You are on page 1of 11

NOTICE TO AGENT IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL

NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL IS NOTICE TO AGENT

REQUESTING TO PRODUCE DOCUMENTS, INTERROGATORIES AND REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS
THIS NOTICE OF COMMERCIAL GRACE IS THE FINAL OPPORTUNITY TO RESPOND AND CURE
AND INTENT TO INSTITUTE REMEDY
Respondent NEW CENTURY, OCWEN, , and beneficiary as holder in due course (Alibi)
Consider this as point per point requests as required by law. I am requested that you provided proof of
claim. A copy of the security instrument is not a sufficient proof of claim as per U.C.C. - ARTICLE 3 -§3501 (b) 2 (1). Under this code, I am entitled to have the instrument presented to me as you are required
to upkeep the legal document entrusted to you.
Under USC Title 18 Chapter 25, you are engaging in counterfeiting and such behavior is a felony.
(Animus Furandi) Providing a photocopy of a security instrument is not only unconscionable but is
illegal. I had asked for the visual inspection of the original promissory note, not a copy.
If you do not provide any proof to sufficiently satisfying your claim under U.C.C. - ARTICLE 3 -§3302 that (Animus) you are a note holder in due course. And further as stipulated in your judgment
“Request for information. Ocwan is ordered herein to provide such information under 15 U.S.C. §
6802(e) (1) (A), (5)”

The following are points to reassert in regards to my debt dispute
first material fact - deed of trust recorded in favor of new century mortgage Corporation
instrument number NEW CENTURY, OCWEN, by Commonwealth title duly stating that new century
mortgage as lender and American title Company as trustee allegedly notarized December 17,
2001 without official notary seal affixed on the document allegedly signed by NEW CENTURY, OCWEN, (
However you will find attached a handwriting expert report stating that this is not the trustor
signature that in fact it was forged) and as an affidavit the trustor believes and upon that belief
states that this is not his signature that he was materially altered and he was not informed of the
said alteration(Consensus Ad Idem)
Homeowner Bill of Rights (Civil Code §2924.17(c).) (Civil Code §2924(a)(6).) As determined by professional circles a sign of the fictitious
individual for which California civil code h a s mandated that any title which possesses a signature of this type makes a non-judicial
f o r e c l o s u r e null and void!! WILLFUL BREACH OF UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE’S ARTICLE 3; WILLFUL DISREGARD OF THE FAIR
DEBT COLLECTION PRACTICES ACT (15 USC 1692G); KNOWINGLY VIOLATING T H E REAL ESTATE SETTLEMENT PROCEDURES ACT, 12 U.S.C.
SECTION 2605(E). UPON RECEIVING TRUTH IN LENDING ACT (“TILA”), REQUEST WHICH REQUIRED FULL DISCLOSER 15 U.S.C. §1635(I)

NOTICE TO AGENT IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL
NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL IS NOTICE TO AGENT
To be replaced by your particular set of violations pertaining to property

Second material fact - A notice of default and election to sell was filed instrument number
TD service Company as trustee and provident bank as the servicer of the said note no prior
assignments or substitutions the trustor paid $ 50,000 to bring it current document that should
have been claimed void due to the void nature of the deed of trust
third material fact - next document recorded NEW CENTURY, OCWEN, entitled assignment of deed of
trust initiated by PCFS financial services signed as new century mortgage Corporation as the
shipping manager not an officer of the said corporation also a well-known Robo signer please see
NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT CASE NO: 2011-CP-10-1648 STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA COUNTY OF CHARLESTON please
Note that in California it is illegal to foreclose on a property with Robo signing as a breach of chain of title and not
within state regulations

Fourth material fact - notice of default was filed on
instrument number 0
1
indicating Fidelity National foreclosure solutions as the trustee. Which the trustor paid 50,000 to
cure the default on
NEW CENTURY, OCWEN,

NEW CENTURY, OCWE

NEW CENTURY, OCWEN,

fifth material fact - on
lone Star mortgage service LLC acting as trustee cause the
recordation of a notice of default indicating new century mortgage as the beneficiary signed as
lone Star mortgage service LLC as agent for the current beneficiary by American title insurance
company as attorney in fact the trustor paid $50,000 to bring this current
six material fact - on 9/8 /2005 CB loan asset management LLC cause the recordation of an
assignment of mortgage instrument number NEW CENTURY, OCWEN, provident bank assigning the mortgage
to US Bank national Association as trustee under the pooling and servicing agreement dated as of
March 2002 Morgan Stanley Dean Witter capital Inc. trust 2002 – NC (A RAMIC Pool at that) (Cestui
Que Trust or Cestui Que Use)the document was signed by a not sure if vice president of provident
bank or Litton loan servicing LP both are mentioned as attorney in fact for provident bank it stated
on the bottom and I would presume it was signed by attorney in fact law signer must be an officer
of the Corporation. Please note that this conveyance happened in 2005 long after that pooling and
servicing contract had come to an end therefore attached pooling and servicing agreement does
not indicate anywhere the instrument number or lone number of the said property. Where did it
go!
NEW CENTURY, OCWEN,

Legal title. [Citations.] ... [A] forged document is void ab initio and constitutes a nullity; as such it cannot provide the basis for a superior
title as against the original grantor.' [Citations.]" (Id. at pp. 379-380.) A forgery includes a "`false making of a writing'" that "`falsely
p u r p o r t s to be the writing of another.'" (Wutzke v. Bill Reid Painting Service, Inc. (1984) 151 Cal.App.3d 36, 41-42 [198
Cal.Rptr. 418], italics omitted.) A deed that has been materially altered after it was signed is a forgery. (Montgomery v. Bank of America
(1948) 85 Cal.App.2d 559, 563 [193 P.2d 475] ["Since the deed was altered without the knowledge, consent or approval of plaintiffs, after
it had been signed by them and transmitted to the escrow holder, it was void."]; Wutzke v. Bill Reid Painting Service, Inc., supra, at pp. 4344 [a forged deed is void].) . LAW AND ANALYSIS A party seeking to bring a case into federal court on grounds of diversity carries the
burden of establishing diversity jurisdiction. Coyne v. American Tobacco Company, 183 F. 3d 488 (6th Cir. 1999). Further, the plaintiff
“bears the burden of demonstrating standing and must plead its components with specificity.” Coyne, 183 F. 3d at 494; Valley Forge
Christian College
v. Americans United for Separation of Church & State, Inc., 454 U.S. 464 (1982). The minimum constitutional requirements for standing
are: proof of injury in fact causation and redressability Valley Forge 454 U S at 472

NOTICE TO AGENT IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL
NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL IS NOTICE TO AGENT
please note the reason that I have itemized the chain of title as so you can see there are multiple
violations the trustor paid a combined total of $200,000 in foreclosure fees, yet as the
document was supposed to be inspected by a title officer nobody mentioned that there was no
notary seal recorded on the initial deed of trust therefore he was not aware that his name was
forged on the aforementioned deed as well (Crimen Omnia Ex Se Nata Vitiat).Please note the deed of
trust constitutes your main agreement between the trustor and the beneficiary and the agent the
trustee. Forged deed is void in any state you cannot deliver clear title from forgery, further the
adman of no notary seal, violates both the notarial laws of California i.e. no instrument has been
created because it bears no seal therefore to sell or to convey this document without the seal is
against the securities regulation and securities exchange commission would not take it lightly.
Since it was allegedly put as a part of a pooling and servicing agreement and every subsequent
transfer was done illegally (I would highly suggest for you to contact, Commonwealth title since
by law they are the
ones responsible to record a valid document not a forgery , (Actus
Reus)with no notary seal they should refund in accordance with the insurance ALTA policy to the
beneficiary the full amount of the loan) further material facts the trustor has been solicited by
OCWAN servicing company a multitude of times to sign a modification agreement sight unseen
Qualified. The difficulty with this scenario is the trustor advanced years of 80 and the fact that a
modification would extend further 30 years unfortunately there is no insurance company that
has projections of 110-year-old man paying payments on a mortgage, makes this” elder abuse
“and in violation of fair debit collection act. (Predatory Lending tactics) i.e. believe ocwan
servicing has been ordered to pay considerable sums for this exact violation. Case 1:14-CV-01028RMC The reduction of principal, well this is your chance CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION
BUREAU, STATE AUTHORITIES ORDER OCWEN TO PROVIDE $2 BILLION IN RELIEF

An offer in compromise (Audi Alteram Partem)
we will not proceed with filing a complaint and requesting compensatory and punitive damages
in excess of 3 ½ times the amount of loan (Actio Personalis Moritur Cum Persona)and you will save
your attorney fees furthermore you will be in compliance with your judgments to lower principal
sums and receive benefits from the government and even further you will be allowed to collect
from the title insurance company your fool some and we will indemnify you against any further
action, considering the fact that the trustor has paid in excess of $400,000 for a 300 and some
odd thousand dollar loan (Ceteris Paribus)for you to reconvey dismiss and assign the note back to
the trustor, with no further recourse is the only remedy that we seek (Bona Fide)should you try to
foreclose via trustee knowing that it’s a forged document that would put you in criminal
violation! and the rights of the trustor will be examined in court which will be quite costly for
you, please consider this offer in compromise as a final one I will be in the remainder of the
pages requesting full documentation from you. Original wet signatures which you may or may
not possess and will be preparing a case with the trustor attorney awaiting your response to file,
I hope you will see the sense and respond positively and remove the lien from the property

NOTICE TO AGENT IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL
NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL IS NOTICE TO AGENT
seventh material fact - on
a notice of default recorded instrument number
indicating lone Star mortgage service LLC as a trustee further on 02 /22/07 a notice of default was
filed instrument number 2NEW CENTURY, OCWEN, First American loan as trustee Litton loan servicing LLP
signed by windy Randel First American title insurance Company as attorney-in-fact a notice
of trustee sale was filed further on 05 /25/ 2007 instrument number 2NEW CENTURY, OCWEN, next relevant
documents filed nine 2/10/2007 instrument number 2NEW CENTURY, OCWEN, a new notice of default and
DEX West LLC as trustee finally ending on 01 /17/08 a notice of rescission of notice of default
recorded by DEX West 2NEW CENTURY, OCWEN, instrument number signed by and DEX West LLC authorized
agent with no substitution of trustee recorded prior to the trustor paying 50,000 to bring this
current
NEW CENTURY, OCWEN,

NEW CENTURY, OCWEN,

eight material fact - a substitution of trustee was filed on 05/02/2007 instrument number 2007
First American loan start trustee new century mortgage as the beneficiary signed and
notarized U.S. Bank national Association as trustee under the pooling and servicing agreement
dated as of March 1, 2002 signed by assistant secretary the fact that the substitution of trustee
was filed after the notice of default requires an affidavit to be sent out to the trustor there is no
recorded affidavit for many of these defaults

NEW CENTURY, OCWEN

Ninth material fact - next recorded document five 1/30/2008 instrument number NEW CENTURY, OCWEN,
indicating quality loan service Corp. as trustee a notice of default filed further on 06/ 24/2008
substitution of trustee NEW CENTURY, OCWEN, recorded by quality loan service Corp. and a rescission of
notice of default on 08/08/2008 by the aforementioned quality loan service Corp. and the
trustor had paid 50,000 for this as well
10th material fact - on 10/06/ 2009 quality loan service Corp. recorded a new notice a default
instrument number NEW CENTURY, OCWEN, however on 11 /17/2009 a substitution of trustee was
executed by US Bank instrument number NEW CENTURY, OCWEN, indicating that quality loan service Corp.
to be the new trustee .A notice of trustee sale was filed on 10/8/ 2010 instrument number
NEW CENTURY, OCWEN,
further a notice of rescission was filed as well on 01/ 13 /2010 as instrument
NEW CENTURY, OCWEN,
number 2
for which the trustor paid $50,000 to bring it current
11th material fact - on 03 32,011 instrument number NEW CENTURY, OCWEN, there was a new notice of
default filed by First American trustee service solutions Litton loan LLP signed by First American
trustee service solutions and on 08/ 32/2011 a substitution of trustee was recorded in favor of
First American trustee service solutions initiated by U.S. Bank national Association followed by
notice of trustee sale on 09/02/ 2011 instrument number NEW CENTURY, OCWEN, followed by another
notice of trustee sale recorded 05/07/ 2012 instrument number 20120673715
107.085
Restrictions on trustee’s power of sale concerning certain trust agreements: Applicability; service of notice; scheduling of
date of sale; form of notice; judicial foreclosure not prohibited; “unfair lending practice” defined. NRS 107.090
Request for notice of
default and sale: Recording and contents; mailing of notice; request by homeowners’ association; effect of request. NRS 107.260
Copy of note or deed of trust for authorized requester. NRS 107.020 Transfers in trust of real property to secure obligations. Transfers in
trust of any estate in real property may be made after March 29, 1927, to secure the performance of an obligation or the payment of any
debt.

NOTICE TO AGENT IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL
NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL IS NOTICE TO AGENT
Deposit slip and cancelled check: Please provide me with a verified (sworn to by affidavit) copy
of the deposit slip for the deposit of my alleged agreement in its entirety by the alleged creditor
associated with the above alleged account/file number, and a verified copy of the cancelled
check issued by the alleged creditor as payer in payment for my alleged agreement in its
entirety and any other alleged related security instruments;
(d) Affidavit of debt & damages: Please provide me with an affidavit of debt and damages
incurred, sworn to be true, correct, complete, and not misleading, by a properly identified and
authorized officer of the alleged creditor, hereinafter “affiant,” upon his or her personal
knowledge (FRE Rule 602) stating:
(e)
That the alleged creditor is, indeed, the secured party and holder in due course of the
aforesaid alleged original agreement in issue and has an enforceable perfected security interest
therein pursuant to and in compliance with the Uniform Commercial Code (“U.C.C.”) Section 9203, Section 9-204(1), and Section 9-305, or equivalent sections of the Commercial Code of
California that has the potential of the
(ii) that the alleged creditor provided consideration to me, the alleged debtor, from the assets
they had on hand before the alleged credit was made, and incurred a financial loss under the full
and complete alleged original agreement and alleged debt, and state each and every loss that the
alleged creditor has incurred to date under the alleged debt in issue; and
(iii) That affiant has personal knowledge (FRE Rule 602) regarding the facts of the alleged debt
and is the original custodian of the books of entry, or directly supervises said original custodian
of the records.

(i)

Bookkeeping journal / account ledger entries: Please provide me with a verified (sworn to
by affidavit) copy of the complete set of original bookkeeping journal / account ledger
entries associated with my alleged agreement and alleged file/account number using
Generally Accepted Accounting Principles per 12 U.S.C. § 1831n, showing all debits and
credits and identifying the source(s) and amount of the credit funds/assets; Note: The
verifying affidavit of journal / account ledger bookkeeping entries is to be completed by

No. 1:07CV2282, et al., slip op. (N.D. Ohio Oct. 31, 2007) (Boyko, J.)COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL ORDER 07-03 Federal Rule of Civil
Procedure 83(a) (2) provides that a “local rule imposing a requirement of form shall not be enforced in a manner that causes a party to
lose rights because of a non-willful failure to comply with the requirement.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 83(a) (2). . Nelson Construction Co. v. U.S., No.
05-1205C, 2007 WL 3299161 at *3 (Fed. Cl., Oct. 29, 2007) (citing McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp. of Indiana, 298 U.S. 178
(1936)); see also Nichols v. Muskingum College, 318 F.3d 674, (6th Cir. 2003) (“in reviewing
a 12(b) (1) motion, the court may consider
evidence outside the pleadings to resolve factual disputes Case 3:07-cv-00286-TMR-MRM Document 24 Filed 11/15/2007 Page 3 of 7 -4

NOTICE TO AGENT IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL
NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL IS NOTICE TO AGENT
one last point the fact that the pooling and servicing agreement shows that the trust was closed
several years prior to the transfer, which was allegedly recorded and transferring the beneficial
ownership to a certificate and considering the default swap the triple insurance refund and
shadow banking hypothecation all of which violate multitude of regulations. Attached to this
offer you will find documentation in prof of my clam ,the lace of credible proof on your part
does not justify as the servicer to have any legal position to enforce foreclosure with this many
material facts at play please consider yourself carefully and your position and make appropriate
judgment(Consensus)

Notwithstanding the above statement Please take notice as follows:
1. Authority: That this Notice of Dispute of Alleged Debt (“Notice of Dispute”) is sent to you
pursuant to Title 15, United States Code Annotated (“U.S.C.A”) § 1692 et seq, known as the Fair
Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”), the legislative purpose of which is to protect consumers
from abusive, deceptive, and unfair debt collection practices by debt collectors;
2. Your debt collection letter: That I have received and read your debt collection letter
referenced above, identifying yourself as debt Collectors wherein you allege that I have a debt
obligation to the alleged creditor referenced above;
3. Purpose of this notice: That the purpose of this Notice of Dispute is to assert my rights in debt
collection under FDCPA §1692(g) (b) without delay and within thirty (30) days of my receipt of
your aforesaid debt collection letter;
4. Alleged debt disputed: That I hereby dispute the validity of the alleged debt in its entirety;
5. Verified documentary evidence requested: That I hereby request you provide me with the
following verified (sworn to by affidavit) documentary evidence in substantiation of the alleged
debt claimed by the alleged creditor referenced in your debt collection letter (see Exhibit A);
(a) Proof of authority: Please provide me with verified (sworn to by affidavit) proof of your
authority to represent the alleged creditor in this instant matter;
(b) Real party in interest: Please verify who the real party in interest is in this debt collection
matter;

(3)(a) A notary public seal shall be affixed to all notarized paper documents and shall be of the rubber stamp type and shall include the
words "Notary Public-State of Florida." The seal shall also include the name of the notary public, the date of expiration of the commission
of the notary public, and the commission number. The rubber stamp seal must be affixed to the notarized paper document in
photographically reproducible black ink. Every notary public shall print, type, or stamp below his or her signature on a paper document his
or her name exactly as commissioned. An impression-type seal may be used in addition to the rubber stamp seal, but the rubber stamp
seal shall be the official seal for use on a paper document, and the impression-type seal may not be substituted therefor.

NOTICE TO AGENT IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL
NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL IS NOTICE TO AGENT
(C) Alleged original creditor. Please provide me with the name and address of the alleged original
creditor if different from the alleged creditor identified in your above mentioned debt collection
letter.
(f) Alleged original agreement: Please provide me with a verified (sworn to by affidavit) copy,
both front and back, of the alleged original agreement and any other alleged original security
instruments in their entirety, including the allonge , affixed to the original
Alleged agreement for endorsements. Said affidavit is to be sworn to be true, correct, complete,
and not misleading, by a properly identified and authorized officer of the alleged creditor, who
states that he or she has personal knowledge (Federal Rules of Evidence [“FRE”] Rule 602) of the
validity of said alleged original document(s).
(i) Inspection of document(s). Please provide me with the date, time, and place convenient to
(CITY, STATE), that I can personally inspect the above alleged original agreement and any other
alleged original security instruments in their entirety relevant to the above
Alleged debt.
(ii) Custodian of document(s). Please provide me with the name, title, and address of the natural
person custodian of the alleged original agreement and of any other alleged original security
instruments.
(iii) Address of physical location of document(s). Please provide me with the address of the
physical location of the alleged original
Agreement and any other alleged original security instruments if different from “(ii)” above
.
(g) Holder in due course. Please provide me with verified (sworn to by affidavit) evidence that
the alleged creditor is the secured party in the instant matter, i.e., holder in due course, and has
a perfected security interest in the aforesaid alleged agreement and alleged debt;
(h)Proof of Value Given: Please provide me with verified (sworn to by affidavit) copies, both front
and back, of all documents and records with respect to the aforesaid alleged agreement and
alleged debt from the beginning, including but not limited to, any and all lender issued cancelled
certified checks, cashiers’ checks, money equivalents or similar instruments, identified as or
evidencing assets provided by the alleged creditor and/or the alleged original creditor to me and
indorsed by me;
STANDING AND SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION
While each of the complaints for foreclosure pleads standing and jurisdiction, evidence submitted either with the complaint or later in
the case indicates that standing and/or subject matter jurisdiction may not have existed at the time certain of the foreclosure
complaints were Case 3:07-cv-00286-TMR-MRM Document 24 Filed 11/15/2007 Page 1 of 7 -2- filed. Further, only one of these
foreclosure complaints thus far was filed in compliance with this Court’s General Order 07-03 captioned “Procedures for Foreclosure
Actions Based on Diversity Jurisdiction. Standing Federal courts have only the power authorized by Article III of the United States
Constitution and the statutes enacted by Congress pursuant thereto. Bender v. Williamsport Area School District, 475 U.S. 534, 541
(1986). As a result, a plaintiff must have constitutional standing in order for a federal court to have jurisdiction. Id.Plaintiffs have the
burden of establishing standing. Loren v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Michigan, No. 06-2090, 2007 WL 2726704 at *7 (6th Cir. Sept. 20,
2007). If they cannot do so, their claims must be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Id. (citing Central States

NOTICE TO AGENT IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL
NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL IS NOTICE TO AGENT
Ocwan executive and management should we not receive a response back from you in a
timely manner this and other documentation will be forwarded to the following
agencies this is not a pressure tactic negotiation. We believe we have enough points
of assertion and I believe your organization has already enough negative press and
pressure not to want an additional one thank you for your consideration.

CC: Ombudsman
Attorneys General,
State Mortgage Regulators
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
(“CFPB “Monitoring Committee”
BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation’s (FDIC) Involvement in ‘Operation Choke Point
SENATE BANKING, FINANCE AND INSURANCE COMMITTEE
California Department of Consumer Affairs Consumer Information Division
California Office of the Attorney General Public Inquiry Unit
Los Angeles County Department of Consumer Affairs
Department of Business Oversight Consumer Services
Federal Trade Commission.
FDIC Advisory Committee on Community Banking
Joint CFTC-SEC Advisory Committee on Emerging Regulatory Issues
Securities and Exchange Commission Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Securities and Exchange Commission (2012) - Authorized by Law Committees
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (2012) - Presidential Committees
Robert E. Feldman, Executive
Department of Business Oversight (DBO)
for relief under “Civil RICO” Federal racketeering laws (18 U.S.C. 1964), as the lender may have established a “pattern of racketeering
activity” by using the U.S. Mail more than twice to collect an unlawful debts and the lender may be in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1341, 1343,
1961 and 1962. The borrower may have other claims for relief if hecan prove there was or is a conspiracy to deprive him of property
without due process of law under 42U.S.C. 1983 (Constitutional Injury), 1985 (Conspiracy) and 1986 (“Knowledge” and Neglect to
Prevent ”a U.S. Constitutional Wrong). Under 18 U.S.C.A 241 (Conspiracy) violators, “shall be fined not more than $10,000 or
imprisoned not more than ten (10) years or both. . . Bluefield Nat’l Bank, 11 F2d 83, 271 U.S. 669.5. “A national bank has no power to
lend its credit to any person or corporation…” Bowen v. Needles Nat. Bank, 94 F 925, 36 CCA 553, CERTIORARI DENIED IN 29 S.Ct 1024,
176 US 682, 44 LED 637.6. “Mr. Justice Marshall said: The doctrine of ultra vires is a most powerful weapon to keep private corporations
within their legitimate spheres and to punish them for violations of their corporate charters, and it probably is not invoked too often…
Zinc Carbonate Co. v. First National Bank, 103Wis 125, 79 NW 229.” American Express Co. v. Citizens State Bank, 194 NW 430.7.

NOTICE TO AGENT IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL
NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL IS NOTICE TO AGENT
The original custodian of the books and records, sworn to be true, correct, complete, and not
misleading. Further, said affidavit shall contain positive identification of the custodian, and state
that he or she has personal knowledge (FRE Rule 602) of said entries.

(k) Assignment contract: If applicable, please provide me with verified (sworn to by affidavit)
proof of an assignment contract in its entirety of the alleged original agreement and the alleged
debt in issue from an alleged original creditor, as assignor, to the alleged creditor, as assignee.
(l) Proof of authority: Please provide me with a verified (sworn to by affidavit) copy of the
contract your firm has with the alleged original creditor which authorizes your firm to engage in
collection activities on their behalf against the above alleged account, and naming you as an
authorized collection agent / claims adjuster.
(m) Certification of authority: Please provide me with a verified (sworn to by affidavit) certificate
of authority from the State of California authorizing your company to transact business in the
state of California and a photocopy of your State Department of Commerce and Insurance
certificate.
(n) Form 1035: Please provide me with Department of the Treasury Form 1035 Custodian of
Documents attached or associated with my alleged original agreement and /or the name and
address of said custodian per “(b) (ii)” above;
(o) Form 1099: Please provide me with Department of the Treasury Form 1099 Original Issue
Discount for each year the alleged creditor was holder in possession of the alleged original
agreement;

(p) Vendor sales slips/vouchers: Please provide me with verified (sworn to by affidavit) copies of
all original sales slips/vouchers from all alleged vendors covering all alleged transactions in the
above referenced file/account from its inception to date.
Note: This Notice of Dispute is not a request for confirmation that you have mere photocopies of
alleged documents. I am requesting ONLY VERIFIED DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE in validation of
the alleged debt pursuant to the FDCPA.
6. Warning: That all your communications and omissions will be made a part of an incorporated
into any litigation arising from this matter.

NOTICE TO AGENT IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL
NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL IS NOTICE TO AGENT