Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Introduction
Diarrhoea
Diarrhoea is a very common complaint; however, perception of what is true `diarrhoea' varies widely among
patients [5]. Complaints may vary, from the passage of
abnormal stool consistency to urgency of defecation or to
an increase in frequency of motion.
Mostgastroenterologists woulddene chronicdiarrhoeaas
an increase in frequency of defecation (greater than three
motions per day) and passing more than 200 g/day of stool
weight for a minimum of 1 month as being abnormal [5].
Aetiology
The causes of diarrhoea in the HIV-seropositive population
have changed in recent years. In the past, intestinal
spore-forming protozoa such as cryptosporidia (C. parvum)
and microsporidia (E. bieneusi and E. intestinalis) were
among the most common infective agents [6]. Other
protozoal organisms commonly affecting HIV-seropositive individuals include giardia (Giardia lamblia),
amoeba (Entamoeba histolytica) and, less commonly,
isospora (Isospora belli) and cyclospora (Cyclospora
cayetanensis).
Since the Department of Health issued guidelines in 1994
[7], advising immunocompromised patients to boil all
194
Pathogenesis
The pathogenesis of diarrhoea is incompletely understood.
In HIV patients, the presence of malabsorption features
associated with small bowel villous atrophy and impairment of gut permeability are often found [11]. These
ndings in symptomatic patients with no causative
organism detected were grouped previously into those
with `HIV-induced enteropathy'. However, similar but
milder features can also be seen in asymptomatic HIV
patients [12]. Previous studies have shown disproportionate
reductions in the numbers of CD4 T-cell lymphocytes in the
lamina propria compared to circulating levels of CD4 in the
plasma [13,14]. The number and functional capacity of CD4
cells may be important in controlling villous height [15].
Opportunistic enteroparasites such as cryptosporidia and
microsporidia can produce profound villous atrophy, and
are known to be associated with very low levels of CD4
lymphocytes in the lamina propria [16,17]. Recent
prospective follow-up studies in patients following
HAART showed that, with successful viral suppression,
redistribution of T cells occurs, and results in an increase in
CD4 numbers both in the circulation and in the gut [18,19].
For those patients with a gut pathogen, activated memory
CD4 cells high in CD44 (a migratory adhesion molecule)
increase in the gut and improvements in villous height with
normalization of functional gut permeability, as measured
by sugar absorption tests, are seen [1820].
It is thought that after invasion of the enterocyte by
spore-forming protozoal organisms, the epithelial cells
release cytokines that activate the resident phagocytes and
recruit new phagocytes into the lamina propria from the
blood pool [21]. The activated leucocytes then release
Investigations
The most important investigation is stool analysis. Light
microscopy and culture of stool is required for routine
pathogens; however, special stains such as the modied
Ziehl-Nielsen [25], Calcouor [26] and trichrome stains
[27] should be requested for immunocompromised patients.
Stool light microscopy and culture are highly specic but
not particularly sensitive tests and therefore at least three,
and preferably six, different stool samples should be sent
for examination [6]. Newer polymerase chain reaction
(PCR) techniques are available, but these tests are costly
and time-consuming and therefore not routinely available
in hospital practice [28,29]. The sensitivity of PCR
techniques for both cryptosporidia and microsporidia
may be much better than currently available techniques.
In the case of cryptosporidia, the threshold for detection is
50 oocysts per gram of stool, compared to a threshold of
50 000 oocysts per gram of stool with routine light
microscopy [30,31]. For microsporidia the threshold for
PCR detection is 100 spores per gram of stool, compared
with light microscopy where the detection threshold is
between 104 and 106 spores per gram of stool [29]. Thus,
some of the individuals formerly diagnosed with pathogennegative diarrhoea may have been infected with these
organisms.
Gut biopsy is an important tool in the investigation of
diarrhoea. Ten per cent of those with cryptosporidial
infections may be detected by gut biopsy, despite stool
samples remaining negative [32]. Identication of microsporidia in the small bowel at light microscopy may be
difcult due to the intracellular nature of the organism and
its poor staining properties with routine histological stains.
Previously electron microscopy was the `gold standard' and
the only reliable method for species identication [33]. This
was particularly relevant as certain microsporidia species
(E. intestinalis) respond better to treatments such as
albendazole when compared to others [34]. PCR analysis
of either gut or stool samples can also help to identify the
type of microsporidia species that was undertaken previously by electron microscopy [35].
Endoscopic examination can also help to exclude other
more rare causes of diarrhoea seen in late-stage AIDS, such
as lymphomas, the frequency of which have been less
affected by the introduction of HAART [36].
Management of diarrhoea
For those patients presenting with diarrhoea as their initial
AIDS-presenting diagnosis, the most important goal is to
identify any treatable infections or neoplasms. History of
the illness may give valuable clues to the aetiology.
Patients with low-volume diarrhoea tend to resolve
spontaneously or can be controlled with antimotility
agents, a response that is also seen in patients with irritable
bowel syndrome [5].
In HIV-seropositive patients, the single most important
factor governing the severity of disease and prognosis is the
degree of immune suppression in individual patients. A CD4
count of above 200 cells/mL normally indicates that although
opportunistic infections such as cryptosporidiosis and
microsporidiosis can occur, they tend only to be transient
illnesses [37], with the immune system still being able to
eradicate the parasites through a cellular immune response.
For those with CD4 counts below 200 cellls/mL the
treatment of choice is initiation of HAART, but the
diagnosis of other associated pathogens with readily
available treatments is also important. Aside from cryptosporidiosis and microsporidiosis, HIV patients also have a
higher incidence of other gut pathogens, including
bacterial organisms such as salmonella and campylobacter;
atypical mycobacteria such as Mycobacterium aviumintracellulare (MAI); viral causes such as Cytomegalovirus
(CMV); other parasites such as giardia and amoeba; and
fungal infections such as candida.
In patients with advanced immunosuppression, prevention is better than cure. Simple advice to drink only boiled
water reduces exposure to cryptosporidiosis. Standard
ltration or chlorination processes are not effective in
eradicating these protozoa from water supplies [38].
Boiling drinking water for 12 min kills the organisms
and reduces the risk of infection [21]. Successful combination antiretroviral therapy is, however, the only treatment
available which has been shown to eradicate opportunistic
enteroparasites through a process of host-immune reconstitution [8,28].
In those patients who are acutely unwell through a
combination of fevers, dehydration and diarrhoea, quinolones such as ciprooxacin should be effective against
associated bacterial causes of diarrhoea. Supportive
measures with either oral or intravenous rehydration are
important to correct electrolyte imbalances quickly. For
those patients who do not respond to antiretroviral therapy,
symptomatic measures such as the liberal use of antidiarrhoeals (loperamide and codeine phosphate) and, in some
patients, opiates may be needed.
Treatment with subcutaneous somatostatin analogues
such as octreotide may help patients by reducing intestinal
motility and by blocking the secretory mechanism of
diarrhoea. These drugs work via inhibiting intestinal
secretion stimulated by calcium, AMP and GMP and
enhance water and electrolyte reabsorption [39]. Use of
somatostatin analogues can result in dramatic reductions
in stool volume, and in some patients help alleviate
symptoms of nocturnal incontinence, although randomized
controlled trials have shown only limited value. Newer
longer-acting somatostatin analogues, which require only
fortnightly or monthly injections, have made this option
easier to administer.
Specic therapies for cryptosporidia and microsporidia,
such as paromomycin [40] and albendazole [33,34], can
alleviate symptoms by reducing parasite load and reducing
stool volume; however, the organisms are not eradicated.
Recently newer antimicrosporidial agents such as the
water-insoluble antibiotic, fumagillin, have been used
successfully in the treatment of supercial keratitis
secondary to microsporidial infection [41]. However,
systemic use is limited by toxicity. TNP-470, a newer
semisynthetic analogue of fumagillin, is currently being
assessed in vitro [42]. Recent results suggest that these
newer agents can inhibit replication of microsporidia by up
to 70%; however, studies in vivo are still awaited [42]. To
date, no similarly promising compounds have been
identied against cryptosporidial infections. Discrepancies
between drug assays in vitro, in animal models and in
human trials still frustrate efforts to identify any effective
anticryptosporidial agents [43].
Other therapies such as human bovine colostrum [44]
and letrazuril [40] have been tried in the past. Although
they may have helped to reduce symptoms, they did not
effect a cure. Thalidomide has been used with some success
in alleviating diarrhoeal symptoms of microsporidial
infection [45]. It has a number of potential actions,
References
1 Crotty B, Smallwood RA. Investigating diarrhea in patients
with acquired immunodeciency syndrome. Gastroenterology
1996; 110: 296310.
2 Sharpstone D, Gazzard B. Gastrointestinal manifestations of
HIV infection. Lancet 1996; 348: 379383.
3 Blanshard C, Jackson AM, Shanson DC, Francis N, Gazzard BG.
Cryptosporidiosis in HIV-seropositive patients. Q J Med 1992;
85: 813823.
4 Palella FJ Jr, Delaney KM, Moorman AC et al. Declining
morbidity and mortality among patients with advanced human
immunodeciency virus infection. N Engl J Med 1998; 338:
853860.
5 American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) Clinical
Practice and Practice Economics Committee. AGA technical
review on the evaluation and management of chronic
diarrhoea. Gastroenterology 1999; 116: 14641486.
Summary
Refractory diarrhoea secondary to opportunistic protozoal
pathogens has become less of a problem in HIV-infected
individuals since the widespread use of combination
antiretroviral therapy. Pathogens such as cryptosporidia
and microsporidia are now rare causes of diarrhoea in HIVinfected individuals. Nowadays, these conditions are rarely
seen in HIV individuals routinely followed-up in clinic, as
they tend to be treated with HAART before the CD4 count
falls below 200 cells/mL. However, these pathogens may
still cause signicant pathology in those where the HIV
status is unknown, especially in those patients presenting
with diarrhoea as their initial AIDS-presenting diagnosis.
The majority of these patients have CD4 counts below 200
cells/mL. In those affected, the only treatment available is
HAART which, if successful, suppresses viral replication
and results in reconstitution of the immune system leading
to eradication of previously untreatable parasites. Immune
reconstitution may take up to 6 months to be effective and
therefore, while a response is awaited from HAART,
symptomatic measures such as antidiarrhoeals, uid
replacement and enteral supplements may still be required.
For patients with high-volume diarrhoea, specic measures
such as albendazole, paromomycin or subcutaneous
octreotide may be useful in reducing symptoms while
awaiting a response from HAART. It is important to
remember that HAART results in suppression but not
eradication of the human immunodeciency virus, and
therefore life-long therapy is required [50,51]. Those
individuals who fail therapy, as a result of emerging viral
resistance or as a failure of drug compliance, will remain
prone to re-infection and hence continued vigilance is
required.
243246.
30 Weber R, Bryan RT, Bishop HS, Wahlquist SP, Sullivan JJ,
(abstract O13).
19: 242245.
14951499.
40 Blanshard C, Shanson Dc Gazzard BG. Pilot studies of
515518.
267272.
502504.
44 Nord J, Ma P, DiJohn D, Tzipori S, Tacket CO. Treatment with
112: 18231829.
46 Sharpstone DR, Rowbottom AW, Nelson MR, Lepper MW,
989994.