## Are you sure?

This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?

Apart from the states of the system, the ESO can also estimate (a) Uncertainty in the states, (b) Non-linearities in the system and (c) External disturbances. These uncertainties, non-linearities and external disturbances are treated as the total uncertainty or disturbance. Formulation 2. Consider an n-th order single-input-single-output (SISO) dynamical system represented by _____________________________(1) ________________________________________(2) Where

is the coefficient matrix of the modelled part of states, is the matrix for uncertainty in states, is the coefficient matrix for modelled part of input is the uncertainty in input, is the coefficient matrix for output, w(t) is the external disturbance.= 3. Equation (1) can be rewritten as ____________________________(3)

where 4.

is called the total disturbance. Now, define an extended state _________________________________(4)

and

__________________________________(5)

Thus equation (3) can be rewritten as ______________________(6) ___________________________________(7) where

Design of Observer 6. Condition for Observability. Let the observer be of the form

____________________(8) ________________________________(9) where L is the observer gain and _______________________________(10) Substituting equations (7) and (9) in (10) gives _________________________(11) Subtracting equation (8) from (6) and denoting __________________________(12) The observer error dynamics can be expressed as __________________(13) Using equation (11)and (12), the above equation can be rewritten as __________________(14)

For a special case of h=0, the pair is observable. Thus it can be inferred that for cases where rate of change of uncertainty asymptotically reduces to zero, the pair is always observable. We now choose the observer gain as _____________________(15) such that the observer dynamics is stable and has the desired transient behaviour. In this case, the error, eo, will go to zero asymptotically, i.e., . This will ensure that . 7. To be more specific, the generalised form of the observer can be expressed as

..........

____________________(16) ________________________________(17) where gi(e) can be a linear function or a non-linear function. In case gi(e)is a linear function then it is equated to e itself. In case gi(e)is chosen to be non linear function, it has been selected heuristically based on experimental results as

_________(18) Note:- In case of only one output,

and

. Similarly,

and

.

Design of Control Law 8. Condition for Controllability. The controller to be designed is taken as a pole-placement controller of the form ______________________________(19) where . Substituting for u in equation (6) gives __________________(20)

__________________(21) For special case of h=0, the pair is controllable. Thus for all cases of h

reasonably small, the pair is always controllable and the above poleplacement controller with gains K can be used in the feedback loop to achieve a desired stable transient behaviour. 9. Observer-Controller Structure. In order to use the ESO estimated states in the controller the choice of u is made as ______________________________(22) where the controller gains, K, are designed using pole-placement as ________________________(23) 10. Corollary. Consider a second order pole placement problem were the poles have to be placed as per the characteristic equation ____________________________(23) ______________________(24) Equation (22) can be represented in the form of the coefficient matrix given by ________________(25) For pole-placement, the controller gains have to be chosen such that __________________________(26) where

or _________________________(27) Thus, the control law given by equation (22) can be rewritten as ____________________(28) 11. In case of a tracking problem (regulator), the control law can be written as ______________(29) where Conclusion are the desired values of x.

12. This Extended State Observer has been found to be more robust and superior in performance in comparison to other observers like high gain observer, and sliding mode observer.[2].

[1] S.E. Talole and S.B. Phadke, ”Robust Missile Autopilot Design using Extended State Observer”, in Proc. International Conference on Avionics Systems,(RCI, Hyderabad, India),pp.68-74, Feb 2008. [2]W. Wang and Z. Gao, “A comparison study of advanced state observer design techniques,” in Proc. of the American Control Conference, (Denver, Colarado, USA), pp. 4754–4759, June 2003.

- From PID to Active Disturbance Rejection Control
- Feedback Control Schemes
- Nonlinear Tracking Differentiator for Velocity Estimation from Shaft Encoder
- Missile Roll Autopilot Overview
- Sliding Mode Control of Electric Drives
- Transfer Function Form of Roll Dynamics
- Missile Roll Control Part II
- MATLAB SIMULATIONS FOR GARNELL's ROLL AUTOPILOT
- Missile Autopilot Math Modeling
- Uncertainty and Disturbance Observer
- Missile Roll Control-High Frequency Model
- Missile Roll Control Part IV -Modern Control Approach
- Proportional Navigation
- Transfer Function Models Representing the Dynamics of a Missile
- Active Disturbance Rejection Control
- Missile Autopilot
- L1 Adaptive Control Theory Guaranteed Robustness With Fast Adaptation (Advances in Design and Control)
- Advances in Dynamics and Control
- Notes on Linearisation(H.K.Khalil)
- Garnell- Autopilot Design
- Tactical Missile Design Presentation Fleeman
- Class 39 - 41 Introduction to Missile Dynamics
- Tactical Missile Autopilot Design
- Sliding Mode Control Tutorials-17 Ctd
- Lateral Autopilot Notes
- Missile Control Part I
- Missile control
- Missile System Design
- Classical Missile Autopilot Design
- MATLAB SIMULATIONS FOR GARNELL's PITCH AUTOPILOT

Skip carousel

- null
- Centurion Industries, Inc. And Eric F. Burtis v. Warren Steurer and Associates and Instructional Materials and Equipment Distributors, Cybernetic Systems, Inc., a New Mexico Corporation, Deponent-Appellant, 665 F.2d 323, 10th Cir. (1981)
- tmp9AC7
- Disabled People With Neuro Sky Mind Wave In Brain Computer Interface
- null
- null
- Employee Attendance Monitoring using Video Streaming Face Recognition
- null
- Image Processing Techniques For Quality Checking In Food Industry
- null
- Comparison of Fuzzy C-Means and Hierarchical Agglomerative Clustering Algorithms for Data Mining
- AUTONOMOUS SURFACE CLEANING ROBOT EAMBEDED WITH AT89S52

- Notes on Linearisation(H.K.Khalil)
- Questions and Answers in Thermodynamics
- Proportional Navigation Guidance (cite:John H Blakelock)
- Differential Geometry based Control Theory
- Sliding Mode Control Survey 23 Jun 12
- Missile Roll Control Part II
- Questions and Answers in Aerodynamics
- Missile Roll Control-High Frequency Model
- Notes on Linear Multivariable Control Theory
- Missile Control Part I
- Missile Roll Control Part IV -Modern Control Approach
- Transfer Function Models Representing the Dynamics of a Missile
- Matrices and Linear Algebra in Control Applications
- Missile Autopilot
- Proportional Navigation based on Tactical Msl Guidance by Zarchan
- Matlab Simulations for Basic Proportional Navigation
- Introduction to Basics of Missile Guidance using Proportional Navigation
- Transfer Function Form of Roll Dynamics
- Tactical Missile Autopilot Design
- MATLAB SIMULATIONS FOR GARNELL's ROLL AUTOPILOT
- Missile Autopilot Math Modeling
- Chattering in Sliding Mode Control and its Reduction - An Overview of Methods
- Lateral Autopilot Notes
- Scanning Systems
- Proportional Navigation
- Missile System Design
- MATLAB SIMULATIONS FOR GARNELL's PITCH AUTOPILOT

Sign up to vote on this title

UsefulNot usefulClose Dialog## Are you sure?

This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?

Close Dialog## This title now requires a credit

Use one of your book credits to continue reading from where you left off, or restart the preview.

Loading