Professional Documents
Culture Documents
NAME:
COURSE/YEAR:
SUBJECT/SECTION:
STUDENT NO.:
GROUP NO.:
SEAT NO.:
TITLE
Date Performed:
Date Submitted:
Grade
Submitted to:
INSTRUCTOR
Name:
Total Score:
Instructor:
Criteria
Excellent
(7.6-10)
Good
(5.1-7.5)
Presentation
(10 pts.)
Lab report is
thoughtful, neat,
clearly written, and
well-organized
Lab is complete,
neat, clearly
written, and wellorganized
Data Sheet
(10 pts.)
Data is correct,
complete, and
presented neatly in
data tables; graphs
are included where
appropriate
Computation
(10 pts.)
Calculations are
complete and
correct; error
analysis is correctly
completed
Discussion states
valid conclusions,
justified by the data
and procedures with
reference to
hypothesis;
comparison to
literature values
made; error is
discussed
Data is mostly
correct, complete,
and prese004nted
neatly in data
tables; graphs are
included where
appropriate
Calculations are
complete and
mostly correct;
error analysis is
attempted
Discussion states
reasonable
conclusion and
discusses your
hypothesis, your
procedure, and your
data; ideas for
improvement are
included
Interpretation of
Results
(10 pts.)
Needs
Improvement
(2.6-5.0)
Unacceptable
(1.0-2.5)
Lab is incomplete,
poorly organized, or
impossible to read
Calculations are
attempted but may
be incomplete or
incorrect; error
analysis is missing
Discussion is weak
and disorganized;
conclusions are
incorrect or absent;
there is little or no
analytical
discussion of
hypothesis,
procedures, and
data
Calculations are
largely incorrect or
absent
Discussion is
irrelevant, trivial, or
absent
Student
Evaluati
on
Instruct
ors
Evaluati
on
Answers to
Questions
(10 pts.)
thoughtfully; ideas
for improvement
are included
Answers are
complete, correct
and organized
Answers are
incorrect and
incomplete