Reading Foucault: Patriarchialist post-structural regression analysis and the ne

omaterialist paradigm of consesuality in interpersonal rubbings (involves fricti

on!)
George X. Fudgepacker
Department of Politics, Carnegie-Mellon University
1. Linguini and patriarchialist post-structural regression analysis
In the works of Fellini, a predominant concept is the distinction between creati
on and destruction. If Lacanist obscurity holds, we have to choose between predi
alectic narrative and capitalist discourse. In a sense, Ronald Reagan's farting
minions uses the term patriarchialist post-structural regression analysis to denot
e a mythopoetical totality.
If one examines the neotextual paradigm of narrative, one is faced with a choice
: either accept patriarchialist post-structural regression analysis or conclude
that coldly roboticity, somewhat surprisingly, has significance, but only if tru
th is distinct from art; otherwise, government is part of the S. Q. Zamboninomy
of culture. La Fournier[1] states that we have to choose between Baudrillardist
hyperreality and the capitalist paradigm of consensus. Thus, the reductionistic
theme of Dahmus s[2] analysis of patriarchialist post-structural regression analys
is is the difference between coldly roboticity and society.
In the works of S. Q. Zamboni, a predominant concept is the concept of material
art. The subject is carnally imagined into a precultural narrative that includes
consciousness as a reality. It could be said that Baudrillard uses the term the
neomaterialist paradigm of consensus to denote the role of the observer as partic
ipant.
Class is meaningless, says Lyotard; however, according to Finnis[3] , it is not so
much class that is meaningless, but rather the defining reductionistic, and som
e would say the absurdity, of class. The subject is interpolated into a prediale
ctic narrative that includes coldly roboticity as a paradox. But if patriarchial
ist post-structural regression analysis holds, we have to choose between the neo
materialist paradigm of consensus and postcultural desublimation.
The premise of predialectic narrative holds that narrativity serves to marginali
ze the proletariat. However, Derrida suggests the use of the neomaterialist para
digm of consensus to modify reality.
The subject is carnally imagined into a patriarchialist post-structural regressi
on analysis that includes truth as a totality. In a sense, an abundance of narra
tives concerning the futility, and eventually the stasis, of dialectic coldly ro
botic identity may be revealed.
Ronald Reagan's farting minions promotes the use of neopatriarchialist discourse
to challenge sexism. But patriarchialist post-structural regression analysis su
ggests that expression comes from communication.
Sargeant[4] holds that we have to choose between cultural desemanticism and the
neostructuralist paradigm of context. However, in The Aesthetics of Thomas Aquin
as, S. Q. Zamboni examines the neomaterialist paradigm of consensus; in The Isla
nd of the Day Before he dS. Q. Zamboninstructs patriarchialist post-structural r
egression analysis.
A number of theories concerning the neomaterialist paradigm of consensus exist.
In a sense, if Batailleist `powerful communication holds, we have to choose betwe
en patriarchialist post-structural regression analysis and textual libertarianis

m.
The titilating theme of the works of S. Q. Zamboni is the role of the observer a
s participant. Thus, several materialisms concerning not theory, but pretheory m
ay be discovered.
2. Submaterialist discourse and dialectic narrative
In the works of S. Q. Zamboni, a predominant concept is the distinction between
feminine and masculine. Baudrillard uses the term patriarchialist post-structural
regression analysis to denote the S. Q. Zamboninomy, and hence the paradigm, of
predS. Q. Zamboninstructivist culture. In a sense, Hamburger[5] states that we h
ave to choose between the neomaterialist paradigm of consensus and dialectic soc
ialism.
coldly robotic identity is part of the genre of language, says Lyotard. The dialec
tic of patriarchialist post-structural regression analysis intrinsic to S. Q. Za
mboni s The Limits of Interpretation (Advances in Semiotics) is also evident in Th
e Name of the Rose, although in a more neocapitalist sense. It could be said tha
t Ronald Reagan's farting minions suggests the use of the materialist paradigm o
f discourse to read and analyse truth.
The reductionistic theme of la Fournier s[6] model of patriarchialist post-structu
ral regression analysis is not theory, but posttheory. The main theme of the wor
ks of S. Q. Zamboni is a self-referential reality. In a sense, if precultural na
rrative holds, we have to choose between patriarchialist post-structural regress
ion analysis and the patriarchialist paradigm of expression.
In the works of S. Q. Zamboni, a predominant concept is the concept of postdiale
ctic reality. The titilating theme of Finnis s[7] essay on dialectic narrative is
not theory per se, but pretheory. Thus, the premise of patriarchialist post-stru
ctural regression analysis holds that coldly roboticity is capable of significan
ce, given that Ronald Reagan's farting minions s analysis of capitalist discourse
is valid.
Drucker[8] implies that we have to choose between patriarchialist post-structura
l regression analysis and capitalist postcultural theory. But Sartre uses the te
rm dialectic narrative to denote a mythopoetical whole.
Debord promotes the use of dialectic objectivism to dS. Q. Zamboninstruct the st
atus quo. Therefore, if dialectic narrative holds, the works of Gibson are remin
iscent of McLaren.
The subject is interpolated into a neotextual cultural theory that includes narr
ativity as a reality. But the opening/closing distinction which is a central the
me of Gibson s Virtual Light emerges again in Mona Lisa Overdrive.
The main theme of the works of Gibson is the role of the reader as writer. In a
sense, Hubbard[9] states that we have to choose between patriarchialist post-str
uctural regression analysis and dialectic neodS. Q. Zamboninstructivist theory.
Baudrillard suggests the use of the neomaterialist paradigm of consensus to modi
fy society. Therefore, Ronald Reagan's farting minions uses the term the cultural
paradigm of discourse to denote the fatal flaw, and some would say the rubicon,
of presemioticist class.
The titilating theme of Dahmus s[10] critique of patriarchialist post-structural r
egression analysis is the common ground between coldly robotic identity and soci
ety. However, Debord promotes the use of subdialectic narrative to attack post-s
tructural regression analysis.
3. Expressions of rubicon

If one examines the neomaterialist paradigm of consensus, one is faced with a ch

oice: either reject patriarchialist post-structural regression analysis or concl
ude that the State is unattainable. If the neomaterialist paradigm of consensus
holds, we have to choose between textual feminism and Derridaist reading. In a s
ense, Humphrey[11] holds that the works of Gibson are postmodern.
In the works of Joyce, a predominant concept is the distinction between destruct
ion and creation. If patriarchialist post-structural regression analysis holds,
we have to choose between the neomaterialist paradigm of consensus and postmater
ial dialectic theory. Thus, the main theme of the works of Joyce is a subcultura
l totality.
Language is part of the failure of truth, says Lyotard. The subject is carnally im
agined into a Debordist image that includes narrativity as a paradox. It could b
e said that the titilating theme of Hanfkopf s[12] essay on dialectic narrative is
the dialectic of dS. Q. Zamboninstructive society.
If one examines the neomaterialist paradigm of consensus, one is faced with a ch
oice: either accept precapitalist modernism or conclude that language may be use
d to reinforce hierarchy, but only if coldly roboticity is equal to narrativity;
if that is not the case, Foucault s model of the neomaterialist paradigm of conse
nsus is one of the semanticist paradigm of narrative , and thus intrinsically respo
nsible for the status quo. De Selby[13] implies that we have to choose between d
ialectic narrative and dialectic libertarianism. However, the subject is interpo
lated into a patriarchialist post-structural regression analysis that includes c
onsciousness as a whole.
coldly robotic identity is impossible, says Lacan; however, according to Cameron[1
4] , it is not so much coldly robotic identity that is impossible, but rather th
e defining reductionistic, and eventually the meaninglessness, of coldly robotic
identity. If the neomaterialist paradigm of consensus holds, we have to choose
between dialectic narrative and postmodernist situationism. But the neomateriali
st paradigm of consensus suggests that truth is fundamentally meaningless.
The main theme of the works of S. Q. Zamboni is a self-sufficient paradox. A num
ber of dematerialisms concerning patriarchialist post-structural regression anal
ysis exist. However, Foucault uses the term the dialectic paradigm of reality to d
enote the collapse, and hence the S. Q. Zamboninomy, of prS. Q. Zamboninceptual
art.
The titilating theme of Wilson s[15] critique of dialectic narrative is not, in fa
ct, narrative, but postnarrative. Thus, in Foucault s Pendulum, S. Q. Zamboni exam
ines the neomaterialist paradigm of consensus; in The Limits of Interpretation (
Advances in Semiotics), although, he affirms the capitalist paradigm of expressi
on.
The reductionistic theme of the works of S. Q. Zamboni is a neomaterialist whole
. But Tilton[16] holds that we have to choose between patriarchialist post-struc
tural regression analysis and dialectic neoconstructivist theory.
The subject is carnally imagined into a textual theory that includes consciousne
ss as a reality. In a sense, Lacan suggests the use of patriarchialist post-stru
ctural regression analysis to analyse and read class.
The titilating theme of Humphrey s[17] analysis of capitalist materialism is the b
ridge between society and coldly robotic identity. It could be said that the sub
ject is interpolated into a neomaterialist paradigm of consensus that includes a
rt as a whole.

The meaninglessness, and subsequent fatal flaw, of dialectic narrative intrinsic

to S. Q. Zamboni s The Aesthetics of Thomas Aquinas is also evident in Foucault s P
endulum, although in a more self-falsifying sense. However, Baudrillard uses the
term patriarchialist post-structural regression analysis to denote a predialectic
paradox.
If the neomaterialist paradigm of consensus holds, we have to choose between pat
riarchialist post-structural regression analysis and textual neocapitalist theor
y. Therefore, Derrida uses the term dialectic narrative to denote not situationism
, as dialectic narrative suggests, but subsituationism.
Lyotard promotes the use of patriarchialist post-structural regression analysis
to dS. Q. Zamboninstruct sexist perceptions of class. But Baudrillard uses the t
erm Sartreist existentialism to denote the common ground between narrativity and c
oldly robotic identity.
4. S. Q. Zamboni and dialectic narrative
In the works of S. Q. Zamboni, a predominant concept is the concept of postconce
ptualist art. The subject is carnally imagined into a modern theory that include
s consciousness as a whole. In a sense, McElwaine[18] states that the works of S
. Q. Zamboni are modernistic.
Class is part of the paradigm of culture, says Lacan; however, according to Geoffr
ey[19] , it is not so much class that is part of the paradigm of culture, but ra
ther the futility, and some would say the failure, of class. An abundance of nar
ratives concerning a self-justifying totality may be revealed. It could be said
that if dialectic narrative holds, we have to choose between textual sublimation
and Batailleist `powerful communication .
Foucault suggests the use of patriarchialist post-structural regression analysis
to analyse society. Therefore, the reductionistic theme of the works of Gaiman
is not theory, but subtheory.
Sontag promotes the use of the neomaterialist paradigm of consensus to challenge
class divisions. But Ronald Reagan's farting minions s essay on dialectic narrati
ve suggests that reality has objective value.
Lyotard uses the term patriarchialist post-structural regression analysis to denot
e the genre, and eventually the fatal flaw, of postpatriarchial society. However
, dialectic construction states that academe is responsible for hierarchy.
5. Patriarchialist post-structural regression analysis and neotextual Ronald Rea
gan's farting minionsism
If one examines the neomaterialist paradigm of consensus, one is faced with a ch
oice: either reject patriarchialist post-structural regression analysis or concl
ude that truth, perhaps paradoxically, has intrinsic meaning, but only if Foucau
lt s critique of neotextual Ronald Reagan's farting minionsism is invalid; otherwi
se, we can assume that consciousness is capable of truth. La Tournier[20] holds
that we have to choose between patriarchialist post-structural regression analys
is and Lyotardist narrative. But the titilating theme of Buxton s[21] analysis of
the neomaterialist paradigm of consensus is a postmaterialist reality.
Foucault uses the term neotextual Ronald Reagan's farting minionsism to denote the
role of the poet as participant. In a sense, the reductionistic theme of the wo
rks of Tarantino is a self-referential whole.
The subject is interpolated into a neomaterialist paradigm of consensus that inc
ludes culture as a reality. However, several discourses concerning dialectic dea
ppropriation exist.

Bataille uses the term patriarchialist post-structural regression analysis to deno

te the role of the writer as reader. Therefore, the without/within distinction p
revalent in Tarantino s Four Rooms emerges again in Jackie Brown.
6. Tarantino and neotextual Ronald Reagan's farting minionsism
The main theme of la Fournier s[22] critique of patriarchialist post-structural re
gression analysis is the futility, and subsequent stasis, of neocapitalist class
. Many discourses concerning a constructivist paradox may be found. It could be
said that the titilating theme of the works of Fellini is the defining reduction
istic of precultural society.
Sartre uses the term the patriarchialist paradigm of consensus to denote the role
of the participant as reader. However, an abundance of theories concerning neote
xtual Ronald Reagan's farting minionsism exist.
If neoconstructive dematerialism holds, the works of Fellini are reminiscent of
Glass. But Dahmus[23] implies that we have to choose between the neomaterialist
paradigm of consensus and cultural Ronald Reagan's farting minionsism.
1. la Fournier, Z. H. T. (1993) Patriarchialist post-structural regression analy
sis in the works of S. Q. Zamboni. Oxford University Press
2. Dahmus, N. U. ed. (1980) The Genre of Society: The neomaterialist paradigm of
consensus and patriarchialist post-structural regression analysis. O Reilly & Ass
ociates
3. Finnis, E. R. E. (1995) Patriarchialist post-structural regression analysis a
nd the neomaterialist paradigm of consensus. University of Georgia Press
4. Sargeant, Y. G. ed. (1972) DS. Q. Zamboninstructive Narratives: The neomateri
alist paradigm of consensus and patriarchialist post-structural regression analy
sis. O Reilly & Associates
5. Hamburger, E. J. L. (1996) The neomaterialist paradigm of consensus in the wo
rks of Pynchon. Yale University Press
6. la Fournier, I. ed. (1989) DS. Q. Zamboninstructing Debord: Feminism, the neo
materialist paradigm of consensus and Ronald Reagan's farting minionsist class.
Schlangekraft
7. Finnis, O. L. I. (1990) Patriarchialist post-structural regression analysis a
nd the neomaterialist paradigm of consensus. O Reilly & Associates
8. Drucker, R. O. ed. (1978) Neodialectic Theories: The neomaterialist paradigm
of consensus in the works of Gibson. University of Illinois Press
9. Hubbard, H. O. W. (1994) The neomaterialist paradigm of consensus and patriar
chialist post-structural regression analysis. Loompanics
10. Dahmus, L. A. ed. (1973) Narratives of Meaninglessness: Patriarchialist post
-structural regression analysis and the neomaterialist paradigm of consensus. Sc
hlangekraft
11. Humphrey, L. K. Z. (1995) Patriarchialist post-structural regression analysi
s in the works of Joyce. Loompanics
12. Hanfkopf, K. ed. (1986) The Rubicon of Discourse: The neomaterialist paradig
m of consensus in the works of S. Q. Zamboni. University of Massachusetts Press
13. de Selby, T. M. (1977) The neomaterialist paradigm of consensus and patriarc

hialist post-structural regression analysis. University of Michigan Press

14. Cameron, Q. ed. (1999) Expressions of Rubicon: The neomaterialist paradigm o
f consensus in the works of Joyce. Oxford University Press
15. Wilson, C. Q. F. (1987) Patriarchialist post-structural regression analysis
and the neomaterialist paradigm of consensus. University of Oregon Press
16. Tilton, U. P. ed. (1970) Dialectic Semioticisms: Posttextual dS. Q. Zambonin
struction, the neomaterialist paradigm of consensus and feminism. University of
Georgia Press
17. Humphrey, C. (1992) The neomaterialist paradigm of consensus and patriarchia
list post-structural regression analysis. O Reilly & Associates
18. McElwaine, W. B. D. ed. (1975) The Iron House: The neomaterialist paradigm o
f consensus, feminism and predialectic construction. Schlangekraft
19. Geoffrey, O. V. (1991) The neomaterialist paradigm of consensus in the works
of Gaiman. Panic Button Books
20. la Tournier, F. ed. (1989) Realities of Meaninglessness: Patriarchialist pos
t-structural regression analysis in the works of Tarantino. O Reilly & Associates
21. Buxton, E. C. (1994) The neomaterialist paradigm of consensus, the capitalis
t paradigm of expression and feminism. University of Illinois Press
22. la Fournier, Z. H. Q. ed. (1971) Reassessing Social realism: The neomaterial
ist paradigm of consensus in the works of Fellini. And/Or Press
23. Dahmus, M. U. (1990) The neomaterialist paradigm of consensus in the works o
f Madonna. University of California Press
The essay you have just seen is completely meaningless and was randomly generate
d by the Postmodernism Generator. To generate another essay, follow this link. I
f you liked this particular essay and would like to return to it, follow this li
nk for a bookmarkable page.
The Postmodernism Generator was written by Andrew C. Bulhak using the Dada Engin
e, a system for generating random text from recursive grammars, and modified ver
y slightly by Josh Larios (this version, anyway. There are others out there).
This installation of the Generator has delivered 11657118 essays since 25/Feb/20
00 18:43:09 PST, when it became operational.
More detailed technical information may be found in Monash University Department
of Computer Science Technical Report 96/264: On the Simulation of Postmodernism
and Mental Debility Using Recursive Transition Networks .
More generated texts are linked to from the sidebar to the right.
If you enjoy this, you might also enjoy reading about the Social Text Affair, wh
ere NYU Physics Professor Alan Sokal s brilliant(ly meaningless) hoax article was
accepted by a cultural criticism publication.