You are on page 1of 18

Crimes against women under

Indian penal code

SUBMITTED BY:
SEMESTER: v
ROLL NUMBER: ECONOMICS MAJOR

SUBMITTED TO: Mr. vijay kumar singh


(FACULTY OF law)
SUBMITTED ON: 26/08/2013

HIDAYATULLAH NATIONAL
LAW UNIVERSITY
RAIPUR.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

INTRODUCTION
3
RESEARCH

Methodology

4
Unveiling the meaning of crimes
against women
A general gibbet of law
The Indian penal code

5
6
6

Verma Committee Report an


aftermath of the Jyoti Singh
Pandey/

Nirbhaya

Case

14

Conclusion

16

1.

Introduction

In the ancient Indian women held a high place of respect in the society as mentioned in
Rigveda and other scriptures. Volumes can be written about the status of our women and
their heroic deeds from the vedic period to the modern times. But later on, because of
social, political and economic changes, women lost their status and were relegated to the
background. Many evil customs and traditions stepped in which enslaved the women and
tied them to the boundaries of the house.1
It is pertinent that there has been a lag in the sex ratio with respect to women. Where the
literacy rate, health rate and work participation rates are on a constant decline. While on
the other hand the spread of social evils like dowry deaths, child marriage, domestic
violence, rape, sexual harassment, exploitation of women workers are rampant in
different parts of India. Humiliation, rape, kidnapping, molestation, dowry death, torture,
wife-beating etc. have grown up over the years.2
We are living in twenty first century. Also all our faiths teach us that the interests of
society are more important than those of the individual.3 Although Women may be
victims of any of the general crimes such as Murder, Robbery, Cheating, etc, only
the crimes which are directed specifically against Women are characterised as Crimes
1

Aruna Goel, Violence and Protective Measures for Women Development and Empowerment, Deep &
Deep Publications, New Delhi, 2004, 3-4
Awadhesh Kumar Singh and Jayanta Choudhury, Violence against Women and Children-Issues and
Concerns, Serials Publications, New Delhi, 2012, 1
Dr. Syed Zafar Mahmood, President at Interfaith Coalition for Peace, Crimes Against Women:
Punishment and Preemption (Unpublished manuscript).

Against Women. Various new legislations have been brought and amendments have
been made in existing laws with a view to handle these crimes effectively. These are
broadly classified under two categories. The categories maybe highlighted as that of
crimes under the Indian penal code; such as rape, abduction for specific purposes,
homicide for dowry or the attempt, physical and mental torture, molestation, harassment
and importation of girls. The second category can be that of crimes under special or local
laws. In case of crimes against women, the national crime records bureau has categorized
crimes such as rape, abduction and kidnapping, homicide, dowry death or their attempts,
torture- both mental and physical, molestation, eve-teasing, importation of girls,
commission of sati, dowry prohibition, immoral traffic and indecent representation of
women. Out of these culpable homicide for dowry, rape kidnapping and abduction are
considered as violent crimes.4
OBJECTIVES

To seek the meaning of crimes against women

To search the provisions that seek to provide justice to women for crimes
committed towards them under the Indian penal code.

To delve into recent changes brought about by the legislations passed.

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
This project is based on the method which requires research from secondary sources like
books, articles and online sources. The method of writing followed in the course of this
research paper is primarily analytical and descriptive.
A variety of books, articles and trusted websites have been referred to. Sources have been
acknowledged wherever felt.

Doel Mukherjee, Women and Urban Crimes, 74

2.
Unveiling the Meaning of
Crime against Women
On a semantic or psychological level the term pertains to any injury inflicted directly or
indirectly causing physical or mental infliction upon women. Crimes which are directed
specifically against women and in which only women are victims are characterized as
Crime Against Women.5 It is equally important to clarify the concept of Violence
against women. Violence is also known as abuse and include any sort of physical
aggression or misbehave. When violence is committed at home it becomes domestic
violence and involves family members such as children, spouse, parents or servants.
Domestic violence may involve different means such as hitting, kicking, biting, shoving,
restraining, throwing objects. In broad terms, it includes threats, sexual abuse, emotional
abuse, controlling or domineering, intimidation, stalking, passive/covert abuse and
economic deprivation, rape, abduction, kidnapping, murder (all cases of criminal
violence, dowry death, wife battering, sexual abuse, maltreatment of a widow and for an
elderly women (all cases of domestic violence) and eve-teasing, forcing wife/daughter-inlaw to go for foeticide, forcing a young widow to commit sati, etc (all cases of social
violence), are issues which affect a large section of society. 6 Also an inevitable facet of
violence is that when a kind or form of abuse is specifically directed against women and

5
6

Supra note 2 at 2.
Supra note 2 at 3.

therefore constitute a violation of the convention on the elimination of all forms of


discrimination against women7 is treated as an offence of crime against women.
There can also be found an internationally accepted connotation of Violence or offences
against women. It could be traced back to United Nations given definition in the 1993
Declaration on the Elimination of Violence against Women. It defines it as any act of
gender-based violence that results in, or is likely to result in, physical, sexual or
psychological harm or suffering to women, including threats of such acts, coercion or
arbitrary deprivation of liberty, whether occurring in public or private life.8

3.

A General Gibbet of Law

The principle of gender equality is enshrined in the Indian Constitution in its Preamble,
Fundamental Rights albeit Articles 149, 1510, 1611, Fundamental Duties enshrined in
Article 39(a)(d)12 and Directive Principles as in Article 4213. The Constitution not only
grants equality to women, but also empowers the State to adopt measures of positive
discrimination in favour of women for counterbalancing the cumulative socio economic,
education and political disadvantages faced by the women. Within the framework of a
democratic polity, our laws, development policies, Plans and programmes have aimed at
womens advancement in different spheres. India has also ratified various international
conventions and human rights instruments committing to secure equal rights of women.
7

Gabriel Kirk McDonald, Substantive and Procedural Aspects of International Criminal Law, V II Part 1,
Kluwer Law International, 398.
8
Guruappa Naidu, Violence Against Women in India, Serials Publications, New Delhi 2011, 23.
9
Article 14, confers on men and women equal rights and opportunities in political,
economic and social sphere.
10
Article 15, prohibits, discrimination against any citizen on grounds of religion, race,
caste, sex etc.
11
Article 16, provides for equality of opportunities matters relating to employment or
appointment to any office under the state.
12
Article 39(a)(d), mentions policy security of state equality for both men and women
the right to a means of livelihood and equal pay for equal work for both men and
women.
13
Article 42, Direct the State to make provision for ensuring just and humane
conditions of work and maternity relief.

Key among them is the ratification of the Convention on Elimination of All Forms of
Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW) in 1993.14

4.

The Indian Penal Code

The bedrock of our penal system is the Indian penal code which is a combination of
western scientific outlook and oriental sensitivity. The code covers a vast range of anti
social behaviour in relation to the state of society as it was enlisted more than a hundred
years ago. The IPC makes broad classification of crimes against property person and
state.15 There are seven crimes in particular that can be categorized as exercisable only on
women; such as rape, kidnapping and abduction, dowry death, torture and cruelty,
molestation, sexual harassment and importation of girls.

4.1 Rape
The concept of rape is defined under section 375 of the Indian Penal Code along with
section 376 that prescribes punishment for rape. There were various amendments made in
the year 1983 prior to the recent changes brought about by the criminal law amendment
bill 2013 to make section 376 more effective.16 The offence of rape in its simplest term is
the ravishment of a woman, without her consent, by force, fear or fraud, or against her
will17 or the carnal knowledge of a woman by force against her will 18the physical scar
may heal but the mental scar haunts the victim prosecutrix throughout her lifetime. The
act hence is considered as extremely brazen and heinous. A man commits rape when he
has sexual intercourse with a woman firstly, against her will. Secondly, without her
consent, thirdly with her consent that is derived by inflicting fear of death or hurt of her
body or a person whom she is interested in. Fourthly, with her consent when the man
indulging in the sexual activity induces the woman to have sex with him on the false
14

India, Ministry of Statistics and programme Implementation, Women and Men in India 2012, 14th Issue,
p. xiii.
15
A. Sivamurthy, Indian Journal of Criminology, Volume 4, 1 January 1986, 17.
16
The Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 1983.
17
Dr. Dalbir Bharti, Women and the Law ( A. P. H publishing corporation, Edn. 2008) 113.
18
Nelsons Pakistan Penal Code, 7th Edn. 1983 V II, 2014.

assumption of him being her husband on purpose. Fifthly, on her consent when at the
time of giving her consent she is intoxicated or is of unsound mind.19
Custodial rape
Section 376 B 376 D comprise a group of sections that create a new category of
offence, known as custodial rape which amounts to rape because in such cases the
consent of the victim is obtained under the compelling circumstances where the rapists
hold a supervisory position.20
Sex During Seperation
Sex during separation if unconsented makes it punishable under Section 376 A
Punishment for Rape
Section 376 provides for a minimum period of imprisonment of seven yearsof
imprisonment under clause 1 and ten years under clause 2. Also, gang rapes may call
upon death penalty.

4.2 Kidnapping and Abduction


Section 366 of the penal code enumerates that kidnapping or abducting a woman with an
intent to compel her to marry without her will, or be seduced or knowing that such a
result is likely. Such an act would call upon punishment of imprisonment that maybe
exceeded to period of 10 years along with a liability to fine. The offence is not bailable.
Sections 372 and 373 punishes an offender with an imprisonment upto ten years along
with a fine for selling, letting. Buying or hiring a minor for the purpose of prostitution.
This is a non bailable offence.

19

Added by the Amending Act of 1983. The fifth clause then had been renumbered as the sixth clause.
Consent obtained under this condition would not be considered as free and good in law and the accused
will be held liable for the offence.
20
KD Gaur, The Indian Penal Code, 644.

If the woman is under 16 years of age, her consent or intention is immaterial. The main
object of this section is to protect girls under 16 years of age and prevent persons from
taking improper advantage of their youth and innocence.21

4.3 Dowry Deaths


A unique form of violence experienced by women is Dowry Death and now, the most
common one. These cases have increased by 2.7% during the year 2011 over the previous
year (8,391 cases). 26.9% of the total such cases reported in the country were reported
from Uttar Pradesh (2,322) cases alone followed by Bihar (1,413 cases) (16.4%). The
highest rate of crime (1.4) was reported from Bihar as compared to the National average
of 0.7.22
The term dowry death was included in the penal code in the year 1986 under section
304B by the Dowry Prohibition (Amendment) Act, 1986.23 And since the evidentiary
aspect may be really hard to ponder upon since it is very difficult to prove what exactly
has been happening inside a house. Generally it is presumed that if a married woman dies
within seven years of her marriage in suspicious circumstances then it could be a dowry
death. The period of seven years was as decided in Iqbal Case24 set as a benchmark to
confirm a dowry death however there is no prescribed limit for scooting the charges of
dowry demand beyond any number of years post marriage. Similarly, if section 113B of
the Evidence act25 is to be invoked along with this section of the code then there has to be
a clear and cogently proven that the deceased had been subjected to cruelty or
harassment. As held in the case of satbir singh26 that once the prosecution establishes the
ingredients of dowry death the burden of proof shifts to the defence. The various
ingredients say that the death should have been caused by burns or bodily injuries or

21

Mahrukh adenwala, Child Sexual Abuse and the Law, (HRLN, 2008) 43.
India, Ministry of Home Affairs, National Crime Records Bureau, Crime in India, 2011, 84.
23
K. D Gaur, A Textbook on the Indian Penal Code (Edn. 4, Universal Law Publishing) 515.
24
State of Punjab v. Iqbal Singh, AIR 1991 SC 1532.
25
Presumption as to Dowry Death, Inserted by Act 43 of 1986
26
Satbir Singh v. state of Haryana, AIR 2005 SC 3546.
22

otherwise than under in normal circumstances.27 Death should have been occurred within
seven years of marriage; there should be evident subjection of cruelty or harassment by
the husband or any relative of the husband. The cruelty should have been caused as an
aftermath of a dowry demand and should be meted out before the death. 28 A well
publicized case can exemplify this societal vice, that of Laxman Kumar29 wherein he was
the husband of Sudha who was pregnant and found by the neighbours set ablaze. She in
her dying declaration accused mother in law and her brother in laws. The apex court ruled
that it was not an accident but a murder for considered to be for the purpose of dowry.
Another case of Amarjit Singh30wherein the rapacious husband had set his newly wedded
wife Balwinder on fire for the sake of money. The accused had returned from broad and
wanted to go again and wanted the in laws to finance his second trips. Balwinder too was
rescued by her neighbours. She died after giving her statement to the assistant sub
inspector. The accused was finally found guilty and she was keerosened and then lit.

4.4 Torture and cruelty of husband or his relatives Section 498a


.498A was introduced in the year 1983 to protect married women from being subjected to
cruelty by the husband or his relatives. A punishment extending to 3 years and fine has
been prescribed. The expression cruelty has been defined in wide terms so as to include
inflicting physical or mental harm to the body or health of the woman and indulging in
acts of harassment with a view to coerce her or her relations to meet any unlawful
demand for any property or valuable security.31 Whoever, being the husband or the
relative of the husband of a woman, subjects such woman to cruelty shall be punished
with imprisonment for a term which may extend to three years and shall also be liable to
fine.

27

2003 (1) SCALE 30.


Hans Raj V. State of Punjab, 2000 (3) RI 556.
29
Laxman Kumar and Indian Federation of Women Lawyers v. shakuntala, AIR 1986 SC 250.
30
State of Punjab v. Amarjit Singh, AIR 1988 SC 2013.
31
Law commission of India Report no. 243, http://lawcommissionofindia.nic.in/reports/report243.pdf
28

10

Analysis of the section shows that this law deals with four types of cruelty: Any conduct
that is likely to drive a woman to suicide, Any conduct which is likely to cause grave
injury to the life, limb or health of the woman, Harassment with the purpose of forcing
the woman or her relatives to give some property, or Harassment because the woman or
her relatives are either unable to yield to the demand for more money or do not give some
share of the property.32 Harassment for dowry falls within the sweep of latter limb of the
section. Creating a situation driving the woman to commit suicide is also one of the
ingredients of cruelty. The offence under s.498A is cognizable, non-compoundable and
non-bailable.33 In the case of Preeti Gupta v. State of Jharkhand34 decided in 2010, the
Supreme Court observed that a serious relook of the provision is warranted by the
Legislature. The Court said: It is a matter of common knowledge that exaggerated
versions of the incidents are reflected in a large number of complaints. The Court took
note of the common tendency to implicate husband and all his immediate relations. Sushil
Kumar Sharma v. UOI35, the Supreme Court lamented that in many instances, complaints
under s.498A were being filed with an oblique motive to wreck personal vendetta. It was
also observed that by misuse of the provision, a new legal terrorism can be unleashed.
Reference may be made in this context to the decision of Delhi High Court in
Chandrabhan v. State and of the Madras High Court in the case of Tr. Ramaiah v. State.
In the former case, it was observed that there is no iota of doubt that most of the
complaints are filed in the heat of the moment over trifling fights and ego clashes. It is
also a matter of common knowledge that in their tussle and ongoing hostility, the hapless
children are the worst victims.

4.5 Molestation: Outraging the Modesty of a Woman; Section 354 and


harassment

32

http://ipc498a.files.wordpress.com/2007/11/what-is-section-498a-of-the-indian-penal-code.pdf
Supra note 30.
34
AIR 2010 SC 3363
35
2005 6 SCC 281
33

11

This law gives wide latitude to sex criminals, and a maximum sentence of two years. The
word modesty is key. Unlike an arm or a leg, modesty is difficult to define. Section 354
of the Indian Penal Code never explains exactly what modesty is, but acknowledges that
outraging it is a crime.36 It was held in Rupan Deol Bajaj case37that slapping a woman on
her posterior amounted to outraging her modesty covered under this section. Also, a
question was raised in the case of sakshi v. UOI38 that how come forced sex between a
daughter and her father who penetrated her in three orifices not amount to rape and
amount only to outraging her modesty
As per 354B whoever assaults or uses criminal force to any woman or abets such act with
the intention of disrobing or compelling her to be naked in any public place, shall be
punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which shall not be less than
three years but which may extend to seven years and with fine.39 Stalking is also made
punishable under this section. Whoever follows a person and contacts, or attempts to
contact such person to foster personal interaction repeatedly, despite a clear indication of
disinterest by such person, or whoever monitors the use by a person of the internet, email
or any other form of electronic communication, or watches or spies on a person in a
manner that results in a fear of violence or serious alarm or distress in the mind of such
person, or interferes with the mental peace of such person, commits the offence of
stalking.40

4.6 Importation of girl


Section 366-B of Indian Penal Code provides that: Whoever imports into India from any
country outside India or from the State of Jammu and Kashmir any girl under the age of
twenty-one years with intent that she may be, or knowing it to be likely that she will be,

36

http://shovonc.wordpress.com/2012/07/10/know-your-laws-indian-penal-code-1860-section-354outraging-a-womans-modesty/
37
Rupan Deol Bajaj v. KPS Gill, AIR1996 SC 309.
38
[2004] 3 LRI 242.
39
http://legalservices.co.in/forum/topic/Sec-354A-354B-354C-354D-IPC-Sexual-harassment.htm.
40
Section 354D.

12

forced or seduced to illicit intercourse with another person, shall be punishable with
imprisonment which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine.41
This offence under Section 366-B is cognizable, non-bailable and non-compoundable and
is exclusively triable by the Court of Session. Article 23 of the Constitution of India
prohibited traffic in human beings. After coming into force of the Constitution of India
this section was amended to bring it in accord with the changed circumstances.42
Similarly section 377 prohibits unnatural sex and makes sodomy practiced on a woman
an offence.

5.
Verma Committee Report an
aftermath of the Jyoti Singh
Pandey/ Nirbhaya Case
On December 23, 2012 a three member Committee headed by Justice J.S. Verma, former
Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, was constituted to recommend amendments to the
Criminal Law so as to provide for quicker trial and enhanced punishment for criminals
accused of committing sexual assault against women. The other members on the
Committee were Justice Leila Seth, former judge of the High Court and Gopal
Subramanium, former Solicitor General of India.43 The Committee recommended that
non-penetrative forms of sexual contact should be regarded as sexual assault. The
offence of sexual assault should be defined so as to include all forms of non-consensual
non-penetrative touching of a sexual nature. The sexual nature of an act should be
determined on the basis of the circumstances. Sexual gratification as a motive for the act
should not be prerequisite for proving the offence. The offence should be punishable
with 5 years of imprisonment, or fine, or both.

41

Section 366 B, Indian Penal Code


http://www.shareyouressays.com/119053/importation-of-girl-from-foreign-country-section-366b-of-ipc.
43
http://www.prsindia.org/parliamenttrack/report-summaries/justice-verma-committee-report-summary2628/.
42

13

Some of the key recommendations made by the Committee on the Sexual Harassment of
Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Bill, 2012 that is pending
in Parliament are provided below: Domestic workers should be included within the
purview of the Bill. Under the Bill the complainant and the respondent are first required
to attempt conciliation. This is contrary to the Supreme Court judgment in Vishakha vs.
State of Rajasthan which aimed to secure a safe workplace to women. The employer
should pay compensation to the woman who has suffered sexual harassment. The Bill
requires the employer to institute an internal complaints committee to which complaints
must be filed. Such an internal committee defeats the purpose of the Bill and instead,
there should be an Employment Tribunal to receive and adjudicate all complaints.44
The Committee rejected the proposal for chemical castration as it fails to treat the social
foundations of rape. It opined that death penalty should not be awarded for the offence of
rape as there was considerable evidence that death penalty was not a deterrence to serious
crimes. It recommended life imprisonment for rape.45
The Justice JS Verma Committee recommended 20 years imprisonment for gang-rape
and life imprisonment for rape and murder but refrained from using the term "death
penalty" though there was public outcry to sentence rapists with death sentence following
the brutal gang-rape and murder of a 23-year-old medical student in Delhi on Dec. 16,
2012.However, the ordinance passed by the Cabinet went for a more stringent
punishment for a rapist - a minimum of 20 years imprisonment for rapists and even death
penalty in extreme cases. Verma panel recommended criminalization of marital rape but
the ordinance rejected it.

6.

Conclusion

Breaking bad news is not an easy task. Its like choosing the best bad idea. And for that it
is most appreciated that you forgive the bearer, for being the bearer is not an easy
44
45

Supra note 43
Supra note 43.

14

task. But, there is one magic trick that drives me crazy and which I would like to stop.
Please, dont bury the lede. It never works.
When Greta Christina writes about rape and the psyche of rapists she says that it is
impossible (next to) to convince a man to not rape because successful efforts aiming rape
prevention would only dwell on an accomplished footing if the world we are referring to
is in utopia. Rapists are sociopaths who are beyond the reach of persuasion or reason.
Merely passing strong laws is not enough, and that the government has to convey its
intention to crack down on crimes against women to its officials and the police. It is
pertinent to note that the punishments prescribe to what the penal exercise will be in case
an act of rape or molestation is committed. But the lacuna lies in the fact that stringent
punishments may apply on offenders who have committed the act. The punishments may
be exemplary and may bring reduction in the number of such crimes but can it prevent
the crime from happening at all?
"Enacting strong laws are simply a first step, but it needs the government to focus
urgently on implementation if it is serious about protecting children and other victims of
sexual abuse,'' Human Rights Watch's Ganguly said.
Hence to conclude, it is easy to punish a perpetrator than preventing him from
committing the crime of rape. Hence, in such posterity the thrust and the entire onus of
protecting the prospective victim from this harsh and demeaning way of sexual
gratification lies entirely on the woman herself and her family. The helpline numbers that
were generated by the Delhi Police are a medium to report grievances if a woman
suspects an impending danger upon her dignity. However, the major drawback that the
preventive act suffers is that is hinders the independence of women by placing zillions of
barriers in their existence where they have to time themselves all the time. Such is not
only contrary to their right of equality but causes an aspersion to their intrinsic rights as a
human being. The answer to the question of whether a woman in India is safe if she steps
out of her house after six in the evening is circumscribed in the nebulous clouds of
ambiguity searching for an appropriate answer and a suitable recourse.
15

bibliography
Books and articles
A. Sivamurthy, Indian Journal of Criminology, Volume 4, 1 January 1986, 17.
Aruna Goel, Violence and Protective Measures for Women Development and
Empowerment, Deep & Deep Publications, New Delhi, 2004, 3-4
Awadhesh Kumar Singh and Jayanta Choudhury, Violence against Women and ChildrenIssues and Concerns, Serials Publications, New Delhi, 2012, 1
Doel Mukherjee, Women and Urban Crimes, 74
Dr. Dalbir Bharti, Women and the Law ( A. P. H publishing corporation, Edn. 2008) 113.
Dr. Syed Zafar Mahmood, President at Interfaith Coalition for Peace, Crimes Against
Women: Punishment and Preemption (Unpublished manuscript).
Gabriel Kirk McDonald, Substantive and Procedural Aspects of International Criminal
Law, V II Part 1, Kluwer Law International, 398.
Guruappa Naidu, Violence Against Women in India, Serials Publications, New Delhi
2011, 23.
India, Ministry of Home Affairs, National Crime Records Bureau, Crime in India, 2011,
84.
India, Ministry of Statistics and programme Implementation, Women and Men in India
2012, 14th Issue,
K. D Gaur, A Textbook on the Indian Penal Code (Edn. 4, Universal Law Publishing)
515.
KD Gaur, The Indian Penal Code, 644.
16

Mahrukh adenwala, Child Sexual Abuse and the Law, (HRLN, 2008) 43.
Nelsons Pakistan Penal Code, 7th Edn. 1983 V II, 2014.
p. xiii.

weblinks
http://ipc498a.files.wordpress.com/2007/11/what-is-section-498a-of-the-indian-penalcode.pdf

http://legalservices.co.in/forum/topic/Sec-354A-354B-354C-354D-IPC-Sexualharassment.htm.
http://shovonc.wordpress.com/2012/07/10/know-your-laws-indian-penal-code-1860section-354-outraging-a-womans-modesty
http://www.prsindia.org/parliamenttrack/report-summaries/justice-verma-committeereport-summary-2628/.
http://www.shareyouressays.com/119053/importation-of-girl-from-foreign-countrysection-366b-of-ipc.

17