TODAY'S NEWSPAPER Subscribe | PostPoints NEWS SEARCH: washingtonpost.

com  > Politics POLITICS OPINIONS BUSINESS LOCAL SPORTS ARTS & LIVING GOING OUT GUIDE JOBS CARS REAL ESTATE RENTALS CLASSIFIEDS

| Search Archives

Reversing itself, FDA expresses concerns over health risks from BPA
By Lyndsey Layton Saturday, January 16, 2010
TOOLBOX Resize Print E-mail

The Food and Drug Administration has reversed its position on the safety of Bisphenol A, a chemical found in plastic bottles, soda cans, food containers and thousands of consumer goods, saying it now has concerns about health risks.

WHO'S BLOGGING » Links to this article

Growing scientific evidence has linked the chemical to a host of problems, including cancer, sexual dysfunction and heart disease. Federal officials said they are particularly concerned about BPA's effect on the development of fetuses, infants and young children. "We have some concern, which leads us to recommend reasonable steps the public can take to reduce exposure to BPA," said Joshua Sharfstein, FDA's deputy commissioner, in a conference call to reporters Friday. Regulators stopped short of banning the compound or even requiring manufacturers to label products containing BPA, saying that current data are not clear enough to support a legal crackdown. FDA officials also said they were hamstrung from dealing quickly with BPA by an outdated regulatory framework. Sharfstein said the agency is conducting "targeted" studies of BPA, part of a two-year, $30 million effort by the administration to answer key questions about the chemical that will help determine what action, if any, is necessary to protect public health. The Obama administration pledged to take a "fresh look" at the chemical. BPA, used to harden plastics, is so prevalent that more than 90 percent of the U.S. population has traces of it in its urine, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Researchers have found that BPA leaches from containers into food and beverages, even at cold temperatures. The FDA's announcement came after extensive talks between federal agencies and the White House about the best approach to an issue that has become a significant concern for consumers and the chemical industry. One administration official privy to the talks said the FDA is in a quandary. "They have new evidence that makes them worried, but they don't have enough proof to justify pulling the stuff, so what do you do?" said the official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity. "You want to warn people, but you don't want to create panic." The FDA had long maintained that BPA is safe, relying largely on two studies funded by the chemical industry. The agency was faulted by its own panel of independent science advisers in 2008, which said its position on BPA was scientifically flawed because it ignored more than 100 published studies by government scientists and university laboratories that raised health concerns about BPA. Recent data found health effects even at low doses of BPA -- lower than the levels considered safe by the FDA. The chemical industry, which produces more than 6 billion tons of BPA annually and has been fighting restrictions on its use, said Friday's announcement was good news because the agency did not tell people to stop using products containing the chemical. "The science continues to support the safety of BPA," said Steven Hentges of the American Chemistry Council. In a statement, the industry group said: "Plastics made with BPA contribute safety and convenience to our daily lives because of their durability, clarity and shatter-resistance. Can liners and food-storage containers made with BPA are essential components to helping protect the safety of packaged foods. . . . ACC remains committed to consumer safety, and will continue to review new scientific studies concerning the safety of BPA."
CONTINUED     1    2
More in the Politics Section
2008 Fundraising Latest Politics Blog Updates

   Next >

See who is giving to the '08 presidential candidates. Research Donations ... By Name, Occupation, Employer or Zip Code ...By State

The Trail: Bush, Clinton: Stabilization first priority (updated 3 hours ago) Index of Politics Columns and Blogs | Opinions Section

© 2010 The Washington Post Company
NEWS | POLITICS | OPINIONS | BUSINESS | LOCAL | SPORTS | ARTS & LIVING | GOING OUT GUIDE SEARCH: Search Archives JOBS | CARS | REAL ESTATE | RENTALS | CLASSIFIEDS

washingtonpost.com : Contact Us | Work for Us | Advertisers | Site Map | Search Terms | Topics Index | | Newsletters | Mobile | RSS | Widgets The Washington Post: Subscribe | Home Delivery Service | Advertisers | PostPoints | e-Replica | Online Photo Store | The Washington Post Store | About The Post The Washington Post Company: Information and Other Post Co. Websites © Copyright 1996- The Washington Post Company | User Agreement and Privacy Policy | Rights and Permissions Help | Contact Us

Sign up to vote on this title
UsefulNot useful