21 views

Uploaded by Enterim

An analysis of the proximity effect of microphones.

- 398a969c-821c-4a46-bf32-93fbd5ef9c27.pdf
- spa-400.pdf
- xenyx 802 Especificaciones
- Grand Opera House, York Technical Plan
- Print Handout
- Auto Motor Sport 0409 Lowres
- Quick Start Guide
- How to Record an Electric Guitar with an Amplifier
- Nt5 Product Manual
- bp0262
- Presentation 2
- 159258080 CXC MATHS Formula Sheet
- asthmaguard proposal
- Asme Power 2008
- soundstation_vtx1000_user_guide.pdf
- MMC Elimination 2016
- Aptitude Test
- T6hgk
- Maths Ext 1 2013 ITute.com Solutions
- ACT Math Handout

You are on page 1of 7

Presented at the 110th Convention

2001 May 1215

Amsterdam, The Netherlands

This convention paper has been reproduced from the authors advance manuscript, without editing, corrections, or consideration

by the Review Board. The AES takes no responsibility for the contents. Additional papers may be obtained by sending request

and remittance to Audio Engineering Society, 60 East 42nd Street, New York, New York 10165-2520, USA; also see www.aes.org.

All rights reserved. Reproduction of this paper, or any portion thereof, is not permitted without direct permission from the

Journal of the Audio Engineering Society.

___________________________________

Proximity Effect of microphone

Milanov N. E. and Milanova B. E.

Milanov N. E. and Milanova B. E.

1.

Introduction

In this article we discuss the proximity effect of electro-dynamic microphones with two acoustical

entrances. The proximity effect is appearing when a directed microphone is getting closer to the sound

source. It is described as a alteration of the frequency response and more specifically as an increase of the

microphones sensitivity when the distance is decreasing. The reason for this change is the change of form

of the sound wave from a plane to a sphere when the distance to the sound source is decreasing. The goal

of this article is to determine the relationship of the proximity effect from the angle between the sound

wave and the acoustical axis of the microphone.

The article uses the following symbols:

Z1 - mechanical impedance of the membrane.

Z0, Z2 impedance of the phase correction circuit.

D - the distance between the two acoustical entrances.

r the distance between the sound source and the front surface of the microphone (the first acoustical

entrance).

B * l the relation coefficient between electrical and mechanical value.

w - circle frequency.

c sound speed in air.

A coefficient of the form.

d phase delay, defined by the distance between the two acoustical entrances.

f - phase delay defined from the phase correction circuit of the microphone.

r - phase delay, defined by of the distance between the sound source and the microphone.

2. Assumed conditions

In this article we are inspecting an electro- dynamic microphone with two acoustical entrances. The

distance between the two acoustical entrances is d. The distance to the sound source is r. The article

examines the low frequencies where the inequality Z2 < Z0 is valid and < 1 and we can assume:

ej = 1- j

On figure 1 are depicted the sound pressures applied on the first and the second acoustical entrances when

the sound wave is a plane or a sphere as a function of the angle.

On figure 2 is shown the typical electro-mechanical scheme of a electro-dynamic microphone with two

acoustical entrances. The typical electro-mechanical scheme of the examined microphone correspond to the

one shown in figure 2.

dcos

2nd Entr.

1st Entr.

f

r

Ppl = P1 e

d

Ppl = P1 e j(r + dcos)

-jr

r

d

Psf = (P1/ r) e-jr

Fig 1.

2nd Entr.

1st Entr.

Z2

Z1

Ppl = P1 e

-jr

ZO

cos)

Fig 2.

S()sf = [(P1 P2) / Zmech] = [K1.( 1- e (jd.cos + f ) / (1 + d cos / r)] / Zm =

[K1.( 1 + d.cos / r - 1 + j(d.cos + f ) / (1 + d cos / r)] / Zm =

[K1.( d.cos / r + j(d.cos + f ) / (1 + d cos / r)] / Zm

(1)

When r is much bigger than d the sphere wave front is approximated to a plane. The microphone sensibility

in a field of a plane wave front is:

S()pl = [K1.( j(d.cos + f ))] / Zm

(2)

By definition the proximity effect is the ratio of the sensibility of the microphone in a spherical and plane

sound wave.

In accordance with equation 1 and 2 we can write:

P()prox =

S()sp / S()pl =

[[K1.( d.cos / r + j(d.cos + f ) / (1 + d cos / r)] / Zm] / [[K1.( j(d.cos + f ))] / Zm] =

(3)

[(d.cos / r) / j(d.cos + f ) (1 + d cos / r)] + [1 / (1 + d cos / r)]

The module of the proximity effect as a function of the angle is:

| P()prox | 2= [(d.cos / r) / (d.cos + f ) (1 + d cos / r)] 2 + [1 / (1 + d cos / r)] 2

(4)

When the attach angle = 0 from 4 we can conclude that the proximity effect is:

| P()prox | 2= [(d / r) / (d + f ) (1 + d / r)] 2 + [1 / (1 + d / r)] 2 =

[(d / r) / (f (1 + A) (1 + d / r)] 2 + [1 / (1 + d / r)] 2

(5)

The equation 5 represent the proximity effect when the angle is equal to 0. When A is the form coefficient.

When A equals 1 the polar pattern is a cardioid A = 1,73 hyper-cardioid and A = 3 super-cardioid. The

proximity effect when = 0 degrees is a function of the relation d/r and the sum from the phase angle f

and form coefficient A.

From formula 5 we can determine the phase angle f:

| f | 2 = [(d / r) / [ (1 + A) (1 + d / r)2 (| P()prox | 2 (1 / (1 + d / r)2) )]

(6)

The proximity effect when = 90 degrees and in accordance with equation 4 is:

P(90)prox = 1

(7)

When = 90 there is no proximity effect. This is because there is no difference between the ways to the

first and the second acoustical entrances which leads to equal amplitudes on both acoustical entrances and

is independent from the form of the sound wave. From formulas 7 and 5 is clear that when equals 90

degrees there is no proximity effect and when decreasing of the angle the proximity effect is increasing. It

reaches its maximum when equals 0 degrees.

On figure 3 are shown the theoretical dependencies of the proximity effect in relation to the angle (in the

chart q = , d = 5.10-2, r = 1.10 -2).

On figure 4 are shown the theoretical characteristics of the proximity effect of the ratio of the sensitivity at

an arbitrary angle in a field of a spherical wave front to the sensitivity when the angle is 0 in a field of

a plane wave front.

Spectral dependencies of the proximity effect from the angle are shown at page 196 from the Anthology

of articles on microphone form the the pages of the Journal of the Audio Engineering Society Vol1.

Vol27.)

Conclusion

The proximity effect is dependent from the angle between the direction of the sound wave and the

acoustical axis of the microphone.

Literature:

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

Swiaz publishing Moscow 1979

Skuchich W. Osnowi acustici

Mir publishing Moscow 1976

Forduev W.W. Acusticheski osnowi weschania

MGU publishing Moscow 1960

Vulchev I. Electroacustica

Technica publishing, Sofia 1975

Milanov E. N. Relationship between cardioid, supercardioid and hypercardioid directional

characteristics of electrodynamic microphones with two acoustical entrances National Conference

with foreign participation W. Turnovo 1984

6.

7.

8.

9.

electrodynamic microphones National Conference with foreign participation W. Turnovo 1987

Milanov E.N. Patent 51997

Milanov E.N. Electro Dynamic Microphone with Extended Frequency Response presented at the

104th Convention 1998 May Amsterdam

Milanov E.N. Proximity Effect Frequency Characteristics of Directional Microphones presented at

107th Convention 2000 April Paris.

- 398a969c-821c-4a46-bf32-93fbd5ef9c27.pdfUploaded byAdnen Guedria
- spa-400.pdfUploaded byflorin071
- xenyx 802 EspecificacionesUploaded bydannydanieldanny
- Grand Opera House, York Technical PlanUploaded byRhys Siddons
- Print HandoutUploaded byKreshia KC Yambing Iledan
- Auto Motor Sport 0409 LowresUploaded byTim Stubbs
- Quick Start GuideUploaded byEstudiantes FC
- How to Record an Electric Guitar with an AmplifierUploaded byRasheeq Rayhan
- Nt5 Product ManualUploaded byByron2112
- bp0262Uploaded byLOUKILkarim
- Presentation 2Uploaded byRaman Deep Singh
- 159258080 CXC MATHS Formula SheetUploaded byEric D Medeci
- asthmaguard proposalUploaded byapi-279331704
- Asme Power 2008Uploaded byHernan Giraut
- soundstation_vtx1000_user_guide.pdfUploaded bygiuseppe.falcone
- MMC Elimination 2016Uploaded byHaironisaMalaoMacagaan
- Aptitude TestUploaded byPaula Cangco
- T6hgkUploaded byJimmy Orajay
- Maths Ext 1 2013 ITute.com SolutionsUploaded byYe Zhang
- ACT Math HandoutUploaded byKeri Rossner
- Course Outline Dbm1013 (2)Uploaded byHeidi King
- lessonplanUploaded byapi-248122124
- TrigonometryUploaded byExercitus
- middleschool-howwellsoundtravelsUploaded byapi-229697510
- Chap1 Sec2 EUploaded byĐình Long
- Section1 Exp1 Team2 20155131 이주순Uploaded by이주순
- ppa-04-001Uploaded byRounak Vyas
- lesson plan rebekah reisnerUploaded byapi-399750986
- MethUploaded byananananymous
- Polar CoordinatesUploaded byteo2005

- Cigarette smoke and adverse health effects.pdfUploaded byhendra cahyadita
- Beyma Complete CatalogueUploaded byRadu Badoiu
- Effect of Different Parameters on the Performance of Rib Roughness Solar DuctUploaded byIRJET Journal
- Memoria Plancha 367368389 y 414Uploaded byMario Prince
- Pthalic Anhydride LampiranUploaded byAdhen Syahputra
- sta4395eUploaded byStefano Negri
- Hot Melting Cutting Stabilitex JAIC 1988, Volume 27, Number 1, Article 2 (PpUploaded bySonia Kata
- Pre-test Science 6Uploaded byAnonymous yIlaBBQQ
- Mix Design Manual.pdfUploaded byB R Paul Fortin
- Intro to ToxicologyUploaded byChanthouen Pich
- 2chloroethanoleUploaded byDavid Orjonikidze
- Hazen Williams CoefficientsUploaded byAshish Gulrandhe
- metalUploaded bybobcrysto
- 05500Uploaded bykhalid764
- ALFA LAVAL Compact Heat Exchangers in HVAC SystemsUploaded byvickers
- Water-Cooled Series R(TM) RTHD Product ReportUploaded bytrangocvu
- Wear Properties of Friction and Antifriction Metallic and Non-metallic MaterialUploaded byAmeya
- Gamma Compatible Materials ListUploaded byGilbert Wong
- Effects of Cement Treatment on the 1-D Consolidation Behavior of a Highly Organic (Hwang, 2006, Thesis)Uploaded byAnonymous AkyptYCCe2
- PhotosynthesisUploaded byJay Ronsson
- Michelson Final 2 v 1Uploaded bykingboy
- BleachUploaded byAina Shoib
- Conrete Lab ManualUploaded byChandrakanth Kaplapure
- 2010-09-17revisionGC3TopicalTransdermalUploaded bypremray
- Diseño Geométrico de Carreteras -ToMO 1 Pedro J AnduezaUploaded byEddy Franklin Ramirez Mamani
- 150x125 FS4LA 5 45_50HzUploaded byhoàng đình sơn
- Asphalt Pavements TunnelsMay2008Uploaded byodemircioglu2
- Tutorial 3 Biology IIUploaded byKrishnaah Smuglerzz
- ASTM A268Uploaded byslartibartfast69
- Collapse of Cavitation BubblesUploaded byVincent J. Cataldi