the City of Philadelphias
Comprehensive Plan (Philadelphia2035) and other City-approved and accepted plans including
providing housing in locations that connect residents directly to a) employment opportunities,
b) public transit, and c) basic services.
4.2012
safety and mobility for children, seniors, and other pedestrians, including sidewalk
improvements, pedestrian plazas, traffic medians, or easements for trails
The length of the mortgage will be 10 years from the date of purchase
The amount of the obligation will decrease by 10% every year for 10 years
Upon completion of the ten year time frame the City will satisfy the mortgage
If the purchaser wants to sell the property before the 10 year expiration date of the
mortgage, the City must receive the amount owed on the mortgage before the
mortgage will be satisfied.
The market value may be established through any suitable method at the Citys
discretion.
This mortgage may be assumed by heirs and successors to the original purchaser.
Community Gardens
Community gardens that have a sustained track record of excellent maintenance, broad
community involvement and support and financial capacity may be conveyed to an institution
that promises to maintain and care for the property for this purpose subject to a right of
reversion by the City. A deed restriction will ensure compliance with this goal.
Side Yards
Property may be transferred to individuals for nominal consideration in accordance with the
following:
o Must be vacant land adjacent to the applicants residential property, with a common
boundary line on either side or behind the property.
o Must be located on a block that is predominantly occupied.
o In the event that multiple adjacent property owners desire to acquire the same
side lot, the lot may be transferred to the highest bidder for the property, or
subdivided upon mutual agreement by both adjoining property owners.
o Maximum combined Lot Value: $15,000
o Maximum combined Lot Size: 3000 sq ft
o Associated costs will be paid by the applicant, including all relevant taxes, fees, and
title insurance.
4.2012
Discontinued Programs
At the Citys discretion, property may be conveyed under the terms of discontinued programs
for those applicants who applied for and were awarded property under previous program
guidelines, and can demonstrate continuous effort and completion of their obligations under
the original program terms. Applicants will be subject to the Qualified Purchaser & Bid
provisions, in addition to the Ethics provisions of these policies.
4.2012
Urban Agriculture
The City supports the use of vacant land for urban agriculture that improves the quality of life in
the Citys neighborhoods.
Other Uses
The City reserves the right to license the use of property for a temporary use such as a
community event, pop-up activity, farmers market or other such use. The terms of such a
license will be determined on a case by case basis, and may require insurance coverage and
other costs.
4.2012
Ethics
Home Rule Charter and Philadelphia Code requirements
The City of Philadelphia is committed to ethical and transparent processes for the
administration of vacant land. All real estate transactions are governed by City and State laws
and rules that generally prohibit, among other things, conflicts of interest, the disclosure of
confidential information, and the representation of another by a City official or employee in a
transaction with the City.
Financial Assistance
Any grant, loan, tax incentive, bond financing subsidy for land purchase or otherwise, or other
form of assistance that is realized by or provided to a person in the amount of $50,000 or more
through the authority or approval of the City, is by law considered Financial Assistance under
Chapter 17-1400 of the Philadelphia Code. Financial Assistance recipients must meet eligibility
requirements by disclosing their political contributions. Financial Assistance includes the
transfer of City property for less than market value. Recipients of Financial Assistance must
comply with campaign contribution limits and must disclose campaign contributions for five
years after receiving Financial Assistance. They must also disclose solicitations for any reason
from any City official.
For more information on these requirements, please see www.phila.gov/integrityworks. Any
person inside or outside of City government with a concern that the disposition or
administration of City property is unethical or violates the Citys Financial Assistance
requirements should contact the Citys Chief Integrity Officer at 215.686.2178 or Inspector
General at 215.686.1770.
The City shall maintain and make available for public review and inspection:
An inventory of real property owned by the City of Philadelphia
A record of all real property conveyed to other parties, including the price for which the
property was conveyed, the party to which the property was conveyed, and the use to
which the property was/will be put.
Reports shall be prepared and posted for public review on an annual basis.
4.2012
10
Exhibit B
CRIMINAL DOCKET
Court Case
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
v.
Felton Hayman
CASE INFORMATION
Page 1 of 9
OTN: M 480044-5
LOTN:
Complaint/Incident #:
Case Local Number Type(s)
C9105099278
8935074966
01000732
8935074966
RELATED CASES
Related Docket No
Related Court
Association Reason
CP-01-51-Crim
CP-51-CR-0509923-1991
CP-01-51-Crim
CP-51-CR-0509922-1991
Comm. v. Maximillian, El
CP-01-51-Crim
STATUS INFORMATION
Case Status:
Closed
Status Date
12/03/2010
Processing Status
07/09/2009
Sentenced/Penalty Imposed
06/05/2009
Awaiting Sentencing
06/05/2009
Awaiting PSI
02/19/1993
Completed
05/14/1991
Arrest Date:
04/10/1991
Complaint Date:
05/14/1991
Completed
CALENDAR EVENTS
Case Calendar
Event Type
Schedule
Start Date
Start
Time
Sentencing
07/06/2009
9:30 am
Room
Judge Name
Schedule
Status
304
Scheduled
DEFENDANT INFORMATION
Date Of Birth:
05/18/1968
CASE PARTICIPANTS
Participant Type
Name
Defendant
Hayman, Felton
CHARGES
CPCMS 9082
Printed: 11/17/2014
Recent entries made in the court filing offices may not be immediately reflected on these docket sheets. Neither the courts of the Unified Judicial
System of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania nor the Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts assume any liability for inaccurate or delayed
data, errors or omissions on these reports. Docket Sheet information should not be used in place of a criminal history background check which can
only be provided by the Pennsylvania State Police. Moreover an employer who does not comply with the provisions of the Criminal History Record
Information Act may be subject to civil liability as set forth in 18 Pa.C.S. Section 9183.
CRIMINAL DOCKET
Court Case
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
v.
Felton Hayman
CHARGES
Seq.
Orig Seq.
Grade
Page 2 of 9
Statute
Statute Description
Offense Dt.
OTN
18 2502
MURDER
08/10/1989
M 480044-5
18 2503
VOLUNTARY MANSLAUGHTER
08/10/1989
M 480044-5
18 2504
INVOLUNTARY MANSLAUGHTER
08/10/1989
M 480044-5
18 6106
08/10/1989
M 480044-5
18 6106
08/10/1989
M 480044-5
18 6108
08/10/1989
M 480044-5
18 903
08/10/1989
M 480044-5
18 907
08/10/1989
M 480044-5
18 907
M 480044-5
10
10
18 6106
08/10/1989
08/10/1989
M 480044-5
11
11
18 6106
08/10/1989
M 480044-5
12
12
18 6108
08/10/1989
M 480044-5
13
13
18 903
08/10/1989
M 480044-5
14
14
18 907
08/10/1989
M 480044-5
15
15
18 907
08/10/1989
M 480044-5
16
16
18 2702
08/10/1989
M 480044-5
17
17
18 2701
SIMPLE ASSAULT
08/10/1989
M 480044-5
18
18
18 2702
AGGRAVATED ASSAULT
08/10/1989
M 480044-5
19
19
18 2701
SIMPLE ASSAULT
08/10/1989
M 480044-5
20
20
18 907
08/10/1989
M 480044-5
21
21
18 907
M 480044-5
22
22
18 6106
08/10/1989
08/10/1989
M 480044-5
23
23
18 6106
08/10/1989
M 480044-5
24
24
18 6108
08/10/1989
M 480044-5
25
25
18 903
08/10/1989
M 480044-5
26
26
18 911
CORRUPT ORGANIZATIONS
08/10/1989
M 480044-5
DISPOSITION SENTENCING/PENALTIES
Disposition
Case Event
Sequence/Description
Sentencing Judge
Sentence/Diversion Program Type
Disposition Date
Offense Disposition
Sentence Date
Final Disposition
Grade
Section
Incarceration/Diversionary Period
Sentence Conditions
CPCMS 9082
Printed: 11/17/2014
Recent entries made in the court filing offices may not be immediately reflected on these docket sheets. Neither the courts of the Unified Judicial
System of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania nor the Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts assume any liability for inaccurate or delayed
data, errors or omissions on these reports. Docket Sheet information should not be used in place of a criminal history background check which can
only be provided by the Pennsylvania State Police. Moreover an employer who does not comply with the provisions of the Criminal History Record
Information Act may be subject to civil liability as set forth in 18 Pa.C.S. Section 9183.
CRIMINAL DOCKET
Court Case
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
v.
Felton Hayman
DISPOSITION SENTENCING/PENALTIES
Disposition
Case Event
Sequence/Description
Sentencing Judge
Sentence/Diversion Program Type
Disposition Date
Offense Disposition
Sentence Date
Page 3 of 9
Final Disposition
Grade
Section
Incarceration/Diversionary Period
Sentence Conditions
Migrated Disposition
02/19/1993
Guilty Plea
Final Disposition
18 2502
02/19/1993
Min of 10.00 Years
Max of 20.00 Years
Financial Assessments
O'Keefe, Joseph D.
Confinement
07/09/2009
10 to 20 years
07/06/2009
Financial Assessments
2 / VOLUNTARY MANSLAUGHTER
Not Guilty
O'Keefe, Joseph D.
02/19/1993
O'Keefe, Joseph D.
07/09/2009
3 / INVOLUNTARY MANSLAUGHTER
O'Keefe, Joseph D.
O'Keefe, Joseph D.
4 / CARRYING FIREARMS WITHOUT LICENSE
O'Keefe, Joseph D.
O'Keefe, Joseph D.
5 / FIREARMS WITHOUT LICENSE-IN AUTO
Nolle Prossed
07/09/2009
Nolle Prossed
07/09/2009
Nolle Prossed
02/19/1993
07/09/2009
7 / CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY
O'Keefe, Joseph D.
Confinement
O'Keefe, Joseph D.
CPCMS 9082
18 6106
02/19/1993
O'Keefe, Joseph D.
O'Keefe, Joseph D.
18 2504
02/19/1993
O'Keefe, Joseph D.
6 / CARRYING FIRE ARMS/PUBLIC STREET OR
PLACE
O'Keefe, Joseph D.
18 2503
Nolle Prossed
18 6106
18 6108
02/19/1993
07/09/2009
Guilty Plea
18 903
02/19/1993
Min of 5.00 Years
Max of 10.00 Years
07/09/2009
Printed: 11/17/2014
Recent entries made in the court filing offices may not be immediately reflected on these docket sheets. Neither the courts of the Unified Judicial
System of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania nor the Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts assume any liability for inaccurate or delayed
data, errors or omissions on these reports. Docket Sheet information should not be used in place of a criminal history background check which can
only be provided by the Pennsylvania State Police. Moreover an employer who does not comply with the provisions of the Criminal History Record
Information Act may be subject to civil liability as set forth in 18 Pa.C.S. Section 9183.
CRIMINAL DOCKET
Court Case
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
v.
Felton Hayman
DISPOSITION SENTENCING/PENALTIES
Disposition
Case Event
Sequence/Description
Sentencing Judge
Sentence/Diversion Program Type
Disposition Date
Offense Disposition
Sentence Date
Page 4 of 9
Final Disposition
Grade
Section
Incarceration/Diversionary Period
Sentence Conditions
Confinement
O'Keefe, Joseph D.
07/09/2009
Nolle Prossed
O'Keefe, Joseph D.
02/19/1993
O'Keefe, Joseph D.
07/09/2009
Nolle Prossed
O'Keefe, Joseph D.
02/19/1993
O'Keefe, Joseph D.
07/09/2009
Nolle Prossed
Nolle Prossed
CPCMS 9082
18 6108
18 903
07/09/2009
Nolle Prossed
07/09/2009
O'Keefe, Joseph D.
18 6106
02/19/1993
O'Keefe, Joseph D.
16 / AGGRAVATED ASSAULT
18 6106
07/09/2009
02/19/1993
O'Keefe, Joseph D.
18 907
02/19/1993
O'Keefe, Joseph D.
15 / POSSESSING INSTRUMENTS OF CRIME
WEAPON
O'Keefe, Joseph D.
18 907
02/19/1993
O'Keefe, Joseph D.
10 / CARRYING FIREARMS WITHOUT LICENSE
07/09/2009
Nolle Prossed
18 907
18 907
02/19/1993
07/09/2009
Guilty Plea
18 2702
02/19/1993
Printed: 11/17/2014
Recent entries made in the court filing offices may not be immediately reflected on these docket sheets. Neither the courts of the Unified Judicial
System of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania nor the Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts assume any liability for inaccurate or delayed
data, errors or omissions on these reports. Docket Sheet information should not be used in place of a criminal history background check which can
only be provided by the Pennsylvania State Police. Moreover an employer who does not comply with the provisions of the Criminal History Record
Information Act may be subject to civil liability as set forth in 18 Pa.C.S. Section 9183.
CRIMINAL DOCKET
Court Case
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
v.
Felton Hayman
DISPOSITION SENTENCING/PENALTIES
Disposition
Case Event
Sequence/Description
Sentencing Judge
Sentence/Diversion Program Type
Disposition Date
Offense Disposition
Sentence Date
Page 5 of 9
Final Disposition
Grade
Section
Incarceration/Diversionary Period
Sentence Conditions
Confinement
O'Keefe, Joseph D.
Confinement
17 / SIMPLE ASSAULT
O'Keefe, Joseph D.
O'Keefe, Joseph D.
18 / AGGRAVATED ASSAULT
O'Keefe, Joseph D.
Confinement
O'Keefe, Joseph D.
Confinement
19 / SIMPLE ASSAULT
07/09/2009
Min of 2.00 Years 6.00 Months
Max of 5.00 Years
Other
Guilty Plea
02/19/1993
07/09/2009
Nolle Prossed
O'Keefe, Joseph D.
02/19/1993
O'Keefe, Joseph D.
07/09/2009
O'Keefe, Joseph D.
22 / CARRYING FIREARMS WITHOUT LICENSE
O'Keefe, Joseph D.
O'Keefe, Joseph D.
23 / FIREARMS WITHOUT LICENSE-IN AUTO
Nolle Prossed
07/06/2009
18 2701
18 907
18 907
02/19/1993
07/09/2009
Nolle Prossed
18 6106
02/19/1993
07/09/2009
Nolle Prossed
O'Keefe, Joseph D.
02/19/1993
O'Keefe, Joseph D.
07/09/2009
CPCMS 9082
18 2702
02/19/1993
Min of 5.00 Years
Max of 10.00 Years
O'Keefe, Joseph D.
18 2701
02/19/1993
O'Keefe, Joseph D.
20 / POSSESSING INSTRUMENTS OF CRIME
07/09/2009
18 6106
Printed: 11/17/2014
Recent entries made in the court filing offices may not be immediately reflected on these docket sheets. Neither the courts of the Unified Judicial
System of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania nor the Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts assume any liability for inaccurate or delayed
data, errors or omissions on these reports. Docket Sheet information should not be used in place of a criminal history background check which can
only be provided by the Pennsylvania State Police. Moreover an employer who does not comply with the provisions of the Criminal History Record
Information Act may be subject to civil liability as set forth in 18 Pa.C.S. Section 9183.
CRIMINAL DOCKET
Court Case
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
v.
Felton Hayman
DISPOSITION SENTENCING/PENALTIES
Disposition
Case Event
Sequence/Description
Sentencing Judge
Sentence/Diversion Program Type
Disposition Date
Offense Disposition
Sentence Date
Page 6 of 9
Final Disposition
Grade
Section
Incarceration/Diversionary Period
Sentence Conditions
24 / CARRYING FIRE ARMS/PUBLIC STREET OR
PLACE
O'Keefe, Joseph D.
O'Keefe, Joseph D.
25 / CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY
Nolle Prossed
02/19/1993
07/09/2009
Nolle Prossed
O'Keefe, Joseph D.
02/19/1993
O'Keefe, Joseph D.
07/09/2009
26 / CORRUPT ORGANIZATIONS
O'Keefe, Joseph D.
Confinement
O'Keefe, Joseph D.
18 6108
18 903
18 911
02/19/1993
Min of 2.00 Years 6.00 Months
Max of 5.00 Years
07/09/2009
LINKED SENTENCES:
Link 1
CP-51-CR-0509927-1991 - Seq. No. 16 (18 2702 ) - Confinement is Consecutive to
CPCMS 9082
Printed: 11/17/2014
Recent entries made in the court filing offices may not be immediately reflected on these docket sheets. Neither the courts of the Unified Judicial
System of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania nor the Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts assume any liability for inaccurate or delayed
data, errors or omissions on these reports. Docket Sheet information should not be used in place of a criminal history background check which can
only be provided by the Pennsylvania State Police. Moreover an employer who does not comply with the provisions of the Criminal History Record
Information Act may be subject to civil liability as set forth in 18 Pa.C.S. Section 9183.
CRIMINAL DOCKET
Court Case
COMMONWEALTH INFORMATION
Name:
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
v.
Felton Hayman
ATTORNEY INFORMATION
Mitchell S. Strutin
Court Appointed
025645
Supreme Court No:
Name:
Page 7 of 9
(Phone)
Rep. Status:
Inactive
Phone Number(s):
215-567-2726
215-567-2726
215-567-7985
Address:
(Phone)
(Phone)
(Fax)
ENTRIES
Sequence Number
CP Filed Date
Document Date
Filed By
05/14/1991
Unknown Filer
02/19/1993
Migrated, Filer
02/19/1993
Migrated, Filer
02/19/1993
Migrated, Filer
06/05/2009
07/09/2009
O'Keefe, Joseph D.
Disposition Filed
3
Migrated Sentence
4
Hearing Notice
1
07/18/2009
Hayman, Felton
CPCMS 9082
Printed: 11/17/2014
Recent entries made in the court filing offices may not be immediately reflected on these docket sheets. Neither the courts of the Unified Judicial
System of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania nor the Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts assume any liability for inaccurate or delayed
data, errors or omissions on these reports. Docket Sheet information should not be used in place of a criminal history background check which can
only be provided by the Pennsylvania State Police. Moreover an employer who does not comply with the provisions of the Criminal History Record
Information Act may be subject to civil liability as set forth in 18 Pa.C.S. Section 9183.
CRIMINAL DOCKET
Court Case
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
v.
Felton Hayman
ENTRIES
Sequence Number
CP Filed Date
10/27/2010
Document Date
Page 8 of 9
Filed By
O'Keefe, Joseph D.
11/18/2010
Mozenter, Robert B.
12/03/2010
O'Keefe, Joseph D.
03/05/2014
Mozenter, Robert B.
CPCMS 9082
Printed: 11/17/2014
Recent entries made in the court filing offices may not be immediately reflected on these docket sheets. Neither the courts of the Unified Judicial
System of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania nor the Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts assume any liability for inaccurate or delayed
data, errors or omissions on these reports. Docket Sheet information should not be used in place of a criminal history background check which can
only be provided by the Pennsylvania State Police. Moreover an employer who does not comply with the provisions of the Criminal History Record
Information Act may be subject to civil liability as set forth in 18 Pa.C.S. Section 9183.
CRIMINAL DOCKET
Court Case
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
v.
Felton Hayman
CASE FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Last Payment Date: 05/08/2009
Hayman, Felton
Page 9 of 9
Payments
Adjustments
Non Monetary
Payments
Total
$10.00
-$10.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$5.00
-$5.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$2.52
-$2.52
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
Costs/Fees Totals:
$17.52
-$17.52
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
Grand Totals:
$17.52
-$17.52
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
Defendant
Costs/Fees
CPCMS 9082
Printed: 11/17/2014
Recent entries made in the court filing offices may not be immediately reflected on these docket sheets. Neither the courts of the Unified Judicial
System of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania nor the Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts assume any liability for inaccurate or delayed
data, errors or omissions on these reports. Docket Sheet information should not be used in place of a criminal history background check which can
only be provided by the Pennsylvania State Police. Moreover an employer who does not comply with the provisions of the Criminal History Record
Information Act may be subject to civil liability as set forth in 18 Pa.C.S. Section 9183.