beta

© All Rights Reserved

22 views

beta

© All Rights Reserved

- Multifactor Model Case
- Assignment
- Chapter 7—Risk, Return, and the Capital Asset Pricing Model
- Case 2 - AES - Questions(1)
- UT Dallas Syllabus for ba4346.001.07s taught by Valery Polkovnichenko (vxp065000)
- Valuations 1
- Return Risk and Sml
- Capital Asset Pricing Model
- Fernadez (2007) - 110 Common Errors in Company Valuations
- Calculating Beta Excel
- IRJFE4 7 grigoris
- Value Review
- Index and Risk
- Performance Evaluation Using Conditional Alphas and Betas
- Treynor Ratio
- Warner Chilcott (WCRX,$WCRX) In Play? Company up 40% Since Inclusion in VE Forecast 16 Portfolio
- Arbitrage Pricing Theory
- Risk and the cost of capital
- day trader - aim 20130409
- day trader - aim 20130923

You are on page 1of 7

The Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) is one method of determining a cost of equity based on the risks faced by

shareholders. As such it can be viewed as part of a wider discussion looking at cost of capital.

Introduction - risk and return

Equity shareholders are paid only after all other commitments have been met. They are the last investors to be paid

out of company profits.

The same pattern of payment also occurs on the winding up of a company. The order of priority is:

secured lenders

legally-protected creditors such as tax authorities

unsecured creditors

preference shareholders

ordinary shareholders.

As their earnings also fluctuate, equity shareholders therefore face the greatest risk of all investors. Since ordinary

shares are the most risky investments the company offer, they are also the most expensive form of finance for the

company.

The level of risk faced by the equity investor depends on:

extent of other binding financial commitments.

Given the link to the volatility of company earnings, it is these investors that will face more risk if the company was to

embark on riskier projects.

If we want to assess the impact of any potential increase (or decrease) in risk on our estimate of the cost of finance,

we must focus on the impact on the cost of equity.

The return required by equity investors can be shown as

An investor, knowing that a particular investment was risky, could decide to reduce the overall risk faced, by acquiring

a second share with a different risk profile and so obtain a smoother average return.

Reducing the risk in this way is known as diversification.

In the diagram above, the investor has combined investment A (for example shares in a company making

sunglasses) with investment B,(perhaps shares in a company making raincoats). The fortunes of both firms are

affected by the weather, but whilst A benefits from the sunshine, B loses out and vice versa for the rain. Our investor

has therefore smoother overall returns - i.e. faces less overall volatility / risk and will need a lower overall return.

The returns from the investments shown are negatively correlated - that is they move in opposite directions. In fact

they appear to have close to perfect negative correlation - any increase in one is almost exactly matched by a

decrease the other.

The diagram above is an exaggeration, as it is unlikely that the returns of any two businesses would move in such

opposing directions,but the principle of an investor diversifying a portfolio of holdings to reduce the risk faced is a

good one.

However an investor can reduce risk by diversifying to hold a portfolio of shareholdings, since shares in different

industries will at least to some degree offer differing returns profiles over time.

Provided the returns on the shares are not perfectly positively correlated (that is they do not move in exactly the same

way) then any additional investment brought into a portfolio (subject to a maximum point - see below) will reduce the

overall risk faced.

Initial diversification will bring about substantial risk reduction as additional investments are added to the portfolio.

However risk reduction slows and eventually stops altogether once 15-20 carefully selected investments have been

combined.

This is because the total risk faced is not all of the same type.

The risk a shareholder faces is in large part due to the volatility ofthe company's earnings. This volatility can occur

because of:

systematic risk - market wide factors such as the state of the economy

non-systematic risk - company/industry specific factors.

Systematic risk will affect all companies in the same way (although to varying degrees). Non-systematic risk factors

will impact each firm differently, depending on their circumstances.

Diversification can almost eliminate unsystematic risk, but since all investments are affected by macro-economic

i.e.systematic factors, the systematic risk of the portfolio remains.

Rational risk-averse investors would wish to reduce the risk they faced to a minimum and would therefore:

arrange their portfolios to maximise risk reduction by holding at least 15-20 different investments

effectively eliminate any unsystematic risk

only need to be compensated for the remaining systematic risk they faced.

The returns on the shares of quoted companies can be compared to returns on the whole stock market (e.g. by

looking at an index such as the FTSE All shares index). Beta is found as the gradient of the regression line that

results.

Betas for projects are found by taking the beta of a quoted company in the same business sector as the project.

Note the quoted beta derived is an equity beta so may need adjusting before use.(see below).

The formula

The CAPM shows how the minimum required return on a quoted security depends on its risk.

The required return of a rational risk-averse well-diversified investor can be found by returning to our original

argument:

Required return = Rf + (Rm - Rf)

where:

Rf = risk-free rate

Rm = average return on the market

(Rm - Rf) = equity risk premium (sometimes referred to as average market risk premium)

= systematic risk of the investment compared to market and therefore amount of the premium needed.

Note: The use of CAPM in Accountancy exams

Different accountancy bodies use slightly different versions of the above equation. In particular the LHS is shown as

follows:

CIMA: "Required return" is given as Ke (the cost of equity)

ICAEW: "Required return" is given as rj

The formula is that of a straight line, y = a + bx, with as the independent variable, Rf as the intercept with the y-axis,

(Rm - Rf) as the slop of the line, and the required return as the dependent variable.

The line itself is called the security market line (SML) and can be drawn as:

Understanding beta:

If an investment is riskier than average (i.e. the returns more volatile than the average market returns) then > 1.

If an investment is less risky than average (i.e. the returns less volatile than the average market returns) then < 1.

If an investment is risk free then = 0.

To calculate a risk adjusted discount rate for a project a company will need to find a suitable beta factor for the new

investment and that these are best estimated with reference to existing companies operating in the same business

areas as the project.

The reason this approach works is:

those companies paying above average returns are assumed to have a correspondingly higher than

average systematic risk and their beta (the measure of the company's systematic risk compared to the

market) is extrapolated accordingly

the extrapolated beta is then considered a measure of the risk of that business area.

However, the above only considers the business risk. When using betas in project appraisal, the impact of financial

gearing (hereafter referred to as "gearing") must also be borne in mind.

Firms must provide a return to compensate for the risk faced by investors, and even for a well-diversified investor,

this systematic risk will have two causes:

the finance risk caused by its level of gearing.

both are identical in all respects including their business operations but

o A would need to pay out higher returns

o any beta extrapolated from A's returns will reflect the systematic risk of both its business and its

financial position and would therefore be higher than B's.

Equity reflects the systematic risk of the business area and the company-specific financial structure.

It is critical in examination questions to identify which type of beta you have been given and what risk it reflects. The

steps to calculating the right beta and how to use it in project appraisal are:

(1)Find an appropriate asset beta.

This may be given to you in the question. If not, you will need to calculate it by de-gearing a given equity beta. You

can do this using the asset beta formula given to you in the exam

However, in many exams, d will be assumed to be zero. This means that the asset beta formula can be simplified to:

where:

Ve = market value of equity

Vd = market value of debt

T = corporation tax rate.

When using this formula to de-gear a given equity beta, Ve and Vd should relate to the company or industry from

which the equity beta has been taken.

If using the adjusted present value (APV) approach, then this asset beta can be used to calculate a Ke to determine

the base case NPV.

If needing a risk adjusted WACC, then the following steps need to be followed as well.

Note: for a discussion of which approach to use when, please click here.

(2)Adjust the asset beta to reflect the gearing levels of the company making the investment

Re-gear the asset beta to convert it to an equity beta based on the gearing levels of the company undertaking the

project. The same asset beta formula as given above can be used, except this time V e and Vd will relate to the

company making the investment.

(3)Use the re-geared beta to find Ke. This is done using the standard CAPM formula.

Remember that CAPM just gives you a risk-adjusted Ke, so once a company has found the relevant shareholders'

required return for the project it could combine it with the cost of debt to calculate a risk adjusted weighted average

cost of capital. This is discussed in further detail here

- Multifactor Model CaseUploaded byJosh Brodsky
- AssignmentUploaded byHariKrishnan Unni
- Chapter 7—Risk, Return, and the Capital Asset Pricing ModelUploaded bybaha146
- Case 2 - AES - Questions(1)Uploaded byNatalie Skinner
- UT Dallas Syllabus for ba4346.001.07s taught by Valery Polkovnichenko (vxp065000)Uploaded byUT Dallas Provost's Technology Group
- Valuations 1Uploaded byelcesar24
- Return Risk and SmlUploaded byspectrum_48
- Capital Asset Pricing ModelUploaded byricha
- Fernadez (2007) - 110 Common Errors in Company ValuationsUploaded byblackmeo
- Calculating Beta ExcelUploaded byJohan Botha
- IRJFE4 7 grigorisUploaded byEugen Tudor
- Value ReviewUploaded byPraveen Chanpa
- Index and RiskUploaded byPrasad Kamath
- Performance Evaluation Using Conditional Alphas and BetasUploaded bybastian99
- Treynor RatioUploaded bysana_sr_96
- Warner Chilcott (WCRX,$WCRX) In Play? Company up 40% Since Inclusion in VE Forecast 16 PortfolioUploaded byValuEngine.com
- Arbitrage Pricing TheoryUploaded byRitesh Jain
- Risk and the cost of capitalUploaded byRobin Die
- day trader - aim 20130409Uploaded byPhilip Morrish
- day trader - aim 20130923Uploaded byPhilip Morrish
- day trader - aim 20131001Uploaded byPhilip Morrish
- FA04 - Introduction to Asset Pricing ModelsUploaded byjjj
- Adult Financial_Literacy.pdfUploaded byJasiz Philipe Ombugu
- 10_chapter 2.pdfUploaded byirfana hashmi
- Axis LongTerm EquityFundUploaded byAkhilesh Kumar
- IPPTChap012 mjp.pptUploaded byMehdi Rachdi
- 3Uploaded bycarolinetsang
- 4A0F08C61306Uploaded byNeema
- AQR Alternative Thinking 2Q12Uploaded bySamuel Lee
- Sem I 2014 2015 MidtermUploaded byFlanc

- Power Electronics Notes BetzUploaded byRobert Betz
- Combustion Analysis BasicsUploaded byTin Aung Kyi
- MG 1401 OPERATION RESEARCHUploaded bykararc
- Msc ThesisUploaded bydhea
- Full Scale Measurement of Dynamic Ship Motions and SquatUploaded bySarath Babu S
- 4040_w09_qp_1Uploaded bymstudy123456
- Nice MINE292 Laboratory ProcedureUploaded bybenrontol_20051786
- Read CID Register and Display on a PC ScreenUploaded byshajeenahamed
- Oral Surgery Board ReviewUploaded bymirfanulhaq
- 5M54C DC DURI0726120190423PRF01Uploaded byRyan Sinaga
- CS224d-Lecture7Uploaded byAndres Tuells Jansson
- Introduction to Geological Data AnalysisUploaded byFrancoPaúlTafoyaGurtz
- Validated FIPS 140-1 and FIPS 140-2 Cryptographic ModulesUploaded bysrotenstein3114
- Automatic TransmissionUploaded byAnandraj004
- Rollercoaster Project DraftUploaded bysamjshah
- Shear force and Bending momentUploaded bysiddhantkankrej
- Provenance Diagenesis and Paleogeographyof the Late Cretaceous Sediments Benin Flank Western Anambra BasinnigeriaUploaded byIJARP Publications
- Unit 1 StartUploaded byNcTung
- Overconfidence ArticleUploaded byBrett Bauchner
- Grade 5 MTAP Reviewer 2014Uploaded byAye-Yan Millan Arellano Velasco
- Application of Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR)Uploaded bythawatchai11222512
- PrestoUploaded byVignesh Kumar
- Verilog Operators DocUploaded bysrikar_datta
- User Guide Shape Designers a AsUploaded byMarcelo Carnicelli
- EVEREST Home Edition Report (March 13, 2010)Uploaded byRyan James Furniss
- Constitutive Model of the Alloy 2117-T4 at Low Strain[1]Uploaded byJavier Barrera
- Book of Vaadin 7Uploaded byAdam Washington
- 55998151 Dipankar Seminar ReportUploaded byanoopk222
- Chapter 8 - Advanced SortingUploaded byshemsedin shukre
- Resume - Nirmal PatelUploaded bygaurav_honi