Vendor Evaluation for Purchasing

Define the weighting keys in SM30 - V_T147J.
Weighting keys 01 and 02 are defined in the standard system. You combine the
weighting shares for the standard main criteria:
Main criterion
Key 01 Key 02
Gen. service/support 1
Ext. service provision 1
Define the criteria in SM30 - V_T147G - Double click on the line items
In this step, you define the criteria by which the system computes scores for vendors
specify whether the scores for the subcriteria are computed manually, semiautomatically, or
You can also store your own methods of computation for the scores for subcriteria in
form of user exits. The enhancement MM06L001 is available for this purpose.
Define the scope of list in SM30 - V_T147M - Double click on the line items
Define Purchasing Organization data for vendor evaluations in transaction OMGL.
An example :How the system calculates the score for the automatic subcriteria
"On-Time Delivery Performance"?
The system uses the statistics-relevant delivery date in the purchase order
(Items -> Delivery Schedule) and the goods receipt date to calculate date
You use the statistics-relevant delivery date, for example, if you know that the
will not deliver the material as scheduled on September 15 but on September 30.
Enter the
delivery date as September 30, but enter the statistics-relevant delivery date as
September 15.
In calculating the score for on-time delivery performance, the system will then not
the actual delivery date, but the statistics-relevant delivery date. This has a negative
effect on the score for this goods receipt.
However, materials planning and control uses the realistic delivery date (September

these are the movement types 101 and 105. parameter had the value 60. The goods receipt took place on Nov.del. There is thus a difference of 12 days. this results in a relatively low percentage variance: The Std. and via the order date and the . del. parameter has the value 20. the system calculates the delivery time variance via the firm zone in the case of scheduling agreements. but only 55% of the ordered quantity. but did not deliver the required quantity.OMGL in the On-time delivery section To rate delivery date variances in days. Although the goods receipt is punctual. 15.del. On-time delivery performance is thus always to be seen in conjunction with quantity reliability. The system considers only goods receipts against purchase orders and scheduling agreements into stores and the release of GR blocked stock into stores. maintain the Std.OMGL in the On-time delivery section If you do not want a vendor to receive a very good score if he delivered the goods on time. 27. If you assign a lower standard value. this means that relatively low date variances produce high percentage variances.time var. The system calculates the percentage variance as follows: 12 / 20 x 100 = 60 If the Std. the statistical delivery date was Nov. parameter.time var.time var. it is not included in the calculation of the vendor’s score for on-time delivery performance.which the vendor will actually adhere to. perc. If you set a higher standard value. So that the non-scoring of the on-time delivery performance criterion in this case does not bring an unfair advantage in comparison with a poor score. If you do not maintain this parameter. In the standard system. the vendor is awarded a low score for quantity reliability. Minimum Delivery Percentage . parameter to 60% and the vendor delivers the goods on time. you can maintain a minimum delivery percentage in Customizing. Assume you set the Min. Standardizing Delivery Date Variance . the variance would be 20% (12 / 60 x 100 = 20).del.

ABAP Programming and Other IMG Stuf http://www. Best regards.statistics-relevant delivery date in the case of purchase orders. SAP .