You are on page 1of 34

all-in-one.

pdf (jur77)
[title :] Who guards the guardians of justice in Strasbourg?
or
A decision « good for the East »
by
(to see also the name
[author:] S.P.
of the sender,(x) Page 13/34)
[source:] (x) http://steprom.atwebpages.com/
<----------\<CTRL+clic on x
[version / date:] « 2013.06 » / 2013-06-30 14:00
to follow link
[motto of the author:] what's wrong with signatures in .this pictures?

fig(1)
fig(2)
- - - <CTRL+clic on x to follow link------->

fig(1+2)=overlapping(1)and(2)
[details: see (x)Page 11/34 and next]

[abstract in a phrase:] This article treats of a forgery of signatures in a judicial
decision under the header of the 1st Section of the ECHR Court , delivered by mail, and the
response generated on this fact by the European judicial authorities and other non –
governmental organisations.
[abstract:] In law, in order to start an investigation of a crime, cause of prejudice
of an individual (such as falsification of signatures in a judicial decision or obstruction of
access of the individual to the same document, i.e. abuse of the office of Registrar /Clerk, ), a
procedural rule of EuroJust asks the presence of a 2nd prejudice - of prestige, of authority ,
a.s.o. - to a third legal person, generally institutions, named “third” below; « per a
contrario » , no prejudice means no investigation . In fact,
--the third, among others: the (1st Section of the) ECHR, the PACE (Parliamentary
Assembly) and the Committee of ministers of the Council of Europe, relativizes, especially
by silence, the right of access to the public documents by means of judicial ___ publication
___ by writing (concretely, the access to decision no. 54534/99 that should be, but according
to appearances, is not published in «Reports of judgments and decisions / Recueil des Arrêts
et décisions , 2001-VII» par Heymanns C., ISBN-10 : 3452254658; 530 pages)
--the third don't declare any prejudice concerning the aforesaid judicial __ non publication __ by writing; and therefore « per a contrario » no investigation is started to EuroJust ;
--a national public prosecutor's office rejected a complaint for infringement of forgery
« against an international jurisdiction» because of a treaty, in spite of the different opinions
in the doctrine .
[table of contents:]
#o. «intro»# # # # # # # # # # introduction . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . .(x) page 2/34
available also as separated file of .pdf type: intro.pdf
sum of control / CRC32: …......................................
1

#i. «micro» # # # # # # # # # brief letter (micro- petition)
pre- established letter of adherence by email, named «micro». . . . (x) page 4/34
in separated file: micro.pdf
sum of control / CRC32: ….........................................
#ia. «attach» # # # # # # # # # attachment for micro-letter. . . . . . . . . . (x) page 7/34
in separated file: attach.pdf
sum of control / CRC32: (Compatible: Total Commander 7.03)attach.pdf 8BD790DF
[to verify with :total commander/ files/ verifyCRC]
#ii. «mini» # # # # # # # # # minimal letter, or «mini». . . . . . . . . . . . .14/34
in separated file: mini.pdf
sum of control / CRC32: …......................................
#iii. «maxi» # # # # # # # # # extended letter, or «maxi». . . . . . . . . . . . 17/34
in separated file: maxi.pdf
sum of control / CRC32: ….....................................
#a. # # # # # # # # #
Appendices–list of files. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
either «list[e].pdf »
#b. # # # # # # # # #
Appendices–chronology. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
either «chrono[a30ii].pdf »
-----------#o. intro (content of « intro.pdf ») # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #
INTRODUCTION

34 /34
34/34

Prior note :
To the attention of those who have only about 5 min or who promote the essential to the
detriment of details: go directly to the page 3/34 ; it is a shortcut toward the first named
variant « micro » (petition by email; see the table of contents) ; this could be a starting point
for the other variants.
The main idea
in discussion : the present judicial system is sufficient to maintain the social order, or it is
necessary “to reinforce” it by extra - judicial means, including the restriction of the access
to the public documents?
The main event
is an atypical, bizarre - and, at least, doubtful, as for its authenticity - transmission of
documents under the heading of an European judicial institution. .
This event has
been followed of several tentative of a citizen pre- occupied of justice interested to clarify
it - including before of other judicial authorities - without any useful result, in a generally
no-friendly context for the access to the public documents.
The author doesn't intend a concrete analysis of reasons or a legitimate action
close to authorities (in accordance with their regulations), that after having received reactions
on behalf of recipients including authority, in a reasonable delay. At the same time,
the author puts questions and suggest explanations in a hypothetical analysis, in similar
situations, to the section « Instead of epilogue » in one of variants.
2

Variants :
The present text is an explanatory introduction to a letter in 3 variants
(micro, mini and maxi):
-a pre- established letter of adherence-support in favor of a (re - )analysis of a request
(simplified, situated in the section «micro», of the type « e-mail petition», advisable to the
physical, individual people or communities, promoting the essential to the detriment of
details - containing 2 ½ pages of text and several images, from page 3/34, based simply on
the direct interpretation of some images ; letter sent by e-mail, following a personal decision;
-a minimal letter (containing more details, situated in the section «mini», advisable in
principle to parliamentarians and diplomatic personnel, containing 3 pages from page 13/34,
included in the extended letter, by idented paragraphs ( moved from the left margin) , and
-an extended letter (in-extenso, situated in the section «maxi», advisable among others to the
legal persons and institutions, including press, containing 5 pages plus notes from page
16/34, documented in detail, accompanied of a « chronology » simplifying, letter easy to read
and maybe otherwise pleasant;
Structure of the letters:
micro (email)
mini (minimalist)
facts : page 4/34
facts :
-derivative and deducted by
interpretation of pictures
-'A'
page 14/34
demands :
page 13/34
-(re-)analyze and
-verification of documents

demands :
-'B'
page 14/34

maxi (extent)
facts :
-'A1' page 18/34
-'A2' page 18/34
-'A3' conclusions page 20/34
demands :
- 'B1' page 21/34
- 'B2' instead of the epilog
page 21/34

In version maxi (extent), facts of before and after the aforementioned main event are
organized in two sections (' A1 ' and ' A2 '), follow-up of conclusions ;
demands contain the section ' B1 ' and the section ' B2 ', « instead of the epilog ».
In the minimal version the two sections of facts form the unified section ' A', follow-up of the
demand section ' B'.
Notations : ___ x ___ = underlining of ' x'; [x] = x is optional ;
(Notes in brackets ‘[] ' (hooks) are optional.)
(x) = <CTRL+ click on x to follow link>
x/34 = page x of /34 from this file, e.g. 3/34 is this page; not to confound with
pag03--a55v.pdf which is a file of type .pdf [ notation imposed by reasons of compatibility
with a (former) version on paper].
Clarifications :
A copy on paper signed for conformity could arrive to your address, if it is necessary; with
proofs in the legal sense, and facsimiles, various useful materials in a possible investigation
will be able to be the object of supplementary clarifications. Documents at pages 7/34, 9/34
and 30-31/34 are available for forensic expertise.
3

#i. micro (content of « micro.pdf ») # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #
Pre- established letter of adherence and support, based on some pictures, send by mail –
e-mail or post or SMS,en favor of a (re - )analyze and correction of a decision.
Let us suppose there is, for example, a citizen named John Jack Doe - abbreviated [J. -J.D. ]
or [jjd], of the district(neighborhood) [Neuhof] of the city of [Strasbourg] - France [fr], titular
of address e-mail [jjdoe@yahoo.com], who, on the date of October 21, 2012 - abbreviated
[20121021], wants to send a mail of support.
What should he do ? :
[Brief : ]to transmit to Jean-Claude Mignon, president of the Parliamentary assembly of the
Council of Europe (address email : webmaster.assembly@coe.int / postal address : PACE,
Avenue of Europe F-67075 Strasbourg Cedex) a declaration of adherence - support in the
case S.P. v.[against] RO to ECHR, restrained in the attachment « attach.pdf » (enclosed), by
one of the three next ways (i1, i2,i3).
...............................................................................................................................................
i1. directly, by e-mail, illustrated by the window of an e-mail program
and some suggestions- instructions useful to facilitate the quick edition of the text.
[SUGGESTIONSSCREEN OF AN E-MAIL PROGRAM EDITOR
INSTRUCTIONS]
_________________________________________________ < CTRL+click on 1st addr,
/
\webmaster.assembly@coe.int,
| Insert addresses (separated by commas)
|open win.'new.message'[nm]
|To: webmaster.assembly@coe.int ,stelianPascanu@yahoo.com| < Copy ','+2nd addr/Paste
|
|in the new window [nm]
| Cc:
| (Click-dr :allow select.text
| Subject :
| Copy=Ctrl+C;Paste=Ctrl+V)
| adherence-support in the case S.P. v. RO to ECHR
| < Copy/Paste in [nm]
| to Jean-Claude Mignon, president of PACE
| < Copy/Paste in [nm]
| [Attach files]: attach.pdf
(1 Mo ) …
| <Click[Attach files]in [nm]
| (text:)
|
|__________________________________________________|
|| I read the file « attach.pdf » of the attachment
||
|| and I support demands - B1 & B2.( confirm the absence
||
||...&(re-)analyze the documents...);
date-place-sender:
||
|| 2012.10.21- uk-london-EastLondon- jjd- jjdoe@yahoo.com ||
|| [\date
\country\town \neighborhood\name\e-mail ] ||
||
|| < Copy/Paste in [nm]
||__________________________________________________||
| [Send] [Save as a Draft] [Cancel]
| < Click [Send] in [nm]
\__________________________________________________/
[In detail :]
(i1a) read the text of the file
attach.pdf (1 Mo) (enclosed, in the main packet, or in the following page) ;
and
4

(i1b)

(i1c)
(i1d)

decide if demands B1 and B2 :
B1. confirm the absence of a justice decision, in the official journal ; ,
B2. (re - )analyze [...] documents s in order to make corrections.
are just and supportable;
considering that demands are, to his/her opinion, just and supportable ,
before pressing the button “ send “ of the electronic mail (e-mail) program,
the page of the publisher must be prepared like in previous figure (SCREEN OF
AN E-MAIL...)
[possibly adding here, as option :
brief suggestions s; impressions and especially, similar situations].
It is necessary to signal to the applicant the postal consignment
toward the
president of the PACE; for e-mail ( electronic mail) , this role of signaling is
accomplished by the second part of the multiple address,stelianPascanu@yahoo.com.
press the button « send »
for consequences (answers, or other reactions, thanks,etc), please follow
[source:] http://steprom.atwebpages.com /

...............................................................................................................................................
i2. indirectly , by SMS (SMS = Short Message Service, on mobile phones), through the
applicant, to his phone number : +40728605986 ( in extreme lack of time situations, as an
exception, not recommended ) illustrated in this figures :
MOBILE : SCREEN - SMS - TEXT
_______________________
/
New Message
\
|_______________________ _ |
|I support demands in
|
| attach.pdf from the site
|
|STEPROM.atwebpages.com |
|
|
|2012.10.21|
|uk-london-EastLondon|
|jjd- jjdoe@yahoo.com
|
|.________________________.|
[options]
^
[Back]
|
<
O
>
|
| \
v
/ |
| [1 ]
[2 abc] [3 def]
|
| [4 ghi] [5 jkl] [6 mno]
|
| [7pqrs] [8 tuv] [9wxyz]
|
| [* ]
[0 + ]
[# ]
|
\_________________________/

MOBILE :SCREEN - SMS – PHONE NR..
_______________________
/
Sending
\
|_______________________ _ |
|To: +40728605986
|
|To:
|
|To:
|
|To:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
------->
|.________________________.|
[options]
^
[Back]
|
<
O
>
|
| \
v
/ |
| [1 ]
[2 abc] [3 def]
|
| [4 ghi] [5 jkl] [6 mno]
|
| [7pqrs] [8 tuv] [9wxyz]
|
| [* ]
[0 + ]
[# ]
|
\_________________________/

[In detail :]
In order to signal to the applicant the decision to support him , send a SMS message
to tel. +40728 605 986 ,
containing a text of identification (e-mail ID required
for possibly verification), for ex.:
“I support demands from attach.pdf on the site STEPROM. atwebpages.com
2012.10.21-uk-london-EastLondon-jjd-jjdoe@yahoo.com “
5

[\date \country\town \neighborhood\name\e-mail ]
where STEPROM stands both for
[case:]STElianPascanu v. ROMania and
[source:] http://STEPROM.atwebpages.com /
Based on SMS received, the applicant will re-transmit a postal message toward the president
of the PACE.
...............................................................................................................................................
i3. indirectly, by classic mail (paper and envelop ), through the applicant, to his address
(Destination, below), from Sender (below) :
PAPER
ENVELOP
_________________________
Dest. : Stelian Pascanu -address: 17,
|Message from J.-J.Doe to S.P. |
str. Suceava, apart. 1,
|_________________________|
300391 Timisoara, Department
| I support the demand in
|
Timis, Romania;
| attach.pdf from the site
|
Sender. : John Jack Doe
|STEPROM.atwebpages.com |
London-EastLondon..W1F-A6X-uk
|
|
______________________________
|2012.10.21|
|\
Dest. : …........
/|
| uk-london-EastLondon
|
| \
Sender. : ..............
/ |
|jjd- jjdeau@yahoo.com
|
|
\
/
|
|
| ------> |.
\
/
|
|
|
|
/\
/\
|
|
|
|
/
\__________/
\
|
|
|
|
/
\
|
|
|
| /
\ |
|_________________________|
|/____________________________\ |
Based on the received letter , the applicant will re-transmit a postal message toward the
president of the PACE.

6

---------------------------------------------------------------#ia. attach (content of the file « attach.pdf » ) # # # # # # # # # # # # :
---------------------------------------------------------------Extract- translation of 'APPENDIX 58' (below) from file (x) « pag29--a57R+a58.pdf »:
[...] The Court examined the applicant's allegations as they were presented and found that the
applicant was informed of any obstacles to its admissibility. Taking into account all the
evidence in its possession and to the extent to which shall have jurisdiction on allegations
made, it does not reveal any apparent violation of the rights and freedoms guaranteed by the
Convention or his Protocols. The application must therefore be dismissed by the application
of art. 35 # 4 of the Convention.
Accordingly, the Court
Declares the application inadmissible
[Section Registrar] Michael O'Boyle
[President] Wilhelmina Thomassen

7

fig. ' APPENDIX 58' from file (x)..\COMMONcommun\RESPONSESréponses\pag29-a57R+a58.pdf and extract of site [in dec.2012](x)« www.echr.coe.int/echr/en/hudoc/ » click
on /HUDOC Collections: /HUDOC database, select only Decisions / Admissibility, fill
Number of case /(''52534/99'') / Search –>result: 0[zero] results found (to read/verify:
view / zoom factor recommended : 200 )

8

fig. 'APPENDIX 69I' of file « pag08verso--a69i.pdf » and extract of site « www.echr.coe.
int/echr/fr/hudoc/ »;click on /HUDOC Collections: /HUDOC database, select only
Decisions / Admissibility,fill Nr. of case /(''52534/99'') / Search –>result: Cette recherche ne
9

donneaucun résultat /did not return any results (view / zoom factor recommended : 200 )

10

fig. 'APPENDIX 57R' of file « pag29--a58.pdf »+ translation en, fr
----------------------------------------------------------------

fig. 'APPENDIX 57R' + 'APPENDIX 58' ( overlapping)
----------------------------------------------------------------

(repetition to highlight )
fig(1)extract-APPENDIX 57 R appendix 57 R|
fig(2)extract-APPENDIX 58 appendix 58|
fig(1+2) overlapping 'APPENDIX 57R+58'

11

fig(1)

fig(1)
fig(2)

fig(1+2)

12

---------------------------------------------------------------text of attachment :
To the attention of
Jean-Claude Mignon, president of the Parliamentary assembly of the Council of Europe
(address email :
webmaster.assembly@coe.int)
If
1. pictures of the attachment under the header of the Council of Europe ( CoE ) represent
documents, printed, signed really and delivered on behalf of this institution ;
2. the snapshot excerpt of the Hudoc public data base from the official site of CoE is réel ;
then
A. I note irregularities:
A1. no. of file « 52534 / 99 » is not found ( « 0 [zero] results found ») in the Hudoc data
base,
A2. two signings of the clerk are overlapped, i.e. identical ;
B.I support the ___ demands ___ :
B1. to confirm the absence of named documents (as the decision), in the official public
publications (as the official journal) ;
B2. (re - )analyze, as seriously as possible, the named documents, in order to make
corrections and to give explanations.
----------------------------------------------------------------

13

# ii. mini (contents of "mini.pdf") # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #
Stelian Pascanu-address: 17, Suceava street, apartment 1, 300391 Timisoara,
Department Timis, Romania mail: stelianPascanu@yahoo.com tel.: +40728 605 986 to
.........................................
..........................................
Timisoara - Romania,. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Sir / Madam,
I inform you about A) the facts related to the lists of members in favor of access to public
documents, opened at the site "NouvelObs.com" on November 20, 2007 and "Access Info
Europe" - where the undersigned is co-signer in November 2008, and a some subsequent
malfunctions B) requests.
A)
. -The applicant has made a request for information on the publication of
. a decision in the Official Journal of the ECHR, but the response of the
. Registry of the 1st Section of the ECHR do not make any mention.
. (See page /34 ANNEX 59i, note [*0010]).
.
. The applicant did send by registered Italian mail a certified letter [*0016]
. to Mr. J. B. signatory to the list at NovelObs and member support of the
. said access to documents; no response has arrived at the address of the
. applicant by national postal service or otherwise; by the said letter, the
. applicant sought the support of Transparency International (TI) for
. access to a copy of a decision of the ECHR; note the
. communication by foreign postal service.
.
. - The applicant submitted an administrative request on paper to an Assistant Secretary
. of the European Commission on the same subject, the accession to a certified copy ,
. supposedly included to the internal Commission's documentation [*0022] request
. including in appendices, among other things, the letter to Mr. J. B.; the
. applicant acknowledged receipt of an email message in response containing
. the recommendation to repeat the same previous steps, without mention of
. said internal documentation of the Commission [*0023]; note the communication by
. internet, without delivery from national postal service.
.
.
.
.
.
.

[-A letter on the same subject, the accession to a certified copy addressed to
Transparency International (TI) Brussels [*0031], remained unanswered,
result of an implied refusal, according to the national postal service: "the recipient
was not present to take the sending "[*0032].]

B) requests:

14

search the public database Hudoc, the official website of the CoE for file (folder)
no. 52534/99 of the aforementioned decision (at internet address:
www.echr.coe.int/echr/fr/hudoc/ or www.echr.coe.int/echr/en/hudoc/);
confirm or infirm the
___ presence ___
of file no. 52534/99 in the database;
the answer is expected as one of the binary logic values: "YES" for the presence or "NO" for
the non-presence (absence);
[In other words, it is equivalent to the statement on page 17/34
'' A. I notice irregularities:
A1. File no. "52534/99" is not found ("0 [zero] results found") in the Hudoc database for
the “micro” letter.]
If you are in possession of the book named below, or in the situation to consult,
.
. -Check if the official journal book, "Reports of judgments and
. Decisions / Recueil des Arrêts et décisions 2001-VII "by C. Heymanns,
. ISBN-10: 3452254658, 530 pages
.
___ Contains ___
. the file number and the name of the applicant:
. "52534/99 - Stelian Pascanu c / Romania"
.
. (As a succession of alphanumeric characters), the answer is
. expected as a binary logic values: "YES" or "NO";
.
. -If such claims can not be done, let me know your
. opinion on the right of access to such information by the undersigned; if your opinion is
. favorable, please record it in writing, in the same binary logic, in a
. non-contestable formula, such as "the applicant
. ___ has ___ the right to know the decision of the European Court in Strasbourg
. by public___ publication___, including by the official journal. ";
``
. -Any other contribution to unravel the mysteries / unanswered.questions will be welcome;
Please accept Sir / Madam,
Stelian Pascanu / ____________________
-------------------------------------------------- ---------------------- Notes:
[*0010] pag30 - a59i + a62.pdf
[See below an extract from a facsimile of the Annex 59i,
Page 71/85 File-pag08 a69vii.pdf]
[ECHR / C. of E. ]
FIRST SECTION
ECHR-LF11.2R Strasbourg on 6 August 2001
15

CSA / RFT
52534/99 (inadmissible)
[...]
When your application for a certified copy of the decision [...] I note that this document
already sent to you attached to the letter of January 5, 2001
[...] Section Registrar (Clerk)
[*0016]
pag19 - 69viii - ti – no.pdf
[*0022] pagX32 - a69viii-ue2.pdf
[*0023] pag34-a69viii - UE2-r.pdf

[*0031]
pagX36 - a75-IT-EA - fr + en.pdf
pagX37 - a75-IT-EA - de.pdf
pag36 - a75-TI-p.pdf
pag37 - a75-TI - EA - ret.pdf
pag37-back-a75-TI - EA - ret.pdf
pag38 - a75-TI - EA - ro - ret.pdf

postal return
postal return
postal return

[*0032] "destinatarul nu s-a prezentat sa-si ridice timiterea" - in original

16

# iii. max (content "maxi.pdf") # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #
Stelian Pascanu address: 17, Suceava str., apartment 1, 300391 Timisoara,
Department Timis, Romania - email: stelianPascanu@yahoo.com tel.: +40728 605 986,
to . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . .
Timisoara - Romania,. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.
Motto: "... readers should especially be good
.
writers ... ideally columnists ... there's a music, a tone [...]
.
then there's the humor "- Nicolas Hubé- Readers mail.A.
.
profane journalistic word?
.
.
Motto - Supplement:
.
Here is a sample of overlapping signatures in two
.
documents under the heading of an European institution,
.
in facsimile.
..
(inclined writing figures the second document, the
.
red line surrounds the two overlapping signatures):

.
[jur58iiext '. jpg]
.
Select / tick one or more boxes (letters a..f )
.
the aforesaid overlapping explains [ ;-) ]:
. a. economy of consumables (ink), due to
. economic crisis ;
. b. imminent [yet! ], but not yet effective, inauguration
. of the famous European Public Prosecutor;
. c. lack of "jurisdiction to deal with complaints
. against an international court, "according to the Prosecutor's Office of
. TGI Strasbourg, after several months of reflection;
. d. "Business climate" and a "sense of public corruption"
. denounced by a former Attorney General at the “Cour de Cassation”;
. e. restricted, summarized procedure, during summer judicial vacancy;
.(period July, 1 to August, 31)
. f. solution such as "good for the East."
17

. - Excerpt from a (draft) Test grid collection of problems
. ... June2020 by anonymous author.
Dear Sir / Madam,
First section.........................................................................................................facts (A1) ..
When Philip the Fair listened the first oaths of judges in order to allow judgments he did not
thought that after 700 years, in the other side of Europe, a precipitated democracy will
innovate by changing order: first judgments, than oaths. Despite its public knowledge (in
parliament, media - see note [*01]), the "new order" has been applied in practice, including in
the case of a citizen ("the applicant", “the plaintiff”), its request for injustice correction
arriving at the (former) Commission of Human Rights, and then to a section of the ECHR see a receipt [*02] - which started work about said subject; after 11 years, according to
appearances, it still works.
Showing the same spirit of innovation, and to cope with the "avalanche" of litigants from
aforesaid side of Europe, which has frightened so many observers, someone - perhaps being
an employee of a Permanent Mission – has signed for Clerk two documents under the
heading of the Council of Europe and the ECHR, but - surprise! - without posting it on the
official website www.echr.coe.int / hudoc (a'' search'' command replies "0 [zero] results
found" or "This research gives no result" - see note [*03]), and even without worry about a
strange overlapping of signatures [*04]; here is a symbolic return to the justice before Philip
the Fair [*05].
Clarifying the status of file no. 52534/99 (is he real?), or. the absence / the presence of the
reference file in the Official Journal of the ECHR - this is a real "St. Grail ", i.e. most of this
letter and this case, reduced essentially to access to a public document.
Such
"production" of documents, so surprising, but so simple and so Gordium-ian [*06] has
surprised many officials, of which almost everyone thought and still think for clarification:
public prosecutor, a committee of ministers, non-governmental organizations, members of
PACE (Parliamentary Assembly), institutions of the Union. Chronicles of the steps is too
long, but chronicles of the response is rather short see notes [*07], [*08] and - again, what
a surprise! - also suffers from a similar "production" of documents (see ''response'' of the
secretariat of the Committee of Ministers, two paragraphs down).
Second section …........................................................................................facts (A2)..
. (common paragraph, see also note [*09])
. -The applicant has made a request for information on the publication
. of a decision in the Official Journal of the ECHR, but the response of the
. Registry of the 1st Section of the ECHR do not make any mention.
. (See page /34 ANNEX 59i, note [*0010])
.
To paraphrase a classic: the Public Prosecutor at the Regional Court in Strasbourg has learned
he talk "in prose" without knowing (criminal prose - see note [*11]), at four paces from here
(near the Palace of Europe in Strasbourg) and required eight months of reflection, to respond
to an applicant's criminal complaint: "[the prosecutor] has no jurisdiction to deal with
complaints against an international court," disregarding the doctrine, which says that "the
immunity may be refused to avoid the risk of denial of justice" [*12] and, disregarding,
again, the Belgian criminal procedure in a similar situation concerning the European
18

Parliament [*13] and, again, not to mention the comments that the press made public on
public climate [*14].
The Secretariat of the Committee of Ministers treated a claim of the applicant in an classic
administrative way, delivering it directly to an official who answered in the spirit in which
the claimed part did earlier, by mail without specifying the name of the sender on the
envelope; here is the second "production" of non-compliant documents under the heading of
the Council of Europe [*15].
.
. The applicant did send by registered Italian mail a certified letter [*0016]
. to Mr. J. B. signatory to the list at NouvelObs and member support of the
. said access to documents; no response has arrived at the address of the
. applicant by national postal service or otherwise; by the said letter, the
. applicant sought the support of Transparency International (TI) for
. access to a copy of a decision of the ECHR; note the
. communication by foreign postal service.
"Mother Europe" - or perhaps "Bitter Europe," according to the preferences [*17] - isn't
exaggerating, also, in favor of public access to documents [*18], to no longer recall the
famous European Public Prosecutor promised for years, which could deal with the
restriction of access by criminal means; moreover, total silence on the theory of pillars, in an
addressed letter [*19].
Two divisions of the European Commission are expressed in
European dialect, one providing a free lesson, not sought, of administrative law categorizing
the trial as "problems of general administration of justice" [*20] and on the other side
containing the recommendation in implicit response, to reiterate, sometimes for the third
time, the same previous approaches [*21].
.
. - The applicant submitted an administrative request on paper to an Assistant Secretary
. of the European Commission on the same subject, the accession to a certified copy ,
. supposedly included to the internal Commission's documentation [*0022] request
. including in appendices, among other things, the letter to Mr. J. B.; the
. applicant acknowledged receipt of an email message in response containing
. the recommendation to repeat the same previous steps, without mention of
. said internal documentation of the Commission [*0023]; note the communication by
. internet, without delivery from national postal service.
Neither EuroJust does not feel better - so to speak - even ignoring accuses of corruption to
the address of the former president, his problem is internal affair; the applicant's request for
investigation about his request was denied apparent lack of prejudice expressed explicitly by
a third party, prejudice that is a normative requirement by the procedural rules of EuroJust
(implicitly confirmed in a letter of reply - see "pag35 – a74-ej-in-r.pdf");
it appears
that two complaints made by the applicant to two representatives (Cons. of E. and PACE)
were not sufficient to access their agendas,in order to suggest a prejudice [*24]. It also
appears (is it right?) that a last cryptic and sibylline reminiscence of the spirit of duty finally
emerged in the paragraph of the list of documents; in fact, the only document mentioned
among the dozens received by EuroJust concerns (is it the true path to said "St. Grail "? - Yes,
that is it, you have already guessed, that is ...) the prosecutor; would - they be true the
19

observations that the press made on public climate? (See also [*14]), and again, would it be
true some discreet intervention of a reputed NGO from overseas and one of its continental
sections [*25] to deliver at least one response of the prosecution, even unfavorable, even after
8 months? (To note the thanks of the applicant - notes [*26]).
Two other letters sent to an embassy [*27] and another addressed to TI (Tribunal d'Instance)
Strasbourg containing a simple standard type request for a copy[*28];
another addressed to the Sub-Committee on Human Rights of the European Parliament
[*29] and several addressed to Transparency International (TI) [*30] [*0031], all on the
subject of accessing a legal copy of the aforesaid decision , also remained
___unanswered ___.
[Notation: ___ x ___ = underline 'x' by the author]
.
. -A letter on the same subject, the accession to a certified copy addressed to
. Transparency International (TI) Brussels [*0031], remained unanswered,
. result of an implied refusal, according to the national postal service: "the recipient
. was not present to take the sending "[*0032].
.
Instead of conclusions: ............................................... A3
These are the conditions of widespread rejection
[abstract:] In law, in order to start an investigation of a crime, cause of prejudice
of an individual (such as falsification of signatures in a judicial decision or obstruction of
access of the individual to the same document, i.e. abuse of the office of Registrar /Clerk, ), a
procedural rule of EuroJust asks the presence of a 2nd prejudice - of prestige, or authority ,
etc - to a third legal person, generally institutions, named “third” below; « per a contrario » ;
no prejudice means no investigation . In fact,
--the third, among others: the (1st Section of the) ECHR, the PACE (Parliamentary
Assembly) and the Committee of ministers of the Council of Europe, relativizes, especially
by silence, the access to the public documents by means of judicial ___ publication ___ by
writing (concretely, the access to decision no. 54534/99 that should be, but according to
appearances, is not published in «Reports of judgments and decisions / Recueil des Arrêts et
décisions , 2001-VII» par Heymanns C., ISBN-10 : 3452254658; 530 pages)
--the third don't declare any prejudice concerning the aforesaid judicial __ non publication __ by writing; and therefore « per a contrario » no investigation is started to EuroJust ;
--a national public prosecutor's office rejected a complaint for infringement of forgery
« against an international jurisdiction» because of a treaty, in spite of the different opinions
in the doctrine .
Under these conditions, would be somebody surprised by the resolution of the High
Commissioner for Human Rights in Geneva ?: [ which ]"is not able to attend [you...] for
reasons [... : -The] complaint is being considered or has been considered by the [ECHR …]
-The State Party has made a reservation to the Optional Protocol or to the International
Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, under which your complaint can not be considered ";
which essentially is, in judicial slang, a negative conflict of jurisdiction (see APPENDIX 62
- note [*33]).
The complainant requests: ............................................................................requests (B1) ..
. [Subsection -common, see [*09]]
20

. -Check if the book extract: Official journal "Reports of judgments and
. Decisions / Recueil des Arrêts et décisions 2001-VII "by C. Heymanns,
. ISBN-10: 3452254658, 530 pages
. ___ Contains ___ [emphasis added]
. the file number and the name of the applicant:
. "52534/99 - Stelian Pascanu c / Romania"
.
. (As a succession of alphanumeric characters), the answer is
. expected as a binary logic values: "YES" or "NO";
.
.Check the reality of the document issued by the Secretariat of the Committee of Ministers –
reference to recall "SP / iw" September 1, 2006 (see the answer - mr-ANNEX 69viii and
envelope - APPENDIX 69viii-mp file "pag32 - a69viii-m-p+r.pdf" in correlation with the
query - APPENDIX 69viii-m the "pag09 - a69viii - m.pdf"); expected answer: "YES" to real
authentic document or "NO" to false document;
.
investigation, based on said checks and based on the own regulations of the ECHR, taking
into account the epilogue (15 lines down, this page)
.
. -If such claims can not be done, let me know your
. opinion on the right of access to such information by the undersigned; if your opinion is
. favorable, please record it in writing, in the same binary logic, in a
. non-contestable formula, such as "the applicant
. ___ has ___ the right to know the decision of the European Court in Strasbourg
. by public___ publication___, including in the official journal. ";
-Any other contribution to unravel the mysteries / unanswered. questions will be welcome;
the applicant requests support to retransmit to recipients unanswered letters or without
acknowledgment of receipt ( may - be because of postal services, or other services ?),
whereas the answers are interesting, including journalistically.
Instead of epilogue ............................................ ....................................... (B2)
In the same case, in an excerpt from "pag29-0-a54R, pdf" under the heading of the (former)
Commission of Human Rights, without stamp, and with signature "for” the Secretary of the
Commission EHR, the same officiant gives practically a verdict (translation): "[...] the request
that you present is premature," despite the fact that she was referring to a legal final and
irrevocable decision; this document, also is not found in ___ any ___ public official
database.
The document is dated 12 November 1997, during the period from 1997 to 2000 of the
Ministry of justice, responsible at that time for the relationship with the ECHR. Also note that
the document "pag32 - a69viii-m-p+r.pdf" was manufactured on September 1, 2006 during
the period from 2005 to 2007 of the Ministry of External Affairs , responsible at that time for
the same relationship.
Moreover, the press reported in a legal journal such other malfunctions on the same officiant,
named in the criminal complaint "C. Sandru ": "[a] request is not considered registered
21

[despite] the art 47.5 of the Rules of Court. "- see [*34]
As for the international media, the NouvelObs and Access Info Europe have already been
mentioned as critics of the transparency policy of the Council, by opening lists of member
protesters, including the applicant; the site “leschroniques.net” explains on judicial, historical
and sociological perspective the phenomenon of
"denial of justice characterized by an intolerable infringement on the most basic human
rights, to be tried by a court" certifying officers of the ECHR in good faith and honesty; the
applicant appreciates that in the first instance, the editors of the site will refuse to believe
and to publish any of the accuses of this letter.
All approaches to elucidating have resulted in equivocal responses on
authenticity, or also not found in ___ any ___ public official databases ; the ___ only ___
evidence of genuine response from the institution named "ECHR" seems to be [*35] the
receipt / delivery of the complaint, see "pag03 - a55v.pdf."
Can an entity of almost ½ billion Europeans (E.U.) or 800 millions (CoE) manage something
as simple as the identification of a responsible for infringement of forgery, in ___ their ___
European institutions ? (Remember E.U. wants to be part of CoE as an Member Entity).
After posting dozens and dozens of equivocal pages about European justice in years
and years, ___ and after all ___, is it mandatory for said justice to find and punish that
responsible ?
What can they say about the ethics of the officiants, in a political
environment claimed to be submitted to high (and maybe divine ?) moral commandments,
environment situated in key decision positions, for years and years?
Were they wright
the high-rank exponents of this environment when they warned about possible contagion with
corruption of the “hard-core” of the European establishment from the “new-comers” from the
said “other side of Europe” ?; towards a « peripheral European » corruption or towards a
pure-and-simple « European » corruption ?
[The main idea in discussion ]: the present judicial system is sufficient to maintain the
social order, or it is necessary “to reinforce” it by extra - judicial means, including the
restriction of the access to the public documents?
What is the limit of hypocrisy
of an authority, even European, which in a simple patron- employee conflict , goes
openly alongside the patron, by favoring him with a procedure not only
immoral, but plainly illicit ?
What have to say, in this case, the defenders of the
famous « protestant work» ethic or the «center-left-wing caviar » supporters, after denying
for more than 15 years of trial/judgment the right to work by such means ?
Is it
“abject”(i.e.: despicable, vile, wretched, by an explanatory dictionary ) or "abject cowardice"
sufficient to describe said hypocrisy ?
Where is the famous principle of « equality of
weapons »of the two sides ?
What are the performance criteria of the justice done at
the ECHR after more than 15 years of trial, without results published in the Official Journal?
And by extension, what is the effectiveness of a famous "mechanism for
cooperation and verification" best known by its abbreviation, "M.C.V.", if the filter did not
retained any reference to this file for a long time?
This "M.C.V." error is a purely
technical issue of "general justice administration" or there are other reasons, less technical?
Perhaps the resemblance of some political color?
In this case, it seems the
solution is only one of prefabricated items "made in Europe.” which comes from the EU see the European Commission in Brussels and from the Council- see the Venice Commission
22

- on a rolling tape eastward together with others, including some guidelines of "good
practice". government [from Brussels] or an - already famous - referendum procedure with
cvorum during the summer of 2012, concerning the representative of a Member State [from
Venice].
Is it applicable the concept of "state terrorism" – and by extension, of an entity with state
characteristics - in this case? (see definition of terror [*36]).
Remember that in
an article on this notion Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia mentions as the first method of state
terrorism – and by extension, of such an entity -"expeditious (fast) courts” , and superficial
(including the fastest, those who avoid the publication of their decisions - to save time, isn' t
it?)" although that term is applicable in the present situation only in non-violent sense.thanks to God ? - till now .
Here is a comparison with two terms / situations:
1. on one hand, in European law:
the [''']principle of publicity / publication of court documents seems to be [']excepted from
application for at least (according to author) one of the litigants from ['']<<the other side of
the Europe >>;
2. on the other hand, in his book <<About the native population. Anatomy of a legal
"monster": colonial law >> Olivier Le Cour Grandmaison wrote:
So the political and [']legal exception of the colonial legislation becomes the rule for
['']<<Natives>>. Colonial law is a [''']<<law without principle>> [...]
or, in a synopsis of common / similar concepts in two columns:
1.
|
2.
['].
excepted [from application] |
[legal] exception
[''].
<<The other side of Europe >>
|
<<Natives>>
[''']
the principle of publicity[excepted | <<law without principle>>
from appl.]|
Finally, a riddle: which other law the European law begins to look like ?
The applicant determines its response, concerning the main idea, depending on recipients of
the letters, within a reasonable time.
Please accept, Madam / Sir,
Stelian Pascanu / ____________________
-------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------- Notes
[*01]:
[extract -translation from the journal «Ziua» ("The Day") of 1995-11-21" - see facsimiles of
files "pag03--Ziua1995112??. jpg" ( ?? = 1a, 1b, 2a, 2b, 1a--, 1b-- )]
----------------------------------------------------------------

23

pag03--Ziua19951121a. jpg

24

[Paragraph] The "D. Effect" paralyzes Justice […] [i.e. The effect of the lack of
irremovability - D.=Dide is the name of the initiator-- note of sollicitant]
Justice [...] is violently jolted by the "D. Effect". Judges without irremovability are unable
to exercise their profession. The [...] judges are challenged by lawyers, saying the
"Exception D." became __ common knowledge__. Thousands of proceedings [...]
are likely to be affected by nullity.
[Title] Courts [...] have been bombarded with "Exceptions D." – by Rasvan Savaliuc
[That is to say, lack of irremovability ...] citizens and their advocates have raised the
"Exception D." showing the courts that they do not want their lawsuits are tried by judges
who have no irremovability [...]
[Title] [...] by Magdalena .Dumitru - The refusal of irremovability may attract legal tragic
consequences […] MD: The time expressly provided by the Act is imperative.
[Title] The Court of Brasov in disarray [...] by M.Petrascu
[...] Have invoked the exception of the lack of irremovability requested by the mandatory
provisions of the Act [...]
[*02] see below jur55v.jpg
or file pag03 - a55v. Pdf
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 25

[ jur55v.jpg]

26

[*03] see page 8/34
(or pag08verso - a69i.pdf)
[*04]
see fig(1 +2) "overlapping" ANNEX 58II on page 11/34
[ ANNEX 58II or page 24/46 File-pag03 a69vii.pdf
or jur18ext'jpg]
[*05] ... and even before the Carolingian period, during which Alcuin (796-800), Chancellor
of Charlemagne, a kind of European Commissioner for JIA (Justice & Internal Affairs) avantla-lettre, was responsible for "internal documents" containing the equivalent of an official
journal.
[*06] "The Gordian Knot is a legend of Phrygian Gordium associated with Alexander the
Great. It is often used as a metaphor for an intractable problem solved easily by means of
cheating or "outside the box". ("Cutting the Gordian knot") "[wikipedia]
[*07] Appendices-requests and [see details in ..\COMMONcommun\list[e].pdf],pag*-r.txt,
[*08] Appendices-responses, chronologically in two sections:
,pag*--nr.txt]
==========Directory ..\COMMONcommun\DEMANDeS ==========
bytes/octets <DIR> comun
779,275

pag03--a55v.pdf queja CEDH/ complaint ECHR/reque^ete CEDH, note of
(Es)

(En)

(Fr)Receipt\ Avis de Réception

593,807

pag04--a67.pdf letra Embajada/letter Embassy/lettre Ambass.France

32,934

pag05--a69viii--f.pdf f= Embajada /Embassy/Ambass.France

1,887,814 pag06--a69viii--f--ar.pdf ’’ ar= AvisoDeRecibo/note of Receipt/Avis de Réception
1,893,353 pag07--a69ii.pdf queja /complaint/plainte TI (Trib.d’Instance -standard-cerfa)
959,028

pag08--a69vii.pdf denuncia penal/criminal compl./plainte pénale TGI/Trib.Grande
Instance

1,107,101 pag08--a69vii--res.pdf ‘’ res=resumen/abstract/RESumé
875,626

pag08verso--a69i.pdf extracto/ extract/extrait

37,735

pag09--a69viii--m.pdf m=pres.comité/pres.of commitee of/pres.du comité des
Ministres

40,378 pag10--a69viii--ai.pdf ai=Amnesty Int'l, Paris
38,601 pag10-1--a69viii--ti.pdf ti=Transp. Int'l, Paris
26,546 pag10verso--a69i--b.pdf extracto/ extract/extrait
43,044 pag11--a69viii--ue.pdf ue=Direccion/Direction/Direction JAI commission EU
50,227 pag13--a69viii-cm2--en+fr+ru.pdf cm2=comité/commitee of/comité des Ministres, ru
1,515,080 pag15--a69viii-cm2-ru-p.pdf 2AvisosDeRecibo/2 notes of Receipt/2 Avis de
27

Réception
39,755

pag16--a69viii--ap-ch.pdf ap=PAce/APce,ch=Suiza/Switzerland/Conf.Hélvetique

1,704,837 pag17--a69viii-ap-ch-tr2.pdf
543,284

pag18--a69viii-ap-ch-ar2.pdf ar= AvisoDeRecibo /note of Receipt/Avis de
Réception

87,872

pag19--a69viii-ti-no--en+fr+no.pdf ti=Transp.Int'l, no=Noruega/Norway/Norv`ege

1,128,649 pag21--a69viii-ti-no-ar.pdf ar= AvisoDeRecibo/note of Receipt/Avis de Réception
77,889

pag22--a69viii--scdh.pdf scdh= Subcomisión Derechos Humanos/sub/Sous
Commission hum.Rights/Droits Hum.

33,521

pag23--a69viii--me.pdf me= DefensorDelPueblo/Eur. ombudsman/Médiateur Eur.

1,573,305 pag24--a69viii--scdh-adr.pdf
51,497

pag25--a69x-pr.pdf pr= correo Ro[rumano]/posta Ro /Ro mail/ poste Ro

1,605,075 pag27--a69xi-fr-en.pdf extract/extrait Ziua 2007-apr-04 "Mail Anti-ECHR"/
/"Poste Anti-CEDH";extracto Ziua2007-avr-04 "Cprreo Anti-CEDH"
1,203,697 pag28--a69xi.pdf

‘’

67,439

pagX29--a72.pdf

Amnesty Int'l Londres

32,804

pagX30--a72--en.pdf

"

London

1,377,819 pagX31-0--a72-en-adr.pdf
37,997 pagX32--a69viii-ue2.pdf ue2= Secretario Adjunto/Assist.Secr./Secr.Adj.
commission EU
385,919 pagX33--a69viii-ue2_JPG.PDF
271,531 pagX33--a69viii-ue2-en_JPG.PDF
1,610,172 pagX34--a69viii-ue2-en-tr.pdf
179,862 pagX35--a74-ej-en.PDF

ej=EuroJust

352,710 pagX36--a75-TI_EA-en-fr.PDF

TI_EA=Transp. Int'l Eu+Asia

307,347 pagX37--a75-TI_EA-de.pdf
117,883 pagX38--a75-TI_ro.PDF

TI_ro=Transp. Int'l Ro

158,096 pagX38verso--a75-TI_en+fr.pdf
281,075 pagX39--a69viii-craj-ro.pdf craj-ro=centro contra la corrupción en la justicia
/justice anticorruption center/ centre [de ressources] anticorruption en justice
214,734 pagX39verso--a69viii-craj-ro.pdf

’’

38,583 pagX39--a69viii-craj-en+fr.pdf
38,542 pagX39verso'--a69viii-craj-en+fr.pdf
104,684 pagX40--a75-TI_ro+craj-ro-ar_a.PDF ar= AvisoDeRecibo /note of

28

Receipt/AvisDeRéception
105,110 pagX40--a75-TI_ro+craj-ro-ar_b.PDF

craj-ro=centro…/center…/ centre…

91,758 pagX40verso--a75-TI_ro+craj-ro-ar_a.PDF
526,581 pagX40verso--a75-TI_ro+craj-ro-ar_b.PDF
=========Directory ..\COMMONcommun\RESPONSESréponses ==========
- - - -- - - - - - - - -notation -r=Response[Réponse] - - - - - - - - -- - - - 150,065

pag29-0--a54R+54.pdf (vieja /former/ancienne)Commission EHR/EDH

864,524

pag29--a57R+a58.pdf

1,309,148 pag30--a59i+a62.pdf

CourteCEDH /Court ECHR/CourCEDH
primeraSeccionCEDH/1st/1ereSection ECHR/CEDH+

Alto Comisionado de lasNacionesUnidas /High CommissionerUNO/HautCommissaire.ONU
843,150

pag31--a69viii-ai-r.pdf ai=Amnesty Int'l, Paris

843,150

pag31--a69vii-r.pdf

TGI /Trib. Grande Instance

1,059,415 pag32--a69viii-m-p+r.pdf m= pres/pres.of commitee /pres.du comité des Ministres
1,660,599 pag33--a69viii-ue-r.pdf ue= Direccion/Direction/Direction JAI commission EU
47,672

pag33-1--a69x-pr--en+fr-r.pdf pr= Correo Ro /Ro mail/ poste Ro

992,341

pag34--a69viii-ue2-r.pdf ue2= Secr.Adj./Assist.Secr./Secr.Adj. commission EU

808,199

pag35--a74-ej-en-r.pdf ej=EuroJust

1,889,374 pag36--a75-TI-p.pdf

retour, cubierta /envelop/enveloppe

90,858

pag36--a75-TI-EA-ret-a.PDF retour

73,025

pag36--a75-TI-EA-ret-b.PDF ’’

662,276

pag37--a75-TI_EA-p.pdf retour

44,787

pag37verso--a75-TI_EA-p-a.pdf retour

241,323

pag37verso--a75-TI_EA-p-b.pdf ’’

325,373

pag38--a75-TI-EA-ro-ret-a.PDF

328,842

pag38--a75-TI-EA-ro-ret-b.PDF ’’

38,751

pag38verso--a75-TI-EA-fr+en-ret.pdf ’’

Correo Ro /Ro mail/ poste Ro

- - - - - -- - - - -notation --nr=NoResponse[PasDeRéponse] - - - - - - - - -- - 78 pag04--a67--nr.txt

Embajada /Embassy/Ambass.

151 pag05--a69viii--f--nr.txt

f= Embajada /Embassy/Ambass.

86 pag07--a69ii--nr.txt

TI (Trib.d’Instance)

112 pag10-1--a69viii--ti--nr.txt

ti=Transp. Int'l, Paris

186 pag13--a69viii-cm2--en+fr+ru--nr.txt comité/commitee of/comité des Ministres, ru
240 pag16--a69viii--ap-ch--nr.txt ap=PAce/APce, ch=Suiza/Switzerland/Conf.Hélvetique
180 pag19--a69viii-ti-no--en+fr+no--nr.txt ti=Transp. Int'l, no=Noruega/Norway/Norv`ege

29

235 pag22--a69viii--scdh--nr.txt

scdh= Subcomisión Derechos Humanos/sub/Sous
Commission hum.Rights/Droits Hum.

160 pagX29--a72--nr.txt
606 pagX36--a75-TI_EA-en-fr-de-nr.txt TI_EA=Transp. Int'l Eu+Asia
95 pagX38--a75-TI_ro--nr.txt Transp. Int'l Romania
334 pagX39--a69viii-craj-ro--nr.txt craj-ro=centro contra la corrupción en la justicia
/justice anticorruption center/ centre [de ressources] anticorruption en justice
[*09] Subsections Identes (offset from the margin, flush right) are
common to letters mini[minimum] and maxi[extended].
[*0010] pag30 - a59i + a62.pdf
[See below an extract from a facsimile of the Annex 59i,
Page 71/85 File-pag08 a69vii.pdf]
[ECHR / C. of E. ]
FIRST SECTION
ECHR-LF11.2R Strasbourg on 6 August 2001
CSA / RFT
52534/99 (inadmissible)
[...]
When your application for a certified copy of the decision [...] I note that this document
already sent to you attached to the letter of January 5, 2001
[...] Registrar (Clerk) of the Section
[*11] intellectual false, forgery, abuse in office, usurpation (theft) of official etc.;
the first two correspond to the French- C.Pénal art.441-1-al.1 and 2 and appear
together with the type of the competent court (TGI) as conclusions, following
an analysis, in the file "pag08-2 - a69vi-bis.pdf "annexed to the criminal complaint.
This file is the result of the execution of an "expert system" program, similar to programs
already accepted as a accessory means of reasoning in some instances, programs that
generate conclusions, line by line, by drawing step-by-step, each inference cycle..
[*12]
"For its part, the French "Cour de Cassation" in the name of the preservation of international
relations, uphold the immunity of the foreign state in question on the right of access to justice
protected by ConvEHR Article 6 (Report of the "Cour de Cassation" in 1995, French
documentation, p. 418-419). However, when it is to deprive the plaintiff of any opportunity to
take legal action against a State or an international organization, the immunity may be refused
to avoid the risk of denial of justice (CA Paris, 7 October 2003, Gaz. Pal. No. 15 2005 p. 2) "taken from: Adversarial relationship between immunity and impunity - Commentary on
article by Prof. Dr. Paech, "Staatenimmunität und Kriegsverbrechen" in Archiv des
Völkerrechts by Noémie Coutrot-Cieslinski | M2BDE
30

[*13] http://www.roportal.ro/stiri/cazul-severin-transparency-international-cere-anchetabelgiana-o-corespondenta-de-la-magda-3332360.htm
Saturday, March 26, 2011 at 2:07 pm Print
If "Severin" - Transparency International calls for investigation in Belgium. Correspondence
Magdalena Moreh.
The Brussels office of Transparency International has asked the Belgian authorities to take
over the investigation of 3 members [European Parliament], including [AS], who took [the]
money to various amendments to EU legislation. […] should the Belgian federal authorities
take the 3 [members], taking into account the allegations of corruption [which] took place on
Belgian territory.
[*14] "The investigation of the [Nouvel]Obs> EXCLUSIVE. Jean-Louis Nadal:"They
disfigured the justice "... By Agathe Logeart (excerpt) << For the first time, the former Attorney General at the "Cour de Cassation"
denounced "business climate" and a "sense of public corruption." >>
[*15]
query: pag09 - a69viii--m.pdf
answer: pag32--a69viii-m-p+r.pdf
instead of the name of the sender: "Secretariat of the Committee of Ministers'
on the envelope below is the message:
"If undeliverable
please return to:
CC International
SPI FR167
1211 Geneve 2
Switzerland "
-------------------------------------------------------------

31

[*0016]
pag19--69viii--ti--no.pdf
[*17] word games in French, untranslatable, based on a similar pronunciation of words
"mother" (mother / madre / mama) and "bitter" (bitter / amargo / amar) in
en / es / ro;
[*18] pag11--a69viii--ue.pdf
case "f) communication-response to the petition to the Committee of Ministers (see
Appendices 69viii-m and 69viii-m-r , arrived after 8 months"
see also files pag09--a69viii-m.pdf and pag32--a69viii-m-p+r.pdf
[*19] pagX32--a69viii--ue2
.. . Theory of pillars, of which the pillar "community" and the third pillar, "of decisions"
[*20] pag33--a69viii--ue-r
[*21] pag34--a69viii--UE2-r
[*0022] pagX32--a69viii-ue2.pdf
[*0023] pag34-a69viii--UE2-r.pdf
[*24] pag13--a69viii-cm2 -- en +fr+ ru.pdf
pag15--a69viii-cm2-ru-p.pdf
pag16--a69viii--ap-ch.pdf
32

pag18--a69viii-ap-ch-ar2.pdf
[*25] pag10--a69viii--ai.pdf

AI France

[*26] pagX29--AI a72.pdf
pagX30--a72--en.pdf
[*27] pag04-a67.pdf
pag05--a69viii--e.pdf
pag06--a69viii-f-ar.pdf
[*28]
pag07 – a69ii.pdf-

Embassy of France

standard request

[*29] pag22--a69viii--scdh.pdf
pag24--a69viii-HRSC-adr.pdf
[*30] pag10-1--a69viii--ti.pdf
pag19--a69viii-ti-no--to + en + no.pdf
pag21--a69viii-ti-no-ar.pdf
pagX38--a75-TI--ro.pdf
pagX40--a75-TI--ro-tr.pdf
pagX40-back-a75 IT--ro-tr.pdf

[*0031]
pagX36--a75-IT-EA--fr + en.pdf
pagX37--a75-IT-EA--de.pdf
pag36--a75-TI-p.pdf postal return
pag37--a75-TI--EA--ret.pdf postal return
pag37-back-a75-TI--EA--ret.pdf
pag38--a75-TI--EA--ro--ret.pdf postal return
[*0032] "destinatarul nu s-a prezentat sa ridice timiterea"--in original
[*33] see APPENDIX 62--pag30--a59i + a62.pdf
see also an excerpt from Annex 62 on page 77/89 File pag08--a69vii.pdf
[*34] review "IN JUSTITIE" 15/2002--November
The antechamber ECHR Romanian land? (II) by [lawyer]. G. B.
For many Romanians for a long time, the European Court of Human Rights was the
last safeguard, the miracle at the end of the earth, where justice and truth can not be doubted,
for much less trampled. A litigant ... trying to show that Romanian officials of the European
Court of Human Rights obstruct access to files and select according to rules known only by
them.
33

On ... January 31, 2002, Mihai Moldoveanu, ... lodged a complaint with ECHR [...] has been
received, recorded under no. PP31642, Moldoveanu c / Romania [...] until September 30,
when the tone of the letter, signed by the clerk were changed radically from
perspective of the signer, clerk C. Sandru, the request is not considered
as recorded [despite] the art 47.5 of the Rules of Court. [...] But the problem remains: the
respect of an international institution [ECHR] respect that must be
restored, also for some responsible of the ECHR
[* 35]
If the note of receipt / delivery of the complaint (pag03-a55v.pdf) is not genuine- which is
probable, considering several dysfunctions of the national postal station that transmitted the
sending - then sending is not recorded at the Palace of Europe (at the ECHR) in Strasbourg
and the prosecution is in error in declining jurisdiction: "[the prosecutor] has no jurisdiction
to deal with complaints against an international court" ,and should grant a criminal complaint
of the applicant, and then ___ no ___ proof of genuine response from the "ECHR" is in the
possession of the applicant
[*36]
[Encyclopædia Universalis – extract - definition:]
Terror is a state, a exacerbated fear[...] a process of government
allowing the power to break up, because of extreme measures
and group fear, those who resist.
[Interpretation - author's note:]
-extreme measures? - Falsification, forgery etc.
-Group fear? - Fear amenable to citizen in quasi-infinite trial (about 15 years) [more to this
case, minimum 2 years for 2 litigation in two separate trials in the country of origin, including
one litigation won by the author - see chronology. pdf]
-those who resist it? - Said citizen , part in litigations between employers-parts-of-state and
employees [remember CoE is an intergovernmental organisation], employees subjects to the
(new) labor law in their country of origin.

#a.
#b.

34

#########
Annexes – list-of-files
content of «list[e].pdf »# # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #
#########
Annexes – chronology
content of «chrono[a30ii].pdf »# # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #