You are on page 1of 4

Since last, prehistoric individuals used the most powerful tool that the human ever made;the

group. With the sum up of different forces, humans have been able to reach and create unbelievable
things. From small societies till huge empires, groups have been the main strategy to deal with any
kind of problems;wars, projects, festivities...Due to all these kind of relations, social Psychology
appears. It began in the United States at the dawn of the 20th century but consolidate foundations
were developed in 18th century and those in the emerging field of social psychology were
concerned with developing concrete explanations for different aspects of human nature. Big names
at this time were Norman Triplett, Kurt Lewin or Stanley Milgram. Among those, one of them was
Max Ringelmann's, the first researcher in study the social loafing effect, one of the main axis of this
This effect can be simply define as the phenomenon of people exerting less effort to achieve a goal
when they work in a group than when they work alone. It must be differentiated from others no
related problems like coordination or individual differences. Social loafing effect has been
demonstrated in several experiments like “Rope-pulling experiments”(Max Ringelmann 1913)
where he had people pulling on a rope, and compared the maximum they could have pulled,
based on individual test, to how much each person actually pulled. Originals results are show in

the table 1.

Over 50 years later, Bibb Latané asked participants to judge cheering and applause, and also to
judge how loud these seem to those who hear them. The participants were asked to:
1º Clap or cheer as loudly as possible for 5 seconds

The combination of both can lead in lower efforts of individual when they are in collaborative environments. The average sound pressure generated per person decreased with increasing group size (p<0.they wait to see how much effort others will put into a group before do nothing .2ºJudge the noises. to increase one’s efforts when in the presence of others) whereas those who are less motivated are more likely to engage in social loafing. it is possible to find many different studies that always agree with the same 6 ones: Diffusion of responsibility/Evaluation potential:as the number of people grows in a group. "Sucker" effect/Aversion: people tend to think when they are working in a group that the rest is avoiding all the responsibilities creating a overload of work in the individual.001). Motivation :individuals who are more motivated are more likely to engage in social facilitation (that is. Results also confirmed the existence of social loafing effect. The noise produced did not grow in proportion to the number of people." . Both performers and observers were asked to guess how much noise had been produced. the deindividuation effect becomes stronger causing a decrease of personal accountability and dissociation from individual achievement. As the people don´t want to be the "sucker. This leads people not to contribute as much as they could. the idea of underestimation the contribution of own effort increases. About the causes of this effect. Dispensability of effort:as the size of the group increases.

Inevitably.Matching of effort: if people believes that some members of the group will slack. the one of optimal performance in a group. On the other hand and because the nature of the method. The main objective of this research was to explain how once the perception of optimal performance in a group is created inside the can be sure that this appraisal will be and objective one? Fortunately. According to Jackson and Harkins (1985) . it is included the term subjectivity since it is impossible to find to perceptions with the same characteristics between each other so. In the essence of that word. they feel that they can work less hard for the overall desired effect.4 more and more organizations are using teams or groups of employees to accomplish goals. the optimal performance concept itself is something that requires further researches in other to create some objectivity . Today´s world is focuses on reaching this concept due to the obvious implications. people may feel that there is a set level that the group needs to be achieved. These data can be used in further investigations for creating objective models that allow to evaluate the optimal performance in a more objective way.and if so. The other big axis of this research is about perception. he will slack. Consequently enterprises are always looking for the optimization and it is a fact that. Because of this. Sub-maximal goal setting: By setting a goal that is based on maximization. this is done in order to match the efforts of the rest. we are not looking for a objective method to evaluate the grade of optimization in a group. we collected the perception cues that generate on the individual. how it can lead in an unconsciousness social loafing effect. the believe of optimal performance. . one might ask if team performance can be reasonably appraised.