92 views

Uploaded by Mahesh Abnave

Properties of matrix determinant explained.

- Theory of Robust Control (Carsten Scherer)
- New method to calculate determinants of n x n(n geq 3) matrix, by reducing determinants to 2nd order
- MATLAB
- Basic Matrix Concepts - Devdas Menon
- linear algebra
- NRK ParaSol
- TCS Reasoning
- 2007 Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition (Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics,2007,0898716268)
- Mathematical Symbols
- Maths
- Maths_SQP.pdf
- MATH1310 EngMath1 Sem1!15!16
- Programm Code for Final Exam
- Manavazhaganr@Bsnl.in
- notes of algebra
- matrix inverse.
- Lesson 2
- jozette roberts unit plan on matrices portfolio
- mmex1
- Determinants of 4x4 Matrices

You are on page 1of 12

17

By the end of this section you will be able to

prove that the determinant of a triangular or diagonal matrix is the product of the

leading diagonal entries

evaluate determinants of a triangular and diagonal matrix

prove properties of determinant of an elementary matrix

establish certain properties of determinants of other matrices

You will need to remember the definition of a determinant of a matrix and the

technique to evaluate it by using cofactors. This section is a difficult section to follow

because we need to prove a number of propositions and some of these rely on the

results of chapter 1.

B1 Revision of Properties of a Determinant

In the last section we established certain properties of the determinant of a matrix such

as:

Proposition (2.10). If a square n by n matrix A consists of two identical rows then

det ( A ) = 0 .

Further properties were also established in the associated Exercise 2(a) and we give

these reference numbers.

Proposition (2.14). Let A be a square matrix then det ( AT ) = det ( A ) . What does this

mean?

The determinant of the transposed matrix is the same as the determinant of the initial

matrix.

Proposition (2.15). Let B be a matrix obtained from matrix A by multiplying one row

(or column) of A by a non-zero scalar k then

det ( B ) = k det ( A )

Proposition (2.16). Let A be a square n by n matrix and k be a scalar then

det ( kA ) = k n det ( A )

What does this mean?

The determinant of the scalar multiplication kA is k n times the determinant of the

matrix A.

Note that since det ( AT ) = det ( A ) , expanding along a row or column is equivalent.

Generally propositions about the determinant of the matrix with the word row can be

swapped by the word column because det ( AT ) = det ( A ) .

B2 Determinant Properties of Particular Matrices

We can find determinants of particular matrices such as triangular matrices. What are

triangular matrices?

Definition (2.17). A triangular matrix is a n by n matrix where all entries to one side of

the leading diagonal are zero.

What is meant by the leading diagonal?

Leading diagonal of a matrix is the entries going from the top left hand corner to the

bottom right hand corner of the matrix,

For example, the following are triangular matrices:

Chapter 2: Determinants

18

1 2 3

1 0 0

Leading

Diagonal

(a) 0 4 5 and (b) 2 3 0

0 0 6

4 5 6

(b) is an example of a lower triangular matrix.

Another type of matrix is a diagonal matrix. Do you know what is meant by a diagonal

matrix?

Definition (2.18). A diagonal matrix is a n by n matrix where all entries to both sides of

the leading diagonal are zero.

Can you think of an example of a diagonal matrix?

1 0 0

1 0 0

0 0 1

0 0 3

Triangular and diagonal matrices have the following property.

Proposition (2.19). The determinant of a triangular or diagonal matrix is a product of

the entries along the leading diagonal.

What does this proposition mean?

Let A be an upper triangle matrix such that

a11 a12 " a1n

0 a22 " a2 n

A=

# " % #

0 " ann

0

then det ( A ) = a11a22 a33 " ann .

We prove it for the upper triangular matrix and the proof for the lower triangular matrix

is similar. Since the diagonal matrix is a particular upper (or lower) triangular matrix

therefore the proof of the diagonal matrix follows from the upper triangular result.

We use proof by induction. Remember the method of proof by induction is threefold.

1. Prove it for a base n = 1 or n = 2 (or for some other base n = k0 ).

2. Assume it is true for n = k .

3. Prove it for n = k + 1 .

Proof.

For a 2 by 2 matrix we have

a

a

det 11 12 = a11a22 0 = a11a22

0 a22

Hence the determinant of a 2 by 2 upper triangular matrix is the product of entries in

the leading diagonal. Therefore the result is true for n = 2 .

Assume it is true for n = k , that is

a11 a12 " a1k

0 a22 " a2 k

()

= a a a " akk

det

# " % # 11 22 33

0 " akk

0

Chapter 2: Determinants

19

n = k + 1 we can find the determinant by expanding along the bottom row because all

entries in the bottom row are zero apart from a( k +1)( k +1) :

a11

0

det

#

0

a1( k +1)

a11 a12 " a1k

0 a22 " a2 k

( k +1) + ( k +1)

= ( 1)

# " % #

" %

#

0

0 " akk

0 " a( k +1)( k +1)

a12 "

= a11a22 a33"akk by ()

= ( 1)

2k +2

Remember ( 1)

2k +2

= ( 1)

2( k +1)

product of the entries in the leading diagonal. We have proven the case for n = k + 1 .

Therefore by induction we have shown that the determinant of an upper triangular

matrix is the product of the entries along the leading diagonal.

Example 10

Find the determinants of the following matrices:

1

0

(a) U =

0

2

5

0

0

3 4

0

1

6 7

3 2

(b) L =

11 8

8 9

0 10

89 9

0

0

5

3

0

0

2 0

0 6

(c) D = 0 0

0 0

0 0

0

0

4

0

0

0 0

0 0

0 0

3 0

0 10

Solution

We use the result of the above Proposition (2.19) because all 3 matrices are upper

triangular, lower triangular and diagonal respectively.

In each case the determinant is the product of the leading diagonal entries.

(a) det ( U ) = 1 5 8 10 = 400

(b) det ( L ) = 1 ( 2 ) 5 2 = 20

(c) det ( D ) = 2 ( 6 ) 4 3 10 = 1440

You may like to check these answers by using MATLAB. The MATLAB command for

determinant is det().

B3 Determinant Properties of Elementary Matrices

Do you remember what an elementary matrix is?

An elementary matrix is a matrix obtained by a single row operation on the identity

matrix I. Examples of 3 by 3 elementary matrices are

1 0 0 0 0 1

1 0 5

0 5 0 , 0 1 0 and 0 1 0

0 0 1 1 0 0

0 0 1

Chapter 2: Determinants

20

row by a non-zero scalar k .

2. An elementary matrix E obtained from the identity matrix, I, by adding (or

subtracting) one row to another.

3. An elementary matrix E obtained from the identity matrix, I, by interchanging

two rows (or columns).

We can evaluate the determinant of these three different elementary matrices by using

the following proposition.

Proposition (2.20). Let E be an elementary matrix.

(a) If the elementary matrix E is obtained from the identity matrix I by multiplying a

row by a non-zero scalar k then det ( E ) = k .

(b) If the elementary matrix E is obtained from the identity matrix I by adding (or

subtracting) a multiple of one row to another then det ( E ) = 1 .

(c) If the elementary matrix E is obtained from the identity matrix I by interchanging

two rows (or columns) then det ( E ) = 1 .

Proof.

(a) Remember the determinant of the identity is 1 therefore by the above Proposition

(2.15) with one row of the identity multiplied by non-zero k we have

det ( E ) = k det ( I ) = k 1 = k

(b) Remember the identity matrix is a diagonal matrix. If we add a multiple of one row

of the identity matrix to another then we have a triangular matrix and by the above

proposition (2.19) the determinant of a triangular matrix is the product of the elements

along the main diagonal, which is 111" 1 = 1 . Hence det ( E ) = 1 .

(c) We have to prove it for the case when two rows have been interchanged. This is a

more complex proof and is by induction.

We first prove the result for n = 2 :

Rows of I 2 have

0 1

det ( E ) = det

been interchanged

1 0

= 0 1 = 1

Hence if we interchange the two rows of the 2 by 2 identity matrix then the determinant

is 1 .

Assume the result is true for n = k , that is k by k elementary matrix E k with rows i

matrix with rows i and j of the identity matrix interchanged.

1 0 " " " " 0

ith row

# % # # # # #

0 " 0 " 1 0 #

Ek +1 = # # 0 1 0 # #

jth row

0 " 1 0 0 # #

# # # # # 1 #

0 0 " " " " 1

21

Chapter 2: Determinants

To find the determinant of this matrix we can expand along the kth row where kth row

is not one of ith or jth row. Note that in the kth row all the entries should be zeros apart

from the diagonal element ekk which is equal to 1. Therefore the determinant of this

matrix Ek +1 is

det ( Ek +1 ) = ( 1)

k +k

det ( Ek )

(*)

Why?

Because if you delete the elements containing the row and column containing the entry

ekk then the remaining matrix is the k by k elementary matrix with rows i and j

interchanged, which is Ek . What is the determinant of Ek ?

By our induction hypothesis we have det ( Ek ) = 1 . Substituting this into (*) gives

det ( Ek +1 ) = ( 1)

( 1)

2k

= ( 1) ( 1) = 1

k +k

Because ( 1)2 k = 1

k + 1 which has two rows interchanged is 1 .

Therefore by induction we have our result that if the elementary matrix E is obtained

from the identity matrix I by swapping two rows (or columns) then det ( E ) = 1 .

Note that we can use this Proposition (2.20) to find the determinants of elementary

matrices. Summarizing this Proposition (2.20) we have that the determinant of an

elementary matrix E is given by

1 if a multiple of one row is added to another

(2.21)

det ( E ) = 1 if two rows have been interchanged

k if a row has been multiplied by non-zero k

Example 11

Find the determinants of the following elementary matrices:

1 0 0

0 0 1

1 0 5

(a) A = 0 5 0

(b) B = 0 1 0

(c) C = 0 1 0

0 0 1

1 0 0

0 0 1

Solution

Each of these is an elementary matrix so we can use the above Result (2.21).

(a) Since this A is the elementary matrix obtained from the identity matrix by

multiplying the middle row by 5 we have, by Result (2.21) with k = 5 ,

det ( A ) = 5

(b) How is matrix B obtained from the identity matrix?

By interchanging top and bottom rows, therefore by the middle line of (2.21) we have

det ( B ) = 1

(c) How is matrix C obtained from the identity matrix?

By subtracting 5 times the bottom row from the top row. Hence by the top line of

Result (2.21) we have

det ( C ) = 1

22

Chapter 2: Determinants

We can extend Proposition (2.20) or result (2.21) to any square matrix A as the

following proposition states.

Proposition (2.22). Let B be a matrix obtained from the matrix A by

(a)

multiplying a row (or column) by a non-zero scalar k. In this case

det ( B ) = k det ( A ) .

(b)

adding (or subtracting) a multiple of one row to another. In this case

det ( B ) = det ( A ) .

(c)

Proof.

Part (a) was proven in Exercise 2(a) and is really Proposition (2.11) stated earlier in this

section. See Exercise 2(b) for proofs of parts (b) and (c).

We can summarize this into the following result.

det ( A ) if a multiple of one row is added to another

(2.23)

det ( B ) = det ( A ) if two rows have been interchanged

In the next example we apply this result (2.23) to find the determinant of a matrix

which has fractional entries.

Example 12

Find the determinant of the following matrix:

2

1

1

23 23

1

1

5

A=

2

6

6

3

1

1

11

11

11

Solution

How can we find the determinant of this matrix?

We can find the determinant of another matrix which is matrix A with top row

multiplied by 23, second row multiplied by 6 and bottom row multiplied by 11.

How is the determinant of this new matrix, call it B say, related to the determinant of

matrix A?

23

1 2

()

( 23 6 11) det ( A ) = det ( B ) = det 3 1 5

1 3 1

1 2 23

1 5

3 5

3 1

det ( B ) = det 3 1

5 = det

( 2 ) det

+ 23det

3 1

1 1

1 3

1 3 1

= ( 1 15 ) + 2 ( 3 5 ) + 23 ( 9 1)

= 16 16 + 23 ( 8 ) = 152

23

Chapter 2: Determinants

det ( A ) =

Hence det ( A ) =

152

152

76

=

=

( 23 6 11) 1518 759

76

.

759

For larger size matrices it is normally easier to convert these into triangular matrices by

applying row operations. Why carry out this conversion?

Because the determinant of a triangular matrix is just the product of the entries on the

leading diagonal. The following two examples shows how we use this approach.

Example 13

Find the determinant of the following matrix by using row operations:

1 2 2 4

7 8 3 0

A=

3 2 0 0

1 0 0 0

Solution

Can we convert this into a triangular matrix?

Yes by using row operations. Note that the given matrix A is not a triangular matrix

because both sides of the leading diagonal contain non-zero entries. You will need to

recall your work from chapter 1 on row operations. How can we convert the matrix A

into a triangular matrix?

First we label the rows of matrix A and then we apply row operations:

R1 1 2 2 4

R2 7 8 3 0

R3 3 2 0 0

R4 1 0 0 0

Interchanging rows R1 and R4 , R2 and R3 we have

R4 1 0 0 0

R3 3 2 0 0

R2 7 8 3 0

R1 1 2 2 4

What is the determinant of this matrix?

We have a lower triangular matrix so the determinant is the product of the entries on

the leading diagonal, that is 1 2 3 4 = 24 . What is the determinant of the given

matrix A?

The bottom matrix is obtained from matrix A by interchanging rows R1 and R4 , R2

and R3 . How does interchanging rows affect the determinant of the matrix?

By (2.23) interchanging rows multiplies the determinant by 1 . Since we have two

interchanges therefore the determinant of the matrix A is given by

( 1)( 1) det ( A ) = 24 which gives det ( A ) = 24

(2.23)

det ( B ) = det ( A )

Chapter 2: Determinants

24

Example 14

Find the determinant of the following matrix:

5 1 1 1 1

1 5 1 1 1

A = 5 1 5 1 1

1 5 1 5 1

5 1 5 1 5

Solution

Labelling the rows of this matrix we have

R1 5 1 1 1 1

R2 1 5 1 1 1

R3 5 1 5 1 1

R4 1 5 1 5 1

R5 5 1 5 1 5

Executing the following row operations:

R1

5 1 1 1 1

R2 * = R2 R1 4 4 0 0 0

R3 * = R3 R1 0 0 4 0 0

R4 * = R4 R2 0 0 0 4 0

R5 * = R5 R3 0 0 0 0 4

Carrying out the row operation 5 R2 * gives

R1

5 1 1 1 1

R2 ** = 5R2 * 20 20 0 0 0

0 0 4 0 0

R3 *

R4 *

0 0 0 4 0

0 0 0 0 4

R5 *

R1

5 1 1 1 1

R2 *** = R2 ** + 4 R1 0 24 4 4 4

0 0 4 0 0

R3 *

R4 *

0 0 0 4 0

0 0 0 0 4

R5 *

We have an upper triangular matrix so the determinant is the product of all the entries

on the leading diagonal, that is 5 24 4 4 4 = 7680 . What is the determinant of the

given matrix A?

All the above row operations apart from 5R2 * makes no difference to the determinant.

Why not?

Because by result (2.23) adding a multiple of one row to another has the same

determinant. How does the row operation 5R2 * change the determinant?

(2.23)

det ( B ) = det ( A )

Chapter 2: Determinants

25

5det ( A ) = 7680 which gives det ( A ) =

7680

= 1536

5

Proposition (2.24). Let E be an elementary matrix. For any square matrix A of the same

size as E we have

det ( EA ) = det ( E ) det ( A )

Means the determinant of matrix multiplication EA is equal to the determinant of the

elementary matrix E times the determinant of matrix A.

Proof.

We consider the three different cases of elementary matrices separately.

Case 1. Let E be the elementary matrix obtained from the identity matrix by adding a

multiple of one row to another. Then from Chapter 1 we have that the matrix

multiplication EA performs the same row operation of adding one row to another of

matrix A. By the first line of Result (2.23) we have

det ( EA ) = det ( A )

By result (2.21) we have det ( E ) = 1 therefore

det ( EA ) = det ( A )

= 1 det ( A ) = det ( E ) det ( A )

Hence for the first case we have det ( EA ) = det ( E ) det ( A ) .

Case 2. Let E be the elementary matrix obtained from the identity matrix by

multiplying a row (or column) by a non-zero scalar k. By result (2.21) we have

det ( E ) = k . The matrix multiplication EA performs the same row operation of

multiplying a row by a non-zero scalar k on matrix A. By result (2.23) we have

det ( EA ) = k det ( A ) .

det ( EA ) = kN det ( A ) = det ( E ) det ( A )

= det ( E )

Case 3. See Exercise 2(b).

Proposition (2.25). Let E1 , E2 , E3 , " and Ek be elementary matrices and B be a

square matrix of the same size. Then

det ( E1E2 E3 " Ek B ) = det ( E1 ) det ( E2 ) det ( E3 )" det ( Ek ) det ( B )

What does this proposition mean?

Means if we have a matrix multiplication E1E 2 E3 " Ek B then the determinant of this is

equal to determinant of each matrix multiplied together.

Proof.

Exercise 2(b).

(2.23)

Chapter 2: Determinants

26

Theorem (2.26). A square matrix A is invertible (non-singular) if and only if

det ( A ) 0

What does this proposition mean?

Means if matrix A is invertible then the determinant of A does not equal zero. Also if

the determinant is not equal to zero then the matrix A is invertible (non-singular).

How do we prove this result?

Since it is an if and only if statement, we need to prove it both ways. That is we first

assume matrix A is invertible and show that this leads to det ( A ) 0 . This direction is

invertible. This direction is normally symbolized by .

Proof.

( ). Assume the matrix A is invertible. By Proposition (1.27) part d) of chapter 1 we

know the matrix A is a product of elementary matrices. We can write the matrix A as

A = E1E2 E3 " E k

where E1 , E2 , E3 , " and Ek are elementary matrices. By Proposition (2.25) we

have

det ( A ) = det ( E1E2 E3 " E k )

= det ( E1 ) det ( E2 ) det ( E3 )" det ( Ek )

Remember

(2.21)

det ( E ) = 1

k

if two rows have been interchanged

if a row has been multiplied by non-zero k

Multiplying these non-zero numbers, det ( E1 ) det ( E2 ) det ( E3 )" det ( Ek ) , cannot give

0. Therefore det ( A ) 0 .

Now we go the other way ( ). Assume det ( A ) 0 then by Proposition (2.13) we

1

adj ( A ) which means that matrix A is invertible (non-singular).

det ( A )

Hence we have proven our result.

have A 1 =

We can extend Proposition (2.24) to any two square matrices of the same size as the

next proposition states.

Proposition (2.27). If A and B are square matrices of the same size then

det ( AB ) = det ( A ) det ( B )

Proof.

We consider the two cases of matrix A. Case 1 is where the matrix A is invertible (nonsingular) and case 2 is where matrix A is non-invertible (singular).

Case 1. Assume the matrix A is invertible. Then by Proposition (1.27) part d) of chapter

1 we know matrix A is a product of elementary matrices. We can write

A = E1E2 E3 " E k

(1.27) Part (d) A is invertible A is a product of elementary matrices

Chapter 2: Determinants

27

det ( AB ) = det ( E1E 2 E3 " Ek B )

[ By (2.25)]

=A

= det ( A ) det ( B )

Case 2. Assume matrix A is non-invertible (singular). By the above Proposition (2.26)

we conclude that det ( A ) = 0 . Since matrix A is non-invertible therefore matrix

Suppose AB is invertible then by Proposition (1.20) of the last chapter we have matrix

A (and B) is invertible. Since AB is also non-invertible therefore det ( AB ) = 0 . Hence

we have our result

Again we can extend the result of Proposition (2.27) to n square matrices as the next

proposition states.

Proposition (2.28). If A1 , A 2 , A 3 , " and A n are square matrices of the same size

then

det ( A1A 2 A 3 " A n ) = det ( A1 ) det ( A 2 ) det ( A 3 )" det ( A n )

Proof.

Exercise 2(b).

Generally a function in mathematics which has these properties of Proposition (2.27) or

(2.28) is called a multiplicative function.

Generally in mathematics we say a function f is multiplicative if

f ( xy ) = f ( x ) f ( y )

The determinant is an example of a multiplicative function.

Proposition (2.29). If A is an invertible (non-singular) matrix then

1

det ( A 1 ) =

det ( A )

Proof. Exercise 2(b)

(1.20)

(2.25)

(2.26)

( AB ) = B 1A 1

det ( E1E2 E3 " Ek B ) = det ( E1 ) det ( E2 ) det ( E3 )" det ( Ek ) det ( B )

A square matrix A is invertible (non-singular) if and only if det ( A ) 0

1

Chapter 2: Determinants

28

SUMMARY

A triangular matrix is a square matrix where all entries to one side of the leading

diagonal are zero.

A diagonal matrix is a square matrix where all entries to both sides of the leading

diagonal are zero.

The determinant of a triangular or diagonal matrix is a product of the entries along the

leading diagonal.

det ( A ) if a multiple of one row is added to another

(2.23)

det ( B ) = det ( A ) if two rows have been interchanged

A square matrix A is invertible if and only if the determinant of A does not equal to

zero.

If A and B are square matrices of the same size then

det ( AB ) = det ( A ) det ( B )

- Theory of Robust Control (Carsten Scherer)Uploaded byErsin Erol
- New method to calculate determinants of n x n(n geq 3) matrix, by reducing determinants to 2nd orderUploaded byArmend Salihu
- MATLABUploaded byLavinia Ioana
- Basic Matrix Concepts - Devdas MenonUploaded bynatalia
- linear algebraUploaded byUday Kumar Mulaka
- NRK ParaSolUploaded byLuis Arreguin
- TCS ReasoningUploaded byapi-3818780
- 2007 Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition (Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics,2007,0898716268)Uploaded byChemick Edogawa
- Mathematical SymbolsUploaded byDo Minh Nam
- MathsUploaded byShaik Adi
- Maths_SQP.pdfUploaded byNirvana Adithya Visiobibliophobiatic Guy
- MATH1310 EngMath1 Sem1!15!16Uploaded byAzrin Saedi
- Programm Code for Final ExamUploaded byAsadul Hoque
- notes of algebraUploaded bySherif El-soudy
- matrix inverse.Uploaded byps3266_753186479
- Lesson 2Uploaded byAnushka Kuruwita
- Manavazhaganr@Bsnl.inUploaded byManavazhagan
- jozette roberts unit plan on matrices portfolioUploaded byapi-403984108
- mmex1Uploaded byDaniel Espinal
- Determinants of 4x4 MatricesUploaded bykellyting90
- kokenIJCMS33-36-2008Uploaded bydurdaneibrahim
- HW #2Uploaded bysshanbhag
- D034017022.pdfUploaded bymario olivares
- Chapter 1Uploaded byMaloem Sinaga
- llUploaded byAkshay Kurli
- Lecture3_D2.pdfUploaded byParitosh Gupta
- Clicker Quiz 04sle UsfUploaded byAnonymous WjGf1l
- 2.4 Matrices & DeterminantUploaded byAmana IB
- ACD CAL 2018-19 After Senate Approval 27122017 (2)Uploaded byvishal9119
- Matlab Lecture 2Uploaded byGovind Samy

- Discrete Fourier TransformUploaded byMahesh Abnave
- PCI ExpressUploaded byMahesh Abnave
- Git CommandsUploaded byMahesh Abnave
- Game API.docxUploaded byMahesh Abnave
- Chipset ArchitectureUploaded byMahesh Abnave
- Chapter 04 Image e Nhanc SpatUploaded byMahesh Abnave
- Different types of operating systemsUploaded byMahesh Abnave
- Vector SpacesUploaded byMahesh Abnave
- Expansion SlotsUploaded byMahesh Abnave
- Multi Sever Queue PrintoutUploaded byMahesh Abnave
- Wireless LAN BasicsUploaded byMahesh Abnave
- Functional Dependencies & NormalisationUploaded byMahesh Abnave
- DSIP Case StudiesUploaded byMahesh Abnave
- Digital Image ProcessingUploaded byMahesh Abnave
- Lcm & Clcm PrintoutUploaded byMahesh Abnave
- Inventory SystemUploaded byMahesh Abnave
- Discrete Image ProcessingUploaded byMahesh Abnave
- Clocked Synchronous State MachinesUploaded byMahesh Abnave
- Datastructures ProgramsUploaded byMahesh Abnave
- Operational AmplifierUploaded byMahesh Abnave
- Operational Amplifier Basics by Harry LythallUploaded byMahesh Abnave
- NormalisationUploaded byMahesh Abnave
- 945G Chipeset detailsUploaded byMahesh Abnave
- 915G Chipset detailsUploaded byMahesh Abnave
- Read and Write Heads and Head Actuator Mechanisms of Hard disksUploaded byMahesh Abnave
- 04 04 Intuition for Regularization 06-59Uploaded byMahesh Abnave
- 04 04 Data Dimensions 3-08Uploaded byMahesh Abnave
- Turing Encoding(ITCS 7)Uploaded byMahesh Abnave
- Anand Presentation150813-03 ConvertedUploaded byMahesh Abnave

- ProblemsUploaded byAmit Chandak
- Fem ModelingUploaded byolarewaju Animasahun
- Types of GraphsUploaded byapit94
- Partial differential solution with MatlabUploaded byDaniel Casas-Orozco
- Homework151aMain.pdfUploaded byAhmad Imran Rafique
- Applications in Ch4Uploaded bykalite123
- 7. Powers and Roots of Complex Numbers - DeMoivre's Theorem.pdfUploaded byxhaikh21
- Acitivity #2Uploaded byStephanie Chen
- Lab ExerciseUploaded byKaye Nicolas
- Exercicios Calculo VetorialUploaded byffppxxzz
- Stochastic Models Estimation and ControlUploaded byShahryar Bagheri
- Empirical formulas (1917)Uploaded byMarcelo Silvano de Camargo
- 025Uploaded byFahad Almafakir
- The mortar method with approximate integrationUploaded byslirpa
- 3.1 Exponential FUnctions++Uploaded byBigbrain Bigbrain
- An Optimization Model for the Design of Network Arch BridgesUploaded byAshutoshAparaj
- Electronic CompanionUploaded byanonymous author
- Matlab ProgramsUploaded bysameer shaikh
- Unit 4Uploaded byVenki Mvs
- m3 regular jntu question papers 2008Uploaded byanjaneyulud
- s-aesUploaded bysrisairampoly
- Graphing Parabolas With Excel v2Uploaded byFlávio Roberto Borges Lima
- analqs_ch2Uploaded byJuan Torre Miguel
- Fluent Tutorials Cornell UniversityUploaded byjasimned
- [Ian_Grojnowski,_notes_taken_by_Elena_Yudovina]_In(BookZZ.org).pdfUploaded byLazar Radicevic
- Module 13 - Differential Equations 3 (self study)Uploaded byapi-3827096
- Breck_2009Uploaded byVanidevi Mani
- Mathematical Analysis of an Iterative Algorithm for Low-Density Code DecodingUploaded byvmaiz
- Piecewise Silence in Discrete Cosmological Models Timothy Clifton 1 , Daniele Gregoris 2,3,4 , and Kjell Rosquist 2,5 1 School of Physics and Astronomy, Queen Mary University of London, UK. Department of Physics, Stockholm University, 106 91 Stockholm, Sweden. 3 Max-Planck-Institut f ̈ ur Gravitationsphysik (Albert-Einstein-Institut), Am M ̈ uhlenberg 1, 14476 Potsdam, Germany. 4 Erasmus Mundus Joint Doctorate IRAP Ph.D. Student. 5 ICRANet, Piazza della Repubblica, 10, I-65122 Pescara, Italy.Uploaded bymarkrichardmurad
- Tutorial 1Uploaded byMOMEN ELSIR